基于CiteSpace Ⅲ的中外RDA研究比较分析
|
摘要
利用信息可视化软件CiteSpaceⅢ,以CNKI、Web of Science(WoS)等5个中外数据库为数据来源,从知识基础、研究主体、研究热点3个角度对中外RDA研究成果进行比较分析后发现:中外RDA研究的相同之处在于研究主体都是国家图书馆和高校图书馆,研究热点集中在RDA与其他编目规则的比较及RDA规则的本地化方面。不同之处在于国外RDA研究的知识基础阐明了RDA的设计理由,聚焦于RDA的应用与推广,研究热点关注RDA在实际工作中遇到的问题,尝试通过改进RDA规则使其能够适用于更多种类的文献,研究主体呈现以美国为主、西方国家间合作较为紧密的态势;而国内研究则侧重RDA的引进及理论介绍,聚焦于RDA对中文编目工作的影响,研究热点更关注RDA规则在中文资源编目中的使用情况,研究主体间合作较为分散。
Data in 5 databases at home and abroad, such as CNKI and Web of Science(WoS) is analyzed by information visualization software CiteSpace Ⅲ in aspects of knowledge base, research subject and hotspot. RDA researches at home and abroad are similar. Their research subjects are national library and university library, one of hotspots focuses on the comparison of RDA and other cataloging rules, and the localization of RDA rules.There are differences as well. RDA research abroad clarifies the rationale for RDA design in the knowledge base, focuses on the application and promotion, attaches more importance to problems encountered in the practice of job, attempts to improve RDA rules to make it applicable to more kinds of documents, and research subjects mainly include the U.S. and close cooperation among western countries. While research at home is more about introducing the theory and impact of RDA on Chinese cataloging, concerns more with the use of RDA rules in Chinese resource cataloguing, and cooperation among the subjects is more dispersed.
Data in 5 databases at home and abroad, such as CNKI and Web of Science(WoS) is analyzed by information visualization software CiteSpace Ⅲ in aspects of knowledge base, research subject and hotspot. RDA researches at home and abroad are similar. Their research subjects are national library and university library, one of hotspots focuses on the comparison of RDA and other cataloging rules, and the localization of RDA rules.There are differences as well. RDA research abroad clarifies the rationale for RDA design in the knowledge base, focuses on the application and promotion, attaches more importance to problems encountered in the practice of job, attempts to improve RDA rules to make it applicable to more kinds of documents, and research subjects mainly include the U.S. and close cooperation among western countries. While research at home is more about introducing the theory and impact of RDA on Chinese cataloging, concerns more with the use of RDA rules in Chinese resource cataloguing, and cooperation among the subjects is more dispersed.
引文
[1]张秀兰,鲁月.国外RDA研究综述[J].图书馆学刊,2016(10):135-139.
[2]高红.RDA标准及理念对我国文献编目工作的启示[J].国家图书馆学刊,2008(1):65-69.
[3]朱俊卿.我国RDA研究述评[J].图书情报工作网刊,2011:8-12.
[4]熊健敏.我国RDA研究现状综述[J].图书情报工作,2013,51(21):138-143.
[5]李芳.国内RDA理论研究现状分析与对策[J].图书馆杂志,2014(10):20-26.
[6]梁红,胡远珍.海峡两岸RDA实施历程比较[J].图书馆论坛,2016(6):134-141.
[7]曾伟忠,胡建敏.国内外RDA的研究情况及其深入研究的思考[J].图书馆理论与实践,2014(4):37-39.
[8]李琬,孙斌栋.西方经济地理学的知识结构与研究热点:基于CiteS pace的图谱量化研究[J].经济地理,2014,34(4):7-12.
[9]邱均平,吕红.近五年国际图书情报学研究热点、前沿及其知识基础:基于17种外文期刊知识图谱的可视化分析[J].图书情报知识,2013(3):4-15.
[10]Lim S C.Successive Entry Serials Cataloging:An Evaluation[J].Serials Librarian,1988,14(1-2):59-69.
[11]Armitage L H,Enser P G B.Analysis of User Need in Image Archives[J].Journal of Information Science,1997,23(4):287-299.
[12]Wallingford K T,Ruffin A.,Ginter K A.Outreach Activities of the National Library of Medicine:A Five-Year Review[J].Bulletin of the Medical Library Association,1996,84(2):1-60.
[13]Andrew P G,Musser L R.Collaborative Design of World Wide Web Pages:A Case Study[J].Information Technology and Libraries,1997,16(1):34-38.
[14]Svenonius E.Millennium Project Research Agenda:Cataloging and Classification[J].Library Quarterly,2000,70(2):IX-XI.
[15]Tillett B B.Keeping Libraries Relevant in the Semantic Web with Resource Description and Access(RDA)[J].Jlis It,2011,2(2):266-272.
[16]Taylor A G.Implementing AACR and AACR2:A Personal Perspective and Lessons Learned[J].Library Resources&Technical Services,2012,56(3):122-126.
[17]Adams K,Santamauro B,Blythe K.Successive Entry,Latest Entry,or None of the Above?How the MARC21 Format,FRBR and the Concept of a Work Could Revitalize Serials Management[J].Serials Librarian,2008,54(3-4):193-197.
[18]Arastoopoor S,Fattahi R.Identification and Categorization of Related Works in the Persian Bibliographic Universe:An FRBRApproach[J].International Cataloging and Bibliographic Control,2010,39(1):12-18.
[19]Molto M B.Characteristics of Serial Title Changes and Recognition of New Serial Works:Theoretical and Practical Implications[J].Serials Review,2011,37(4):275-289.
[20]姜春林,张立伟,刘学.牛顿抑或奥尔特加?--一项来自高被引文献和获奖者视角的实证研究[J].自然辩证法研究,2014,30(11):79-85.
[21]RDA发展联合指导委员会.资源描述与检索(RDA)[M].北京:国家图书馆出版社,2014:1-3.
[22]第八次科学讨论会获奖论文选集[C].北京:北京图书馆出版社2005:152-157.
[23]曹宁.网络环境下区域合作化的中文名称规范控制:CCCNA第一次中文名称规范业务研讨会议综述[J].国家图书馆学刊,2006(1):39-43.
[24]张秀兰.书目描述与检索的最新内容标准:RDA[J].图书情报工作,2006(3):95-97.
[25]张秀兰.从AACR1到RDA:《英美编目条例》的修订发展历程[J].图书馆建设,2006(2):44-47.
[26]高红.RDA标准及理念对我国文献编目工作的启示[J].国家图书馆学刊,2008(1):65-69.
[27]王绍平.RDA与中文编目规则[J].国家图书馆学刊,2011(2):9-15.
[28]杨莉萍.美国国会图书馆RDA服务实践所感[J].现代情报,2011(11):75-78.
[29]罗翀.国家图书馆RDA本地化的探索与践行[J].数字图书馆论坛,2018(2):2-6.
[30]Paola P,Virginia O R.RDA,the New Cataloging Code:Changes and Challenges[J].Revista Espanola de Documentacion Cientifica,2012,35(1):145-173.
[31]Estivill-Rius A.Resource Description and Access,RDA.Another Delay to Better Prepare for the Change[J].Profesional de la Informacion,2011,20(6):694-700.
[32]Smiraglia R P.Bibliocentrism Revisited:RDA and FRBR00[J].Knowledge Organization,2015,42(5):296-301.Kailus A,Aliverti C,Fabian C.RDA and Cultural Institutions[J].
[33]Zeitschrift fur Bibliothekswesen und Biblio-graphie,2015,62(6):329-338.
[34]Novotna E.Cataloging Cartographic Documents with RDA[J].Processional de la Informacion,2014,23(2):195-203.
[35]Alonso-Lifante M P,Chain-Navarro C.Google Sky and Cataloguing Standards:An Example of the Divergence Between the Most Queried Astronomical Information and What Cataloguing Standards Allow Us to Describe[J/OL].[2018-04-07].http://xueshu.baidu.com/s?wd=paperuri:(88e89cf255dc03eb6aad7afaac9c386f)&filter=sc_long_sign&sc_ks_para=q%3DGoogle+Sky+and+cataloguing+s tandards%3A+an+example+of+the+divergence+between+the+most+queried+astronomical+information+and+what+cataloguing+standards+allow+u...&tn=SE_baiduxueshu_c1gjeupa&ie=utf-8&sc_us=1617647818851503722.
[36]Edwards S,Dunsire G,Danskin A.RDA International[J].Zeitschrift fur Bibliothekswesen und Bibliographie,2015,26(6):305-317.
[37]Niggemann E,Junger U,Oehlschlaeger S.Transition to RDA in German-Speaking Countries[J].Zeitschrift fur Bibliothekswesen und Bibliographie,2015,62(6):318-328.
[38]Do S,Oh S G,Lee S.A Study on the User Evaluation for an RDA-Based Korean Bibliography Retrieval System[J].Library Hi Tech,2015,33(3):294-309.
[39]王松林.RDA的结构与特点[J].山东图书馆学刊,2013(4):1-6.
[40]吴丽杰.数字环境下资源描述与检索的新标准:RDA探析[J].图书馆学刊,2011(10):42-45.
[41]孙小燕,王兵.简论书目著录标准RDA和AACR2的异同[J].新世纪图书馆,2014(4):41-47.
[42]胡小菁.内容和媒介类型:RDA与ISBD对比分析[J].中国图书馆学报,2012,38(4):55-62.
[43]高红,胡小菁.《中国文献编目规则》与RDA在地图资源著录中的对比分析[J].图书馆论坛,2013,33(5):130-134.
[44]庄蕾波,胡小菁.《中国文献编目规则》和RDA对电子资源著录的异同分析[J].图书馆建设,2012(11):33-41.
[45]霍艳蓉.RDA与《中国文献编目规则》在连续出版物著录中的对比分析[J].图书馆杂志,2013(13):34-38.
[46]张期民,霍艳蓉,庄蕾波,等.适应中文的RDA修订建议[J].数字图书馆论坛,2013(7):18-22.
[47]高红,胡小菁,张期民.中文RDA应用政策[J].数字图书馆论坛,2013(7):23-28.
[48]孙逸玲.从CALIS编目员视角看RDA对中文图书著录的影响[J].高校图书馆工作,2016,36(173):37-40.
[49]韩佳.新时期图书馆推进RDA编目工作的思考[J].图书馆工作与研究,2015(7):62-64.
[2]高红.RDA标准及理念对我国文献编目工作的启示[J].国家图书馆学刊,2008(1):65-69.
[3]朱俊卿.我国RDA研究述评[J].图书情报工作网刊,2011:8-12.
[4]熊健敏.我国RDA研究现状综述[J].图书情报工作,2013,51(21):138-143.
[5]李芳.国内RDA理论研究现状分析与对策[J].图书馆杂志,2014(10):20-26.
[6]梁红,胡远珍.海峡两岸RDA实施历程比较[J].图书馆论坛,2016(6):134-141.
[7]曾伟忠,胡建敏.国内外RDA的研究情况及其深入研究的思考[J].图书馆理论与实践,2014(4):37-39.
[8]李琬,孙斌栋.西方经济地理学的知识结构与研究热点:基于CiteS pace的图谱量化研究[J].经济地理,2014,34(4):7-12.
[9]邱均平,吕红.近五年国际图书情报学研究热点、前沿及其知识基础:基于17种外文期刊知识图谱的可视化分析[J].图书情报知识,2013(3):4-15.
[10]Lim S C.Successive Entry Serials Cataloging:An Evaluation[J].Serials Librarian,1988,14(1-2):59-69.
[11]Armitage L H,Enser P G B.Analysis of User Need in Image Archives[J].Journal of Information Science,1997,23(4):287-299.
[12]Wallingford K T,Ruffin A.,Ginter K A.Outreach Activities of the National Library of Medicine:A Five-Year Review[J].Bulletin of the Medical Library Association,1996,84(2):1-60.
[13]Andrew P G,Musser L R.Collaborative Design of World Wide Web Pages:A Case Study[J].Information Technology and Libraries,1997,16(1):34-38.
[14]Svenonius E.Millennium Project Research Agenda:Cataloging and Classification[J].Library Quarterly,2000,70(2):IX-XI.
[15]Tillett B B.Keeping Libraries Relevant in the Semantic Web with Resource Description and Access(RDA)[J].Jlis It,2011,2(2):266-272.
[16]Taylor A G.Implementing AACR and AACR2:A Personal Perspective and Lessons Learned[J].Library Resources&Technical Services,2012,56(3):122-126.
[17]Adams K,Santamauro B,Blythe K.Successive Entry,Latest Entry,or None of the Above?How the MARC21 Format,FRBR and the Concept of a Work Could Revitalize Serials Management[J].Serials Librarian,2008,54(3-4):193-197.
[18]Arastoopoor S,Fattahi R.Identification and Categorization of Related Works in the Persian Bibliographic Universe:An FRBRApproach[J].International Cataloging and Bibliographic Control,2010,39(1):12-18.
[19]Molto M B.Characteristics of Serial Title Changes and Recognition of New Serial Works:Theoretical and Practical Implications[J].Serials Review,2011,37(4):275-289.
[20]姜春林,张立伟,刘学.牛顿抑或奥尔特加?--一项来自高被引文献和获奖者视角的实证研究[J].自然辩证法研究,2014,30(11):79-85.
[21]RDA发展联合指导委员会.资源描述与检索(RDA)[M].北京:国家图书馆出版社,2014:1-3.
[22]第八次科学讨论会获奖论文选集[C].北京:北京图书馆出版社2005:152-157.
[23]曹宁.网络环境下区域合作化的中文名称规范控制:CCCNA第一次中文名称规范业务研讨会议综述[J].国家图书馆学刊,2006(1):39-43.
[24]张秀兰.书目描述与检索的最新内容标准:RDA[J].图书情报工作,2006(3):95-97.
[25]张秀兰.从AACR1到RDA:《英美编目条例》的修订发展历程[J].图书馆建设,2006(2):44-47.
[26]高红.RDA标准及理念对我国文献编目工作的启示[J].国家图书馆学刊,2008(1):65-69.
[27]王绍平.RDA与中文编目规则[J].国家图书馆学刊,2011(2):9-15.
[28]杨莉萍.美国国会图书馆RDA服务实践所感[J].现代情报,2011(11):75-78.
[29]罗翀.国家图书馆RDA本地化的探索与践行[J].数字图书馆论坛,2018(2):2-6.
[30]Paola P,Virginia O R.RDA,the New Cataloging Code:Changes and Challenges[J].Revista Espanola de Documentacion Cientifica,2012,35(1):145-173.
[31]Estivill-Rius A.Resource Description and Access,RDA.Another Delay to Better Prepare for the Change[J].Profesional de la Informacion,2011,20(6):694-700.
[32]Smiraglia R P.Bibliocentrism Revisited:RDA and FRBR00[J].Knowledge Organization,2015,42(5):296-301.Kailus A,Aliverti C,Fabian C.RDA and Cultural Institutions[J].
[33]Zeitschrift fur Bibliothekswesen und Biblio-graphie,2015,62(6):329-338.
[34]Novotna E.Cataloging Cartographic Documents with RDA[J].Processional de la Informacion,2014,23(2):195-203.
[35]Alonso-Lifante M P,Chain-Navarro C.Google Sky and Cataloguing Standards:An Example of the Divergence Between the Most Queried Astronomical Information and What Cataloguing Standards Allow Us to Describe[J/OL].[2018-04-07].http://xueshu.baidu.com/s?wd=paperuri:(88e89cf255dc03eb6aad7afaac9c386f)&filter=sc_long_sign&sc_ks_para=q%3DGoogle+Sky+and+cataloguing+s tandards%3A+an+example+of+the+divergence+between+the+most+queried+astronomical+information+and+what+cataloguing+standards+allow+u...&tn=SE_baiduxueshu_c1gjeupa&ie=utf-8&sc_us=1617647818851503722.
[36]Edwards S,Dunsire G,Danskin A.RDA International[J].Zeitschrift fur Bibliothekswesen und Bibliographie,2015,26(6):305-317.
[37]Niggemann E,Junger U,Oehlschlaeger S.Transition to RDA in German-Speaking Countries[J].Zeitschrift fur Bibliothekswesen und Bibliographie,2015,62(6):318-328.
[38]Do S,Oh S G,Lee S.A Study on the User Evaluation for an RDA-Based Korean Bibliography Retrieval System[J].Library Hi Tech,2015,33(3):294-309.
[39]王松林.RDA的结构与特点[J].山东图书馆学刊,2013(4):1-6.
[40]吴丽杰.数字环境下资源描述与检索的新标准:RDA探析[J].图书馆学刊,2011(10):42-45.
[41]孙小燕,王兵.简论书目著录标准RDA和AACR2的异同[J].新世纪图书馆,2014(4):41-47.
[42]胡小菁.内容和媒介类型:RDA与ISBD对比分析[J].中国图书馆学报,2012,38(4):55-62.
[43]高红,胡小菁.《中国文献编目规则》与RDA在地图资源著录中的对比分析[J].图书馆论坛,2013,33(5):130-134.
[44]庄蕾波,胡小菁.《中国文献编目规则》和RDA对电子资源著录的异同分析[J].图书馆建设,2012(11):33-41.
[45]霍艳蓉.RDA与《中国文献编目规则》在连续出版物著录中的对比分析[J].图书馆杂志,2013(13):34-38.
[46]张期民,霍艳蓉,庄蕾波,等.适应中文的RDA修订建议[J].数字图书馆论坛,2013(7):18-22.
[47]高红,胡小菁,张期民.中文RDA应用政策[J].数字图书馆论坛,2013(7):23-28.
[48]孙逸玲.从CALIS编目员视角看RDA对中文图书著录的影响[J].高校图书馆工作,2016,36(173):37-40.
[49]韩佳.新时期图书馆推进RDA编目工作的思考[J].图书馆工作与研究,2015(7):62-64.