基于语言真值格值一阶逻辑的不确定性推理研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
本论文将语言真值格蕴涵代数引入到格值一阶逻辑中,对语言真值格蕴涵代数的一些代数结构、基于语言真值格值一阶逻辑的不确定性推理的理论与方法、基于语言真值分层格值一阶逻辑的不确定性推理的理论与方法进行了研究,并取得如下四个方面的研究成果:
     一、关于格蕴涵代数的研究
     1.在格蕴涵多项式的基础上,重新给出了格蕴涵代数不等式的定义,提出了几类格蕴涵代数不等式解集的结构特征,并得到了有些解集可构成滤子和理想的结构;
     2.提出了WLI-理想的定义,给出了WLI-理想以及由WLI-理想所生成拓扑空间的性质,得到了满足第二可数性公理的充分必要条件;
     3.提出了赋范格H蕴涵代数、蕴涵距离d→、V-距离d∨、∧-距离d∧的定义,给出了赋范蕴涵满射、赋范格H蕴涵同态、赋范格H蕴涵同构以及赋范同构的性质,并证明了收敛数列的有界性和蕴涵距离是有界的结论.
     二、关于语言真值格蕴涵代数的研究
     1.给出了语言真值格蕴涵代数的若干性质,得到了(aj,bn)→(ai,bm)=(ap,bh)→(ai,bm)(?)aj=ap且bn=bh(?)(ai,bm)→(aj,bn)=(ai,bm)→(ap,bh);
     2.给出了语言真值格蕴涵代数中对偶分子的推理性质,证明了对偶分子在一定程度上对算子∨、∧、→具有闭性;
     3.提出了语言真值格蕴涵代数中蕴涵不可约元素的定义,给出了它的推理性质.
     三、关于语言真值格语言真值格值一阶逻辑系统Lv(n×2)F(X)上的不确定性推理研究
     1.提出了基于语言真值格值一阶逻辑系统Lv(n×2)F(X)的不确定性推理理论与方法;
     2.基于语言真值格值一阶逻辑系统Lv(n×2)F(X),给出了带广义量词的推理规则,并证明了这些推理规则的合理性;
     3.提出了两种推理模型中的不确定性推理理论与方法.
     四、关于基于语言真值分层格值一阶逻辑系统Lv(n×2)fl的不确定性推理研究
     1.基于语言真值分层格值一阶逻辑系统LV(n×2)fl,给出了推理规则在(α0,β0)≤∧θ∈Lv(n×2)(θ∨θ')(θ≠(an,t))水平下的不确定性推理理论与方法,并证明了这些推理方法的合理性;
     2.提出了基于语言真值分层格值一阶逻辑系统LV(n×2)fl的不确定性推理模型的正则条件以及基于语言真值分层格值一阶逻辑系统LV(n×2)fl在蕴涵不可约元素集下的不确定性推理理论与方法.
The idea of linguistic truth-valued lattice implication algebra is introduced into the lattice-valued first-order logic in this thesis, the study presented in this dissertation concentrates on some structures of linguistic truth-valued lattice implication algebra, theories and methods of uncertainty reasoning based on linguistic truth-valued lattice-valued first-order logic Lv(n×2)F(X) and linguistic truth-valued gradational lattice-valued first-order logic Lv(n×2)fl·The innovation and main results are summarized as follows:
     Part One. The study of lattice implication algebra
     1. According to the lattice implication polynomial, the notion of inequality in lattice implication algebra was redefined. The several characterizations of solution set in unary lattice implication algebra inequalities are investigated, and the constructions of filters and ideals by some solution sets are obtained.
     2. The concept of weak Li-ideals is defined, weak Li-ideals and topological space properties based on weak Li-ideals of lattice implication algebra are investigated, and obtained the necessary and sufficient condition of second countable axiom in (L,TW(L)).
     3. The notion of normed lattice H implication algebras, implication distance d→v—distance and∧-distance are introduced. The properties of normed implication epimorphism, normed lattice H implication homomorphism. normed lattice H implication isomorphism and normed isomorphism are given. The boundedness of convergence sequence and sequences operations (i.e.,(?),(?),∨,∧,→) to implication distance are proved.
     Part Two. The study on linguistic truth-valued lattice implication algebra
     1. The properties of linguistic truth-valued lattice implication algebra are given, and obtained(aj,bn)→(aj,bm)= (aP,bh)→(ai,,bm)(?)aj= aP and bn= bh(?) (ai,bm)→(aj,bn) = (ai,bm)→(aP,bh).
     2. The reasoning properties of dual molecule in linguistic truth-valued lattice implication algebra are investigated, and it is proved that operators∨、∧、→have some degree closed.
     3. The concept of implicative irreducible element in linguistic truth-valued lattice implication algebra is introduced, and its reasoning properties are obtained.
     Part Three. The study of uncertainty reasoning based on linguistic truth-valued lattice-valued first-order logic Lv(n×2)F(X)
     1. The uncertainty reasoning theory and approach based upon linguistic truth-valued lattice-valued first-order logic Lv(n×2)F(X) are proposed.
     2. The inference rules with generalized quantifiers based upon linguistic truth-valued lattice-valued first-order logic Lv(n×2)F(X) are given, and the reasonableness of these inference rules are proved.
     3. The uncertainty reasoning theories and approaches under two inference models based upon linguistic truth-valued lattice-valued first-order logic Lv(n×2)F(X) are proposed.
     Part Four. The study of uncertainty reasoning based on linguistic truth-valued gradational lattice-valued first-order logic Lv(n×2)fl
     1. The uncertainty reasoning theory and approach of the inference rules under the level (α0,β0)≤∧(θ∨θ')(θ≠(an,t)) based upon linguistic truth-valued gradational lattice-valued first-order logic system Lv(n×2)fl is proposed, and the reasonableness of these methods are proved.
     2. The regular conditons of uncertainty inference model, the uncertainty reasoning theory and approach under the set of implicative irreducible elements based upon linguistic truth-valued gradational lattice-valued first-order logic system Lv(n×2)fl are discussed.
引文
[1]Atanassov K. Intuitionstie fuzzy sets.Fuzzy Sets and Systems,1986,20:86-96
    [2]Aianassov K. and Gargov G. Interval valued intuitionistie fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets and Systems,1989,31:343-351
    [3]Bochvar D.A. On three-valued logical calculus and its application to the analysis of contradictions. In:Mathematiceskij Sbornik,1939,4:287-308 (in Russian)
    [4]Birkhoff G. Lattice Theory.3rd Ed. New York:American Mathematical Society,1967: 6-14
    [5]Baldwin J.F. Fuzzy logic and fuzzy reasoning. Internat. J. Man-machine Stud.,1979,11: 465-480
    [6]Buchanan B.G., Shortliffe E. H. Rule-Based Expert Systems:The MYCIN Expreiments of the Stanford Heuristic Programming Project. Cambridge, MA:MIT Press,1990
    [7]Bole L.. Borowik P. Many-valued logics. New York:Springer-Verlag, Berlin-Heidelberg.1992
    [8]Busch D. Rr. A sequent axiomatization of three valued logic ith two negations. In:Pereira L.M., Nerode A.(Eds.) Logic Programming and Non-monotonic Reasonging, Cambrige, MA:MIT Press,1993,476-494
    [9]Benferhat Salem, Sylvain Lagrue, Odile Papini. Reasoning with partially ordered information in possibilistic logic framework. Fuzzy Sets and Systems,2004,144:25-41
    [10]Benferhat Salem, Claudio Sossai. Reasoning with multiple-source information in a possibilistic logic framework. Information Fusion,2006,7:80-96
    [11]Chang C.C. Algebraic analysis of many-logic. Trans Amer. Math. Soc,1958,88: 195-234
    [12]Chang C.C. A new proof of the completeness of the Lukasiewicz axioms. Trans Amer. Math. Soc.1959,93:74-80
    [13]Chen S.M., Hsiao W. H. Bidirectional uncertainty reasoning for rule-based systems using interval-valued fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets and Systems,2000.113:185-203
    [14]Czogals E., Leski J. On equivalence of uncertainly reasoning results using different interpretations of fuzzy IF-THEN rules. Fuzzy Sets and Systems,2001,117:279-296
    [15]Corden O., Herrera F., Zwir I. A hierarchical knowledge-based environment for linguistic modeling:models and iterative methodology. Fuz2y Sets and Systems,2003. 138:307-341
    [16]Chen S.W., Xu Y. Uncertainty Reasoning Based on Lattice-Valued First-Order Logic Lvfl- Proc. of 2004 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics. The Hague, The Netherlands, October 10-13,2004:2237-2242
    [17]Chen S.W., Xu Y., and Ma J. A linguistic truth-valued uncertainty resoning model based on Lattice-Valued Logic. Fuzzy system and knowledge discovery, Second International Conference, FSKD2005, LNAI 3613,2005:276-283
    [18]Chen S.W., Xu Y., Ma J. A Linguistic Truth-Valued Uncertainty Reasoning Model Based on Lattice-Valued Logic. Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence,2005,3613: 276-284
    [19]陈树伟.基于格蕴涵代数的格值一阶逻辑Lvfl中的不确定性推理研究.西南交通大学研究生博士学位论文.2006
    [20]陈图云,张宇卓.有限区间值模糊逻辑代数及其广义重言式.辽宁师范大学学报,2002,25(1):12-14
    [21]陈图云,张宇卓,廖士中.区间值模糊命题逻辑的最大子代数及其广义重言式.模糊系统与数学,2003,17(2):106-105
    [22]Coppi R. Management of uncertainty in Statistical Reasoning:The case of Regression Analysis. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning,2008,47(3):284-305
    [23]Chang Z.Y., Xu Yang, Du Weifeng, and Wu Minghui. Uncertainty Reasoning Based on Gradational Lattice-Valued First-Order Logic Lvfl. The Proceeding of the Second International Symposium on Information Processing.The Proceeding of the Second International Symposium on Information Processin. Huangshan, China, Aug.21-23, 2009:9-12
    [24]Duda R.O., Hart P.E., Nileson N.J. Subjective Bayesian Methods for Rule-Based Inference Systems. AFIPS Conference Proceedings Vol.45. AFIPS Press,1976: 1075-1082
    [25]Eugene Eberbach. Approximate reasoning in the algebra of bounded rational agents. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning,2008,49(2):316-330
    [26]Font J.M., Moussavi M. Note on a six valued extension of three valued logic. Journal of Appl. Non-Classical Logics,1993,3:173-187
    [27]Goguen J. A. The logic of inexact concepts. Synthese,1969,19:325-373
    [28]Gaines B.R. Fuzzy reasoning and logics of uncertainty. Proc. of 6th International Symp. On Multiple-valued logic, USA,1976:179-188
    [29]Glymour C. Independence assumpations and Bayesian updating. Artificial Intelligence, 1985,16(1):95-99
    [30]Gonzalez A., Pons O., Vila M.A. Dealing with uncertainty and imprecision by means of fuzzy numbers. International Journal Approximate Reasoning,1999,21:233-256
    [31]Ho N.Cat and Wolfgang Wechler. Hedge algebras: An algebraic approach to structure of sets of linguistic truth values. Fuzzy Sets and Systems,1990,35(3):281-293
    [32]Ho N.Cat and Wolfgang Wechler. Extended hedge algebras and their application to fuzzy logic, Fuzzy Sets and Systems,1992,52(3):259-281
    [33]Ho N. Cat. A methods in linguistic reasoning on a knoledge base representing by sentences ith linguistic belief degree. Fund. Inform.,1996,28(3-4):247-259
    [34]Herrera F., Herrera-Viedma E., Luis Martenez. A fusion approach for managing multi-granularity linguistic term sets in decision making. Fuzzy Sets and Systems,2000, 114:43-58
    [35]Hajek P., Harmancova D. A hedge for Godel fuzzy logic. International J. Uncertainty Fuzziness Knoledge-Based Systems,2000,8(4):495-498
    [36]Hajek P. On very true. Fuzzy Sets and Systems,2001,124:329-333
    [37]Hugnh V. N.. Tetsuga Murai, Yoshiteru Nakamori. An Algebraic Foundation for Linguistic Reasoning. Fundamenta Informaticae,2006,74:1-24
    [38]Haarslev V., Pai Hsueh-Ieng, Nematollaah Shiri. A formal framework for description logics with uncertainty. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning,2009, 50(9):1399-1415
    [39]何新贵.模糊知识处理的理论和技术.第2版.北京:国防工业出版社,1998
    [40]Jun Y.B., Roh E.H., Xu Y. LI-ideals in lattice implication algebras. Bull. Korean Math. Soc,1998,35:13-24
    [41]Jun Y.B., Xu Y. Fuzzy LI-ideals in lattice implication algebras. Journal of Fuzzy Math., 1999,7(4):997-1003
    [42]Kleene S.C. Introduction to Metamathematics. New York:Van Nostrand,1952
    [43]Komori Y. Super-Lukasiewicz implicational logic. Journal of Nagoya Math.,1978,72: 127-133
    [44]Komori Y. Super-Lukasiewicz implicational logic. Journal of Nagoya Math.,1981,84: 119-133
    [45]Lukasiewicz J. On three-valued logic. Ruch Filozoficzny,1920.5:169-170 (in Polish)
    [46]Lee R.C.T. Fuzzy logic and the Resolution Principle. J. ACM.,1972.19:109-119
    [47]Liu X.H., Xiao H. Operator fuzzy logic and fuzzy resolution. Proceedings of the 5th IEEE International Symp. on Multiple-Valued Logic (ISMVL85), Kingston, Canada, 1985:68-75
    [48]Jonathan Lawry. A framework for linguistic modelling. Artificial Intelligence,2004,155: 1-39
    [49]Lewis D. Probabilities of conditionals and conditional Probabilities. Philosophy Review, 1976,85(3):297-315
    [50]林邦瑾.制约逻辑(传统逻辑和现代逻辑的结合).贵州:贵州人民出版社,1985
    [51]刘叙华.模糊逻辑与模糊推理.长春:吉林大学出版社,1989
    [52]李未.一个开放的逻辑系统.中国科学(A辑),1992,10:1103-1113
    [53]李未.开放逻辑—一个刻画知识增长和更新的逻辑理论.计算机科学,1992,19(4):1-8
    [54]林作铨,李未.超协调逻辑(1)—传统超协调逻辑研究.计算机科学,1994,21(5):1-8
    [55]林作铨,李未.超协调逻辑(2)—新超协调逻辑研究.计算机科学,1994,21(6):1-6
    [56]林作铨,李未.超协调逻辑(3)—超协调性的逻辑基础.计算机科学,1995,22(1):1-3
    [57]林作铨,李未.超协调逻辑(4)-非单调超协调逻辑研究.计算机科学,1995,22(1):4-8
    [58]李凡.模糊信息处理系统.北京:北京大学出版社,1998.8
    [59]刘瑞胜,刘叙华.非单调推理的研究现状.计算机科学,1995,22(4):14-17
    [60]Liu Y. L., Liu S.Y., Xu Y., Qin K.Y.ILI-ideals and prime LI-ideals in lattice implication algebras. Information Sciences,2003,155:157-175
    [61]Li X.B., Ruan D., Liu J., Xu Y. A Linguistic Lattice-Valued Approach for Fuzzy Multi-Objective Decision Making. Journal of Multiple Valued-Logic & Soft Computing, 2007,14:233-249
    [62]Li X.B., Ruan D., Liu J., Xu Y. A method to multiple attribute group decision making with quantitative and qualitative information. International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems,2008,1(3):274-284
    [63]Li X.B., Pan X.D., Xu K.J., Lai J.J., Xu Y. Linguistic-valued Aggregation operators applied to multiple attribute group decision making. The 8th International FLINS Conference on Computational Intelligence in Decision and Control, Madrid, Spain, September 21-24,2008:537-542
    [64]李晓冰.基于语言真值格值逻辑的归结自动推理研究.西南交通大学研究生博士学位论文.2008
    [65]李晓冰,邱小平,常之艳,徐扬.格值命题逻辑系统中α-归结域与J-归结域的一些性质.数学季刊,2008,6:262-269
    [66]李晓冰,邱小平,徐扬.格值命题逻辑系统L2n+1P(X)中基于半正则广义文字的自动推理算法.模糊系统与数学,2009,23(4):21-26
    [67]Lukasiewicz T., Umberto Straccia. Description logic programs under probabilistic uncertainty and fuzzy vagueness.International Journal of Approximate Reasoning,2009, 50(6):837-853
    [68]龙希庆.格蕴涵代数中α-化子和不等式的研究.西南交通大学研究生硕士学位论文.2007
    [69]Mangani P. On certain algebras related to many-valued logics. Boll. U.M.I.,1973,8(4): 68-78
    [70]Mizumoto M. Extended fuzzy reasoning. Approximate Reasoning in Expert Systems. Gupta M.M, Kandel A., Bandler W., Kiszka J.B.(Eds.), North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1985:67-76
    [71]Meng D., Jia H.D., Xu Y. Framework of Six Linguistic Lattice-Valued Evaluation System. International Conference on Intelligent Systems and Knowledge engineering, 2006
    [72]Ma J., Chen S.W., Xu Y. Fuzzy logic from the viewpoint of machine intelligence. Fuzzy Sets and Systems,2006,157:628-634
    [73]Ma J., Chen S.W., Xu Y. Fuzzy Logic from the Viewpoint of Machine Intelligence. Fuzzy Sets and Systems,2006,157:628-634
    [74]Ma J., Li W.J., Ruan D., Xu Y. Filter-Based Resolution Principle for Lattice-Valued Propositional Logic LP(X). Information Sciences,2007,177:1046-1062
    [75]马守明,王汝传,叶宁.基于集对分析的上下文感知不确定性的推理方法.南京邮电大学学报(自然科学版),2009,29(1):64-67
    [76]Novak V. First-order fuzzy logic. Studia logica,1982.46(1):87-109
    [77]Nilsson N. J. Probalistie logic. Artificial Intelligence,1986,28:71-81
    [78]Novak V. On the syntactico-semantical completeness of first order fuzzy logic, Part Ⅰ, Ⅱ. Kybernetika,1990,26:47-66,134-154
    [79]Novak V, Perfilieva I., Mojckojr J. Mathematical Principles of Fuzzy Logic. Kluwer, 1999
    [80]Niittymaki J., Turunen E. Traffic signal control on similarity logic reasoning. Fuzzy Sets and Systems.2003,133:109-131
    [81]Own C.M. Handling partial truth on type-2 similarity based reasoning. Expert Systems with Applications.2009,36(2):3007-3016
    [82]Post E. Introduction to a general theory of elementary propositions. American Journal of Mathematics,1921,43:163-185. In:J. Van Heijenoort (ed.), From Frege to Godel:A source book in mathematical logic,1879-1931
    [83]Pavelka J. On fuzzy logic I:Many-valued rules of inference. Zeitschr. F. Math. Logik und Grundlagend, Math.,1979,25:45-52
    [84]Pavelka J. On fuzzy logic II:Enriched residuated lattice and semantics of propositional calculi. Zeitschr. F. Math. Logik und Grundlagend, Math.,1979,25:119-134
    [85]Pavelka J. On fuzzy logic III:Semantical completeness of some many-valued propositional calculi. Zeitschr. F. Math. Logik und Grundlagend, Math.,1979,25: 447-464
    [86]Poole D缺席推理的逻辑框架.计算机科学,1991,18(3):57-65
    [87]Per P. Roe and Leblane H. Probability Theory and Probability Logic. Toronto: University of Toronio Press,1999
    [88]Parsons Simon. On precise and correct qualitative probabilistic inference. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning,2004,35:111-135
    [89]Pei Z., Xu Y. Lattice implication algebra model of a kind of linguistic terms and its inference. Proceedings of the 6th International FLINS Conference.2004,93-98
    [90]Pei Zheng. Jiang Baoqing, Yi Liangzhong, Xu Yang. Semantics Properties of Compound Evaluating Syntagms. Proceedings of the IFSA 2007 World Congress on theoretical advances and applications of fuzzy logic and soft computing, Cancun, Mexico. June 18-21,2007. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heilin Heidelberg 2007.2007: 822-831
    [91]Pei Zheng, Ruan Da, Liu Jun, Xu Yang. Linguistic Values Based Intelligent Information Processing:Theory, Methods, and Applications. France:ATLANTIS PRESS, Nov.. 2009
    [92]秦克云,徐扬.格值命题逻辑(Ⅱ).西南交通大学学报,1994,2(1):22-27
    [93]秦克云,徐扬.格值命题逻辑系统L(X)(I).模糊系统与数学,1997,4(11):5-11
    [94]秦克云,徐扬,宋振明.格值命题逻辑系统L(Ⅹ)(Ⅱ).模糊系统与数学,1998,12(1):10-19
    [95]Qin K.Y., Pei Z., Jun Y.B. On Normed Lattice Implication algebras. Journal of Fuzzy Mathematics,2006,14(3):673-681
    [96]Shortliffe E.H., Buchanan B.G. A model of inexact reasoning in medicine. Mathematical Boosciences,1975,23:351-379
    [97]Steve G. Probabilistic inferential engines in expert systems:how the strength of rules should be expressed. Bouchon B., Yager R.R. (Eds.), Uncertainty in Knoledge-based Systems, LNCS 286. Berlin:Springer.179-188
    [98]宋振明.基于格蕴涵代数的的智能控制中的不确定性推理研究.西南交通大学研究生博士学位论文.1998
    [99]宋士吉,吴澄.模糊推理的反向三Ⅰ算法.中国科学(E),2002,32(2):230-246
    [100]施明辉,周昌乐.一种用ANN实现带权不确定性推理方法.哈尔滨工业大学学报,2007,39(9):1491-1495
    [101]Takeuti G., Titani S. Intuitionistic fuzzy logic and intuitionistic fuzzy set theory. Journal of Symbolic Logic,1984,49:851-866
    [102]Takeuti G., Titani S. Global intuitionistic fuzzy set theory. A. Di Nola, A. G. S. Ventre (Eds.), The mathematics of fuzzy systems, Verlag TUV Rheinland Koln,1986:291-302
    [103]Tang Y.C., Zheng J.C. Linguistic modelling based on semantic similarity relation among linguistic labels. Fuzzy Sets and Systems,2006,157:1662-1673
    [104]Viedma E. Herrera, O. Corden, M. Luque, A. G. Lopez, A. M. Munoz. A model of liguistic IRS based on multi-granular linguistic information. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning,2003,34:221-239
    [105]Vychodil V. Truth-depressing hedges and BL-logic. Fuzzy Sets and Systems,2006, 157:2074-2090
    [106]Wu W. M. A multi-valued logic system with respect to T-norms. Gupta M. M., Yamakama T.(Eds.). Fuzzy Computing, North-Holland, Amsterdam,1988:101-118
    [107]王元元.计算机科学中的逻辑学.北京:科学出版杜,1989
    [108]吴望名.区间值模糊集和区间值模糊推理.模糊系统与数学,1992,6(2):38-49
    [109]吴望名.模糊推理的原理和方法.贵州:贵州科技出版社,1994
    [110]汪培庄.真值流推理及其动态分析.北京师范大学学报(自然科学版),1989,25(1):1-12
    [111]汪培庄,张洪敏,白明,张民Fuzzy推理机与真值流推理.模糊系统与数学,1992,6(2):1-9
    [112]王国俊.模糊命题演算的一种形式演绎系统.科学通报,1997,42(10):1041-1045
    [113]Wang G. J. On the logic foundation of fuzzy reasoning. Information Sciences,1999, 117:47-88
    [114]王国俊.模糊推理的全蕴涵三I算法.中国科学(E辑),1999,29(1):43-53
    [115]王国俊.非经典数理逻辑与近似推理.北京:科学出版社,2000
    [116]王国俊.三I方法与区间值模糊推理.中国科学(E辑),2000,30(4):331-340
    [117]王国俊Lukasieicz逻辑系统中的广义重言式.西南交通大学学报,2000,35(5):558-563
    [118]王国俊.广义MP规则.陕西师范大学学报(自然科学版),2000,28(3):1-9
    [119]王万森,何华灿.基于泛逻辑学的逻辑关系柔性化研究.软件学报,2005,16(5):754-760
    [120]吴洪博,邵晓丽.完备剩余格中的全蕴涵推理方法.数学进展,2006,35(3):303-314
    [121]Wu Z.J., Liu X., Zou L., Xu Y. Transformation of Linguistic Truth Values During the Sensor Evaluation. Proceedings of the ICFIE, ASC 40,2007:744-750
    [122]王国胤,张清华.不同知识粒度下粗糙集的不确定性研究.计算机学报,2009,31(9):1588-1598
    [123]徐扬,秦克云.格H蕴涵代数和格蕴涵代数类.河北煤炭工程学院学报,1992,3:139-143
    [124]徐扬.格蕴涵代数.西南交通大学学报,1993,28(1):20-27
    [125]徐扬,秦克云.格值命题逻辑(I).西南交通大学学报,1993,1(2):123-128
    [126]Xu Y., Qin K. Y. On the characteristic of proper lattice implication algebras. Chinese Quarterly J. of Mathematics,1994,9(4):14-17
    [127]徐扬,乔全喜,陈超平,秦克云.不确定性推理.成都:西南交通大学出版社,1994
    [128]徐扬,秦克云,宋振明.格值一阶逻辑的FM算法.科学通报,1997,10:1052-1055
    [129]Xu Y, Qin K.Y. On semantic of first-order lattice-valued logic system FM. System Analysis Modeling and Simulation, Germany,1997
    [130]Xu Y, Qin K.Y, Liu J., Song Z.M. L-valued Propositional Logic Lvpl. Information Sciences,1999,114:205-235
    [131]Xu Y., Ruan D., Kerre E.E., Liu J. α—Reasolution priciple based on lattice-valued logic LP(X). Information Sciences,2000,130:195-223
    [132]Xu Y., Liu J., Song Z.M., Qin K.Y. On semantics of L-valued first-order logic Lvfl. International Journal of Gen. Systems,2000,29 (1):53-79
    [133]Xu Y., Ruan D., Liu J. Approximate reasoning based on lattice-valued propositional logic Lvpl, Fuzzy If-Then rules in computational intelligence. Ruan, D., Kerre, E.E. (Eds.), Fuzzy Sets Theory and Applications. Kluwer Academic Publishers,2000, 81-105
    [134]Xu Y., Liu J., Song Z.M., Qin K.Y On semantics of L-valued first-order logic Lvfl. International Journal of General Systems,2000,29(1):53-79
    [135]Xu Y., Song Z.M., Qin K.Y., Liu J. Syntax of L-valued first-order logic Lvfl. International Journal of Multiple-Valued Logic,2001,7:213-257
    [136]Xu Y., Kerre E.E., Ruan D., Song Z.M. Fuzzy Reasoning Based on the Extension Principle. International Journal of Intelligent Systems.2001.16(4):469-495
    [137]Xu Y., Liu J., Ruan D., Li W. J. Fuzzy Reasoning Based on Generalized Fuzzy IF-THEN Rules. International Journal of Intelligent Systems,2002,17(10):977-1006
    [138]Xu Y., Chen S.W. and Ma J. Linguistic Truth-valued Lattice Implication Algebra and Its Properties. Proc. of CESA2006 conference,2006:1413-1418
    [139]Xu Y., Liu J., Ruan D., Lee T.T. On the consistency of rule bases based on Lattice-Valued first-order logic LF(X). International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 2006,21:399-424
    [140]Xu Y., Chen S.W., Liu J., Ruan D. Weak Completeness of Resolution in a Linguistic Truth-Valued Propositional Logic. Proceedings of the IFSA 2007 World Congress on theoretical advances and applications of fuzzy logic and soft computing, Cancun, Mexico, June 18-21,2007. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heilin Heidelberg 2007.2007: 358-366
    [141]Xu Y, Li X.B., Liu J., Ruan D. Determination of a-Resolution for Lattice-Valued First-order Logic Based on Lattice Implication Algebra. Proceedings of the 2007 International Conference on Intelligent Systems and Knowledge Engineering, Chengdu, October 15-16,2007:1567-1574
    [142]Xu Y., Ruan D., Qin K.Y., Liu J. Lattice-Valued Logic-An alternative approach to treat fuzziness and incomparability. Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing, Vol.132. Berlin:Springer,2003
    [143]Xu Y., Liu J., Luis Martinez, Ruan D. Some views on information fusion and logic based approaches in decision making under uncertainty. Journal of Universal Computer Sciences,2010,16(1):3-21
    [144]Xu Y, Liu J., Ruan D., Li X.B. Determination of a-reasolution in lattice-valued first-order logic LF(X). Information Sciences,2010, doi:10.1016/j. ins.2010.03.024
    [145]Yager R.R. Using approximate reasoning to represent default knowledge. Artificial Intelligence,1987.31:99-112
    [146]Yager R. R. Uncertainty reasoning and conflict resolution. Interational Journal of Approximate Reasoning,2000,25:15-42
    [147]Yager R.R. A framework for reasoning with soft information. Information Sciences, 2010,180(8):1390-1406
    [148]Yeung D.S., Tsang E.C.C. Weighted fuzzy production rules. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1997.88 (3):299-313
    [149]Tsang E. C. C. Yeung D. S. Modelling fuzzy production rules with fuzzy expert networks. Expert Systems with Applications.1997.17(3):169-178
    [150]Yashin A.D. A modeified neighborhovd semantics for strong future tense operator in intuitionistic propositional logic. Abstracts of Logic Colloquium'97, Leeds, England, 1997
    [151]伊良忠.格蕴涵代数及语言真值不确定性推理研究.西南交通大学研究生博士学位论文.2007
    [152]朱梧槚,肖奚安.中介逻辑的命题演算系统(I).自然杂志,1985,8(4):315
    [153]朱梧槚,肖奚安.中介逻辑的命题演算系统(II).自然杂志,1985,8(5):394
    [154]朱梧槚,肖奚安.中介逻辑的命题演算系统(III).自然杂志,1985,8(6):473
    [155]朱梧槚,肖奚安.中介逻辑的谓词演算系统(I).自然杂志,1985,8(7):540
    [156]朱梧槚,肖奚安.中介逻辑的谓词演算系统(II).自然杂志,1985,8(8):601
    [157]Zenzo S. Di. A new many-valued logic and its applications to approximate reasoning. H. Kugler, Information Processing 86. North Holland, Amsterdam,1986:421-427
    [158]Zadeh L.A. Fuzzy sets. Inf. Control,1965,8:338-353
    [159]Zadeh L.A. Fuzzy logic and approximate reasoning. Syntheses,1975,30:407-428
    [160]Zadeh L. A. The concept of linguistic variable and application to approximate reasoning, Part Ⅰ. Information Science,1975,8:199-249
    [161]Zadeh L. A. The concept of linguistic variable and application to approximate reasoning, Part II. Information Science,1975,8:301-357
    [162]Zadeh L. A. The concept of linguistic variable and application to approximate reasoning. Part III. Information Science.1975,9:43-80
    [163]Zadeh L. A. Fuzzy logic=Computing with words. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Systems,1996, 4(2):103-111
    [164]周平,姜明,徐扬.格值一阶逻辑LF(X)中的广义量词.模糊系统与数学,2006,20(5):96-100
    [165]周平,姜明,徐扬.格值一阶逻辑系统LF(X)中带广义量词的不确性推理.模糊系统与数学,2007,21(2):40-45
    [166]周平.基于格蕴涵代数的格值逻辑中的近似推理研究.西南交通大学研究生博士学位论文.2007
    [167]周平,姜明,徐扬.LF(X)中带广义量词的可靠性定理.模糊系统与数学,2008,22(2):31-35
    [168]Zou L., Liu X., Xu Y. Resolution method of linguistic truth-valued propositional logic. Proceedings of 2005 International Conference on Neural Networks and Brain,2005,3: 1996-1999
    [169]Zou L., Pradip K. Das, Xu Y. Meng D. Soft-resolution method of linguistic hedges lattice-valued first-order logic.8th Joint Conference on Information Sciences, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA, July 21-26,2005:136-139
    [170]Zou L., Ma J., Xu Y. A Framework of Linguistic Truth-Valued Propositional Logic Based on Lattice Implication Algebra. Proceedings of 2006 International Conference on Granudar Computing, Atlanta, USA, May 10-12,2006:574-577
    [171]Zou L., Liu J., Xu Y. Satisfiability Problem of Linguistic Truth-Valued Propositional Logic Based on LIA. Proceedings of the Eurofuse Workshop:New Trends In Preference Modelling, Jaen, Spain. April 11-13,2007:105-109
    [172]Zou L., Liu X., Xu Y. Six-Element Linguistic Truth-Valued Intuitionistic Propositional Logic. Journal of Information & Computational Science,2008,5(5):2275-2280
    [173]Zou L., Sun F., Xu Y. Resolution Method of Six-Element Linguistic Truth-Valued Intuitionistic Propositional Logic. Proceedings of Intelligent System and Knowledge Engineering, XiaMen, China. IEEE Press.2008:141-145
    [174]Zou L., Liu X., Wu Z.J., Xu Y. A Uniform Approach of Linguistic Truth Values in Sensor Evaluation. Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, Springer,2008,7(4): 87-397
    [175]周昌乐.认知逻辑导论.清华大学出版社,广西科学技术出版社,2001.5
    [176]朱福喜,陈自立,桂起权.次协调逻辑与人工智能.武汉:武汉大学出版社,2002.7
    [177]朱华,赵建彬,徐扬.剩余格蕴涵代数中的素理想.郑州大学学报(自科版),2006,38(2):25-28