两个杨树无性系再生体系的建立及抗虫基因Cry1C+9C转化的初步研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
杨树作为三大速生树种之一,在湖北省林业产业中具有重要的地位。杨树无性系LH05-143、SN04-31和LN05-51作为F1代杂交无性系,在湖北省石首市杨树研究所试验林中生长表现良好,具有一定超亲优势,并已经进入品种鉴定阶段。
     本论文以杨树无性系LH05-143和SN04-31叶柄为外植体,建立了2个无性系的再生体系,并以杨树无性系LN05-51为受体材料,开展了农杆菌介导下的抗虫基因Cry1C+9C转化初步研究,获得了主要研究结果如下:
     1.以无性系LH05-143为研究对象,得出再生体系的最佳外植体为叶柄。叶柄的最佳消毒方法为:75%酒精消毒30s后灭菌水清洗2-3次,再用0.1%HgCl2消毒5min,LH05-143的污染率为10%,褐化率为5%。
     2.在诱导愈伤组织的研究中,叶柄的放置方式对愈伤诱导率影响不显著,但诱导愈伤数存在显著差异,并最终确定杨树无性系再生材料叶柄的放置方式以横放最佳。
     3.间接再生诱导中,LH05-143和SN04-31的最佳愈伤诱导培养基配方均为MS+6-BA 0.2mg/L+NAA 1.0mg/L,此时获得的愈伤组织紧实,颜色浅绿;在获得愈伤组织的分化试验中,发现LH05-143的最佳分化培养基配方为MS+6-BA 0.5mg/L+NAA0.1mg/L,而SN04-31则为MS+6-BA 1.0mg/L+NAA 0.1mg/L。
     4.直接再生过程中,本文利用二次回归正交试验设计优化了LH05-143不定芽分化试验中激素6-BA(x1)和NAA(x2)的浓度及配比,获得了二次回归方程y=2.5699+0.4101x1-0.2694x2+0.0093x1x2-0.9183x12-0.2537x22
     并通过方程得到了关于LH05-143不定芽分化的最佳激素浓度为6-BA1.75mg/L、NAA 0.30mg/L;对SN04-31的不定芽诱导采用了双因素试验,得到其最佳分化培养基配方为MS+6-BA 0.5mg/L+NAA 0.1mg/L。
     5.所得不定芽的继代增殖试验中,LH05-143的最佳培养基配方为MS+蔗糖30g/L+琼脂6g/L+6-BA 0.1mg/L+NAA 0.05mg/L,SN04-31的最佳培养基配方为MS+蔗糖30g/L+琼脂7g/L+6-BA 0.1mg/L+NAA 0.02mg/L。
     6.LH05-143的最佳生根培养基配方为1/2MS+IBA 0.5mg/L,SN04-31的最佳生根培养基配方为1/2MS+IBA 0.2mg/L。
     7.进行了杨树无性系LN05-51叶片不定芽分化和无菌苗生根的卡那霉素敏感性试验,确定了叶片分化的临界浓度为20mg/L,生根的临界浓度为15 mg/L。
     8.对转化过程中农杆菌的抑制试验发现最佳的抑菌措施是在筛选培养基中添加头孢霉素400mg/L,另在培养基表层覆盖一层灭菌滤纸,并需要及时更换培养基。
     9.采用叶盘法,对无性系LN05-51进行了抗虫基因Cry1C+9C的转化,发现在共培培养基中添加乙酰丁香酮对抗性苗的获得不存在显著影响。
Poplar is one of three fast-growing trees, it has an important position in the forestry industry in Hubei Province. Clones of'LH05-143','SN04-31'andLN05-51 are F1 hybrid generations, which grew well at the Institute of Experimental Forest of Populus in 'Shishou'City, Hubei Province. It also has significant heterosis, and has been testing of cultivars identification.
     In the experiment, the regeneration systems have established from petioles of 2 poplar clones(LH05-143 and SN04-31),and we also have study on transformation system of clone LN05-51,which transforms the insect-resistant gene Cry1C+9C by Agrobacterium. The main results that we have are summarized as follow:
     1.In the experiment of regeneration, the petioles of poplar were the best explants. The optimal sterilizing methods of petioles were dipping to 75% Ethanol for 30sec, and then were washed by steriled water 2 or 3 times, and then treating with 0.1% HgCl2 for 5min, the rate of contamination was 10%, and the rate of browning was 5% also.
     2.In the study of callus induction, the placement of the petioles had no significant effect on the rate of callus induction, but the number of induced callus were significantly different.and ultimately we choosed the style horizontally of the petioles of poplar clones as the best type in order to induce callus.
     3.In the indirect induction of regeneration, the optimal callus indcuction medium of LH05-143 and SN04-31 was MS+6-BA 0.2mg/L+NAA 1.0mg/L, and the callus were tight with green color. In another experiments, the optimal medium for the regenertion of LH05-143 from the callus was MS+6-BA 0.5mg/L+NAA 0.1mg/L, and SN04-31 was MS+6-BA 1.0mg/L+NAA 0.1mg/L.
     4. Optimal concentrations of 6-BA and NAA and their combinations were tested with quadratic regressive orthogonal design for their effect on the introduction for the adventitious shoots of Poplar clone LH05-143.We get a regression equation: y=2.5699+0.4101x1-0.2694x2+0.0093x1x2-0.9183x12-0.2537x22 Results showed that the best combination of the 6-BA and NAA was 1.75mg/L and 0.30mg/L. On the study of adventitious buds regeneration of SN04-31,the results showed that the optimal medium was MS+6-BA 0.5mg/L+NAA 0.1mg/L.
     5.In the experiment of adventitious bud multiplication,the optimal medium for LH05-143 is MS+sucrose 30g/L+agar 6g/L+6-BA 0.1mg/L+NAA 0.05mg/L, and the optimal medium for SN04-31 is MS+sucrose 30g/L+Agar 7g/L+6-BA 0.1mg/L+ NAA 0.02mg/L.
     6.The optimal medium of rooting for LH05-143 is 1/2MS+IBA 0.5mg/L, and the mudium for SN04-31 is 1/2MS+IBA 0.2mg/L.
     7.Kanamycin sensitive experiments showed that the critical kanamycin sensitive concentrantions for inducing shoots and rooting of the poplar clone LN05-51 were 20mg/L and 15 mg/L.
     8.The best anti-bacterial methods for the transformation by Agrobacterium:selective medium with cefotaxime 400mg/L, and covered with a layer in the medium surface, and also need to chage the medium in time.
     9.By using Agrobacterium tumefaciens mediated to transformate the insect-resistant gene Cry1C+9C,there were no significant effects with acetosyringone.
引文
1.毕影东,杨传平.生物技术在林木遗传育种中的应用.世界林业研究,2007,20:23-28
    2.蔡诚,吴大强,纵方,等.正交设计在杨树最佳遗传转化体系的建立.核农学报,2008,22(2):136-140
    3.曹新祥,韩小云.植物组织培养中pH值.杭州师范学院学报(自然科学版),2003,1:60-63
    4.陈彩霞,沈昕,王祎宁,等.派间杂种110杨再生系统的建立.林业科学研究,2007,20(2):287-291
    5.陈菲,李黎,宫伟.植物组织培养的防褐化探讨.北方园艺,2005,2:69-71
    6.陈维伦,杨善英,郭东红.一种以黄化法为基础提高毛白杨快速繁殖效率的新方法.植物学报,1991,33:14-18
    7.陈颖,韩一凡,李铃,等.苏云金杆菌杀虫晶体蛋白基因转化美洲黑杨的研究.林业科学,1995,31(2):97-103
    8.程云.黑杨派无性系SN05-11和LN05-51再生体系的研究.[硕士学位论文].武汉:华中农业大学图书馆,2009
    9.杜克久,郑均宝,徐振华,等.741杨器官、体细胞胚胎发生的细胞组织学及生理学的研究.林业科学,1998,34(6):99-103
    10.龚峥.杨树杂交品系NC5331再生植株诱导和离体繁殖的研究.广东林业科技,1995,11(3):34-37
    11.顾万春.森林遗传资源学概论.北京:中国科学技术出版社,1998
    12.郭同斌.转基因杨树对杨小舟蛾杀虫活性及其机理研究.[博士学位论文].南京:南京林业大学图书馆,2005
    13.韩美丽,陆荣生,李耿光.遗传转化技术在树木育种上的研究进展.林业科学,1997,33(1):126-131
    14.韩秀慧,尹伟伦,王华芳.二次回归正交设计在微型月季组织培养中的应用.林业科学,2004,4(40):189-192
    15.郝贵霞,朱祯,朱之悌.豇豆蛋白酶抑制剂基因转化毛白杨的研究.植物学报,1999,41(12):1276-1282
    16.郝贵霞,朱祯,朱之锑.转水稻半胧氨酸蛋白酶抑制剂基因毛白杨的获得.高技术通讯,1999,1:117-121
    17.郝贵霞,朱祯,朱之锑.杨树基因工程进展.生物工程进展,2000,20:6-10
    18.黑龙江林业科学研究院林业研究所.花药离体培养杨树单倍体植株.遗传学报,1976,3(2):145-149
    19.柯善强.植物细胞的遗传全能性与细胞组织培养形态发生控制.武汉植物研究,1987,5(3):303-311
    20.孔祥生,张妙霞,杜爱玲.甜柿离体快繁技术研究.华中农业大学学报,1998,17(2):178-186
    21.李洪清,李美茹.影响农杆菌介导植物基因转化的因素问题.植物生理学通讯,1999,35:145-151
    22.李科友,樊军峰,赵忠,等.84K杨再生和遗传转化体系的优化.西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版),2007,35(7):90-96
    23.李玲,韩一凡.杨树对卡那霉素(Kanamycin)敏感性的测定.林业科学,1992,28(1):95-96
    24.李明亮,张辉,胡建军,等.转Bt基因和蛋白酶抑制剂基因杨树抗虫性研究.林业科学,2000,36(2):93-106
    25.李子银,胡会庆.农杆菌介导的植物遗传转化进展.生物工程进展,1998,18(1):22-26
    26.林善枝,肖基浒,张志毅.杨树抗性基因工程研究进展.北京林业大学学报,2000,22(6):85-88
    27.刘彩霞,孙振元,刘军,等.利用二次回归正交设计优化香石竹叶片再生体系中6-BA和NAA的浓度组合.核农学报,2008,22(1):45-48
    28.刘继红,徐小勇,邓秀新.柑橘体细胞杂种及其核质遗传研究进展.农业生物技术学报,2004,12(3):237-246
    29.刘静宇,余建秀,汤慕瑾,等.苏云金杆菌类杀虫晶体蛋白及其特征.生物工程进展,2002,22(2):44-47
    30.刘美青,李淑玲.杨树抗性研究的现状及展望.河北农业大学学报,1998,32(3):253-257
    31.刘志学,张旭.用LBA4404/pCAMBIA系列转化水稻的最佳条件.复旦大学学报,1999,38(4):439-443
    32.卢孟柱,胡建军.我国转基因杨树的研究及应用现状.林业科技开发,2006,20(6):1-4
    33.马常耕.我国杨树杂交育种的现状和发展对策.林业科学,1995,31:60-69
    34.潘明建.杨树遗传转化的初步研究.中国林木遗传育种进展,1993,257-261
    35.秦光华,姜岳忠.中国和外来杨属种质资源.山东林业科技,2006,6:60-63
    36.饶红宇,陈英,黄敏仁,等.杨树NL-80106转Bt基因植株的获得及抗虫性.植物资源与环境学报,2000,2:1-5
    37.任建茹.杨树组织培养综述.山西林业,1996,4:20-22
    38.沈周高,项艳,蔡诚,等.3个杨树品种叶片再生体系的建立.林业科学,2006,90-96
    39.沈周高.杨树优良无性系再生体系的建立及NASHOR1基因转化的研究.[硕士学位论文].合肥:安徽农业大学图书馆,2007
    40.司少鹏,周萍,陈家美.84K杨树的离体快速繁殖试验.江苏林业科技,2002,29(3):28-29
    41.苏晓华,丁昌俊,马常耕.我国杨树育种的研究进展及对策.林业科学研究,2010,23:31-37
    42.田颖川,虞红梅,郑均宝,等.欧州黑杨转抗虫基因的研究.生物工程学报,1993,9(4):291-297
    43.王明庥主编.林木遗传育种学.北京:中国林业出版社,2001
    44.王萍,吴颖,季静,等.抗生素对大豆愈伤组织的诱导和生长的影响.遗传,2001,23(4):321-324
    45.王善平,许智宏.木本植物的原生质体培养.细胞生物学杂志,1989,11:14-18
    46.王善平,许农,许智宏,等.利用PGE法对Gus基因在几种杨树原生质体中瞬间表达的研究.实验生物学报,1991,24(1):71-73
    47.王善平,许智宏,卫志明.毛白杨叶外植体的遗传转化.植物学报,1990,32(3):172-177
    48.王学聘,韩一凡,戴莲韵,等.抗虫转基因欧美杨的培育.林业科学,1997,13(1):69-74
    49.王永芳,高宝嘉,郑钧宝,等.杨树抗虫基因工程研究进展.河北林果研究,2001,16(1):83-90
    50.王志斌,李学勇,郭三堆.植物凝集素与抗虫基因工程.生物技术通报,1998,33(2):5-10
    51.魏伟,钱迎倩,马克平.害虫对转基因Bt作物的抗性及其管理对策.应用与环境生物学报,1999,5(2):215-228
    52.伍宁丰,范云六.含苏云金芽抱杆菌杀虫蛋白基因的杨树工程植株的建立.科学通报,1991,36(9):705-708
    53.伍宁丰,孙芹.抗虫的转AaIT基因杨树的获得.生物工程学报,2000,16(2):129-133
    54.谢利娟,韩蕾,钱永强,等.爆仗竹组培快繁6-BA与NAA组合浓度配比优化分析核农学报,2005,19(3):181-185
    55.谢先芝.抗虫转基因植物的研究进展及前景.生物工程进展,1999,19(6):47-51
    56.徐妙珍,吴克贤,解奇明.杨树组织离体培养育苗初获成功.林业科技通讯,1987,12:1-2
    57.徐纬英主编.杨树.哈尔滨:黑龙江人民出版社,1988
    58.续九如,黄智慧.林业试验设计.北京:中国林业出版社,1995
    59.姚娜.不同基因型毛白杨离体再生及细胞悬浮培养的比较研究.[硕士学位论文].北京:北京林业大学图书馆,2007
    60.尹伟伦,刘玉军,刘强,等.木本植物基因组研究.北京林业大学学报,2002,24(21):244-248
    61.于学宁,曹帮华,曹玉翠,等.741杨离体快繁和叶片再生体系的建立.山东科学,2008,21(1):35-38
    62.于志水,金红,筒胜军,等.黑杨派杨树组培再生系统的研究.辽宁林业科技,2002,(6):11-13
    63.余家林,肖枝洪.多元统计及SAS应用.武汉大学出版社,2008
    64.余忠明.杨树在水土保持应用中存在的问题及对策.中国水土保持,2005,3:27-34
    65.詹亚光.杨树花药培养筛选耐盐变异体的研究.植物研究,1994,14(1):98-103
    66.张冰玉,苏晓华,郑书星.山新杨叶片高频率植株再生体系建立及其遗传稳定性.北京林学大学学报,2008,30(3):68-73
    67.张静.杨树再生体系的建立及Bar基因转化的研究.[硕士学位论文].合肥:安徽农业大学图书馆,2005
    68.张望东,张绮纹.群众杨悬浮细胞系的建立和耐盐体细胞变异体的初步筛选.林业科学,1994,5:412-418
    69.张献龙,李涛,孙济中.抗生素对棉花愈伤组织诱导和生长的影响.华中农业大学学报,1996,15(2):123-126
    70.张智奇,周音,王少欧,等.抗虫基因及其在植物上的应用.吉林农业大学学报,1996,18(1):91-95
    71.赵国凡.植物组织培养概论.大连工学院出版社,1988
    72.赵鑫,詹立平,刘桂丰.杨树基因工程抗性育种研究进展.东北林业大学学报,2004,32(6):76-79
    73.赵华燕,卢善发,晁瑞堂.杨树的组织培养及其基因工程研究.植物学通报,2001,18(2):169-176
    74.郑进.BtCry1A基因转化中嘉8号杨的研究.[硕士学位论文].武汉:华中师范大学图书馆,2006
    75.郑均宝,张玉满,杨文芝,等.741杨离体叶片再生及抗虫基因转化.河北农业大学学报,1995,118(3):20-25
    76.郑均宝,梁海永,高宝嘉.转双抗虫基因741毛白杨的选择及抗虫性.林业科学,2000,36(2):13-19
    77.郑世锴主编.杨树丰产在培育病虫害防治.北京:金盾出版社,1996
    78.朱大保.国外杨树组培微繁技术的进展.北京林业大学学报,1990,12(1):84-91
    79.朱新生,朱玉贤.抗虫植物基因工程研究进展.植物学报,1997,39(3):282-288
    80.左丽丽.山新杨转Bt+蜘蛛杀虫肽基因的研究.[硕士学位论文].吉林:东北林业大学图书馆,2009
    81.Ahuja M R. Gene transfer in forest trees.In:Hanover J W, Keathley D E eds.Genetic Manipulation of Woody Plants,1988,New York:Plenum Press,25-41
    82.Ahuja M R. Micropagation of woody plants.Dordreeht.Klauwer Academic Publishers,1993:187-194
    83.A K Thakur, D K Srivastava. High-efficiency plant regeneration from leaf explants of male Himalayan poplar(Populus ciliata WALL.).In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology-Plant,2006,42:144-147
    84.Birch R G, Bower R. Particle bombardment technology for gene transfer. Oxford University Press. NewYork,1994
    85.Berbee F M et al.Induction of callus and tree from stem tip cultures of a hybrid poplar. In Vitro,1972,7:269
    86.Benjamn Hernandez-Campuzano et al.Expression of a spider venom peptide in transgenic Tobacco confers in sect resistance. Elsevier Science,2008:1-7
    87. Chalupa V.The use of regenerants from tissue culture in plant breeding. Czech Acad Sci, Prague 1977,183-193
    88.Chalupa V. In vitro propagation of some broadleaved forest trees. Commun Inst For Czech,1979,11:159-170
    89.Chupeau M C,pautot V, Chupeau Y.Recovery of transgenic trees after elsctroporation of Polar protoplasts. Transgenic Res,1994,3(1):13-19
    90.Confalonieri M et al. Genetic transformation of Populus nigra by Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Plant Cell Reports,1994,13:256-261
    91.Confalonieri M, Balestrazzi A, Cella R. Genetic transformation of Populus deltoids and P. x euraoericana clones using Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture,1997,48:53-61
    92.Devantier Y A, Moffat B,Jones C et al.Microprojectile-mediated DNA delivery to the Salicaceaefamily. Can. J.Bot.1993,71(11):1458-1466
    93.Dmytro P. Yevtushenko. Wound-inducible promoter from poplar is responsive to fungalinfection in transgenic potato. Plant Science,2004,167:715-724
    94.Fillatti J J, Sellmer J, McCown B et al.Agrobacterium mediated transformation and regeneration of Populus.Mol Gen Genet,1987,206:192-199
    95.G. Franklin, M. Oliveira, A.C.P Dias. Production of transgenic Hypericum perforatum plants via particle bombardment-mediated transformation of novel organogenic cell suspension cultures. Plant Science,2007,172:1193-1203
    96. G.Sujatha, B.D Ranjitha Kumari. Micropropagation, encapsulation and growth of Artemisia vulgaris node explants for germplasm preservation. South African Journal of Botany,2008,74:93-100
    97.Gullner G,Komives T, Rennenberg H. Enhanced tolerance of transgenic poplar over expressing gama-glutamylcystenine synthetase towards choroacetanilide herbicide. J. ExP. Bot,2001,52:971-979
    98.G. Vengandesan, A. Ganapathi, S.Amutha et al.High-frequency plant regeneration from cotyledon callus of Acacia sinuta(Lour.)Merr. In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology-Plant,2003,39(1):28-33
    99.Horsh R B,Fry J E, Hoffman N et al.A simple and general method for transferring genes into Plants. Science,1985,227:1229-1231
    100.Huang F H, Li X Y. Effeets of concentration of acetosyringone and Agrobacterium tumefaciens on Gus gene transformation efficiency of Populus.In Vitro Cell Dev Biol,1994,30A(3,Part):67-74
    101.Ho we G T, Goldfarb B,Strauss S H. Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of hybrid Poplar suspension cultures and regeneration of transformed Plants.Plant Cell Tissue Org Cult,1994,36:59-71
    102.Huetteman C A, Preece J E. Thidazuron:a potent cytokin for woody plant tissue culture. Plant Cell Tissue Org Cult,1993,33:105-119
    103.Jafari M A, J. Kiss et al.High-efficiency callus induction and plant-regeneration in petiole culture of 4 poplar genotypes. Acta Biologica Hungarica,1995,46(1):51-59
    104.Knight P J K, Criehmore N et al.The receptor for Bacillus thuringiensis CrylA(c) delta-endotoxin in the brush border membrane of the Lepidoptera Manduca sexta is aminopeptiase N. Mol Microbiol,1994,11:429-430
    105.Kurioka M. Transformation of Acropa belladonna. Plant Cell Reports,1992,12:1-6
    106.Leple J C et al.Transgenic poplars:expression of chimeric genes using four different constructs. Plant Cell Reports,1992,11:137-141
    107.Leple J C, Bonade-Bottino M, Augustin S et al.Toxieity to Chrysomela tremulae (Coleoptera:Chrysomelidae) of transgenic poplars expressing a cysteine proteinase in hibitor. Moleeular Breeding,1995,1(4):319-328
    108.Massimo D, Gianni A, Beatrice B et al.Transformation of white poplar Populus alba L. with a novel Arabidopsis thaliana cysteine proteinase inhibitor and analysis of insect pest resistance.Molecular Breeding,2001,7:35-42
    109.McCown B H, McCabe D E, Russell D R et al. Stable transformation of Populus and incorporation of pest resistance by electric discharge particle acceleration. Plant Cell Reports,1991,9:590-594
    110.Mcnabb H S.A field trial of transgenic bybrid Poplar trees:estahlishment and growth through the second season. Agriculture Rasearch Institute,1991,(9):155-159
    111.Michael R. Davey et al. Plant protoplasts:status and biotechnological perspectives. Biotechnology Advances,2005,23:131-171
    112.Mussio I, Rusing A.M.Morphgenetic responses from protoplasts and tissue culture of Laminaria digitata(Linnaeus) J.V. Lamouroux(Laminariales, Phaeophyta):callus and thalloid-like stuctures regeneration. Journal of applied phycology,2009,2:225-264
    113.Parson T J et al. Transformation of poplar by Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Biotechology,1986,4(6):533-536
    114.Peng S H, Takahata Y, Hara M et al.Effeets of the matric potential of culture medium on plant regeneration of embryo derived from microspore of Brassica nopus.J Shita, 1994,7:114-150
    115.Prakash E, Sha Valli Khan P S, Sairam Reddy P et al.Regeneration of plants from seed-derived callus of Hybanthus enneaspermus L. Muell.A rare ethnobotanical herb. Plant Cell Rep,1999,18:873-878
    116.Priyanka Srivastava, Rakhi Chaturvedi.In vitro and rogenesis in tree species:An update and prospect for further research. Biotechnology Advances,2008(26):482-491
    117.Riemenschneider D E. Susceptibility of intra and inter specific hybrid poplars to Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain C58.Phytopathology,1990,80:1099-1102
    118.Ramage C,Williams R R. Mineral lqutrition and plant morphogenesis. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol.Plant,2002,38:116-124
    119.Sarwar M, Skirvin R M. Effect of thidiazuron and 6-benzylaminopurine on adventitious shoot regeneration from leaves of three strains of'Melntosh'apple (Malus x domestica Borkh)in vitro. Sci Hort,1997,68:95-100
    120.Wang JianGe et al.Multiple transgenes Populus x euramericana'Guariento'plants obtained by biolistic bombardment. Molecular Biology,2007,2(52):224-230
    121.Sehuler T H. Inseet-resistance transgenic plants. Trends in biotechnology,1996, (16):168-175
    122.Sangadala S, Walters F S et al.A mixture of Manduca sexta aminopeptidase and phosphatase enhances Bacillus thuringiensis insecticidal CryIA(e) toxin binding and 86Rb+-K+ offlux in vitro. J. Biol Chem,1994,269:10088-10092
    123.Sellmer J C.Examin and Manipulation of populous Cell Competence For direcet gene transfer. Ph. D Dissertion. University of Wisconsin,1991,Madisin Madision, WI, USA
    124.Sehlumbaum A, Maueh F, Vogeli U et al.Plant chitinases are potent in hibitors of fungal growth. Nature,1986,324:365-367
    125.Stachel S E, Nerster E W, Zambryski P C.A plant cell factor induces Agrobacterium tumefaciens vir gene expression. Proc Natl Acad Sci.USA,1986,83(2):379-383
    126.Vadlamudi R K, Weber E et al.Cloning and expression of a receptor for an insecticidal toxin of Bacillus thuringiensis. Biol Chem,1995,270:5490-5494
    127.Whitehead H C M, Giles K L.Rapid propagation of populus through tissue culture. Newzealand Forest Science,1977,7(1):40-43
    128.Winton L. Tissue culture propagation of European aspen. Forest Sci,1971, 17:348-350
    129.Winton L. Plantets from aspen tissue culture. Science,1986,160:1234-1235
    130.Wang G J, Stefano C, Chen Y et al.Poplar(Populus nigra L.)Plants transformed with a Bacillus thuringensis toxin gene:insecticidalactivity and genome analysis. Transgenic Res,1996, (5):281-301
    131.WANG Hui-mei, LIU Hong-mei, WANG Wen-jie et al.Effects of Thidiazuron, basal medium and light quality on adventitious shoot regeneration from in vitro cultured stem of Populus alba×P.berolinensis. Journal of Forestry Research,2008,19(3): 257-259