摘要
教师惩戒权是教育中一个颇有争议却不容回避的问题。近年来,随着我国教师正当惩戒权的行使屡遭批评和质疑、教师过度体罚行为侵犯学生权利等现象的发生,教师惩戒权日益受到人们的关注。首先,人们对教师惩戒权是否应该存在的问题就产生了分歧,既有赞同的声音也有反对的声音。因而,人们便开始反思教师惩戒权是什么?它有无存在的必要?如果确有存在的必要,那它存在的目的是什么?在多大的限度内,这种权力的行使是正当的、合理合法的?这一系列问题都需要得到合理的回答和解释。因此,本文将以教师惩戒权为研究对象,试图从理论上对上述一系列问题进行分析和回答。
本文将从对教师惩戒权面临的危机表征开始展开讨论,并对其产生的原因进行分析。接下来,便从理论上对教师戒权进行本体追问,从教师戒权的相关概念出发对教师戒权的涵义、特征进行探讨,并对教师惩戒权的正当性分别从哲学、教育学、心理学的视角对其进行解读。最后,对教师惩戒权的实践情况进行历史寻踪和分析,并对教师惩戒权正当行使的限度进行分析。本论文是对教师惩戒权的理论建构的一点尝试,以期为我国教师惩戒权的理论研究和实践探索尽绵薄之力。
Teachers’disciplinary power is a fairly controversial, yet unavoidable issue in education. In recent years, teachers’disciplinary power has drawn increasing attention from the public as reasonable exercise of such rights was repeatedly criticized and questioned in this country at the same time that teacher’s excessive corporal punishment also became a regular occurrence. First, people have voiced sharply different opinions on whether teachers should have a disciplinary right: there are those who support it and those who oppose it. This has prompted many to reflect upon some fairly fundamental questions: what exactly is teachers’disciplinary power? Do we need it? If yes, what purpose does it serve? And to what extent is exercise of such a right appropriate, reasonable and lawful?All these questions need to be properly answered and explained. This paper attempts to study teachers’disciplinary power and answer these questions from a theoretical perspective.
First, this paper will dissect the crisis facing teachers’disciplinary power,and analyzing the reasons behind it. Next, it will attempt to question teachers’disciplinary power from a theoretical perspective, explore its implications and its nature by using relevant concepts, and then discuss the appropriateness of teachers’disciplinary power from philosophical, educational and psychological angles; Finally, this paper traces the history of teachers’disciplinary power and analyzes the practice of this right over time. The paper attempts to construct a theoretical framework for teachers’disciplinary power, with the hope that it may contribute to the fundamental research and the practice of teachers’disciplinary power.
引文
[1]李光明.学生课堂上打架致1人死亡,老师冷观继续上课[N].法制日报,2008-7-11.
[2]梁振海.校长三次跪求学生[N].海南经济报,2007-9-24.
[3]黄蔚山,廖伟军等.学生打老师四天三起令人悲哀,尊师重教传统何在[N].羊城晚报,2011-03-17.
[4]李清.这一跪,跪掉了师道尊严[N].今日早报,2010-12-1(10).
[5]侯英丽.慎用惩戒权[J],内蒙古教育,2004(1):52—54.
[6]王鑫.关于教师惩戒权与人性思考[J].克山师专学报,2001(2):78.
[7][8][9]苏霍姆林斯基.怎样培养真正的人[M].蔡汀译.北京:教育科学出版社,1995.184—185.
[10] [33]马卡连柯.论共产主义教育[M].刘长松,杨慕之译.北京:人民教育出版社,1981.170,21-59.
[11]劳凯声.变革社会中的教育权和受教育权:教育法学基本问题研究[M].北京:教育科学出版社,2003.375-376.
[12][14]傅维利.论教育中的惩罚[J].教育研究,2007(10):12-16.
[13]顾明远主编.教育大词典(上)[M].上海:上海教育出版社,1997.176.
[15][16][23]冯建军.教师惩罚权的合理性及其使用[J].思想·理论·教育,2004(10),16-18.
[17][36][46]王辉.论教师惩戒权[J].教育研究与实验,2001(2),36-39.
[18][28][50]转引自蔡春.在权力与权利之间[M].北京:北京师范大学出版社,2004.17-120.
[19]德雅斯贝尔斯.什么是教育[M].邹进译.北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店,1991.4.
[20]柏拉图.理想国[M].郭斌和、张竹明译.北京:商务印书馆,2002.278.
[21][22][31]周浩波.教育哲学[M].北京:人民教育出版社,2000.187-188.
[23]教育权力及其正当性研究[D].翟楠,2008,南京师范大学,49.
[24]王小章.自由、共同体、正当性[J].学术论坛,2005(7),35.
[25][27]赵敦华.人性和伦理的跨文化研究[M].哈尔滨:黑龙江人民出版社,2004.26-50.
[26]孙培青,李国钧主编.中国教育思想史[M].上海:华东师范大学出版社,1995.68-69.
[29]叶澜.教育概论[M].北京:人民教育出版社,1991.8.
[30]陆有铨.躁动的百年[M].济南:山东教育出版社,1997.101.
[32]涂尔干.道德教育[M].陈光金等译.上海:上海人民出版社,2001.309.
[34]施良方.学习论:学习心理学的理论与原理[M].北京:人民教育出版社,2001.125.
[35]叶浩生.西方心理学历史与体系[M].北京:人民教育出版社,1998.118-217.
[37]吴式颖.外国教育史教程[M].北京:人民教育出版社,1998.11.
[38]转引自劳凯声.中国教育法制评论(第3辑)[M].北京:教育科学出版社,2004.203.
[39][40]李冀.教育管理辞典(第二版)[S].海口:海南出版社.2002.450-451.
[41][42]孟卫青,刘飞燕.五个国家体罚立法的比较与启示[J] .外国中小学教育,2009(6),39-41.
[43]徐玉斌,李迤航.教育惩戒在国外[J].河南教育学院学报(哲学社会科学版),2009(3),11.
[44]杨光富.韩国2002年教育改革的三大热点[J].教育研究,2003(3),35.
[45]日本学校暴力事件大增安倍晋三支持体罚学生[N].新闻晨报2007年1月http://news.qq.com/a/20070131/000622.html.
[47]蔡海龙.作为复合性权利的教师惩戒权——中小学教师惩戒权的权利性质研究[J].中国教育法制评论,2006(4),196.
[48]黄向阳.德育原理[M].上海:华东师范大学出版社.2000.30.
[49]孙彩平.教育道德与道德阈限[J].教育理论与实践, 2002(1),36 .
[51]蔡春.在权力与权利之间[M].北京:北京师范大学出版社.2004.20.
[52]王辉.学校规则及其合法性管窥[J].见:劳凯声.中国教育法制评论(第2辑)[M].北京:教育科学出版社,2003.58.
[53]夸美纽斯.大教学论[M].傅仁敢译.北京:教育科学出版社,1999.198.