蓝狐多重感染的病原学及主要病原的分子生物学特性研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
近年来,随着我国毛皮动物规模化养殖业的不断扩大,由病原细菌所引起的狐类感染,常表现出流行面广、发病率和死亡率高的特点。传染性疾病,尤其是细菌性疾病的多重感染发生日益频繁、越来越普遍,给毛皮动物养殖生产带来了较大的经济损失,严重地威胁到毛皮动物养殖业的持续发展。2006-2007年间,山东6个地区不同狐群养殖场养殖的母狐出现空怀、流产、出血性肺炎等症状病变类似的疫情。为了进一步探讨引起这场规模化狐场发生疾病的原因,本研究开展了流行病学调查,病原学检查,细菌多重感染的状况分析及间接荧光抗体检测等方法的建立,并对其主要病原进行16SrRNA序列测定和系统进化性分析,为规模化种狐场多重感染的疾病诊断与防治提供了理论依据。
     本研究共分三部分:
     一、规模化蓝狐养殖场细菌感染的病原学检测及其多重感染的状况分析
     2006-2007年间,山东6个地区不同狐群养殖场养殖的母狐出现空怀、流产、出血性肺炎等症状病变类似的疫情,给养殖场造成了巨大经济损失。通过对其养殖场(共计饲养蓝狐2.2万余只)进行流行病学调查,对送检的236只病死蓝狐进行细菌和病毒学检查,及犬瘟热(CDV)、犬细小病毒(CPV)快速诊断试纸条的检测,从被检病料中主要分离到绿脓杆菌(86%)、大肠杆菌(34.3%)、沙门氏菌(25.8%)和普通变形杆菌(8.5%)四种病原菌,病毒检查与试纸条检测皆为阴性,人工感染小鼠的致病性试验结果表明四种病原菌皆为致病菌;通过细菌分离率及共感染率的统计分析,发现病狐群同时存在大肠杆菌、沙门氏菌、普通变形杆菌和绿脓杆菌的二重感染(45.8%)、三重感染(3.8%)、甚至四重感染(0.4%)的情况,尤其是以绿脓杆菌感染为主的多重感染,已成为影响山东地区毛皮动物养殖疫病的主要病因之一。
     二、蓝狐绿脓杆菌主要血清学诊断方法的建立与临床应用
     取上述试验所分离的主要病原菌绿脓杆菌的代表菌株ZB4,分别制备全菌(OK)抗原及菌体(O)抗原,经分别强化免疫接种家兔制备高效价抗血清,进行与待检菌株的玻片凝集反应、免疫荧光抗体反应(IFA)及琼脂扩散试验(AGP)等方面的免疫检验,结果在同种细菌间的荧光抗体检验显示出了特异的黄绿色荧光反应;玻片凝集反应中出现了特异凝集;在琼脂扩散检验中出现特异的免疫沉淀线。本研究建立了蓝狐绿脓杆菌玻板凝集、IFA、AGP的快速诊断方法,补充了传统细菌学检测的方法,为这些病原的快速、准确诊断奠定了基础。
     三、蓝狐绿脓杆菌ZB4株16SrRNA基因的序列测定及系统进化分析
     病原学研究结果表明绿脓杆菌是影响规模化蓝狐养殖场多重感染的主要病原之一,为进一步研究其分子生物学特性,本试验利用原核生物16SrRNA基因通用引物对分离纯化的蓝狐致病性绿脓杆菌菌株ZB4进行16SrRNA基因的克隆及序列分析。采用DNAstar软件将获得的序列与选取的核苷酸同源性较高的序列进行同源性比对,采用MEGA(3.1)软件生成同源序列的进化树。结果显示该菌株与假单胞菌属的9个代表菌株的同源性均很高,在98.7%~99.2%之间,在所构建的系统进化树上,ZB4菌株与绿脓杆菌(Pseudomonas aeruginosa)(AJ249451)的距离最近,位于同一分支,其同源性达99.2%。从分子水平上鉴定菌株ZB4为绿脓杆菌(Pseudomonas aeruginosa)。
In recent years, for large-scaled feeding industry’s unceasing expansion of fur animals, the infection of fox often shows major epidemic areas, higher morbidity and mortality, infectious diseases especially the multiple infection caused by bacteria occurred increasingly frequent, more and more popular, resulted in a great economic loss and threatened the feeding industry’s persistent development of fur animals acutely. From 2006 to 2007, the foxes in different fox farms in 6 areas of Shandong showed non-pregnancy, abortion, hemorrhagic lung fever etc. In order to approach the reasons of the diseases in the large-scaled farms further, the methods of epidemiologic survey, etiologic survey, the analysis of bacterial multiple infectious situation and the detection of fluorescent antibody were established in this research, we made a sequencing of 16SrRNA and analysis of the phyletic evolution for the major etiological agent and provided a theoretical basis in diagnosing disease and prevention and cure for multiple infections in scaled fox farms.
     The research divides three parts:
     Part One: The etiologic survey and analysis of multiple infectious situation of the bacterium in large-scaled alopex farms
     From 2006 to 2007, the foxes in different fox farms in 6 areas of Shandong showed non-pregnancy, abortion, hemorrhagic lung fever etc, resulted in a great economic loss to the farms. By the epidemiologic survey in the farms and the etiologic survey of the 236 dead alopexs collected, four major pathogenic bacteria: aeruginosus bacillus (86%), bacillus coli (34.3%), c (25.8%) and bacillus proteus (8.5%); By the statistical analysis of the infectious state, we can find that there has dual infection, triple infection, and even quartet infection of bacillus coli, bacillus coli, bacillus proteus and aeruginosus bacillus in a considerable proportion of the alopex groups, especially the multiple infection of aeruginosus bacillus, and became a major etiological factor of the fur animals’loimia influenced Shandong.
     Part Two: The establishment of major serodiagnosis method and clinical application of aeruginosus bacillus in alopex
     Using the representative strain of the major pathogenic bacteria, aeruginosus bacillus, from the experiment above-mentioned, prepared whole-cell antigen and thallus antigen respectively and prepared antiserum corresponding by immunizing rabbits respectively, we can do the inspection such as immune serologic microscopic agglutination, immunofluorescent antibody response and agar diffusing response and so on by using the corresponding bacterial antiserum and unknown strains, the result is that the appearance of idio-fluorescence response of the fluorescent antibody inspection among homogeneous bacterial; the appearance of the specific immune precipitation line in agar-diffusing inspection. This research indicated the feasibility of inspecting the inspected bacteria and became a beneficial supplement of traditional bacterial identity, providing a reliable method for diagnosing the disease quickly and accurately.
     Part Three: The ZB4 strain’s genic sequencing of 16SrRNA and analysis of the phyletic evolution of alopex’s aeruginosus bacillus
     The result of aetiological study indicated that aeruginosus bacillus is one of the major reasons which influenced the multiple infections of the large-scaled alopex farms, in order to investigate the characteristics of molecular biology further, the consensus primer of 16SrRNA genes of procaryote were used to clone the 16SrRNA genes of alopex’s pathogenic aeruginosus bacillus isolated and purified and analyze sequence. The DNAstar software was used to analyze the homology between the sequence acquired and the sequence had a high homology with the sequence selected and the MEGA(3.1) software was used to form analogs’cladogram. The result indicated that there’s a high homology, from 98.7% to 99.2%, between the bacterial strain and nine representative strains of Pseudomonas, through phylogenetic trees constructed, the ZB4 strain and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (AJ249451) had a nearest evolutionary distance and the homology was 99.2%.
引文
[1]蔡妙英.一种新的人兽共患传染病-狐阴道加德纳氏菌病的研究.Ⅱ.病原菌鉴定[J].微生物学报,1995,35(1):33
    [2]程世鹏,王克坚,阎新华.经济动物疾病诊疗新技术.沈阳.辽宁科学技术出版社,1997,123.
    [3]董德刚.乳酸杆菌制剂对非特异性阴道炎的治疗及机制的研究[J].中国微生态学杂志,1994,6(2):14-18.
    [4]东秀珠,蔡妙英.常见细菌系统鉴定手册[M].北京:科学出版社,2001,162- 170.
    [5]高玉伟,夏咸柱,胡桂学,等.细菌分离与基因扩增确诊水貂出血性肺炎[J].黑龙江畜牧兽医, 2006, 4: 53-54.
    [6]高玉兰.绿脓杆菌引起狐子宫炎的诊断[J].中国兽医科技,1995,25(12): 40.
    [7]高玉林.蓝狐巴氏杆菌病的诊治[J].甘肃畜牧兽医,2000,1:13.
    [8]顾党,王印双.狐狸大肠杆菌病诊疗报告[J].北方牧业,2006,4:16-17.
    [9]关中湘,王树志.毛皮动物疾病学.北京,农业出版社,1988,438.
    [10]胡海,周文林.狐狸钩端螺旋体病的诊治[J].中国兽医杂志2001,37(3): 55.
    [11]胡传伟,贾赟,简中友.水貂奇异变形杆菌的分离鉴定[J].经济动物学报, 2006, 2:2-3.
    [12]侯朝晖,杨景云,任力,等.中药安菌凝胶对狐阴道加德纳氏菌病的实验研究[J].中国微生物学杂志,2000,8(12):203-205.
    [13]姜英民,董清平,张守双.北极狐出血性胃肠炎的诊断与治疗[J].黑龙江畜牧兽医, 2000, 2: 53-54.
    [14]籍玉林,等.我国特种经济动物养殖业的历史回顾与发展趋势[J].经济动物学报,1997,1(2):59-62.
    [15]李玉梅,姚纪元.狐狸巴氏杆菌病病原的分离鉴定[J].中国兽药杂志2007,41(10):56-57.
    [16]李冰,王学刚.狐狸魏氏梭菌病的诊断报告[J].现代畜牧兽医,2006,7:60.
    [17]李雪松,李研,徐峰.如何防治狐阴道加德纳氏菌病.养殖技术顾问,2003. 8:39.
    [18]刘玉清.沙皮母犬常见繁殖障碍性疾病的诊治[J].辽宁畜牧兽医,2003,(1):19-20.
    [19]刘敏.几种与泌尿生殖道感染有关的细菌[M].国外医学临床生物化学与检验学分册,1999,20(2):15-17.
    [20]罗国良,田宏宇,张海玲,等.狐犬瘟热继发细菌感染的诊断及防治[J].经济动物学报,2007,2:121-122.
    [21]彭大新,张如宽,徐圻,等.山羊绿脓杆菌感染的诊断[J].中国兽医科技, 1997,27(2):37-38.
    [22]朴厚坤,李元刚,阎新华.科学养狐问答[M].北京:中国农业出版社, 2002,62.
    [23]戎映君,松坤,陈集双,等.一种蜜蜂细菌性幼虫病病原的分离鉴定[J].微生物学报,2006,46(6): 994 -998.
    [24]宋玉乔.狐狸链球菌病的诊治[J].河北畜牧兽医,2003,19(11):47.
    [25]王春璈.毛皮动物养殖与疾病防治[M].北京,科学普及出版社,2007,1-3.
    [26]王庆普,董兆斗.狐阴道加德纳氏菌病的调查[J].中国兽医杂志,1997, 23 (10):36-37.
    [27]王世鹏,侯九仑,刘敦员等.绿脓杆菌分群血清的研制[J].中华微生物学与免疫学杂志,1982,21:22-26.
    [28]王世鹏,侯九仑,刘敦员,等.1255株绿脓杆菌的血清学分群及菌群分布调查分析[J].中华微生物学和免疫学杂志,1987,7 2 :125-128.
    [29]吴龙华,包超一,顾永熙.长颈鹿绿脓杆菌感染的诊断和治疗[J].中国兽医杂志,2001,37(6):53.
    [30]武世珍,靖吉强.狐绿脓杆菌感染的诊治[J].河北畜牧兽医,2002,18(3): 39.
    [31]徐云超,周宏芳.一例狐细小病毒性肠炎与大肠杆菌病混合感染的诊治[J].养殖技术顾问,2007,7:18.
    [32]徐龙涛,范伟兴.狐阴道加德纳氏菌病及其防制.动物医学进展,2003, 35:8.
    [33]肖肖,任艳丽,郭玉璞,等.幼龄鸵鸟绿脓杆菌病的诊断[J].中国兽医科技,2000,30(2):34-35.
    [34]徐怀英,瑞良.铜绿假单胞菌致病作用及防治[J].黑龙江畜牧兽医,2000,1(1):6-17.
    [35]阎喜军.狐化脓性子宫内膜炎疫苗的研制及应用效果观察[J].中国预防兽医学报,000,21(3):200-02.
    [36]阎喜军,阎新华,赵传芳,等.狐阴道加德纳氏菌病疫苗应用效果研究[J].经济动物学报,999,3(2):1-3.
    [37]阎喜军.阴道加德纳氏菌病病原学及流行病学研究进展[J].中国人兽共患病杂志,1997,13(5):39-40.
    [38]阎新华.2001年狐病流行动态、病因及预防措施.特种经济动植物,2001,4:12.
    [39]阎新华,程世鹏.丹麦根除阿留申病的十年成效[J].国外特种经济动植物,1989,(4):14~15,25.
    [40]阎新华,赵传芳,王长风.妊娠北极狐流产菌的鉴定分离,1997,1(4):4~6.
    [41]阎新华,等.狐阴道加德纳氏菌病虎红平板凝集试验诊断方法的研究[J].特产研究,1995,1:1-5.
    [42]闫新华,等.狐阴道加德纳氏菌病防治技术的研究[J].经济动物学报,1997,1 (3) :5~10.
    [43]阎新华,赵传芳,王长风.北极狐化脓性子宫内膜炎病原分离鉴定[J].中国预防兽医学报,1999,21(3):96-97.
    [44]阎新华.Dot-Elisa检测狐阴道加德纳氏菌病血清抗体的研究[J].微生物学报,1995,35(4):287-291.
    [45]阎新华.狐病实用技术防治问答(3).特种经济动植物,200.3:41.
    [46]严忠诚,阎新华,赵传芳,等.狐阴道加德纳氏菌病的研究[J].中国农学通报,1995,2:37-38.
    [47]严忠诚,阎新华,赵传芳,等.一种新的人兽共患传染病-狐阴道加德纳氏菌病的研究.Ⅳ.阴道加德纳氏菌病疫苗的研制[J].微生物学报,1997,37 (3):217-227.
    [48]严忠诚,阎新华,赵传芳,等.一种新的人兽共患传染病-狐阴道加德纳氏菌病的研究.I.病原菌分离和人工感染试验[J].微生物学报,1995,35(1):28-32.
    [49]严忠诚,阎新华,赵传芳,等.一种新的人兽共患传染病-狐阴道加德纳氏菌病的研究.Ⅲ.流行病学调查[J].微生物学报,1995,35(3):209-215.
    [50]严忠诚,阎新华,赵传芳,等.狐阴道加德纳氏菌的病的研究简报[J].特产研究,1991,3:58.
    [51]严忠诚,阎新华,赵传芳,等.一种新的人兽共患传染病-狐阴道加[52]德纳氏菌病的研究.Ⅴ.狐阴道加德纳氏菌菌株的血清分型研究[J].微生物学报, 1996,36(5):373-378.
    [53]严忠诚,阎新华,赵传芳,等.一种新的人兽共患传染病-狐阴道加德纳氏菌病的研究.II.微生物学报,1995,35(3):209-215.
    [54]杨文博.微生物学实验[M].北京:化学工业出版社,2004.
    [55]尹燕博,徐瑞,李葳,等.绿脓杆菌引起狐狸流产的临床病原学和病理学诊断[J].中国动物检疫,1998,15 (30):10-11.
    [56]余星明,王成东,钟顺隆,等.小熊猫绿脓杆菌病的诊断[J].中国兽医科技,2000,30(8):36-37.
    [57]于柏峰,张惠云,刘冰,等.铜绿假单胞菌致病力和致病机理研究进展[J].微生物学杂志,2004,24 (1):52-53.
    [58]张振兴.经济动物疾病学[M].北京:中国农业出版社,1994,170-172.
    [59] Osborn F,Blinder R,Justin RE,et al.精编分子生物学实验指南[M].颜子颖,王海林译.第一版.北京:科学出版社,2001,39-40.
    [60] Sambrook J,Fritsch E F,Maniatis T.分子克隆实验指南[M].金冬雁,黎孟枫,等译.第二版.北京:科学出版社,1996.
    [61] Arancibia F, Bauer T T, Ewig S, Mensa J, NiedermanM S, TorresA.2002. Community acquired pneumonia due to gram2negative bacteria and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Arch Intern Med, 162: 1849 -1858.
    [62] Buchanan R E and Gibbs N E.Bergey’s Manaual of Determinative Bacteriology [M]. the 9th edition. Beijing: Science press,1997.
    [63] Bapat J A ,KulkarniV B,Nimje D V.Mortality inchicks due to Pseudomonas aeruginosa Indian J Anim Sci,1985,55(7):538-539.
    [64] Buck J D, Spotte S. 1985. Microbiology of captive white-beaked dolphins, Lagenothynchus albirostris, with commentson epizootics, Zoo Biol, 5: 321.
    [65] Carmeli Y, Troillet N, Karchmer A W, Samore M H. 1999. Health and economic outcomes of antibiotic resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Arch Intern Med, 159: 1127 - 1132.
    [66] Drancourt M,Bollet C,Carlioz R,et al. 16S ribosomal DNA sequence analysis of a large collection of environmental and clinical unidentifiable bacterial isolates [J].Clin Microbiol, 2000,38:3623-3630.
    [66] ElAmari E B, Chamot E, AuckenthalerR, Pechère J C, Delden C V.2001. Influence of previous exposure to antibiotic therapy on the susceptibility pattern of Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteremic isolates.Clin Infect Dis, 33: 1859 - 1864.
    [67] FineM J, Smith M A, Carson C A, Mutha S S, Sankey S S, Weissfeld L A, Kapoor W N. 1996. Prognosis and outcomes of patients with community acquired pneumonia: a meta-analysis. JAMA, 275:134 - 141.
    [68] HarrisA D, Perencevich E, Roghmann M C. 2002, Risk factorsforpip-eracillin- tazobactam-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa among hospitalized patients. Antim icrob Agents Chem other, 46: 854 - 858.
    [69] Hu H B,Xu Y Q,Cheng F,et al.Isolation and characterization of a new Pseudomonas strain produced both phenazine 1-carboxylic acid and pyoluteorin[J].Microbiol Biotech,2005,15:86-90.
    [70] Janda J M,Abbott S L. Bacterial identification for publication:when is enough enough[J ]?Clin Microbiol, 2002, 40:1887-1891.
    [71] Janem G, Jeffrey N W. 2001. Expression of Creactive protein in the human respiratory tract. Infection and Immunity, 69 (3) : 1747-1754.
    [72] Kumar RS,Ayyadurai N,Pandiaraja P,et al.Characterization of antifungal metabolite produced by a new strain Pseudomonas aeruginosa PUPa3 that exhibits broad- spectrum antifungal activity and biofertilizing traits [J]. Appl Microbiol,2005,98:145-154.
    [73] Lee S C, Fung C P, Liu P Y. 1999. Nosocomial infectionswith ceftazidime-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa: risk factors and outcome.Infect Control Hosp Epidem iol, 20: 205 - 207.
    [74] Liu R J, Wang D, Zhang X. 1999. The present population status conservation and rearing in captivity of the Yangtze finlessporpoise in China. IB I Report, 9: 33-39.
    [75] Liu R J, Wang K X, Zhao Q Z. 2002. Rearingof cetaceans in captivity in china. Acta Theriologica Sinica, 22( 2) : 130-135.(in Chinese)
    [76] MedwayW, Schryver H F. 1973. Respiratory problem in captive small cetaceans. J am VetMed Assoc, 163: 571.
    [77] Philippe E, WeissM, ShultzJM. 1999. Emergence of highly antibiotic-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa in relation to duration of empirical antipseudomonal antibiotic treatment. Clin Perform Qual Health Care, 7: 83-87.
    [78] Troillet N, Samore M H, Carmeli Y. 1997. Imipenem2resistant Pseudomonasaeruginosa: risk factors and antibiotic susceptibility patterns.Clin Infect Dis, 25: 1094-1098.
    [79] Vikramreddy M,Mohiuddin S M ,SeshagiriRao A.Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection in chicken Indian J Anim Sci,1986,56(2):221-223.
    [80] Wang D, Hao Y J, Wang K X, Zhao Q Z, Chen D Q, Wei Z, Zhang X F. 2005. The first Yangtze finless porpoise successfully born in captivity.Environ Sci and Pollut Res,5(12):247-250.
    [81] Wang H F, WangX J, Wu J X. 2005. Drug-sensitive testofpathogenic bacteria infected in lower respiratory tract. Prac J Med and Pharm, 22(2):119-120.(in Chinese)
    [82] Wei Z, Wang D. 2002. Population size, behavior, movement pattern and protection of Yangtze finless porpoise at balijiang section of the Yangtze River. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 11(5):427-432.
    [83] Yehuda C, Nicolas T, GeorgeM E, Matthew H S. 1999. Emergence of antibiotic-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa: comparison of risks associated with different antipseudomonal agents. Antim icrob Agents Chemother,43:1379-1382.
    [84] Zhang X F.1992. Study on the age determination, growth and reproduction of finless porpoise Neophocaena phocaenoides. Acta Hydrobiologica Sinica, 16(4):289-298.(in Chinese)
    [85] Zhang X F, Wang K X. 1999. Population viability analysis for the Yangtze finlessporpoise. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 19(4):529-533.