分级Ad Hoc网络的组网研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
移动Ad hoc网络(MANET)是一种不需要基础设施的多跳无线网络,它由多个无线节点组成,没有中心控制节点,是完全分布式的网络结构。网络节点可以随意移动,网络拓扑结构不断变化,组网灵活、方便、快速,有很强的抗毁性和抗干扰性,主要满足紧急、临时通信和军用移动通信的要求。Ad hoc网络按照节点间的组织关系可分为平面和分级两种结构:平面结构中节点之间为平等关系,网络健壮、安全性强,主要适用于中小型网络;分级结构的网络则由多个群组成,各群群首集中管理成员信息和提供群间路由,其良好的可扩展性非常适合大型网络。分级结构又可按照通信方式分为单频和多频分级两种。
     对于大型移动Ad hoc网络,需要高效的组网机制来实现控制开销少、可扩展性强的有机组织和运行。本论文通过对网络分级(分群)方式的选择、动态分群、IPv6地址自动配置、分级路由、移动性管理、群首数据库备份等问题的研究和分析,设计了一套以HOLSR(Hierarchical Optimum Link State Routing)路由协议为核心的多频分级Ad hoc网络优化组网方案。HOLSR协议是一种以平面OLSR为基础针对节点异构大型Ad hoc网络提出的分级路由协议,它充分考虑了异构网络的特点,在弥补了平面OLSR协议可扩展性不强这一缺陷的同时加入了分群和群成员信息交换机制。在HOLSR协议的基础上,本文的组网方案整合了动态分群和IPv6地址自动分配算法,设计了基于群成员信息交换的移动性管理算法,提出了群首数据库备份机制,目标是以尽量小的控制开销完成高效可靠、可扩展性和抗毁性强的多级网络自动组织及管理。
     仿真结果表明,该方案在大规模多频分级结构场景中能充分发挥网络中高性能节点的作用,提高组网过程的效率和性能,有效减小运行维护过程中的控制开销,保障了网络在移动过程中通信的快速、稳定和连续性,同时对网络的群移动方式提供了良好的支持。该方案为大型分级移动Ad hoc网络的组网实现提供了参考。
Mobile Ad hoc NETwork (MANET) is a wireless multi-hop network without pre-established infrastructure. There is no central controller and MANET is completed distributed. Because of its convenience, quickness and robust, MANET can be used for emergency, temporary communication and military requirement.
     According to the structure MANET can be sorted into two categories: flat and hierarchical. Flat structure is mostly used in small and medium scale networks, where the nodes are completely equal to each other and the robusty is ensured. Hierarchical structure consists of clusters and is used in large scale networks for its high scalability. There are two communication methods in hierarchical networks: using single-frequency or multi-frequency. The large scale MANET needs self-organizing and working properly and efficiently under a series of protocols including clustering, routing, IP address assignment and mobility management, in which the routing protocol plays a key part because it determines the logical structure and communication performance of the network. Based on flat OLSR protocol, HOLSR (Hierarchical Optimum Link State Routing) is designed aiming to provide clustering, multi-level routing and members’management in hierarchical MANET.
     This paper proposes a build-up scheme for large scale heterogeneous MANET where a hierarchical architecture with multi-frequency is preferred. Optimized and combined operations of clustering, IPv6 address auto-configuration, HOLSR routing protocol and mobility management are proposed to reduce the control overhead and improve the scalability of the networks. And a mechanism of database backing up of cluster heads is designed to boost up the network’s robustness. Simulation results demonstrate that the scheme improves the efficiency and performance of the organization of heterogeneous ad hoc networks and supports nodes’group mobility well.
引文
[1] T. S. Rappaport, Wireless Communications: Principle and Practice, Prentice Hall Publishing, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 1996
    [2] IETF. Mobile ad hoc networks charter [EB/OL]. http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/manet-charter.html, Sep. 2002
    [3]肖永康,山秀明,任勇.无线Ad Hoc网络及其研究难点.电信科学, 2002年第6期
    [4]王海涛,郑少仁,宋丽华.移动Ad hoc网络的体系结构和分簇算法.解放军理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2003年8月.第4卷第4期:7-11.
    [5]赵志峰,郑少仁. Ad hoc网络体系结构研究.电信科学, 2001,17(1):14-17
    [6]史美林,英春.自组网路由协议综述.通信学报, 2001,22:93-103 1 ZY [7] P. sinha, R. Sivakumar and V. Bharghavan. CEDAR: a core-extraction distributed ad hoc routing algorithm. Proc. of the IEEE INFOCOM’99, vol.1, pp. 21-25, Mar. 1999
    [8] M. JIANG, J. LI, Y. C. TAY. Cluster Based Routing Protocol (CBRP) Functional Speci_cation Internet Draft, draft-ietf-manet-cbrp.txt, work in progress, June 1999.
    [9] A. Rangaswamy, H. K. Pung.Enhancement of Passive Cluster Based Routing Protocol for Mobile Ad hoc Networks.2002
    [10] P. Yang, K. C. Yow, N. Sukumar. A Hierarchical Routing Protocol Providing Stability and Distribution for MANET. IEEE Communications Magazine, 15-18.2003.12
    [11] T. Su, W. Jeng, J. Huang, W.Hsieh. A Novel Hierarchical Ad Hoc Networks.IEEE Communications Magazine.2006
    [12] G. Pei, M. Gerla, X. Hong, C. C. Chiang. A wireless hierarchical routing protocol with group mobility. Proceedings of IEEE WCNC 99,New Orleans,LA,Sep1999
    [13] M. Gerla, X. Y. Hong, L. Ma, G. G. Pei. Landmark Routing Protocol (LANMAR) Internet Draft. draft-ietf-manet-lanmar-05.txt. work in progress, June 2002
    [14] K. Chandrashekar, R. Morera, A. McAuley, J. Baras.Domain Based Hierarchical Routing For Large Heterogeneous Manets. Military Communications Conference, 2005
    [15] M. Gerla, X.Y. Hong, K. X. Xu, Z. H. Lu, C. Flores. LANMAR + OLSR: A Scalable, GroupOriented Extension of OLSR. http://olsrinterop.free.fr/papers/UCLA-Lanmar+OLSR-paper.pdf, Sep. 2004
    [16] Y. Z. Lee, K. Xu, X. Y. Hon, M. Gerlal. Hybrid landmark routing in ad hoc networks with heterogeneous group mobility. IEEE Communications Magazine. 2005
    [17] L. Villasenor-Gonzalez, Y. Ge and L. Lamont. HOLSR: A Hierarchical Proactive Routing Mechanism for Mobile Ad Hoc Networks. IEEE Communications Magazine.July 2005
    [18] M. H. Jin, H. K. Wu and J. T. Horng. A Hierarchical Routing Protocol for Large Scale Ad Hoc Network. IEEE Communications Magazine.1999
    [19] Y. Lu, W. Wang and B. Bhargava. Hierarchical Structure for Supporting Movable Base Stations in Wireless Networks.IEEE Communications Magazine. 2003
    [20] K. Y. Lee, J. B. Hwang, J. D. Ryoo. End-to-End QoS Routing in Physically Hierarchical Wireless Ad-Hoc Networks. IEEE Communications Magazine. 2005
    [21] M. Gerla, G. Pei, X. Y. Hong, T. W. Chen. Fisheye State Routing Protocol (FSR) for Ad Hoc Networks Internet Draft, draft-ietf-manet-fsr-03.txt, June 2002.
    [22] Z. J. Haas, M. R. Pearlman, P. Samara. The Zone Routing Protocol (ZRP) Internet Draft, draft-ietf-manet-zone-zrp-04.txt, July 2002.
    [23] S. Chakrabarti, A. Mishra. QoS Issues in Ad Hoc Woreless Networks. IEEE Communication Magszine, Feb. 2001
    [24]张先迪,李正良.图论及其应用.高等教育出版社. 2005年2月第1版.
    [25] C. Perkins, P. Bhagwat. Highly dynamic destination-sequenced distance-vector routing (DSDV) for mobile computers. ACM SIGCOMM’94. London, Sep. 1994.
    [26] T. Clausen, P. Jacquet. The Optimized Link State Routing Protocol. RFC 3626, October 2003.
    [27] T. Clausen, C. Dearlove, P. Jacquet. The Optimized Link-State Routing Protocol version 2 (OLSRv2). work in progress draft-ietf-manet-olsrv2-02.txt, June 2006
    [28] R. Ogier, F. Templin, and M. Lewis. Topology dissemination based on reverse-path forwarding (TBRPF). IETF Draft, Oct. 2003.
    [29] L. Kleinrock and K. Stevens. Fisheye: A Lenslike Computer Display Transformation. Technical report, UCLA, Computer Science Department, 1971.
    [30] M. Mohsin and R. Prakash. IP Address Assignment In A Mobile Ad Hoc Network. Proceedingsof Military Communications Conference, Vol. 2, pp. 856-861, Anaheim, California, USA, October 2002
    [31] K. Weniger, M. Zitterbart, IPv6 autoconfiguration in large scale mobile ad-hoc networks. European Wireless 2002, Florence, Italy, February 2002
    [32] S. Thomson and T. Narten. IPv6 Stateless Address Autoconfiguration. RFC 2462, Dec. 1998.
    [33] T. Narten, E. Nordmark, W. Simpson. Neighbor Discovery for IP Version 6 (IPv6). RFC 2461.December 1998
    [34] R. Hinden, and S. Deering. Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Addressing Architecture. RFC 3513, April 2003.
    [35] Joseph Davies.理解IPv6,张晓彤等译.北京:清华大学出版社, 2004, 40-193
    [36] IEEE std 802.11-1997, Wireless medium access control(MAC) and physical layer(PHY) specifications, 1997.
    [37] T. Clausen, J. Dean, C. Dearlove, and C. Adjih. Generalized MANET Packet/Message Format. draft-ietf-manet-packetbb-02.txt. work in progress, January 2007.
    [38] T. Clausen, C. Dearlove, J. Dean. MANET Neighborhood Discovery Protocol (NHDP). work in progress draft-ietf-manet-nhdp-00, June, 2006
    [39] S. Cheshire and B. Aboba. Dynamic Configuration of IPv4 Link-Local Addresses. draft-ietf.zeroconf-ipv4-linklocal-03.txt (expires December22, 2001), Internet Engineering Task Force, Zeroconf Working Group, June 2001.
    [40] C.E. Perkins, J.T. Malinen, R. Wakikawa, E.M. Belding-Royer, and Y. Sun. IP Address Autoconfiguration for Ad Hoc Networks, draft-ietfmanet-autoconf-01.txt. Internet Engineering Task Force, MANET Working Group, July 2000.
    [41] H. Zhou, L. Ni, and M. Mutka. Prophet Address Allocation for Large Scale MANETs. Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM 2003, Mar. 2003.
    [42] S. Toner and D. O’Mahony. Self-Organising Node Address Management in Ad-hoc Networks. Networks & Telecommunications Research Group (NTRG) Trinity College, Dublin 2, Ireland,2003.
    [43] X. Hong, M. Gerla, G. Pei et al. A group mobility model for ad Hoc wireless networks. Proceedings of 2nd ACM International Workshop on Modeling, Analysis, and Simulation of Wireless and Mobile Systems(MSWiM’99) , Seattle,WA, 1999: 53~60
    [44]郑相全.无线自组网技术实用教程.北京:清华大学出版社,2004.p247~254
    [45] G. Pei, M. Gerla. Mobility management in hierachical multi-hop mobile wireless networks. Computer Communications and Networks, 1999. Proceedings. Eight International Conference on, 1999 pp.324~329
    [46] Z. J. Haas, B. Liang. Ad hoc Mobility Management With Uniform Quorum Systems. http://citeseer.nj.nec.com/231365.html
    [47] Malkasian, Carter. Charting the Pathway to OMFTS: A Historical Assessment of Amphibious Operations from 1941 to the Present. CNA Corporation. CRM D0006297.A2. July 2002.