基于双边市场理论的软件平台运营机制研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
随着网络经济的发展,在软件业和互联网业的共同推动之下,软件平台从“桌面”系统向互联网平台迁移,同时软件交易也日益电子商务化。这种转变一方面重塑了软件产业的商业模式,为产业发展注入了新的活力,使软件平台产业迎来了蓬勃发展之势;另一方面也使软件平台逐步成为软件生态系统的核心,未来随着云计算模式的成熟,软件平台将迎来更加广阔的发展空间。但目前理论界还缺乏对软件平台运营机制全面、系统的研究,诸多的理论和实践问题未能得到有效解释,滞后于产业实践的发展。本文立足软件平台的产业发展前沿,深入分析软件平台的属性特征,并以其特有属性为主线,研究了软件平台在不同特征结构下的行为和绩效问题,将具有重要的理论和现实意义。
     同时本文在研究方法、研究对象及研究内容方面,也均具有一定的突破和创新:
     在研究方法上,本文借鉴了传统产业组织理论的对软件产业的研究成果,并综合运用了博弈论的分析方法。突破了现有文献大多在单一理论框架下研究软件平台运营模式的问题,有较强的方法创新性;
     在研究对象上,本文立足产业发展实践将软件平台的内涵拓展到基于互联网的新型软件平台上,对目前大多数文献中软件平台的研究均以PC操作系统作为主要对象进行了补充。同时也挖掘了在这样的形势下软件平台新的属性特征,如多层次开放性、双边用户多归属性等。因此在研究对象上具有一定的创新性。
     在研究内容上,本文从软件平台的特有属性出发,研究了“三角式”体系架构下的软件平台定价机制、封闭和开放结构对软件平台运营的影响、双边用户多归属条件下的平台运营特点等产业热点问题。而目前还鲜见以上这些领域的理论研究成果,体现了本文在内容上的创新性。
     本文的主要研究思路和组织采用了“总-分-总”的结构:首先,梳理软件平台的发展脉络,把握软件平台在产业发展中所面临的主要问题;其次,回顾前人学者在软件平台运营方面的研究,并与实践相结合,总结现有研究的不足;并综述双边市场理论研究与应用的发展现状,一方面论证应用双边市场理论来研究软件平台运营问题的合理性,另一方面也为本文的后续研究提供理论支撑;第三,在双边市场的视角下,根据前文对软件平台运营实践和理论发展的认识,分析软件平台的结构特征,这是后续建立分析模型的基础;第四,在软件平台的不同属性特征下,分别建立数理分析模型,研究不同情况下软件平台的运营特点;最后,总结前文对软件平台运营规律的研究,并对平台企业的发展提出建议。论文整体上完成了从实践到理论再到实践的“归纳——演绎”过程
     通过研究,本文得到如下主要结论:
     第一.软件平台既具有双边市场的一般特征,又具有一定的特有属性。在一般特征方面,主要包括:双边用户之间具有交叉网络外部性,价格结构非中性和双边需求的互补性的特点。在特有属性方面,主要包括:“三角式”的体系架构,具有封闭或开放的多层次开放性,及双边用户的同时多归属。这些特点共同决定了软件平台的运营机制问题。
     第二,用户单归属的市场垄断环境下。软件平台的利润与接入的双边用户规模,效用弹性和平台的结构等均相关。而在其他因素不变的情况下,开放一体化结构的软件平台将在最终用户接入规模方面占优。封闭一体化结构的软件平台在利润水平方面占优。
     第三,单归属的市场竞争环境下。用户的最大需求量及竞争平台之间的可替代程度,共同决定了平台是否能在市场份额和利润方面占据优势。
     同时分析发现,为在市场竞争中占据优势地位,封闭平台和开放一体化平台应采取不同的竞争策略。封闭平台需要在用户侧进行持续的创新,提高用户最大需求量;而开放平台在用户侧只需采取跟随策略即可,需要提高对应用软件的纵向整合能力。
     第四,在双边多归属条件下软件平台的运营研究中发现,当软件平台在一边拥有越多的单归属用户时,将对另一边用户制定更高的接入价格,但依然能够在另一边吸引较多的用户接入。这一结论体现出单归属用户对软件平台的特殊重要性。
     最后结合主要结论,论文对软件平台企业在平台的结构、市场行为、总体发展战略上提供了相关建议。
With the development of the network economy, the software platform market, promoted by the software industry and the Internet industry, is growing rapidly. On the one hand, through E-commerce of software transaction, software platform reshapes the business model of the software industry, and injected new vitality to industry development. On the other hand, introducting the third-party applications to Internet open platform, which open up a new territory for the development of the Internet industry. Especially, in the future, with the mature and popularity of clound computing, software platform will face to a broader space.And the software platform is gradually becoming the core of the software ecosystem.But currently, the research on operationg mechanism of software platform is not comprehensive and systematic enough.
     So this paper focus on the platform's structure, conduction and performance, from the characteristics of the software platform
     This paper, which researched platform in the behavior and performance of different structures, will have important theoretical and practical significance.
     In research method, object and content, this paper also has certain breakthroughs and innovations:
     First of all, in terms of the research method, the existing research had two perspectives:the traditional economics and two-sided market theory. They both had some shortcoming. This paper mainly study from the theoretical framework of two-sided market, but in the modeling and analyzing, combine with the traditional economics research in the software industry, and use of game theory research methods. So it will break through the original ideas in the framework of a single theory.
     Secondly, in terms of the research object.In the past, PC operating system was mostly as object of the software platform. But because software platform is migrating to the Internet, it has new characteristics of the industry.So this paper expands the connotation of a software platform.
     At last, in terms of the research content, this paper focus on "software platform pricing mechanism under triangle architecture","different operating characteristics about closed and open software platform",'platform operating under two-sided multi-homing conditions" These are hot issues about software platform industry,but now lack of related research in these areas, so it will also reflect the innovation on research.
     The main conclusions of this research are as follows:
     Firstly, the software platform has the general characteristics of the two-sided markets, such as:cross-group externalities, non-neutral conditions of the price structure, and complimentary to two-side users.But also it has the specific characteristics, such as:triangle architecture, a variety of structures,multi-homing of two-sided users.
     These features together determine the operation mechanism of the software platform.
     Secondly, about monopoly platform, the scale of profits and end-suers depends on elasticity of demand and structure of platform.
     In general, vertically integrated open platform will dominate in terms of end-users'share. But vertically integrated closed platform will dominate in terms of profits.
     Thirdly, about two-sided single-homing competitive platform, whether it dominates on end-users scale, will depand on the maximum demand of the platform and substitutability between platforms.
     In general, competing between closed platform and integrated open platform, conditions of dominant on profits will be lower than conditions of dominant on profits user scale.
     Forthly, about two-sided multi-homing competitive platform,when the software platform has more single-homing users, will make the platform price higher to the other side, and still be able to attract more users of the other side to access. It reflects that the important significance of single-homing users to the software platform.
     Finally, combining with conclusions, the paper provided related recommendations on choicing of platform's structure, drawing up market and development strategies.
引文
[1]. Alfred Taudes, Markus Feurstein, Andreas Mild. Options Analysis of Software Platform Decisions:A Case Study [J].MIS Quarterly.2000,(24)2:27-243.
    [2].李泉.双边市场价格理论及其产业应用研究[D].上海交通大学.2008.
    [3].计世资讯.中国软件平台产业战略发展研究[R].2003.
    [4].杨芙清,梅宏,吕建,金芝.浅论软件技术发展[J].电子学报.2002,30(12A):1901-1906.
    [5].互联网实验室.中国软件产业发展战略报告[R].2006.
    [6].中科院研究生院管理学院.中国互联网平台开放性调查报告[R].2011.
    [7].徐晋.平台经济:平台竞争的理论与实践[M].上海:上海交通大学出版社.2007.
    [8].艾瑞咨询集团(iResearch).移动应用商店监测报告[R].2012.
    [9].王万山.软件产品价格机制研究[D].江西财经大学.2003.
    [10].唐任仲.工程应用软件开发技术[M].北京:化学工业出版社.1999.
    [11]. Johansson,E. The importance of quality requirements in software platform development-a survey[C]. Proceedings of the 34th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.2001.
    [12]. Yann Renard, Fabien Lotte. Open ViBE:An Open-Source Software Platform to Design,Test, and Use Brain-Computer Interfaces in Real and Virtual Environments[J].Presence.2010,19(1):35-53.
    [13].李春青.软件平台:中间件增值新领域[J].软件世界.2003,(12):97-98.
    [14]. Christopher Koch.A New Blueprint For The Enterprise [J]. CIO Magazine. 2005.5.
    [15]. David Sprott, Lawrence Wilkes.Understanding Service-Oriented Architecture [EB/OL].Available at:http://msdn.microsoft. com/en-us/library/aa480021.aspx.
    [16]. Bic, Lubomir.Opertating Systemt Principles=操作系统原理[M].北京:清华大学出版社.2004.
    [17]. Vnia,Pieter. Adding value to the network:Mobile operators'experiments with Software-as-a-Service and Platform-as-a-Service models [J]. Telematics and Informatics.2011,28(1):12-21.
    [18]. Armbrust, M., Fox, A., Griffith, R. et al. Above the Clouds:A Berkeley View of Cloud Computing [C].Communications of the ACM.2010,53(4):50-58.
    [19]. Jansen S., Finkelstein A., Brinkkemper S.. A sense of community:A research agenda for software ecosystems[C]. In:31st International Conference on Software Engineering-Companion Volume.2009:187-190.
    [20]. Martti Viljainen, Marjo Kauppinen. Software Ecosystems:A Set of Management Practices for Platform Integrators in the Telecom Industry[C]. The Second International Conference, ICSOB.2011:32-43.
    [21]. Konstantinos Manikas, Klaus Marius Hansen. Software ecosystems-A systematic literature review[J]. The Journal of Systems and Software.2012,86(5):1294-1306.
    [22]. Rahul C. Basole, Dr. Jurgen Karla.On the Evolution of Mobile Platform Ecosystem Structure and Strategy [J]. Business & Information Systems Engineering.2011,3(5):313-322.
    [23].程贵孙.双边市场视角下的平台企业行为研究[J].经济理论与经济管理.2006.(9):55-60.
    [24]. Roehet,J.J.Tirole.Platform Competition in Two-Sided Markets. Journal of European Economic Association.2003,1(4):990-1029.
    [25].张启迪.基于平台经济理论的运营商企业平台应用研究[D].北京邮电大学.2012.
    [26].方万山.软件平台价格机制研究[D].江西财经大学.2003.
    [27].董志辉.基于双边市场理论的社交网络研究[D].厦门大学.2009.
    [28].张良卫.基于双边市场理论的即时通讯行业网络外部性研究—以腾讯公司为例[D].上海交通大学.2009.
    [29].王冠桥.基于双边市场的视频游戏平台市场结构选择研究[D].上海交通大学.2001.
    [30].罗钢,黄丽华.网络外部性条件下的电子商务平台双边定价策略[J].电子商务.2007,(4):135-137.
    [31].C.夏皮罗,H.瓦里安.信息规则[M].中国人民大学出版社.2000.
    [32]. Virpi,Tuure,Jouni. Mobile Service Platforms——Comparing Nokia OVI and Apple App Store with the IISIn Model[C].2011 10th International Conference on Mobile Business.2011.
    [33]. Martin Kenney Bryan Pon. Structuring the Smartphone Industry:Is the Mobile Internet OS Platform the Key? [J] Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade.2011,11(3):239-261.
    [34]. Avi Silberschatz & Peter Galvin. Operation System Concept=操作系统概念[M].北京:高等教育出版社.2002.
    [35].陆钢,杨新章,李丽,李蓉蓉.业务能力开放标杆分析及趋势探讨[J].电信科 学.2011,27(4):12-15.
    [36]. Wright,J.The Determinants of Optimal Interchange Fees in Payment Systems[J].Journal of lndustial Economics,2004,52(1):1-26.
    [37]. Roson. Two-Sided Markets.Mimeo.Department of Sciense Economic, University Ca'Focari diVenezia.2004.
    [38]. Markus Reisinger. Three Essays on Oligopoly:Product Bundling, Two-Sided Markets and Vertical Product Differentiation [D].Department of Economics, University of Munich.2004.
    [39]. Armstrong,M. and J.Wright. Two-Sided Markets, Competitive Bottlenecks and Exclusive Contracts. Mimeo. University London College and National University of Singapore.2004.
    [40].尚秀芬,陈宏民.双边市场特征的企业竞争策略与规制研究综述[J].产业经济研究.2009,41(4):89-94.
    [41]. Michael L.Katz and Carl Shapiro.Network externalities, competition, andcompatibility. American Economic Review [J].1985,75(3):424-440.
    [42]. Rochet,J.,and J.Tirole. Platform Competition in Two-Sided Markets [J].Journal of European Economic Association.2003,1(4):990-1029.
    [43]. Gabszewicz,J.J. and X.Y Wauthy. Two-Sided Markets and Price Competition with Multi-homing.Mimeo,CORE.Louvain-la-Neuve University.2004.Available at:http://ssrn.Com/abstract=975897 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.975897
    [44]. Armstrong, M. Competition in two-sided markets[J].RAND Journal of Economics.2006,37(3):668-691.
    [45].罗亮.网络融合趋势下电信业市场结构商业模式与公共政策的经济分析[D].东南大学,2005,10.
    [46]. Rochet,J. and J.Tirole.Defining Two-Sided Markets.Mimeo.IDEI University of Toulouse.2004.
    [47]. Pierre Regibeau.A Comment on Evans, Hagiu and Schmalensee[J].CESifo Economic Studies.2005,51(2-3):225-232.
    [48]. Jean-Charles Rochet, Jean Tirole. Two-sided markets:a progress report [J].The RAND Journal of Economics.2006,37(3):645-667.
    [49]. Jean Charles Rochet and Jean Tirole.Platform Competition in Two-sided Markets.Mimeo.2001:1-45.
    [50]. Michel Holland.Two-Sided Markets:A Challenge to Competition Policy[C].Paper for The First Annual Competition Commission,Competition Tribunal and Mandela Institute Conference on Competition Law,Economics and Policy in South Africa,University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg.2007:1-24.
    [51]. Andrea Galeotti, Jose Luis.Platform intermediation in a market for differentiated products [J].European Economic Review.2009,53(4):417-428.
    [52].熊艳.产业组织的双边市场理论——一个文献综述[J].中南财经政法大学学报.2010,(4):49-56.
    [53].黄民礼.双边市场平台企业的策略及相关反垄断问题研究[D].东北财经大学.2007,11.
    [54].程贵孙,陈宏民,孙武军.双边市场视角下的平台企业行为研究[J].经济理论与经济管理.2006,(9):55-60.
    [55]. Evans,D. The Antitrust Economics of Multi-Sided Platform Markets[J].Yale Journal on Regulation.2003,20:325-82.
    [56]. Wright,J.The Determinants of Optimal Interchange Fees in Payment Systems[J] Journal of Industdal Economics.2004,52(1):1-26.
    [57].纪汉霖.双边市场定价策略研究[D].复旦大学.2006,10.
    [58].张娇妮.C2C购物网站的定价策略分析[D].辽宁大学.2010,5.
    [59].胥莉,陈宏民.基于不同市场结构的银行卡组织绩效研究[J].管理工程学报.2007,(21)3:35-39
    [60]. Armstrong, M. Competition in two-sided markets[J].RAND Journal of Economics.2006,37(3):668-691.
    [61]. Caillaud and Jullien. Chicken & Egg:Competition among Intermediation Service Providers [J].RAND Journal of Economics.2003,34(2):309-328.
    [62]. Roson.Two-sided Markets:A Tentative Survey [J].Review of Network Economic.2007,2(4):142-160.
    [63]. Nocke,Peitz Martin,Stahl Konrad. Platform Ownership [J].Journal of the European Economic Association.2007,5(6):1130-1160.
    [64].曹俊浩.基于双边市场理论的B2B平台运行策略及其演化研究[D].上海交通大学.2010,3.
    [65]. Hagiu A. Merchant or Two-Sided Platform [J]. Review of Network Economics. 2007,(6) 2:115-133.
    [66]. Economides N and Salop S C. Competition and integration among complements and network market structure [J]Journal of Industrial Economics.1992,40 (1): 105-123.
    [67]. Rochet C,Tirole J.Platform competition in two-sided markets[J]. Journal of the European Economic Association.2003,1(4):990-1209.
    [68].纪汉霖,管锡展.双边市场及其定价策略研究[J].外国经济与管理.2006,28(3):15-23
    [69].程贵孙.组内网络外部性对双边市场定价的影响分析[J].管理科学.2010,23(1):107-113.
    [70]. Farrell.J.&Katz.ML. Innovation, rent extraction,and integration in systems markets[J] Journal of Industrial Economics.2000,48(4):413-432.
    [71]. Economides N and Katsamakas E. Two-sided competition of proprietary vs open source technology platforms and the implications for the software industry [J].Management Science.2006,(52)7:1057-1071.
    [72].纪汉霖,管锡展.纵向一体化结构下的双边市场定价策略[J].系统工程理论与实践.2008,28(9):52-58.
    [73].李新义,王浩翰.双边市场横向兼并的定价及福利研究——以中国网络传媒业为例[J].财经研究.2010,36(1):27-33.
    [74].张新香,胡立君.数据业务时代我国移动通信产业链整合模式及绩效研究——基于双边市场的分析视角[J].中国工业经济.2010,(6):147-158.
    [75]. Hagiu.A.Optimal Pricing and Commitment in Two-Sided Markets[J]. Rand Journal of Economics.2004.
    [76]. Hagiu A.Two-sided platforms:pricing and social efficiency [EB/OL].Available at:http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=621461.2005.
    [77].纪汉霖,管锡展.服务质量差异化条件下的双边市场定价策略研究[J].产业经济研究.2007,(1):11-19.
    [78]. Mats A.Bergman.A Welfare Ranking of Two-sided Market Regimes[Z].Svefiges Riksbank Working Paper Series No.185,2005.
    [79].宋佳佳,武邦涛.平台竞争环境下软件产业的纵向一体化选择[J].科技管理研究.2010,(2):110-113.
    [80].李泉,陈宏民.基于双边市场框架的软件产业效率与福利分析[J].系统管理学报.2008,17(4):361-366.
    [81].郭丽丹.双边市场平台企业的策略及相关反垄断问题研究[D].东北财经大学.2007,11.
    [82]. Christos Kotsogiannis. Public Goods and Tax Competition in A Two-sided Market[J]. Journal of Public Economic Theory.2010,12(2):281-321.
    [83]. Patrik K.A two-sided market approach to value chain dynamics in telecom services[C].2010 Ninth International Conference on Mobile Business/2010 Ninth Global Mobility Roundtable.2010.
    [84].岳中刚.展览产品定价模型及价格影响因素研究——基于双边市场理论视角[J].经济管理.2007,29(16):26-31.
    [85].罗凡.号码百事通业务平台价值研究及运营建议[D].北京邮电大学.2008.
    [86].胥莉,王斌,陈丽.广告支持型双边市场的网络效应——即时通讯市场的实证分析[J].系统管理学报.2008,17(6):615-621.
    [87]. Gawer, A., M. A. Cusumano. Platform Leadership [J]. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.2002.
    [88].卢强.双边平台形成机制初探-以ICT行业为例[J].技术经济.2007,26(12):37-44
    [89]. Evans,Hagiu, Schmalensee. A Survey of the Economic Role of Software Platforms in computer based Industries[J].CESifo Economic Studies.2005, (2)51:189-224.
    [90].李晓宾.中国移动应用商店商业模式评价研究[D].北京邮电大学.2012.
    [91].孙怡.基于双边市场理论的移动互联网应用平台研究[D].北京邮电大学.2011.
    [92].张爱清,王建会,李宁.应用商店模式及发展趋势分析[J].软件产业与工程.2005,13(2):29-31.
    [93].王小利,李明建.运营商主导的移动应用商店及其商业模式优化[J].科技管理研究.2012,32(5):132-135,140.
    [94].陈宏民,胥莉.双边市场:企业竞争环境的新视角[M].上海:上海人民出版社,2007.
    [95].中关村在线咨询.苹果CEO库克:全球iOS设备总数已达5亿.Availablt at: http://soft.zol.com.cn/350/3508517.html.2013.
    [96].黄民礼.双边市场与市场形态的演进[J].首都经贸大学学报.2007,9(3):43-51.
    [97]. Bakos,J.Y. Towards Friction-Free Markets:The Emerging Role of Electronic Marketplaces on the Internet[J].Communications of the ACM.1998,41(8):35-42.
    [98]. Hagiu, A. Platforms, Pricing, Commitment and Variety in Two-Sided Markets [D]. Princeton University Doctoral Dissertation.2004.
    [99].百度百科.开放平台的定义[Z]Available at:http://baike.baidu.com/view/4039 572.htm.2013.
    [100].张志杰.智能手机操作系统的竞争与发展[D].北京邮电大学博士论文.2012.
    [101].纪汉霖.用户部分多归属条件下的双边市场定价策略[J].决策科学理论与方法.2010:262-271.
    [102]. Barry W.Boehm软件工程经济学:= Software engineering economics [M].北京:机械工业出版社.2004.
    [103].朱彤.网络效应经济理论——ICT产业的市场结构、企业行为与公共政策[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社.2004.
    [104]. Gandal,N. Hedonic Price Indexes for Spreadsheets and an Empirical Test of the Network Externalities Hypothesis[J].RAND Journal of Economics.1994, 5(1):160-170.
    [105]. Gandal,N. Competiong Compatibility Standards and Network Externalities in the PC Software Market.Review of Economics and Statistics.1995,77(4):599-608.
    [106]. Brynjolfsson,E.,Kemerer,C.Network Externalities in Microcomputer Software:An Econometric Analysis of the Spreadsheet Market[J].Management Science.l996,42(12):1627-1647.
    [107]. Shy O, Thisse. A Strategic Approach to Software Protection [J].Journal of Economics & Management Strategy.1999,8(2):163-190.
    [108]. Church J.,N.Gandal and D.Krause. Indirect Network Effects and Adoption Externalities. Working Papers.IDEAS,2002.
    [109].帅旭,陈宏民.基于硬件/软件范式的间接网络外部效应研究[J].系统工程理论与实践.2004,(2):25-30.
    [110]. Hagiu,A..Two-sided platforms:Product Variety and Pricing structure [J]. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy.2009,(18):1011-1043.
    [111].李泉,陈宏民.基于双边市场框架的软件产业若干问题研究[J].经济学(季刊).2009,8(3):951-968.
    [112].刘启,李明志.非对称条件下双边市场的定价模式[J].清华大学学报.2009,49(6):901-908.
    [113].张维迎著.博弈论与信息经济性[M].上海:上海人民出版社.1996.
    [114]. Poolsombat and Vernasca. Partial Multihoming in Two-sided Markets. Discussion paper of the University of York.2006.
    [115].姚乐泉.平行多重注册的双边市场定价研究[J].经济师.2008,(3):51-53.
    [116].胥莉,王斌,陈丽.广告支持型双边市场的网络效应——即时通信市场的实证分析[J].系统管理学报.2008,17(6):615-621.
    [117].景士颖.移动应用商店广告模式探讨[J].移动通信.2011,35(5):77-81.
    [118].广告技术流.移动广告商Millennial Media的研究报告[EB/OL].Available at: http://www.adexchanger.cn/tech-company/mobile/4230.html.2013.
    [119]. Kaiser U. and Wright J.Price Structure in two-sided markets:Evidence from the magazine industry [J]. International Journal of Industrial Organization.2006, (24)1:1-28.
    [120], Dukes A. The advertising market in a product oligopoly [J]. Journal of Industrial Economics.2004,52(3):327-348.
    [121]. Barros P. Media Competition on the Internet. Discussion Paper.2004.
    [122].胡雯瑾.广告支持型双边市场的价格结构与网络外部性研究[D].上海交通大学.2007.
    [123].朱振中,吕廷杰.具有负的双边网络外部性的媒体市场竞争研究[J].管理科学学报.2007,10(6):13-23.
    [124].程贵孙,陈宏民,孙武军.双边市场下电视传媒平台兼并的福利效应分析[J].管理科学学报.2009,12(2):9-18.
    [125].程贵孙.具有负网络外部性的媒体平台竞争与福利研究[J].管理科学学报.2010,13(10):89-96.
    [126].孙晓坤,聂普炎.搜索引擎企业的运营策略新视角[J].价格月刊.2010,(10):31-34.
    [127].李琛.基于双边市场理论的互联网企业基础平台加增值服务商业模式研究[D].中国社会科学院研究生院硕士论文.2011.
    [128]. Carmen Matutes, Pierre Regibeau."Mix and match":product compatibility without network externalities [J]. The RAND Journal of Economics.1988,19(2): 221-234.
    [129]. Jeffery Church, Neil Gandal. The dynamics of technological adoption in hardware/software systems:The case of compact disc players. The RAND Journal of Economics.2000,31(1):43-61.
    [130]. Ashish Aroraw, Farasat A.S.Bokhariz. Open Versus Closed Firms and the Dynamics of Industry Evolution [J]. The Journal of Industrial Economics.2007,3: 449-527.
    [131]. Carmen Matutes, Pierre Regibeau. Compatibility and Bundling of Complementary Goods in a Duopoly [J].Journal of Industrial Economics.1992,XL(1): 37-54.
    [132]. Michael Kende. Profitability under an Open versus a Closed System [J]. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy.1998,17(2):307-326.
    [133]. Joseph Farrell,Michael L.Katz. Innovation, rent extraction, and integration in systems markets [J]. The Journal of Industrial Economics.2000,48(4):413-432.
    [134]. Roberto Roson. Platform Competition with Endogenous Multi-homing. FEEM Working Paper.2005.
    [135]. Robort Roson.Two-sided markets:A tentative survey[J]. Review of Network Economics.2005,4(2):142-160.
    [136].范多毅.互联网网站整体迁移到云计算平台的研究与应用[J].微型电脑应用.2012,28(8):18-21.
    [137].史佩昌,王怀民,蒋杰,卢凯.面向云计算的网络化平台研究与实现[J].计算机工程与科学.2009,31(A1):249-252.
    [138].葛声,马殿富,胡春明,杜宗霞.基于Web服务的网络软件运行平台研究与实现[J].北京航空航天大学学报.2003,29(10):897-901.
    [139]. Poolsombat and Vernasca. Partial Multihoming in Two-sided Markets. Discussion paper of the University of York.2006.
    [140].姚乐泉.平行多重注册的双边市场定价研究[J].经济师.2008,(3):51-53.