温州、关中两地创业倾向比较
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
改革开放20多年,这一期间,我国各地呈现出较大的经济发展不平衡现象。从
    各个层面寻找地区发展不平衡的根本原因,成为很多学者研究的主题。诸多研究者发
    现创业活动的活跃程度是经济发展的重要贡献因素。然而,深究创业活动中人们表现
    出来的多样化的创业行为与创业心理,不管从社会学层面、经济学层面还是从管理学
    层面研究这一问题,都发现文化是其中的重要动因。
    文化驱动创业,创业提升经济是学术界比较认同的研究路径。文化的多样化引
    起创业活动多样化。中国是一个区域跨度很大的国家,很多研究都表明,区域文化明
    显存在差异。如何结合不同地区的文化基础,考虑当地的经济发展、创业模式与管理
    手段,正是跨区域管理、跨区域创业要解决的焦点问题,也是区域发展政策成功的深
    层次背景问题。因此,如何从文化视角解释不同地区创业活动的差异,揭示创业行为
    与心理背后的文化差异基础及其影响机制正是本文研究的目的所在。
    我国目前在创业研究方面,尤其是从文化视角研究创业问题仍不充分,而不同
    地区的实际创业活动又对解决此问题提出要求。基于研究的不足和实践的需要,本文
    以开放社会/封闭社会理论作为区域界定理论基础选择代表性区域,即选择东西部两
    个地区,浙江省温州地区和陕西省关中地区为代表性研究区域,试图从文化差异的角
    度,研究两地创业倾向的差异,揭示两地的创业倾向强点及其文化基础。
    在文化与创业倾向的构成面方面,以“与工作相关的潜在基本假设”(Schein,
    1992) 为文化构成面选择的基本标准,继承前人在文化维度、创业倾向维度方面的研
    究,从众多的文化线索和创业倾向线索中选择有效的文化维度构成体系与创业倾向维
    度构成体系,规划从文化距离视角分析温州、关中两地创业倾向差异的研究内容。具
    体而言,本文的研究内容主要集中于以下几个方面:
    (1) 温州地区与关中地区文化比较研究
    通过对文化分维度研究的相关文献回顾,以Hofstede(1980a)、Trompenaars
    (1993) 等人的文化维度框架为基础,选择权力距离、不确定性规避、集体主义/个
    体主义、男性化/女性化和业绩导向/因袭导向等五个维度构成本文文化研究维度,在
    文化维度选择的基础上对两个地区的文化进行了测量与比较研究。
    经调查数据测量与假设验证,表明温州地区在集体主义、不确定性规避、和因
    袭导向三个文化维度显著强于关中地区,与此相对应,关中地区在个人主义、风险导
    向、业绩导向方面强于温州地区。而在与之相关联的文化传统表现方面,温州地区比
    关中地区具有更强的家族取向和重商传统,这一文化传统表现与文化维度比较研究的
    结果是相吻合的。
    本文在此基础上,结合开放社会/封闭社会文化特征的回顾,推测判断温州属于
    
    一一一一一一—一一.一一一理些述创型途鱼鲤匕一一一~
     相对封闭社会,而关中则属于相对开放社会。
     (2)文化与创业倾向关系研究
     这部分研究在通过对创业理论的概括与回顾,本文在众多的创业者个性特质中
    选择创新性、内部控制点、先行性和勤奋积极性为创业倾向维度构成,采用Muller&
    Thomas(2000)的两因素组合创业倾向,提出四因素组合创业倾向,即创业倾向是
    创新性、内部控制点、先行性和勤奋积极性四个维度的交集。在此基础上,根据各文
    化维度的含义和各创业倾向维度含义之间的关系提出了文化与创业倾向关系的假设,
    并采用多元回归方法进行了经验验证。
     结果表明,男性化和权力距离的弱化对提高两地创业倾向有显著影响,是影响
    创业倾向的关键文化变量;集体主义对创业倾向构成维度中勤奋积极性有显著的正向
    影响,业绩导向对创新性和先行中有显著的正向影响关系,而不确定性规避仅对内部
    控制点有显著负向影响,是文化维度中对创业倾向影响较弱的一个维度。
     (3)文化视角的温州地区与关中地区创业倾向比较研究
     以温州与关中地区文化比较和文化与创业倾向具体关系为基础,保持地区文化
    比较结果、文化与创业倾向关系的结果两者逻辑的一致性,提出温州、关中两地创业
    倾向的差异假设,并以此假设为基础,对两个地区的创业倾向及其构成维度进行测量
    与比较研究。
     结果表明,温州地区仅在勤奋积极性上显著强于关中地区,而在创新性和内部
    控制点等方面都弱于关中地区,因此温州地区在两因素组合的创业倾向上显著弱于关
    中地区,这在一定程度上说明,关中地区的人们在创业方面具有更大的潜力,但是两
    个地区在四因素组合的创业倾向上并无显著差异,说明两地在创业方面又各有自身的
    强点与弱点。
     本文进一步从温州、关中两地的文化基础及其创业倾向差异推测到一般性的结
    论,即开放社会可能更会滋长内源性创业倾向,而封闭社会则更有可能滋生外压式的
    创业倾向。
     从以上几个部分研究及其结果中可以看到,本文坚持以量化测量验证为主要研
    究方法,取得了较丰富的成果,较好地贯彻了比较逻辑与关系逻辑相统一,创业倾向
    比较与文化基础相结合。与以往的研究相比,本文的创新与发现主要体现在以一下几个
    方面:
     (l)揭示了温州地区与关中地区文化差异
     通过经验数据的地区比较分析,温州地区与关中地区在
The regional economies have been turning more unbalanced during the decades of opening policy in China. It is one of the important issues to find the reasons accounting for the unbalanced regional economies. Many researchers have found that the extent of entrepreneurial activities is the important factor accounting for the economic development. However, further studies on the diversity of entrepreneurial behavior and mind have revealed that the ultimate reason always turns out to be the cultural difference among the regions whether a researcher deals with such an issue from the view of sociology, economics or management.Many people of the academic circle agree that it is a logic path that culture drives entrepreneurial activities and entrepreneurial activities further promote the economy. However, the culture is not homogeneous around China. Many researches have found that there exist regional cultural differences in China. How to reveal the cultural ground of entrepreneurial activities has become a focal point relating to cross-regional management and cross-regional venturing. But the research on such an area isn't enough up to date. And there are more need to have a good knowledge about it. Taking the limitations of former researches and the demand of reality into account, this paper aims to reveal the differences of entrepreneurial orientation from a cultural view and the differences of the cultures behind the entrepreneurial activities.Based on the theory of the compromise of the open society and the closed society, this paper selects two typical regions in China, Wenzhou and Guanzhong and tries to have a deeper study on the differences of entrepreneurial orientation from a cultural view. Meanwhile this paper tries to reveal the strength of entrepreneurial orientation of each region.Following the former researches, this paper tries to find a structure of culture dimensions and entrepreneurial orientation dimensions and arranges the study plan. What this paper focused on and found out are as following. (1) Comparing the cultural dimensions in Wenzhou with that in GuanzhongAfter reviewing of the literature of cultural dimensions, this part selected five dimensions of culture, power distance, uncertainty avoidance, collectivism/individualism, masculinity/femininity and achievement/ascription orientation, which were put forward by Hofstede (1980a) and Trompenaars (1993), as the cultural dimensions. Then the paper compared the cultural dimensions between Wenzhou and Guanzhong.The results showed that the Wenzhouness got more collectivism, more uncertainty avoidance, and more ascription orientation than Guanzhongness. Further test on the
    
    differences of traditional manifestations revealed that there exists stronger clan orientation in Wenzhou than that in Guanzhong. As to the tradition of doing business, the Wenzhouness valued the tradition more than Guanzhongness. Such conclusions about traditional manifestations are good fit to the conclusions about the cultural dimensions in the tow regions.Based on the conclusions above and in line with the review of the characteristics of the open society and closed society, the author infers that Wenzhou is belong to the closed society and Guanzhong is the reverse.(2) The relationship of culture and entrepreneurial orientationAfter giving a review of entrepreneur theory, this paper selected four characters of entrepreneurs, innovativeness, internal locus of control, proactiveness and hardworking orientation, as the entrepreneurial orientation dimensions among numerous dimensions of the characters of entrepreneurs. And it adopted the definition of entrepreneurial orientation named two-factor combined entrepreneurial orientation, combined of innovativeness and internal locus of control, which Muller & Thomas (2000) put forward in the former research. Further more this paper defined the four-factor combined entrepreneurial orientation, which is combined with the four dimensions of entrepreneurial orientation mentioned above. Then the paper put forward some hypothesis about the relation
引文
1. Ahmed, S.U. (1985). Risk-taking propensity, locus of control and entrepreneurship [J]. Personality and Individual Differences, 6(6): 781-782.
    2. Bao, G. M. (1999). The cultural infruence on ethnic business strategies [Z]. Working paper, TU Berlin, 1999.
    3. Baumol, W.J. (1986). Entrepreneurship and a century of growth [J]. Journal of Business Venturing, 2, 79-83.
    4. Begley, T.M., & Boyd, D.P. (1987). Psychological characteristics associated with performance in entrepreneurial firms and smaller business [J]. Journal of Business Venturing, 2, 79-93.
    5. Birch, D.L. (1979). The job generation process [M]. Cambridge. MA:M.I.T. Program on Neighborhood and Regional Change.
    6. Bird, B. (1989). Entrepreneurial behavior [M]. Glenview, IL: Scott Foresman.
    7. Birley, S. (1986). The role of new firms: Births, deaths and job generation [J]. Shalegic Management Journal, 7, 361-376.
    8. Birloy, S. (1984). The role of networks in the entrepreneurial process [J]. Journal of Business Venturing, 1:107-117.
    9. Blanning, T.C.W. (2002) The culture of power and the power of culture. Old regime Europe, 1660- 1789[M]. Oxford: Oxford university press.
    10. Brockhaus, R.H. (1980). The effect of job dissatisfaction on the decision to start a business [J]. Journal of Small Business Management, 18(1): 37-43.
    11. Brockhaus, R.H. (1982). The psychology of the entrepreneur [A]. In C.A. Kent, D.L. Sexton, & K.H. Vesper, Eds., Encyclopedia of entrepreneurship [C]. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
    12. Brockhaus, R.H., & Horwitz, PS. (1986). The psychology of the entrepreneur [A]. In C.A. Kent, D.L. Sexton, & K.H. Vesper (Eds.), Encyclopedia of entrepreneurship [C]. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
    13. Brown, T. E.; Davidsson, P. & Wiklund, J. (2001). An operationalization of Stevonson's conceptualization of entrepreneurship as opportunity-based firm behavior [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 22: 953-968.
    
    14. Busenitz, L., & Barney, J. (1997). Differences between entrepreneurs and managers in large organizations: biases and heuristics in strategic-making [J]. Journal of Business Venture 12: 9-30.
    15. Buttner, E.H. & Gryskiewicz, N. (1993). Entrepreneurs' problem-solving styles: an empirical study using the Kirton adaption/innovation theory [J]. Journal of Small Business Management, 31(1): 22-31.
    16. Carland, J.C. & Carland, J.W. (1991). An empirical investigation into the distinctions between male and female entrepreneurs and managers [J]. International Small Business Journal, 9(3): 62-72.
    17. Carland, J.W., Hoy, R, Boulton, W.R. and Carland, J.C. (1984). Differentiating entrepreneurs from small business owners: a conceptualization [J]. Academy of Management Review, 9(2): 354-359.
    18. Chinese Culture Connection. (1987). Chinese value and the search for culture-free dimensions of culture [J]. Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology, 18, 143-164.
    19. Chua, E. G. and Gudykunst, W. B. (1987). Conflict resolution styles in low- and high-context cultures[J]. Communication Research Reports, 4: 32-37.
    20. Clark, Terry. (1990). International marketing and national character: a review and proposal for an integrative theory [J]. Journal of Marketing, 54(4): 66-79.
    21. Cochran, T.C. (1949). Role and sanction in Amwrican entrepreneurial history [A]. In Harvard University Research Center in Entrepreneurial History, Change and The Entrepreneur [C]. Canbridge: Harvard University Press.
    22. Davis, L.E. and North, D.C. (1971). Institutional change and economic growth. [M]. London: Cambridge University Press.
    23. Decarlo, J.F., & Lyons, P.R. (1979). A comparison of selected personal characteristics of minority and nonminority female entrepreneurs [J]. Journal of Small Business Management, 17(4), 22-29.
    24. Dorfman, P. & Howell, J. (1988). Dimensions of National Culture and Effective Leadership Patterns: Hofstede Revisited [A], in Advances in International Corporative Management[C], JAI Press: 127-150.
    25. Drucker, P. (1985). Innovation and entrepreneurship: Practice and principles [M]. New York: Harper and Row.
    
    26. Dunbar, Roger L. M. and Bresser, Rudi K. F. (1994). How Cultural Differences Matter: The Case of German Reunification[R]. Working Paper #71/94, Free University of Berlin.
    27. Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research [J]. The Academy of Management Review, 14: 532-550.
    28. Eisenhardt, K.M. & Schoonhoven, C.B. (1990). Organization growth: kinking founding team, strategy, environment, and growth among U.S. semiconductor ventures,1978-1988 [J]. Adninistrative Science Quarterly, 35: 504-529.
    29. Eisenstdot, G. (1994). Japan's new business heroes [M]. Forbes, 4: 77-79.
    30. Erez, M. and Earley, P. C. (1993). Culture Self-identity, and Work[M]. New York: Oxford University Press.
    31. Feng chongyi. Seeking lost codes in the wildness: the search for a Hainanese culture[J]. The China Quartly, 1999:1036-56.
    32. Fiechtner, S.B. & Krayer, K.J. (1987). Variation in dogmatism and leader-supplied information: determinants of perceived behavior in task-oriented groups [J]. Group and Organizational Studies, 11(4), 403-18).
    33. Francis, D.H. & Sandberg, W.R. (2000). Friendship within entrepreneurial teams and its association with team and venture performance [J]. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 25(2): 27-37.
    34. Frese, M.; Brantjes, A. & Hoorn, R. (2002). Psychological success factors of small scale business in Namibia: the roles of strategy process, entrepreneurial orientation and the environment [J]. Journal of developmental entrepreneurship, 7(3): 259-282.
    35. Gabor, D. (1970). Innovations: scientific, technical and social [M]. Oxford: The University Press.
    36. Gartner, W.B. (1985). A conceptual framework for describing the phenomenon of new ventures creation [J]. Academy of Management Review, 10(4), 696-706.
    37. Gebert, D. & Boerner, S. (1999). The open and the closed corporation as conflicting forms of orgnization [J]. The Journal of Applied Behavioral science, 35(3): 341-359.
    38. Gibson, G. B. (1994). The Implication of National Culture for Organization
     Structure: An Investigation of Three Perspectives [A]. In Prasad, b. S. (Ed.), Advances in International Comparative Management[C], Vol. 9, Greenwich, CT: JAI Press: 3-38.
    
    39. Goldsmith, R.E. & Kerr, J.R. (1991). Entrepreneurship and adaption-innovation theory [J]. Techmovation, 11(6): 373-382.
    40. Goodman, D. (1983). Guizhou and the People's Republic of China: the development of an internal colony[A]. In Internal Colonialism: Essays Around a Theme[M]. Edited by David Drakakis Smith and Stephen Williams. London: The Institute of British Geographers, Developing Areas Rearch Group, Monograph No. 41. Gudykunst, W. B. & Nishida, T. (1986). Attributional confidence in low- and high-context cultures [J]. Human communication Rearch, 12, 525-549.
    42. Gunderson, G. (1989). The wealth creators [M]. New York: Teuman Talley Books.
    43. Hagen, E.E. (1962). On the theory of social change: How economic growth begins [M]. Home Wood, IL: Dorsey Press.
    44. Hall, E. T. (1976). Beyond culture [M], New York : Anchor Press.
    45. Harper, M. (1991). The role of enterprise in poor countries [J]. Entrepreneurship, Theory and Practice, 15(4), 8-11.
    46. Herron, L., & Robinson, R.B. (1993). A structural model of the effects of entrepreneurial characteristics on venture performance [J]. Journal of Business Venturing, 8, 281-294.
    47. Heslop, L. A., Papodopoulos, N. & Bourk, M. (1998). An interregional and intercultural perspective on subcultural differences in product evaluations [J]. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 15(2): 113-127.
    48. Hisrich, R.D. (1990). Entrepreneurship/intrapreneurship [J]. American Psychologist, 45(2), 209-222.
    49. Hofstede, G. (1980a). Culture's Consequences: International differences in Work-Related Values [M]. Sage Publications, The International Professional Publishers, Newbury Park, London, New Delhi: 21.
    50. Hofstede, G. (1980b). Motivation, leadership, and orgnization: do American theories apply abroad? [J]. Orgnizational Dynamics, Vol (9), No. 1: 42-63.
    
    51. Hofstede, G. (1983). Dimensions of national cultures in fifty countries and three regions [A]. In J. B. Deregowski, S. Dziurawiec et al. (Eds.), Expiscations in cross-cultural psychology [C]. Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger, 335-335.
    52. Hofstede, G. (1994). Cultural constrains in management theories [A]. International Review of Strategic Management [C], Vol (5). Edited by D.E. Hussey, John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
    53. Hofstede, G. (1994). Cultural Constraints in Management Theories [J]. International Review of Strategic Management, Vol. 5, John Wiley & Sons Ltd.: 39.
    54. Hofstede, G. (1997). Culture and organizations: Software of the mind [M]. New York: McGraw-Hill.
    55. Hofstede, G, & Bond, M. H. (1984). Hofstede's cultural dimensions [J]. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 15, 417-433.
    56. Hofstede, G, & Bond, M.H. (1988). The Confucius connection: From cultural roots to economic growth [J]. Organizational Dynamics, 16(4), 4-21.
    57. Hornaday, J.A. & Aboud, J. (1971). Characteristics of successful entrepreneurs [J]. Personnel Psychology, 24,141-153.
    58. Huisman, D. (1985). Entrepreneurship: economic and cultural influences on the entrepreneurial climate [J]. Eurpean Research, 13(4): 10-17.
    59. Jackson, D.N. (1994). Jackson Personality Inventory - Rvised Mannual. Port Heron, MI: Sigma Assessment System, Inc.
    60. Jaffe, E.D., Nebenzahl, I.D., & Gotesdyner, H. (1989). Machiavellianism, task orientaion, and team effectiveness revisited [J], Psychology Reports, 64(3), 819-824.
    61. Janz, W. R. (1992). The extension of identity into home fronts: two Milwaukee, Wisconsin neighborhoods [J]. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, 9(1): 48-63.
    62. Johnson, B.R. (1990). Toward a multidimensional model of entrepreneurship: The case of achievement motivation and the entrepreneur [J]. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 14:39-54.
    63. Johnston, H. (1993). Religio-nationalist subcultures under the communists:
     comparison from the Baltics, Transcaucasia and Ukraine [J]. Sociology of Religion, 54(3): 237-255.
    
    64. Kahle, L. R. (1986). The nine nations of north America and the value basis of geographic segmentation [J]. Journal of Marketing, 50: 37-47.
    65. Keegan, W. J. (1989). Global marketing management (4th ed.)[M], Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
    66. Kets de Vries, M.F.R. (1977). The entrepreneurial personality: a person at the crossroads [J]. Jouranl of Management Studies, 14(1): 34-57.
    67. Kilby, P. (1971). Hunting the Heffalump. In P. Kilby (Ed.), Entrepreneurship and Economic Development [M]. New York: Free Press.
    68. Kim, D., Pan, Y., & Park, H. S. (1998). High- versus low-context culture: A comparison of Chinese, Korean, and American cultures [J]. Psychology & Marketing, 15(6), 507-521.
    69. Kirton, M.J. (1976). Adaption and innovators: a description and measure [J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 61: 759-762.
    70. Kogut, B. (1991). Country Capabilities and The Permeability of Borders [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 12: 33-47.
    71. Krueger, N. (1993). The impact of prior entrepreneurial exposure on perceptions of new venture feasibility and desirability [J]. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 18(1): 5-21.
    72. Kwong, P. (1996). The Chinese diaspor [J]. World Business, May/Jun: 26-31.
    73. Laurent, A. (1983). The Cultural Diversity of Western Conceptions of Management[J]. International Studies of Management and Organization, 8: 75-96.
    74. Lee, D. Y. & Tsnng, E. W. K. (2001). The effects of entrepreneurial personality, background and network activities on venture growth [J]. Journal of Management Studies, 1:583-602.
    75. Lee, S.M., & Peterson, S.J. (2000). Culture, entrepreneurial orientation, and global competitiveness [J]. Journal of World Business, 35(4), 401-416.
    76. Lennartowicz, T. & Roth, K. (2001). Does subculture within a country matter? A cross-cultural study of motivational domains and business [J]. Journal of International Business Studies, 32(2):305-330.
    
    77. Lessem, R. (1993). Four worlds: The southern African business sphere [A]. In African Management: Philosophies, Concepts and Applications [M]. P. Christie, R. Lessem, & L. Mbigi, eds., Knowledge Resources. Randburg, South Africa.
    78. Louie, Kam. (1980). Critiques of Confucius in contemporary China [M]. Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press.
    79. Lumpkin, G.T.,& Dess, G.G. (1996). Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance [J]. Academy of Management Review, 21, 135-172.
    80. Luo, YD. and Chen, M. (1997). Does guanxi influence firm performance? [J]. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 14:1-16.
    81. Malhotra, N.K. (1993). Marketing research: An applied orientation [M]. England Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
    82. Markus,H. R. & Kitayama, s. (1991). Culture and the self: implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation [J]. Psychological Review, 98(2): 224-253.
    83. Martin, J.G., & Westie, F.R. (1959). The tolerant personality [J]. American Sociological Review, 24, 521-528.
    84. Martin, M.J. (1984). Managing technological innovation and entrepreneurship [M]. Reston, VA: Prentice Hall.
    85. McClelland, D.C. (1961). The achieving society [M], Princeton, NJ: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
    86. McClelland, D.C. (1987). Characteristics of successful entrepreneurs [J]. Journal of Creative Behavior, 21: 219-233.
    87. Mcgrath, R.G., MacLillan, I.C., and Scheinberg, S. (1992). Elitists, risk-takers, and rugged individualists? An exploratory analysis of cultural differences between entrepreneurs and non-entrepreneurs [J]. Journal of Business Venturing, 7: 115-135.
    88. Miles, M. P.; Arnold, D. R. & Thompson, D. L. (1993). The interrelationship between environmetal hostility and entrepreneurial orientation [J]. Journal of Applied business, 9(4): 12- 23.
    89. Miller, D. (1983). The correlates of entrepreneurship in three types of firmes. Management Science, 29:770-791.
    
    90. Moore, C.F. (1986). Understanding entrepreneurial behavior: a defmation and model [J]. Proceeding of the National Academy of Management, 67-70.
    91. Morris, M.H. (1998). Entrepreneurial intensity: sustainable advantages for individuals, organizations, and societies. West-port, CT: Quorum Books.
    92. Mueller, S.L., & Thomas, A.S. (2000). Culture and entrepreneurial potential: A nine country study of locus of control and innovativeness [J]. Journal of Business Venturing, 16, 51-75.
    93. Muller, T. E. (1989). The two nations of Canada vs. the nine nations of north America: a cross-cultural analysis of consumers' personal values [J]. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, l(4):57-79.
    94. Nahapiet, J. & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage [J]. Academy of Management Review, 23: 242-266.
    95. Oakes, Tim. (2000). China's provincial identities: reviving regionalism and reinventing "chineseness" [J]. The Journal of Asian Studies, 8:667-692.
    96. Okabe, R. (1983). Cultural assumptions of east and west: Japan and the United States.[A]. In E. Gudykunst (ed.), Intercultural communication theory: current perspectives[M]: 21-44. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
    97. Onkvisit, S. & Shaw, J. J. (1993). International marketing: analysis and strategy(2nd ed.)[M]. New York: Macmillan.
    98. Parnell, J. A. et.al. (2003). American and Chinese entrepreneurial and managerial orientations: a management education perspective [J]. International Journal of Management, 20(2): 125-137.
    99. Pascal, R. and Athos, A. (1982). The Art of Japanese Management[M]. Penquin, London.
    100.Poper, K.R. (1980). The open society and its enemies [M]. Tubingen, Germany:
    Francke. l01.Priem, R. L.; Love, L. G & Shaffer, M. (2000). Industrialization and values
    evolution: the case of Hong Kong and Guangxhou, China [J]. Asia Pacific Journal
    of Management, 17: 473-492. 102. Putnam, R.D. (1993). Making democracy work: civic traditions in modern
    Italy [M]. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
    
    103. Ralston, D. A., Gustafson, D. J., Cheung, F. M., & Terpstra, R. H. (1993). Differences in managerial values: A study of U.S., Hong Kong and PRC managers [J]. Journal of International Business Studies, 24(2), 249-275.
    104. Ralston, D. A., Yu, K. C, et al. (1996). The cosmopotitian Chinese managers [J]. Journal of International Management, 2(2).
    105. Redding, S.G. and Ng, M. (1982). The role of 'face' in the orgnizational perceptions of Chinese managers [J]. Orgnizational Studies, 3(3): 204-209.
    106. Redmon, M. V. (2000). Cultural distance as a mediating factor between stress and intercultural communication competence [J]. International Journal of Intercultural relations, 24, 151-159.
    107. Robinson, P.B., Stimpson, D.V., Huefner, J.C., and Hunt, H.K. (1991). An attitude approach to the prediction of entrepreneurship [J]. Entrepreneurship, Theory and Practice, 15(4): 13-31.
    108. Rosenthal, T.L. & Zimmerman, B.J. (1978). Social learning and cognition [M]. New York: Acdemic Press.
    109. Rotter, J.B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement [J]. Psychological Monographs, No. 609.
    110. Schein, E. H. (1992). Orgnizational culture and leadship[M]. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
    111. Scheinberg, S. & MacMillan, I. (1988). An eleven country study of ghe motivations to start a business [A]. In B. Kirchhoff, W. Long, W. McMullan, K.H. Vesper, and W. Wetzel, eds. Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research [M]. Wellesley, MA: Babson College.
    112. Schulze, Rolf, H.K. (1962). A shortened version of the Rokeach Dogmatism Scale [J]. Journal of Psychology Studies, 13, 92-97.
    113.Schumpeter, J.A. (1934). The theory of economic development [M]. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Press.
    114. Schumpeter, J.A. (1965). Economic theory and entrepreneurial history [A]. In Aitken, H.G.J. (Eds.), Explorations in Enterprise [C]. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    115. Schwartz, Shalom H. & Wolfgang Bilsky. (1987). Toward a Universal Psychological Structure of Human Values [J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53(3): 550-62.
    
    116. Sexton, D.L. & Bowman-Upton, N.B. (1986). Validation of personality index: comparative psychological characteristics analysis of female entrepreneurs, managers, entrepreneurship students and business students [A]. In R. Ronstadt, J. Hornaday, R. Peterson, and K. Vesper, eds., Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Reseach [M]. Wellesley, MA: Babson College.
    117.Shapero, A. (1975). The displaced, uncomfortable entrepreneur [J]. Psychology Today, 9(6), 83-88.
    118. Simons, J. (1996). The youth movement [Z]. U.S. News and World Report, September, 23:65-68.
    119. Smith, N.R. & Miner,J.B. (1985). Motivational considerations in the success of technologically innovative entrepreneurs: extended sample findings [A]. In J. Hornaday, E. Shile, J. Timmons, and K. Vesper, eds., Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Reseach [C]. Wellesley, MA: Babson College.
    120. Solomon, G.T. & Winslow, E.K. (1988). Toward a descriptive profile of the entrepreneur [J]. Journal of Creative Behavior, 22, 162-171.
    121. Spangler, W. D. (1992). The validity of questionnaire and TAT measures of achievement: Two meta-analysis [J]. Psychology Bulletin, 112: 140-154.
    122. Swain, F.S. (1985). The "new entrepreneur": An old answer for today's marketplace. Frontiers of Entrpreneurship Research [M], Wellesley, MA: Babson College Center for Entrepreneurial Studies, 400-408.
    123. Timmons, J.A. (1978). Characteristics and role demands of entrepreneurship [J]. American Journal of Small Business, 3, 5-17.
    124.Triandis, H., Bontempo, R., Villareal, M., Asai, M., Lucca, N. (1988). Individualism and Collectivism: Cross-Cultural Perspectives on Self-Ingroup Relationships [J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 54(2): 323-338.
    125.Triands, H. C. (1995). Individualism and collectivism [M]. Boulder CO: Westview Press.
    126. Trompenaars, F. (1993). Riding the waves of culture: Understanding culture diversity in business [M]. London: Nicholas Brealey
    
    127. Tsang, E.W.K. (1996) . In search of legitimacy: the private entrepreneur in China [J]. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 21(1) : 21-30.
    128. Tse, D. K., Lee, K., Vertinsky, I., and Wehrung, D. A. (1988) . Does culture matter? Across-cultural study of executives' choice, decisiveness, and risk adjustment in international marketing [J]. Journal of Marketing, 52: 81-95.
    129. Yusuf, A. (2002) . Envitonmental uncertainty, the entrepreneurial orientation of business ventures and performance [J]. International Journal of Commerce & Management, 12(3&4) : 83-103.
    130. Zahra, S. A. & Neubaum, D. O. (1998) . Environmental adversity and the entrepreneurial activities of new ventures [J]. Journal of developmental entrepreneurship, 3(2) : 123-140.
    131. 宝贡敏、缪仁炳.东西部工作价值观差异比较与区域经济--对浙江杭州与 广西南宁周过地区的调查分析[J].浙江社会科学,2003(5) :109-113.
    132. 宝贡敏.论适合我国文化特点的企业管理模式[J].浙江大学学报(人文社会 科学版),2000(6) :5-14.
    133. 蔡克骄.瓯越文化史[M].北京:作家出版社,1998.
    134. 曹锦清、张乐天、陈中亚.当代浙北乡村的社会文化变迁[M].上海:上海远 东出版社,2001.
    135. 查理斯·汉普登-特纳、丰斯·特龙彭纳斯.国家竞争力--创造财富的价值 体系[M].海口:海南出版社,1997.
    136. 陈金川.地缘中国:区域文化精神与国民地域性格[M].北京:中国档案出版 社,1998.
    137. 陈俊民.张载哲学思想及关学学派[M].北京:人民出版社,1986.
    138. 陈凌.信息特征、交易成本和家族式组织[J].经济研究,1998(7) :27-32.
    139. 陈万雄.中国地域文化大系[M].香港:商业出版社,1996.
    140. 仇保兴.小企业集群研究[M].上海:复旦大学出版社,1999.
    141. 储小平.家族企业研究:一个具有现代意义的话题[J].中国社会科学,2000 (5) : 51-58.
    142. 道格拉斯·C·诺斯.制度、制度变迁与经济绩效[M].上海:上海三联书店, 1994.
    143. 丁栋虹.制度变迁中企业家成长模式研究[M].南京:南京大学出版社,1999.
    
    144. 费孝通.乡土中国[M].北京:商务印书馆,1947.
    145. 费孝通.行行重行行[M].银川:宁夏人民出版社,1992.
    146. Trompenaars和Hampden-Turner.在文化的波涛中冲浪--理解工商管理中 的文化多样性[M].北京:华夏出版社,2003.
    147. 甘德安等.中国家族企业研究[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,2002.
    148. 葛承雍.秦陇文化志[M].上海:上海人民出版社,2001.
    149. 胡军、王霄、钟永平.华人企业管理模式及其文化基础--以港、台及大陆 为例实证研究的初步结果[J].管理世界,2002(12) :104-113.
    150. 黄新亚.三秦文化[M].沈阳:辽宁教育出版社,1998.
    151. 金祥荣、朱希伟.专业化产业区的起源与演化[J].经济研究,2002(8) :25-32.
    152. 库珀.社会科学百科全书[M].上海:上海译文出版社,1989.
    153. 李刚、赵晓东.陕西掌柜[M].福州:福建人民出版社,2001.
    154. 李红、张仁寿.专业市场体系[J].探索,1986(3) .
    155. 李勤德.中国区域文化[M].太原:山西高教联合出版社,1995.
    156. 李仁续、黄加劲.农民离土经商[J].农业经济丛刊,1984(5) .
    157. 李新春.中国的家族制度与企业组织[J].中国社会科学季刊(香港),1998(3) .
    158. 林强、姜彦福、张健.创业理论及其架构分析[J].经济研究,2001(9) :85-93.
    159. 卢盛忠.管理心理学[M].杭州:浙江教育出版社,1985.
    160. 罗宾斯.管理学[M].北京:人民大学出版社,1998,
    161. 马月才.华人企业的管理模式[A].在游汉民编著.华人管理本土化的开拓 [M].香港:香港城市大学商学院华人管理研究中心,2001.
    162. 毛月,一个村落共同体的变迁--关于尖山下村的单位化的观察与阐释[M]. 上海:学林出版社,2000.
    163. 沙莲香.中国民族性(二)[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,1990.
    164. 史晋川.浙江的现代化进程与发展模式[J].浙江社会科学,1999(3) :13-17.
    165. 唐海彬主编.陕西省经济地理[M].北京:新华出版社,1987.
    166. 王沪宁.当代中国村落家族文化--对中国社会现代化的一项探索[M].上 海:上海人民出版社,1991.
    167. 王缉慈等.创新的空间:企业集群与区域发展[M].北京:清华大学出版社, 2001.
    168. 王晓毅、朱成堡.中国乡村的民营企业与家族经济--浙江省苍南县项东村 调查[M].太原:山西经济出版社,1996.
    16
    
    169. 王效民.文化差异对地区经济的不同影响[J].生产力研究,1998(2) :56-58.
    170. 夏建中.文化人类学理论学派--文化研究的历史[M].北京:中国人民大学 出版社,1997.
    171. 辛向阳.人文中国:中国南北情貌与人文精神[M].北京:中国社会出版社, 1996.
    172. 许红.文化的源与流--文化人类学简介[M].武汉:湖北人民出版社,1989.
    173. 徐纪良.现代人力资源概论[M].上海:上海人民出版社,1996
    174. 杨国枢.家族化历程、泛家族主义及组织管理[A].在郑伯壎、黄国隆、郭 建志主编.海峡两岸组织与管理[M].台北:远流出版公司, 1998.
    175. 杨懋春.中国家族主义与国民性格[A].选自中国人的性格[M].台北:台湾全 国出版社,1981.
    176. 杨益群.正确认识、处理文化与市场经济的关系[J].特区经济,1997(2) : 27-28.
    177. 杨涌泉.温州人生意经--中国的“犹太人”[M].北京:企业管理出版社, 2003.
    178. 杨知勇.家族主义与中国文化[M].昆明:云南大学出版社,2000.
    179. 姚先国.浙江经济改革中的地方政府行为评析[J].浙江社会科学,1999(3) : 21-27.
    180. 余凯成、程文文、陈维政.人力资源管理[M].大连理工大学出版社,1999.
    181. 袁安府.我国企业家的成长与激励[C].博士论文,2001.
    182. 袁峰.制度变迁与稳定--中国经济转型中稳定问题的制度对策研究[M]. 上海:复旦大学出版社,1999.
    183. 郑达炯.温州改革--理论思考与实践探索[M].上海:复旦大学出版社, 1991.
    184. 张荷.吴越文化[M].沈阳:辽宁教育出版社,1991.
    185. 张继焦.市场化中的非正式制度[M].北京:文物出版社,1999.
    186. 张仁寿,李红.温州模式研究[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,1990.
    187. 赵洪恩、李宝席.中国传统文化通论[M].北京:人民出版社,2003.
    188. 朱仁宏.创业研究:定义、研究边界与研究焦点[A].在南开大学首届创业学 暨企业家精神教育研讨会会议论文集[C].2003:408-418.