短时距标量计时模型研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
先前有关时间信息加工的研究主要局限于极短时距(小于5s),实验多采用双任务程序、听觉呈现刺激,以字词为实验材料而进行的。虽然少数研究对计时模型中时间信息加工的结构特征进行了初步探讨,研究者对于影响短时距判断的信息源和信息加工的动态过程没有给出系统分析;该问题仍然是时间心理学领域有待于深入探讨的重要课题。本研究在综述和探讨先前有关理论和研究的基础上,采用预期式研究范式,创造性地使用单任务研究程序,以视觉方式呈现刺激并且实验中选用几何刺激物,在对数据进行统计分析的基础上,从心理物理学的视角,通过六个实验系统地考查了影响被试短时距(6s至24s)估计的信息源、转换点及韦伯函数的形态,同时对短时距估计的标量计时模型的基本结构和过程进行了构建。
     实验一的结果表明,刺激物的运动状态(运动或静止)显著地影响着被试的时间判断,与静止的实验条件相比,运动着的刺激由于包含更多的变化因而具有更加显著的实验效应。物理时距因素对于被试的时距估计产生了极其显著的时距延长效应。
     实验二的结果表明,旋转角度因素对被试短时距估计的影响极其显著。旋转角度的减少使得被试低估时距,而旋转角度的增加不仅使得时距估计呈高估倾向,而且被试时间判断的准确性也随之提高。
     实验三的结果表明,刺激物的物理时距对于被试的短时距估计具有极其显著的延长效应。刺激速度也是显著地影响被试时间判断能力的一个重要线索,从整体上说,快速运动的刺激延长时间估计,尤其是对于较长时距(18s至24s)来说更加明显,较短时距(6s至12s)中体现出来的速度延长效应不明显。刺激物沿顺时针和逆时针方向的旋转变化对时距判断没有显著的影响,时距和速度因素对于被试的时间估计能力产生显著的交互作用,其他二阶和三阶交互作用没有达到显著性水平。综观实验一、
Past studies of temporal information processing limited to extreme short durations(shorter than 5s), and the dual-task programs were used by most researchers. Experiments were conducted with acoustic stimulus and lexical materials presented. Although the construct nature of temporal information processing was emphasized in some past studies, the source of information and the kinetic processes of temporal information processing were not analysed systematicly, these topics remain open questions in time field. Based on the summarizes and investigations about past theories and studies, we selectly use the prospective paradigm and creatively use the single-task program in this research. Experiments are conducted with geometric stimulus presented in visual mode, and the analysis of variance are made on data from this research. By taking perspectives of psychophysics, we use six experiments to explore the source of information, the transational point, and the Weber's function in the timing process of humans. The basic process of the scalar timing model are also constructed in this research.Experiment1 shows: The motion status (kinetic or static) of stimulus significantly affect temporal judgments of subjects. Compared with static experimental conditions, the effect of the kinetic stimulus are more significant because of more changes including in them. As a factor, physical duration is also an important cue influencing subjects' duration estimation.Experiment2 shows: The rotating angle of stimulus significantly affect subjects' time judgments, and the decrease of which make subjects underestimate duration. With the increase of the rotating angle, the value and the accuracy of time judgments are increased.
    Experiments shows: Physical duration of stimulus shows a significant duration-longthened effect. The speed of stimulus is an important factor used by subjects in estimation of short duration, fast-moving stimulus can increase value of duration estimation. There is a significant interaction between the duration and the speed, the effect of rotating of stimulus and other two-order or three-order interactions in this experiment are not significant. The combination of the results of experiment 1 > experiment and experiments imply that the weber's function is a continuous function with break points,. Transational points of the weber's function are 12s > 18s and 21s, which are the same as the critical point of 11.1s of duration estimation discovered in this research in some extent.Experiment4 shows: The break positions of stimulus significantly affect subjects' time judgments, in the two conditions of 2s and 8s, all subjects overestimate duration, and their time sensitivity increase with the longth of the break position. The break duration is not an important cue used by subjects in time judgments. There is no significant interaction between the break position and the break duration(interruption interval).Experiment5 shows: The effect of the break position is significant. A V-shaped function can describe the relationship between duration production and the break position. Besides that, significant effect of activation and interaction between activation and the break duration are discovered in this experiment, through the further simple effect analysis, we know that subjects' timing behavior are extremely affected by activation in all three conditions of 2s > 3s and 4s. Temporal judgments of subjects are not relate to the break duration. No other significant interaction is discovered in this experiment.Experiment6 shows: The same as the results of experiment4 and experiments, there is a significant effect of break position. In condition of 5s waiting duration, the value of subjects' response variance is the largest, the value of time estimation is the smallest, and the activation level is the highest at the same time. In trails without breaks, subjects' response variance is the smallest, the value of time estimation is the largest. The cue factor nested in these conditions shows a significant experimental effect. Subjects produce the larger value of duration estimation in the uncued conditions of trails without breaks than in the cued conditions of trails without breaks. Becouse no cues are presented in trails with breaks, subjects have gained a high expecting-level of a break in uncued conditions of trails without
    breaks and a relative low expecting- level of a break in cued conditions of trails without breaks. The fact that subjects produce a shorter value of duration estimation in cued conditions of trails without breaks reflects that expecting of a break can longthen the time estimation. Break duration is not a factor influencing subjects' time judgments, and the combined effect of break duration and the break position is not discovered in this experiment.Synthesizing the results of six experiments of this research and inspecting the source of information affecting processing of temporal information, we know that The information source of temporal judgment not only include physical factors and physiological factors, but also include cognitive factors and other psychological factors. The motion n the change n the speed of stimulus and the internal tempo of subjects, which belong to the physical factors and the physiological factors, significantly affect subjects' temporal judgments. Activation^ attention preceded cues ^ a break in timing task and the expecting of a break of subjects affect their internal timing system, so significant effects are discovered on temporal estimation behavior of humans.We construct the scalar model on the basis of past studies and this research, which include four kinetic processes such as the clock process n the accumulating process % the memory process and the comparison process. In the level of clock-process and the accumulating process, we know that humans' temporal processing rely on a "pacemaker-accumulator" system, it is also called the "clock-accounter" system. The absence of the interaction between the break position and the break duration imply that subjects' timing behavior is not affected by break duration. The kinetic processes of temporal information processing are controlled by a "switch", by which the temporal information processing flow from one level to the next level. In trails with breaks, the absence of the interaction between the break position (waiting duration) and the activation level show that activation and attention affect different parts of information processing of humans. The two control different cognitive process apparatus—the rate of the pacemaker and the opening of the switch, The pulses produced by the pacemaker, which have some frequencies, are accumulated in the accumulator through the switch. It is the accumulated pulses that form the basis of time cognition of humans. Attention is often interrupted by a
引文
西南师范大学心理学系,黄希庭心理学文选,西南师范大学出版社,2000
    黄希庭,心理学导论,人民教育出版社,1991
    黄希庭,未来时间的心理结构,心理学报,1994,26(2):110-126
    黄希庭、徐光国,对变化分割模型的检验(Ⅰ)心理学报,1997,29(3):326-334
    黄希庭、徐光国,对变化分割模型的检验(Ⅱ)心理学报,1999,31(2):135-141
    黄希庭、孙承惠,时间词义赋值特征的分析,心理学报,1991,24(3):243-248
    黄希庭、孙承惠,模糊篇序关系在心理学中的应用,心理学报,1992,25(2)135-141
    黄希庭、郑涌,时间记忆的理论与实验范型,心理科学,1995,18(4):201-205
    刘瑞光、黄希庭,运动视觉中时间知觉线索的实验研究,心理学报,1999,31(1):3-15
    刘瑞光、黄希庭,运动视觉中计时行为的控制操作理论,应用心理学,1998,1,
    刘瑞光,运动视觉中时间知觉信息加工透视,心理科学,2000,31(5):614-615
    刘瑞光,运动视觉中时间知觉信息源的研究,西南师范大学学报,1997,23(6):
    柳学智、多种因素对时间连续阈限的影响,心理学报,1993,26(3):226-231
    王振勇、黄希庭,顺序信息记忆的研究范型与加工机制,心理学动态,1996,4(1)30-35
    王振勇、黄希庭,时间信息加工机制及其通道效应的实验研究,心理科学,1997,28(4):345-351
    王振勇、黄希庭,时序信息的加工:自动还是控制,心理科学,1997,20(1):23-30
    李伯约,从时间知觉到时间心理学,西南师范大学学报,2000,26(6):118-122
    沈政、林庶芝,认知神经科学导论,内蒙古教育出版社,1994
    杨治良,实验心理学,台湾东华书局,1998
    舒华,心理与教育研究中的多因素实验设计,北京师范大学出版社,1994
    王重鸣,心理学研究方法,人民教育出版社,1998
    孟庆茂、常建华,实验心理学,北京师范大学出版社,1998
    张厚粲,心理与教育统计学,北京师范大学出版社,1986
    成世学、严颖等,概率统计,中国人民大学出版社,1994
    杨伦标、高英仪,模糊数学—原理及应用,华南理工大学出版社,1993
    彭聃龄,普通心理学,北京师范大学出版社,2001
    Allan, L. G.(1979). The perception of time. Perception & Psyehophysics, 26, 340-354.
    Allan, L. G., & Gibbon, J.(1991). Human bisection at the geometric mean. Learning and Motivation, 22,39-58.
    Allan, L. G.(1998). The influence of the scalar timing model on human timing research. Behavioural Processes, 44,101 - 117.
    Brown, S. W.(1997). Attentional resources in timing: Interferrence effects in concurrent temporal and nontemporal working memory tasks. Perception & Psychophysics, 59,1118-1140.
    Burle, B., & Bonnet, M.(1999). What's an internal clock for? From temporal information processing to temporal processing of information. Behavioural Processes, 45, 59-72.
    Brown , S. W (1995). Time, Change, and motion: The effects of stimulus movement on temporal perception. Perception & Psychophysics, 57(1), 105-116
    Burle, B., & Casini, L.(2001). Dissociation Between Activation and Attention Effects in Time Estimation: Implications for Internal Clock Models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27(1), 195-205
    Burle, B., & Bonnet, M.( 1997). Further argument for the existence of a pacemaker in the human information processing system. Acta Psychologica, 97,129-143.
    Babad,E., Avni, B. D., & Rosenthals, R.(2003). Teacher's brief nonverbal behaviors in defined instructional situations can predict students' evaluation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 553-562.
    Block, R. A.(Eds.). (1990a). Cognitive models of psychological time. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
    Boltz, M. G.(1994). Changes in Internal Tempo and Effects on the Learning and Remembering of Event Duration, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, Cognition, 20(5), 1154-1171.
    Bolts, M.G.(1993). Time estimation and expectancies. Memory and Cognition, 21, 853-863.
    Barnes, R.,& Jones, M. R.(2000). Expectancy, attention, and Time. Cognitive Psychology, 41, 254-311.
    Casini, L., & Macar, F.(1997). Effecs of attention manipulation on perceived duration and intensity in the visual modality. Memory & Cognition, 25, 812-818.
    Collyer, C. E., Broadbent, H. A., & Church, R. M. (1994). Preferred rates of re petitive tapping and categorical time production. Perception and Psychophysics, 55,443-453.
    Church, R. M., & Broadbent, H.A.(1990). Alternative representation of time, number, and rate. Cognition, 37, 55-81.
    Collier, G. L.,& Ogden, R.T.(2004). Adding Drift to the Decomposition of Simple Isochronous Tapping: An Extention of the Wing-Kristofferson Model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30(5), 853-872.
    Dinah, A.B., & Ritov, I.(2003). Routine and Perception of Time. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132(4), 543-550.
    Dosher, B., & Lu, Z. L.(2000a). Mechanism of perceptual attention in precuing of location. Vision Research, 40,1269-1292.
    Dreisbach, G., Haide, H, & Kluwe, R.H. (2002). Preparatory Processes in the Use of Probability Cues. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28(3), 468-483.
    Dyson, B. J., & Quinlan, P. T.(2003). Feature and conjunction processing in the auditory modality. Perception & Psychophysics, 65, 254-272.
    Drake, C, & Bott, M. C.(1993). Tempo sensitivity in auditory sequences: Evidence for a multiple- look model. Perception and Psychophysics, 54: 277-286.
    Eisler, H. & Eisler, A.D.A(1991). Mathematical model of for time perception with experimentally obtained subjective time scales for humans and rats. Chronobiologia, 18, 79-88.
    Eisler, H., & Eisler,A. D.(1992) Tune Perception Effects of Sex and Sound. Intensity on Scales of Subjective Duration Scandinavian. Journal of Psychology, 33, 339-358.
    Fisher, J.F, & Aslin, R.N.(2002). Stitistical Learning of Higher-Order Temporal Structure From Visual Shape Sequences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28(3), 458-467.
    Fortin, C, & Masse, N.(2000). Expecting a break in time estimation: Attentional time -sharing without concurrent processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology:
     Human Perception and Performance, 26,1788-1796.
    Fraisse, P.(1984). Perception and estimation of time. Annual Review of Psychology, 35,1-36.
    Friberg, A., & Sundberg, J.(1995). Time discrimination in a monotonic, isochronic sequence. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 98, 2524-2531.
    Friedman, W. J.(1993). Memory for Time of Past Events. Psychological Bulletin, 113(1), 44-66.
    Getty, D(1975). Discrimination of short temporal intervals: A comparasion of two models. Perception and Psychophysics, 18,1-8.
    Getty, D.( 1976). Counting processes in human timing. Perception and Psychophysics, 20,191-197
    Gibson, J.J. (1975). Events are perceivable but time is not. In J. T. Fraser& N. Lawrence (Eds.). The study of time II. New York: Springer-Verlag. 295-301.
    Gibbon, J. (1977). Scalar expectency theory and Weber's law in the animal timing. Psychological Review, 84, 279-325.
    Gibbon, J., Church, R. M., & Meck, W. H.(1984). Scalar timing in memory. In J. Gibbon & Allan, L.(Eds.), Annals of the New York academy of Science: 423, Timing and time perception. New York: New York Academy of Science. 52-77.
    Grondin, S.(2001). From Physical Time to the First and Second Moments of Psychological Time. Psychological Bulletin, 127(1), 22-44.
    Grondin, S., Meilleur, W. G., & Lachance, R.(1999). When to start explicit counting in a time-intervals discrimination task: A critical point in the timing process of humans. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 993-1004.
    Grondin, S.(2000). Discrimination time intervals presented in sequences marked by visual signals. Manuscript submitted for publication, 424-433.
    Grondin, S.(2001a). Discriminating time intervals presented in sequences marked by visual signals. Perception & Psychophysics, 63, 1214-1228.
    Grondin, S.(2001c). A temporal account of the limited processing capacity. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 24, 122-123.
    Harold, P.(2001). Perception and Production of Brief Duradion: Beat-Based Versus Internal-Based Timing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27(2), 485-493.
    Hirsh, I., Monahan, C. B., Grant K. W., & Singh, P. G.(1990). Studies on auditory timing: 1. Simple pattern. Perception and Psychophysics, 47,215-226.
    Hicks, R.E., Miller, G. A., & Kinsbourne, M.(1976). Prospective and retrospective judgments of time as a function of amount of information processed. American Journal of Psychology, 89, 719-730.
    Hicks, R.E., Miller, G .W., Gaes, G., & Bierman, K.(1977). Concurrent processing demands and the experience of time-in- passing . American Journal of Psychology, 90, 431-446.
    Hicks, J.L., Marsh, R. L., & Russell, E. J.(2000). The Properties of Retention Intervals and Their Affect on Retaining Prospective Memories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26(5), 1160-1169
    Hinton, S. C, & Meek, W. H.(1997). The internal clocks of circadian and interval timing. Endeavour, 21, 3-8.
    Heij, W. L., Van, A. H. C, & Plooij, P.(2001). A Paradoxical Exposure-Duration Effect in the Stoop Task: Temporal Segretion Between Stimulus Attributes Facilitates Selection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27(3), 622-632.
    Ivry, R. B., & Hazeltine, R. E.(1995). The perception and production of temporal intervals across a range of duration: Evidence for a common timing mechanism. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21,3-18.
    Ivry, R. B.(1996). The representation of temporal information in perception and motor control. Concurrent Opinion in Neurobiology, 6, 851-857.
    Jones, M. R., & Yee, W.(1997). Sensitivity to time change : The role of context and skill. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 693-709.
    Jason, L. H., March, R. L., & Russell E. J.(2000). The Properties of Retention Internals and Their Affect on Retaining Prospective Memories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26(5), 1160-1169.
    Kello, C. T.(2004). Control Over the Time Course of Cognition in the Tempo-Naming Task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30(5), 942-955.
    Knoblich, G. & Kircher, T. T.(2004). Deceiving Oneself About Being in Control: Conscious Detection of Changes in Visuomotor Coupling. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30(4), 657-666.
    Kim, K., & Glanzer, M.(1993). Speed Versus Accurity Instruction, Study Time, and the Mirror Effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, Cognition, 19(3), 638-652.
    Kesner, R. P.(1998). Neural mediation of memory for time: Role of the hippocampus and medial prefrontal cortex. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 5,585-596.
    Kornblum, S., Stevens, G. T., Whipple, A., & Requin, J.(1999). The effects of irrelevant stimili: The time course of stimulus-stimulus and stimulus-response consistency effects with Stroop-like stimuli, Simon-like tasks, and their factorial combinations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25(2), 688-714.
    Kristofferson, A. B. (1980). A quantal step function in duration discrimination. Perception and Psychophysics, 27, 300-306.
    Kristofferson, A. B. (1977). A real-time criterion theory of duration discrimination. Perception and Psychophysics, 21,105-117.
    Lejeune, H.(1998). Switching or gating ? The attentional challenge in cognitive models of psychological time. Behavioral Processes, 44,127-145.
    Large, E. W., & Jones, M. R.(1999). The dynamics of attending: How people track time-varying events. Psychological Review, 106,119-159.
    Lamb, M. R., & Yund, E. W.(1999). Is Attentional Selection to Different Levels of Hierarchical Structure Based on Spatial Frequency? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 128(1), 88-94.
    Lustig, C, & Meck, W. H.(2001). Paying attention to time as one gets older. Psychological Science, 12, 478-484.
    Macar, F, Grondin, S., & Casini, L.(1994). Controlled attention sharing influence time
     estimation. Memory & Cognition, 22,673- 686.
    Madison, G. (2001). Variability in Isochronous Tapping : Higher Order Dependencies as a Function of Intertap Interval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27(2), 411 -422.
    Macar, G. & Toby, M.(2001). Temporal Stimulus- Response Compatibility. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27(4), 870-878.
    Mash, R.L., & Hicks, J.(1998). Event-Based Prospective Memory and Executive Control of Working Memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24(2), 336-349.
    Matell, M. S., & Meck, W. H.(2000). Neuropsychological mechanisms of interval timing behavior. BioEssays, 22,94-103.
    Mayer, N., & Keele, S.(2000). Changing internal constraints on action: The role of backward inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1,4-26
    McAuley, J. D., & Jones, M. R.(2003). Modeling Effects of Rhythmic Context on Perceived Duration: A Comparison of Interval and Entrainment Approaches to Short-Interval Timing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29(6), 1102-1165.
    McAuley, J. D., & Kidd, G. R.(1998). Effects of deviations from temporal expectations on tempo discrimination of isochronous tone sequences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24,1786-1800.
    McGlone, M. S., & Harding, J.(1998). Back( or Forward) to the future: The Role of Prospective in Temporal Language Comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24(5), 1211-1223.
    Meck, W. H.(1983). Selective adjustment of the speed of the internal clock and memory processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 9 , 171-201.
    Meck, W. H.(1996). Neurophamacology of timing and time perception. Cognitive Brain Research, 3,227-242.
    Miall, C.(1989). The storage of time intervals using oscillating neurons. Neural Computation, 1,359-371.
    Michael, J. K., Marc, H. W., & Arthur, W.(2002). Age Dissociates Recency and Lag Recency Affects Free Recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28(3), 530-540.
    Mosher, N. B., & Guez, J.(2002). Effects of Divided Attention on Encoding and Retrieval Processes; Assessment of Attentional Costs and a Componentional Analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Lrarning, Memory, and Cognition, 26(6), 1461-1482.
    Oberauer, K. & Kliegl, R.(2004). Simultaneous Cognitive Operations in Working Memory After Dual-Task Practice. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30(4), 689-707.
    Pashler, H.(2001). Perception and production of brief duration: Beat-based versus interval-based timing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 485-493.
    Penton-Voak, I. S., Edwards, H., Percival, A., & Wearden , J. H. (1996). Speeding up an interval clock in humans? Effects of click trains on subjective duration. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 22, 307-320.
    Philip, P. T.(2004). Visual Feature Integration Theory: Past, Present, and Future. Psychological Bulletin, 129(5), 643-673.
    Pollatsek, A., & Well, A. D.(1995). On the Use of Counterbalanced Designs in Cognitive Research: A Suggestion for a Better and More Powerful Analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21(3), 785-794.
    Radvansky, G. A., & Zwaan, R.A.(1998). Retrieval Information from Temporally Organized Situation Models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24(5), 1224-1237.
    Repp, B. H.(2002b). Perception of timing is more context sensitive than sensorimotor synchronization. Perception & Psychophysics, 64,703-716.
    Rinck, M., Hahnel, A., & Becker, G.(2001). Using Temporal Information to Construct Update and Retrieves Situation Models of Narratives. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27(1), 67-80.
    Ruthruff, E., Remington, R. W., & Johnston, J. C.(2001). Switching between simple cognitive tasks: The interaction of top-down and bottom- up factors. Journal of
     Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27,1404-1409.
    Rammsayer, T. H., & Leutner, D.(1996). Temporal discrimination as a function of maker duration. Perception and Psychophysics, 58, 1213-1223.
    Rammsayer, T. H.(1994). Effects of practice and signal energy on duration discrimination of brief auditory intervals. Perception and Psychophysics, 55,454-464.
    Rammsayer, T. H., & Lima, S. D.(1991). Duration discrimination of filled and empty auditory intervals: Cognitive and perceptual factors. Perception and Psychophysics, 50, 565-574.
    Rammsayer, T. H., & Skrandies, W. (1997). Stimulus characteristics and temporal information processing: Psychophysical and electrophysiological data. Journal of Psychophysiology, 12,1-12.
    Roberts, S.(1987). Evidence for distinct serial processes in animals: The multiplicative-factors method. Animal Learning and Behavior, 15,135-173.
    Schmidt, R. A., & Lee, T. D.(1999). Motor control and Learning: A behavioral emphasis(3rd ed.). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
    Schwarz, W., & Stain, F.(1998). On the Temporal Dynamics of Digit Comparison Processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24(5), 1275-1293.
    Simon, G.(2001) From physical time to the first and second moments of psychological time. Psychological Bulletin, 127(1): 22-44.
    Son, L. K., & Janet, M.(2000). Metacognition and Control Strategies in Study-Tune Allocation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26(1), 204-221.
    Staddon, J. E. R., & Higa, J. J.(1999). Time and Memory: Towards a pacemaker-free theory of interval timing. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 71,215-251.
    Slifkin, A. B., & Newell, K. M.(1999). Noise, Information Transmission, and Force Variability. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25(3), 837-851.
    Tayama, T., Nakamura, M., & Aiba, T. S.(1987). Estimated duration for rotating-spot-pattern. Japanese Psychological Research, 29,173-183.
    Thomas, E. A., & Weaver, W. B. (1975). Cognitive processing and time perception. Perception & Psychophysics, 17,363-367.
    Treisman, M., Faulkner, A., & Naish, P. L. N.(1992). On the relation between time perception and the timing of motor action: Evidence for a temporal oscillator controlling the timing of movement. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 45A, 235-263.
    Treisman, M., Faulkner, A., Naish, P. L. N., & Brogan, D.(1990). The internal clock: Evidence for a temporal oscillator underlying time perception with some estimates of its characteristic frequency. Perception, 19, 705-743.
    Treisman, M. (1993). On the structure of the temporal sensory system. Psychologica Belgica, 33,271-293.
    Treisman, M, Cook, N., Naish, P. L. N., & MacCrone, J. K. (1994). The internal clock: Electroenciphalographic evidence for oscillatory processes underling time perception. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47A, 241 -289.
    Ulrich, R., Rinkenhauer, G., & Miller, J.(1998). Effects of stimulus duration and intensity on simple reaction time and response force. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 915-928.
    Wearden, J. H.(1992). Temporal generalization in humans. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 18,134-144.
    Wearden, J. H.(1993). Dicisions and memories in human timing. Psychologica Belgica, 33, 241-253.
    Wearden, J. H.(1995). Categorical scaling of stimulus duration by humans. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 21, 318-330.
    Wearden, J. H., & Penton-Voak, I. S.(1995). Feeling the heat: Body temperature and the rate of subjective time revisited. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 48B(2), 129-141.
    Wearden, J. H., Philpott, K., & Win, T.(1999). Speeding up and (...relatively...) slowing down an internal clock in humans. Behavioral processes, 46, 63-73.
    Wearden, J. H.(1999). "Beyond the fields we know...": Exploring and developing scalar timing theory. Behavioral Processes, 45, 3-21.