甘肃莲花山自然保护区游憩活动冲击的调查评估及环境保护管理对策
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
本文采用既成事实分析的方法,以甘肃莲花山国家级自然保护区为例,研究了游憩活动对保护区植被和土壤的冲击状况及游客对环境变化的心理状态。主要探讨了三大方面研究内容主要探讨了3大方面研究内容:保护区游憩活动对植被及植物群落造成的冲击影响;游憩活动对土壤理化性质所受冲击引起的影响;游客对由游憩活动而导致的环境变化的对环境所产生影响的可接受程度。并在此基础上,对甘肃莲花山自然保护区提出了环境保护管理策略,以期达到保护区生态效益、经济效益兼顾的可持续发展目的。研究结果为以下几方面其得到研究分析的结果:
     1)游憩活动对甘肃莲花山国家级自然保护区部分景点和地段的植被造成不同程度冲击,游客践踏对环境的冲击并不严重,游客影响一般沿步道两侧呈带状出现,并在一些较宽敞地段形成结点。
     2)由于4个调查点植被冲击指数级别均属于I级,且这4个调查节点是整个莲花山自然保护区最具有代表性的区域,所以可推知,整个莲花山自然保护区人类游憩活动对当地植被群落的冲击程度均属于轻微(冲击指数均属于冲击指数均为I级);与国内同类研究结果比较,又根据与国内同类研究结果比较,游憩活动对甘肃省莲花山国家级自然保护区植被的冲击程度在国内在国内是相对较低的,其冲击对植被的影响是在保护区环境可承受范围以内。
     3)所调查的4个节点中,游客对土壤冲击严重程度按从大到小的顺序排列为:保护区管理局>紫霄宫>唐坊滩—沙河滩>莲花宝殿;土壤硬度增加率分别为:保护区管理局为30.34%,紫霄宫为25.93%,唐坊滩—沙河滩为25.14%,莲花宝殿21.11%。且冲击样地的水分含量均低于对照样地,符合一般践踏对土壤造成干扰的规律。
     4)游客对4个节点环境改变不可接受程度排序为是:紫霄宫>保护区管理局>沙河滩保护站>莲花宝殿。另外植被冲击指数由大到小是:紫霄宫>保护区管理局>莲花宝殿—沙河滩>莲花宝殿,这两者相比较可知游憩活动对植被的冲击程度与游客对环境改变不可接受程度是一致的,且成正相关性。由此推论,游客对环境改变的感官认识最直接的判断是植被受干扰而引起的变化程度。
     5)游客滞留时间和活动范围是影响保护区生态环境的两个重要因素。通过调查分析发现,保护区内紫霄宫仅集中了登山游客量的48.1%,且但该调查点在4个调查节点(保护区管理局18.75 %;唐坊滩—沙河滩18.5 %;莲花宝殿18 %;紫霄宫24.55 %)中植被冲击指数最大,但受影响程度最大,说明游客在此滞留时间过长;而莲花宝殿上山路段的游客数量占到全部保护区游客量的80%以上,受影响程度反而最小。表明,此路段地形很大程度限制了游客游憩的范围。
     6)在游憩活动中,植被和土壤是受冲击的最主要对象,通过对其采取保护措施,可有效防范游憩活动对保护区内生态环境造成的冲击。莲花山自然保护区旅游开发过程中,大规模设施建设及一些信教群众的无序的宗教活动等方面的因素,都对保护区内部分景点和部分地段的生态环境产生较为明显的干扰,这些原因都直接或间接与游憩活动有关。
     7)针对保护区内生态环境质量存在的问题,提出如下的环境管理策略:第一,①游憩活动时空分异调控措施;第二,②植被冲击管理措施;第三,③土壤冲击管理措施;第四,④环境保护其他策略。
     7)通过游憩对植被的冲击进行调查评估,可以就发现的问题有针对性地采取措施。比如,控制旅游高峰期间游人数量、开发新的旅游景点分散客流、开展户外环境教育、加强对游客游憩活动的监控等措施,进而促进甘肃省莲花山国家级自然保护区可持续的、和谐的发展。
Taking Lianhua Mountain National Nature Reserve in Gansu Province as its object, with the analysis of facts as its method, this research is carried out with an attempt to study the impact of recreational activities on the vegetation and soil in the nature reserve, as well as visitors’psychology towards the environmental changes. This thesis mainly elaborates on the following three aspects: the impact of recreational activities on the vegetation and plant communities, the impact of recreational activities on the properties of soil, and visitors’acceptance of the environmental changes caused by recreational activities. Based on the above-mentioned aspects, the author of this thesis puts forward some strategies and measures which aim at strengthening the environmental protection of Lianhua Mountain Nature Reserve to realize the goal of sustainable development which will obtain both ecological and economic benefits. The results of the analysis are as follows:
     1) Recreational activities have brought about impact on the vegetation in some scenic spots and areas in the nature reserve. Visitors’tramping hasn’t caused severe impact on the environment, for they usually walk along the footpaths and in some comparatively spacious areas spots have been formed.
     2) The degree of the impact of human recreational activities on the plant communities in Lianhua Mountain National Nature Reserve is slight, and compared with the results of corresponding domestic researches, the impact exerted by the recreational activities in Lianhua Mountain National Nature Reserve is relatively minor, and the impact on the vegetation is within the limits of the bearable range of the environment in the nature reserve.
     3) Of the four sites of investigation, the recreational impact on the soil in order of severity is the Nature Reserve Administration >the Zixiao Palace > the Tangfang Beach-Shahe Beach>the Lianhua Palace. The degrees of soil hardness increment are as follows: 30.34 % in the Nature Reserve Administration, 25.93 % in the Zixiao Palace, 25.14 % in the Tangfang Beach-Shahe Beach, and 21.11 % in the Lianhua Palace. The moisture content in the sample plots which have been under impact is lower than that of the compared sample plots. This phenomenon is in accordance with the rules of the disturbance of the normal tramping on soil.
     4)Visitors’unacceptance of the environmental changes of the four sites of investigation in order of severity is the Zixiao Palace > the Nature Reserve Administration >Shahe Beach Protection Station>the Lianhua Palace. The index of the impact on the vegetation in order of severity is the Zixiao Palace > the Nature Reserve Administration > the Lianhua Palace-Shahe Beach>the Lianhua Palace. From this comparation, we can conclude that the degree of recreational impact on vegetation is in accordance with the degree of visitors’unacceptance of the environmental changes and these two have positive relevance. Based on this, we can draw the conclusion that visitors’sensational recognition of the environmental changes directly come form the changing degree of the disturbance upon vegetation.
     5) Visitors’stay time and activity sphere are the two main factors which influence the ecological environment in the nature reserve. The investigation and analysis show that only 48.1 % of the tourists have been to the Zixiao Palace, but it has been influenced most heavily. This indicates that visitors have stayed in this place for too long. More than 80 % of the visitors have been to the road up the mountains, but it has been influenced least heavily. This shows that the the terrain of this area has greatly limited visitors’activity sphere.
     6) Vegetation and soil are the main objects of the impact caused by recreational activities. Therefore, if measures can be taken to protect them, the impact caused by recreational activities on the ecological environment in the nature reserve can be effectively prevented. During the tourism development of Lianhua Mountain Nature Reserve, the massive construction of infrastructure and some disorderly religious activities carried out by local religious believers have disturbed the ecological environment in some scenic spots and certain areas in the nature reserve. All these causes are either directly or indirectly related to the recreational activities.
     7) Aiming at improving the ecological environment in Lianhua Mountain National Nature Reserve, this thesis proposes the following managerial strategies to protect the environment: first, the measures for the management of the time and space of the recreational activities ; second, the managerial measures for the impact on vegetation; third, the managerial measures for soil; fourth, the environmental protection and other strategies.
引文
[1]Hector Ceballos-Lascurain, Tourism, ecotourism, and protected areas[R]. IUCN-The World Conservation Union. 1996.4
    [2]邓金阳,陈德东.中国森林生态旅游资源的开发与保护[J].旅游经济,1996(4):15~18
    [3]赵黎明.旅游景区管理学[M].南开大学出版社.2002:5~7
    [4]李小梅,张江山,王菲凤.生态旅游项目的环境影响评价方法(EIA)与实践:以武夷山大峡谷森林生态旅游区为例[J].生态学杂志, 2005, 24(9): 1110~1114.
    [5]石强.旅游干扰对张家界国家森林公园土壤的影响研究[J].四川林业科技,2002,23(3):28~33
    [6]冯学钢,包浩生.旅游活动对风景区地被植物:土壤环境影响的初步研究[J].自然资源学报, 1999, 14(1): 76~78
    [7]李贞,保继刚,覃朝锋.旅游开发对丹霞山植被的影响研究[J].地理学报, 1998, 53(6): 554~561
    [8]石强,廖科,钟林生.旅游活动对植被的影响研究综述[J].浙江林学院学报, 2006, 23(2): 217~223
    [9]王宪礼,朴正吉,孙永平,等.长白山生物圈保护区旅游的环境影响研究[J].生态学杂志, 1999, 18(3): 46~55
    [10]Caroling K L,Catherine M.Impacts of tourism on threat-ened plant taxa and communities in Australia[J].Ecol Manage Restor,2003,4(1): 37~45
    [11]Cole D N.Research on soil and vegetation in wildness:a state-of-knowledge review[C]//LUCAS R C.(compiler)Proceedings-national Wildness Research Conference.Washington:USDA Forest Service Intermountain Research Station,1985:135~177
    [12]Settergren C.D&Cole D.M.Research effects on soil and vegetation in the Missouri Ouarks[J].Jour.of For,1970(69):231~233
    [13]Dale D&Weaver T.Tampling effects on vegetation of the trail corridors of North Rocky Mountain Forest[J].Journal of Applied Ecology.1974(11):767~772
    [14]Cole D N&Fichtler R K.Campsite impact in three western wilderness area[J].Environmental Management.1983(7):275~286
    [15]冯学钢,包浩生.旅游活动对风景区地被植物:土壤环境影响的初步研究[J].自然资源学报,1999,14(1):75~78
    [16]程占红,张金屯.生态旅游区不同距离带上植物群落的结构对比[J].应用与环境生物学报,2002,8(1):8~13
    [17]Kuss F.R.&Hall C.N Ground flora trampling studies five years after closuer[J]. Environment,1991, 15(5):715~727
    [18]Sun D.&M.J.LiddIe.A survey of trampling effects on vegetation and soil in eighttropical and subtropicalsites[J].Environmental Management,1993a,17(4):567~571
    [19]LIDDLE M J,GRIEG-SMITII P.A survey of tracks and paths in a sand dune ecosystem(I) soils, (Ⅱ)vegetation[J].Appl Ecol,1975,12(8):251~255
    [20]Kuss F.R.&Graefe A.R.Effects of recreation trampling on natural area vegetation[J].Journal ofLeisure Research,1985,17(3):165~183
    [21]Sun D.&M.J.LiddIe.Plant Morphological characteristics and Resistance to simulated trampling[J].Environmental Management,1993b,17(4):497~510
    [22]殷红梅.贵州织金洞客流时空分布规律与旅游者行为特征[J].地理学与国土研究,1999,15(2):71~74
    [23]刘晓冰,保继刚.旅游开发的环境影响研究进展[J].地理研究,1996,15(4):92~100
    [24]Sun D,Walsh D.Review of studies on environmental impacts of recreation and tourism in Australia[J].Journal of Environmental Management,1998,53(4):323~338
    [25]TRIBE J,FONT X.Tour for:managing the environmental impacts of access and tourism in Europe's forests[J].Quarterly Journal of Forestry,2000,94(3):223~228
    [26]CAROLINE K L,CATHERINE M.Impacts of tourism on threatened plant taxa andCommunities in Australia[J].Ecol Manage Restor,2003,4(1):37~45
    [27]Machieson A,Wall G.Tourism:economic,physical and social impacts[M].Longman,1982
    [28]Wall G,Wright C.The Enviromental impact of outdoor recreation[J].University of Weater 1.00,1997
    [29]Dale D&Weaver T.Tampling effects on vegetation of the trail corridors of North Rocky Mountain Forest[J].Journal of Applied Ecology.1974(11):767~772
    [30]WRAVRR T,DALR D.Trampling effects of hikers,motorcycles and horses inmeadows and forests[J].Appl Ecol,1978,15(2):451~457
    [31]LONSDALE W M,LANE A M.Tourist vehicles as vectors of weed seeds in Kakadu National Park,Northern Australia[J].BiolConserv,1994,69(3):277~283
    [32]LASZLO N.Monitoring vegetation change caused by trampling:a study in the Cairngorms, Scotland[J].Bot,J Scot,2002,54(2):191~208
    [33]WITZTUM E R,STOW D A.Analysing direct impacts of recreation activity on coastal sage scrub habitat with very high resolution multi-spectral imagery[J]. Int, J Remote Sens, 2004,25(17):3477~3497
    [34]SONJA W,CHRISTIAN R,MARKUS F.Effects of ski piste preparation on alpine venetation[J].Appl Ecol,2005,42(2):301~317
    [35]Edward inskeep.Tourism planning:an intergrated and sustainable development approach[M]. New York:Van Nostr and Reinhold,1991
    [36]姜恕.草地生态研究方法[M].北京:农业出版社,1988.4
    [37]楚义芳.旅游的空间经济分析[M].西安:陕西人民出版社,1992:113~114
    [38]Boo.E.Planning for Ecotourism[J].Parks,1994,2(3):4~8
    [39]Goodwin N.In pursuit of Ecotourism[J].Biocliver Conser 1996,5(3):277~291
    [40]Stanky.R Lieber,Daniel R.Festnmiaier.Recreation Planning and Management[M].E&F.N Spon Led,London,1983
    [41]SCRINZI,G,FLORIS,A.featuring and modeling forest in Italy[J].Forestry(Oxford),2000.73(2):173~185
    [42]刘晓冰,保继刚.旅游开发的环境影响研究进展[J].地理研究,1996,15(4):92~100
    [43]蒋文举等.旅游对峨眉山生态环境的影响及保护对策[J].环境科学,1996,17(3):48~51
    [44]但新球.森林游憩对环境与景观生态系统的影响[J].中南林业调查规划,1996,(1):56~60
    [45]王宪礼,朴正吉,孙永平等.长白山生物圈保护区旅游的环境影响研究[J].生态学杂志,1999,18(3):46~55
    [46]石强.旅游开发利用对张家界国家森林公园自然生态环境的影响及对策研究[D].北京林业大学学位论文,2000
    [47]项卫东,薛建辉.旅游干扰对森林景观与环境的影响,南京林业大学学报[J].2000,24(增刊):87~90
    [48]罗艳菊.野外旅游活动对生态环境的影响及对策之探讨[J].琼州大报,2001,8(3):87~90
    [49]蔡碧凡.森林游憩的生态冲击及对策探讨[J].福建林业科技,2005,32(1):120~12
    [50]黄顺洪,朱创业.卧龙自然保护区旅游开发对生态环境的影响及其保护[J].西南民族大学学报,2004,25(7):140~142
    [51]刘丽丽.北京灵山地区旅游开发对环境的影响研究[J].首都师范大学学报,2005,26(2):95~100
    [52]刘春艳,李文军,叶文虎.自然保护区旅游的非污染生态影响评价[J].中国环境科学,2001,21(5)399~403
    [53]李小梅,张江山,王菲凤.生态旅游项目的环境影响评价方法(EIA)与实践:以武夷山大峡谷森林生态旅游区为例[J].生态学杂志,2005,24(9):1110~1114
    [54]石强,李科林,廖科.景区环境影响评价[M].北京:化学工业出版社,2005
    [55]王资荣,郝小波.张家界国家森林公园环境质量变化及对策研究[J].中国环境科学,1988,8(4):23~30
    [56]黄艺,吴楚材等.张家界国家森林公园环境质量评价.载于:张家界国家森林公园课题组.张家界国家森林公园研究[M].北京:中国林业出版社,1991
    [57]兰思仁.国家森林公园理论与实践[M].北京:中国林业出版社,2004
    [58]洪剑明,冉东亚.生态旅游规划设计[M].北京:中国林业出版社,2006
    [59]蒋高明,黄银晓.旅游和城市化对避暑山庄土壤、植物的影响[J].环境科学,1990,11(1):35~39
    [60]李贞,保继刚,覃朝锋.旅游开发对丹霞山植被的影响研究.地理学报[J].1998,53(6):554~561
    [61]宋秀杰等.松山自然保护区旅游开发的环境影响研究[J].环境科学,1997(5):57~59
    [62]刘鸿雁,崔海亭,张金海等.旅游开发对东灵山亚高山草甸的影响[J].生物学杂志,1998,17(3):63~66
    [63]刘荣坤,胡艳,李永政.沈阳陨石山森林公园SO2污染现状与植物反应的研究[J].生态学杂志.1998,17(2):26~31
    [64]管东生,林卫强,陈玉娟.旅游干扰对白云山土壤和植被的影响[J].环境科学,1999(6):6~9
    [65]王素萍,高海勇,于子同.环境质量对旅游业发展变化的影响分析[J].环境保护,1999(1):21~22
    [66]王宪礼,朴正吉,孙永平等.长白山生物圈保护区旅游的环境影响研究[J].生态学杂志,1999,18(3):46~55
    [67]刘鸿雁,张金海.旅游干扰对香山黄栌林的影响研究[J].植物生态学报,1997,21(2):191~196
    [68]邓金阳,吴楚材,全龙.张家界国家森林公园游憩冲击的调查评估[J].中南林学院学报,2000,20(1):40~42
    [69]朱桂才.游憩对武当山土壤和植被的影响及承载力研究[D].华中农业大学学位论文,2001
    [70]程占红,张金屯.芦芽山自然保护区旅游开发与植被环境关系:旅游影响系数及指标分析[J].生态学报,2003,23(4):703~711
    [71]王忠君,蔡君,张启翔.旅游活动对云蒙山国家森林公园土壤影响的初步研究[J].河北林业科技,2003(5):12~16
    [72]何兴兵.游憩活动对缙云山土壤和植被的冲击及其管理策略的研究[D].西南师范大学学位论文,2004
    [73]李征,刘登义等.旅游开发对芜湖市森林公园植被与环境质量的影响[J].生物学杂志,2005,22(3):33~36
    [74]赵红红.苏州旅游环境容量问题初探[J].城市规划,1983(3):46~53
    [75]汪嘉熙.苏州园林风景旅游价值及其环境保护对策研究[J].环境科学,1986,7(4):83~88
    [76]陆林.山岳风景区客流研究:以安徽黄山为例[J].地理学报,1994,49(3):238~245
    [77]刘振礼,金键.特定区域内旅游环境的研究.旅游学刊[J].1985(2):13~18
    [78]保继刚.颐和园旅游环境容量研究.中国环境科学[J].1987,7(2):32~38
    [79]胡炳清.旅游环境容量计算方法.环境科学研究[J].1995,(3):20~24
    [80]楚义芳.旅游的空间组织研究[D].南开大学学位论文,1989
    [81]崔风军,刘家明.旅游承载力指数及其应用研究.旅游学刊[J].1998(3):41~44
    [82]崔凤军,杨永慎.泰山旅游环境承载力及其时空分异特征与利用强度研究[J].地理研究,1997,16(4):47~53
    [83]俞孔坚.生物保护的景观生态安全格局[J].生态学报,1999,19(1):8~15
    [84]杨锐.风景环境容量初探:建立风景区环境客量概念体系[J].城市规划汇刊,1996,32(60):12~15
    [85]杨兆萍,焦黎.喀纳斯自然保护区生态旅游研究[J].干旱区地理,1999,22(3):43~49
    [86]舒晶.旅游承载力及测度[J].北京第二外国语学院学报,2001(3):14~18
    [87]孙道玮,俞穆清,陈田等.生态旅游环境承载力研究:以净月潭国家森林公园为例[J].东北师大学报自然科学版,2002,34(1):66~71
    [88]刘滨谊,余露.风景旅游承载力评价研究与应用[J].规划师,2003,19(10):99~104
    [89]李庆龙.生态旅游承载力问题的探讨[J].林业经济问题,2004,24(3):170~172
    [90]孙悦华,方昀,Siegfried Klaus等.莲花山自然生态[M].辽宁:辽宁科学技术出版社, 2008:14~15