不同进针点骶髂螺钉对骨盆外旋不稳定的生物力学影响
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
1.背景
     随着高能量损伤的迅速增加,骨盆骨折的发病率逐年提高;由于近年来复苏技术、介入治疗等广泛开展,骨盆骨折的死亡率已下降至5-20%,大多数骨盆骨折患者得以生存,从而进入骨盆骨折的治疗阶段。在骨盆骨折治疗概念不断更新中,骨盆诸韧带生物力学作用的研究逐渐引起国内外专家的关注;我们对临床上较为多见的骨盆外旋不稳定(骨盆翻书样损伤)中骶髂关节前方韧带的生物力学作用进行研究,以明确骶髂螺钉在不同方向置钉的情况下对骨盆外旋不稳定的生物力学影响,为骨盆骨折的临床治疗提供依据。
     2.目的
     观测和测量不同进针点骶髂螺钉置钉对骨盆外旋不稳定的生物力学影响,以期为临床应用提供实验依据。
     3.材料与方法
     3.1一般资料
     10具新鲜冷冻保存的正常成人骨盆标本由浙江大学医学院解剖教研室提供,排除明显骨盆畸形、骨折和肿瘤等病变,对骨盆周围肌肉仔细剔除,完整保留骶髂前后韧带、骶髂间韧带、骶棘韧带、骶结节韧带,切断耻骨联合。线性测量采用精确度为0.01mm的位移电子引伸计,拉力测量采用德国Zwick/010电子万能材料试验机。
     3.2进针方法:
     分别于髂骨外板A、B、C点作为不同方向的进针点。其中B点进针法即为髂后下棘前2.5cm与坐骨大切迹上4.0cm的交点、与髂骨板呈向下向后各5°-10°的我们研究的进针法定位点,A点为B点同一水平面前方1.0cm、与髂骨板呈头倾5-10°和腹倾55-60°的定位点,C点为B点同一水平面后方1.0cm、与髂骨板呈头倾5°-10°和腹倾40°-45°的定位点。
     3.3加载方式:
     将标本放在特制的骨盆标本夹具上,在耻骨结节处垂直于耻骨联合方向施加2mm/min加速度的外旋力,外旋力的方向与标本的髂前上棘连线基本平行,电子万能材料试验机提供的力的大小同步反应在计算机上。
     3.4耻骨联合分离测量方法:
     将标本放在特制的骨盆标本夹具上,距耻骨联合切断面上方外缘各1.0cm均钉入一枚3.5mm螺钉,用以固定位移电子引伸计,螺钉与骨面垂直,两钉连线与标本的髂前上棘连线平行,于加载前后用位移电子引伸计精确测量耻骨联合分离的距离。测量力的数值由专人负责读数,每次测量前均给予适当力予加载-卸载三次,以消除标本的粘弹性影响。
     3.5骶髂关节裂缝移位测量方法:
     在同侧第一骶前孔连线水平、骶髂关节前缘两侧各钉入一3.5mm螺钉以固定位移电子引伸计,螺钉与骨面垂直,两钉连线与骶髂关节面垂直,相距约2.0cm,于加载前后用位移电子引伸计精确测量骶髂关节裂缝移位的距离,测量的数值由专人负责读数。
     3.6统计学处理
     采用SPSS13.0统计软件包计进行统计分析,数据均以均数±标准差行(X±S)表示,左右侧之间比较采用配对t检验,a值取0.05,P<0.05认为差异具有显著性。
     4.结果
     形态解剖学测量及生物力学测定结果左右侧别比较(配对t检验),统计分析显示差异无显著性(P>0.05)。故在进一步分析中将左右侧别之间的数据按测量方法并在一起处理。
     4.1耻骨联合分离测量结果
     (1)本实验在一定向外分离速度下(2mm/min)的作用下,力-耻骨联合间距位移回归曲线均呈类似直线关系。
     (2)在相同的向外分离速度下(2mm/min)不同的比较组间最大抗外旋力大小不一致,以韧带完整组最大(F0=260N±40N),其次为A点进针组(F1=180N±30N)和B点进针组(F2=160±30N),最差为C点进针组(F3=50N±10N)。
     (3)为了便于数据的可比性和统计分析,各组均在最大外旋力为120N下进行位移与抗外旋力的统计分析,韧带组、C进针点组与A/B组均存在显著性差异(P<0.05);A、B进针点组之间没有显著性差异(P>0.05)。
     4.2骶髂关节裂缝移位测量结果
     ①耻骨联合的分离与骶髂关节裂缝的移位呈线性相关,在耻骨联合轻度分离时(<0.5cm±0.1cm)骶髂关节出现关节不稳定;在耻骨联合分离达3.5cm±0.5cm时骶髂关节前方关节囊及韧带断裂。
     ②为了便于数据的处理,各组均在最大外旋力为120N下进行对抗骶髂关节裂缝移位和骶髂关节稳定性的统计分析,韧带组/B进针点组、A进针点组与C进针点组均存在显著性差异(P<0.05);韧带组、B进针点组之间没有显著性差异(P>0.05)。
     5.结论
     (1)经S1椎弓根水平骶髂关节螺钉固定的不同方向进针点中,A点和B点进针点对外旋不稳定有良好的对抗作用,C点进针点对外旋不稳定几乎没有对抗作用。
     (2)A点和B点进针法在对抗外旋力方面没有显著性差异,但对骶髂关节稳定性B进针点组更为优越。结合应用解剖特点,我们认为B点更为安全,为最佳进针点。
1. Background
    With the increase of high-energy injuries, incidence of pelvic fracture increased year by year. The death rate of the pelvic fracture had descended to 5%-20%, due to the widespread carry-out of resuscitation technique and interventional therapy, most sufferer can exist, we had got into the stage of surgical treatment of the pelvic fracture. With the development of the treatment concept of the pelvic fracture, mote and more domestic and international expert payed attention to the biomechamcal function of anterior sacroiliac ligament; we studied the biomechamcal function of this ligament in pelvic extorsion instability (pelvic "open book" injury) which usually happened in clinic, in order to identify the biomechamcal effect of sacroiliac screw with different needling point and found experiment evidence for the clinical treatment of pelvic fracture.
    2. Objective
    Observe and measure the biomechamcal effect of pelvic extorsion instability with different needleing-point of sacroiliac screw fixation, in order to found evidence for clinical application.
    3. Material and method 3.1 General data
    10 specimens of fresh refrigerant adult pelvic were supplied by Anatomy Department of Medical College of Zhejiang University. Pelvic deformity, fracture
    and tumor were excluded. We got rid of the muscles surrounding pelvic carefully, anterior and posterior sacroiliac ligaments、inter-sacroiliac ligament、 sacrospinale ligament and sacrosciatic ligament were reserved completely. Accurate rating of 0.01mm displacement electronic explication machine was used to measure the distance and German Zwick/010 electronic almighty material test machine was used to measure the tensile force.
    3.2 Needling method
    We drilled on different point(A, B and C) at the external circumferential lamella of iliac bone respectively. The point B was at 2.5cm anterior of posterior inferior iliac spine and 4.0cm upper of greater sciatic notch ,with 5°-10°headtilt and abdomentilt of iliac bone respectively, which we had studied before.The point A was at 1.0 cm anterior of the horizontal plane for the point B, with 5-10°headtilt and 55°-60°abdomentilt of flank bone. The point C was at 1.0 cm posterior of the horizontal plane for the point B, with 5°-10°headtilt and 40°-45°abdomentilt of flank bone.
    33 Loading way
    Put the specimen onto special pelvic fixation device, extorsion force of 2 mm/min acceleration was added in the direction of pubic tubercle perpendicular to pubic symphysis, the direction of the extorsion force was in parallel with the line of spina iliaca anterior superior of the specimen. The tensile force provided by electronic almighty material test machine was imported to the computer.
    3.4 Measure method of pubic symphysis diastasis
    Put the specimen onto special pelvic fixation device, insert a 3.5mm screw 1.0cm above the pubic symphysis section both sides, in order to fix the displacement electronic explication machine. The nails were vertical to the iliac bone , the line of two nails was in parallel with the line of spina iliaca anterior superior. The explication machine was used to measure the distance of diastasis of the symphysis pubis. Special researchers were responsible to read the number of the force. Gave appropriate force to load-unload three times before each measurement to eliminate the effect of viscoelastic properties.
    3.5 Measure the shifting of sacroiliac joint crack
    Inserted a 3.5mm screw each side of anterior sacroiliac joint on the line of right first anterior sacral foramina, then the specimen was fixed to the electronic explication machine. Nail was vertical to facies ossea, the line of two nails was vertical to iliosacral articulation surface and aparted from 2.0cm between two nails. Measured the distance precisely with electronic explication machine before and after the force was loaded. Special researchers was responsible to read the number of the force.
    3.6 Statistical treatment
    SPSS13.0 was used to preform statistical analysis, all the data was written as mean ± standardized deviate(x ± s),use t test to compare the two sides. a=0.05,the difference was statisticly significant if p<0.05.
    4. Results
    4.1 Results of pubic symphysis diastasis measurement
    (1)Under certain loading in this experiment, the curve of force-pubic symphysis distance was similar to straight line at a abruption speed of 2mm/min.
    (2) At the speed of 2mm/min,the maximum force of extorsion was diverse in different groups. The group of integrity ligament was biggest(F0=280N±40N),and then the group of needling point A(F1=180N±30N),the group of needling point B(F2=160N±30N),and the group of needling point C(F3=120N± 10N).
    (3) To be easy to preform statistical analysis, all the group of bias-extorsion force statistic were at a maximum speed of 120N. The difference between integrity ligament-needling point C group and needling point A/B group was statisticly significant; the difference between needling point A and B was not statisticly significant.
    4.2 Results of iliosacral articulation crack shifting measurement
    (1) The shifting between iliosacral articulation crack and pubic symphysis was linear correlation. When symphysis pubis dislocated gently(<0.5cm ± 0.1cm),
    sacroiliac articulation becomed unstable; if the distance ≥3.5cm ± 0.5cm, the anterior articular capsule and ligament of iliosacral articulation would collapse. (2) Each group was statistical analysised at 120N extorsion in opposition of iliosacral articulation shifting and stability of iliosacral articulation. The group of integrity ligament with the group B, the group A with the group B was significantly different (P<0. 05) , but the group of integrity ligament with the group C not (P >0.05) .
    5. Conclusion
    (1)With different needling point screw fixation of iliosacral articulation in the level of S1 lateral mass of vertebrar, The antagonism of extorsion instability was favourable with needling point A and B. The needling point C mostly didn't provide antagonism of extorsion instablility.
    (2)The difference of confronting extorsion force between needling point A and B was not statisticly significant, but the point B was better in stability of iliosacral articulation. We presume needling point B was the best and safest point because of the anatomy feature of the pelvis.
引文
[1] Ragnarsson B, jacobsson B. Epidemiology of pelvicf ractures in a Swedish county. Acta Orthop Scand, 1992, 63(3): 297-330.
    [2] Mucha P, Famell M. Analysis of pelvic fracture management. Trauma, 1984, 24(5): 379-386.
    [3] 蔡郑东.骨盆外科学.第一版.江苏:江苏科学技术出版社,1999.52.
    [4] Shaw JA. Mino DE. Wemer FW, et al. Posterior stabilization of pelvic fractures by use of threaded compression rods, Clin Orthop, 1985, 192: 240~254.
    [5] Tile M. Pelvic ring fractures: Should they be fixed? J Bone Joint Surg,1988, 70(B): 1~12
    [6] Semba RT, Yasukawa K, Gustilo BB. Critical andysis of results of 53 Malgaigne fractures of the pelvis. J Trauma, 1983, 23: 535~537.
    [7] B H Ziran, W R Smith, J Towers, S J Morgan. Iliosacral screw fixation of the posterior pelvic ring using local anaesthesia and computerised tomography. J Bone Joint Surg(Br); 2003, 85-B: 411-418.
    [8] Hinsche AF, Giannoudis PV,Smith RM.Fluoroscopy-based multiplanar image guidance for insertion of sacroiliac screws. Clin Orthop, 2002, 395: 135.
    [9] 郭世绂 主编.临床骨科解剖学.第1版.天津:天津科学技术出版社,1997:310~311.
    [10] Dommisse GF: Diametric fractures of the pelvis. J Bone Joint Surg, 1960, 42(B): 432~443.
    [11] Weisl H: The articular surfaces of the sacroiliac joint and their relation to the movements of the sacrum. Acta Anat, 1954, 22: 1~14.
    [12] 王亦璁,孟继懋,郭子恒主编.骨与关节损伤.第二版.北京:人民卫生出版社,192:545~547.
    [13] Simonian PT, Routt ML Jr, Harrington RM, et al. Anterior versus posterior provisional fixation in the unstable pelvis. A biomechanical com-parison. Clin Orthop, 1995, 26(1): 245-251.
    [14] ile M. Pelvic ring fractures: Should they be fixed? J Bone Joint Surg, 1988, 70(B): 1~12.
    [15] Brugess AR, Eastridge BJ, Young JWR, et al. Pelvic ring disruptions: effective classification system and-treatment protocols. J Trauma, 1990, 30(7): 848~851.
    [16] 周东生.骨盆创伤学,山东科技出版社,2003,63.
    [17] Sehildhauer TA, Josten Ch, MuhrG. Triangular osteosynthesis of vertically unstable sacrum fractures: a new concept allowing early weight-beating. J Orthop Trauma, 1998, 12(5): 307-314.
    [18] Shaw JA, Mino DE, Wemer FW, et al. Posterior stabilization of pelvic fractures by use of thereaded compression rods: cases reports and mechanical testing. Clin Or thop, 1985, 192: 240~254.
    [19] Simpon LA, Waddell JP, Leighton RK. Anterior approuch and stabilization of the disrupted sacroiliac joint. J Trauma, 1987, 27(12): 1332-1339.
    [20] Simonian PT, Rout ML Jr. biomechanics of pelvic fixation[J]. Orthop Clin North Am, 1997, 28(3): 351~367.
    [21] Ward EF, Tomasin J, Vander Griend RA. Open reduction and inter-nal fixation of vertical shear pelvic fractures. J Trauma, 1987, 27(3): 291.
    [22] Garcia JM, Doblare M, Seradl B, Seral F, et al. Three-dimentional finite element analysis of several internal and external pelvic fixations. J Biomech Eng, 2000, 122: 516.
    [23] Simonian PT, Routt ML Jr. Biomechanics of pelvic fixation. Orthop Clin North Am, 1997, 28 (3): 351.
    [24] Ebraheim NA, Biyani A. Percutaneous computed tomographic stabi-lization of the pathologic sacroiliac joint. Clin Orthop, 2003, 408: 252.
    [25] Goel VK, Winterbottom JW, Schulte KR, et al. Ligamentous Laxity across C0-C1-C2 complex: Axial Torque-rotation characteristics untilfailure. Spine, 1993, 15(10): 990~997.
    [26] Hefzy MS, Ebraheimn, Mekhail A, et al. Kinematics of the human pelvis following open book injury. Med Eng
    [27] Burgess AR: effective classification system and treatment, Eastridge B J, Young JWR, et al. Pelvic ring disruptions protocols. J Trauma, 1990, 30(7): 848~851
    [28] Simonian PT, Chip Routt ML. Biomechanics of pelvic fixation. Orthopedic Clinics of North America, 1997, 28(3): 352~353
    [1] Matta JM, Saucedo T. Internal fixation of pelvic ring fractures[J]. ClinOrthop, 1989, 242: 83~97.
    [2] B H Ziran, W R Smith, J Towers, S J Morgan. Iliosacral screw fixation of the posterior pelvic ring usinglocal anaesthesia and computerised tomography. J Bone Joint Surg(Br); 2003, 85-B: 411-418.
    [3] Berton R Moed, B K Ahrnad, Joseph G Craig, et al. Intraoperative monitoring with stimulus-evoked electromyography during placement of Iliosacral Screws. J Bone Joint Surg(Br), 1998, 80(4): 537-546.
    [4] Hinsche AF, Giannoudis PV, Smith RM. Fluoroscopy-based multiplanar image guidance for insertion of sacroiliac screws. Clin Orthop, 2002, 395: 135.
    [5] 潘志军,洪华兴,黄宗坚,等.骶髂关节螺钉固定的钉道参数应用解剖学研究。中国临床解剖学杂志,2004,22(2):125-128.
    [6] Rose P, Goldberg BA, Lindsey RW, et al. Computed tomogrphy assessment of sa-croiliac screw placement relative to the first sacral neuroforamen. J Spinal Disord, 2001, 14(4): 30.
    [7] Routt MLC, Simonian PT, Agnew SG, et al. Radiographic Recognition of the Sacral Alar Slope for Optimal Placement of lliosacral Screws: A Cadaveric and Clinical Study. Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma, 1999, 10(3): 171.
    [8] Ziran BH, Smith WR, Towers J ,et al. Iliosacral screw fixation of the posterior pelvic ring using local anaesthesia and computerised tomography. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) , 2003 , 85 (3) :411.
    [9] H.E.Smith,et al.Surgical Technology:Computer-assisted fluoroscopic guidance improves percutaneous iliosacral screw placement.Medical Devices & Surgical Technology Week.2006,12:533.
    [10] Van den Bosch EW,Van Zwienen CM, Van Vugt AB.Fluoroscope positioning of sacroiliac screw in 88 patients.J Trauma,2002,53:44.
    [11] Yinger K, Scalise J , Olson SA , et al . Biomechanical comparison of posterior pelvic ring fixation. J Orthop Trauma , 2003, 17(7):481
    [12] C. M. A. van Zwienen, E. W. van den Bosch, C. J. Snijders, et al.Biomechanical Comparison of Sacroiliac Screw Techniques for Unstable Pelvic Ring Fractures.J Orthop Trauma,2004,18(9):589- 595
    [13] H. C. Sagi, N. R. Ordway, T. DiPasquale.Biomechanical Analysis of Fixation for Vertically Unstable Sacroiliac Dislocations With Iliosacral Screws and Symphyseal Plating. J Orthop Trauma ,2004,18:138-143
    [14] Blake-Toker AM,Hawkins L,Nadalo,et al. Ctguided percutaneousfixation of sacroiliac fracture in trauma patients. J trauma,2001,51:1117.
    [15] Garcia JM, Dobare M, Seradl B, Seral F, et al. Three-dimentional finite element analysis of several internal and external pelvic fixations. J Biomech Eng, 2000, 122: 516.
    [16] Xiao T, tang XQ, Liao LY. Elinial analysis of pelvic facture in 205 patients[J]. Zhongguo Xiandai Yixue Zazhi, 2002, 13(12): 40-42. Chinese.
    [17] Connor GS, McGwin G Jr, McLennan PA, et al. Early versus delayed fixation of pelvic ring fractures. Am Surg, 2003, 69: 1019-1024.
    [18] 杨开舜,马梦昆,劳汉昌.骶髂螺钉固定在骶髂关节脱位中的应用解剖学研究.中国矫形外科杂志,2004,12(11):848-850.
    [19] 李伟元,李洪恩.骶髂关节及相关的解剖观测和临床意义.解剖与临床,2004,9(2):71-73.
    [20] Zheng Y, Lu WW, Zhu Q, et al. Variation in bone mineral density of the sacrum in young adults and its significance for sacral fixation[J]. Spine, 2000, 25(3): 353-357.
    [21] Start AJ, Walter JC, Harris RW. Percutaneous screw fixation of fractures of the iliac wing and fracture-dislocations of the sacroiliac joint(OTA Types61-B2.2 and 61-B2.3, or Youngburgess & quot, lateral compression type Ⅱ & quot, pelvic fractures). J Orthop Trauma, 2002, 16: 116.
    [22] Keating J, Blachut P, O' Brian P, et al. Vertically unstable pelvicfractures the outcomes of iLiosacral screw fixation of the posterior lesion[C]. Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Orthopaedic Trauma Association, 1994.
    [23] Moore R,Webb L. Outmme in patients with unstable variety posterior pelvic ring injury[C]. Paper Presented at the 62nd An nual Meeting of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 1995.
    
    [24] P.S. Ko, S.K. Kou.Case report:A rare complication of percutaneous iliosacral screw in a vertically unstable pelvic disruption in a child Injury, Int. J. Care Injured 32 (2001): 159— 161.
    
    [25] Routt ML Jr , Simonian PT , Mills WJ . Iliosacral screw fixation :early complications of the percutaneous technique. J Orthop Trauma, 1997 ,11 (8): 584.