我国FDI溢出效应的区域差异分析
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
大量经济研究表明,国外直接投资(FDI)会对东道国的经济增长产生显著的推动促进作用,而FDI溢出效应则是推动经济发展的直接动力。经过了30多年的改革开放,中国经济得到了快速的飞跃,并且已经成为全世界最大的外资流入国之一。充分利用FDI溢出效应来促进经济又好又快地发展从而尽快达到共同富裕是我国引进国外直接投资的主要目的。自从改革开放以来,国外资本大量进入中国,推动了中国经济快速增长的同时,也加剧了我国国内区域经济发展的不平衡:我国长期以来主要是东部发达地区外资流入以及经济发展较高,而广大中、西部地区甚至东部的一些地区则相对落后。随着对外开放的不断深入扩大,中国与国际经济的联系日益密切,其差距也在逐渐缩小,因此FDI溢出效应与我国各地区经济发展的关系也发生着变化,如何实现经济的可持续快速发展成为当前经济界讨论的热点。那么,FDI在我国不同区域的溢出效应到底如何?我国影响FDI溢出效应的因素到底是什么,这些因素对FDI溢出效应影响程度到底如何?基于以上问题,本文对我国不同区域间FDI溢出效应的差异以及相关因素与FDI溢出效应之间的关系进行了实证分析研究。
     本文将理论和实证相结合,对FDI溢出效应在我国东、中、西部的差异以及我国相关因素对FDI溢出效应产生的影响进行了分析研究。本文首先从经济理论的角度阐述了FDI溢出效应的定义、其对东道国的作用原理以及影响FDI溢出效应的相关因素。然后,本文重点对我国FDI溢出效应的区域差异进行实证研究,分别从静态分析和动态分析两个角度对FDI溢出效应在我国东、中、西部地区的差异以及我国相关因素对FDI溢出效应的影响进行了实证检验。经过实证研究,本文得出下面的结论:国外直接投资能够通过正的FDI溢出效应促进我国各个区域的经济增长,这一点是无容置疑的;FDI溢出效应在我国东、中、西部地区存在较大差异,但是中部和西部地区同东部地区的差异正在逐渐缩小,我国FDI溢出效应已经出现了东部发达地区稳定发展,中西部地区快速发展的形势。另外,在对影响FDI溢出效应的相关因素中,我国经济发展水平、开放程度、基础设施建设规模、人力资源、市场竞争度、投资软环境以及技术差距等都影响着FDI溢出效应的作用。最后,本文提出进一步发展国外直接投资在我国溢出效应的相关建议:继续扩大开放,加快发展当地经济水平,重视科技文化发展尤其是人力资源的培养,加大基础设施建设的力度以及促进市场竞争度。
A large number of studies show that, foreign direct investment (FDI) canpromote the host country’s economy growth significantly, and the FDI spillover effectis the direct motive force to promote the economic. After30years of reform andopening up, China's economy has been developing rapidly, and has become theworld's largest foreign capital inflow area. The main purpose of our countryintroducing foreign direct investment is to make full use of spillover effects of FDI topromote economic development well and fast in order to achieve common prosperity.Since the reform and opening up, great numbers of FDI inflow to China, not onlypromoted the rapid growth of Chinese economy, but also aggravate our country'sunbalanced development of regional economy. The inflow of foreign capital andeconomic development is higher in the eastern developed areas for a very long time,while the majority of central and western region, even some of the eastern area arerelatively backward. With the continuous deepening of opening up, China'sconnection with international economy is increasingly close, the gap of economic isalso gradually reduced, so the relationship between spillover effect of FDI and China'sregional economic development have also changed. How to realize economicsustainable and rapid development of economy has become the key-point. So, what’sthe difference between the spillover effects of FDI in China’s different areas? Whichfactor can influence spillover effect of FDI, and how these factors influence thespillover effect of FDI? Based on the above issues, this article analysis China'sdifferent region’s spillover effect of FDI, and do research on the relationship betweenthese factors and the spillover effect of FDI.
     This paper adopts the method of combining theory with empirical to analysis thedifference of the spillover effects of FDI among the eastern、central、western areas inchina, and analysis how related factors influence the spillover effect of FDI? Thispaper first gives the definition to spillover effect of FDI, and how spillover effect ofFDI influence the host country, and do a theoretically elaborate about what factorsinfluence the spillover effect of FDI. Then, this paper focus more on the empiricalstudy on spillover effects of FDI’s regional differences, from the angle of staticanalysis and dynamic analysis to do empirical analysis on the difference of thespillover effects of FDI among the eastern、central、western areas in China, and howrelated factors influence the spillover effect of FDI. After the research, the paperdraws the following conclusion: it is no doubt that the FDI can pass through thepositive spillover effect to promote the growth of regional economy, there is adifference spillover effects of FDI in China among eastern、central、western areas, butthe gap is narrowing. Spillover effect of FDI in the eastern developed regions, have astable development. The center and west regions are in the situation of a rapiddevelopment. In addition, in the spillover effects of FDI’s relative factors, spillovereffect of FDI is affected by level of progress of our country economy, open degree,infrastructure construction scale, human resources, market competition, the softenvironment for investment and technology gap. Finally, this paper Give suggestionson the further development of spillover effect of FDI in our country: continue toexpand opening, accelerate the development level of local economy, pay attention to the cultural development of science and technology especially the cultivation ofhuman resources, increase the construction of infrastructure and promote thecompetition of the market.
引文
[1]中国行业研究网.2011年1—12月全国吸收外商直接投资情况简析[EB/OL].http://www.chinairn.com/news/20120224/481456.html
    [2]MacDougall. The Benefits and Costs of Private Investment from Abroad: A TheoreticalApproach[J]. Economic Record,1960:13-35.
    [3]Caves R.E. Multinational Firms, Competition and Productivity in Host-country Markets[J].Economic.1974:41.
    [4]Katz J.M. Production Functions, Foreign Investment and Growth[J]. Journal of InternationalEconomics.1969:33.
    [5]Aitken B. J. and Harrison A.E. Do domestic firms benefit from direct foreign investment?Evidence from Venezuela[J]. The American Economic Review vol.1999:89.
    [6]Globerman S. Foreign Direct Investment and ‘Spillover’ Efficiency Benefits in CanadianManufacturing Industries[J]. Canadian Journal of Economics.1979(12):42-56.
    [7]Blomstrom M. and Persson H. Foreign Direct Investment and Spillover Efficiency in anUnderdeveloped Economy: Evidence from the Mexican Manufacturing Industry[J]. WorldDevelopment.1983(11):493-501.
    [8]Kokko A. Tansini and M. Zejan. Productivity Spillovers from FDI in the UruguayanManufacturing Sector[J]. Journal of Development Studies.1996:32.
    [9]Flores, Renato G., Maria Paula Fontoura and Rogerio Guerra Santos. Foreign Direct InvestmentSpillovers: What Can We Learn from Portuguese Data?[J]. Universidade Teenica deLisboa.2000:12.
    [10]Sjoholm Fredrik. Technology Gap, Competition and Spillovers from Direct ForeignInvestment: Evidence from Establishment Data[J]. Journal of Development Studies.1999(36):53-73.
    [11]Dimelis S. and Louri H. Foreign Ownership and Production Efficiency: A QuantizeRegression Analysis[J]. Oxford Economic Papers.2002:8.
    [12]Cantwell J. Technological Innovation and MultinationalCorporations[C].Oxford:Blackwell.1989.
    [13]Haddad M. and A. Harrison. Are There Positive Spillovers from Direct Foreign Investment?Evidence from panel data for Morocco[J]. Journal of Development Economics.1993(42):51-74.
    [14]Aitken B. and A. Harrison. Do Domestic Firms Benefit from Foreign Direct Investment?Evidence from Venezuela[J]. American Economic Review.1999(89):605-618.
    [15]Barrios Salvador. Are There Positive Spillovers from Foreign Direct Investment? Evidencefrom the Spanish Experience(1990-1994)[C]. mimeo, University of Manchester.2000.
    [16] Kokko.A. Foreign Direct Investment, Host Country Characteristics and Spillovers [J]. TheEconomics Research Institute.1992.
    [17] Ariken and Harrison. How does Foreign Investment Affect Economic Growth?[J]. Journal ofInternational Economics.1991(45):115-135
    [18]Findlay. Relative Backwardness, Direct Foreign Investment and Transfer of Technology: ASimple Dynamic Model [J]. Quarterly Journal of Economics.1991(37):63—87.
    [19]Batiz R.&Batiz L. The Effects of Foreign Direct Investment in the Presence of IncreasingReturns Due to Specialization [J]. Journal of Development Economics.1991(34):287一307.
    [20]Kokko A. Technology, Market Characteristic, and Spillovers[J]. Journal of DevelopmentEconomics.1994(43):279-293.
    [21]Kokko A. Tansini and M. Zejan. Productivity Spillovers from FDI in the UruguayanManufacturing Sector[J]. Journal of Development Studies.1996:32
    [22]Imbriani C. and Reganati F. International Efficiency Spillovers into the Italian ManufacturingSector-English Summary [J]. Economia Internazionale.1997,50,583-595.
    [23] Liu, Xiaming,Pamela Siler,Chengqi Wang and Yingqi Wei. Productivity Spillovers fromForeign Direct Investment: Evidence from UK Industry Level Panel Dada[J]. Journal ofInternational Business Studies.2000,31,407-425
    [24]Wang J. and Blomstrom M. Foreign Investment and Technology Transfer, A Simple Model[J].European Economic Reviews.1992,36,137-155.
    [25]Lapan H. and Bardhan P. Localilsed Technical Progress and Transfer of Technology andEconomic Development[J]. Journal of Economic Theory.1973(6):585-595.
    [26]Perez T. Multinational Enterprises and Technological Spillovers: an Evolutionary Model[J].Evolutionary Economics.1997,7(2):169-192.
    [27]Blomstrom M. and Wolf E. Multinational Corporations and Productivity Convergence inMexico[M]. Convergence of Productivity: Cross rational Studies and Historical Evidence.1994.
    [28]Balasubramanyam V.N. The MAI and Foreign Direct Investment in Developing Countries[C].Discussion Paper EC10/98Lancaster University.1998.
    [29]Nigel D. and James H. Dose The Motivation for Foreign Direct Investment AffectProductivity Spillovers to The Domestic Sector?[J]. University of Birmingham ResearchPaper.2002.
    [30]刘金钵,朱晓明.跨国直接投资技术溢出效应实证研究[J].世界经济研究.2004(8)
    [31]姜磊,高云超. FDI的技术溢出效应与经济增长[J].生产力研究.2004(8).
    [32]严兵.外商在华直接投资的溢出效应[J].世界经济研究.2005,(3)
    [33]张雪倩.跨国公司在中国的技术溢出效应分析:以汽车工业为例[J].世界经济研究.2003.4
    [34]李广众,任佳慧.论我国外商直接投资的技术溢出效应[J].国际贸易问题.2005.4
    [35]俞春娇,郭晓兰.外商对华直接投资的技术外溢效果——基于产业联系角度的分析[J].湖北经济学院学报.2004.4
    [36]范飞龙.跨国公司投资对中国经济的溢出效应—上海市的实证研究[J].财贸经济.2005.4
    [37]李建伟,冼国明.后向关联途径的外商直接投资溢出效应分析[J].国际贸易问题.2010.4
    [38]刘专恩.外商直接投资的出口效应分析[J].当代经济科学.1999(02).
    [39]梁志成.论国际贸易与国际直接投资的新型关系——对芒德尔贸易与投资者替代模型的重新思考[J].经济评论.2001(02).
    [40]黄河.国际贸易理论与国际直接投资理论在比较优势下的融合[J].首都经济贸易大学学报.2002(4):02.
    [41]冼国明,严兵.FDI对中国创新能力的溢出效应[J].世界经济.2005.10.
    [42]叶灵莉,王志江FDI溢出效应与我国经济制度关系的实证分析[J].科技进步与对策.2009.6
    [43]王洪亮,徐霞.日本对华贸易与直接投资的关系研究[J].世界经济.2003(08).
    [44]石峰. FDI在中国经济发展中的利弊分析与思考[J].北京工商大学学报.2006(03).
    [45]陈涛涛,陈娇.行业增长因素与我国行业内溢出效应[J].经济研究.2006(06).
    [46]赖明勇,包群.外商直接投资与技术外溢:基于吸收能力的研究[J].经济研究.2005(08).
    [47]严兵.外商在华直接投资的溢出效应[J].世界经济研究.2005(3)
    [48]李汉君.我国FDI流入的地区差异与影响因素分析——基于1992-2007年省级面板数据[J].国际贸易问题.2011.3
    [49]黄先海,张云帆.我国外贸外资的技术溢出效应分析[J].国际贸易问题.2005(01)
    [50]周燕,齐中英.基于行业特征的外商直接投资溢出效应分析[J].中国软科学.2005(09).
    [51]张玉英,余升国.不同来源地FDI对中国国有工业部门的影响[J].江汉论坛.2005.8
    [52]张光维.我国利用外商直接投资溢出效应的地区差异[J].开放导报.2008(04)
    [53]涂涛涛.外商直接投资对中国工业部门的外溢效应分析——基于分位数回归法[J].世界经济研究.2008(08)
    [54]汪旭辉,杨东星.我国流通服务业FDI溢出效应及其影响因素——基于省级面板数据的实证检验[J].宏观经济研究.2011(06)
    [55]姜玉梅,王数.外商直接投资溢出效应的研究[J].外资与经贸.2010.15.
    [56]Griliches S. Issues in Assessing the Contribution of R&D to Productivity Growth[J].BellJournal of Economics.1979(10):92-116
    [57]Caves.R.E.,1974. Multinational Firms, Competition and Productivity in Host-countryMarkets [J].Economica41,176-19
    [58]刘和东,施建军.中国外商直接投资溢出效应区域比较[J].亚太经济.2009(2)
    [59]王悦.外商直接投资的溢出效应分析[J].价格理论与实践.2003(11).