摘要
1955年，英国人类学家马克斯·格卢克曼在他的首部法律民族志——《北罗得西亚巴罗策人的司法程序》中，试图证明非洲本土的巴罗策习惯法同西方法律相比共性大于差异。两年之后，美国人类学家保罗·博安南提出相反观点，在他所出版的《提夫人的正义与审判》中认为，尼日利亚提夫人的“法律”与英美法相比存在着较大差异。为此他区分“民俗体系”与“分析体系”：西方法学固然发达，但它仍然是一种“民俗体系”，如果无视这一点，而把它当作“分析体系”来运用，势必导致对研究对象的曲解，从而陷入我族中心主义，将矛头直指格卢克曼。从而引发了此后两人长达30多年的学术争论。这就是英美法律人类学史上著名的格博之争。
除了双方性格上的原因之外，如此漫长的争论似乎只有一种解释：无解。非洲本土法与西方法究竟共性大于差异，还是差异大于共性？能否以及怎样使用西方法律范畴来描述和分析非西方的法律制度？人类学是否有必要使用法学的研究方法？……格卢克曼和博安南曾经明确争论过或涉及到的这些问题，正是英美法律人类学一个世纪以来不断面对、至今仍未解决的困境之所在。
全文共分四章，其中，前三章是按照事件的发生顺序对争论起因、经过、结束整个过程的梳理，第四章则是对争论分歧的剖析和总结。具体安排如下：
第一章对争论发生的必然条件和偶然因素进行了详尽的考察。19世纪世界头号殖民家塞西尔·罗兹不仅为格卢克曼和博安南提供了田野调查的研究场地，还资助他们进入了英国人类学主流的学术圈；20世纪上半叶最具效率殖民策略的发明家弗雷德里克·卢格德则为他们进入田野提供了直接的动因，甚至为他们的研究提供了意义。除了马林诺夫斯基曾略微涉及过此问题之外，该领域之前并没有过类似的争论。但是1950年代的知识背景发生了新的变化：英美人类学启动人文科学转向，美国人类学文化相对论日趋完善，文化普遍主义改头换面，结构语言学正在对人类学发生影响。
受美国文化相对论思潮的影响以及在第二语言习得方面上的天赋，博安南发动了这场争论，而他之所以选择格卢克曼作为批评对象，是因为后者的著作是该领域第一部以直接观察的案例材料为基础写就的法律民族志。作为一位出生于南非的俄裔犹太人，生活和仕途上的遭遇使得格卢克曼成为了一名激进的种族平等主义者，家庭的影响也给他带来了浓厚的法学情结，所以格卢克曼会以普遍主义的视角采用西方法学范畴。但受到批评多少有些冤枉，博安南的质疑也略显仓促。以上条件和因素共同决定了1950年代在英美法律人类学中出现了格卢克曼与博安南的争论。
第二章按照文献的出版时间，力图中立客观地对格卢克曼和博安南所发表的与争论有关的论著进行了系统的梳理和解读，并按照内容及其相关度划分为四个阶段。首先是各自出版的法律民族志。由于未曾想到事后会遭到批评，所以《巴罗策人的司法程序》是格卢克曼理论和方法的“原生态”呈现。而《提夫人的正义与审判》也体现了博安南田野调查时期的学术理想。接下来这场争论真正拉开了序幕，从1959年到1968年的十年间，双方共发表了包括著作、论文、书评在内的12部/篇文献，且都是针对争论专门而作的著述。
奥地利法律人类学会议的召开标志着这场笔墨官司的全面升级：两人同时与会进行了唇枪舌剑的当面论辩，使这场争论成为了英美法律人类学的焦点。不过由于论文提交与最终出版长达三年的间隔，被英美学者反复引用的此次会议的论文并不能反映出格博之争的全部。所以双方也无意停战。格卢克曼在两部著作的再版序言中对争论进行了反思，可惜两年之后撒手人寰，争论也就变成博安南一个人的独角戏。1989年博安南最后一次提及这场争论，标志着争论的彻底结束。通过对格博之争所涉文献的全面展示，本文认为，格博之争应该是关于西方法律与前工业社会法律共性与差异的分歧，西方法律范畴能否以及怎样研究前工业社会法律的争论。
第三章探讨争论为什么结束，所以首先对争论结束的时间和标志进行了界定。1970年代以后，关注法律与社会之关系的过程研究已经成为了美国法律人类学的主要特点，这也标志着美国已经超越英国成为英语世界法律人类学的主导。而格卢克曼和博安南也受到了这种转向的影响。虽然在这一时期，他们的争论仍在继续，但已经不为学界所关注，这也意味着格博之争在学科意义上的结束。但争论的分歧并没有得到解决，胜负无法判断，双方陷入僵局。但是，格卢克曼和博安南通过他们的争论证明了英美法律人类学无法解决西方法律的自我表述问题，从而直接促成了该领域的研究由规则中心范式向过程主义范式的转移。
汉语文献中经常可见所谓“法学家派”和“非法学家派”的说法，认为格卢克曼是前者的典型代表，而相对的，博安南则是后一派的领军人物。可是笔者追根溯源，从最早使用这对汉语概念的林端教授，到借题发挥的德国学者乌韦·韦塞尔，再到四次划分谱系却从未使用过“学派”这一称谓的英国学者西蒙·罗伯茨，发现英美法律人类学领域并没有这两派的对立。相关学者在对该问题的处理上难称学派，“非法学家派”也并未逃脱西方法学的阴影。
在对格博之争从起因、经过到结束完整过程的系统梳理和全面展现之后，第四章对这场争论的分歧进行剖析，将其剥离为三重困境。首先呈现的是认识论困境，即怎样理解他者的法律。虽然格博之争处于法律人类学表征危机的萌芽阶段，但却体现了普遍和特殊的永恒难题。不过同宗教人类学所引发的合理性之争相比，格博之争在认识论上的反思不够自觉，因为双方的分歧集中表现于方法论困境，即怎样表达他者的法律。英美法律人类学在该问题上始终存在着主位和客位两种不同视角的截然对立，格博之争正是其典型体现。与经济人类学的实质与形式之争相比，虽然有着诸多相似之处，但是在研究规模、参与人数还是影响力上均体现了法律人类学的弱势地位。
交叉还是分支？格博之争典型体现了英美法律人类学的身份困境。格卢克曼试图沟通人类学和法学，认为使用法学方法就能够促成学科交叉。但这只是人类学家对法律的法学研究，是一种“人类学”的法学。由于没有专属的研究方法，不会得到法学的认同，因而学科不可能实现交叉。博安南强调人类学的特殊性，主张人类学的方法，呼吁人类学家对法律的人类学研究，这才是真正意义上的法律人类学。但是由于没有发现具有普遍解释力的方法，加之失去了研究对象，使得法律人类学逐渐边缘化。与荷兰的由法学家所创建和传承的法律人类学相比，二者可谓殊途同归：都没有实现学科的交叉。
在结论部分，文章援引萨特存在主义视角对“他者”问题的分析：正是由于他者意识的出现，自我意识才会显现。他者是自我的先决条件。换句换说，对他者的理解实际上直接揭开了人们对自我理解的角度和深度。笔者由此得出结论：只有本体论上的反思和困境才是格博之争真正有别于其他分支学科类似争论的特殊之处。这场争论通过对非西方法律的研究和讨论，实现了对西方自身法律的反思，打破了西方法律的高等性。虽然受到了法学的严重阻挠，但法律人类学为我们理解法律提供了另外一种视角。但是，人类学所面对的他者并不是“相对的他者”，而是列维纳斯所谓的“彻底的他者”或“绝对的他者”。其特点是他者绝不能还原为自我或同一。这是自我永远的本体论困境。而这也决定了与法学同出一门（西方知识体）的人类学不可能完成对西方法律的彻底反思。
1955, the British anthropologist Max Gluckman in his first legalethnography——The Judicial Process among the Barotse of Northern Rhodesia,deliberated his attempt in proving that similarities between Barotse customary law inlocal Africa and Western law prevailed when compared with their difference, Which,Two years later, was opposed by the American anthropologist Paul Bohannan in hisJustice and Judgment among the Tiv. He believed that differences reflected appears tobe far more than similarities between the Tiv law of Nigeria and Anglo-American law.Thus he distinguished between folk system and analytical system: Western law is verydeveloped, but it is still a folk system, if we ignore this and use it as analytical system,will inevitably lead to misinterpretation of the research,and thus fall intoethnocentrism. He directed the criticism towards Gluckman, which has given rise totheir debate for over30years since then. This is just called the famousGluckman-Bohannan debate in Anglo-American legal anthropology.
Apart from reasons arising from of the disposition of two sides, only oneexplanation is capable of accounting for such a long debate: no solution. There werestill issues having been explicitly debated by Gluckman and Bohannan Whethercommonality is superior to differences, or Vice Versa between African local law andWestern law? Whether and how to use the Western legal category to describe andanalyze non-Western legal systems? Whether methods applied by Law are entitled to the study of Anthropology?..., which are the embarrasments that Anglo-Americanlegal anthropology have been facing with no resolution sofar for a century.
This dissertation is divided into four chapters, of which the first three chaptersaims to introduce the entire process, in accordance with the order of events on thecauses，passage, and finality of the debate; fourth chapter focus on the analysis andsummary on controversy. Specific arrangements are as follows:
A detailed investigation of the inevitable and causal factors in the first chapter.Cecil Rhodes, the world's top colonial in the19th century, provided a research area forGluckman and Bohannan in order for fieldwork, but also helped them level up into themainstream academic circles of British anthropologist; in addition, Frederick Lugard,the inventor of the the most efficient colonial policy in the first half of20th century,granted a direct motivation, even the value for their research. Apart fromMalinowski’s slight involvment in this issue, this field had not previously haddispute as it used to be. However, new changes had taken place in the academia of1950s: Anglo-American legal anthropology switched itself to humanities, theory ofrelativity of American anthropology culture was gradually perfected, culturaluniversalism appeared with a totally brand new image, structural linguistics wasexerting the effects on anthropology.
Subjected to the influence of American cultural universalism, plus genious insecond language acquisition, Bohannan launched the debate. He targeted his criticismtowards Gluckman just because the literature by the latter was the first-published legalethnography based on observed cases in this field. Suffered from the his life andcareer, Gluckman, as a South African-born Russian jew, became a radical of racialequality with deep law complex brought by his family. Therefore, universalisticperspective tends to be brought by him to Western legal category. But it is injustice forhim to be criticized by Bohannan, and the latter’s challenge is also somewhat hasty.Above conditions and factors determinied the Gluckman-Bohannan debate occurredin the Anglo-American legal anthropology.
In accordance with the publication date of the document, Chapter II made aneutral and objective analysis and interpretation on the literature related to the Gluckman-Bohannan debate, and is divided into four stages in accordance with thecontent and its relevance. In the first stage-----their respectively published legalethnography, The Judicial Process among the Barotse manifested itself in originalform of Gluckman’s theories and methods as result of not forseeing the consequentdenouncement while Justice and Judgment among the Tiv reflected the academic idealof the Bohannan in the fieldwork period.as the consequence. The next stage just pullsup the curtain of such debate. From1959to1968, both sides published12literatures,including books, papers, book reviews, and those are designed for specializedpublications.
The conference of legal anthropology in Austria means the escalation of battle ofwords: they debated fiercely in person, which made this debate focus of theAnglo-American legal anthropology. However, due to a three-year interval betweenthe papers presented and that eventually published, the papers in the conferencerepeatedly referenced by Anglo-American scholars can not truly reflect what is allabout Gluckman-Bohannan debate. The two sides has no intention to cease thedisagreement after the conference. Gluckman made a reflection in the preface ofsecond edition his two classics. He, unfortunately, died two years later. Thus thisdebate became a drama in which Bohannan perform only by himself. In1989,Bohannan has mentioned the dispute for the last time, which indicated the end of thelast stage. Through a comprehensive display of the literature of theGluckman-Bohannan debate, this thesis argues that the dispute should involvecontroversy over similarities and differences between Western law and law ofre-industrial society, and argument on whether and how the Western legal categorycan analyze the law of re-industrial society.
The third chapter discussed the reasons of the end of the debate. It, in the fisrplace, define time and sign of the end of dispute. Since the1970s, the researchconcentrating on the relationship between the law and society has featured ofAmerican legal anthropology, which means that America has surpassed Britain andbecame the leader in legal anthropology in the English-speaking world. Gluckmanand Bohannan were also affected by this shift. In spite of the continuing of the debate during this period, it is no longer regarded as the focus in the academics, also meaningthe termination of Gluckman-Bohannan debate in the sense of discipline, while thedivarication in the debate has not been resolved. Neither was winner with an impassereached. Dramatically, Gluckman and Bohannan’s debate proved the inferiority ofAnglo-American legal anthropology on resolving the self-expression probles of theWestern law, thus directly contributing to the shift from the rule-centered paradigm tothe processual paradigm in this field.
The so-called jurisprudence school and non-jurisprudence school are oftenvisible in Chinese literature. Gluckman was the typical representative of the former,while Bohannan was the leader of the latter. But I traced from Professor Lin Duan, theearliest user of those Chinese concepts, to Uwe Wesel, a German scholar who greatlyexaggerated this issue, and to Simon Roberts, a British scholar who never used thetitle though he made four division, finding that there was no antagonism of the twofactions in Anglo-American legal anthropology. Relevant scholars can not be called"school" in the handling of the issue, non-jurisprudence school also did not escapedthe shadow of the Western law.
After the systematic analysis and comprehensive demonstration of the cause,passage and close of Gluckman-Bohannan debate, the fourth chapter explored theissues of the debate, and split it to into three-layer dilemma. The top one is theepistemological dilemma: how to understand the other law. Although the debate wasin the embryonic stage of the representative crisis of legal anthropology, it reflectedthe eternal problem of general and special. Compared with the debate on theresonableness aroused by religionary anthropology, Gluckman-Bohannan dabate haslittle self-examination on the epistemological consciousness, because the divaricationbetween the two sides focused on puzzlement of methodology that how other laws canbe shown up. There always exist two sharply different perspectives of emic and etic inAnglo-American legal anthropology, which typically embody itself as the debate.Compared with the essential-formal debate in economic anthropology, there are manysimilarities, but it also reflected the vulnerability of legal anthropology in size ofresearch, number of participants and the force.
Cross or branch? Gluckman-Bohannan debate typically reflected the identitydilemma of Anglo-American legal anthropology. Gluckman tried to tie anthropologywith law in a communicative way. He believed that using the legal method isbeneficial to interdisciplinarity. But it is a legal research only applied byanthropologist on, is a kind of anthropologic law. Since there was no proprietaryresearch methods, it will not be recognized, thus it could not achievedinterdisciplinarity. Bohannan stressed the particularity of anthropology, advocatedanthropological methods, called for a anthropological research by anthropologist onthe law. This is the true meaning of legal anthropolog, but found no method with theuniversal explanatory power, coupled with the lost of research objects, and legalanthropology increasingly marginalized. Compared with the Netherlandish legalanthropology established and succeeded by jurist, two different routes but in the sameresult: did not crossed disciplines.
In conclusion, this paper cited Sartre's existential perspective on the analysis ofthe other: Due to the emergence of his consciousness, self-consciousness will emerge.The other is a prerequisite for ego. In other words, understanding of the other actuallyopened the angle and depth of people's self-understanding. The author concluded thatself-examination and dilemma on the ontology are the only difference fromGluckman-Bohannan debate to the similar debate in other branch subject. This debatemade reflections on Western law and broke highness of Western law through the studyand discussion of non-Western law. Although seriously obstructed by law, legalanthropology offered another perspective for us to understand the law. However, theother faced by anthropology is not the "relative other", but the "complete other" or"absolute other" called by Levinas. Its character is that the other must not revert totheir identity or the same. This is always the ontological predicament of selfness. Andthis decides that anthropology of which come from the same body (Westernknowledge) with law, can not made a radical self-examination of Western law.
引文
1T. O. Elias, Reviews：Justice and Judgment among the Tiv, The International and Comparative Law Quarterly,Vol.8, No.1,1959, pp.233-234.
2E. Adamson Hoebel, Three Studies in African Law, Stanford Law Review, Vol.13, No.2,1961, p.433.
3Victor Ayoub, Review: The Judicial Process in Two African Societies, in Morris Janowitz ed., CommunityPolitical Systems, International Yearbook of Political Behavior Research, Vol.Ⅰ, Free Press,1961, pp.237-250.
4Max Gluckman, Concepts in the Comparative Study of Tribal Law, in Laura Nader ed., Law in Culture andSociety, Aldine Publish,1969, p.351; Paul Bohannan, Ethnography and Comparison in Legal Anthropology, inLaura Nader ed., Law in Culture and Society, Aldine Publish,1969, pp.406-408.
5Laura Nader, The Anthropological Study of Law, American Anthropologist, New Series, Vol.67, No.6,1965,pp.3-32.
1Laura Nader, The Anthropological Study of Law, American Anthropologist, New Series, Vol.67, No.6,1965,p.11.
2Laura Nader, The Anthropological Study of Law, American Anthropologist, New Series, Vol.67, No.6,1965,p.25.
3Max Gluckman, The Judicial Process among the Barotse of Northern Rhodesia, Manchester University Press,1967, p.376; Max Gluckman, Concepts in the Comparative Study of Tribal Law, in Laura Nader ed., Law inCulture and Society, Aldine Publish,1969, p.351.
4Laura Nader, Introduction, in Laura Nader ed., Law in Culture and Society, Aldine Publish,1969, p.4.
56Laura Nader, Introduction, in Laura Nader ed., Law in Culture and Society, Aldine Publish,1969, p.5.Laura Nader, Introduction, in Laura Nader ed., Law in Culture and Society, Aldine Publish,1969, p.5.
7Sally Falk Moore, Introduction: Comparative Studies, in Laura Nader ed., Law in Culture and Society, AldinePublish,1969, pp.337-348.
8Sally Falk Moore, Introduction: Comparative Studies, in Laura Nader ed., Law in Culture and Society, AldinePublish,1969, p.340.
12Sally Falk Moore, Law and Anthropology, Biennial Review of Anthropology, Vol.6,1969, pp.252-300.Sally Falk Moore, Law and Anthropology, Biennial Review of Anthropology, Vol.6,1969, p.265.
3Sally Falk Moore, Law and Anthropology, Biennial Review of Anthropology, Vol.6,1969, p.267.
4Richard L. Abel, A Comparative Theory of Dispute Institutions in Society, Law&Society Review, Vol.8, No.2,1974, pp.217-347.
5Bronislaw Malinowski, Crime and Custom in Savage Society, Greenwood Press,1926.
1Simon Roberts, Law and the Study of Social Control in Small-Scale Societies, The Modern Law Review, Vol.39,No.6,1976, pp.663-679.
2罗伯茨认为“原始(Primitive)”、“无文字(Preliterate)”、“前工业(Pre-industrial)”、“部落(Tribal)”等词汇似乎都不太合适，所以使用了“小型社会(Small-Scale Societies)”这个概念，那么小型社会的法律和社会控制实际上也就是法律人类学的研究内容。
3Simon Roberts, Law and the Study of Social Control in Small-Scale Societies, The Modern Law Review, Vol.39,No.6,1976, p.675.“旷日持久”，罗伯茨使用的英文是“Protracted”，这个单词在英文中还略微带有贬义色彩。
4Saltman Mickael, The Kipsigis：A Case Study in Changing Customary Law, Transaction Publishers,1977, p.3.
56P. H. Gulliver ed., Cross-Examinations Essay in Memory of Max Gluckman, E. J. Brill-Leiden,1978.P. H. Gulliver, Process and Decision, in P. H. Gulliver ed., Cross-Examinations Essay in Memory of MaxGluckman, E. J. Brill-Leiden,1978, p.31.
7Sally Falk Moore, Archaic Law and Modern Times on the Zambezi: Some Thoughts on Max Gluckman’sInterpretation of Barotse Law, in P. H. Gulliver ed., Cross-Examinations Essay in Memory of Max Gluckman, E. J.Brill-Leiden,1978, p.67.
1Simon Roberts, Do We Need an Anthropology of Law? RAIN, No.25,1978, p.4.
2Simon Roberts, Order and Dispute: An Introduction to Legal Anthropology, Penguin Books,1979.罗伯茨第一篇论文故意避开“法律人类学”这个概念而使用了“小型社会”，第二篇论文甚至呼吁“我们是否需要法律人类学？”，而现在却出版了一本“法律人类学导论”，由此可见他自创的替代性概念“小型社会”并没有得到多少认同，而第二篇论文的题目似乎也有些“标题党”的嫌疑。
3John L. Comaroff and Simon Roberts, Rules and Processes: The Cultural Logic of Dispute in an African Context,The University of Chicago Press,1981.
4关于罗伯茨先后四次对法律人类学的谱系划分，详细请参见本文第三章第三节。
5John L. Comaroff and Simon Roberts, Rules and Processes: The Cultural Logic of Dispute in an African Context,The University of Chicago Press,1981, p.252.
6Francis G. Snyder, Anthropology, Dispute Processes and Law: A Critical Introduction, British Journal of Law&Society, Vol.8, No.2,1981, p.157.
1John M. Conley and William M. O'Barr, Rules versus Relationships: The Ethnography of Legal Discourse,University of Chicago Press,1990.本书是芝加哥大学出版社“语言与法律话语”系列丛书之一。康利和奥巴也是这套系列丛书的主编。中文书评请参见胡鸿保、张晓红：《语言、话语与法律人类学———从<规则与关系———法律话语的民族志>一书谈起》，载《青海民族研究》2010年第1期。
2John M. Conley and William M. O'Barr, Rules versus Relationships: The Ethnography of Legal Discourse,University of Chicago Press,1990, p.195.
3John M. Conley and William M. O’Barr, Legal Anthropology Comes Home: A Brief History of the EthnographicStudy of Law, Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review, Vol.27,1993, pp.41-64.“回家”是指法律人类学转而研究本土的法律问题。关于“Comes Home”汉语资料中还有不同的译法，比如北京航空航天大学法学院明辉博士将其翻译为“解读”。但笔者认为结合上下文意思，翻译为“回家”更符合原意。参见明辉：《穿行于法律与人类学之间——西方法律人类学的历史、现状与趋势》，载《比较法研究》2008年第4期，第15页。
4Peter Just, History, Power, Ideology, and Culture: Current Directions in the Anthropology of Law, Law&Society Review, Vol.26, No.2,1992, p.386.
5Peter Just, History, Power, Ideology, and Culture: Current Directions in the Anthropology of Law, Law&Society Review, Vol.26, No.2,1992, p.387.
1Annelise Riles, Representing In-Between: Law, Anthropology, and the Rhetoric of Interdisciplinarity, U. Ill. L.Rev.597,1994.
2Chris Fuller, Legal Anthropology, Leagl Pluralism and Leagl Thought, Anthropology Today, Vol.10, No.3,1994,p.9.
3Norbert Rouland, Legal Anthropology, translated by Philippe G. Planel, The Athlone Press,1994.
4范沃伦霍芬（1874-1933），法学家，荷兰法律人类学的创始人。关于他的详细介绍请参见本文第四章第三节。
5John M. Conley and William M. O'Barr, Just Words：Law, Language, and Power, University of Chicago Press,1998, p.99.
1John M. Conley and William M. O'Barr, Just Words：Law, Language, and Power, University of Chicago Press,1998, p.98.
2John M. Conley and William M. O'Barr, Just Words：Law, Language, and Power, University of Chicago Press,1998, p.99,101.
3Peter Sack, Law, Language, Culture: Verbal Acrobatics and Social Technology,41J. Legal Pluralism&Unofficial L,1998, p.19.
4Peter Sack, Law, Language, Culture: Verbal Acrobatics and Social Technology,41J. Legal Pluralism&Unofficial L,1998, p.19.
5Simon Roberts, Against Legal Pluralism: Some Reflections of the Contemporary Enlargement of the LegalDomain,42J. Legal Pluralism&Unofficial L,1998.
6Sally Falk Moore, Certainties Undone: Fifty Turbulent Years of Legal Anthropology,1949-1999, The Journal ofthe Royal Anthropological Institute, Vol.7,2001, pp.95-116.
1Wim M.J. van Binsbergen, Introduction: The Dynamics of Power and the Rule of Law in Africa and Beyond,inWim M. J. van Binsbergen ed., The Dynamics of Power and the Rule of Law: Essays on Africa and Beyond；inHonour of Emile Adriaan B. van Rouveroy van Nieuwaal, Lit-Verlag,2003, p.15.
2派克和哈里斯的争论参见Thomas N. Headland, Kenneth Lee Pike, Marvin Harris ed., Emics and Etics theInsider/Outsider Debate, Sage Publications,1990.这本论文集并没有提到格博之争。
3John M. Conley and William M. O’Barr, A Classic in Spite of Itself: The Cheyenne Way and the Case Method inLegal Anthropology, Law and Social Inquiry, Vol.29,2004, pp.179-217.
4Tom Bennett, Customary Law in South Africa, Juta and Company Ltd.,2004, p.8.
5Tom Bennett, Customary Law in South Africa, Juta and Company Ltd.,2004, p.8.
6Sally Engle Merry, Transnational Human Rights and Local Activism: Mapping the Middle, AmericanAnthropologist, Vol.108, Issue1, pp.38–51.
1Sally Engle Merry, Transnational Human Rights and Local Activism: Mapping the Middle, AmericanAnthropologist, Vol.108, Issue1, p.41.
2Sally Engle Merry, Transnational Human Rights and Local Activism: Mapping the Middle, American
3Anthropologist, Vol.108, Issue1, p.41.James M. Donovan, Legal Anthropology: An Introduction, Altamira Press,2008.
4Bergendorff Steen, Contextual Translation--Concepts and Practices Among the Mekeo of Papua New Guinea,Oceania, Vol.79, No.3,2009, p.225.
5Michele Stephen, A'aisa's Gift. A Study of Magic and the Self, University of California Press,1995; Alan Jones,Mekeo Chiefs and Sorcerers: Metaphor, Ideology and Practice, Oceania, Vol.77, No.3,2007, pp.286-312.
1John L. Comaroff and Simon Roberts, Rules and Processes: The Cultural Logic of Dispute in an African Context,The University of Chicago Press,1981, p.252.
1尤陈俊：《困境及其超越：当代中国法学研究中的法律人类学》，载郑永流主编：《法哲学与法社会学论丛》，第11期，北京大学出版社2007年版，第96页。
2[澳]M.克雷齐尔：《法律人类学评介》（傅再明译），《国外社会科学》1987年第11期。
3文章最初收录入于澳大利亚哲学家尤金卡缅卡（Eugene Kamenk）夫妇主编的论文集《法律与社会控制》。Martin Krygier, Anthropological Approaches, in Eugene Kamenka and Alice Erh-Soon Tay eds., Law and SocialControl, Edward Arnold,1980, pp.27-59.
4[德]K.F.科克：《法律与人类学》（杨周云译），《世界民族》1987年第6期。
5Klaus Friedrich Koch，Law and Anthropology: Notes on Interdisciplinary Research，in Peter B. Hammond eds.,Cultural and Social anthropology: Introductory Readings in Ethnology, Collier Macmillan Ltd,1975.这篇文章最早以“Law andAnthropology: Thoughts on Interdisciplinary Research”为名发表于Law and Society Review,Vol.4,1969, pp.11-27.
1该文最早发表于《中国论坛》1988年第298期，第72-78页及第299期，第62-68页。后收录于林端：《儒家伦理与法律文化：社会学观点的探索》，中国政法大学出版社2002年版，第19-47页。
2Paul Bohannan, The Differing Realms of the Law, in Paul Bohannan ed., Law and Warfare：Studies in theAnthropology of Conflict, The Natural History Press,1967, pp.43-58; Laura Nader, Koch Klaus, Cox Bruce, TheEthnography of Law: A Bibliographic Survey, Current Anthropology, Vol.7, No.3,1966; Laura Nader, TheAnthropological Study of Law, American Anthropologist, New Series, Vol.67, No.6,1965, pp.3-32; Laura Naderand B. Yngvesson, On Studying the Ethnography of Law and Consequences, in John Joseph Honigmann ed., AHandbook of Social and Cultural Anthropology, Rand McNally,1973; Leopold Pospisil, The Attributes of Law, inPaul Bohannan ed., Law and Warfare：Studies in the Anthropology of Conflict, The Natural History Press,1967,pp.25-42; Simon Roberts, Order and Dispute, An Introduction to Legal Anthropology, Penguin Book,Harmondsworth,1979.
34Uwe Wesel, Fruhformen des Rechts in Vorstaatlichen Gesellschaften, Suhrkamp,1985.R. Schott, Rechtsethnologie, in Hans Fischer Hg. Ethnologie, eine Einführung, Dietrich Reimer Verlag,1983,s.181-203.
5梁治平：《法律的文化解释》，载梁治平主编：《法律的文化解释》，生活·读书·新知三联书店1998年版，第20-27页。
6Leopold Pospisil, The Ethnology of Law, Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Inc.,1972.
1Max Gluckman, Politics, Law and Ritual in Tribal Society, Oxford Basil Blackwell,1965.
2赵旭东：《部落社会中的政治、法律与仪式》，载《民俗研究》1999年第4期。
3杨方泉：《法律人类学研究述评》，载《学术研究》2003年第2期。
4张冠梓：《法人类学的理论方法及其流变》，载《国外社会科学》2003年第5期。
5徐亚文、孙国东：《为法治找寻沃土──法律人类学的历史、主题与启示》，载《求索》2004年第3期。
6高丙中、章邵增：《以法律多元为基础的民族志研究》，载《中国社会科学》2005年第5期。
7赵旭东：《秩序、过程与文化———西方法律人类学的发展及其问题》，载《环球法律评论》2005年第5期。
1李婉琳著：《社会变迁中的法律——穆尔法人类学思想研究》，中国人民公安大学出版社2011年版，第
119-124页。
2John M. Conley and William M. O’Barr, Just Words：Law, Language, and Power, The University of ChicagoPress,1998, p.98.
3Annelise Riles, Representing In-Between: Law, Anthropology, and the Rhetoric of Interdisciplinarity, U. Ill. L.Rev.597,1994, p.604.
4Simon Roberts, Do We Need an Anthropology of Law? RAIN, No.25,1978, pp.4,6-7.
1陈柏峰：《法律民族志与当代中国法律社会学的使命》，载郑永流主编：《法哲学与法社会学论丛》，第11期，北京大学出版社2007年版，第123页。
2明辉：《穿行于法律与人类学之间———西方法律人类学的历史、现状及趋势》，载《比较法研究》2008年第4期。
3Paul Bohannan, Justice and Judgment among the Tiv, Waveland Press,1989, p.vii.博安南的原文为“I wasconvinced in1957, and I still am, that filling Tiv data into a model of Western jurisprudence is squeezing parakeetsinto pigeonholes and not a way to go about ethnography.”这里引用的是明辉的译法，参见明辉：《穿行于法律与人类学之间———西方法律人类学的历史、现状及趋势》，载《比较法研究》2008年第4期，第19页。
4严文强：《凉山彝族习惯法的历史流变——以案例分析为中心的研究》，西南政法大学博士学位论文，2008年，第6页。
5周欣宇：《文化与制度：藏区命价纠纷的法律分析》，西南政法大学博士学位论文，2009年，第8页。
6比如严文强发表的与其博士论文相关的一篇文章中，论述了“规则中心”研究路径有着重大缺陷，引用“削足适履”对其进行批判，可是博安南恰好是规则中心路径的代表人物。参见严文强：《阐释真实的法律生活——论法人类学对纠纷的研究》，载《宁夏大学学报》（人文社会科学版）2008年第3期，第97-98页。
1参见朱晓阳：《语言混乱与法律人类学的整体论进路》，载《中国社会科学》2007年第2期。
2参见王海军：《发生学方法与中国法制史的研究》，载《中南大学学报(社会科学版)》2010年第6期，第64页。
1Norbert Rouland, Legal Anthropology, translated by Philippe G. Planel, The Athlone Press,1994, p.86.
2参见郑家馨主编：《殖民主义史·非洲卷》，北京大学出版社2000年版，第52页。
3参见孙红旗著：《殖民主义与非洲专论》，中国矿业大学出版社2008年版，第35页。
4David Kenneth Fieldhouse, The Colonial Empires, Macmillan,1982, p.373.
1Norbert Rouland, Legal Anthropology, translated by Philippe G. Planel, The Athlone Press,1994, p.82.
2参见[美]西奥多·M.波特、多萝西·罗斯主编：《剑桥科学史·第七卷：现代社会科学》，第七卷翻译委员会译，大象出版社2008年版，第324页。
1参见陈启能主编：《大英帝国从殖民地撤退前后》，方志出版社2007年版，第7页。
1Cecil Rhodes, at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cecil_Rhodes, Oct.29,2011.
2Rhodes Scholarships, at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rhodes_Scholarship, Oct.29,2011.
1Max Gluckman, The Judicial Process among the Barotse of Northern Rhodesia, Manchester University Press,1955, p.xix.
2Raymond Firth, Max Gluckman,1911-1975, Proceedings of the British Academy, Vol.61,1975, p.479.
3里弗斯（1864-1922），英国人类学家，曾参与了1898年著名的托雷斯海峡调查，被认为是英国人类学第二代学者中的核心人物，对马林诺夫斯基产生了较大影响。
4威廉·冯特（1832－1920）德国著名心理学家、生理学家，心理学发展史上的开创性人物。
5夏希原：《马克斯·格卢克曼的社会人类学》，中央民族大学硕士学位论文，2010年，第7页。
6Raymond Firth, Max Gluckman,1911-1975, Proceedings of the British Academy, Vol.61,1975, p.480.
1Robert Ranulph Marett, at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Marett, Oct.30,2011.
23Raymond Firth, Max Gluckman,1911-1975, Proceedings of the British Academy, Vol.61,1975, p.480.Thomas H. Maugh, Paul Bohannan, athttp://www.latimes.com/news/science/la-me-bohannan2aug02,1,1578759.story?coll=la-news-science,Oct.30,2011.
4Laura Bohannan, Shakespeare in the Bush: An American Anthropologist Set Out to Study the Tiv of West Africaand was Taught the True Meaning of Hamlet, Natural History, Vol.66,1966, pp.28-33.
1Laura Bohannan, at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laura_Bohannan, Oct.31,2011.
2Paul Bohannan, Africa and Africans, The Natural History Press,1964, perface.
3Paul Bohannan, Ethnography and Comparison in Legal Anthropology, in Laura Nader ed., Law in Culture andSociety, Aldine Publish,1969, p.406.
4David Kenneth Fieldhouse, The Colonial Empires, Macmillan,1982, p.249.
5参见高岱、郑家馨著：《殖民主义史·总论卷》，北京大学出版社2003年版，第207页。
1参见高岱、郑家馨著：《殖民主义史·总论卷》，北京大学出版社2003年版，第207-209页。
23David Kenneth Fieldhouse, Colonialism1870-1945, Weidenfield and Nicholson,1981, p.31.Frederick Lugard, The Dual Mandate in British Tropical Africa, W. Blackwood and Sons,1922.
4Frederick John Dealtry Lugard, at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frederick_Lugard,_1st_Baron_Lugard,Nov.1,2011.
5参见孙红旗著：《殖民主义与非洲专论》，中国矿业大学出版社2008年版，第80-81页。
6参见何勤华、洪永红主编：《非洲法律发达史》，法律出版社2006年版，第179-182页。
1[美]埃里克·吉尔伯特、乔纳森·雷诺兹：《非洲史》，黄磷译，海南出版社2007年版，第322页。
2陆庭恩、彭坤元主编：《非洲通史·现代卷》，华东师范大学出版社1995年版，第48页。
3[美]埃里克·吉尔伯特、乔纳森·雷诺兹：《非洲史》，黄磷译，海南出版社2007年版，第339页。
4参见孙红旗著：《殖民主义与非洲专论》，中国矿业大学出版社2008年版，第81页。
5参见何勤华、洪永红主编：《非洲法律发达史》，法律出版社2006年版，第184页。
6[美]埃里克·吉尔伯特、乔纳森·雷诺兹：《非洲史》，黄磷译，海南出版社2007年版，第325页。
7关于研究院成立的具体情况详细请参见Richard Brown, Passages in the Life of a WhiteAnthropologist: MaxGluckman in Northern Rhodesia, Journal of African History, Vol.20,1979, p.526.
8为了纪念英国传教士、探险家大卫·利文斯顿（Livingstone David）而得名。位于赞比西河中上游北岸，隔河与津巴布韦相望。赞比亚独立之后，成为南部省省会。
1Raymond Firth, Max Gluckman,1911-1975, Proceedings of the British Academy, Vol.61,1975, p.480.
2格卢克曼关于祖鲁兰的第一篇研究论文——《南非的祖鲁王国》收录于埃文斯-普里查德和迈耶福蒂斯主编的《非洲政治制度》，出版于1940年。Max Gluckman, The Kingdom of the Zulu of SouthAfrica in M. Fortesand Evans-Pritchard ed., Africa Political Systems, London,1940, pp.25-55.
3Godfrey Wilson, at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godfrey_Wilson, Nov.3,2011.
4Max Gluckman, The Seven Year Research Plan of the Rhodes-Livingstone Institute of Social Studies in BritishCentral Central Africa, Rhodes-Livingstone Institute Journal, Vol.4,1945, p.1.
1Max Gluckman, The Judicial Process among the Barotse of Northern Rhodesia, Manchester University Press,1955, p.xxii.
2Max Gluckman, The Ideas in Barotse Jurisprudence, Yale University Press,1965, p.xviii.
1参见何勤华、洪永红主编：《非洲法律发达史》，法律出版社2006年版，第183页。
1Paul Bohannan, Justice and Judgment Among the Tiv, Oxford University Press,1957, pp.7-14.
2温纳-格伦人类学研究基金会前身为维京基金（Viking Fund），由瑞典企业家阿克塞尔·温纳-格伦（AxelWenner-Gren）于1941年创建。1951年正式更名为温纳-格伦人类学研究基金会，全力支持人类学研究。1958年至1980年，在奥地利的瓦尔腾贝格召开了几十场人类学会议，其中就包括1966年格卢克曼和博安南曾当面进行过争论的那场国际法律人类学会议。
3Paul Bohannan, Justice and Judgment among the Tiv, Oxford University Press,1957, p.vii.
4Tiv, at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tiv_people, Nov.4,2011.
5Pamela J. Johnson: Pioneering Anthropologist was Authority on the Tiv Tribe, athttp://dornsife.usc.edu/news/stories/378/pioneering-anthropologist-was-authority-on-the-tiv-tribe/, Oct.1,2011.
6Paul Bohannan, Justice and Judgment Among the Tiv, Oxford University Press,1957, p.8.
1Paul Bohannan, Justice and Judgment Among the Tiv, Oxford University Press,1957, pp.v-vi.
2Paul Bohannan, Justice and Judgment Among the Tiv, Oxford University Press,1957, p.vi.
3Paul Bohannan, Concepts of Time among the Tiv of Nigeria, Southwestern Journal of Anthropology, Vol.9, No.3,1953, p.251.
4Laura Bohannan and Paul Bohannan, The Tiv of Central Nigeria, International African Institute,1953.
5Fabian Johannes, Time and Other：How Anthropology Makes its Object, Columbia University Press,1983, p.25.
1王铭铭：《从“没有统治者的部落”到“剧场国家”》，载《西北民族研究》2010年第3期，第41页。
2Paul Bohannan, Justice and Judgment Among the Tiv, Oxford University Press,1957, p.14.
3Laura Nader, Koch Klaus and Bruce Cox, The Ethnography of Law: A Bibliographic Survey, CurrentAnthropology, Vol.7, No.3,1966, pp.267-294.
1这份文献目录的入选标准包括：1、专业人类学家关于法律的实证田野研究；2、某些地区尚属空白，而传教士和当地官员的研究确实非常优秀；3、法学家和法官的作品；4、旅行报告和见闻；5、少数哲学家的研究。Laura Nader, Koch Klaus and Bruce Cox, The Ethnography of Law: A Bibliographic Survey, CurrentAnthropology,1966, Vol.7, No.3, p.267.
2Polo de Ondegardo, Report, in Narratives of the Rites and Laws of the Incas, translated by Clements R.Markham, London,1837, pp.150-171. from Laura Nader, Koch Klaus and Bruce Cox, The Ethnography of Law: ABibliographic Survey, Current Anthropology, Vol.7, No.3,1966, p.288.
3比如，Simon Roberts, Law and the Study of Social Control in Small-Scale Societies, The Modern Law Review,Vol.39, No.6,1976, p.663; Francis G. Snyder, Anthropology, Dispute Processes and Law: A Critical Introduction,British Journal of Law&Society, Vol.8, No.2,1981, p.142; John M. Conley and William M. O’Barr, LegalAnthropology Comes Home: A Brief History of the Ethnographic Study of Law, Loyola of Los Angeles LawReview, Vol.27,1993, p.43.
4Simon Roberts, Law and the Study of Social Control in Small-Scale Societies, The Modern Law Review, Vol.39,No.6,1976, p.663.
5John M. Conley and William M. O’Barr, Legal Anthropology Comes Home: A Brief History of the EthnographicStudy of Law, Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review, Vol.27,1993, p.44.康利和奥巴还特别指出“摩尔根却是最早的试图系统性的了解人类文化差异性的学者”。但摩尔根的《古代社会》一般不认为是一部法律人类学的作品。
12Laura Nader, The Anthropological Study of Law, American Anthropologist, New Series, Vol.67, No.6,1965, p.3.Roy Franklin Barton, Ifugao law, University of California Publications in American Archaeology and Ethnology,Vol.15,1919, pp.1-180.
3A. L. Kroeber, Roy Franklin Barton,1883-1947, American Anthropologist, Vol.51,1949, p.91.
4Sally Falk Moore, Law and Anthropology, Biennial Review of Anthropology, Vol.6,1969, p.256.
5Annelise Riles, Representing In-Between: Law,Anthropology, and the Rhetoric of Interdisciplinarity, U. Ill. L.Rev.597,1994, p.603.
6Simon Roberts, Law and the Study of Social Control in Small-Scale Societies, The Modern Law Review, Vol.39,No.6,1976, p.673.在随后的几篇文章中，罗伯茨所提出的“两种研究模式”在表述和标准上都有所变化，但不管采取什么划分方式，罗伯茨总是把马林诺夫斯基置于后一种研究套路，即关于秩序的更为宽泛的研究、秩序和纠纷的研究、过程主义范式。Simon Roberts, Do We Need anAnthropology of Law? RAIN, No.25,1978,p.7; Simon Roberts, Order and Dispute: An Introduction to Legal Anthropology, Penguin Books,1979, pp.198-199;John L. Comaroff and Simon Roberts, Rules and Processes: The Cultural Logic of Dispute in an African Context,The University of Chicago Press,1981, p.11.
7Francis G. Snyder, Anthropology, Dispute Processes and Law: A Critical Introduction, British Journal of Law&Society, Vol.8,1981, p.142.
8John M. Conley and William M. O’Barr, Legal Anthropology Comes Home: A Brief History of the EthnographicStudy of Law, Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review, Vol.27,1993, p.46.
1Francis G. Snyder, Anthropology, Dispute Processes and Law: A Critical Introduction, British Journal of Law&
2Society, Vol.8,1981, p.142.Richard L. Abel, A Comparative Theory of Dispute Institutions in Society, Law&Society Review, Vol.8, No.2,1984, p.305.
3[英]马林诺夫斯基：《原始社会的犯罪与习俗》，原江译，法律出版社2007年版，第23页。
4[英]马林诺夫斯基：《原始社会的犯罪与习俗》，原江译，法律出版社2007年版，第38页。
5Simon Roberts, Order and Dispute: An Introduction to Legal Anthropology, Penguin Books,1979, p.12.
1[英]马林诺夫斯基：《原始社会的犯罪与习俗》，原江译，法律出版社2007年版，第45页。
2Richard L. Abel, A Comparative Theory of Dispute Institutions in Society, Law&Society Review, Vol.8, No.2,1974, p.224.
3关于马林诺夫斯基就法律概念的讨论请参见A. Richards, The Concept of Culture in Malinqwski’s Work andSchapera, Malinowski’s Theories of Law, in Raymond Firth ed., Man and Culture: An Evaluation of the Work ofBronislaw Malinowiki, Routledge&K. Paul,1957, pp.15-31,139-155.
1Bronislaw Malinowski, at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bronis%C5%82aw_Malinowski, Nov.5,2011.
2Bronislaw Malinowski, A Diary in the Strict Sense of the Term, Harcourt, Brace&World,1967.
1Isaac Schapera, at http://archives.lse.ac.uk/Record.aspx?src=CalmView.Catalog&id=SCHAPERA, Nov.5,2011.
23Isaac Schapera, Handbook of Tswana Law and Custom, Oxford University Press,1938.Sally Falk Moore, Law and Anthropology, Biennial Review of Anthropology, Vol.6,1969, p.261.
4Simon Roberts, Law and the Study of Social Control in Small-Scale Societies, The Modern Law Review, Vol.39,No.6,1976, p.668.
5James M. Donovan, Legal Anthropology: An Introduction, Altamira Press,2008, p.165.
6Isaac Schapera, Handbook of Tswana Law and Custom, Oxford University Press,1938, p.x.
1William Twining, Law and Anthropology: A Case Study in Inter-Disciplinary Collaboration, Law&SocietyReview, Vol.7, No.4,1973, p.563.
2William Twining, Law and Anthropology: A Case Study in Inter-Disciplinary Collaboration, Law&Society
3Review, Vol.7, No.4,1973, pp.563-564.William Twining, Law and Anthropology: A Case Study in Inter-Disciplinary Collaboration, Law&SocietyReview, Vol.7, No.4,1973, p.563.
4“那个夏末，卢埃林和他的妻子——一位经济学家，用十天时间参加了霍贝尔在蒙大拿州的考察——那是他在夏延度过的全部时间。”参见John M. Conley and Willian M. O‘Barr，AClassic In Spirit of Itself：TheCheyenne Way and the Case Method in Legal Anthropology, Law and Social Inquiry, Vol.29,2004, p.186.
5William Twining, Law and Anthropology: A Case Study in Inter-Disciplinary Collaboration, Law&SocietyReview, Vol.7, No.4,1973, p.564.
6Francis G. Snyder, Anthropology, Dispute Processes and Law: A Critical Introduction, British Journal of Law&Society, Vol.8,1981, p143.7P. H. Gulliver, Introduction for Case Studies of Law in Non-Western Societies, in Laura Nader ed., Law inCulture and Society, University of California Press,1969, p.11.
8Laura Nader, The Anthropological Study of Law, American Anthropologist New Series, Vol.67, No.6,1965,p.10.
1William Twining, Karl Llewellyn and the Realist Movement, Weidenfeld and Nicolson,1973, p.178.
2不过，霍贝尔本人对此却持不同意见。据与霍贝尔就这一问题进行过私人交流的威廉·特文宁介绍，“一些学者认为‘民俗’概念和‘分析’概念对于比较法而言缺一不可，从而可以解决这个问题，霍贝尔就是其中之一。霍贝尔承认在《夏延人的方式》中，他和卢埃林因为对他们的语言习惯和民俗概念没有给予足够的关注而导致他们错过了夏延人法律行为中的一些微妙的意义，但这并不代表他们忽视了当地人的内部视角。”William Twining, A Post-Westphalian Conception of Law, Law&Society Review, Vol.37, No.1,2003,p.229.
3William Twining, Karl Llewellyn and the Realist Movement, Weidenfeld and Nicolson,1973, p.145.
4[美]西奥多·M.波特、多萝西·罗斯主编：《剑桥科学史·第七卷：现代社会科学》，第七卷翻译委员会译，大象出版社2008年版，第183页。
1参见[挪威]费雷德里克·巴特、[奥]安德烈·金格里希、[英]罗伯特·帕金、[美]西德尔·希尔弗曼：《人类学的四大传统——英国、德国、法国和美国的人类学》，高丙中等译，商务印书馆2008年版，第11页。
2参见[美]西奥多·M.波特、多萝西·罗斯主编：《剑桥科学史·第七卷：现代社会科学》，第七卷翻译委员会译，大象出版社2008年版，第3页。
3“Ethnography is the Laboratory of Social Science”。参见Malinowski Bronislaw, The Present State of Studies inCulture Contact: Some Comments on an American Approach, Africa Ⅻ,1939, p.27.不过美国人类学家埃尔曼·瑟维斯（Elman Service）认为相比于拉德克里夫-布朗，马林诺夫斯基应属于人文科学观的支持者。参
见[美]埃尔曼·R.瑟维斯：《人类学百年争论：1860-1960》，贺志雄等译，云南大学出版社1997年版，第
332页。
4[英]阿兰·巴纳德：《人类学历史与理论》，王建民、刘源、许丹等译，华夏出版社2006年版，第110页。
5参见郑戈：《法学是一门社会科学吗?——试论“法律科学”的属性及其研究方法》，载《北大法律评论》1998年第1期，第4页。
1参见张庆熊著：《社会科学的哲学——实证主义、诠释学和维特根斯坦的转型》，复旦大学出版社2010年版，第1页。
2洪汉鼎著：《当代西方哲学两大思潮》，下册，商务印书馆2010年版，第449页。
3洪汉鼎著：《当代西方哲学两大思潮》，下册，商务印书馆2010年版，第449页。
4E. E. Evans-Pritchard, Social Anthropology: Past and Present, Marett Lecture(1950), in Essays in SocialAnthropology, Faber and Faber,1962, p.26.
5[美]克利福德格尔茨：《文化的解释》，韩莉译，译林出版社2008年版，第1页。
6参见[美]西奥多·M.波特、多萝西·罗斯主编：《剑桥科学史·第七卷：现代社会科学》，第七卷翻译委员会译，大象出版社2008年版，第198页。
1[美]西奥多·M.波特、多萝西·罗斯主编：《剑桥科学史·第七卷：现代社会科学》，第七卷翻译委员会译，大象出版社2008年版，第624页。
2[英]阿兰·巴纳德：《人类学历史与理论》，王建民、刘源、许丹等译，华夏出版社2006年版，第110-111页。
3Franz Boas, The Mind of Primitive Man,Macmillan,1938, pp.196-197.
4参见[美]威廉·亚当斯：《人类学的哲学之根》，黄剑波、李文建译，广西师范大学出版社2006年版，第
280-282页。
5[美]西奥多·M.波特、多萝西·罗斯主编：《剑桥科学史·第七卷：现代社会科学》，第七卷翻译委员会译，大象出版社2008年版，第626页。
1William Fielding Ogburn and Alexander Goldenweiser ed., The Social Sciences, Houghton Mifflin Company,1927, p.51.
2[美]西奥多·M.波特、多萝西·罗斯主编：《剑桥科学史·第七卷：现代社会科学》，第七卷翻译委员会译，大象出版社2008年版，第627页。
3高春常：《“赫斯科维茨———弗雷泽争议”及其余波》，载《历史教学》2007年第4期，第44页。
4Melville Jean Herskovits, Man and His Works: The Science of Cultural Anthropology, Knopf,1948, p.76.
1参见张旭东著：《全球化时代的文化认同》，北京大学出版社2006年版，第5页。
2童世骏：《为何种普遍主义辩护——与赵敦华教授商榷》，载《学术月刊》2007年第5期，第45页。
3参见马德普著：《普遍主义的贫困——自由主义政治哲学批判》，人民出版社2005年版，第5页。
4参见[英]阿兰·巴纳德《：人类学历史与理论》，王建民、刘源、许丹等译，华夏出版社2006年版，第110-111页。
1参见纳日碧力戈著：《语言人类学》，华东理工大学出版社2010年版，第18页。
2参见刘润清编著：《西方语言学流派》，外语教学与研究出版社2002年版，第130-139页。
1参见[英]阿兰·巴纳德《：人类学历史与理论》，王建民、刘源、许丹等译，华夏出版社2006年版，第123-124页。
2Kenneth Lee Pike, Language in Relation to a Unified Theory of the Structure of Human Behaviour, PartⅠ,Summer Institute of Linguistics,1954, p.42.
3参见[美]帕梯·J.皮尔托、格丽特尔·H.皮尔托：《人类学中的主位和客位研究法》（胡燕子译），《民族译丛》1991年第4期，第20页。
4Annelise Riles, Representing In-Between: Law, Anthropology, and the Rhetoric of Interdisciplinarity, U. Ill. L.Rev.597,1994, p.604.
1Paul Bohannan,at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Bohannan, Nov.10,2011.
2Thomas H. Maugh, Paul Bohannan,87; USC Anthropologist Researched Nigerian Culture and AmericanDivorce, at http://www.latimes.com/news/science/la-me-bohannan2aug02,1,1578759.story?coll=la-news-science,Nov.10,2011.
1Paul Bohannan, at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Bohannan, Nov.10,2011.
2Herskovits Prize, at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Herskovitz_Prize, Nov.10,2011.
3Paul Bohannan, Justice and Judgment among the Tiv, Waveland Press,1957, p.xxi.
4John M. Conley and William M. O'Barr, Just Words; Law, Language, and Power, University of Chicago Press,1998, p.102.
1Paul Bohannan, Justice and Judgment among the Tiv, Waveland Press,1989, p.vii.
2Paul Bohannan, Social Anthropology, Holt, Rinehart and Winston,1963, p.42.
3Tom Bennett, Customary Law in South Africa, Juta and Company Ltd.,2004, p.8.
1Paul Bohannan, Justice and Judgment among the Tiv, Oxford University Press,1957, p.vi.
2关于博安南在语言问题上的观点，还可以参见他于1955年至1958年在《美国人类学家》杂志上与其他几位学者之间的争论。Paula Brown, Review: Tiv Farm and Settlement,American Anthropologist, New Series,Vol.57, No.6,1955, pp.1321-1322; Paul Bohannan, On the Use of Native Language Categories in Ethnology,American Anthropologist, New Series, Vol.58, No.3,1956, p.557; Ralph L. Beals, Native Terms andAnthropological Methods, American Anthropologist, New Series, Vol.59, No.4,1957, pp.716-717; Paul Bohannan,On Anthropologists' Use of Language, American Anthropologist, New Series, Vol.60, No.1,1958, pp.161-163;Douglas Taylor, On Anthropologists'Use of Linguistics, American Anthropologist, New Series, Vol.60, No.5,1958,pp.940-941; Paul Bohannan, On Anthropologists' Use of Linguistics: Rejoinder, American Anthropologist, NewSeries, Vol.60, No.5,1958, pp.941-942.
3James N. D. Anderson, Islamic Law in Africa, Colonial Research Publication,1954.安德森（1908-1994），英国传教士，阿拉伯学研究者。
1Arnold Leonard Epstein, Juridical Techniques and The Judicial Process: A Study in African Customary Law,Manchester University Press,1954.爱泼斯坦（1924-1999），英国人类学家，格卢克曼在利文斯顿研究院的同事，曼城学派又一代表学者。
2Paul Philip Howell, A Manual of Nuer Law: Being an Account of Customary Law, its Evolution andDevelopment in the Courts Established by the Sudan Government, Negro Universities Press,1954.豪厄尔
(1917-1994)，英国殖民官，人类学家。
3Max Gluckman, The Judicial Process among the Barotse of Northern Rhodesia, Manchester University Press,1967, p.368.
4参见[英] A.R.拉德克利夫-布朗：《原始社会的结构和功能》，潘蛟、王贤海、刘文远、知寒译，中央民族大学出版社1999年版，第237页。
5Peter Sack, Law, Language, Culture: Verbal Acrobatics and Social Technology,41J. Legal Pluralism&Unofficial L,1998, p.20.
6Paul Philip Howell, A Manual of Nuer Law: Being an Account of Customary Law, its Evolution andDevelopment in the Courts Established by the Sudan Government, Negro Universities Press,1954, p.225.
1Max Gluckman, The Judicial Process among the Barotse of Northern Rhodesia, Manchester University Press,1967, p.400.
2A. S. Diamond, Review: The Law of Primitive Man-A Study in Comparative Legal Dynamics and The JudicialProcess among the Barotse of Northern Rhodesia, The International and Comparative Law Quarterly, Vol.5, No.4,1956, p.624.
3Joan Vincent, Anthropology and Politics: Visions, Traditions, and Trends, University of Arizona Press,1990,4p.307.Robert M. Hayden, Review: Rules, Processes,and Interpretations: Geertz, Comaroff, and Roberts, American BarFoundation Research Journal, Vol.9, No.2,1984, pp.469-470; Chris Fuller, Legal Anthropology, Leagl Pluralismand Leagl Thought, Anthropology Today, Vol.10, No.3,1994, p.9.
5Laura Nader and Harry F. Todd ed., The Disputing Process: Law in Ten Societies, Columbia University Press,1978, p.5.
1E. Adamson Hoebel, Review: The Judicial Process among the Barotse of Northern Rhodesia, The University ofChicago Law Review, Vol.23, No.3,1956, p.546.关于格卢克曼较之霍贝尔的突破，还可以参见James G. March,Sociological Jurisprudence Revisited, A Review (More or Less) of Max Gluckman, Stanford Law Review, Vol.8,No.3,1956, pp.500-502.
2Francis G. Snyder, Anthropology, Dispute Processes and Law: A Critical Introduction, British Journal of Law&Society, Vol.8,1981, p.143.这种开创性评价，还可以参见A. L. Goodhart, Foreword, in Max Gluckman, TheJudicial Process among the Barotse of Northern Rhodesia, Manchester University Press,1955, p.xiv; E. AdamsonHoebel, Review: The Judicial Process among the Barotse of Northern Rhodesia, The University of Chicago LawReview, Vol.23, No.3,1956, p.546; Sally Falk Moore, Law and Anthropology, Biennial Review of Anthropology,
3Vol.6,1969, p.263.Sally Falk Moore, Certainties Undone: Fifty Turbulent Years of Legal Anthropology,1949-1999, The Journal ofthe Royal Anthropological Institute, Vol.7,2001, p.97.
4Sally Falk Moore, Certainties Undone: Fifty Turbulent Years of Legal Anthropology,1949-1999, The Journal ofthe Royal Anthropological Institute, Vol.7,2001, p.97.
5Paul Bohannan, Africa and Africans, The Natural History Press,1964, perface.
1Sally Falk Moore, Certainties Undone: Fifty Turbulent Years of Legal Anthropology,1949-1999, The Journal ofthe Royal Anthropological Institute, Vol.7,2001, p.98.
2参见夏希原：《马克斯·格卢克曼的社会人类学》，中央民族大学硕士学位论文，2010年，第7页。
3Richard Brown, Passages in the Life of a White Anthropologist: Max Gluckman in Northern Rhodesia, Journalof African History, Vol.20,1979, p.527.这篇文章详细介绍了格卢克曼从1939年11月成为助理人类学者到1941年4月担任院长的这段时间前前后后所发生的一系列事件。
4Raymond Firth, Max Gluckman,1911-1975, Proceedings of the British Academy, Vol.61,1975, p.482.
1Richard Brown, Passages in the Life of a White Anthropologist: Max Gluckman in Northern Rhodesia, Journalof African History, Vol.20,1979, p.528.
2参见夏希原：《马克斯·格卢克曼的社会人类学》，中央民族大学硕士学位论文，2010年，第7页。
3[美]雪莉·奥特纳：《20世纪60年代以来的人类学理论》（黄剑波译），庄孔韶主编《人类学经典导读》，中国人民大学出版社2004年版，第624页。
4格卢克曼与马克思主义的关系请参见Raymond Firth, Max Gluckman,1911-1975, Proceedings of the BritishAcademy, Vol.61,1975, pp.493-494；夏希原：《马克斯·格卢克曼的社会人类学》，中央民族大学硕士学位论文，2010年，第77-79页。
5Sally Falk Moore, Archaic Law and Modern Times on the Zambezi: Some Thoughts on Max Gluckman’sInterpretation of Barotse Law, in P. H. Gulliver ed., Cross-Examinations Essay in Memory of Max Gluckman, E. J.Brill-Leiden,1978, p.56.
1Peter Just, History, Power, Ideology, and Culture: Current Directions in the Anthropology of Law, Law&Society Review, Vol.26, No.2,1992, p.387; Richard L. Abel, A Comparative Theory of Dispute Institutions inSociety, Law&Society Review, Vol.8, No.2,1974, p.304.再次强调，埃布尔没有标识科利尔发表这一观点的出处，估计来自于他与科利尔的私人交流。
2Victor Turne, Schism and Continuity in an African Society: A study of Ndembu Village Life, Manchester
3University Press,1957, pp.xxxii-xxxiii.John L. Comaroff and Simon Roberts, Rules and Processes: The Cultural Logic of Dispute in an African Context,The University of Chicago Press,1981, p.253.
4John L. Comaroff and Simon Roberts, Rules and Processes: The Cultural Logic of Dispute in an African Context,The University of Chicago Press,1981, pp.252-253.
5Adam Kuper, Anthropologists and Anthropology: The British School1922-1972, Penguin,1973, p.184.
1Max Gluckman, The Judicial Process among the Barotse of Northern Rhodesia, Manchester University Press,1955, p.xix.
2Max Gluckman, The Judicial Process among the Barotse of Northern Rhodesia, Manchester University Press,31955, p.xix.William Seagle, The Quest for Law, A. A. Knopf,1941.
4Julius Stone, The Province and Function of Law: Law as Logic, Justice and Social Control, A Study inJurisprudence, Associated General Publications Pty.ltd.,1946.
5Max Gluckman, The Ideas in Barotse Jurisprudence, Yale University Press,1965, p.xix
6William Seagle, Primitive law and Professor Malinowski, American Anthropologist, Vol.39,1937, pp.275-290.
1E. Adamson Hoebel, Review: The Quest for Law, American Anthropologist, Vol.44,1942, pp,141-143.
2关于朱利叶斯斯通的法律思想请参见薄振峰：《法律、理性与人类正义——朱利叶斯·斯通的实用主义正义观》，载《环球法律评论》2006年第2期。
3参见薄振峰：《法律、理性与人类正义——朱利叶斯·斯通的实用主义正义观》，载《环球法律评论》2006年第2期，第185页。
4Simon Roberts, Against Legal Pluralism: Some Reflections of the Contemporary Enlargement of the LegalDomain,42J. Legal Pluralism&Unofficial L.95,1998, p.103.
5Peter Sack, Law, Language, Culture: Verbal Acrobatics and Social Technology,41J. Legal Pluralism&Unofficial L,1998, p.19.
1Southern Bantoid, at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Southern_Bantoid, Nov.12,2011.
2Sally Falk Moore, Law and Anthropology, Biennial Review of Anthropology, Vol.6,1969, p.265.
3Sally Falk Moore, Law and Anthropology, Biennial Review of Anthropology, Vol.6,1969, pp.263-265.
4Max Gluckman, The Judicial Process among the Barotse of Northern Rhodesia, Manchester University Press,1955, p.xx.
1Max Gluckman, The Ideas in Barotse Jurisprudence, Yale University Press,1965.
2Max Gluckman, Natural Justice in Africa, Natural Law Forum, Vol.9,1964, pp.25-44.
1Max Gluckman, The Judicial Process among the Barotse of Northern Rhodesia, Manchester University Press,1955, p.xxii.
2刘星：《美国人手里的牛津大学法理学教鞭——德沃金的法理学革命》，载《比较法研究》1998年第3期，第331页。
3Max Gluckman, The Judicial Process among the Barotse of Northern Rhodesia, Manchester University Press,1955, p.xxi.
4A. L. Goodhart, Foreword, in Max Gluckman, The Judicial Process among the Barotse of Northern Rhodesia,Manchester University Press,1955, p.xiv.
1A. L. Goodhart, Foreword, in Max Gluckman, The Judicial Process among the Barotse of Northern Rhodesia,Manchester University Press,1955, p.xvii.
2Sally Falk Moore, Certainties Undone: Fifty Turbulent Years of Legal Anthropology,1949-1999, The Journal ofthe Royal Anthropological Institute, Vol.7,2001, pp.98-99.
3Max Gluckman, The Judicial Process among the Barotse of Northern Rhodesia, Manchester University Press,1955, p.xix.
1Max Gluckman, The Judicial Process among the Barotse of Northern Rhodesia, Manchester University Press,1955, p.xix.
2Max Gluckman, The Judicial Process among the Barotse of Northern Rhodesia, Manchester University Press,1955, p.xx.
3Max Gluckman, The Judicial Process among the Barotse of Northern Rhodesia, Manchester University Press,1955, p.xix.
4参见[南非]科尼利厄斯·G.凡·德尔·马尔维：《大陆法系与普通法系在南非与苏格兰的融合》（翟寅生译），《清华法律评论》2009年第1期，第82-85页。
1Max Gluckman, The Judicial Process among the Barotse of Northern Rhodesia, Manchester University Press,1955, p.xx.
2Max Gluckman, The Judicial Process among the Barotse of Northern Rhodesia, Manchester University Press,1955, p.xx.
3多萝西埃米特（1904-2000），女，英国哲学家，曾任曼城大学哲学系主任等职，代表作有《功能、目的和权力》、《自然的过程》。
4玛乔丽格林（1910-2009），女，美国哲学家，曾任美国形而上学研究会会长等职，代表作有《生物学哲学的方法》、《笛卡尔》。
5Max Gluckman, The Judicial Process among the Barotse of Northern Rhodesia, Manchester University Press,1955, p.xxi.
1Max Gluckman, The Judicial Process among the Barotse of Northern Rhodesia, Manchester University Press,1955, p.33.
2Max Gluckman, The Judicial Process among the Barotse of Northern Rhodesia, Manchester University Press,1955, pp.226-227.
3Max Gluckman, The Judicial Process among the Barotse of Northern Rhodesia, Manchester University Press,1955, p.229.
1Max Gluckman, The Judicial Process among the Barotse of Northern Rhodesia, Manchester University Press,1955, p.230.
2E. Adamson Hoebel, Three Studies in African Law, Stanford Law Review, Vol.13, No.2,1961, p.434.
1参见张民安著：《现代过错侵权责任制度研究》，中国政法大学出版社2002年版，第286页。
2John M. Conley and William M. O’Barr, A Classic in Spite of Itself: The Cheyenne Way and the Case Method inLegal Anthropology, Law and Social Inquiry, Vol.29,2004, p.210.
3Max Gluckman, The Judicial Process among the Barotse of Northern Rhodesia, Manchester University Press,1955, p.83.
1Max Gluckman, Order and Rebellion in tribal Africa, The Free Press of Glencoe,1963, p.178.1955年春，凭借着去年的良好口碑，格卢克曼再次得到了第三节目频道的邀请，为听众奉献了六场讲座，题目分别为：“领地的和平”、“权威的弱点”、“家庭的不和”、“巫术的逻辑”、“仪式的放纵”、“种族歧视的限制”。而后，六篇讲稿原封不动地被冠以“非洲的习惯和冲突”，由英国布莱克威尔出版社于1956年出版。这本著作基本上没有涉及法律内容，但通过题目却可以看出，格卢克曼对非洲社会的“法律”和“习惯”进行了区分。
2Max Gluckman, The Reasonbale Man in Barotse Law:(Ⅰ)The Case of the Violent Councillor, Journal ofAfrican Administration, Vol.7,1955, pp.51-55; Max Gluckman, The Reasonbale Man in Barotse Law:(Ⅱ)TheCase of the Eloping Wife, Journal of African Administration, Vol.7,1955, pp.127-131; Max Gluckman, TheReasonbale Man in Barotse Law:(Ⅲ)The Case of the“Dog-in-the-Manger”Headman, Journal of AfricanAdministration, Vol.8,1955, pp.101-105; Max Gluckman, The Reasonbale Man in Barotse Law:(Ⅳ)The Case ofthe Disprespectful Councillor, Journal of African Administration, Vol.8,1955, pp.151-156.
3Max Gluckman, Order and Rebellion in Tribal Africa, The Free Press of Glencoe,1963Chapter Ⅶ.
4Laura Nader, Koch Klaus and Bruce Cox, The Ethnography of Law: A Bibliographic Survey, CurrentAnthropology, Vol.7, No.3,1966, p.272.
1Max Gluckman, The Judicial Process among the Barotse of Northern Rhodesia, Manchester University Press,21955, p.357.James G. March, Sociological Jurisprudence Revisited, A Review (More or Less) of Max Gluckman, StanfordLaw Review, Vol.8, No.3,1956, p.510.
3Max Gluckman, In Reply, Stanford Law Review, Vol.8, No.4,1956, p.768.
4Max Gluckman, The Judicial Process among the Barotse of Northern Rhodesia, Manchester University Press,1955, p.224.
1Sally Falk Moore, Certainties Undone: Fifty Turbulent Years of Legal Anthropology,1949-1999, The Journal ofthe Royal Anthropological Institute, Vol.7,2001, p.98.
2Max Gluckman, The Judicial Process among the Barotse of Northern Rhodesia, Manchester University Press,1955, pp.25-29.
3Paul Bohannan, Justice and Judgment among the Tiv, Oxford University Press,1957, p.vi.
4[英]梅因：《古代法》，沈景一译，商务印书馆1959年版,第175页。
1Paul Bohannan, Justice and Judgment among the Tiv, Oxford University Press,1957, p.v.
2Paul Bohannan, Justice and Judgment among the Tiv, Oxford University Press,1957, p.4.
3Richard L. Abel, A Comparative Theory of Dispute Institutions in Society, Law&Society Review, Vol.8, No.2,1874, p.304.
1Paul Bohannan, Justice and Judgment among the Tiv, Oxford University Press,1957, pp.4-5.
1Paul Bohannan, Justice and Judgment among the Tiv, Oxford University Press,1957, p.5.
2Paul Bohannan, Justice and Judgment among the Tiv, Oxford University Press,1957, p.5.
3Paul Bohannan, Justice and Judgment Among the Tiv, Oxford University Press,1957, p.14.
4Samuel Enoch Stumpf, Review：The Judicial Process among the Barotse of Northern Rhodesia, Harvard LawReview, Vol.69, No.4,1956, pp.780-787.
5A. S. Diamond, Review: The Law of Primitive Man-A Study in Comparative Legal Dynamics and The JudicialProcess among the Barotse of Northern Rhodesia, The International and Comparative Law Quarterly, Vol.5, No.4,1956, pp.624-628; J. N. D. Anderson, Review of the Judical Process among the Barotse of Northern Rhodesia, TheModern Law Review,1955, pp.643-644; S. F. Nadel, Reason and Unreason in African Law, Africa: Journal of theInternational African Institute, Vol.26, No.2,1956, pp.160-173.
6E. Adamson Hoebel, Review: The Judicial Process among the Barotse of Northern Rhodesia, The University ofChicago Law Review, Vol.23, No.3,1956, pp.546-549; T. H. Marshall, Gluckman on the Judicial Process of theBarotse, The British Journal of Sociology, Vol.6, No.4,1955, pp.369-373.
1Ethel M. Albert, Review: The Judicial Process among the Barotse of Northern Rhodesia, AmericanAnthropologist, Vol.61,1959, pp.318-319.
2James G. March, Sociological Jurisprudence Revisited, A Review (More or Less) of Max Gluckman, StanfordLaw Review, Vol.8, No.3,1956, pp.499-534.
3Paul Bohannan, Justice and Judgment among the Tiv, Oxford University Press,1957, pp.5-6.
1到目前为止，提到“Tar”的只有两篇汉语文献。较早的是林端的《法律人类学简介》，不过他同样没有对其进行翻译，保留了这个音译符号。另外一篇文献是赵旭东的《秩序、过程与文化——西方法律人类学的发展及其问题》，赵旭东将“Tar”译为“塔”。参见《环球法律评论》2005年第5期，第567页。而《正义审判》的主要译者徐晶却认为，“榻”具有一块平面的含义，与提夫语的“Tar”所具有的地域性相吻合。笔者认为，虽然“塔”具有“土”字旁，但带有“木”字旁的“榻”似乎比“塔”更带有地域性的含义，因而此处赞同徐晶的观点。
2Paul Bohannan, Justice and Judgment among the Tiv, Oxford University Press,1957, pp.215-217.原文并无表格。
3Paul Bohannan, Justice and Judgment among the Tiv, Oxford University Press,1957, p.215.
1Paul Bohannan, Justice and Judgment among the Tiv, Oxford University Press,1957, p.2.
2“败坏榻”以及“修护榻”均参考的是林端的译法。参见林端：《法律人类学简介》，载林端：《儒家伦理与法律文化：社会学观点的探索》，中国政法大学出版社2002年版，第29页。
3Paul Bohannan, Justice and Judgment among the Tiv, Oxford University Press,1957, p.2.
1Paul Bohannan, Justice and Judgment among the Tiv, Oxford University Press,1957, pp.2-3.
2参见林端：《法律人类学简介》，载林端：《儒家伦理与法律文化：社会学观点的探索》，中国政法大学出版社2002年版，第29页。
1Paul Bohannan, Justice and Judgment among the Tiv, Oxford University Press,1957, p.7.
2Paul Bohannan, Justice and Judgment among the Tiv, Oxford University Press,1957, p.7-8.
1Sally Falk Moore, Comparative Studies, in Laura Nader ed., Law in Culture and Society, Aldine Publish,1969,p.341.
1Paul Bohannan, Justice and Judgment among the Tiv, Oxford University Press,1957, p.19.
2T. O. Elias, Book Reviews：Judgment and Justice among the Tiv, The International and Comparative LawQuarterly, Vol.8, No.1,1959, p.234.
1Paul Bohannan, Justice and Judgment among the Tiv, Oxford University Press,1957, p.vi.
2John M. Conley and William M. O’Barr, A Classic in Spite of Itself: The Cheyenne Way and the Case Method inLegal Anthropology, Law and Social Inquiry, Vol.29,2004, p.208.
3John M. Conley and William M. O’Barr, Legal Anthropology Comes Home: A Brief History of the EthnographicStudy of Law, Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review, Vol.27,1993, pp.51-54.
1Paul Bohannan, Justice and Judgment among the Tiv, Oxford University Press,1957, p.45.
2Paul Bohannan, Justice and Judgment among the Tiv, Oxford University Press,1957, p.85.
3John M. Conley and William M. O’Barr, Legal Anthropology Comes Home: A Brief History of the EthnographicStudy of Law, Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review, Vol.27,1993, p.52.
1Paul Bohannan, Justice and Judgment among the Tiv, Oxford University Press,1957, p.45.
2John M. Conley and William M. O’Barr, Legal Anthropology Comes Home: A Brief History of the EthnographicStudy of Law, Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review, Vol.27,1993, p.53.
3T. O. Elias, Book Reviews：Judgment and Justice among the Tiv, The International and Comparative LawQuarterly, Vol.8, No.1,1959, p.233.
4Paul Bohannan, Justice and Judgment among the Tiv, Oxford University Press,1957, p.8.
1T. O. Elias, Book Reviews：Judgment and Justice among the Tiv, The International and Comparative LawQuarterly, Vol.8, No.1,1959, p.234.
2Paul Bohannan, Gregory Bateson, David E. Hansen, Sidney Morgenbesser, Anthropological Theories, Science,New Series, Vol.129, No.3345,1959, pp.292+294+296+298+347-348.
3Sidney Morgenbesser, Role and Status of Anthropological Theories, Science, Vol.128,1958, p.285.
4Paul Bohannan, Anthropological Theories, Science, New Series, Vol.129, No.3345,1959, p.292.
1Paul Bohannan, Anthropological Theories, Science, New Series, Vol.129, No.3345,1959, p.292.
2Paul Bohannan, Anthropological Theories, Science, New Series, Vol.129, No.3345,1959, p.292.
1James M. Donovan, Legal Anthropology: An Introduction, Altamira Press,2008, p.166.
2Paul Bohannan, Anthropological Theories, Science, New Series, Vol.129, No.3345,1959, p.292.
1Paul Bohannan, Anthropological Theories, Science, New Series, Vol.129, No.3345，1959, p.294.
2Paul Bohannan, Anthropological Theories, Science, New Series, Vol.129, No.3345,1959, p.294.
1Paul Bohannan, Anthropological Theories, Science, New Series, Vol.129, No.3345,1959, p.294.
1Stanley Diamond ed., Culture in History: Essays in Honor of Paul Radin, Columbia University Press,1960.
2Max Gluckman, The Technical Vocabulary of Barotse Jurisprudence, American Anthropologist, New Series,Vol.61, No.5, Part1,1959, pp.743-759.
1Max Gluckman, The Technical Vocabulary of Barotse Jurisprudence, American Anthropologist, New Series,Vol.61, No.5, Part1,1959, p.754.
2Max Gluckman, The Technical Vocabulary of Barotse Jurisprudence, American Anthropologist, New Series,Vol.61, No.5, Part1,1959, p.754.
1Max Gluckman, The Technical Vocabulary of Barotse Jurisprudence, American Anthropologist, New Series,Vol.61, No.5, Part1,1959, p.755.
2Paul Bohannan, Justice and Judgment among the Tiv, Oxford University Press,1957, p.212.
3Max Gluckman, The Technical Vocabulary of Barotse Jurisprudence,American Anthropologist, New Series,Vol.61, No.5, Part1,1959, p.755.
1Max Gluckman, The Technical Vocabulary of Barotse Jurisprudence,American Anthropologist, New Series,Vol.61, No.5, Part1,1959, p.755.
2Max Gluckman, The Technical Vocabulary of Barotse Jurisprudence, American Anthropologist, New Series,Vol.61, No.5, Part1,1959, pp.758-759.
3Max Gluckman, The Technical Vocabulary of Barotse Jurisprudence, American Anthropologist, New Series,Vol.61, No.5, Part1,1959, p.759.
4穆尔认为格卢克曼的“身份”在使用上更接近于拉德克里夫·布朗的“社会地位”。参见Sally FalkMoore, Archaic Law and Modern Times on the Zambezi: Some Thoughts on Max Gluckman’s Interpretation of
1Max Gluckman, African Jurisprudence,Advancement of Science, Vol.18,1961, pp.439-454.
2Paul Bohannan, Justice and Judgment among the Tiv, Oxford University Press,1957, p.69.
3Max Gluckman, African Jurisprudence, Advancement of Science, Vol.18,1961, p.446.
4Max Gluckman, African Jurisprudence, Advancement of Science, Vol.18,1961, p.448.
1Max Gluckman, African Jurisprudence, Advancement of Science, Vol.18,1961, p.445.
2Max Gluckman, African Jurisprudence, Advancement of Science, Vol.18,1961, p.442
3Max Gluckman, African Jurisprudence, Advancement of Science, Vol.18,1961, p.444-446.
1Max Gluckman, African Jurisprudence, Advancement of Science, Vol.18,1961, p.453.
2Max Gluckman, Natural Justice in Africa, Natural Law Forum, Vol.9,1964, pp.25-44.
3Max Gluckman, Natural Justice in Africa, Natural Law Forum, Vol.9,1964, p.25.
4Paul Bohannan, Justice and Judgment among the Tiv, Oxford University Press,1957, p.50.
1Max Gluckman, Natural Justice in Africa, Natural Law Forum, Vol.9,1964, pp.42-43.
2Max Gluckman, Natural Justice in Africa, Natural Law Forum, Vol.9,1964, p.43.
3Max Gluckman, Natural Justice in Africa, Natural Law Forum, Vol.9,1964, p.43.
1[美]富勒：《法律的道德性》，郑戈译，商务印书馆2005年版，第3页。
2Max Gluckman, The Ideas in Barotse Jurisprudence, Yale University Press,1965, p.xv.
3Max Gluckman, The Ideas in Barotse Jurisprudence, Yale University Press,1965, p.xiii.
4Max Gluckman, The Ideas in Barotse Jurisprudence, Yale University Press,1965, p.xv.
1Max Gluckman, The Ideas in Barotse Jurisprudence, Yale University Press,1965, p.xvii.
2Annelise Riles, Representing In-Between:Law, Anthropology, and the Rhetoric of Interdisciplinarity, U. Ill. L.Rev.597,1994, p.638.
3Max Gluckman, The Ideas in Barotse Jurisprudence, Yale University Press,1965, p.xvi.
4Max Gluckman, The Ideas in Barotse Jurisprudence, Yale University Press,1965, p.xvi.
12Max Gluckman, The Ideas in Barotse Jurisprudence, Yale University Press,1965, pp.251-265.Max Gluckman, The Ideas in Barotse Jurisprudence, Yale University Press,1965, p.251.
3Max Gluckman, The Ideas in Barotse Jurisprudence, Yale University Press,1965, p.251.
4Paul Bohannan, Justice and Judgment among the Tiv, Oxford University Press,1957, p.69.
5Max Gluckman, The Ideas in Barotse Jurisprudence, Yale University Press,1965, p.251.
6Max Gluckman, The Ideas in Barotse Jurisprudence, Yale University Press,1965, p.252.
1Paul Bohannan, Justice and Judgment among the Tiv, Oxford University Press,1957, pp.119-120.
2Max Gluckman, The Ideas in Barotse Jurisprudence, Yale University Press,1965, p.253.
3Max Gluckman, The Ideas in Barotse Jurisprudence, Yale University Press,1965, p.254.
1Max Gluckman, The Ideas in Barotse Jurisprudence, Yale University Press,1965, p.254.
2Max Gluckman, The Ideas in Barotse Jurisprudence, Yale University Press,1965, p.254.
3Max Gluckman, African Jurisprudence, Advancement of Science, Vol.18,1961, p.453.
1Max Gluckman, The Ideas in Barotse Jurisprudence, Yale University Press,1965, p.254.
2Paul Bohannan, Anthropological Theories,Science, New Series, Vol.129, No.3345,1959, p.294.
3Paul Bohannan, Justice and Judgment among the Tiv, Oxford University Press,1957, p.212.
4Max Gluckman, The Ideas in Barotse Jurisprudence, Yale University Press,1965, p.257.
5Paul Bohannan, Justice and Judgment among the Tiv, Oxford University Press,1957, p.212.
1Max Gluckman, The Ideas in Barotse Jurisprudence, Yale University Press,1965, p.257.
2Max Gluckman, The Ideas in Barotse Jurisprudence, Yale University Press,1965, p.257.
3Max Gluckman, The Ideas in Barotse Jurisprudence, Yale University Press,1965, p.259.
4克钦是东南亚的一个民族，主要分布于缅甸北部的克钦邦、印度的阿萨密省，以及我国的云南省。
5Max Gluckman, The Ideas in Barotse Jurisprudence, Yale University Press,1965, p.261.
6Max Gluckman, The Ideas in Barotse Jurisprudence, Yale University Press,1965, pp.262-263.
1Max Gluckman, The Ideas in Barotse Jurisprudence, Yale University Press,1965, p.265.
2Max Gluckman, Reasonableness and Responsibility in the Law of Segmentary Societies, in Hilda Kuper and LeoKuper ed., African law: Adaptation and Development, University Califonia Press,1965, pp.120-146.
1Max Gluckman, Reasonableness and Responsibility in the Law of Segmentary Societies, in Hilda Kuper and LeoKuper ed., African law: Adaptation and Development, University Califonia Press,1965, p.142.
2Max Gluckman, The Judicial Process among the Barotse of Northern Rhodesia, Manchester University Press,1973, p.xxix.
3Max Gluckman, Reasonableness and Responsibility in the Law of Segmentary Societies, in Hilda Kuper and LeoKuper ed., African law: Adaptation and Development, University Califonia Press,1965, p.143.
4Max Gluckman, Reasonableness and Responsibility in the Law of Segmentary Societies, in Hilda Kuper and LeoKuper ed., African law: Adaptation and Development, University Califonia Press,1965, p.143.
1Max Gluckman, Politics, Law and Ritual in Tribal Society, Basil Blackwell,1965.对该书的中文解读参见夏希原：《马克斯·格卢克曼的社会人类学》，中央民族大学硕士学位论文，2010年，第五章，第56-64页。赵旭东：《部落社会中的政治、法律与仪式》，载《民俗研究》1999年第4期。
2Max Gluckman, Politics, Law and Ritual in Tribal Society, Basil Blackwell,1965, pp.169-215.
3Max Gluckman, Politics, Law and Ritual in Tribal Society, Basil Blackwell,1965, p.xxii.
4Max Gluckman, Politics, Law and Ritual in Tribal Society, Basil Blackwell,1965, p.183.
12Max Gluckman, Politics, Law and Ritual in Tribal Society, Basil Blackwell,1965, p.184..Raymond Firth, Max Gluckman,1911-1975, Proceedings of the British Academy, Vol.61,1975, p.494.
3Paul Bohannan ed., African Homicide and Suicide, Princeton University Press,1960.
4Paul Bohannan and George Dalton ed., Markets in Africa: Aight Subsistence Economies, NorthwesternUniversity Press,1962.
5Paul Bohannan, Social anthropology, Holt, Rinehart and Winston,1963.
1Paul Bohannan, Africa and Africans, Garden City, Natural History Press,1964.
2Paul Bohannan, Anthropology and the Law, in Sol Tax ed., Horizons of Anthropology, Aldine Pub. Co,1964.
3Laura Nader, The Anthropological Study of Law, American Anthropologist, New Series, Vol.67, No.6,1965,p.25.
4Paul Bohannan, The Differing Realms of the Law, American Anthropologist, New Series, Vol.67, No.6,1965,pp.33-42.
5Simon Roberts, Order and Dispute: An Introduction to Legal Anthropology, Penguin Books,1979, p.196.
6Paul Bohannan, The Differing Realms of the Law,American Anthropologist, Vol.67, No.6,1965, p.35.
1Paul Bohannan, The Differing Realms of the Law, American Anthropologist, Vol.67, No.6,1965, pp.35-36.
2Paul Bohannan, The Differing Realms of the Law,American Anthropologist, Vol.67, No.6,1965, p.38.
3Paul Bohannan, The Differing Realms of the Law, American Anthropologist, Vol.67, No.6,1965, p.38.
1Paul Bohannan, The Differing Realms of the Law, American Anthropologist, Vol.67, No.6,1965, p.41.
2Paul Bohannan, The Differing Realms of the Law, American Anthropologist, Vol.67, No.6,1965, p.42.
3Paul Bohannan, Justice and Judgment among the Tiv, Oxford University Press,1957, p.v.
1Max Gluckman, The Judicial Process among the Barotse of Northern Rhodesia, Manchester University Press,1967, p.xxiv.
2Max Gluckman, The Judicial Process among the Barotse of Northern Rhodesia, Manchester University Press,1967, p.376.
1Max Gluckman, The Judicial Process among the Barotse of Northern Rhodesia, Manchester University Press,1967, p.380.
2Victor Ayoub, Review: The Judicial Process in Two African Societies, in Morris Janowitz ed., CommunityPolitical Systems, International Yearbook of Political Behavior Research, Vol.Ⅰ, Free Press,1961, p.248.
3Max Gluckman, The Judicial Process among the Barotse of Northern Rhodesia, Manchester University Press,1967, p.381.
4Max Gluckman, The Judicial Process among the Barotse of Northern Rhodesia, Manchester University Press,1967, p.381.
5Max Gluckman, The Judicial Process among the Barotse of Northern Rhodesia, Manchester University Press,1967, p.381.
6Max Gluckman, The Judicial Process among the Barotse of Northern Rhodesia, Manchester University Press,1967, p.381.
1Max Gluckman, The Judicial Process among the Barotse of Northern Rhodesia, Manchester University Press,1967, p.404..
1Max Gluckman, The Judicial Process among the Barotse of Northern Rhodesia, Manchester University Press,1967, p.404.
2Paul Bohannan, Review: The Ideas in Barotse Jurisprudence, Kroeber Anthropogical Papers, Vol.36,1967,pp.94-101.
3Paul Bohannan, Review: The Ideas in Barotse Jurisprudence, Kroeber Anthropogical Papers, Vol.36,1967, p.95.
1弗朗兹贝尔曼斯坦纳(1909-1952)，捷克民族学家、评论家、诗人。二战期间，拜在埃文斯·普里查德门下学习人类学，1949年成为牛津大学社会人类学讲师。在其求学以及任教期间，对博安南产生了一定的影响。Franz Baermann Steiner,at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Franz_Baermann_Steiner, Sep.12,2011.
2Paul Bohannan, Review: The Ideas in Barotse Jurisprudence, Kroeber Anthropogical Papers, Vol.36,1967, p.96.
3Paul Bohannan, Review: The Ideas in Barotse Jurisprudence, Kroeber Anthropogical Papers, Vol.36,1967, p.96.
4Paul Bohannan, Review: The Ideas in Barotse Jurisprudence, Kroeber Anthropogical Papers, Vol.36,1967, p.97.
1《世界文化大纲》是美国人类学家乔治·皮特·默多克（George Peter Murdock）的代表作，出版于1963年。
2弗雷德里克·拉塞尔·埃根（Frederick Russell Eggan），美国人类学家，以英国社会人类学的方法研究美国的土著部落而闻名。
3沃德·古迪纳夫（Ward H. Goodenough），美国人类学家，乔治·皮特·默多克的学生，在亲属制度、语言人类学等领域有着突出的成就。
4Paul Bohannan, Review: The Ideas in Barotse Jurisprudence, Kroeber Anthropogical Papers, Vol.36,1967,pp.97-98.
1Paul Bohannan, Review: The Ideas in Barotse Jurisprudence,Kroeber Anthropogical Papers, Vol.36,1967, p.99.
2博安南认为“假设”（Postulates）是由霍贝尔在《原始人的法》中首次将其引入法律人类学的话语之中。Paul Bohannan, Review: The Ideas in Barotse Jurisprudence, Kroeber Anthropogical Papers, Vol.36,1967, p.99.
3Max Gluckman, The Judicial Process among the Barotse of Northern Rhodesia, Manchester University Press,1955, p.327.博安南将这段表述的页码错误地标记为“第318页”，不知何故。
4Paul Bohannan, Review: The Ideas in Barotse Jurisprudence, Kroeber Anthropogical Papers, Vol.36,1967, p.99.
1Paul Bohannan, Review: The Ideas in Barotse Jurisprudence, Kroeber Anthropogical Papers, Vol.36,1967,pp.99-100.
1Max Gluckman, The Judicial Process among the Barotse of Northern Rhodesia, Manchester University Press,1955, p.33.
2Paul Bohannan, Review: The Ideas in Barotse Jurisprudence, Kroeber Anthropogical Papers, Vol.36,1967,p.100.
3[美]西奥多·M.波特、多萝西·罗斯主编：《剑桥科学史·第七卷：现代社会科学》，第七卷翻译委员会译，大象出版社2008年版，第2页。
1Paul Bohannan, Law and legal Institutions, in David L. Sills ed., International Encyclopaedia of the SocialSciences, Vol.9,1968, pp.73-78.中文编译本参见[美]保罗·博安南：《法律与法律制度》（原江译），[英]马林诺夫斯基著：《原始社会的犯罪与习俗》，法律出版社2007年版，第119-131页。
1[美]保罗·博安南：《法律与法律制度》（原江译），[英]马林诺夫斯基著：《原始社会的犯罪与习俗》，法律出版社2007年版，第126-128页。
2Paul Bohannan, Justice and Judgment Among the Tiv, Waveland press,1968.
3Paul Bohannan, Justice and Judgment Among the Tiv, Waveland Press,1968, p.xv.
4Paul Bohannan, Justice and Judgment Among the Tiv, Waveland Press,1968, p.xv-xvi.
1Paul Bohannan, Justice and Judgment Among the Tiv, Waveland Press,1968, p.xvi.
2Paul Bohannan, Justice and Judgment Among the Tiv, Waveland Press,1968, p.xvi.
3Paul Bohannan, Justice and Judgment Among the Tiv, Waveland Press,1968, p.xvii.
1Paul Bohannan, Justice and Judgment Among the Tiv, Waveland Press,1968, p.xviii.
2Max Gluckman ed., Ideas and Procedures in African Customary Law, Oxford University Press,1969.
3A. N. Allot, A. L. Epstein and Max Gluckman, Introduction, in Max Gluckman ed., Ideas and Procedures inAfrican Customary Law, Oxford University Press,1969, p.20.
1Laura Nader ed., Law in Culture and Society, Aldine Publish,1969.
2Max Gluckman, Concepts in the Concepts in Comparative Study of Tribal Law, in Laura Nader ed., Law inCulture and Society, Aldine Publish,1969, pp.349-373.
3Paul Bohannan, Ethnography and Comparison in Legal Anthropology, in Laura Nader ed., Law in Culture and
4Society, Aldine Publish,1969, pp.401-418.Laura Nader, Preface, in Laura Nader ed., Law in Culture and Society, Aldine Publish,1969, p.ix; Sally FalkMoore,Introduction: Comparative Studies, in Laura Nader ed., Law in Culture and Society, Aldine Publish,1969,p.340.
5Laura Nader, The Anthropological Study of Law, American Anthropologist, New Series, Vol.67, No.6,1965,p.11.
1Max Gluckman, Concepts in the Concepts in the Comparative Study of Tribal Law, in Laura Nader ed., Law inCulture and Society, Aldine Publish,1969, p.351.
2Max Gluckman, Concepts in the Comparative Study of Tribal Law, in Laura Nader ed., Law in Culture andSociety, Aldine Publish,1969, p.353.
3Max Gluckman, Concepts in the Comparative Study of Tribal Law, in Laura Nader ed., Law in Culture andSociety, Aldine Publish,1969, p.353.
4Max Gluckman, Concepts in the Comparative Study of Tribal Law, in Laura Nader ed., Law in Culture andSociety, Aldine Publish,1969, p.354.
1Max Gluckman, Concepts in the Comparative Study of Tribal Law, in Laura Nader ed., Law in Culture andSociety, Aldine Publish,1969, p.354.
2参见[德]哈贝马斯：《认识与兴趣》，郭官义、李黎译，学林出版社1999年版，第200-201页。
1Max Gluckman, Concepts in the Comparative Study of Tribal Law, in Laura Nader ed., Law in Culture andSociety, Aldine Publish,1969, pp.354-366.
2Max Gluckman, Concepts in the Comparative Study of Tribal Law,in Laura Nader ed., Law in Culture andSociety, Aldine Publish,1969, p.357.
3Max Gluckman, Concepts in the Comparative Study of Tribal Law, in Laura Nader ed., Law in Culture andSociety, Aldine Publish,1969, p.364
4Max Gluckman, Concepts in the Comparative Study of Tribal Law, in Laura Nader ed., Law in Culture andSociety, Aldine Publish,1969, p.366.
1Max Gluckman, Concepts in the Comparative Study of Tribal Law, in Laura Nader ed., Law in Culture and
2Society, Aldine Publish,1969, p.373.Mary Douglas, L’homme Primitif et la loi, Zaire, Vol.x,1956, p.369.
3Paul Bohannan, Ethnography and Comparison in Legal Anthropology, in Laura Nader ed., Law in Culture andSociety, Aldine Publish,1969, p.401.
4Paul Bohannan, Ethnography and Comparison in Legal Anthropology, in Laura Nader ed., Law in Culture andSociety, Aldine Publish,1969, p.402.
1Paul Bohannan, Ethnography and Comparison in Legal Anthropology, in Laura Nader ed., Law in Culture andSociety, Aldine Publish,1969, p.401.
2Paul Bohannan, Ethnography and Comparison in Legal Anthropology, in Laura Nader ed., Law in Culture andSociety, Aldine Publish,1969, p.402.
1Paul Bohannan, Ethnography and Comparison in Legal Anthropology, in Laura Nader ed., Law in Culture andSociety, Aldine Publish,1969, p.403.
2Paul Bohannan, Ethnography and Comparison in Legal Anthropology, in Laura Nader ed., Law in Culture andSociety, Aldine Publish,1969, p.404.
1Paul Bohannan, Ethnography and Comparison in Legal Anthropology, in Laura Nader ed., Law in Culture andSociety, Aldine Publish,1969, p.404.
2Paul Bohannan, Ethnography and Comparison in Legal Anthropology, in Laura Nader ed., Law in Culture andSociety, Aldine Publish,1969, p.405.
1Paul Bohannan, Ethnography and Comparison in Legal Anthropology, in Laura Nader ed., Law in Culture andSociety, Aldine Publish,1969, p.406.
2Paul Bohannan, Ethnography and Comparison in Legal Anthropology, in Laura Nader ed., Law in Culture andSociety, Aldine Publish,1969, p.407.
1Paul Bohannan, Ethnography and Comparison in Legal Anthropology, in Laura Nader ed., Law in Culture andSociety, Aldine Publish,1969, p.407.
2Paul Bohannan, Ethnography and Comparison in Legal Anthropology, in Laura Nader ed., Law in Culture andSociety, Aldine Publish,1969, p.409.
1Paul Bohannan, Ethnography and Comparison in Legal Anthropology, in Laura Nader ed., Law in Culture andSociety, Aldine Publish,1969, p.410.
2Max Gluckman, Politics, Law and Ritual in Tribal Society, Basil Blackwell,1965, p.183..
3Paul Bohannan, Ethnography and Comparison in Legal Anthropology, in Laura Nader ed., Law in Culture andSociety, Aldine Publish,1969, p.415.
1Paul Bohannan, Ethnography and Comparison in Legal Anthropology, in Laura Nader ed., Law in Culture andSociety, Aldine Publish,1969, p.416.
2Paul Bohannan, Ethnography and Comparison in Legal Anthropology, in Laura Nader ed., Law in Culture and
3Society, Aldine Publish,1969, pp.416-417.Annelise Riles, Representing In-Between: Law,Anthropology, and the Rhetoric of Interdisciplinarity, U. Ill. L.Rev.597,1994, p.605; Richard L. Abel, A Comparative Theory of Dispute Institutions in Society,Law&SocietyReview, Vol.8, No.2,1974, p.304.
4Peter Sack, Law, Language, Culture: Verbal Acrobatics and Social Technology,41J. Legal Pluralism&Unofficial L,1998, p.16.
1Paul Bohannan, Ethnography and Comparison in Legal Anthropology, in Laura Nader ed., Law in Culture andSociety, Aldine Publish,1969, pp.417-418.
2Max Gluckman, The Ideas in Barotse Jurisprudence, Yale University Press,1972, p.xlii, n.1.
1Max Gluckman, The Ideas in Barotse Jurisprudence, Yale University Press,1972, p.xliii, n.6.
2Max Gluckman, The Ideas in Barotse Jurisprudence, Yale University Press,1972, p.xlv, n.19.
3“You'll get PIE IN THE SKY when you die!”出自美国流行作曲家、世界产业工人联盟的组织者乔·希尔
（Joe Hill）于1911年所作的一首著名歌曲《传教士与奴隶》。英语中著名的成语“天上掉馅饼”就出自这首歌。
4Max Gluckman, The Ideas in Barotse Jurisprudence, Yale University Press,1972, p.xliv.
1Max Gluckman, The Judicial Process among the Barotse of Northern Rhodesia, Manchester University Press,1973, p.xxvii.
2Max Gluckman, The Judicial Process among the Barotse of Northern Rhodesia, Manchester University Press,1973, p.xxvii.
3Max Gluckman, The Judicial Process among the Barotse of Northern Rhodesia, Manchester University Press,1973, pp.xxvii-xxviii.
1Max Gluckman, The Judicial Process among the Barotse of Northern Rhodesia, Manchester University Press,1973, p.xxxii..
2Paul Bohannan, Some Long-Since-Afterthoughts on Justice and Judgment, Newsl. Ass’n Pol.&Leg.Anthropology, Vol.4,1980, pp.4-6.
3Paul Bohannan, Some Long-Since-Afterthoughts on Justice and Judgment,Newsl. Ass’n Pol.&Leg.Anthropology, Vol.4,1980, p.5.
1Paul Bohannan, Some Long-Since-Afterthoughts on Justice and Judgment, Newsl. Assn Pol.&Leg.Anthropology, Vol.4,1980, p.5.
2“行为链”的概念，最早由荷兰动物行为学家与鸟类学家尼古拉斯·廷伯根（Nikolaas Tinbergen）提出，在生物学上是指“动物行为要素的强迫秩序”，后来经由人类学家艾德华·霍尔(Edward Hall)将其引入行为科学当中。
3Paul Bohannan, Some Long-Since-Afterthoughts on Justice and Judgment, Newsl. Ass’n Pol.&Leg.Anthropology, Vol.4,1980, pp.5-6.
4Paul Bohannan, Justice and Judgment among the Tiv, Waveland Press,1989, pp.v-vi.
1Paul Bohannan, Justice and Judgment among the Tiv, Waveland Press,1989, pp.vi-vii.
2Paul Bohannan, Justice and Judgment among the Tiv, Waveland Press,1989, p.vii.
3“Anemic”在英文中有“贫血”、“乏力”之意，博安南巧妙的在“Emic”前面加了否定前缀“An”，似乎是表示“文化客位”本身就是一种偏见。
1Paul Bohannan, Justice and Judgment among the Tiv, Waveland Press,1989, pp.vii-viii.
2Paul Bohannan, Justice and Judgment among the Tiv, Waveland Press,1989, pp.ix-x.
1Paul Bohannan, Justice and Judgment among the Tiv, Waveland Press,1989, p.xii.
2Marilyn Strathern, The Gender of the Gift: Problems with Women and Problems with Society in Melanesia,University of California Press,1988.
3Jane Collier Fishburne, Marriage and Inequality in Classless Societies, Standford University Press,1988.
4“搜寻地外文明计划（SETI）”致力于用射电望远镜等先进设备接收从宇宙中传来的电磁波，从中分析有规律的信号，希望借此发现外星文明。
5Paul Bohannan, Justice and Judgment among the Tiv, Waveland Press,1989, p.xiv.
1John L. Comaroff and Simon Roberts, Rules and Processes: The Cultural Logic of Dispute in an African Context,The University of Chicago Press,1981, p.252.
2Sally Falk Moore, Comparative Studies, in Laura Nader ed., Law in Culture and Society, Aldine Publish,1969,p.343.
3Paul Bohannan, Ethnography and Comparison in Legal Anthropology, in Laura Nader ed., Law in Culture andSociety, Aldine Publish,1969, p.416.
4Max Gluckman, The Judicial Process among the Barotse of Northern Rhodesia, Manchester University Press,1973, p.xxvi.
1John L. Comaroff and Simon Roberts, Rules and Processes: The Cultural Logic of Dispute in an African Context,The University of Chicago Press,1981, p.252.
2John M. Conley and William M. O’Barr, A Classic in Spite of Itself: The Cheyenne Way and the Case Method inLegal Anthropology, Law and Social Inquiry, Vol.29,2004, p.211.
3Annelise Riles, Representing In-Between: Law, Anthropology, and the Rhetoric of Interdisciplinarity, U. Ill. L.Rev.597,1994, p.604.
1Leopold J. Pospisil, Kapauku Papuans and Their Law, Yale University Publications in Anthropology,1958.
2Leopold J. Pospisil, The Kapauku Papuans of West New Guinea, Holt, Rinehart and Winston,1963, p.vii.
3Leopold J. Pospisil, Anthropology of Law, A Comparative Theory, Harper&Row,1971, p.xi.
4Leopold J. Pospisil, Kapauku Papuans and Their Law, Yale University Publications in Anthropology,1958,pp.208-230.
5波斯比斯尔特别强调，必须要使用“Obligatio”这个罗马法概念，不能混同于只标识义务的“Obligation”。 Leopold J. Pospisil, Kapauku Papuans and Their Law, Yale University Publications inAnthropology,1958, p.264.
6Leopold J. Pospisil, Kapauku Papuans and Their Law, Yale University Publications in Anthropology,1958,p.272.
7Leopold J. Pospisil, The Ethnology of Law, Addison-Wesley Module Publications,1972.该文第二章的部分内容已有中文译本，参见[美]波斯比斯尔：《法律不是什么》，胡昌明译，http://article.chinalawinfo.com/Article_Detail.asp?ArticleId=34649,（访问日期：2011年11月14日）。
1参见[美]波斯比斯尔：《法律不是什么》，胡昌明译，http://article.chinalawinfo.com/Article_Detail.asp?ArticleId=34649,（访问日期：2011年11月14日）。
2Joshua Zake, Approaches to the Study of Legal Systems in Nonliterate Societies, Ph.D. Dissertation,Northwestern University, Department of Anthropology, Evanston,1962.
3Joshua Zake, Approaches to the Study of Legal Systems in Nonliterate Societies, Ph.D. Dissertation,Northwestern University, Department of Anthropology, Evanston,1962, pp.68-88.
4Mark Ryan Goodale, Leopold Pospisil: A Critical Reappraisal, Journal of Legal Pluralism, Vol.40,1998, p.136.
5参见[美]波斯比斯尔：《法律不是什么》，胡昌明译，http://article.chinalawinfo.com/Article_Detail.asp?ArticleId=34649,（访问日期：2011年11月14日）。霍贝尔的这番表述出自E. Adamson Hoebel, Three Studies inAfrican Law, Stanford Law Review, Vol.13, No.2,1961,p.432.
1P. H. Gulliver, Neighbours and Networks: The Idiom of Kinship in Social Action Among the Ndendeuli ofTanzania, University of California Press,1971.
2P. H. Gulliver, Neighbours and Networks: The Idiom of Kinship in Social Action Among the Ndendeuli ofTanzania, University of California Press,1971, pp.244-246.
3Leopold J. Pospisil, The Ethnology of Law, Addison-Wesley module publications,1972, p.11.
1Simon Roberts, Law and the Study of Social Control in Small-Scale Societies, The Modern Law Review, Vol.39,No.6,1976, p.668.
2Laura Nader, The Anthropological Study of Law, American Anthropologist, New Series, Vol.67, No.6,1965,p.25.
3Laura Nader, The Anthropological Study of Law, American Anthropologist, New Series, Vol.67, No.6,1965,4p.11.Max Gluckman, Comparative Study of Tribal Law, in Laura Nader ed., Law in Culture and Society, AldinePublish,1969, p.352; Max Gluckman, The Ideas in Barotse Jurisprudence, Yale University Press,1972, p.xliii.
5Max Gluckman, The Ideas in Barotse Jurisprudence, Yale University Press,1972, p.xliii.
6Jan Vansina, A Traditional Legal System: The Kuba, in H. Kuper and L. Kuper ed., African Law: Adaptation andDevelopment, Univerisity of California Press,1965, p.117.
1H. Kuper and L. Kuper, Introduction, in H. Kuper and L. Kuper ed., African Law: Adaptation and Development,
2Univerisity of California Press,1965, p.5.Max Gluckman, The Ideas in Barotse Jurisprudence, Yale University Press,1972, p.xliii.
3Max Gluckman, The Judicial Process among the Barotse of Northern Rhodesia, Manchester University Press,1973, p.xxxvi.
4Annelise Riles, Representing In-Between: Law, Anthropology, and the Rhetoric of Interdisciplinarity, U. Ill. L.Rev.597,1994, p.604.
1Laura Nader, Introduction, in Laura Nader ed., Law in Culture and Society, Aldine Publish,1969, pp.7-8.
2Laura Nader, Introduction, in Laura Nader ed., Law in Culture and Society, Aldine Publish,1969, p.9.
3Laura Nader, Introduction, in Laura Nader ed., Law in Culture and Society, Aldine Publish,1969, p.2.
1Paul Bohannan, Justice and Judgment among the Tiv, Waveland Press,1989, pp.v-vi.
1Sally Falk Moore, Law and Anthropology, Biennial Review of Anthropology, Vol.6,1969, p.268.
2P. H. Gulliver, Social Control in an African Society: A Study of the Arusha: Agricultural Masai of NorthernTanganyika, Routledge&Kegan Paul,1963, p.ix.
3P. H. Gulliver, Social Control in an African Society: A Study of the Arusha: Agricultural Masai of NorthernTanganyika, Routledge&Kegan Paul,1963, p.x.
4P. H. Gulliver, Social Control in an African Society: A Study of the Arusha: Agricultural Masai of NorthernTanganyika, Routledge&Kegan Paul,1963, pp.299-300.
5P. H. Gulliver, Social Control in an African Society: A Study of the Arusha: Agricultural Masai of NorthernTanganyika, Routledge&Kegan Paul,1963, p.299.
1Sally Falk Moore, Certainties Undone: Fifty Turbulent Years of Legal Anthropology,1949-1999, The Journal ofthe Royal Anthropological Institute, Vol.7,2001, p.101.
2Ian Hammnett ed., Social Anthropology and Law, Acdemic Press,1977.
3Laura Nader, The Anthropological Study of Law, American Anthropologist, New Series, Vol.67, No.6,1965,p.23.
4Francis G. Snyder, Anthropology,Dispute Processes and Law: A Critical Introduction, British Journal of Law&Society, Vol.8, No.2,1981, p.145.
5Laura Nader, The Anthropological Study of Law, American Anthropologist, New Series, Vol.67, No.6,1965,p.23.
1Laura Nader, The Anthropological Study of Law, American Anthropologist, New Series, Vol.67, No.6,1965,p.26.
2Laura Nader and Harry F. Todd, ed., The Disputing Process: Law in Ten Societies, Columbia University Press,1978, preface.
3Klaus-Friedrich Koch, War and Peace in Jalemo: The Management of Conflict in Highland New Guinea,Harvard University Press,1974.
4June Starr, Dispute and Settlement in Rural Tarkey: An Ethnography of Law, Brill,1978.
5Cathie J. Witty, Mediation and Society: Conflict Management in Lebanon, Academic Press,1980.
6Barbara Yngvesson, Virtuous Citizens,Disruptive Subjects: Order and Complaint in a New England Court,Routledge,1993.
7Laura Nader and Harry F. Todd ed., The Disputing Process: Law in Ten Societies, Columbia University Press,1978, preface.除此之外，“伯克利乡村比较法律项目”还发表了一些重要论文，主要有Laura Nader andBarbara Yngvesson, On Studying the Ethnography of Law and its Consequences, in John Joseph Honigmann ed.,A Handbook of Social and Cultural Anthropology, RandMcNally,1973; June Starr and Jonathon Pool, The Impactof a Legal Revolution in Rural Turkey,8Law&Soc'y Rev.533,1974; June Starr and Barbara Yngvesson, Scarcityand Disputing: Zeroing-in on Compromise Decisions, Amercian Ethnologist, Vol.2,1975, p.553.
8Richard L. Abel, A Comparative Theory of Dispute Institutions in Society,8Law&Soc'y Rev,1974, p.217.
9Jane Fishburne Collier, Law and Social Change in Zinacantan, Stanford University Press,1973.
1David M. Engel, Code and Custom in a Thai Provincial Court, University of Arizona Press,1978.
2Carol J. Greenhouse, Nature Is to Culture as Praying Is to Suing: Legal Pluralism in an American Suburb,20J.Legal Pluralism&Unof-ficial L,1982.
3Francis G. Snyder, Anthropology, Dispute Processes and Law: A Critical Introduction, British Journal of Law&Society, Vol.8, No.2,1981, p.145.
45June Starr, Dispute and Settlement in Rural Tarkey: An Ethnography of Law, Brill,1978, p.256.Jane Fishburne Collier, Law and Social Change in Zinacantan,Stanford University Press,1973, p.244.
6Francis G. Snyder, Anthropology, Dispute Processes and Law: A Critical Introduction, British Journal of Law&Society,1981, Vol.8, No.2, p.145.
7John L. Comaroff and Simon Roberts, Rules and Processes: The Cultural Logic of Dispute in an African Context,The University of Chicago Press,1981, pp.13-14.
1参见王铭铭：《功能主义人类学的重新评估》，载《北京大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》1996年第2期，第
46页。
2参见[挪威]费雷德里克·巴特、[奥]安德烈·金格里希、[英]罗伯特·帕金、[美]西德尔·希尔弗曼：《人类学的四大传统——英国、德国、法国和美国的人类学》，高丙中等译，商务印书馆2008年版，第47页。值得一提的是，在这本合著中，撰写“英国人类学传统”的挪威学者费雷德里克·巴特（Fredrik Barth）就是格卢克曼的学生，曼城学派的代表学者之一。
3J. Van Velsen, The Extended-Case Method and Situational Analysis, and A. L. Epstein, The Case Method in theField of Law, both in A. L. Epstein ed., The Craft of Social Anthropology, Tavistock,1967, pp.130-131.
4Max Gluckman, Introduction, in Arnold Leonard Epstein ed., The Craft of Social Anthropology, Tavistock,1967,p.xx.
1Max Gluckman, The Judicial Process among the Barotse of Northern Rhodesia, Manchester University Press,1967, pp.371-372.
2Max Gluckman, The Judicial Process among the Barotse of Northern Rhodesia, Manchester University Press,1957, pp.25-29.
3Max Gluckman, The Judicial Process among the Barotse of Northern Rhodesia, Manchester University Press,1967, pp.370-371.本文第四章将会就非洲的独立对法律人类学研究的影响展开讨论。
4Max Gluckman, The Judicial Process among the Barotse of Northern Rhodesia, Manchester University Press,1967, p.372.
5Max Gluckman, The Judicial Process among the Barotse of Northern Rhodesia, Manchester University Press,1967, p.372.
1Paul Bohannan, Justice and Judgment Among the Tiv, Waveland press,1968, p.xviii.
2Thomas H. Maugh, Paul Bohannan,87：USC Anthropologist Researched Nigerian Culture and AmericanDivorce, at http://www.latimes.com/news/science/la-me-bohannan2aug02,1,1578759.story?coll=la-news-science,Nov.18,2011.
3Paul Bohannan, All the Happy Families: Exploring the Varieties of Family Life, McGraw-Hill,1985, p.50.
1Laura Nader, Introduction, in Laura Nader ed., Law in Culture and Society, Aldine Publish,1969, p.4.
2John M. Conley and William M. O’Barr, A Classic in Spite of Itself: The Cheyenne Way and the Case Method inLegal Anthropology, Law and Social Inquiry, Vol.29,2004, p.211.
3John M. Conley and William M. O’Barr, A Classic in Spite of Itself: The Cheyenne Way and the Case Method inLegal Anthropology, Law and Social Inquiry, Vol.29,2004, p.212.
1John M. Conley and William M. O’Barr, A Classic in Spite of Itself: The Cheyenne Way and the Case Method inLegal Anthropology, Law and Social Inquiry, Vol.29,2004, p.211.
1Leopold J. Pospisil, Anthropology of Law, A Comparative Theory, Harper&Row,1971, Leopold J. Pospisil,The Ethnology of Law, Addison-Wesley Module Publications,1972.
2Lloyd A. Fallers, Law Without Precedent: Legal Ideas in Action in the Courts of Colonial Busoga, University ofChicago Press,1969, pp.13-17.
3Ian Hamnett, Chieftainship and Legitimacy: An Anthropological Study of Executive Law in Lesotho, Routledge
4&Kegan Paul,1975, p.22.Simon Roberts, Review: Chieftainship and legitimacy: An Anthropological Study of Executive Law in Lesotho,Journal of African Law, Vol.25, No.1,1981, p.54.
5Chris Fuller, Legal Anthropology, Leagl Pluralism and Leagl Thought, Anthropology Today, Vol.10, No.3,1994,p.9.
6Ian Hamnett ed., Social Anthropology and Law, Academic Press,1977, p.8.
1Peter Sack, Law, Language, Culture: Verbal Acrobatics and Social Technology,41J. Legal Pluralism&Unofficial L,1998, p.34.
2Peter Sack, Law, Language, Culture: Verbal Acrobatics and Social Technology,41J. Legal Pluralism&Unofficial L,1998, p.20.
3Eugene Cotran, Restatement of African Law, Kenya Vol.1, The Law of Marriage and Divorce, University ofLondon School of Oriental and African Studies,1968; Eugene Cotran, Restatement of African Law, Kenya Vol.2,The Law of Succession, Sweet&Maxwell,1969; J. O. Ibik, Restatement of African Law, Malawi Vol.1, The Lawof Marriage and Divorce, Sweet&Maxwell,1970; J. O. Ibik, Restatement of African Law, Malawi Vol.2, TheLaw of Land, Succession, Movable Property, Agreements and Civil Wrongs, Sweet&Maxwell,1971.
4Simon Roberts, Law and the Study of Social Control in Small-Scale Societies, The Modern Law Review, Vol.39,No.6,1976, pp.671-672.
1据英国语言哲学家玛格丽特玛斯特曼(Margaret Masterman)统计，库恩在书中有至少二十一种“范式”的用法。参见[英]玛格丽特玛斯特曼：《范式的本质》（周寄中译），[英]伊姆雷拉卡托斯、艾兰马斯格雷夫主编《批判与知识的增长》，华夏出版社1987年版，第77-83页。
2库恩在1969年版的后记中重新梳理该词，确定了两种基本用法：“一方面，它代表着一个特定共同体的成员所共有的信念、价值、技术等构成的整体。另一方面，它指谓着那个整体的一种元素，即具体的谜题解答；把它们当作模型和范例，可以取代明确的规则以作为常规科学中其他谜题解答的基础。”参见[美]托马斯·库恩：《科学革命的结构》，金吾伦、胡新和译，北京大学出版社2003年版，第157页。
3参见[美]托马斯·库恩：《科学革命的结构》，金吾伦、胡新和译，北京大学出版社2003年版，第4页。
4参见[英]阿兰·巴纳德：《人类学历史与理论》，王建民、刘源、许丹等译，华夏出版社2006年版，第7-9页。
5John L. Comaroff and Simon Roberts, Rules and Processes: The Cultural Logic of Dispute in an African context,
6The University of Chicago Press,1981, p.4.Robert M. Hayden, Review: Rules, Processes, and Interpretations: Geertz, Comaroff, and Roberts, American BarFoundation Research Journal, Vol.9, No.2,1984, pp.469-471.
7Annelise Riles, Representing In-Between: Law, Anthropology, and the Rhetoric of Interdisciplinarity, U. Ill. L.Rev.597,1994; Sally Falk Moore, Certainties Undone: Fifty Turbulent Years of Legal Anthropology,1949-1999,The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, Vol.7,2001, pp.95-116.
1Peter Just, History, Power, Ideology, and Culture: Current Directions in the Anthropology of Law, Law&Society Review, Vol.26, No.2,1992, pp.373-412.
2John L. Comaroff and Simon Roberts, Rules and Processes: The Cultural Logic of Dispute in an African Context,The University of Chicago Press,1981, p.5
3John L. Comaroff and Simon Roberts, Rules and Processes: The Cultural Logic of Dispute in an African Context,The University of Chicago Press,1981, pp.11-17,252.
1John L. Comaroff and Simon Roberts, Rules and Processes: The Cultural Logic of Dispute in an African Context,The University of Chicago Press,1981, p.12.
2John L. Comaroff and Simon Roberts, Rules and Processes: The Cultural Logic of Dispute in an African Context,The University of Chicago Press,1981, pp.5-6.
3John L. Comaroff and Simon Roberts, Rules and Processes: The Cultural Logic of Dispute in an African Context,The University of Chicago Press,1981, pp.11-12.
4实际上，罗伯茨在同年的一篇书评中曾明确表示：“当然，这一时期也出现了像法勒斯的《没有先例的法律》和波斯比斯尔的《法律人类学》这样的作品，但社会科学整体上从规范性到解释性研究方法的转向对法律人类学有着强烈的影响。”Simon Roberts, Review: Chieftainship and Legitimacy:AnAnthropologicalStudy of Executive Law in Lesotho, Journal of African Law, Vol.25, No.1,1981, p.54.
5Robert M. Hayden, Review: Rules, Processes, and Interpretations: Geertz, Comaroff, and Roberts, American BarFoundation Research Journal, Vol.9, No.2,1984, pp.469-471.
1John L. Comaroff and Simon Roberts, Rules and Processes: The Cultural Logic of Dispute in an African Context,The University of Chicago Press,1981, pp.13-14.
2[美]克利尔：《北美社会人类学分支学科的兴起与衰落》（骆建建、袁同凯、郭立新等译），[美]古塔、弗格森主编：《人类学定位——田野科学的界限与基础》，华夏出版社2005年版，第122页。
3本文在导论中已经指出了这一问题。参见赵旭东：《秩序、过程与文化———西方法律人类学的发展及其问题》，载《环球法律评论》2005年第5期，第560页；陈柏峰：《法律民族志与当代中国法律社会学的使命》，载郑永流主编《法哲学与法社会学论丛》，第11期，北京大学出版社2007年版，第123页；李婉琳著：《社会变迁中的法律——穆尔法人类学思想研究》，中国人民公安大学出版社2011年版，第119-124页。
4Simon Roberts, Law and the Study of Social Control in Small-Scale Societies, The Modern Law Review, Vol.39,No.6,1976, p.674; Simon Roberts, Order and Dispute: An Introduction to Legal Anthropology, Penguin Books,1979, p.199.
5Robert M. Hayden, Review: Rules, Processes, and Interpretations: Geertz, Comaroff, and Roberts, American BarFoundation Research Journal, Vol.9, No.2,1984, pp.469-470.
1Paul Bohannan, The Differing Realms of the Law, American Anthropologist, Vol.67, Issue6,1965, p.35.
2Max Gluckman, The Judicial Process among the Barotse of Northern Rhodesia, Manchester University Press,1967, p.369.
3Max Gluckman, Politics, Law and Ritual in Tribal Society, Basil Blackwell,1965, p.xxii.
1朱晓阳：《第二周课的讨论问题》，http://groups.google.com/group/flrlx/browse_thread/thread/61fcd56e19a3cac6?hl=zh-CN#,（访问日期：2011年
11月20日）
2P. H. Gulliver, Introduction: Case Studies of Law in Non-Western Societies, in Laura Nader ed., Law in Cultureand Society, Aldine Publish,1969, p.17.
3与之相比，法国的法律人类学至少在1980年代仍然关注于法律的定义问题。佛朗西斯斯奈德在1981年的论文中曾提道：“与博安南的强调相一致的，但是却主要受早期的法国研究的启发，在巴黎的法律人类学实验室的带领下进行的许多研究，集中于阐明与法律和社会控制相关的‘民间’概念。十几年来直到最近，它的主要兴趣点就是对非洲土著观念进行仔细的语言学和语义学分析，在一些研究中，也包括与国家法律概念的比较。”仍然关注于法律的定义问题，这似乎也暗示了法国法律人类学历史上很可能没有出现过“格博之争”。Francis G. Snyder, Anthropology, Dispute Processes and Law: ACritical Introduction, BritishJournal of Law&Society, Vol.8, No.2,1981, p.157.
1参见何勤华著：《西方法学史》，中国政法大学出版社2000年版，第390-391页。
2即波斯比斯尔。引述的外文译名均保留作者的译法，下同。
1杨方泉：《法律人类学研究述评》，载《学术研究》2003年第2期，第58页。
2陈柏峰：《法律民族志与当代中国法律社会学的使命》，载郑永流主编：《法哲学与法社会学论丛》，第11期，北京大学出版社2007年版，第123页。
3尤陈俊：《困境及其超越：当代中国法学研究中的法律人类学》，载郑永流主编：《法哲学与法社会学论丛》，第11期，北京大学出版社2007年版，第98页。
1林端：《法律人类学简介》，载林端：《儒家伦理与法律文化：社会学观点的探索》，中国政法大学出版社2002年版，第21页。
1Francis G. Snyder, Anthropology,Dispute Processes and Law: A Critical Introduction, British Journal of Law&Society, Vol.8, No.2,1981, p.157.
2Simon Roberts, Law and the Study of Social Control in Small-Scale Societies, The Modern Law Review, Vol.39,No.6,1976, pp.663-679.
3Simon Roberts, Order and Dispute: An Introduction to Legal Anthropology, Penguin Books,1979.
1Untersuchungen，德语“研究”。
2Simon Roberts, Review: Chieftainship and Legitimacy: An Anthropological Study of Executive Law in Lesotho,Journal of African Law, Vol.25, No.1,1981, p.54.
1Simon Roberts, Law and the Study of Social Control in Small-Scale Societies, The Modern Law Review, Vol.39,No.6,1976, p.663.
2Simon Roberts, Law and the Study of Social Control in Small-Scale Societies, The Modern Law Review, Vol.39,No.6,1976, pp.663-679.
3Simon Roberts, Do We Need an Anthropology of Law? RAIN, No.25,1978, p.6.
1Simon Roberts, Do We Need an Anthropology of Law? RAIN, No.25,1978, p.7.
2Simon Roberts, Order and Dispute: An Introduction to Legal Anthropology, Penguin Books,1979, preface.
3Simon Roberts, Order and Dispute: An Introduction to Legal Anthropology, Penguin Books,1979, p.197.
4Simon Roberts, Order and Dispute: An Introduction to Legal Anthropology, Penguin Books,1979, p.196.
1Peter Just, History, Power, Ideology, and Culture: Current Directions in the Anthropology of Law, Law&Society Review, Vol.26, No.2,1992, p.386.
2John M. Conley and William M. O’Barr, Legal Anthropology Comes Home: A Brief History of the EthnographicStudy of Law, Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review, Vol.27,1993, p.50.
1Sally Falk Moore, Certainties Undone: Fifty Turbulent Years of Legal Anthropology,1949-1999, The Journal ofthe Royal Anthropological Institute, Vol.7,2001, p.95.
2Max Gluckman, Comparative Study of Tribal Law,in Laura Nader ed., Law in Culture and Society, AldinePublish,1969, p.350.
3参见[美]刘易斯·科塞：《理念人：一项社会学的考察》，郭方等译，中央编译出版社2004年版，第3-4页。
1参见[美]柯林斯：《哲学的社会学——一种全球的学术变迁理论》（上），吴琼等译，新华出版社2004年版，第68-69页。
2艺衡主编：《学派的天空——人类文明史上的思想群落》，广西师范大学出版社2009年版，第5-6页。
3[挪威]费雷德里克·巴特、[奥]安德烈·金格里希、[英]罗伯特·帕金、[美]西德尔·希尔弗曼：《人类学的四大传统——英国、德国、法国和美国的人类学》，高丙中等译，商务印书馆2008年版，第47页。
1Franz von Benda-Beckmann, Riding or Killing the Centaur? Reflections on the Identities of LegalAnthropology, International Journal of Law in Context, Vol.4, No.2,2008, p.89; Angela Bratton, FeministAnthropology, at http://www.indiana.edu/~wanthro/fem.htm, Nov.21,2011.
2穆尔的学习经历请参见李婉琳著：《社会变迁中的法律——穆尔法人类学思想研究》，中国人民公安大学出版社2011年版，第12-16页。
3E. Adamson Hoebel, Three Studies in African Law, Stanford Law Review, Vol.13, No.2,1961,pp.438-439.
4Max Gluckman, Reasonableness and Responsibility in the Law of segmentary societies, in Hilda Kuper and LeoKuper ed., African law: Adaptation and Development, University Califonia Press,1965, pp.126-137.
1Sally Falk Moore, Law and Anthropology, Biennial Review of Anthropology, Vol.6,1969, pp.253-255.
1Laura Nader, Introduction, in Laura Nader ed., Law in Culture and Society, Aldine Publish,1969, p.4.
2[美]威廉·亚当斯：《人类学的哲学之根》，黄剑波、李文建译，广西师范大学出版社2006年版，第1页。
3参见[美]西奥多·M.波特、多萝西·罗斯主编：《剑桥科学史·第七卷：现代社会科学》，第七卷翻译委员会译，大象出版社2008年版，第86-96页。
1John M. Conley and William M. O’Barr, A Classic in Spite of Itself: The Cheyenne Way and the Case Method inLegal Anthropology, Law and Social Inquiry, Vol.29,2004, p.210.
2Max Gluckman, The Judicial Process among the Barotse of Northern Rhodesia, Manchester University Press,1967, p.386.
3Paul Bohannan, Review: The Ideas in Barotse Jurisprudence, Kroeber Anthropogical Papers, Vol.36,1967, p.99.
4Max Gluckman, The Judicial Process among the Barotse of Northern Rhodesia, Manchester University Press,1955, p.230.
5Max Gluckman, In Reply, Stanford Law Review, Vol.8, No.4,1956, p.768.
1Sally Falk Moore, Archaic Law and Modern Times on the Zambezi: Some Thoughts on Max Gluckman’sInterpretation of Barotse Law, in P. H. Gulliver ed., Cross-Examinations Essay in Memory of Max Gluckman, E. J.Brill-Leiden,1978, p.56.
2Max Gluckman, The Judicial Process among the Barotse of Northern Rhodesia, Manchester University Press,1955, p.33.
1参见[美]西奥多·M.波特、多萝西·罗斯主编：《剑桥科学史·第七卷：现代社会科学》，第七卷翻译委员会译，大象出版社2008年版，第622页。
2[丹]克斯汀·海斯翠普主编：《他者的历史：社会人类学与历史制作》，贾士衡译，麦田出版社1998年版，第9页。
1M. J. Herskovits, Cultural Relativism: Perspectives in Cultural Pluralism, Random House,1973, p.15.
2Paul Bohannan, Ethnography and Comparison in Legal Anthropology, in Laura Nader ed., Law in Culture andSociety, Aldine Publish,1969, p.407.
1参见[英]梅因：《古代法》，沈景一译，商务印书馆1959年版，第97页。
2[英]马林诺夫斯基：《原始社会的犯罪与习俗》，原江译，法律出版社2007年版，第45页。
3“Representation”，通常译为“表征”、“表象”或“表述”，本是认知心理学中的一个核心概念，它在英美人类学中的意义和使用方法比较复杂，有着本体论、认识论以及方法论三个层次的意指，具体请参
1Simon Roberts, Against Legal Pluralism: Some Reflections of the Contemporary Enlargement of the LegalDomain,42J. Legal Pluralism&Unofficial L.95,1998, p.104.
2John M. Conley and William M. O'Barr, Just Words: Law, Language, and Power, University of Chicago Press,1998, p.99.
3参见朱晓阳：《人类学的表征危机与地志学转向》，载王铭铭主编:《中国人类学评论》2008年版，第175-176页。
4John M. Conley and William M. O'Barr, Just Words: Law, Language, and Power, University of Chicago Press,1998; Sally Engle Merry, Transnational Human Rights and Local Activism: Mapping the Middle, AmericanAnthropologist, Vol.108, Issue1,2006, pp.38–51; Richard Wilson ed., Human Rights: Culture and Context, PultoPress,1997.
1John M. Conley and William M. O'Barr, Just Words: Law, Language, and Power, University of Chicago Press,1998, p.99.
2Max Gluckman, The Ideas in Barotse Jurisprudence, Yale University Press,1965, pp.253-264; Max Gluckman,Reasonableness and Responsibility in the Law of Segmentary Societies, in Hilda Kuper and Leo Kuper ed.,African law: Adaptation and Development, University Califonia Press,1965, p.143.
1John M. Conley and William M. O'Barr, Just Words: Law, Language, and Power, University of Chicago Press,1998, p.99.
23Max Gluckman, African Jurisprudence, Advancement of Science, Vol.18,1961, p.446.Max Gluckman, The Ideas in Barotse Jurisprudence, Yale University Press,1965, p.251.
4Max Gluckman, The Ideas in Barotse Jurisprudence, Yale University Press,1965, p.253.
5Max Gluckman, The Ideas in Barotse Jurisprudence, Yale University Press,1965, p.254.
6Sally Falk Moore, Certainties Undone: Fifty Turbulent Years of Legal Anthropology,1949-1999, The Journal ofthe Royal Anthropological Institute, Vol.7,2001, p.110.
1参见[美]埃尔曼·R.瑟维斯：《人类学百年争论：1860-1960》，贺志雄等译，云南大学出版社1997年版，第319页。
23Radcliffe-Brown, Primitive Law,9Encyclopaedia of the Social Sciences,1933, p.202.Radcliffe-Brown, Primitive Law,9Encyclopaedia of the Social Sciences,1933, p.202.
4[英]埃文思·普里查德：《努尔人：对尼罗河畔一个人群的生活方式和政治制度的描述》，储建芳、阎书昌、赵旭东译，华夏出版社2001年版，第186页。
5参见朱晓阳：《人类学的表征危机与地志学转向》，载王铭铭主编：《中国人类学评论》，第6辑，世界图书出版公司2008年版，第174页。
1E. E. Evans-Pritchard, Witchcraft, Oracles, and Magic among the Azande, Oxford University Press,1937.中文译本请参见[英]埃文思·普里查德：《阿赞德人的巫术、神谕和魔法》，覃俐俐译，商务印书馆2010年版。
2参见[英]埃文思-普里查德：《阿赞德人的巫术、神谕和魔法》，覃俐俐译，商务印书馆2010年版，第52-53页。
3参见邱慧：《非理性还是不同的合理性——阿赞德人的案例》，载《自然辨证法研究》2004年第5期，第36-37页。
4[英]埃文思-普里查德：《阿赞德人的巫术、神谕和魔法》，覃俐俐译，商务印书馆2010年版，第55页。
5参见黄应贵著：《返景入深林：人类学的关照、理论与实践》，商务印书馆2010年版，第273页。
1参见黄应贵著：《返景入深林：人类学的关照、理论与实践》，商务印书馆2010年版，第279-280页。
2Peter Winch, Understanding a Primitive Society, American Philosophical Quarterly, Vol.1, No.4,1964, p.315.
3参见朱晓阳：《人类学的表征危机与地志学转向》，载王铭铭主编：《中国人类学评论》2008年版，第174页。
1参见邱慧：《非理性还是不同的合理性——阿赞德人的案例》，载《自然辨证法研究》2004年第5期，第36-39页。
2参见黄应贵著：《返景入深林：人类学的关照、理论与实践》，商务印书馆2010年版，第279-280页。
1Max Gluckman, The Judicial Process among the Barotse of Northern Rhodesia, Manchester University Press,1967, p.369.
1Max Gluckman, The Ideas in Barotse Jurisprudence, Yale University Press,1965, p.24.
2Max Gluckman, The Ideas in Barotse Jurisprudence, Yale University Press,1965, p.xiv.
3Max Gluckman, The Ideas in Barotse Jurisprudence, Yale University Press,1965, p.xiv.
4Max Gluckman, The Ideas in Barotse Jurisprudence, Yale University Press,1972, p.xxii.
5Sally Falk Moore, Law and Anthropology, Biennial Review of Anthropology, Vol.6,1969, pp.267-268.
1Max Gluckman, The Ideas in Barotse Jurisprudence, Yale University Press,1965, p.265.
2Paul Bohannan, Justice and Judgment among the Tiv, Waveland Press,1989, pp.vii-viii.
1Paul Bohannan, Social anthropology, Holt, Rinehart and Winston,1963, p.46.
2Paul Bohannan, Ethnography and Comparison in Legal Anthropology, in Laura Nader ed., Law in Culture andSociety, Aldine Publish,1969, p.406.
3Paul Bohannan, Ethnography and Comparison in Legal Anthropology, in Laura Nader ed., Law in Culture andSociety, Aldine Publish,1969, p.407.
4Paul Bohannan, Review: The Ideas in Barotse Jurisprudence, Kroeber Anthropogical Papers, Vol.36,1967,pp.99-100.
1John M. Conley and William M. O’Barr, Legal Anthropology Comes Home: A Brief History of the EthnographicStudy of Law, Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review, Vol.27,1993, p.45
1Malinowski, Coral Gardens and Their Magic, E. P. Dutton edition,1961, p.25.
2Laura Nader, Introduction, in Laura Nader ed., Law in Culture and Society, Aldine Publish,1969, p.4.
3Laura Nader, Introduction, in Laura Nader ed., Law in Culture and Society, Aldine Publish,1969, p.4.
1Laura Nader, Introduction, in Laura Nader ed., Law in Culture and Society, Aldine Publish,1969, pp.4-5.
2[美]克利福德·吉尔茨：《地方性知识：阐释人类学论文集》，王海龙、张家瑄译，中央编译出版社2004年版。
3格尔茨特别强调，“这样一种研究进路，不是法律的人类学家或法律人类学家的方法，而是文化人类学家的研究方法”，参见[美]克利福德·吉尔茨：《地方知识：事实与法律的比较透视》（邓正来译），梁治平主编：《法律的文化解释》，生活·读书·新知三联书店1998年版，第89页。
4参见[美]克利福德·吉尔茨：《地方知识：事实与法律的比较透视》（邓正来译），梁治平主编：《法律的文化解释》，生活·读书·新知三联书店1998年版，第84-89页。
1参见张静：《“雷格瑞事件”引出的知识论问题》，载《清华社会学评论》，鹭江出版社2000年版，第108页。
2[美]克利福德·吉尔茨：《地方知识：事实与法律的比较透视》（邓正来译），梁治平主编：《法律的文化解释》，生活·读书·新知三联书店1998年版，第75页。
3参见张静《：“雷格瑞事件”引出的知识论问题》，载《清华社会学评论》，鹭江出版社2000年版，第110-111页。
4Michele Stephen, A'aisa's Gift, A Study of Magic and the Self, University of California Press,1995, p.23.
5Alan Jones, Mekeo chiefs and Sorcerers: Metaphor, Ideology and Practice, Oceania, Vol.77, No.3,2007, p.287.
1Bergendorff Steen, Contextual Translation--Concepts and Practices among the Mekeo of Papua New Guinea,Oceania, Vol.79, No.3,2009, p.225.
2Bergendorff Steen, Contextual Translation--Concepts and Practices among the Mekeo of Papua New Guinea,Oceania, Vol.79, No.3,2009, p.226.
1参见高丙中：译序，载[英]马凌诺斯基：《西太平洋的航海者》，梁永佳、李绍明译，华夏出版社2002年版，第2页。
1参见黄应贵著：《返景入深林：人类学的关照、理论与实践》，商务印书馆2010年版，第198-199页。
2参见郑少雄：《经济人类学的历史转向》，载《中国社会科学报》2010年12月14日，第2版。
3参见黄应贵著：《返景入深林：人类学的关照、理论与实践》，商务印书馆2010年版，第200-201页。
4Karl Polanyi, Conrad M. Arensberg and Harry W. Pearson ed., Trade and Market in the Early Empires:Economies in History and Theory, Free Press,1957.
5参见黄应贵著：《返景入深林：人类学的关照、理论与实践》，商务印书馆2010年版，第202-203页。
1Richard R. Wilk and Lisa Cliggett, Economies and Cultures: Foundations of Economic Anthropology,Westview Press,2007, p.3.
2参见黄应贵著：《返景入深林：人类学的关照、理论与实践》，商务印书馆2010年版，第203页。
3参见黄应贵著：《Tiv与Siane经济：经济人类学的实质论派与形式论派之比较》，载《‘中央研究院’民族学研究所集刊》1974年第35期，第145-162页。
1郑少雄：《经济人类学的历史转向》，载《中国社会科学报》2010年12月14日，第2版。
2Chris Fuller, Legal Anthropology, Leagl Pluralism and Leagl Thought, Anthropology Today, Vol.10, No.3,1994,p.9.
3Peter G. Sack and Jonathan Aleck ed., Law and Anthropology: The International Library of Essays in Law andLegal Theory: Legal Cultures, New York University Press,1992, p.xx.
1Max Gluckman, The Judicial Process among the Barotse of Northern Rhodesia, Manchester University Press,1955, p.xix.
2Paul Bohannan, Justice and Judgment among the Tiv, Oxford University Press,1957, p.v.
3参见郑戈：《法学是一门社会科学吗?——试论“法律科学”的属性及其研究方法》，载《北大法律评论》1998年第1期，第4页。
4Richard L. Abel, A Comparative Theory of Dispute Institutions in Society, Law&Society Review, Vol.8, No.2,1994, p.305.
5Sally Falk Moore, Comparative Studies, in Laura Nader ed., Law in Culture and Society, Aldine Publish,1969,p.339.
1Max Gluckman, The Judicial Process among the Barotse of Northern Rhodesia, Manchester University Press,1955, p.xix.
2Max Gluckman, The Judicial Process among the Barotse of Northern Rhodesia, Manchester University Press,1955, xix-xx.
1Max Gluckman, The Judicial Process among the Barotse of Northern Rhodesia, Manchester University Press,1955, xxi.
2A. L. Goodhart, Foreword, in Max Gluckman, The Judicial Process among the Barotse of Northern Rhodesia,Manchester University Press,1955, pp.xv-xvi.
1Max Gluckman, The Judicial Process among the Barotse of Northern Rhodesia, Manchester University Press,1955, p.xix.
2Max Gluckman, The Ideas in Barotse Jurisprudence, Yale University Press,1972, p.xxii.
1Sally Falk Moore, Archaic Law and Modern Times on the Zambezi: Some Thoughts on Max Gluckman’sInterpretation of Barotse Law, in P. H. Gulliver ed., Cross-Examinations Essay in Memory of Max Gluckman, E. J.Brill-Leiden,1978, p.55.
2Annelise Riles, Representing In-Between: Law, Anthropology, and the Rhetoric of Interdisciplinarity, U. Ill. L.Rev.597,1994, p.638.
3Max Gluckman, The Ideas in Barotse Jurisprudence, Yale University Press,1965, pp.xiii-xiv.
4Paul Bohannan, Justice and Judgment among the Tiv, Oxford University Press,1957, p.v.
1Paul Bohannan, Justice and Judgment among the Tiv, Oxford University Press,1957, p.v.
2T. O. Elias, Book Reviews: Judgment and Justice among the Tiv, The International and Comparative LawQuarterly, Vol.8, No.1,1959, p.234.
3Peter Sack, Law, Language, Culture: Verbal Acrobatics and Social Technology,41J. Legal Pluralism&Unofficial L,1998, p.20.
1Paul Bohannan, Review: The Ideas in Barotse Jurisprudence, Kroeber Anthropogical Papers, Vol.36,1967,p.101.
2[美]西奥多·M.波特、多萝西·罗斯主编:《剑桥科学史·第七卷：现代社会科学》，第七卷翻译委员会译，大象出版社2008年版，第215页。
1参见[美]克利尔：《北美社会人类学分支学科的兴起与衰落》(骆建建、袁同凯、郭立新等译)，[美]古塔、弗格森主编：《人类学定位——田野科学的界限与基础》，华夏出版社2005年版，第132页。
2参见[美]克利尔：《北美社会人类学分支学科的兴起与衰落》(骆建建、袁同凯、郭立新等译)，[美]古塔、弗格森主编：《人类学定位——田野科学的界限与基础》，华夏出版社2005年版，第125页。
3参见郑戈：《法学是一门社会科学吗?——试论“法律科学”的属性及其研究方法》，载《北大法律评论》1998年第1期，第4页。
1Laura Nader, The Anthropological Study of Law, American Anthropologist, New Series, Vol.67, No.6,1965, p.3.
2Francis G. Snyder, Anthropology, Dispute Processes and Law: A Critical Introduction, British Journal of Law&Society, Vol.8, No.2,1981, p.152.
3参见[美]克利尔：《北美社会人类学分支学科的兴起与衰落》（骆建建、袁同凯、郭立新等译），[美]古塔、弗格森主编：《人类学定位——田野科学的界限与基础》，华夏出版社2005年版，第121页。
1Francis G. Snyder, Anthropology, Dispute Processes and Law: A Critical Introduction, British Journal of Law&Society, Vol.8, No.2,1981, p.146.
2Laura Nader and Harry F. Todd ed., The Disputing Process: Law in Ten Societies, Columbia University Press,1978, pp.14-15.
3Barbara Yngvesson, Virtuous Citizens, Disruptive Subjects: Order and Complaint in a New England Court,Routledge,1993; June Starr, Dispute and Settlement in Rural Tarkey: An Ethnography of Law, Brill,1978.
4Carol J. Greenhouse, Just in Time: Temporality and the Cultural Legitimation of Law,98Yale L. J.1631,1989,p.1631.
5罗得西亚与尼亚萨兰联邦，又称中非联邦。是英国政府为了平息当地逐渐高涨的独立声浪，将罗得西亚三地合并，于1953年8月1日成立的一个自治领。目的是能够在当地的黑人民族主义者及位居统治地位的白人之间，采取折衷方式来建立一个永久性的政治实体。参见陈启能主编：《大英帝国从殖民地撤退前后》，方志出版社2007年版，第164-166页。
6Max Gluckman, The Judicial Process among the Barotse of Northern Rhodesia, Manchester University Press,1967, p.370.
1Max Gluckman, The Judicial Process among the Barotse of Northern Rhodesia, Manchester University Press,1967, pp.374-375.
2Laura Nader, The Anthropological Study of Law, American Anthropologist, New Series, Vol.67, No.6,1965,p.14.
3参见[美]克利尔：《北美社会人类学分支学科的兴起与衰落》(骆建建、袁同凯、郭立新等译)，[美]古塔、弗格森主编：《人类学定位——田野科学的界限与基础》，华夏出版社2005年版，第121页。
1John M. Conley and William M. O’Barr, Legal Anthropology Comes Home: A Brief History of the EthnographicStudy of Law, Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review, Vol.27,1993, p.56.
2Francis G. Snyder, Anthropology, Dispute Processes and Law: A Critical Introduction, British Journal of Law&
3Society, Vol.8,1981, p.163.Joan Vincent, Anthropology and Politics: Visions, Traditions, and Trends, University of Arizona Press,1990,p.375.
4Simon Roberts, Against Legal Pluralism: Some Reflections of the Contemporary Enlargement of the LegalDomain,42J. Legal Pluralism&Unofficial L.95,1998, p.97.关于对法律多元中的人类学与法学的关系之评价请参见：Francis G. Snyder,Anthropology, Dispute Processes and Law:ACritical Introduction, British Journal ofLaw&Society, Vol.8,1981, p.157; Chris Fuller, Legal Anthropology, Leagl Pluralism and Leagl Thought,Anthropology Today, Vol.10, No.3,1994, p.10; Sally Engle Merry, Anthropology, Law, and Transnational
5Processes, Annual Review of Anthropology, Vol.21,1992, pp.357-79.Francis G. Snyder, Anthropology, Dispute Processes and Law: A Critical Introduction, British Journal of Law&Society, Vol.8,1981, p.149.
6Francis G. Snyder, Anthropology, Dispute Processes and Law: A Critical Introduction, British Journal of Law&Society, Vol.8,1981, p.142.
7Simon Roberts, Do We Need an Anthropology of Law? RAIN, No.25,1978, p.4.
1Chris Fuller, Legal Anthropology, Leagl Pluralism and Leagl Thought, Anthropology Today, Vol.10, No.3,1994,p.9.
2Chris Fuller, Legal Anthropology, Leagl Pluralism and Leagl Thought, Anthropology Today, Vol.10, No.3,1994,p.10.
3斯奈德观察到：可以比较一下美国的《法律和社会评论》和英国的《法律和社会杂志》就能看出这种区别。再者，人类学者或是对人类学方法颇感兴趣的学者供职于美国主流法学院的人数超过了10人。1971年11月，耶鲁大学法学院的“法律和现代化”项目举办了为期两天的研讨会——“法律人类学与法律的比较社会研究”，大多数论文都是由人类学家提交，但是超过一半的与会学者却都是专业法学家。加利福尼亚大学伯克利分校的人类学家劳拉纳德一直稳定地保持着与博尔特法学院的关系，同时也为哈佛大学法学院主持的“非正式替代法院”工作，还是威斯康星法学院正在进行的纠纷程序项目的主要负责人。当然，这些关联并非都出自人类学家，而且除了这些国际性法学院之外的情况则不能过分强调。Francis G. Snyder,Anthropology, Dispute Processes and Law: A Critical Introduction, British Journal of Law&Society, Vol.8,1981,p.164.
1Annelise Riles, Representing In-Between: Law, Anthropology, and the Rhetoric of Interdisciplinarity, U. Ill. L.Rev.597,1994, p.651.
2Chris Fuller, Legal Anthropology, Leagl Pluralism and Leagl Thought, Anthropology Today, Vol.10, No.3,1994,p.10.
3Francis G. Snyder, Anthropology, Dispute Processes and Law: A Critical Introduction, British Journal of Law&Society, Vol.8,1981, p.165.
4Franz von Benda-Beckmann, Riding or Killing the Centaur? Reflections on the Identities of LegalAnthropology, International Journal of Law in Context, Vol.4, No.2,2008, pp.101-102.
12Paul Bohannan, Social Anthropology, Holt, Rinehart and Winston,1963, p.284.Francis G. Snyder, Anthropology, Dispute Processes and Law: A Critical Introduction, British Journal of Law&Society, Vol.8,1981, p.142.经济学和法学的交叉以及心理学和法学的交叉参见该杂志“法律与其他学科关系”系列的前两篇，Veljanovski, The Economic Approach to Law: ACritical Introduction, British Journal of Lawand Society, Vol.7,1980, pp.158-193; Lloyd Bostock, Psychology and the Law: A Critical Review of Research andPractice, British Journal of Law and Society, Vol.8,1981, pp.1-28.
1Cornelis van Vollenhoven, at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cornelis_van_Vollenhoven, Dec.7.2011.
2Norbert Rouland, Legal Anthropology, translated by Philippe G. Planel, The Athlone Press,1994, p.86
1Cornelis van Vollenhoven, Miskenningen van het adatrecht, Brill,1909.
2Franz von Benda-Beckmann, Riding or Killing the Centaur? Reflections on the Identities of LegalAnthropology, International Journal of Law in Context, Vol.4, No.2,2008, p.90.
3Norbert Rouland, Legal Anthropology, translated by Philippe G. Planel, The Athlone Press,1994, p.86
4乔治古尔维奇（1894-1965），法国社会学家、法学家，代表作有《社会时间的频谱》。
5Norbert Rouland, Legal Anthropology, translated by Philippe G. Planel, The Athlone Press,1994, p.86.
6Johan Frederik Holleman, Shona Customary Law, With reference to Kinship, Marriage, the Family and the
7Estate, Oxford University Press,1952.Johan Frederik Holleman, Trouble-cases and Trouble-less Cases in the Study of Customary Law and LegalReform, Law&Society Review, Vol.7,1973, pp.589-607.
8Franz von Benda-Beckmann and Han F. Vermeulen, Adat Law and Legal Anthropology: In Memoriam JohanFrederik(Hans) Holleman (18December1915-28August2001): With a Bibliography, Journal of Legal Pluralism,Vol.46,2001, p.104.
1Wim M. J. van Binsbergen, Introduction: The Dynamics of Power and the Rule of Law in Africa and Beyond, inWim M. J. van Binsbergen ed., The Dynamics of Power and the Rule of Law: Essays on Africa and Beyond; inHonour of Emile Adriaan B. van Rouveroy van Nieuwaal, Lit-Verlag,2003, p.13.
2Wim M. J. van Binsbergen, Introduction: The Dynamics of Power and the Rule of Law in Africa and Beyond, inWim M. J. van Binsbergen ed., The Dynamics of Power and the Rule of Law: Essays on Africa and Beyond; inHonour of Emile Adriaan B. van Rouveroy van Nieuwaal, Lit-Verlag,2003, p.15.
1Norbert Rouland, Legal Anthropology, translated by Philippe G. Planel, The Athlone Press,1994, p.86.
2Norbert Rouland, Legal Anthropology, translated by Philippe G.Planel, The Athlone Press,1994, p.87.
3Franz von Benda-Beckmann and Han F. Vermeulen, Adat Law and Legal Anthropology: In Memoriam JohanFrederik(Hans) Holleman (18December1915-28August2001); With a Bibliography, Journal of Legal Pluralism,Vol.46,2001, pp.103-114.
1Franz von Benda-Beckmann, Riding or Killing the Centaur? Reflections on the Identities of LegalAnthropology, International Journal of Law in Context, Vol.4, No.2,2008, p.208.
2参见[美]克利福德·吉尔茨：《地方知识：事实与法律的比较透视》（邓正来译），梁治平主编：《法律的文化解释》，生活·读书·新知三联书店1998年版，第76页。邓正来教授将“Centaur”译为“半人半马”，但笔者以为“人头马”更为简练和贴切。
1参见[德]黑格尔：《精神现象学》（上卷），贺麟、王玖兴译，商务印书馆1979年版，第12页。
2参见[德]埃德蒙德·胡塞尔：《笛卡尔式的沉思》，张廷国译，中国城市出版社2001年版，第127-129页。
3[法]萨特：《存在与虚无》，陈宣良译，生活·读书·新知三联书店1987年版，第314页。
4[法]萨特：《存在与虚无》，陈宣良译，生活·读书·新知三联书店1987年版，第317页。
5[法]萨特：《存在与虚无》，陈宣良译，生活·读书·新知三联书店1987年版，第317页。
6[法]萨特：《存在与虚无》，陈宣良译，生活·读书·新知三联书店1987年版，第325页。
7参见杜小真著：《存在和自由的重负：解读萨特<存在与虚无>》，山东人民出版社2002年版，第203页。
1[法]萨特：《存在与虚无》，陈宣良译，生活·读书·新知三联书店1987年版，第336页。
2中共中央马克思恩格斯列宁斯大林著作编译局编：《马克思恩格斯选集》，第21卷，人民出版社1979年版，第454页。
3林端：《韦伯法律社会学的两大面向》，载林端：《儒家伦理与法律文化：社会学观点的探索》，中国政法大学出版社2002年版，第48-50页。
4Annelise Riles, Representing In-Between: Law, Anthropology, and the Rhetoric of Interdisciplinarity, U. Ill. L.Rev.597,1994, p.601.
1黄应贵著：《返景入深林：人类学的关照、理论与实践》，商务印书馆2010年版，第23页。
2[美]克利尔：《北美社会人类学分支学科的兴起与衰落》（骆建建、袁同凯、郭立新等译），[美]古塔、弗格森主编：《人类学定位——田野科学的界限与基础》，华夏出版社2005年版，第125页。
3黄应贵著：《返景入深林：人类学的关照、理论与实践》，商务印书馆2010年版，第23页。
1参见王恒著：《时间性：自身与他者——从胡塞尔、海德格尔到列维纳斯》，江苏人民出版社2006年版，第185-186页。
2Francis G. Snyder, Anthropology, Dispute Processes and Law: A Critical Introduction, British Journal of Law&Society, Vol.8, No.2,1981, p.163.
3Paul Bohannan, Ethnography and Comparison in Legal Anthropology, in Laura Nader ed., Law in Culture andSociety, Aldine Publish,1969, p.415.
1、李婉琳著：《社会变迁中的法律——穆尔法人类学思想研究》，中国人民公安大学出版社2011年版。
2、[美]霍贝尔：《原始人的法》，严存生等译，贵州人民出版社1992年版。
3、[英]马林诺夫斯基：《原始社会的犯罪与习俗》，原江译，云南人民出版社2002年版。
4、孙红旗著：《殖民主义与非洲专论》，中国矿业大学出版社2008年版。
5、高岱、郑家馨著：《殖民主义史·总论卷》，北京大学出版社2003年版。
6、[美]埃里克·吉尔伯特、乔纳森·雷诺兹：《非洲史》，黄磷译，海南出版社2007年版。
7、[挪威]费雷德里克·巴特、[奥]安德烈·金格里希、[英]罗伯特·帕金、[美]西德尔·希尔弗曼：《人类学的四大传统——英国、德国、法国和美国的人类学》，高丙中等译，商务印书馆2008年版。
8、[美]埃尔曼·R.瑟维斯：《人类学百年争论：1860-1960》，贺志雄等译，云南大学出版社1997年版。
9、[英]阿兰·巴纳德：《人类学历史与理论》，王建民、刘源、许丹等译，华夏出版社2006年版。
10、张庆熊著：《社会科学的哲学——实证主义、诠释学和维特根斯坦的转型》，复旦大学出版社2010年版。
11、洪汉鼎著：《当代西方哲学两大思潮》，下册，商务印书馆2010年版。
12、[美]克利福德格尔茨：《文化的解释》，韩莉译，译林出版社2008年版。
13、[美]威廉·亚当斯：《人类学的哲学之根》，黄剑波、李文建译，广西师范大学出版社2006年版。
14、张旭东著：《全球化时代的文化认同》，北京大学出版社2006年版。
15、马德普著：《普遍主义的贫困——自由主义政治哲学批判》，人民出版社2005年版。
16、纳日碧力戈著：《语言人类学》，华东理工大学出版社2010年版。
17、[英]A.R.拉德克利夫-布朗：《原始社会的结构和功能》，潘蛟、王贤海、刘文远、知寒译，中央民族大学出版社1999年版。
18、张民安著：《现代过错侵权责任制度研究》，中国政法大学出版社2002年版。
19、[英]梅因：《古代法》，沈景一译，商务印书馆1959年版。
20、[美]富勒：《法律的道德性》，郑戈译，商务印书馆2005年版。
21、[德]哈贝马斯：《认识与兴趣》，郭官义、李黎译，学林出版社1999年版。
22、[美]托马斯·库恩：《科学革命的结构》，金吾伦、胡新和译，北京大学出版社2003年版。
23、何勤华著：《西方法学史》，中国政法大学出版社2000年版。
24、[美]刘易斯·科塞：《理念人：一项社会学的考察》，郭方等译，中央编译出版社2004年版。
25、[美]柯林斯：《哲学的社会学——一种全球的学术变迁理论》（上），吴琼等译，新华出版社2004年版。
26、[美]乔治·E.马尔库斯、米开尔·M.J.费彻尔：《作为文化批评的人类学：一个人文科学的试验时代》，王铭铭、蓝达居译，生活·读书·新知三联书店1998年版。
27、[英]埃文思-普里查德：《努尔人：对尼罗河畔一个人群的生活方式和政治制度的描述》，储建芳、阎书昌、赵旭东译，华夏出版社2001年版。
28、[英]埃文思-普里查德：《阿赞德人的巫术、神谕和魔法》，覃俐俐译，商务印书馆2010年版。
29、黄应贵著：《返景入深林：人类学的关照、理论与实践》，商务印书馆2010年版。
30、[美]克利福德·吉尔茨：《地方性知识：阐释人类学论文集》，王海龙、张家瑄译，中央编译出版社2004年版。
31、[德]黑格尔：《精神现象学》（上卷），贺麟、王玖兴译，商务印书馆1979年版。
32、[德]埃德蒙德·胡塞尔：《笛卡尔式的沉思》，张廷国译，中国城市出版社2001年版。
33、[法]萨特：《存在与虚无》，陈宣良译，生活·读书·新知三联书店1987年版。
34、杜小真著：《存在和自由的重负：解读萨特<存在与虚无>》，山东人民出版社2002年版。
35、王恒著：《时间性：自身与他者——从胡塞尔、海德格尔到列维纳斯》，江苏人民出版社2006年版。
1、新华通讯社译名室主编：《英语姓名译名手册》，商务印书馆2004年版。
2、郑家馨主编：《殖民主义史·非洲卷》，北京大学出版社2000年版。
3、[美]西奥多·M.波特、多萝西·罗斯主编：《剑桥科学史·第七卷：现代社会科学》，第七卷翻译委员会译，大象出版社2008年版。
4、陈启能主编：《大英帝国从殖民地撤退前后》，方志出版社2007年版。
5、何勤华、洪永红主编：《非洲法律发达史》，法律出版社2006年版。
6、陆庭恩、彭坤元主编：《非洲通史·现代卷》，华东师范大学出版社1995年版。
7、刘润清编著：《西方语言学流派》，外语教学与研究出版社2002年版。
8、艺衡主编：《学派的天空——人类文明史上的思想群落》，广西师范大学出版社2009年版。
9、[丹]克斯汀·海斯翠普主编：《他者的历史：社会人类学与历史制作》，贾士衡译，麦田出版社1998年版。
10、[美]詹姆斯·克利福德、乔治·E.马库斯主编：《写文化：民族志的诗学与政治学》，高丙中，吴晓黎，李霞等译，商务印书馆2006年版。
11、中共中央马克思恩格斯列宁斯大林著作编译局编：《马克思恩格斯选集》，第21卷，人民出版社1979年版。
1、徐晓光：《日本法律人类学研究的历史与现状》，载《中南民族大学学报》2006年第3期。
2、杨方泉：《法律人类学研究述评》，载《学术研究》2003年第2期。
3、张冠梓：《法人类学的理论方法及其流变》，载《国外社会科学》2003年第5期。
4、徐亚文、孙国东：《为法治找寻沃土──法律人类学的历史、主题与启示》，载《求索》2004年第3期。
5、高丙中、章邵增：《以法律多元为基础的民族志研究》，载《中国社会科学》2005年第5期。
6、赵旭东：《秩序、过程与文化———西方法律人类学的发展及其问题》，载《环球法律评论》2005年第5期。
7、明辉：《穿行于法律与人类学之间———西方法律人类学的历史、现状及趋势》，载《比较法研究》2008年第4期。
8、胡鸿保、张晓红：《语言、话语与法律人类学———从<规则与关系———法律话语的民族志>一书谈起》，载《青海民族研究》2010年第1期。
9、赵旭东：《部落社会中的政治、法律与仪式》，载《民俗研究》1999年第4期。
10、严存生：《霍贝尔的法人类学》，载《法律科学》1991年第4期。
11、严文强：《阐释真实的法律生活——论法人类学对纠纷的研究》，载《宁夏大学学报》（人文社会科学版）2008年第3期。
12、朱晓阳：《语言混乱与法律人类学的整体论进路》，载《中国社会科学》2007年第2期。
13、王海军：《发生学方法与中国法制史的研究》，载《中南大学学报(社会科学版)》2010年第6期。
14、王铭铭：《从“没有统治者的部落”到“剧场国家”》，载《西北民族研究》2010年第3期。
15、郑戈：《法学是一门社会科学吗?——试论“法律科学”的属性及其研究方法》，载《北大法律评论》1998年第1期。
16、高春常：《“赫斯科维茨———弗雷泽争议”及其余波》，载《历史教学》2007年第4期。
17、童世骏：《为何种普遍主义辩护——与赵敦华教授商榷》，载《学术月刊》2007年第5期。
18、薄振峰：《法律、理性与人类正义——朱利叶斯·斯通的实用主义正义观》，载《环球法律评论》2006年第2期。
19、刘星：《美国人手里的牛津大学法理学教鞭——德沃金的法理学革命》，载《比较法研究》1998年第3期。
20、王铭铭：《功能主义人类学的重新评估》，载《北京大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》1996年第2期。
21、许晶：《从“Representation”看人类学“表述危机”》，载《广西民族研究》2006年第3期。
22、邱慧：《非理性还是不同的合理性——阿赞德人的案例》，载《自然辨证法研究》2004年第5期。
23、黄应贵：《Tiv与Siane经济：经济人类学的实质论派与形式论派之比较》，载《‘中央研究院’民族学研究所集刊》1974年第35期。
1、林端：《法律人类学简介》，载林端：《儒家伦理与法律文化：社会学观点的探索》，中国政法大学出版社2002年版。
2、梁治平：《法律的文化解释》，载梁治平主编《法律的文化解释》，生活·读书·新知三联书店1998年版。
3、尤陈俊：《困境及其超越：当代中国法学研究中的法律人类学》，载郑永流主编：《法哲学与法社会学论丛》，第11期，北京大学出版社2007年版。
4、陈柏峰：《法律民族志与当代中国法律社会学的使命》，载郑永流主编：《法哲学与法社会学论丛》，第11期，北京大学出版社2007年版。
5、林端：《韦伯法律社会学的两大面向》，载林端：《儒家伦理与法律文化：社会学观点的探索》，中国政法大学出版社2002年版。
6、朱晓阳：《人类学的表征危机与地志学转向》，载王铭铭主编：《中国人类学评论》，第6辑，世界图书出版公司2008年版。
7、张静：《“雷格瑞事件”引出的知识论问题》，载《清华社会学评论》，第2辑，鹭江出版社2000年版。
1、夏希原：《马克斯·格卢克曼的社会人类学》，中央民族大学硕士学位论文，2010年。
2、李小妍：《霍贝尔的法人类学思想研论》，山东大学硕士学位论文，2006年。
3、陈梦：《论马林诺夫斯基的人类学研究对法学的贡献》，山东大学硕士学位论文，2006年。
4、严文强：《凉山彝族习惯法的历史流变——以案例分析为中心的研究》，西南政法大学博士学位论文，2008年。
5、周欣宇：《文化与制度：藏区命价纠纷的法律分析》，西南政法大学博士学位论文，2009年。
郑少雄：《经济人类学的历史转向》，载《中国社会科学报》2010年12月14日第2版。
1、[美]波斯比斯尔：《法律不是什么》，胡昌明译，http://article.chinalawinfo.com/Article_Detail.asp?ArticleId=34649（,访问日期：2011年11月14日）。
2、朱晓阳：《第二周课的讨论问题》，http://groups.google.com/group/flrlx/browse_thread/thread/61fcd56e19a3cac6?hl=zh-CN#,（访问日期：2011年11月20日）
1、[澳]M.克雷齐尔：《法律人类学评介》（傅再明译），《国外社会科学》1987年第11期。
2、[德]K.F.科克：《法律与人类学》（杨周云译），《世界民族》1987年第6期。
3、[美]科利尔：《北美社会人类学分支学科的兴起与衰落》（骆建建、袁同凯、郭立新等译），[美]古塔、弗格森主编：《人类学定位——田野科学的界限与基础》，华夏出版社2005年版。
4、[美]帕梯·J.皮尔托、格丽特尔·H.皮尔托：《人类学中的主位和客位研究法》（胡燕子译），《民族译丛》1991年第4期。
5、[美]雪莉·奥特纳：《20世纪60年代以来的人类学理论》（黄剑波译），庄孔韶主编《人类学经典导读》，中国人民大学出版社2004年版。
6、[南非]科尼利厄斯·G.凡·德尔·马尔维：《大陆法系与普通法系在南非与苏格兰的融合》（翟寅生译），《清华法律评论》2009年第1期。
7、[美]保罗·博安南：《法律与法律制度》（原江译），[英]马林诺夫斯基著《原始社会的犯罪与习俗》，法律出版社2007年版。
8、[英]玛格丽特玛斯特曼：《范式的本质》（周寄中译），[英]伊姆雷拉卡托斯、艾兰马斯格雷夫主编《批判与知识的增长》，华夏出版社1987年版。
9、[美]克利福德·吉尔茨：《地方知识：事实与法律的比较透视》（邓正来译），梁治平主编：《法律的文化解释》，生活·读书·新知三联书店1998年版。
1、 Adam Kuper, Anthropologists and Anthropology: The British School1922-1972, Penguin,1973.
2、Arnold Leonard Epstein, Juridical Techniques and The Judicial Process: AStudy in African Customary Law, Manchester University Press,1954.
3、 Barbara Yngvesson, Virtuous Citizens, Disruptive Subjects: Order andComplaint in a New England Court, Routledge,1993.
4、Bronislaw Malinowski, Crime and Custom in Savage Society, GreenwoodPress,1926.
5、Bronislaw Malinowski, A Diary in the Strict Sense of the Term,Harcourt,Brace&World,1967.
6、Bronislaw Malinowski, Coral Gardens and Their Magic, E. P. Dutton edition,1961.
7、Carol Greenhouse, Praying for Justice: Faith, Order, and Commuity in anAmerican Town, Cornell University Press,1986.
8、Cathie J. Witty, Mediation and Society: Conflict Management in Lebanon,Academic Press,1980.
9、Cornelis van Vollenhoven, Miskenningen van Het Adatrecht, Brill,1909.
10、 David Kenneth Fieldhouse, Colonialism1870-1945, Weidenfield andNicholson,1981.
11、David Kenneth Fieldhouse, The Colonial Empires, Macmillan,1982.
12、David M. Engel, Code and Custom in a Thai Provincial Court, University ofArizona Press,1978.
13、E. E. Evans-Pritchard, Witchcraft, Oracles, and Magic among the Azande,Oxford University Press,1937.
14、Fabian Johannes, Time and Other： How Anthropology Makes its Object,Columbia University Press,1983.
15、Franz Boas, The Mind of Primitive Man, Macmillan,1938.
16、Franz von Benda-Beckmann, Property in Social Continuity and Change inthe Maintenance of Property Relationships through Time in Minangkabau, WestSumatra, Martinus Nijhoff,1979.
17、 Frederick Lugard, The Dual Mandate in British Tropical Africa, W.Blackwood and Sons,1922.
18、Ian Hamnett, Chieftainship and Legitimacy: An Anthropological Study ofExecutive Law in Lesotho, Routledge&Kegan Paul,1975.
19、Isaac Schapera, Handbook of Tswana Law and Custom, Oxford UniversityPress,1938.
20、James M. Donovan, Legal Anthropology: An Introduction, Altamira Press,2008.
21、Jane Fishburne Collier, Law and Social Change in Zinacantan, StanfordUniversity Press,1973.
22、Jane Fishburne Collier, Marriage and Inequality in Classless Societies,Standford University Press,1988.
23、Joan Vincent, Anthropology and Politics: Visions, Traditions, and Trends,University of Arizona Press,1990.
24、Johan Frederik Holleman, Shona Customary Law, With reference to Kinship,Marriage, the Family and the Estate, Oxford University Press,1952.
25、John L. Comaroff and Simon Roberts, Rules and Processes: The CulturalLogic of Dispute in an African Context, The University of Chicago Press,1981.
26、John M. Conley and William M. O'Barr, Rules versus Relationships: TheEthnography of Legal Discourse, University of Chicago Press,1990.
27、John M. Conley and William M. O'Barr, Just Words：Law, Language, andPower, University of Chicago Press,1998.
28、Julius Stone, The Province and Function of Law: Law as Logic, Justice andSocial Control, A Study in Jurisprudence, Associated General Publications Pty.ltd.,1946.
29、June Starr, Dispute and Settlement in Rural Tarkey: An Ethnography of Law,Brill,1978.
30、June Starr, Dispute and Settlement in Rural Tarkey: An Ethnography of Law,Brill,1978.
31、Klaus-Friedrich Koch, War and Peace in Jalemo: The Management ofConflict in Highland New Guinea, Harvard University Press,1974.32、 Laura Bohannan and Paul Bohannan, The Tiv of Central Nigeria,International African Institute,1953.
33、Leopold J. Pospisil, Kapauku Papuans and Their Law, Yale UniversityPublications in Anthropology,1958.
34、Leopold J. Pospisil, The Kapauku Papuans of West New Guinea, Holt,Rinehart and Winston,1963.
35、Leopold Pospisil, The Ethnology of Law, Addison-Wesley PublishingCompany, Inc.,1972.
36、Lloyd A. Fallers, Law Without Precedent: Legal Ideas in Action in the Courtsof Colonial Busoga, University of Chicago Press,1969.
37、M. J. Herskovits, Cultural Relativism: Perspectives in Cultural Pluralism,Random House,1973.
38、Marilyn Strathern, The Gender of the Gift: Problems with Women andProblems with Society in Melanesia, University of California Press,1988.
39、Max Gluckman, The Judicial Process among the Barotse of NorthernRhodesia, Manchester University Press,1955.
40、Max Gluckman, Order and Rebellion in tribal Africa, The Free Press ofGlencoe,1963.
41、Max Gluckman, The Ideas in Barotse Jurisprudence, Yale University Press,1965.
42、Max Gluckman, Politics, Law and Ritual in Tribal Society, Oxford BasilBlackwell,1965.
43、Max Gluckman, The Judicial Process among the Barotse of NorthernRhodesia, Manchester University Press,1967.
44、Max Gluckman, The Ideas in Barotse Jurisprudence, Yale University Press,1972.
45、Max Gluckman, The Judicial Process among the Barotse of NorthernRhodesia, Manchester University Press,1973.
46、Melville Jean Herskovits, Man and His Works: The Science of CulturalAnthropology, Knopf,1948.
47、Michele Stephen, A'aisa's Gift: A Study of Magic and the Self, University ofCalifornia Press,1995.
48、Norbert Rouland, Legal Anthropology, translated by Philippe G. Planel, TheAthlone Press,1994.
49、P. H. Gulliver, Neighbours and Networks: The Idiom of Kinship in SocialAction Among the Ndendeuli of Tanzania, University of California Press,1971.
50、P. H. Gulliver, Social Control in an African Society: A Study of the Arusha:Agricultural Masai of Northern Tanganyika, Routledge&Kegan Paul,1963.
51、Paul Bohannan, Justice and Judgment among the Tiv, Oxford UniversityPress,1957.
52、Paul Bohannan, Social Anthropology, Holt, Rinehart and Winston,1963.
53、Paul Bohannan, Africa and Africans, The Natural History Press,1964.
54、Paul Bohannan, Justice and Judgment Among the Tiv, Waveland press,1968.
55、Paul Bohannan, All the Happy Families: Exploring the Varieties of FamilyLife, McGraw-Hill,1985.
56、Paul Bohannan, Justice and Judgment among the Tiv, Waveland Press,1989.
57、Paul Philip Howell, A Manual of Nuer Law: Being an Account of CustomaryLaw, its Evolution and Development in the Courts Established by the SudanGovernment, Negro Universities Press,1954.
58、Polo de Ondegardo, Report, in Narratives of the Rites and Laws of the Incas,translated by Clements R. Markham, London,1837. from Laura Nader, Koch Klausand Bruce Cox, The Ethnography of Law: A Bibliographic Survey, CurrentAnthropology, Vol.7,1966, No.3.
59、Richard R. Wilk and Lisa Cliggett, Economies and Cultures: Foundations ofEconomic Anthropology, Westview Press,2007.
60、Saltman Mickael, The Kipsigis：A Case Study in Changing Customary Law,Transaction Publishers,1977.
61、Simon Roberts, Order and Dispute: An Introduction to Legal Anthropology,Penguin Books,1979.
62、Tom Bennett, Customary Law in South Africa, Juta and Company Ltd.,2004.
63、 Uwe Wesel, Fruhformen des Rechts in vorstaatlichen Gesellschaften,Suhrkamp,1985.
64、Victor Turne, Schism and Continuity in an African Society: A study ofNdembu Village Life, Manchester University Press,1957.
65、William Seagle, The Quest for Law, A. A. Knopf,1941.
66、William Twining, Karl Llewellyn and the Realist Movement, Weidenfeld andNicolson,1973.
1、Ian Hammnett ed., Social Anthropology and Law, Acdemic Press,1977.
2、Karl Polanyi, Conrad M. Arensberg and Harry W. Pearson ed., Trade andMarket in the Early Empires: Economies in History and Theory, Free Press,1957.
3、Laura Nader and Harry F Todd ed., The Disputing Process: Law in TenSocieties, Columbia University Press,1978.
4、Laura Nader ed., Law in Culture and Society, Aldine Publish,1969.
5、Max Gluckman ed., Ideas and Procedures in African Customary Law, OxfordUniversity Press,1969.
6、P. H. Gulliver ed., Cross-Examinatons Essay in Memory of Max Gluckman, E.J. Brill-Leiden,1978.
7、Paul Bohannan ed., African Homicide and Suicide, Princeton University Press,1960.
8、Paul Bohannan and George Dalton ed., Markets in Africa: Aight SubsistenceEconomies, Northwestern University Press,1962.
9、Peter G. Sack and Jonathan Aleck ed., Law and Anthropology: TheInternational Library of Essays in Law and Legal Theory: Legal Cultures, New YorkUniversity Press,1992.
10、Richard Wilson ed., Human Rights: Culture and Context, Pulto Press,1997.
11、Stanley Diamond ed., Culture in History: Essays in Honor of Paul Radin,Columbia University Press,1960.
12、Thomas N. Headland, Kenneth Lee Pike, Marvin Harris ed., Emics andEtics the Insider/Outsider Debate, Sage Publications,1990.
13、William Fielding Ogburn and Alexander Goldenweiser ed., The SocialSciences, Houghton Mifflin Company,1927.
1、A. L. Epstein, The Case Method in the Field of Law, in A. L. Epstein ed., TheCraft of Social Anthropology, Tavistock,1967.
2、A. L. Goodhart, Foreword, in Max Gluckman, The Judicial Process among theBarotse of Northern Rhodesia, Manchester University Press,1955.
3、A. L. Kroeber, Roy Franklin Barton,1883-1947, American Anthropologist,Vol.51,1949.
4、A. N. Allot, A. L. Epstein and Max Gluckman, Introduction, in MaxGluckman ed., Ideas and Procedures in African Customary Law, Oxford UniversityPress,1969.
5、A. Richards, The Concept of Culture in Malinqwski’s Work and Schapera,Malinowski’s Theories of Law in Raymond Firth ed., Man and Culture: AnEvaluation of the work of Bronislaw Malinowiki, Routledge&K. Paul,1957.
6、A. S. Diamond, Review: The Law of Primitive Man-A Study in ComparativeLegal Dynamics and The Judicial Process among the Barotse of Northern Rhodesia,The International and Comparative Law Quarterly, Vol.5, No.4,1956.
7、Alan Jones, Mekeo Chiefs and Sorcerers: Metaphor, Ideology and Practice,Oceania, Vol.77, No.3,2007.8、 Annelise Riles, Representing In-Between: Law, Anthropology, and theRhetoric of Interdisciplinarity, U. Ill. L. Rev,1994.
9、Bergendorff Steen, Contextual Translation--Concepts and Practices Among theMekeo of Papua New Guinea, Oceania, Vol.79, No.3,2009.
10、Bronislaw Malinowski, The Present State of Studies in Culture Contact:Some Comments on an American Approach, Africa Ⅻ,1939.
11、Carol J. Greenhouse, Nature Is to Culture as Praying Is to Suing: LegalPluralism in an American Suburb,20J. Legal Pluralism&Unof-ficial L,1982.
12、Carol J. Greenhouse, Just in Time: Temporality and the Cultural Legitimationof Law,98Yale L. J.1631,1989.
13、Chris Fuller, Legal Anthropology, Leagl Pluralism and Leagl Thought,Anthropology Today, Vol.10, No.3,1994.
14、Cox and Drever, Some Recent Trends in the Ethnography of Law, Law andSociety Review, Vol.5,1971.15、 Douglas Taylor, On Anthropologists'Use of Linguistics, AmericanAnthropologist, New Series, Vol.60, No.5,1958.
16、E. Adamson Hoebel, Review: The Judicial Process among the Barotse ofNorthern Rhodesia, The University of Chicago Law Review, Vol.23, No.3,1956.
17、E. Adamson Hoebel, Review: The Quest for Law, American Anthropologist,Vol.44,1942.
18、E. Adamson Hoebel, Three Studies in African Law, Stanford Law Review,Vol.13, No.2,1961.
19、E. E. Evans-Pritchard, Social Anthropology: Past and Present, MarettLecture(1950), in Essays in Social Anthropology, Faber and Faber,1962.
20、Ethel M. Albert, Review: The Judicial Process among the Barotse ofNorthern Rhodesia, American Anthropologist, Vol.61,1959.
21、Eugene Cotran, Restatement of African Law, Kenya Vol.1, The Law ofMarriage and Divorce, University of London School of Oriental and African Studies,1968.
22、Eugene Cotran, Restatement of African Law, Kenya Vol.2, The Law ofSuccession, Sweet&Maxwell,1969.
23、Francis G. Snyder, Anthropology, Dispute Processes and Law: A CriticalIntroduction, British Journal of Law&Society, Vol.8,1981.
24、Franz von Benda-Beckmann and Han F. Vermeulen, Adat Law and LegalAnthropology: In Memoriam Johan Frederik(Hans) Holleman (18December1915-28August2001)With a Bibliography, Journal of Legal Pluralism,Vol.46,2001.
25、Franz von Benda-Beckmann, Riding or Killing the Centaur? Reflections onthe Identities of Legal Anthropology, International Journal of Law in Context, Vol.4,2008.
26、H. Kuper and L. Kuper, Introduction, in H. Kuper and L. Kuper ed., AfricanLaw: Adaptation and Development, Univerisity of California Press，1965.
27、Hanser Peter, New Perspective for the Anthropology of Law: A Short Reporton the First German-French Symposium,28J. Legal Pluralism&Unofficial L,1989.
28、J. N. D. Anderson, Review of the Judical Process among the Barotse ofNorthern Rhodesia, The Modern Law Review,1955.
29、J. O. Ibik, Restatement of African Law, Malawi Vol.1, The Law of Marriageand Divorce, Sweet&Maxwell,1970.
30、J. O. Ibik, Restatement of African Law, Malawi Vol.2, The Law of Land,Succession, Movable Property, Agreements and Civil Wrongs, Sweet&Maxwell,1971.
31、J. Van Velsen, The Extended-Case Method and Situational Analysis, in A. L.Epstein ed., The Craft of Social Anthropology, Tavistock,1967.
32、Jan Vansina, A Traditional Legal System: The Kuba, in H. Kuper and L.Kuper ed., African Law: Adaptation and Development, Univerisity of California Press,1965.
33、James G. March, Sociological Jurisprudence Revisited, A Review (More orLess) of Max Gluckman, Stanford Law Review, Vol.8, No.3,1956.
34、Johan Frederik Holleman, Trouble-cases and Trouble-less Cases in the Studyof Customary Law and Legal Reform, Law&Society Review, Vol.7,1973.
35、John M. Conley and William M. O’Barr, Legal Anthropology Comes Home:A Brief History of the Ethnographic Study of Law, Loyola of Los Angeles LawReview, Vol.27,1993.
36、John M. Conley and William M. O’Barr, A Classic in Spite of Itself: TheCheyenne Way and the Case Method in Legal Anthropology, Law and Social Inquiry,Vol.29,2004.
37、Joshua Zake, Approaches to the Study of Legal Systems in NonliterateSocieties, Ph.D. Dissertation, Northwestern University, Department of Anthropology,Evanston,1962.
38、June Starr and Jonathon Pool, The Impact of a Legal Revolution in RuralTurkey,8Law&Soc'y Rev.533,1974.
39、June Starr and Barbara Yngvesson, Scarcity and Disputing: Zeroing-in onCompromise Decisions, Amercian Ethnologist, Vol.2,1975.
40、Kenneth Lee Pike, Language in Relation to a Unified Theory of the Structureof Human Behaviour, PartⅠ, Summer Institute of Linguistics,1954.
41、Klaus Fredrich Koch, Law and Anthropology: Thoughts on InterdisciplinaryResearch, Law and Society Review, Vol.4,1969.
42、Klaus Friedrich Koch, Law and Anthropology: Notes on InterdisciplinaryResearch， in Peter B. Hammond eds., Cultural and Social anthropology:Introductory Readings in Ethnology, Collier Macmillan Ltd,1975.
43、Laura Bohannan, Shakespeare in the Bush: An American Anthropologist SetOut to Study the Tiv of West Africa and was Taught the True Meaning of Hamlet,Natural History, Vol.66,1966.
44、Laura Nader, The Anthropological Study of Law, American Anthropologist,New Series, Vol.67, No.6,1965.45、 Laura Nader, Koch Klaus,Cox Bruce, The Ethnography of Law: ABibliographic Survey, Current Anthropology, Vol.7,1966.
46、Laura Nader, Introduction, in Laura Nader ed., Law in Culture and Society,Aldine Publish,1969.
47、Laura Nader and Barbara Yngvesson, On Studying the Ethnography of Lawand its Consequences, in John Joseph Honigmann ed., A Handbook of Social andCultural Anthropology, Rand McNally,1973.
48、Leopold Pospisil, The Attributes of Law, in Bohannan ed., Law and Warfare：Studies in the Anthropology of Conflict, The Natural History Press,1967.
49、Lloyd Bostock, Psychology and the Law: A Critical Review of Research andPractice, British Journal of Law and Society, Vol.8,1981.
50、Mark Ryan Goodale, Leopold Pospisil: A Critical Reappraisal, Journal ofLegal Pluralism, Vol.40,1998.
51、Martin Krygier, Anthropological Approaches, in Eugene Kamenka and AliceErh-Soon Tay eds., Law and Social Control, Edward Arnold,1980.
52、Mary Douglas, L’homme Primitif et la loi, Zaire, Vol.x,1956.
53、Max Gluckman, The Kingdom of the Zulu of South Africa in M. Fortes andEvans-Pritchard ed., Africa Political Systems, London,1940.
54、Max Gluckman, The Seven Year Research Plan of the Rhodes-LivingstoneInstitute of Social Studies in British Central Central Africa, Rhodes-LivingstoneInstitute Journal, Vol.4,1945.
55、Max Gluckman, The Reasonbale Man in Barotse Law:(Ⅰ)The Case of theViolent Councillor, Journal of African Administration, Vol.7,1955.
56、Max Gluckman, The Reasonbale Man in Barotse Law:(Ⅱ)The Case of theEloping Wife, Journal of African Administration, Vol.7,1955.
57、Max Gluckman, The Reasonbale Man in Barotse Law:(Ⅲ)The Case ofthe“Dog-in-the-Manger”Headman, Journal of African Administration, Vol.8,1955.
58、Max Gluckman, The Reasonbale Man in Barotse Law:(Ⅳ)The Case of theDisprespectful Councillor, Journal of African Administration, Vol.8,1955.
59、Max Gluckman, In Reply, Stanford Law Review, Vol.8, No.4,1956.60、 Max Gluckman, The Technical Vocabulary of Barotse Jurisprudence,American Anthropologist, New Series, Vol.61, No.5, Part1,1959.
61、Max Gluckman, African Jurisprudence,Advancement of Science, Vol.18,1961.
62、Max Gluckman, Natural Justice in Africa, Natural Law Forum, Vol.9,1964.63、 Max Gluckman, Reasonableness and Responsibility in the Law ofSegmentary Societies, in Hilda Kuper and Leo Kuper ed., African law: Adaptationand Development, University Califonia Press,1965.
64、Max Gluckman, Introduction, in Arnold Leonard Epstein ed., The Craft ofSocial Anthropology, Tavistock,1967.
65、Max Gluckman, Concepts in the Concepts in Comparative Study of TribalLaw, in Laura Nader ed., Law in Culture and Society, Aldine Publish,1969.
66、P. H. Gulliver, Introduction for Case Studies of Law in Non-WesternSocieties, in Laura Nader ed., Law in Culture and Society, University of CaliforniaPress,1969.67、 P. H. Gulliver, Process and Decision, in P. H. Gulliver ed.,Cross-Examinations Essay in Memory of Max Gluckman, E. J. Brill-Leiden,1978.
68、Paul Bohannan, Concepts of Time among the Tiv of Nigeria, SouthwesternJournal of Anthropology, Vol.9, No.3,1953.
69、Paul Bohannan, On the Use of Native Language Categories in Ethnology,American Anthropologist, New Series, Vol.58, No.3,1956.70、 Paul Bohannan, On Anthropologists' Use of Language, AmericanAnthropologist, New Series, Vol.60, No.1,1958.
71、Paul Bohannan, On Anthropologists' Use of Linguistics: Rejoinder, AmericanAnthropologist, New Series, Vol.60, No.5,1958.
72、Paul Bohannan, Gregory Bateson, David E. Hansen, Sidney Morgenbesser,Anthropological Theories, Science, New Series, Vol.129, No.3345,1959.
73、Paul Bohannan, Anthropology and the Law, in Sol Tax ed., Horizons ofAnthropology, Aldine Pub. Co,1964.
74、Paul Bohannan,The Differing Realms of the Law,American Anthropologist,Vol.67, No.6,1965.75、 Paul Bohannan,Review: The Ideas in Barotse Jurisprudence,KroeberAnthropogical Papers, Vol.36,1967.
76、Paul Bohannan, The Differing Realms of the Law, in Bohannan ed., Law andWarfare：Studies in the Anthropology of Conflict, The Natural History Press,1967.77、 Paul Bohannan, Law and legal Institutions, in David L. Sills ed.,International Encyclopaedia of the Social Sciences, Vol.9,1968.
78、Paul Bohannan, Ethnography and Comparison in Legal Anthropology, inLaura Nader ed., Law in Culture and Society, Aldine Publish,1969.
79、Paul Bohannan, Some Long-Since-Afterthoughts on Justice and Judgment,Newsl. Ass’n Pol.&Leg. Anthropology, Vol.4,1980.
80、Paula Brown, Review: Tiv Farm and Settlement, American Anthropologist,New Series, Vol.57, No.6,1955.
81、Peter Just, History, Power, Ideology, and Culture: Current Directions in theAnthropology of Law, Law&Society Review, Vol.26, No.2,1992.82、 Peter Sack, Law, Language, Culture: Verbal Acrobatics and SocialTechnology,41J. Legal Pluralism&Unofficial L,1998.
83、Peter Winch, Understanding a Primitive Society, American PhilosophicalQuarterly, Vol.1, No.4,1964.84、 R. Schott, Rechtsethnologie, in Hans Fischer Hg. Ethnologie, eineEinführung, Dietrich Reimer Verlag,1983.
85、Radcliffe-Brown, Primitive Law,9Encyclopaedia of the Social Sciences,1933.
86、Ralph L. Beals, Native Terms and Anthropological Methods, AmericanAnthropologist, New Series, Vol.59, No.4,1957.
87、Raymond Firth, Max Gluckman,1911-1975, Proceedings of the BritishAcademy, Vol.61,1975.
88、Richard Brown, Passages in the Life of a White Anthropologist: MaxGluckman in Northern Rhodesia, Journal of African History, Vol.20,1979.
89、Richard L. Abel, A Comparative Theory of Dispute Institutions in Society,Law&Society Review, Vol.8, No.2,1974.
90、Robert M. Hayden, Review: Rules, Processes, and Interpretations: Geertz,Comaroff, and Roberts, American Bar Foundation Research Journal, Vol.9, No.2,1984.
91、Roy Franklin Barton, Ifugao law,University of California Publications inAmerican Archaeology and Ethnology, Vol.15,1919.
92、S. F. Nadel, Reason and Unreason in African Law, Africa: Journal of theInternational African Institute, Vol.26, No.2,1956.
93、Sally Engle Merry, Transnational Human Rights and Local Activism:Mapping the Middle, American Anthropologist, Vol.108, Issue1.
94、Sally Falk Moore, Law and Anthropology, Biennial Review of Anthropology,Vol.6,1969.
95、Sally Falk Moore, Introduction: Comparative Studies, in Laura Nader ed.,Law in Culture and Society, Aldine Publish,1969.
96、Sally Falk Moore, Comparative Studies, in Laura Nader ed., Law in Cultureand Society, Aldine Publish,1969.
97、Sally Falk Moore, Archaic Law and Modern Times on the Zambezi: SomeThoughts on Max Gluckman’s Interpretation of Barotse Law, in P. H. Gulliver ed.,Cross-Examinations Essay in Memory of Max Gluckman, E. J. Brill-Leiden,1978.
98、Sally Falk Moore, Certainties Undone: Fifty Turbulent Years of LegalAnthropology,1949-1999, The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, Vol.7,2001.
99、Samuel Enoch Stumpf, Review: The Judicial Process among the Barotse ofNorthern Rhodesia, Harvard Law Review, Vol.69, No.4,1956.
100、Sidney Morgenbesser, Role and Status of Anthropological Theories, Science,Vol.128,1958.
101、Simon Roberts, Law and the Study of Social Control in Small-ScaleSocieties, The Modern Law Review, Vol.39, No.6,1976.
102、Simon Roberts, Do We Need an Anthropology of Law? RAIN, No.25,1978.
103、Simon Roberts, Review: Chieftainship and legitimacy: An AnthropologicalStudy of Executive Law in Lesotho, Journal of African Law, Vol.25, No.1,1981.104、 Simon Roberts, Against Legal Pluralism: Some Reflections of theContemporary Enlargement of the Legal Domain,42J. Legal Pluralism&UnofficialL,1998.
105、T. H. Marshall, Gluckman on the Judicial Process of the Barotse, TheBritish Journal of Sociology, Vol.6, No.4,1955.106、 T. O. Elias, Reviews： Judgment and Justice among the Tiv, TheInternational and Comparative Law Quarterly, Vol.8, No.1,1959.
107、Veljanovski, The Economic Approach to Law: A Critical Introduction,British Journal of Law and Society, Vol.7,1980.
108、Victor Ayoub, Review: The Judicial Process in Two African Societies,inMorris Janowitz ed., Community Political Systems, International Yearbook ofPolitical Behavior Research, Vol.Ⅰ, Free Press,1961.109、 William Seagle, Primitive law and Professor Malinowski, AmericanAnthropologist, Vol.39,1937.110、 William Twining, Law and Anthropology: A Case Study inInter-Disciplinary Collaboration, Law&Society Review, Vol.7, No.4,1973.
111、William Twining, A Post-Westphalian Conception of Law, Law&SocietyReview, Vol.37, No.1,2003.
112、Wim M. J. van Binsbergen, Introduction: The dynamics of power and therule of law in Africa and Beyond,in Wim M. J. van Binsbergen ed., The Dynamics ofPower and the Rule of Law: Essays on Africa and Beyond；in Honour of EmileAdriaan B. van Rouveroy van Nieuwaal, Lit-Verlag,2003.
1、Angela Bratton, Feminist Anthropology, athttp://www.indiana.edu/~wanthro/fem.htm, Nov.21,2011.
2、Bronislaw Malinowski, athttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bronis%C5%82aw_Malinowski, Nov.5,2011.
3、Cecil Rhodes, at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cecil_Rhodes, Oct.29,2011.
4、Cornelis van Vollenhoven, athttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cornelis_van_Vollenhoven, Dec.7,2011.
5、Frederick John Dealtry Lugard, athttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frederick_Lugard,_1st_Baron_Lugard, Nov.1,2011.
6、Godfrey Wilson, at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godfrey_Wilson, Nov.3,2011.
7、Herskovits Prize, at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Herskovitz_Prize,Nov.10,2011.
8、Isaac Schapera,athttp://archives.lse.ac.uk/Record.aspx?src=CalmView.Catalog&id=SCHAPERA,Nov.5,2011.
9、Laura Bohannan, at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laura_Bohannan,Oct.31,2011.
10、Legal Anthropology, at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_anthropology,Oct.1,2011.
11、Max Gluckman, at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Max_Gluckman, Oct.1,2011.
12、Pamela J. Johnson: Pioneering Anthropologist was Authority on the Tiv Tribe,athttp://dornsife.usc.edu/news/stories/378/pioneering-anthropologist-was-authority-on-the-tiv-tribe/, Oct.1,2011.
13、Paul Bohannan, at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Bohannan, Oct.1,2011.
14、Rhodes Scholarships,at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rhodes_Scholarship,Oct.29,2011.
15、Robert Ranulph Marett, at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Marett,Oct.30,2011.
16、Southern Bantoid, at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Southern_Bantoid,
17、Thomas H. Maugh, Paul Bohannan,87; USC Anthropologist ResearchedNigerian Culture and American Divorce, athttp://www.latimes.com/news/science/la-me-bohannan2aug02,1,1578759.story?coll=la-news-science, Oct.1,2011.
18、Tiv, at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tiv_people, Nov.4,2011.
19、Franz Baermann Steiner, athttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Franz_Baermann_Steiner, Sep.12,2011.