建构主义视野下的自传体记忆研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
自传体记忆是现代认知心理学的研究热点之一,是自我与记忆的交叉领域。它是一种长时记忆,存储着与个体密切相关的图式,既包含个体对自我的认识(自我图式),也包含个体对自己所处社会的认识(社会图式)。自我图式和社会图式是在个体与社会环境的互动过程中习得的,是在外界信息与已有记忆之间进行主动建构的结果。社会互动和建构是建构主义思想的主要观点。
     建构主义是心理学研究的一个新视角,强调话语的建构性,认为心理现象既不存在于个体内部,也不简单地存在于外部,而是存在于人与人之间,是人际关系的结果,是社会关系的产物。无论自我建构(信息加工建构)还是社会建构,都是特定的人在特定的社会文化背景中与其他人交互作用的建构。对于一种特定现象,它首先是在社会交往中出现的,是通过话语来建构意义的,如自传体记忆的概念,如提取自传体记忆内容与他人分享时的叙事或情境故事的讲述。其次,当个体出现心理问题时,他可以借助话语来寻找意义,进而建构合理的关系。建构主义在理论研究和实践应用领域逐渐被人们所接受。建构主义强调了心理现象的文化相对性,促进了心理学对文化历史因素的关注,推动了世界范围内的心理学本土化运动。跨文化研究在包括自传体记忆在内的各种心理现象领域都有所表现。
     虽然建构主义各种取向的具体观点不尽相同,但实际上自我建构和社会建构是统一的整体,个体在与社会的交互作用中接受各种外界信息,既包含他人对自己行为的评价和态度,建构后形成自我图式;也包括社会文化对自己的规范信息,建构后形成社会图式。自我建构和社会建构都要完成对信息的加工,此外还要实现自传体记忆的自我功能和社会功能。自我建构有助于个体自我的形成和发展,社会建构有助于个体与他人建立亲密感、告知或教育他人。社会建构强调社会环境的作用,尤其是文化。个体在各种条件下都可能变换地域、国家,从而经历文化的变迁,适应当前的文化而减少过去文化的影响,经历跨文化的社会建构。这是更为复杂的社会建构过程,在新的社会和文化中学习语言,建构话语,习得对应的社会图式,进而实现人际互动。
     本文以作为当代心理学主流思潮之一的社会建构论为背景,以现代心理学的历史及其成就为立足点,密切跟踪作为当代心理学前沿的自传体记忆研究成果,系统考察自传体记忆及其心理学研究,从而为自传体记忆研究提供一个新的理论视野。论文研究工作的基本思路依循如下逻辑线索:
     第一章概要讨论作为论文研究工作之基础的若干关键主题,包括自传体记忆、建构、图式等,并考察其研究的历史与现状,以阐明论文研究工作的背景和意义。
     第二章系统考察文中涉及的主体内容的相关研究,包括自我、记忆和自传体记忆。这类研究是非常多的,在内容选择和安排上,作者本人在有关问题上进行了“建构”。文中涉及三个非常重要的概念:自我、记忆和自传体记忆,首先对这三个概念进行辨析;接着阐述与自传体记忆相关的自我理论,包括主客维度、时间维度等方面的自我解释;然后阐述和自传体记忆相关的记忆理论,在记忆领域中有两个重要的人物:Ebbinghaus和Bartlett,前者对记忆的传统研究有重大影响,后者则在批判前者的基础上发展了自己的记忆理论,提出了自传体记忆和建构的思想;最后重点分析自传体记忆,从建构主义视角予以说明。
     第三章从个体的生物身份出发,在认知建构主义的基础上,解释自传体记忆如何进行自我建构,包括信息加工过程的建构,如何在编码、提取过程中建立自我图式与外界信息之间的有效联系,自传体记忆和自我之间如何相互影响。
     第四章从个体的社会身份出发,在社会建构主义的基础上,解释自传体记忆如何完成社会建构,包括社会背景下的信息加工建构、个体进行社会交往时影响建构的因素,以及跨文化背景下社会建构的意义。
     第五章在对论文研究工作获得的基本结论加以总结的基础上,进一步阐明建构主义对自传体记忆研究的基础意义。
Autobiographical memory (AM), is one of the hot researches of moderncognitive psychology, and is a cross field between self and memory. It is a kind oflong-term memory storage, and storages a lot of schemas closely related to theindividual, which contains the understanding of individual (self-schema), alsocontains the understanding of their social (social schema). Self-schema and socialschema are learned in a social interaction between individuals and their socialenvironments, which are the active construction results between the outsideinformation with the existing memory.
     Constructivism is a new perspective in psychological research, emphasizing theconstruction of conversation, which believes that the psychological phenomenon doesnot exist in the individual, and not simply exist in the external, but exit betweenperson and person, that it is the result in relationship, and is the product of socialrelationship. No matter the self construction (information processing construction) orsocial construction, are constructions that certain people interact with other human incertain social and cultural background. For a particular phenomenon, it first appearedin social communication, through the discourse to construct meaning, such as theconcept of autobiographical memory, such as the extraction of autobiographicalmemory contents to share with others or to tell situational stories. Secondly, when aperson appears some psychological problem, he will find meaning in words andconstruct a reasonable relationship. Constructivism is accepted gradually by thepeople in theoretical study and practical application. Constructivism emphasizes thecultural relativity of psychological phenomenon, concerns the cultural and historicalfactors in psychology, and promotes the sports of psychological localization in theworld.Cross-cultural research has shown in the various field of psychologicalphenomena including autobiographical memory.
     There is a unified whole between self construction and social construction. Aperson accepts outside information in the interaction with the society, which includes information of evaluation by others for their own behaviors and attitudes thatconstructs self schema; also includes the social cultural information in order toregulate him that constructs social schema. Self construction and social constructioncomplete the processing of information, and realize self and social function ofautobiographical memory respectively. Self construction contributes to the formationand development of the individual self, social construction helps individuals toestablish intimacy with others and to inform or educate others. Social constructionemphasizes the effect of social environment, especially the cultural. The person maytransform region or country in all kinds of conditions, thus he will experience culturalchange, and adapt to the current culture and reduce the impact of the past culture,through the social construction of cross-cultural. A person must learn a language,construct conversation, get corresponding social schema, and then realize theinterpersonal interaction.
     This paper takes social constructivism as the background, which is one of themain trends of contemporary psychology, takes the history and achievements ofmodern psychology as the foothold, tracks autobiographical memory research whichis frontier of contemporary psychology closely, and studies autobiographical memoryand its psychological research systematically, in order to provide a new theoreticalperspective for autobiographical memory. The basic ideas in this paper are:
     The first chapter discusses several key themes as the basis of the research workbriefly, including autobiographical memory, constructivism and schema etc, andinvestigates the history and current situation of these researches in order to explain thebackground and significance of my research work.
     The second chapter introduces the relevant research, including self, memoryand autobiographical memory. On the content selection and arrangements, Iconducted a "construction on relevant issues". This article involves three importantconcepts: self, memory and autobiographical memory. First, I discriminated thesethree concepts; Second, I elaborated that the theories of the self related toautobiographical memory, including subjective-objective dimension and timedimension et al.; that the theories of memory related to autobiographical memory, including the important theories of Ebbinghaus and Bartlett, the former had asignificant impact on the traditional research on memory, while the latter is based oncriticizing the former on developing its own memory theory, proposed theautobiographical memory and thinking of construction; and that the analysis ofautobiographical memory from the perspective of constructivism.
     The third chapter explains how autobiographical memory completes its selfconstruction, including construction of information process; how it establish aneffective link between the self and the outside information though coding andextracting; and how autobiographical memory and self impact from the perspective ofindividual biometric identity, based on cognitive constructivism.
     The fourth chapter explains how autobiographical memory completes its socialconstruction, including construction of information process in social background, theinfluence factor of construction in social interaction between persons, and themeaning of social construction in cross-cultural background from the individual socialidentity, based on social constructivism.
     The fifth chapter is based on summary of this research work to further clarify thesense of Constructivism which can help autobiographical memory study.
引文
[1]安妍.自我概念、情绪状态对自传体记忆概括化影响的研究[D].东北师范大学,2009
    [2]伯格,乐克曼著,邹理民译.社会实体的建构[M].台北:台湾巨流出版社,1997
    [3]陈莹.时间自我:过去我、现在我和将来我的一致与不一致[D].西南大学,2008
    [4]崔丽弦,黄敏儿.沉思和分心对负情绪和自传体记忆的影响[J].心理学报,2007,39(1):78-87
    [5]丹尼尔.夏克特著,高申春译.找寻逝去的自我——大脑、心灵和往事的记忆[M].长春:吉林人民出版社,2001
    [6]段然.不同生活期下自传体记忆叙事性结构的实验研究[D].东北师范大学,2006
    [7]弗雷德里克. C.巴特莱特著,黎炜译.记忆:一个实验的与社会的心理学研究[M].杭州:浙江教育出版社,1998
    [8]弗洛伊德著,高觉敷译.精神分析引论[M].北京:商务印书馆,1984
    [9]高立娜,田丽娜等.社会认知神经科学视野下的自我研究述评[J].萍乡高等专科学校学报,2010,27(1):115-118
    [10]戈兆娇,郑莉君.自传体记忆及其与心理健康的关系[J].杭州师范学院学报(医学版),2008,28(4):284-288
    [11]郭本禹,修巧艳.马库斯的自我社会认知论[J].西南大学学报(人文社会科学版),2007,33(1):17-21
    [12]胡瑞恒.自传记忆与人格特质关系及其表征机制研究[D].浙江师范大学,2010
    [13]胡瑞恒,崔晓文等.国外父母-孩子自传叙事研究现状及展望[J].心理科学进展,2010,18(6):924-931
    [14]胡瑞恒,秦金亮.自传记忆三大功能研究述评[J].心理科学,2009,32(5):1159-1161
    [15]胡志军,张万里.自传体记忆的本土文化心理学取向研究路径[J].重庆科技学院学报(社会科学版),2010,5:141-143
    [16]黄捷,李昊等.压抑者对情绪和非情绪自传体记忆的提取诱发遗忘[J].心理科学,2007,30(6):1372-1378
    [17]黄先伟,何成森.自传体记忆与相关记忆的概念辨析[J].湖北成人教育学院学报,2010,16(3):6-7
    [18]简.卢文格著,韦子木译.自我的发展[M].杭州:浙江教育出版社,1998
    [19]蒋重清,李文辉.自我图式实证研究综述[J].辽宁师范大学学报(社会科学版),2011,34(2):39-42
    [20]金盛华.自我概念及概述[J].北京师范大学学报(哲社版),1996,(1):30
    [21]康德著,韦卓民译,.纯粹理性批判[M].武汉:华中师范大学出版社,2000
    [22]肯尼斯. J.格根著,郭慧玲,张颖,罗涛译.语境中的社会建构[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2011
    [23]孔慧君.关于记忆研究的两种传统[J].安阳师范学院学报,2003,(3):42-44
    [24]库利著,包凡一等译.人的本性和社会秩序[M].香港:华夏出版社,1999
    [25]李怀虎,陈友本等.关于自我独特性问题的研究[J].西南大学学报(社会科学版),2008,34(3):19-24
    [26]李力红,高粤.自传体记忆过度概括化产生的机制[J].东北师大学报(哲学社会科学版),2010,(6):184-190
    [27]李寿欣,李磊.自传体记忆过度概括化与抑郁和创伤后情绪障碍的关系[J].济南大学学报(社会科学版),2012,22(3):78-81
    [28]李晓东,孟威佳.自我图式理论——关于自我的信息加工观[J].东北师大学报(哲学社会科学版),2001,(4):106-110
    [29]李小鹿.婴儿期记忆缺失的社会文化观点[J].重庆科技学院学报(社会科学版),2010,(22):27-29
    [30]李文阁,于召平.生活世界:人的自我生成之域[J].求是学刊,2000(1):25-31
    [31]李文娟,吴艳红等.自我与有意遗忘现象[J].心理学报,2005,37(4):476-481
    [32]廖明英,陈旭.自我图式与心理健康[J].中国临床康复,2006,10(30):150-153
    [33]林超.记忆的自我参照效应研究综述[J].黑河学刊,2009,(4):38-39
    [34]刘保,肖峰.社会建构主义——一种新的哲学范式[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,2011
    [35]刘高岑.自我问题的演变及其当代意义[J].科学技术哲学研究,2010,27(12):26-31
    [36]刘化英.罗杰斯对自我概念的研究及其教育启示[J].辽宁师范大学学报(社会科学版),2000,(6):38
    [37]刘庆英,冯正直.抑郁症的整合情绪记忆模型述评[J].心理科学进展,2009,17(5):938-943
    [38]刘冉,张海燕.论后现代主义心理学取向的社会建构性特征[J].东南大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2011,(12):17-20
    [39]刘润清.西方语言学流派[M].北京:外语教学与研究出版社,1995
    [40]刘衔华,姚树桥等.抑郁症患者的自传体记忆特征及其应用自传体记忆测验的元分析[J].心理科学进展,2010,18(4):578-589
    [41]刘艳.自我建构研究的现状与展望[J].心理科学进展,2011,19(3):427-439
    [42]柳艳松,周振和等.轻性抑郁症患者抗抑郁药物治疗后概况化自传体记忆的特点[J].中国神经精神疾病杂志,2011,37(1):33-36
    [43]卢英俊,秦金亮.自传记忆的加工机制研究进展[J].心理科学,2007,30(2):495-497
    [44]卢英俊,秦金亮.自传记忆提取的神经机制[J].生物化学与生物物理进展,2007,34:121
    [45]卢英俊,秦金亮.自传体记忆提取的神经机制及其研究方法[J].心理科学进展,2008,16(4):548-554
    [46]路浩.大学生自传记忆中的自我参照效应[J].社会心理科学,2012,Z1:48-54
    [47]洛克著,关文运译.人类的理解[M].北京:商务印书馆,2012
    [48]吕厚超,黄希庭等.自传体记忆中时间标记研究述评[J].西南师范大学学报(自然科学版),2000,25(1):98-101
    [49]麻丽丽.自传记忆双重表征系统的存在与特征[D].浙江师范大学,2009
    [50]米尔顿. J.贝内特著,关世杰,何惺译.跨文化交流的建构与实践[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2012
    [51]毛明.自传体记忆研究的新进展及一些相关问题的验证[D].山东师范大学,2002
    [52]毛明.自传体记忆的概念及其主要现象[J].莱阳农学院学报,2004,16(3):85-89
    [53]米德著,赵月琴译.心灵、自我与社会[M].上海:世纪出版社,2005
    [54]莫映桃,高申春.记忆的社会建构论阐释[J].心理研究,2011,4(3):21-27
    [55]莫映桃.论记忆的社会建构本质[D].吉林大学,2009
    [56]皮亚杰著,倪连生,王琳译.结构主义[M].北京:商务印书馆,1984
    [57]皮亚杰著,王宪钿等译.发生认识论[M].北京:商务印书馆,1981
    [58]珀文著,周榕,陈红等译.人格科学[M].上海:华东师范大学出版社,2001
    [59]乔纳森.布朗著,陈浩莺等译.自我[M].北京:人民邮电出版社,2004
    [60]秦金亮.自传记忆与其提取机制实验的研究[D].华东师范大学,2003
    [61]秦金亮.自传记忆线索提取发展的实验研究[J].心理科学,2004,27(4):847-849
    [62]秦金亮.儿童自传记忆形成与发展的机制研究述评[J].心理科学,2005,28(1):158-160
    [63]石伟,黄希庭.自我与记忆[J].心理科学,2004,27(2):271-273
    [64]汪新建,朱艳丽.叙述方式、自我视角与自我发展[J].心理科学进展,2010,18(12):1858-1863
    [65]王冠舒.自我参照效应的国内外研究述评[J].大庆师范学院学报,2010,30(5):10-13
    [66]王江洋,张馨尹.3-5岁幼儿自传体记忆的发展及语言表达能力的作用[J].沈阳师范大学学报(社会科学版),2010,(3):101-105
    [67]王觅,高隽等.不同场认知风格个体的羞耻与悲伤记忆差异[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2009,17(5):570-574
    [68]王沛.自传体记忆研究述评[J].西北师大学报(社会科学版),1998,35(5):1-6
    [69]王沛.自传体记忆刍议[J].宁夏大学学报(人文社会科学版),2000,22(1):105-109
    [70]维果茨基著,李维译.思维与语言[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2010
    [71]伍麟,刑小莉.人的老化与社会情绪选择理论[J].医学心理学,2008,29(9):48-50
    [72]现代汉语词典[M].中国社会科学院语言研究所词典编辑室编,商务印书馆,2002年增补本
    [73]邢怀滨.社会建构论的技术观[M].沈阳:东北大学出版社,2005
    [74]杨红升.自传体记忆研究的若干新进展[J].北京大学学报(自然科学版),2004,40(6):1001-1010
    [75]杨红升.文化差异的认知影响[J].心理科学,2007,30(4):1002-1005
    [76]杨红升,黄希庭.群体参照记忆效应的跨文化比较研究[J].心理科学,2009,32(6):1287-1290
    [77]杨红升,黄希庭.中国人的群体参照记忆效应[J].心理学报,2007,39(2):235-241
    [78]杨红升,朱滢.自我与提取诱发遗忘现象[J].心理学报,2004,36(2):154-159
    [79]杨红升,朱滢.老年中国自我记忆效应的研究[J].心理科学,2004,27(1):43-45
    [80]杨莉萍.社会建构论心理学[M].上海:上海教育出版社,2006
    [81]杨莉萍,叶浩生.后现代社会建构主义心理学初探[J].湖北大学学报,哲学社会科学版,2003,30(5):99-103
    [82]杨绿.自传体记忆:记忆建构与自我建构的同一[D].吉林大学,2007
    [83]杨锐.论“自我”观念历史发展的三个阶段[D].吉林大学,2008
    [84]杨治良.记忆心理学(第二版)[M].上海:华东师范大学出版社,1999
    [85]姚树桥,刘衔华等.抑郁症患者的自传体记忆研究[J].中南大学学报(医学版),2010,35(7):679-681
    [86]叶浩生.西方心理学研究新进展[M].北京:人民教育出版社,2003
    [87]叶浩生.社会建构论与西方心理学的后现代取向[J].华东师范大学学报(教育科学版),2004,22(1):43-48
    [88]叶浩生.客观主义和建构主义:对立及其超越[J].自然辨证法研究,2007,(9):75-79
    [89]叶浩生.关于“自我”的社会建构学说及其启示[J].心理学探新,2002,(3):3-8
    [90]叶浩生.后现代心理学概观[J].南通师范大学学报,2004,(2):121-125
    [91]叶浩生.后经验主义时代的理论心理学[J].心理学报,2007,(1):184-190
    [92]叶浩生.社会建构论视野下的心理学[J].华东师范大学学报(教育科学版),2007,(1)
    [93]叶浩生.社会建构论与西方心理学的后现代取向[J].华东师范大学学报(教育科学版),2004,(1):43-48
    [94]叶浩生.社会建构论与心理学理论的未来发展[J].心理学报,2009,(6):557-564
    [95]叶浩生.社会建构论及其心理学的方法论蕴含[J].社会科学,2008,(12):111-185
    [96]易芳,郭本禹.社会建构论:心理学研究的一种新取向[J].江西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2003,36(4):82-86
    [97]张海钟,张鹏英.一种特殊的自我参照效应:群体参照效应[J].宁波大学学报(教育科学版),2011,33(2):39-43
    [98]张世英.哲学导论[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2005
    [99]张文江,伍小东,葛万华.对社会建构主义心理学的初步探讨[J].社会纵横,2007,22(3):153-156
    [100]张彦改.中国本土自我研究进展[J].湖北第二师范学院学报,2008,25(3):91-92
    [101]张媛.青、老年人自传体记忆提取特征及影响因素研究[D].云南师范大学,2007
    [102]张志杰,黄希庭.自传体记忆中的时间组织[J].心理科学,1998,21:460-461
    [103]张志杰,黄希庭.自传体记忆的研究[J].心理科学,2003,26(1):34-36
    [104]张镇,张建新.自我、文化与记忆:自传体记忆的跨文化研究[J].心理科学进展,2008,16(2):306-314
    [105]张子霁,廖翌凯等.自传体记忆与自我概念[J].西南大学学报(社会科学版),2009,35(2):11-17
    [106]赵佳,方格.婴幼儿自传体记忆研究的现状及展望[J].中国特殊教育,2005,(9):86-90
    [107]赵晶.抑郁、抑郁反应方式、认知方式与自传体记忆过度概括化的关系[D].山东师范大学,2010
    [108]赵晓晶,冯正直等.抑郁情绪大学生自传体记忆具体性特点的研究[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2009,17(2):204-209
    [109]周爱保,吴慧芬等.探究自我参照效应的新视角:基于新范式下的发现[J].心理研究,2010,3(3):42-46
    [110]周爱保,吴慧芬等.自我参照效应的发展性研究述评[J].宁波大学学报(教育科学版),2010,32(6):31-34
    [111]周爱保,李琼等.探索自我参照的新视角——社会认同与群体参照的比较[J].心理科学,2010,33(5):1159-1162
    [112]朱滢.文化与自我[M].北京:北京师范大学出版社,2007
    [113]朱滢,张力.自我记忆效应的实验研究[J].中国科学C辑,2001,31(6):538-543
    [1]Amanda Beaman, Dolores Pushkar, Sarah Etezadi, Dorothea Bye,&Michael Conway.Autobiographical memory specificity predicts social problem-solving ability in old andyoung adults[J]. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,2007,60(9),1275-1288
    [2]Anderson, Bjork et al. Remembering can cause forgetting: retrieval dynamics in long-termmemory[J]. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition,1994,20(5),1063-1087
    [3]Andersson&Roennberg. Recall suffers from collaboration: Joint recall effects offriendship and task complexity[J]. Applied Cognitive Psychology,1995,9,199-211
    [4]Anne, Wilson, Michael Ross. The identity function of autobiographical memory: Time inon our side[J]. Memory,2003,11(2),137-149
    [5]Atkinson,&Shiffrin. Human memory: A proposed system and its control processes. InSpence (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research andtheory (Vol.2). New York: Academic press,1968
    [6]Baltes, Theoretical propositions of life-span developmental psychology: On the dynamicsbetween growth and decline[J]. Developmental Psychology,23,611-626
    [7]Bavelas, Coates,&Johnson. Listeners as co-narrators[J]. Journal of Personality&SocialPsychology,2000,79,941-952
    [8]Beatrijs. Hauer, Ineke Wessel, Elke Geraerts&Harald Merckelbach, Tim Dalgleish.Autobiographical Memory Specificity After Manipulating Retrieval Cues in AdultsReporting Childhood Sexual Abuse[J]. Journal of Abnormal Psychology,2008,117(2),444-453
    [9]Berger,&Luckman. The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology ofknowledge[M]. Garden City, NJ: Anchor,1967
    [10]Black,&Stephens. The influence of the spouse on American expatriate adjustment inPacific Rin overseas assignments[J]. Journal of Management,1989,15,529-544
    [11]Bluck, Alea. Exploring the Functions of Autobiographical Memory: Why do I Rememberthe Autumn?[M]. New York: Springer,2002
    [12]Boder,&Bielby. The past as a resource: A conversational analysis of elderly talk[J].Human Development,1983,26,308-319
    [13]Brewer. Autobiographical Memory[M]. England: Cambridge University Press,1986
    [14]Buehlman, Gottman,&Katz. How a couple views their past predicts their future:Predicting divorce from an oral history interview[J]. Journal of Family Psychology,1992,5,295-318
    [15]Burr, Vivien. Social Constructionism[M]. Routledge,2003
    [16]Carstensen. Motivation for social contact across the life span: A theory of socio-emotionalselectivity. In Jacobs(ED), Nebraska symposium on motivation, Lincoln: University ofNevraska,209-254
    [17]Cedric Lemogne, Pascale Piolino, Stephanie Friszer etal. Episodic autobiographicalmemory in depression: Specificity, autonoetic consciousness, and self-perspective[J].Consciousness and Cognition,2006,15,258-268
    [18]Clark, Collins,&Henry. Biasing effects of retrospective reports on currentself-assessments[J]. In Schwarz&Sudman (Eds). Autobiographical memory and thevalidity of retrospective reports, New York: Springer Verlag,1994,291-304
    [19]Cohen, Conway,&Maylor. Flashbulb memories in older adults[J]. Psychology and Aging,1994,9,454-463
    [20]Collins,&Gould. Getting to know you: How own age and other’s age relate toself-disclosure[J]. International Journal of Aging&Human Development,1994,39,55-66
    [21]Conway. Autobiographical memories and autobiographical knowledge[J]. In: Rubin (Ed.).Remembering our past: Studies in autobiographical memory. Cambridge: CambridgeUniversity Press,1996,67~93
    [22]Craik,&Lockhart. Levels of processing: A framework for memory research[J]. Journal ofVerbal Learning and Verbal Behavior,1972,11(6),671-684
    [23]Crovitz, Schiffiman. Frequency of episodic memories as a function of their age[J].Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,1974,4,517-518
    [24]Cully, LaVoie,&Gfeller. Reminiscence, personality, and psychological functioning inolder adults[J]. The Gerontologist,2001,41,89-95
    [25]Czienskowski, Giljohann. Intimacy, concreteness, and the “self-reference effect”[J].Experimental Psychology,2002,49,73-79
    [26]Dan McAdams, Jack Bauer et al. Continuity and Change in the Life Story: A LongitudinalStudy of Autobiographical Memories in Emerging Adulthood[J]. Journal of Personality,2006,(10),1371-1400
    [27]Davis. Gender differences in autobiographical memory for childhood emotionalexperiences[J]. Journal of Personality&Social Psychology,1999,76,498-510
    [28]Dixon,&Gould. Adults telling and retelling stories collaboratively[J]. In Baltes&Staudinger (Eds.), Interactive minds: Life-span perspectives on the social foundation ofcognition,1996, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,221-241
    [29]Dixon,&Gould. Younger and older adults collaborating on retelling everyday stories[J].Applied Developmental Science,1998,2,160-171
    [30]Donna Rose Addis, Alana. Wong, Daniel. Schacter. Remembering the past and imaginingthe future: Common and distinct neural substrates during event construction andelaboration[J]. Neuropsychologia,2007,45,1363-1377
    [31]Eimas,&Quinn. Studies on the formation of perceptually based basic-level categories inyoung infant[J]. Child Development,1994,65,903-917
    [32]Ed Watkins, John Teasdale. Adaptive and maladaptive self-focus in depression[J]. Journalof Affective Disorders,2004,82,1-8
    [33]Erikson. Childhood and Society[M]. Norton&Company, Inc,1963
    [34]Farrant,&Reese. Maternal style and children’s participation in reminiscing: Steppingstones in children’s autobiographical memory development[J]. Journal of Narrative andLife History,2000,1,193-225
    [35]Filip Raes&Dirk Hermans, Mark,, Williams, Paul Eelen. A sentence completionprocedure as an alternative to the Autobiographical Memory Test for assessingovergeneral memory in non-clinical populations[J]. Memory,2007,15(5),495-507
    [36]Fivush, Gray,&Thomhoff. Two-year-olds talk about the past[J]. Cognitive Development,1987,(2),393-409
    [37]Fivush,&Nelson. Parent-child reminiscing locates the self in the past[J]. British Journalof Developmental Psychology,2006,24,235-251
    [38]Gallagher. Philosophical conceptions of the self: Implications for cognitive science[J].Trends in Cognitive Sciences,2000,4(1),14-21
    [39]Gallup. Chimpanzees: Self-recognition[J]. Science,1970,167,86-87
    [40]Gergen. Social Constrctionist Movement in Modern Psychology[M]. AmericanPsychologist,3
    [41]Gergen. The place of the psyche in a constructed world[J]. Theory&Psychoanalysis, InKvale (Ed), Psychology and postmodernism, London: Sage,1992
    [42]Gergen. The Saturated Self Dilemmas of Identity in Contemporary Life[M]. America:Basicbooks,1991
    [43]Gergen. An invitation to Social Construction[M]. London: Sage,1999Gergen. The social constructionist movement in modern psychology[J]. AmericanPsychologist,1985,40(3)
    [44]Gergen. Construction in Contention: Toward Consequential Resolutions[M]. Theory&Psychology, Vol.11(3)
    [45]Gillihan, Farah. Is self special? A critical review of evidence from experimentalpsychology and cognitive neuroscience[J]. Psychological bulletin,2005,131(1),76-97
    [46]Habermas,&Bluck. Getting a life: The development of the life story in adolescence[J].Psychological Bulletin,2000,126,748-769
    [47]Haden,&Fivush. Contextual variation in maternal conversational styles[J].Merrill-Palmer Quarterly,1996,42,200-227
    [48]Hashtroudi, Johnson,&Chrosniak. Aging and qualitative characteristics of memories forperceived and imagined complex events[J]. Psychology and Aging,1990,5,119-126
    [49]Hirst,&Manier. Remembering as communication: A family recounts its past[J]. In Rubin(Ed.), Remembering our past: Studies in autobiographical memory, New York:Cambridge University Press,1996,271-290
    [50]Howe,&Courage. On resolving the enigma of infantile amnesia[J]. PsychologicalBulletin,1993,113(2),305-326
    [51]Howe,&Courage. The emergence and early development of autobiographical memory[J].Psychological Review,1997,104(3),499-523
    [52]Hyman. Conversational remembering-story recall with a peer versus for anexperimenter[J]. Applied Cognitive Psychology,1994,8,49-66
    [53]Ian M. Davison, Aidan Feeney. Regret as autobiographical memory[J]. CognitivePsychology,2008,57,385-403
    [54]Ineke Wessel, Beatrijs. Hauer. Retrieval-induced forgetting of autobiographical memorydetails[J]. Cognition and Emotion,2006,20(3/4),430-447
    [55]James. The principles of psychology (Vol.1)[M]. New York: Holt,1890
    [56]Karney,&Coombs. Memory bias in long-term close relationships: Consistency orimprovement?[J]. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,2000,26,959-970
    [57]Kate. McLean, Monisha Pasupathi, Jennifer. Pals. Selves creating stories creating selves:A process model of self-development[J]. Personality and Social Psychology Review,2008,(10),262-278
    [58]Katherine Nelson. Self and social functions: Individual autobiographical memory andcollective narrative[J]. Memory,2003,11(2),125-136
    [59]Kircher&Leube. Self-consciousness, self-agency, and schizophrenia[J]. Consciousnessand Cognition,2003,12(4),264-272
    [60]Kuiper, Rogers. Encoding of personal information: Self-other differences[J]. Journal ofPersonality and Social Psychology,1979,37(4),499-514
    [61]Laurenceau, Barrett,&Pietromonaco. Intimacy as interpersonal process: The importanceof self-disclosure, partner disclosure, and perceived partner responsiveness ininterpersonal exchanged[J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,1998,74,1238-1251
    [62]Lord. Schemas and images as memory aids: Two modes of processing socialinformation[J].Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,1980,38(2),257-269
    [63]Lusia, Jenkins. Images of the self in social anxiety: Effects on the retrieval ofautobiographical memories[J]. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry,2007,38,459-473
    [64]Macrae,&Roseveare. I was always on my mind: The self and temporary forgetting[J].Psychonomic Bulletin&Review,2002,9(3),611-614
    [65]Manstesd, Hewstone. The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Social Psychology[M]. Cambrige,MA: Basil Blackwell,1995
    [66]Mark. Leary, June Price Tangney. Handbook of self and identity[M]. The Guilford press,New York London,2005,3-14
    [67]Mark, Williams, Stella Chan, Catherine Crane,&Thorsten Barnhofer. Retrieval ofautobiographical memories: The mechanisms and consequences of truncated search[J].Cognition and Emotion,2006,20(3/4),351-382
    [68]Mark Williams, Thorsten Barnhofer,&Catherine Crane, Dirk Hermans,&Filip Raes, EdWatkins, Tim Dalglersh. Autobiographical memory specificity and emotional disorder[J].Psychological Bulletin,2007,133(1),122-148
    [69]Markus&Kitayama. Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, andmotivation[J]. Psychological Review,1991,31(6),537-543
    [70]Markus, Kitayama. Culture and self: Implications for cognition, emotion, andmotivation[J]. Psychological Review,1991,98(2),224-253
    [71]McAdams, Diamond,&Mansfield. Stories of commitment: The psychosocialconstruction of generative lives[J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,1997,72,678-694
    [72]McAdams, Anyidoho, Brown, Huang, Kaplan,&Machado. Traits and stories: Linksbetween dispositional and narrative features of personality[J]. Journal of Personality,2004,72,761-784
    [73]Michaela. Swales,&Mark. Williams, Pam Wood. Specificity of autobiographicalmemory and mood disturbance in adolescents[J]. Cognition and Emotion,2001,15(3),321-331
    [74]Neisser. Five kinds of self knowledge [J]. Philosophical Psychology,1988,1,37-59
    [75]Nigro,&Neisser. Point of view in personal memories[J]. Cognitive Psychology,1983,15,467-482
    [76]Pasupathi, Stallworth,&Murdoch. How what we tell becomes what we know: Listenereffects on speaker’s long-term memory for events[J]. Discourse Processes,1998,26,1-25
    [77]Pasupathi, Carstensen, Levenson,&Gottman. Responsive listening in long marriedcouples: A psycholinguistic perspective[J]. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior,1999,23,173-193
    [78]Pasupathi. The social construction of the personal past and its implications for adultdevelopment[J]. Psychological Bulletin,2001,127,651-672
    [79]Pasupathi, Lucas,&Coombs. Functions of autobiographical memory in discourse:Long-married couples talk about conflicts and pleasant topics[J]. Discourse Processes,2002,34,163-192
    [80]Paul Burgess&Tim Shallice. Confabulation and the Control of Recollection[J]. Memory,1996,4(4),359-411
    [81]Pierre Philippot, Alexandre Schaefer&Gwenola Herbette. Consequences of specificprocessing of emotional information: Impact of general versus specific autobiographicalmemory priming on emotion elicitation[J]. Emotion, Schematic versus propositionalprocessing,2003,1-40
    [82]Pillemer. Remembering personal circumstances: A functional analysis[M]. In Winograd&Neisser(Eds.), Affect and accuracy in recall: Studies of “flashbulb” memories, New York:Cambridge University Press,1992,236-264
    [83]Pillemer. Momentous events, vivid memories[M]. Cambridge, MA: Harvard UniversityPress,1998
    [84]Pillemer. Remembering personal circumstances: A functional analysis[M]. New York:Cambridge University Press,1999
    [85]Piolino, Hisland,I. Ruffeveille, Matuszewski et al. Do school-age children remember orknow the person past?[J]. Consciousness and Cognition,2007,16,84-101
    [86]Reese,&Fivush. Parental styles of talking about the past[J]. Developmental Psychology,1993,29,596-606
    [87]Rogers, Kuiper, Kirker. Self-reference and the encoding of personal information[J].Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,1977,35,677-688
    [88]Ross&Holmberg. Are wives’ memories for events in relationships more vivid than theirhusbands’ memories?[J]. Journal of Social&Personal Relationships,1992,9,585-604
    [89]Rubin. The distribution of early childhood memories[J]. Memory,2000,8(3),265~269
    [90]Sally. Moore,&Lori. Overgeneral Autobiographical Memory and Traumatic Events: AnEvaluative Review[J]. Psychological Bulletin,2007,133(3),419-437
    [91]Siegfried. Sporer,&Stefanie, Sharman. Should I Believe This? Reality Monitoring ofAccounts of Self-Experienced and Invented Recent and Distant AutobiographicalEvents[J]. Applied Cognitive Psychology,2006,20,837-854
    [92]Tannen. You just don’t understand: Women and men in conversation[M]. New York:Ballantine,1990
    [93]Timothy. Ritchie, John. Skowronski, Sarah E. Wood. Event Self-Importance, EventRehearsal, and the Fading Affect Bias in Autobiographical Memory[J]. Self and Identity,2006,5,172-195
    [94]Tulving. Elements of Episodic Memory[M]. New York:Oxord University,1983
    [95]Webster. Adult age differences in reminiscence functions. In Haight&Wevster (Eds.),The art and science of reminiscing: Theory, research, methods, and applications.Washington, DC: Taylor&Francis,1995
    [96]West,&Bauer. Assumptions of infantile amnesia: Are there differences between early andlater memories?[J]. Memory,1999,7(3),257~278
    [97]Williams, Broadbent. Autobiographical memory in suicide attempters[J]. Journal ofAbnormal Psychology,1986,95,144-149
    [98]Williams J, Dritschel B. Emotional disturbance and the specificity of autobiographicalmemory[J]. Cognition and Emotion,1988,2,221-234
    [99]Williams, Nick. Ellis, Claire,&Helen. The specificity of autobiographical memory andimage ability of the future[J]. Memory and Cognition,1996,24(1),116-125
    [100]Williams, Barnhoger, Hermans et al. Autobiographical memory specificity andEmotional Disorder[J]. Psychological Bulletin,2007,133(1),122-148
    [101]Willem Kuyken,&Howell. Facets of autobiographical memory in adolescents withmajor depressive disorder and never-depressed controls[J]. Cognition and Emotion,2000,20(3/4),466-487
    [102]Wilson,&Ross. The identity function of autobiographical memory: Time is on ourside[J]. Memory,2003,11,137-149