摘要
本论文根据国内外正在兴起的治理理论和方法,在比较全面、深入分析了国内外治理理论和实践的基础上,结合集体林区社会、经济、自然、特别是森林资源的特点和集体林区森林治理方面存在的问题,提出了对森林善治进行研究和实践,对集体林区森林善治理论及其组成要素进行了探讨。
论文确定了以森林善治相关理论及其组成要素为主要研究内容,以我国南方集体林区为面,贵州等相关区域为点,点面结合,采取引进、消化吸收、创新的方式,调查、分析、综合的方法进行研究的技术路线,为本研究奠定了基础。论文在对研究成果进行分析的基础上,主要论述了下列内容:
论文对我国集体林区森林资源的特点、地位和作用,以及森林资源管理现状进行了阐述,结合社会发展对森林资源的要求和任务,重点分析了我国集体林区森林资源管理存在的主要问题,探讨了改进森林资源管理的迫切性,提出了森林善治可以作为改进集体林区森林资源管理,实现科学经营的一个途径。
论文总结了集体林区森林善治的概念、目标、意义和内容,提出集体林区森林善治是以和谐为目标、协调为手段、兼顾各方面利益,促进林区人民持续增收、林区社会发展、森林资源稳定、健康、可持续,发挥最大功能和效益的理念与模式。
论文分析了集体林区森林善治总体构成、组成要素及其关系和存在的问题。在此基础上,分别对政府、企业、个人和第三部门等主要的组成要素的地位、作用和主要问题进行了比较深刻而广泛的论述,为进一步研究、探讨解决对策奠定了基础。
论文进一步探讨了实施集体林区森林善治的对策,分别在科学经营和管理森林资源、转变政府职能、培育富有竞争力和社会责任感的企业和林农、发展规范运作的第三部门、加强政府、企业(个人)和第三部门的合作等方面提出了符合集体林区森林管理实际和需要的具有可操作性的解决方法。
论文最后对所研究的内容、提出的观点、方法进行了概括和讨论,并指出了研究存在的不足。
The paper discussed the theory of good governance in collective forest area and its component elements. The governance theory and its method are on the rise both in domestic and foreign research, but the paper extended the discussion to society, economy, and nature in collective forest area, and especially to the forest resources characters, which make it a valuable contribution in both theory research and operation guidance in the matter of the followings: to enrich the idea and the content in forest resources management, to realize the scientific concept of development of forest resources management, to promote the harmonious and coordinated connection among various essential factors in forest resources management, and further to coordinate and mutually promote the development of forest resources and the development of society, economy, environment, and the nature.
Based on a comprehensive and thorough analysis both domestic and foreign governance theory and practice, the paper practically analyzed the problems in collective forest area government and proposed the research theory and practice method on good governance for collective forest area. The research in the paper covered large collective forest area in southern China with aggregated data and relatively small collective forest area in Guizhou with detail data, and illustrates the application of local experience to the entire area. With introduction and absorption of new theory, in an innovation way, the paper conducted investigation, analysis, and synthesis in technical method, and mainly elaborated the following subjects:
The paper described the characters, the status, the functions and the current government practice in collective forest area in China, analyzed the existing issues in these areas in the wave of requests to forest resource along the social and economic development, discussed the urgency to improve forest resources management, and proposed good governance as a scientific way to amend collective forest area management.
The paper summarized the concept, the goal, the significance and the content of good governance in collective forest area, and proposed the most efficient idea and models to sustainably increase income for people in the forest area, and develop forest area society in stable, healthy and sustainable methods, by taking the harmony as the goal, by taking coordination as the way, and by properly handling benefits among various parties.
The paper analyzed the overall constitution, the component elements and their relations, and the existing issues of good governance in collective forest area, and fully and profoundly discussed the status, the function and the major issues for government, enterprise, individual and the third party as main component elements, which established the foundation on further study of solutions.
Moreover, the paper discussed the policy to implement good governance in collective forest area, and proposed the policy to coordinate various parities and to promote harmonious development. Based on this, the paper concluded with feasible solutions to practically conform the development in collective forest area: scientific concept of development and management on forest resources, transformation of government functions, cultivation of competitive enterprise (individual) with social responsibilities, development of the third party to follow standard regulation, and enhancement on cooperation among the government, the enterprise (individual) and the third party.
The paper finally concluded with ideas and methods on good governance in collective forest area by summarizing analysis of governance theory and good governance theory, society and economy development in collective forest area, the status of forest resources, constitution and component elements analysis of good governance in collective forest area, the existing issues and countermeasures, and the shortcoming of the research respectively.
引文
[1][英]鲍勃·杰索普.治理的兴起及其失败的风险:以经济发展为例的论述[J].俞可平.治理与善治[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2000:52-86.
[2]陈晓倩,陈建成.生态林业市场化筹资方式的思考[J].林业经济问题,2002,(1):19-21.
[3]陈幸良.中国林业产权制度的特点、问题和改革对策[J].世界林业研究,2003(12):27-31.
[4]陈国明.市场经济条件下林业改革的思路[J].林业经济,1994,(6):19-22.
[5]陈晓倩 孙昌金.论财政分权与林业税费改革[J].林业经济,2003,(6):28-31.
[6]陈晓倩.林业可持续发展中的资金运行机制[M].北京:中国林业出版社,2002:69.
[7]陈大夫.环境与资源经济学.北京:经济科学出版社,2001.
[8]程同顺.中国农民组织化研究初探[M].天津:天津人民出版社,2003:16.
[9]程祀国.从管理到治理:观念、逻辑、方法[J].南京社会科学,2001,(9):47-50
[10]戴广翠,徐晋涛等.中国集体林产权现状及安全性研究[J].林业经济,2002(11):30-33.
[11]丁胜,马天乐.江苏省建设林业社会化服务体系的探讨[J].林业经济问题,2003,(5):266-269.
[12]丰存斌.试论第三部门在我国兴起的意义[J].中共山西省委党校学报,2005,(2):34-35.
[13]甘培忠.企业与公司法学(第1版)[M].北京:北京大学出版社,1998:3-4.
[14]国家发展与改革委员会经济体制综合改革司.国际研讨会综述[J],范恒山.事业单位改革:国家经验与中国探索[M].北京:中国财政经济出版社,2004:77-85.
[15]国家林业局.2005中国林业发展报告[M].北京:中国林业出版社,2006.
[16]国家林业局林业资源管理司.全国森林资源统计(1994-1998),2000.
[17]国家林业局.中国森林资源报告(2005)[M].北京:中国林业出版社,2005:2-11.
[18]国家林业局.中国林业统计年鉴(2005)[M].北京:中国林业出版社,2006.
[19]国家环境保护总局自然生态保护司.全国自然保护区名录(2005)[M].北京:中国环境出版社,2006:1-7.
[20]贵州省统计局,国家统计局调查队.贵州统计年鉴[M].北京:中国统计出版社,2007.
[21][英]格里·斯托克.作为理论的治理:五个论点[J].俞可平.治理与善治[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2000:31-52.
[22]贺庆棠.森林环境学[M].北京:高等教育出版社,1999.
[23]回良玉.推进集体林权制度改革,确保农民得实惠生态受保护[J].林业经济,2006,(10):3.
[24]胡锦涛.高举中国特色社会主义伟大旗帜,为夺取全面建设小康社会新胜利而奋斗-在中国共产党第十七次全国代表大会上的报告[M].北京:人民出版社,2007:16.
[25]胡伟.第三部门内涵探析[J].前沿,2004,(2):174-176.
[26]弗朗索瓦-格扎维安·梅理安.治理问题与现代福利国家[J].俞可平.治理与善治[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2000:6.
[27]黄德发.政府治理范式的制度选择[M].广州:广东人民出版社,2005:196-197,289.
[28]江兴龙,罗明灿等.贵州森林分权管理政策效果及改善策略探析[J].林业经济,2001,(1):47-51.
[29]姜杰,朱青梅.公共经济[M].济南:山东人民出版社,2006:31,38-50.
[30]贾治邦.集体林权制度改革给我们的几点启示[J].林业经济,2006,(6):5.
[31]贾治邦.大力推进林业又快又好发展,发挥林业在建设节约型社会中的作用[J].林业经济,2006.(11):6.
[32]蒋晓辉,黄强.关中水资源与社会、经济、环境协调发展模式研究[J].中国农村水利水电,2001,(1):21-24.
[33]蒋敏元.林业经济管理[M].北京:中国林业出版社,2000.
[34]孔凡斌.商品林市场化经营与政府管理职能改革[J].世界林业研究,2004,(2).
[35][德]柯武刚,史漫飞.制度经济学[M].北京:商务印书馆,2002:35.
[36]雷家富.深刻理解相持阶段的基本内涵,准确把握新时期林业发展的战略重点[J].绿色中国B版,2005,(4):5-6.
[37]李岩.林业产业的公共性与林业的税费改革[J].学术交流,2004,(4).
[38]李周.市场与林业[J].林业经济,1997,(6):20-25.
[39]李周等.森林资源丰富地区的贫困问题研究[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,2004:72.
[40]李新,余翔华.林改后构建新型林业科技服务体系的思考,林业经济,2006,(8)江西专刊:43-46.
[41]李维长.“社区共管”将成为自然保护区管理的先进模式[J].林业与社会,2002,(5):18
[42]李占祥.积极创建社会主义企业管理学[J].经济理论与经济管理.1984,(4):26-31.
[43]李锴,张明.我国森林采伐限额制度面临的问题及其解决措施[J].江西社会科学,2004,(12):242-246.
[44]刘金龙,叶敬忠,郑宝华.影响农民参与森林经营的因素[J].2000,(12):62-68.
[45]刘德弟,沈月琴,李兰英.市场经济下林业社会化服务体系建设研究[J].2001,(2):24-27.
[46]刘德弟,李兰英,刘跃钧等.林业产业化与社会化服务研究[J].华东森林经理,2001,(3):9-12.
[47]刘兆发.农村非正式结构的经济分析[M].北京:经济管理出版社,2002:32.
[48]刘星.论第三部门与公共权力的关系[J].江海学刊,2003,(3):112-116.
[49]刘静仑.第三部门的作用[J].经济论坛,2002,(19):8.
[50]刘燕 田明华.关于森林认证本质的探讨[J].林业经济,2006,(4):32.
[51]刘璨,马天乐等.社区林业发展论[M].北京:中国林业出版社,1999.
[52]刘璨等,集体林产权制度分析-安排、变迁与绩效[J].林业经济,2006,(11):9.
[53]刘璨等,集体林产权制度分析-安排、变迁与绩效续一[J].林业经济,2006,(12):36-39,62.
[54]刘金龙,刘金富等.中国南方集体林区林业税费问题与改革[M].北京:中国林业出版社,2002.
[55]龙春林,杨昌岩.侗族传统社会林业研究[M].昆明:云南科技出版社,2003:51-54.
[56]赖庆奎,李建钦.论社区林业的组织机构建设[J].林业与社会,2003,(6):1-5.
[57]卢现祥.西方新制度经济学(修订版)[M].北京:中国发展出版社,2003:204-205.
[58][美]罗西瑙.21世纪的治理[J].全球治理,1995,创刊号.
[59][英]罗伯特·罗茨.新的治理[J].俞可平.治理与善治[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2000:86-106.
[60]林迎星.现代工业人工林发展的创新研究[M].北京:中国林业出版社,2000.
[61]陆文明,[英]Natasha Landell-Mills.中国私营林业政策研究[M].北京:中国环境科学出版社,2002.
[62]莱斯特·萨拉蒙.第三域的兴起[M].上海:复旦大学出版社,1998
[63]马爱国.我国的林业政策过程-由单主体政策过程向多主题政策过程的转变[M].北京:中国林业出版社,2003.
[64][法]玛丽-克劳德.斯莫茨.治理在国际关系中的应用[J].俞可平.治理与善治[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2000:263-280.
[65]毛寿龙.西方政府的治道变革[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,1998:7.
[66]彭友贵,龙德武.论乡村参与性森林经营管理[J].林业经济问题,2003,(2):78-91.
[67]彭泽元.林业股份合作制-集体林区林业可持续发展的最佳选择和有效途径---锦屏县集体林区实行林业股份合作制改革的实践.农村经济与技术,2000,(8):6-8.
[68]全球治理委员会.我们的全球伙伴关系[M].牛津大学出版社,1995.
[69]黔东南苗族侗族自治州地方志编纂委员会.黔东南州志.林业志[M].北京:中国林业出版社,1990:179-180.
[70]邱俊齐.林业经济学[M].北京:中国林业出版社,1999.
[71]沈荣华,周义程.善治理论与我国政府改革的有限性导向[J].理论探讨,2003,(5):5-6.
[72]宋元媛,曾寅初,王兆君.采伐限额政策对非公有制林业的影响[J].林业经济,2003,(9):35-36.
[73]孙昌金,陈晓倩.中国森林生态效益补偿基金(机制)政策剖析,《生态环境效益补偿政策和国际经验研讨会论文集》[J].北京:中国林业出版社,2002.
[74]田明华,张卫民,陈建成.我国森林采伐限额政策评价[J].中国人口、资源与环境,2003,(1):118-120.
[75]田明华,陈建成.中国森林资源管理变革趋向:市场化研究[M].北京:中国林业出版社,2003:32-38.
[76]滕世华.治理理论与政府改革[J].福建行政学院福建经济管理干部学院学报,2002,(3):38-43.
[77]汪向阳,胡春阳.治理:当代公共管理理论的新热点[J].复旦学报(社会科学版),2000,(4):136-140.
[78]汪绚等.中国林业的半壁江山,“三农”问题的重要领域-集体林区林业改革与发展政策调研总报告[J].集体林区林业改革与发展课题组.集体林区林业改革与发展纪实[M].北京:中国林业出版社,2002:4-6.
[79]汪绚等.深化改革,再度解放林业生产力,兴林致富,建设社会主义新农村--集体林权制度调研报告[J].国家林业局政策法规司2006:1-31.
[80]吴水荣.森林部门权力下放的路径与缺陷[J].世界林业动态,2005,(11):5.
[81]温作民.森林生态建设中若干经济因素分析[J].林业经济,2001,(9):30-34.
[82]温作民,吕柳.木材收购体制改革构想[J].林业经济,1994,(4):27-29.
[83]吴伟光,黄国卫.乡村林业社会化综合服务体系及其经济效果分析[J].华东森林经理,2002,(4):5-8.
[84]王绍光.分权的底线.[M].北京,中国计划出版社,1997:19-28.
[85]王登举.我国林业合作组织发展现状与对策[J].林业经济,2006,(5):65-69.
[86]王小龙.经济转型与激励机制-政府治理与私人交易中的契约设计[M].北京:经济科学出版社,2005:116-123.
[87]王雅莉,毕乐强.公共规制经济学(第二版)[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2005:18-19.
[88]王俊豪.政府管制经济学导论[M].北京:商务印书馆,2001:1.
[89]魏涛.公共治理理论研究综述[J].资料通讯,2006(7,8):56-61.
[90]辛西娅·休伊特·德·阿尔坎塔拉.“‘治理'概念的运用与滥用”[J].国际社会科学杂志(中文版),1999,(2).
[91]夏郁芳.努力提高森林生态效益补偿的科学性[J].中国林业,2003,(12):30-31.
[92]谢罗奇.市场失灵与政府治理-政府经济职能与行为研究[M].长沙:湖南人民出版社,2005:18-19.
[93]肖兴威.完善森林资源管理制度,促进林业持续快速发展[J].国家林业局资源司.森林经营管理研究[M].北京:中国林业出版社,2005:9-18.
[94]许向阳等.政府在林业合作组织发展中的角色定位的研究.林业经济,2007,(2):52-56.
[95]燕继荣.论政治合法性的意义和实现途径[J].学海,2004,(4):88-97.
[96]印中华.我国大量进口木材的利弊分析[J].林业经济,2006,(9):47-51.
[97]俞可平.治理与善治[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2000:1-15.
[98]俞可平.社会公平和善治是建设和谐社会的两大基石[J].北京市社会科学界联合会.和谐社会:公共性与公共治理[M].北京:北京师范大学出版社,2005:37-50.
[99][美]詹姆斯·N·罗西瑙.没有政府的治理[M].南昌:江西人民出版社,2001.
[100]庄洁.“社会资本”理论研究综述[J].发展论坛,2003,(1):79-80.
[101]朱洪革.政府介入林业的分析[J].林业财务与会计,2003,(9):13-15.
[102]张蕾,程鹏.政府在生态环境建设中的作用[J].林业经济,2002,(7,8):40-42,26-30.
[103]张敏新,肖平.政府干预林业的理论支持--政府对林业干预问题的研究之一[J].林业经济问题研究,1997,(5):6-11.
[104]张敏新,肖平.政府干预林业的途径分析--政府对林业干预问题的研究之二[J].林业经济问题研究,1997,(6):1-6.
[105]张建国,张三.工业人工林发展研究[J].福建林学院学报,2000,(3):193-198.
[106]张得才,高岚.关于速生丰产林建设融资模式的若干思考[J].森林工程,2004,(5):27-29.
[107]朱永杰.在生态公益林经营中引进市场机制的思考[J].林业经济问题,1998,(2):36-39.
[108]左停.社会林业实践中制度层面的若干问题[J].中国农村经济,1999,(11):19-24.
[109]左停.中国农村环境资源的非集中化治理的绩效与利益相关群体分析-概念、背景与在中国云南的案例研究[J].华中师范大学学报(人文社会科学版),2004,(2):21-25.
[110]左停.我国农村环境资源管理的非集中化实践--概念、背景与案例实证研究[J].农村经济,2004,(3):5-8.
[111]郑宇,肖平.林农参与林业投资的障碍分析[J].绿色中国,2005,(5):39-41.
[112]郑宝华.谁是社区森林的管理主体-社区森林资源权属与自主管理研究[M].北京:民族出版社.2003:43-46.
[113]张愈强.论政府在非公有制林业中的角色与作用[J].绿色中国B版,2005,(4):31-34.
[114]张慧平,郑小贤.现代林业与林业生态文化探讨[J].林业经济,2007,(3):22-25.
[115]张道卫.为什么中国的许多林地不长树?[J].管理世界,2001,(3):141-146.
[116]中华人民共和国林业部.全国森林资源统计(1989-1993)[M].1994.
[117]中华人民共和国林业部.全国森林资源统计(1984-1988)[M].1989.
[118]中国(海南)改革发展研究院.中国民间组织的现状、作用和问题分析与建议[J].民间组织发展与建设和谐社会[M].北京:中国经济出版社,2006:30-33.
[119]钟艳.林业社会化服务体系的问题与对策探讨.绿色中国B版,2005,(4):47-49.
[120]曾玉林.中国林业社会化发展的制度要素分析[J].林业经济,2007,(2):37-41.
[121]周经纬.公益林“市场失灵”与政府宏观调控的经济分析.江西林业科技,2004,(1):6-8.
[122]植草益.微观规制经济学[M].北京:中国发展出版社,1992:27-28.
[123]Asia Forest Network.Community forest management policies and practice:Future directions for Southeast Asia.AFN Regional Meeting[J],Chiang Mai,Thailand,2003,(11):12-14.
[124]Asian development bank.Forest Policy(working paper)[J]2003.
[125]CIFOR.Decentralization,federal systems in forestry and national forest programs:Report of a workshop co-organized by the governments of Indonesia and Switzerland [J]."The Interlaken Workshop," 27-30 April 2004,Interlaken,Switzerland.CIFOR,Bogor.(http://www.cifor.cgiar.org/publications/pdf_files/interlaken/Final_int erlaken_report.pdf) 2004.
[126]Contreras,A.(ed).Creating Space for Local Forest Management in the Philippines [J].David Edmunds,Eva Wollenberg.Local Forest Management[M].UK and USA:Earthscan Publication Ltd,2003,127-150.
[127]Celia Futemma.Forest Governance at the Household Level:A Case Study from the Lower Amazon Region.[J].The 8th Biennial Conference of the International Association for the Study of Common Property(IASCP)May 31-June 4,2000Bloomington,IN
[128]David Edmunds,Eva Wollenberg.Local Forest Management[M].UK and USA:Earthscan Publication Ltd,2003.
[129]Dupar,M.and N.Badenoch.Environment,Livelihoods and Local Institutions:Decentralization in Mainland Southeast Asia[J].World Resources Institute,Washington,D.C.2002.
[130]David Brown & Cecilia Luttrell with Anne Casson,Rex Cruz and Tim Fomete.Forest Law Enforcement & Governance:The role of independent monitors in the control of forest crime[J].ODI Forestry Brief,2004,(5).
[131]Enters,T.,P.B.Durst and M.Victor(eds).Decentralization and Devolution of Forest Management in Asia and the Pacific.RECOFTC Report No.18[J].Bangkok:RAP Publication,2000.
[132]Eva Wollenberg,Jon Anderson and Citlalli Lopez..Though all things differ.Pluralism as a basis for cooperation in forests.[J].Bogor Barat.Indonesia:Center for International Forestry Research,2005.
[133]Frances J.Seymour.Aligning Good Forest Policy and A Good Governance.Forest law Enforcement and Governance [J]. East Asia Regional Ministerial conference September 11-13, 2001.
[134] Goran Hyden, Julius Court and Kenneth Mease: "WGA" (World Governance Assessment) [M]. www. odi. org. uk/WGA-Governance/Indicators. html. 2002.
[135] Gerardo Segura. Forest Policy and Certification: the Role of Governments. Symposium on forest certification in developing and transitioning societies: social ecological and economic effects. [J].Yale school of forestry and environmental studies.Haven. Connecticut. Newjune , 2004: 10-11.
[136] Iied. "Pyramid-a diagnostic and planning tool for good forest governance" [M]. www. iied. org.
[137] Jules N. Pretty. Participatory Learning for sustainable agriculture [J]. World Development, 1995, (23):1247-1263.
[138] Karl Hogl, Eva Kvarda, Ralf Nordbeck, Michael Pregernig, Wien. Vorstelllung des Projektvorhabens. New Modes of governance for Sustainable Forestry in Europe. [M].37. GoFOR Forst politikertreffen, Hamburg, April 2005.
[139] Kuldip Poudel. Public hearing and public auditing in Community Forest Users Groups, A pivotal tool for operationalizing good governance practices at grassroots level[J]. 2004.
[140] Liu Dachang and David Edmunds. Devolution as a Means of Expanding Local Forest Management in South China. [J]. in Hyde, William F., Brian Belcher, and Xu Jintao (eds.) China' s Forests: Global Lessons from Market Reforms. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future. 2003.
[141] Makarabhirom, P. Fatal struggle for Thailand' s community forests. [J]. In: Community Forests in Review. Bulletin of the Global Caucus on Community Based Forest Management. 2004, Fall (http://www.gccbfm.org).
[142] Meinzen-Dick, R. and A. Knox. Collective Action, Property Rights and Devolution of Natural Resources Management: A Conceptual Framework. [J]. In: R. Meinzen-Dick, A. Knox and M. Di Gregorio (eds) Collective Action, Property Rights and Devolution of Natural Resource Management: Exchange of Knowledge and Implications for Policy. Proceedings of the International Conference held in Puerto Azul, Philippines, 21-25 June 1999. DSE/ZEL, Feldafing. 2001
[143] Patrick B. Durst, Philip McKenzie, Chris L. Brown and Simmathiri Appanah. Challenges facing certification and eco- labeling of forest products in developing countries[J]. 2005.2
[144] RECOFTC. Vietnam: Forest development bill must ensure owners' interests. [J]. In Community Forestry E-News 2004.10.31.
[145] Ribot, J. C. Waiting for Democracy: The Politics of Choice in Natural Resource Decentralizations [M]. World Resources Institute, Washington, D.C. 2004(http://pubs.wri. org/pubs_description. cfm?PubID=3821)
[146] Ribot, J.C. and A.M. Larson. Decentralization of Natural Resources: Experiences in Africa, Asia and Latin America. [J]. Routledge, London. 2004.
[147] RECOFTC. The Initiative on Promoting Good Forest Governancein Asia-Pacific. Forests: Used by many, Managed by few, Governed by whom? [J]. A Summary Report from a Workshop held as part of the Global PrepCom IV for WSSDNusa Dua, Bali, Indonesial-2 June 2002.
[148] Shackleton, S., B. Campbell, E. Wollenberg and D. Edmunds. 2002. Devolution and community-based natural resource management: Creating space for local people to participate and benefit? [J]. 0DI Natural Resource Perspectives, 2002, (76).
[149] Suryanata, K., J. Fox and S. Brennan. Issues of centralization and federation in forest governance: Proceedings from the tenth workshop on community-based management of forestlands. [M]. Chiang Mai, Thailand, 30 June-25 July 2003. East-West Center, Hawaii and RECOFTC, Bangkok. 2003.
[150] Timothee Fomet. The forestry taxation system and the involvement of local communities in forest management in Cameroon. [J]. Rural development forestry network, paper, 2001, (25b).
[151] Veer, C. Community based forest management in Asia [J]. Community Forests in Review. Bulletin of the Global Caucus on Community Based Forest Management. Fall 2004. (http://www. gccbfm. org)
[152] White, A. and A. Martin. Who Owns the World' s Forests? Forest Tenure and Public Forests in Transition. [M] Forest Trends and CIEL, Washington, D. C. 2002. fttp://fttp. fao. org/docrep/fao/009/a0773c/a0773c11. pdf
[153] World Resources Institute. Best Practices for Detecting Illegal and Destructive Commercial Logging . Summary workshop report of workshop on promoting transparency in the forest sector [J]. May 29-30 National Conference Center Landsdon, May 31. World Resources Institute Virginia. washiongton. DC .2002.