FDI主导的产业集群和地方产业升级研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
近年來,外商對我國的投資額基本呈現穩步增長的態勢,FDI對我國經濟增長、產業結構調整、地方產業集群發展有著重要的影響。FDI投資主要集中於東部沿海地區,尤其是珠三角、長三角、渤海灣地區更是集中了FDI的大部分。在FDI投資集中的地區,出現了不少FDI主導的產業集群,在這樣的集群中,其內部的主要環節均為外資企業,相互之間保持著密切的業務聯繫,形成一個相對完整的產業鏈,當地企業要麼很難進入,要麼只能進入其中技術含量和附加價值低的環節。一般來說FDI促進當地經濟的發展主要是通過FDI的技術溢出效應,那麼在FDI主導的產業集群中地方產業中本土企業如何利用FDI的技術溢出效應而實現自身的發展升級呢?對於這個問題的研究不但對豐富FDI理論,而且對我國企業在產業升級過程中有著一定的指導意義。
     本文從產業集群、FDI技術溢出效應、產業集群升級理論的角度進行了理論分析,在相關理論分析的基礎上結合蘇州地區FDI實際情況進行了實證分析,檢驗蘇州地區的FDI技術溢出效應和FDI技術轉移行為是否能夠促進當地企業的技術進步。在FDI投資獨資化的趨勢下,本土企業自主創新能力不足、社會信用體系和智慧財產權保護體系不完善、FDI結構封鎖、生產體系封閉性的現實中,本土企業如何才能實現升級並不僅僅是企業自己的問題,也關係到當地經濟發展方式、產業結構調整,所以需要政府發揮其應有的作用。在促進本土企業升級的對策中,主要從以下方面進行:培育國內市場需求突破FDI的結構封鎖,政府進行產業升級規劃,培育本土企業的自主創新能力,發展生產者服務機構。
     本文研究內容分為六章,主要內容如下:
     第一章為文章的研究背景、研究意義、研究方法和研究目標的闡述。
     第二章為相關理論與文獻綜述,主要介紹了產業集群、FDI技術溢出效應、產業集群升級理論。產業集群主要從產業集群的理論溯源、概念界定、形成背景、類型、作用和生命週期等角度進行了研究;FDI技術溢出效應主要從技術溢出效應的界定、技術溢出途徑、技術溢出的制約因素以及相關的實證研究綜述;全球價值鏈理論從理論起源、價值鏈的驅動力及治理結構、價值鏈與產業升級的角度進行了分析。
     第三章為FDI投資分配與地方產業集群的分析,主要從FDI投資分配行為的分析,FDI主導的地方產業集群的形成、類型及特徵,FDI主導產業集群的演進動力機制,以及FDI對地方產業集群的影響進行了分析。
     第四章為FDI技術溢出效應和技術轉移行為分析,從FDI技術溢出效應的機制模型、影響因素、溢出效應度量分析了技術溢出效應;從FDI技術轉移的動因(跨國公司、東道國)、技術轉移的途徑、技術轉移的機理模型以及技術轉移過程中的技術創新機制分析了技術轉移;最後結合蘇州地區進行了技術溢出效應和技術轉移效應的驗證。
     第五章為FDI與地方產業集群升級轉型升級,主要從FDI主導產業集群升級的影響因素、目前在升級中面臨的困境以及如何突破困境而提出的建議對策,文章結合蘇州地區的實際進行了分析,以蘇州工業園區在如何進行轉型升級方面進行了分析。
     第六章為研究結論與對未來的研究建議。
The amount of FDI presents steady-state growth in recent years. FDI plays animportant role to our country`s economical growth, industrial structure adjusting and localindustrial cluster development. FDI fasten on east littoral, especially Pearl RiverDelta,the Yangtze River Delta and the Bohai Rim area. The zone of foreignerinvestment concentrated appears some FDI-led Industrial clusters. The main part of itsinternal foreign enterprises are among the business has maintained close contact,forming arelatively complete industrial chain,local businesses or difficult to access,either of whichcan only enter the technical content and low value-added component. General speaking,FDI accelerating local economical growth is mainly dependent on the Spillover Effect ofFDI, so how do the local enterprise use the spillover effect of FDI to upgrade in theFDI-led Industrial clusters. The study on this problem can not only enrich the FDI theory,but also shepherd local enterprises upgrading practice.
     This article analyses in academic from industrial cluster, spillover effect of FDI andcluster upgrading, which based on it and combined the fact of Suzhou to amylasedemonstration, to checkout the technology spillover effect of FDI to Suzhou and thetechnology diversion behavior has improved local enterprises technical progress. Under thetrend of FDI solely ownership, insufficient of local enterprises innovation ability, imperfectin the social credit system and Intellectual property protection system, the Structural blockof FDI, and Closed production systems, how to upgrade in the global value chain is notonly with relation to local enterprise, but also close to local Economic Development Modeand the adjustment of industrial structure, which needs the local government play its duerole. Such countermeasures as following can upgrade in the global value chain: Cultivatethe domestic market demand to break the Structural block of FDI, industries upgradingplan of local government, cultivate the innovation ability of local enterprises and developthe advanced producer service industry.
     This paper studies the contents is divided into six chapters, main contents are asfollows:
     For the first chapter of the research background, the research significance, theresearch methods and research target of exposition.
     The second chapter for related theory and literature review, mainly introduced theindustry cluster, FDI technology spillover effects, industrial cluster upgrade theory.Industry cluster mainly from industrial cluster theory traceability, concept definition,formation background, type, function and life cycle, the angles FDI technology spillovereffects from the main technological overflow effect definition, technology spillover way,technology spillovers restricting factors and relevant empirical research review; From thetheory of global value chain theory origin, value chain driving force and governancestructure, value chain and industrial upgrade Angle were analyzed.
     The third chapter for FDI investment distribution and local industrial cluster analysis,mainly from the analysis of the distribution of FDI investment behavior, FDI leading placethe formation of industry cluster, the types and characteristics of dominant industry cluster,FDI, and the evolution of dynamic mechanism of local industry cluster of FDIinvestigated.
     The fourth chapter for FDI technology spillover effect and technology transferbehavior analysis, from FDI technology spillover effect mechanism model, the influencefactors, analyzed spillover effect measure technological overflow effect; Technologytransfer from FDI motivations (multinational companies, host country), technology transferapproach, technology transfer mechanism models and technology transfer process oftechnology innovation mechanism analysis technology transfer; Based on the suzhouregion technology spillover effect and technology transfer effect validation.
     The fifth chapter for FDI and local transformation and upgrading of industrial clusterupgrade, mainly from FDI dominant industry cluster of factors, current upgrade inupgrades in the dilemma facing the predicament and how to breakthrough and suggestedcountermeasures, combining with the actual suzhou area are analyzed, in suzhou industrialpark in how to upgrade are analyzed.
     The sixth chapter for research conclusions and Suggestions for future research.
引文
1何雄浪,李国平。产业集群演进机理与区域发展研究[M]中国经济出版社,2009
    [1]万解秋,邱永和。东吴财经商学评论[M]复旦大学出版社2008
    [2]万解秋,徐涛。论FDI国家经济安全[M]复旦大学出版社,2006
    [3]李恒。基于FDl的产业集群研究[M]北京:社会科学文献出版社,2008
    [4]赵增耀,王喜。产业竞争力、企业技术能力与外资的溢出效应——基于我国汽车产业吸收能力的实证分析[J]管理世界,2007(12)
    [5]赵燕,赵增耀。FDI与经济增长:基于金融市场作用机制的研究——中美两国数据的实证检验[J]世界经济研究,2009(2)
    [6]赵增耀,王喜。独资化趋势下FDI对国有企业的溢出效应分析[J]江海学刊,2007(6)
    [7]刘志彪等。长三角区域经济一体化[M]中国人民大学出版社,2010
    [8]刘志彪,郑江淮。和谐与冲突:长三角经济发展经验[M]中国人民大学出版社,2010
    [9]王缉慈,陈平,马铭波。从创新集群的视角略论中国科技园的发展[J]北京大学学报(自然科学版),2010(1)
    [10]何雄浪,李国平。产业集群演进机理与区域发展研究[M]中国经济出版社,2009
    [11]刘志彪,张杰等。全球化中中国东部外向型经济发展:理论分析和战略调整[M]中国财政经济出版社,2009
    [12]王立平,刘志彪,郑江淮。基于苏州产业结构优化升级的人才战略研究[M]经济科学出版社,2009
    [13]刘志彪,江静等。长三角制造业向产业链高端攀升的机制和路径[M]经济科学出版社,2009
    [14]刘志彪,郑江淮。服务业驱动长三角[M]中国人民大学出版社,2008
    [15]盖文启。创新网络——区域解决发展新思维[M]北京大学出版社,2002
    [16]吴德进。产业集群论[M]社会科学文献出版社,2006
    [17]张辉。全球价值链理论与我国产业发展研究[J]中国工业经济,2004(5)
    [18]张辉。全球价值链下地方产业集群升级模式研究[J]中国工业经济,2005(9)
    [19]章宝林,王文平。人力流动对集群升级的作用机制研究[J]软科学,2009(1)
    [20]周晓真。FDI技术外溢机制及影响因素的实证分析——基于广东省行业及城市数据的检验[D]浙江大学硕士论文,2009
    [21]陈超。FDI技术溢出与我国吸收能力的研究——基于地区差异的分析[D]浙江大学硕士论文,2007
    [22]高礼彦,杨阳,秦永强。顾客价值的驱动因素及价值链构建分析[J]经济论坛,2007(6)
    [23]毛锦峰。FDI溢出效应发挥:金融市场作用的实证研究[D]复旦大学硕士论文,2007
    [24]杨阳。FDI的技术溢出效应及影响因素的门槛回归分析[D]浙江大学硕士论文,2008
    [25]吉丹俊。FDI溢出效应及其对本土企业技术能力提升的作用——基于苏州FDI产业集群的分析[D]苏州大学硕士论文,2009
    [26]王莹。FDI主导产业集群的网络治理及其对当地企业在集群中升级的影响研究——以苏州台资笔记本电脑集群为例[D]苏州大学硕士论文,2009
    [27]谭红旭。在华跨国公司股权安排的独资化成因、影响及对策[J]中央财经大学学报,2006(11)
    [28]佐藤宜雄,石永恒,郑仰南。合资企业“独资化"的博弈分析[J]商业研究,2006(7)
    [29]闫立罡,吴贵生。在华跨国公司独资化倾向分析[J]科研管理,2006(7)
    [30]赵增耀。外商在华投资独资化趋势的演化机理及应对策略[J]世界经济研究,2004(4)
    [31]万解秋,刘亮。外资并购与江苏产业升级效应研究[J]苏州大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2008(7)
    [32]王璨。跨国公司在华投资独资化对技术溢出效应的影响[J]财经理论与实践,2006(11)
    [33]李向京,廖进中。跨国公司独资化现象的三重原因分析[J]国际贸易,2006(8)
    [34]徐建牛,孙沛东。行业协会:集群企业集体行动的组织基础[J]浙江学刊,2009(1)
    [35]刘芹。产业集群治理的动力机制和模式研究[J]软科学,2009(1)
    [36]郑建伟,万君康,陈剑锋。基于产业集群的治理结构创新研究[J]武汉理工大学学报(信息与管理工程版),2004(3)
    [37]杨慧。产业集群治理结构探析[J]科学学研究,2007(8)
    [38]朱华友,丁四保。产业集群治理:一个基于浙江省企业社会责任实证的视角[J]经济地理,2006(11)
    [39]焦媛媛,范静燕,李科。中国汽车产业的全球价值链治理模式及产业升级研究[J]科技管理研究,2009(6)
    [40]尤振来,刘应宗。基于动态能力的全球价值链背景下地方集群升级策略研究[J]现代管理科学,2009(8)
    [41]魏丽华。全球价值链视角下我国产业集群升级的必然性分析——以金融危机中的加工制造业集群为例[J]北方论丛,2009(2)
    [42]赵夫增,穆荣平。全球价值链中落后国家的产业集群生命周期研究[J]中国科技论坛,2007(12)
    [43]韩晶。租金、收益与产业升级——对全球价值链下收益分配不均问题的思考[J]财经问题研究,2008(10)
    [44]周晓艳,黄永明。全球价值链下产业升级的微观机理分析——以台湾地区PC产业为例[J]中南财经政法大学学报,2008(2)
    [45]刘芹。产业集群升级研究述评[J]工业经济,2007(8)
    [46]戴勇。外生型集群企业升级的影响因素与策略研究——全球价值链的视角[J]中山大学学报(社会科学版),2009(1)
    [47]茹玉骢。FDI产业集聚的形成与演进[J]浙江学刊,2005(3)
    [48]江小涓。中国外资经济对增长、结构升级和竞争力的贡献[J]中国社会科学,2002(6)
    [49]李恒。基于FDI的产业集群研究[D]华中科技大学博士论文,2006
    [50]董联党。集群视角下的FDI技术溢出效应研究——长三角为例[D]西北大学,2009
    [51]周晔,胡汉辉。地方主导产业的演化规律与产业集群生态特征初探——兼论产业集群与企业集聚的区别[J]中国软科学,2007(7)
    [52]张聪群。论产业集群的本质、特征及其结构[J]学习与探索,2007(4)
    [53]姜谨。FDI技术溢出效应影晌因素研究的理论假设与经验证据[J]外国经济与管理,2007(1)
    [54]刘一鸣。外国直接投资的溢出效应研究[J]财经问题研究,2005(6)
    [55]陈守明。大学在产业集群知识转移中角色的实证研究[J]科学学研究.2007(25)
    [56]林小兰,赵增耀。跨国公司在华独资、控股企业的技术溢出效应分析[J]现代经济探讨,2005(4)
    [57]张明龙。产业集群生命周期取决于技术自主创新[J]经济论坛,2008(5)
    [58]张明龙,官仲章。产业集群突破生命周期拐点的关键[J]开发研究,2008(6)
    [59]何雄浪。劳动分工理论与产业集群形成和发展机理分析[J]科技管理研究,2007(7)
    [60]张涌,陈雪梅。基于制度视角产业集群的形成机理分析[J]暨南学报(哲学社会科学版),2008(2)
    [61]陶良虎,陈得文。产业集群创新动力模型分析[J]江海学刊,2008(2)
    [62]姜凌。产业集群创新动力与机理解析[J]科技管理研究,2009(5)
    [63]陈柳钦。产业集群创新问题探讨[J]甘肃理论学刊,2007(1)
    [64]李享章,陈小京。基于FDI的产业集群形成机制与民营经济的发展[J]统计与决策,2007(23)
    [65]刘锦英,聂鸣。产业集群的创新动力及其形成机制分析[J]经济经纬,2006(3)
    [66]张晔,刘志彪。外资代工型增长模式——以中国苏州为例[J]经济理论与经济管理,2008(10)
    [67]陈享光,王选华。我国西部地区引进FDI技术溢出效应考察:以重庆为例[J]西南大学学报(社会科学版),2009(5)
    [68]万解秋。外资并购新变化及其对江苏产业发展的影响[J]市场周刊(理论研究),2009(12)
    [69]张晖,万解秋。企业自主创新的障碍与路径选择[J]河南金融管理干部学院学报,2009(4)
    [70]马玉宏,万解秋。新金融中介理论的发展及其评述[J]现代经济探讨,2009(5)
    [71]万解秋,赵亚春。从激励机制看增长方式的本质——从技术到制度面的双重考察[J]苏州大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2009(7)
    [72]张晖,万解秋。企业自主创新中的金融支持[J]现代金融,2009(5)
    [73]赵增耀,王喜。独资化趋势下FDI对国有企业的溢出效应分析[J]江海学刊,2007(6)
    [74]付雯雯。FDI溢出效应对中国产业集群的影响——以电子信息产业为例的实证研究[J]中国科技论坛,2009(8)
    [75]梅丽霞,蔡铂,聂明。全球价值链与地方产业集群升级[J]科技进步与对策,2005(4)
    [76]谢汉立。金融发展与外商直接投资的产业结构优化效应[J].中国金融,2011(10)
    [77] United Nations Industrial Organization. Industrial Development Report2002/2003Overview[R],2002
    [78] M.Olson,The Logic of Collective Action,Cambridge:Harvard University Press,1971.
    [79] R.Putnam,Making Democracy Work:Civic Traditions in Modern Italy,Princeton:Princeton University Press,1993,PP.173—174.
    [80] Kaplinsky and Morris(2001),A Handbook for Value Chain Research”,Institute ofDevelopment Studies,University of Sussex and School of DevelopmentStudies,University of Natal,www.ids.ac.uk
    [81] Poter M E. Clusters and the New Economics of Competition [J].Harvard BusinessReview,1998,76(6):77-90.
    [82] Caves R E. Multinational Firms, Competition, and Productivity in Host-CountryMarket[J]Economics.1974,41(162):176-193.
    [83] Kokko A. Technology, Market Characteristics, and Spillovers [J]Journal ofDevelopment Economics.1994,43(2):279-293.
    [84] Chang S J&Xu D. Spillovers and Competition among Foreign and Local Firms inChina [J]Journal of Strategic Management.2008,29(5):495-518.
    [85] Michael E. Porter:Clusters and New Economics of Competition [J], Harvard BusinessReview,1998(11)
    [86] Gereffi,G.,J.Humphrey,and T.Sturgeon.2005.The governance of global valuechains.Review of International Political Economy12(1):78-104
    [87] Yadong Luo, Seung Ho Park Multipart.~r cooperation and performance ininternational equity joint ventures[J]Journal of International Business Studies2004,35:142160.
    [88] GEREFFI, G. Global Production Systems and Third World Development[M]Cambridge University Press.2002
    [89] Schmitz,H. and Korringa, P..Leaning from global buyers[J]Journal of DevelopmentStudies,2000(137):177-205.
    [90] Kaplinsky,R..Globalization and unequaliation:what can be learned from value chainanalysis?[J].Journal of Development Studies,2007,(37):117-146.
    [91] Tichy G,Clusters:less Dispensable and More Risky than Ever, Clusters and RegionalSpecialisation,Published by Pion.Limited,207Brondesbury Park,London NW25JM,1998.
    [92] E.M.Bergman,Industrial Cluster Sustainability at Austria’sAccession Edge:BetterorWorse than Regional Sustainability?Environment and Sustainable Development in theNew Central Europe:Austria and Its Neighbors,2002,September,19-21.
    [93] Humphrey J.and Schmitz H.Governance and Upgrading:Linking Research onIndustrial Districts and Global Value Chains[R]. Brighton:Institute of DevelopmentStudies,2000.
    [94] Jorg Meyer-stamer.Path dependence in regional development: persistence and changesin three industrial clusters in Santa Catarina,Brazil. World development,1998,Vo1.26.No.8, pp.1495-1511.
    [95] Cooke P.Regional Innovation Systems:General Finding and Some New Evidencefrom Biotechnology Clusters,Journal of Technology Transfer,2002,27:133-145.
    [96] Aghion,Philippe,and Howitt,Peter.A Model of Growth Through CreativeDestruction.NBER Working Paper No.3223.Cambridge,MA.1990
    [97] Grossman, Gene M, and Helpman, Elhanan. Comparative Advantage and Long-RunGrowth. American Economic Review,1990(80):796~815
    [98] Larimo, J.(1993). The ownership arrangement decision in foreign directinvestments:An empirical study of Finnish subsidiaries in OECD countries.Journalof Euro marketing,3(1),75—111.
    [99] Li,J.,&Guisinger,S.(1992).The globalization of service multinationals in the triadregions:Japan,Western Europe and North America.Journal of International BusinessStudies23(4),675—696.
    [100]Mac Dougali,G.D.A.(1960),“The Benefits and Costs of Private Investment fromAbroad:A Theoretical Approach”,Economic Record,V01.36,13-35.
    [101]Nash,John.Two-person cooperative games[J].Economatrica,1953,V01.21:128-140.
    [102]Pagano Macro,Roell Ailsa.The choice of stock ownership structure:Agency costsmonitoring and the decision to go public[J].111e Quarterly Journal of Economics,1998,2:187,225.
    [103]Pouder,R.and St.John,C,(1996),“Hot Spots and Blind Spots:GeographicalClusters of Firms and Innovation”,The Academy of Management Review,21(41
    [104]Sabi, M.(1988). An application of the theory of foreign direct investmentmultinational banking in LDCs.Journal of International Business Studies,i9(Fall),433—448.
    [105]Schroath,F-W:,Hu,M.Y.,&Chen,H.(1993).Country of origin effects offoreign investments in the People’S Republic of China.Journal of InternationalBusiness Studies,24(2),277—290.
    [106]sjoholm,F.,(1999).Technology gap,competition and spillovers from direct foreigninvestment:Evidence from establishment data.The Journal of Development Studies36,53-73.
    [107] Takii,S.,(2001).Productivity spillovers and characteristics of foreign multinationalplants in Indonesian manufacturing1990-1995.International Center for the Study ofEast Asian Development.
    [108]Takii,S.,(2005).Productivity spillovers and characteristics of foreign multinationalplants in Indonesian manufacturing1990—1995. Journal of DevelopmentEconomics,2005,v01.76,issue2,pages521.542.
    [109]Vernon,R.(1966).International investment and international trade in the productcycle.Quarterly Journal ofEconomics,80,190—207.
    [110]Williamson O.The Economic institutions of capitalism[M].New York:Free Press,1985.
    [111]Wind,Y.,&Perl mutter,H.v.(1977).On the identification of the frontier issuesof international marketing.Columbia Journal ofWorld Business,12(Winter),131—139.
    [112]Young,S.,Lan,P.,(1997).Technology transfer to China through foreign directinvestment.Regional Studies3l(7),669-679.
    [113]Zhu,G,Lu,D.,(1998).Evidence of spill-over efficiency:Implication on industrialpolicies towards foreign direct investment in China.The Singapore Economic Review43(1),57-73.
    [114]Kognt, B. Designing Global Strategic: Comparative and Competitive Value-addedChains[J]. Sloan Management Review,1985,26(4)
    [115]Porter, M. Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performanec[M]. New York: The Free Press1985.
    [116]Gereffi, International Trade and Industrial Upgrading in the Apparel CommodityChains[J]. Journal of International Economics1999,48
    [117]Gereffi, G., Hnmphrey, J,Sturgeon, T. The Governance of G1obaL Value Chains: AnAnalytic Framework. http://www.ids.ac.nk/globalvalncchains,2003