摘要
快速发展的互联网深层次地改变了社会的基本形态，也带来日益严重的网络侵权问题，严重妨碍了网络经济的发展。
网络开放共享、实时互动等特征，使网络侵权行为呈现出国际性、技术性、隐蔽性、严重破坏性等特点。网络侵权严重侵害了民事主体的合法权益，而传统法律制度却适用困难。对此，首先在大量新型网络权益立法保护缺位问题上，应加强传统法律的调整和对网络权益交叉保护，同时研究出台新法，完善网络基础法律体系立法保护新型网络权益。其次，在网络侵权责任认定问题上，网络侵权责任适用所有的归责原则；三种类型的网络服务提供者是网络侵权的主要侵权主体，不同类型的网络服务商的侵权行为特点不同，其侵权责任的归责原则和责任形态不同。对网络信息的“控制力标准”在确定因特网服务提供者的侵权责任中具有普遍意义，正确认定因特网服务提供者的侵权责任是有效保护网络权益的关键。
著作权网络侵权是最常见、最严重的网络侵权行为，传统著作权法对著作权的保护已越来越力不从心。网络，扩展了传统著作权客体“作品”的内容和表现形式。网络，还改变了著作权权利体系的内容和结构。网络，也带来了网络侵权责任认定上的新问题。对此，应适应网络的需求，全方位加强网络时代著作权的立法保护。首先，强化对计算机软件的著作权保护，取消专门法保护；增加新的著作权保护客体。其次，进一步完善网络著作权权利体系和保护机制，调整著作权精神权利保护模式；在网络著作权权利扩张的趋势下，通过建立网络的“合理使用”和“法定许可”制度，重建著作权保护的利益平衡机制。另外，在立法上对网络内容服务提供商侵权适用严格责任原则，引入“帮助性侵
权”等界定主机服务商的间接侵权责任，正确认定网络服务商的侵权责任。此
外，还要制定合理的侵权损害赔偿标准，完善著作权网络侵权的司法救济制度。
隐私权制度的建立和发展与现代科技技术密切相关，网络的发展再一次冲
生着传统的隐私权制度。网络时代个人信息的数字化和商业利用的发展，侵权
主体的多样化和对信息的高度控制，在认定网络服务商的侵权责任方面的立法
缺位，使隐私权网络侵权问题日益严重。对此，首先应尽快立法确认隐私权的
独立人格权地位，对其进行直接保护。其次，完善相关立法，制定“个人数据
保护法”，进一步明确隐私权侵权的侵权责任。同时，在现阶段还可采取分散保
护和特别保护相结合的隐私权保护模式;实行必要的网络管制，加强对网络的
宏观监控等手段来加强隐私权保护。
With the rapid development of the technology of network and Internet, the basic social status has being changed deeply and infringement in cyberspace is getting more and more serious, which has hampered the progress of network economy.
The opening and sharing Internet made the tort action in cyberspace has some special features, such as international, easy to conceal, technological methods, seriously destruction. Although infringements in cyberspace has trespassed the legal rights of civil subject seriously, the application of traditional laws are very difficult. Therefore, First, we must adjust the traditional law and cross-protect the new network
rights. At the same time, it is necessary to enact some new laws to perfect the basic network law system. Second, all the doctrines of liability fixation are fit to determine the network tort liability, Internet Service Providers are the chief tort-feasors of network torts, they can be divided into three types. Different type of ISP has different character of tort action, different tort liability, fit different doctrines of liability fixation. Control norm of network information has universal meaning to determine the tort liability of ISP , It is the right protection hinge to determine the tort liability of ISP properly.
The most commonly and seriously infringement in cyberspace is copyright tort. Network is, adding some new objects of copyright, changing the system and structure of copyright, also bringing some new problems of determination to the copyright tort liability in. cyberspace. In order to adapt to the demands of Internet we must
strengthen the legal protection of copyright in cyberspace in all orientations. First,
strengthening the legal copyright protection of "computer programs" and
abolishing special law protection, adding new type objects of copyright in
cyberspace. Second, do more to perfect the copyright system and protection
mechanism, adjust the 1 protecting model to personal right of copyright. Third,
reconstruct the benefits balance mechanism of copyright protection in cyberspace by
establishing the "fair use" and the "statutory license" system. Forth, in order to
determine the tort liability of ISP properly, it is important to fit the principle of strict
liability on determining the tort liability of Internet Content Provider and to quote the
"contributory infringement " to determine the indirect tort liability of Internet
Access provider. Fifth, enacting the standard of compensation for damage reasonably
to perfect the judicial remedy system of copyright tort.
The construction and development of the right of privacy relevance to the science and technology, Internet impacts the traditional law system. In the Internet time human personal information digitalized which can also be used to commercial purpose, tort-feasors of right of right of privacy torts are variety whom control the network information powerfully, and the delay of legislation on determining the tort liability of ISP, all these reasons made infringement on the right to privacy in
cyberspace has getting worse. So, at first we must determine the independent personal right status rapidly, and protect it directly. Second, enact "the Personal Data Protection Act" to determine the e tort liability of right of privacy torts. Third, at present, we can adopt both special protection and distract protection model to strengthen the protection to the right of privacy. Forth, we can also apply some necessary control to network and Internet, strengthen network and Internet macroscopic supervise.
引文
1、蒋志培主编：《网络与电子商务法》，法律出版社，2002年版。
2、薛虹：《网络时代的知识产权法》，法律出版社，2000年版。
3、郑成思主编：《知识产权文丛》第一卷，中国政法大学出版社，1999年版。
4、郑成思主编：《知识产权文丛》第二卷，中国政法大学出版社，1999年版。
5、郑成思主编：《知识产权文丛》第三卷，中国政法大学出版社，1999年版。
6、齐爱民 徐亮：《电子商务法原理和实务》武汉大学出版社，2001年版。
7、王利民 杨立新：《侵权行为法》，法律出版社，1996年12月第一版。
8、张新宝：《中国侵权行为法》第二版，中国社会科学出版社，1995年版。
9、王建平：《民法学》，四川大学出版社，1994年版。
10、郭卫华等：《网络中的法律问题及其对策》，法律出版社，2000年版。
11、[美]尼葛洛庞帝：《数字化生存》，胡冰、范海燕译，海南出版社 1997年版。
12、哈里斯(美)：《数字化资产》，常晓波、周海鹏译，中国百科全书出版社，2002年版。