采收成熟度和1-MCP处理对冷藏晚香蕉李果实品质和褐变的影响
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
李子在冷藏期间,随着果实后熟和组织衰老,常常发生不同程度的果肉褐变,这在很大程度上影响着李子的果实品质和商品价值。本研究以晚香蕉李为试验材料,研究了采收成熟度和不同浓度1-MCP(1-甲基环丙烯)处理对晚香蕉李贮藏品质和果肉褐变的影响,探讨了适于冷藏的采收成熟度和冷藏条件下1-MCP的适宜处理浓度,为晚香蕉李子的贮藏保鲜提供了理论依据。
     试验结果表明:
     1.中成熟度(果实黄白色面积占2/3,香气明显,手感较软)果实品质远高于低成熟度果实,与成熟果实接近,果实呼吸强度、丙二醛含量和PPO酶活性较低,贮藏后期仍能维持较低膜透性,褐变程度比另外两种成熟度都低,为最适宜冷藏的采收成熟度;
     2.冷藏过程中,1-MCP处理并没有维持较高的果实硬度,反而使果实硬度有所下降,对总酸含量的影响也没有明显的规律性。1-MCP处理维持了较高的总糖含量,明显抑制了果实的呼吸速率、膜透性的改变、MDA(丙二醛)含量的升高、PPO活性、总酚含量的升高和褐变,并延迟了呼吸高峰的到来。
     3.冷藏条件下1-MCP处理的最佳浓度为500nL/L。该处理维持了较低的膜透性、MDA含量、PPO活性和总酚含量,其果实褐变程度也较低。
     4.1-MCP处理明显抑制了贮藏30天后货架期内晚香蕉李果实的呼吸作用、膜透性的改变、MDA的生成、总酚含量的生成和腐烂褐变,并能维持较高的总糖、可溶性固形物含量和总酸含量,而对果实硬度和PPO活性的抑制效果并不明显。
     5.对贮藏60天后货架期晚香蕉李果实,1-MCP处理仍能抑制其呼吸作用、膜透性的改变、MDA的生成、PPO活性和腐烂褐变,并能维持较高的可溶性固形物含量和总酸含量,而总酚含量、果实硬度则和对照果实没有明显的区别。
During the period of refrigeration, with fruit ripening and tissue senescence, the plum often occured flesh browning in varying degrees. Plum's quality and commercial value was largely affected when those happens. In this paper, late-maturing banana-plum was used as the experimental materials. That the different maturity and 1-MCP treatment what had influence on the banana-plum quality and browning was studied, the late-banana plum flesh's browning under refrigeration and preservation techniques discussed. The results indicated that:
     1. Under refrigeration the best maturity of fruit was medium maturity.
     Mature fruit contain a higher total sugar, Vc and soluble solids (SSC) content, while the fruit's membrane permeability, MDA content and hardness was lower, which showed lower fruit quality. Fruit with yellow-white area accounted for 2/3, clear aroma and soft was the medium mature fruit.. The total sugar, Vc and SSC content of medium mature fruit were higher than those of low maturity fruit, closed to those of ripe fruit. Respiration rate, MDA content, and PPO activity of the medium mature fruit was lower, which was able to maintain low cell membrane permeability during the late storage period. So the medium maturity was the most appropriate maturity for refrigeration.
     2. During the period of refrigeration,1-MCP treatment significantly inhibited the plum respiration, membrane permeability, total phenols content, the increase of MDA and the browning of fruit. And 1-MCP treatment remained late-banana plum a higher total sugar and soluble solids content. Whereas there was no clear law that 1-MCP treatment had influence upon fruit firmness, total acid and PPO activity.
     3. The optimum concentration of 1-MCP treatment was 500nL/L, while this treatment can maintain lower cell membrane permeability and obviously inhibited the late-banana plum's PPO activity, the increase of MDA and flesh browning.
     4. During the shelf life after 30days storage,1-MCP treatment clearly inhibited the respiration of late-banana plum flesh, changes of membrane permeability, MDA formation, the increase of total phenols, decay and browning. And 1-MCP treatment maintained the higher sugar content, SSC content and total acid content, while there was no clear rules to fruit firmness and PPO activity.
     5. During the shelf life after 60days storaged banana-plum flesh,1-MCP treatment aslo inhibited the respiration, changes of membrane permeability, MDA formation, PPO activity, decay and browning. And 1-MCP treatment maintained the higher SSC content and total acid content, whereas the total phenols content and fruit firmness were not significantly different as that of comparison group.
引文
1.曹建康,姜微波,赵玉梅.2007.果蔬采后生理生化实验指导[M].北京:中国轻工业出版社
    2.曹珂,等.2007.间歇升温处理对李子贮藏效果的影响.江苏农业科学[J],4(7):216-218
    3.常军,张平.2003.1-MCP对青州蜜桃贮藏生理的影响.北方果树[J],(6):4-6
    4.陈建勋,王晓峰.2002.植物生理学实验指导[M].广州:华南理工大学出版社,125-126
    5.陈昆松,于梁.1991.鸭梨果实气调贮藏过程中CO2伤害机理初探.中国农业科学[J],24(5):83-88
    6.陈昆松.1991.鸭梨气调贮藏的研究.园艺学报[J],18(2):131-137
    7.池致念,柯家耀,王泽生.1999.双抱蘑菇褐变的酶学机理研究.中国食用菌[J],18(6):17-18
    8.陈贻竹,王以柔.1989.荔枝果实过氧化物酶的研究.中国科学院华南植物研究所集刊[J],(5):47-52
    9.都凤华,于伟.1993.间歇加温对减少李子冷藏中低温伤害的作用.吉林农业大学学报[J],15(4):91-93
    10.都凤华,张华云.1994.李子冷藏中间歇加温处理对果实低温伤害、呼吸及乙烯的影响.吉林农业科学[J],2:61-65
    11.杜刚,杨海英,左云平.2007.李子和樱桃番茄的涂膜保鲜研究.化学与生物工程[J],24(3):47-48
    12.杜维东,等.1992.肥城桃不同成熟度对其贮后品质和内部褐变的影响初报.中国果品研究[J],2(4):11-13
    13.段玉权.2004.1-MCP处理对冷藏桃果肉细胞超微结构的影响.中国农业科学[J],37(12):2039-2042
    14.樊秀彩,张继.2001.1-甲基环丙烯对采后猕猴桃果实生理效应的影响.园艺学报[J],28(5):399-402
    15.冯双庆,赵玉梅.1998.果蔬保鲜技术及常规测试方法[M].北京:化学工业出版社,53-54
    16.高海生.2000.杏果李子产地的贮藏保鲜.贮藏加工[J],(5):28-29
    17.关军锋.1994.采后鸭梨果肉和果心中氧化酶活与过氧化物含量的变化.植物生理学通讯[J],30(2):91-93
    18.韩海彪,等.2008.采收成熟度对灵武长枣贮藏品质的影响.食品工业科技[J],29(3):265-270)
    19.李富军,等.2004.1-MCP对肥城桃果实采后衰老的影响.果树学报[J],21(3):272-274.
    20.李富军,张新华.2004.果蔬采后生理与衰老控制[M].北京:中国环境科学出版社,142-143
    21.李敏,等.2004.1-MCP对香蕉采后生理的影响(综述).亚热带植物科学[J],33(3):69-72
    22.李向东,王小云,张高英.2001.花生叶片衰老过程中某些酶活性的变化.植物生理学报[J],27:353-358
    23.李锡香.1994.新鲜果蔬的品质及分析法[M].北京:中国农业出版社208-209
    24.李滢冰,等.2000.李子涂膜保鲜研究.食品与发酵工业[J],26(4)89-91
    25.李妍,等.2006.食品工业科技[J],2006,27(5):170-176)
    26.李正国.2000.温度、丙烯和1-MCP对西洋梨果实乙烯合成和乙烯受体ETR1同源基因表达的影响.园艺学报[J],27(5):313-316
    27.李智体,彭晓东.1989.李、杏果实适宜采收成熟度初探.北方园艺[J],(10):34-35
    28.刘红霞,等.2003.1-甲基环丙烯在果蔬采后保鲜中的作用.北方园艺[J],(3):74-75
    29.鲁周民,等.2003.采收成熟度对板栗品质及贮藏性的影响.食品科学[J],24(7):153-155
    30.陆国权,施志仁.1998.甘薯酶促褐变安全调控研究.浙江农业学报[J],10(1):29-31
    31.潘雪峰,杨明非.2005.李子挥发物质的分析.东北林业大学学报[J],33(3):113-114
    32.乔勇进.2003.热处理对黄瓜贮藏冷害及生理生化的影响.中国农业大学学报[J],8(1):71-74
    33.邵军辉.2006.提高日光温室李子产量和品质的关键技术措施.山西果树[J],6:19-20
    34.沈成果.2001.植物衰老生理与分子生物学[M].北京:中国农业出版社,213-214
    35.史辉,邓伯勋.2005.李贮藏保鲜技术与褐变机理研究.
    36孙芳娟,等.2007.采收成熟度对油桃贮藏品质的影响.北植物学报[J],27(1):183-187
    37.孙蕾,等.2006.鲜枣不同成熟度带叶贮藏试验.食品科学[J],27(10):561-563
    38.孙蕾,等.2002.果实褐变及其机理研究.经济林研究[J],20(2):92-94
    39.孙希生,等.2001.1-MCP对砀山酥梨保鲜效果的影响.保鲜与加工[J],(6):14-17
    40.孙希生,等.2003a.1-MCP对番茄采后生理效应的影响.中国农业科学[J],36(11):1337-1342
    41孙希生,等.2003b.1-MCP对苹果采后生理的影响.果树学报[J],20(1):12-17
    42.田世平,徐勇,姜爱丽.2001.冬雪蜜桃在气调冷藏期间品质及相关酶活性的变化.中国农业科学[J],34(6):656-661
    43.田梅生,盛其潮,李钮.1987.低温贮藏对鸭梨乙烯释放、膜透性及多酚氧化酶的影响.植物学报[J],29(6):614-619
    44.王爱国,等.1986.丙二醛作为植物脂质过氧化指标的探讨.植物生理学通讯[J],(2):55-56
    45.王俊宁,等.2002.1-MCP处理对油桃果实硬度、呼吸及乙烯合成的影响.西北植物学报[J],22(5):1171-1175
    46.王文辉,等.2002.1-MCP对软肉梨采后生理的影响.园艺学进展(第五辑).广东:广州出版社,783-790
    47.王文辉,等.2003.黄金和丰水梨贮藏保鲜研究初报.中国果树[J],(6):12-14
    48.王文辉,等.2004.1-MCP对梨采后某些生理生化指标的影响.植物生理学通讯[J],40(2):175-177
    49.辛力,鲁曼森.1993.李果的贮藏与加工.落叶果树[J],2(3):34-35
    50.徐荣江,林家桦.1981.鸭梨不同采期对采后生理生化变化和贮藏效果的影响.园艺学报[J],8(1):19-25
    51.杨娟侠,鲁墨森.2008.1-MCP对金太阳杏采后生理和保鲜效果的影响.北方园艺.(1):235-237
    52.杨洋,曾庆孝,阮征.2002.壳聚糖及其在果蔬保鲜中的应用研究进展.中国南方果树[J],31(5):71-72
    53.杨增军,冯双庆.1995.采后浸钙对雪花梨果肉褐变的影响.园艺学报[J],22(3):225-229
    54.吴耕西,周宏伟,汪建民.1992.鹏梨酶促褐变的生化机制及底物鉴定.园艺学报[J],19(3):198-202
    55.颜志梅,等.2004.1-MCP处理对梨常温贮藏效果的影响.江苏农业学报[J],20(3):189-193
    56.张广燕,等.2005.减压对安哥诺李贮藏生理生化变化的影响[J].食品科学,26(6):257-259
    57.张华云,王善广,赵瑛.1990.梨果肉褐变与某些生化特性的关系.莱阳农学院学报[J],9(1):139-142
    58.张华云,王善广.1991.梨果实贮藏性与果实组织结构关系的研究.莱阳农学院学报[J],8(4):276-279
    59.张志良.1994.植物生理学实验指导[M].北京:高等教育出版社,154-155
    60.张维.1993.果蔬采后生理学[M].北京:中国农业出版社,137-138
    60.张建英,陈运娣.2003.李子贮藏保鲜综合技术[J].河北林业科技,2(1):21-22
    62.张明晶,等.2002.1-甲基环丙烯对香蕉食用品质的影响.食品科学[J],23(2):126-128
    63.张银志,等.2003.低温胁迫和变温处理对李子生理特性的影响[J].食品科学,24(2):134-137
    64.张有林,张润光.2007.石榴贮藏果皮褐变机理研究.中国农业科学[J],40(3):573-581
    65.赵江涛,等.2006.1-MCP在园艺作物贮藏保鲜上的应用.江苏农业科学[J],(2):13-14
    66.周亚凤,马岩松,张平.1999.南果梨酶促褐变的生化机制.北方果树[J],(1):8-10
    67.周会玲.2001.气调贮藏发展的研究.北方园艺[J],(5):31-34
    68周坚,万楚药,沈汪洋.2005.甜柿多酚氧化酶特性的研究及褐变控制.食品科学[J],26(1):60-63
    69. Blankenship SM, Sisler EC.1989.2,5-Norbornadiene retards apple softening. HortScience,24:313-314
    70. Blankenship SM, Sisler EC.1993. Response of apples to diazocyclopentadiene inhibition of ethylene binding. Postharvest Biol Technology[J],3:95-101
    71.Lyons J M. Chilling injury in plants.1973. Ann Rev Plant Physiol[J],24:445-446
    72.Sisler EC,Dupille E,Serek M.1996. Effect of 1-methylcyclopropene and Methylenecyclopropane on ethylene binding and ethylene action on cut carnations. Plant Growth Regul,18:79-286
    73.Serek M,Sisler EC,Reid MS.1994. Novel gaseous inhibitor of ehtylene binding prevents ethylene effects in potted flowering plant. JAmer Soc Hort Sc[J],119:1230-1233