摘要
国防科技工业作为国家的战略性产业,在国防建设和国民经济发展中具有影响全局的重要作用。通过国防科技工业的产学研合作,使高新技术转化为具有较高经济效益的现实生产力,促进高新技术的商品化、产业化和国际化对我国国防工业技术创新体系的建立具有深远的意义。
论文先对产学研合作的基本理论及其相关理论做了研究和探索,对现有的研究成果进行了评述,并系统地研究了我国国防科技工业的特点及其对国防科技工业产学研合作发展的影响,指出了通过实施国防科技工业产学研合作对于利用、转化和应用国防科技军工技术,对于发展我国国民经济的必要性和重要性。在此基础上,通过对影响我国国防科技工业产学研合作的内外部因素的分析,构建了国防科技工业产学研合作动力机制模型;利用最大熵改进的Shapley算法定量地分析了国防科技工业产学研合作的收益分配模型;对于国防科技工业产学研合作评价问题,则在构建评价指标体系的基础上,利用模糊综合评价方法给出了评价我国国防科技工业产学研合作的评价模型。文章从国防科技工业产学研合作实体组织的角度将目前我国国防科技工业产学研合作模式分为六类,并从各产学研合作分类模式的实质、特征、可行性条件和典型的合作方式等四个角度对其进行了比较分析,建立了我国国防科技工业产学研合作模式的选择标准,提高了国防科技工业产学研合作实践的可操作性。论文的最后从国防科技工业产学研合作技术创新的合作主体、合作机制的建立、建立多元投资融资体系和中介机构合作服务体系等角度出发,提出了对策和建议。
The science technology and industry of national defense is the strategy industry which display a very important effect on the national defense construction and national economy. Through the Industry University and Research Institute’s cooperation of the science technology and industry of national defense, we can transfer the high technology to the high economic productivity. The commercialization industrialization and internationalization of high-technology have a deep effect on the technology creation system on national defense industry.
This article first researches the basic and relative theories of cooperation of industry university and research institution, with the incompletion of the researches up to now was listed. Then on the basis of analyzing the features of the science technology and industry of national defense, we can see the importance of the Industry University and Research Institute’s cooperation, and through analyzing the internal and external factors, it gives out the motivity system model; with the method of Shapley value improved by Entropy, the income distribution model. Related to the evaluation of cooperation, this article list the evaluation index system and using the fuzzy general evaluation method to evaluate the cooperation of national defense. In order to make it more practical the six cooperation models was given and compared from four perspectives including substance features conditions and typical cooperation models. Established the selection standard of cooperation model respectively for each enterprise university and the research institutions. At the last, the effective policies and suggestions was given form the perspectives of establishing the cooperation system the mutil-investment system and improving the services of agency institutions.
引文
1刘茂长.美国国防科技工业转型及对我国国防工业改革的启示.军民两用技术与产品. 2005, (6): 3~5
2何奇松.冷战后美国国防工业的重组.美国研究. 2005, (4): 114~132
3崔小宁,韩天兵.冷战结束以来美国国防工业军民一体化发展.国防科技工业. 2001, (8): 56~57
4何奇松.新军事变革下的美国国防科技工业调整及其启示.太平洋学报. 2005, (4): 73~82
5 Rothwell R. Successful industrial innovation-critical factors for the 1990. R&D Management 1992, (3): 221~239
6 L. V. Azaroff, R. Rothwell, K. Boyle. The linkage between relationship intensity and tangible outcomes in industry–university collaborative ventures. Journal of High Technology Management Research. 2000, (1): 255~273
7 J. P. Grander. Internationalization of corporate R&D: a study of Japanese and Swedish corporations. 1999, (3): 275~302
8 Geisler, Rubenstein. The dynamics of innovation: form National Systems and Mode 2 to a Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations. Research Policy. 2000, (29): 109~123
9 Turpin. T. S. Garrett Firm size and technology centrality in industry–university interactions Research Policy. 2002, (9): 1163~1180
10 F. Bidault, W. A. Fisher. A new program in cooperative research between academia and industry in Korea, involving Centers of Excellence. Technovation. 1995, (4): 241~257
11 C Freeman. Technology and Economic Performance. Lessons from Japan. Pinter Publish, 1987:102~132
12 Edwin Mansfield. Success breeds success: The linkage between relationship intensity and tangible outcomes in industry–university collaborative ventures Journal of High Technology Management Research. 2000, (11):255~273
13 Murray Weidenbaum. The U.S. Defense Industry after the Cold War. U.S. Defense Industry. 1997: 591~601
14 Seung Jun Kwak, Seung Hoom Yoo, Jeong In Chang. The role of the maritime industry in the Korean national economy: an input-output analysis. 2005, (29): 421~453
15 S.Myers, D.G.Marpuis. Technology pricing from principles to strategy. New York: St. Martin's Press, 1989: 23~42
16 Atlan. The classification of industry–university collaborative ventures. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management. 2003, (9): 212~219
17毕克新.可持续发展的产学研联合的机制.科学学研究. 1997,(12): 51
18王毅,吴贵生.产学研合作中粘滞知识的成因与转移机制研究.科研管理. 2001, (6): 33~35
19赵兰香.产学研合作的机制分析.科技进步与对策. 1995, (4): 45
20祝东伟.国外产学研合作典型模式的研究与启示.我国科技产业. 2006, (12):32
21薛金梅,周英超.我国产学研合作及相关模式研究.山东医科大学学报. 2000, (2): 83~87
22李廉水.产学研合作创新的组织方式.科研管理. 1998, (1): 31~33
23赵兰香,苏敬勤.产学研合作创新的交易成本及内外部化条件.科研管理. 1999, (5): 68
24李廉水.论完善南京科技创新体系的依据及思路.科技创新. 2001, (1): 9~12
25赵兰香,吴伟.产学研合作的机制分析.科技进步与对策. 1995, (4): 45~46
26李焱焱,叶冰,杜鹃,肖引,桑建平.产学研合作模式分类及其选择思路.科技进步与对策, 2004, (10): 98~99
27金佩华,楼程富.高校产学研合作教育模式初探.我国高教研究. 2001, (1):31~33
28周静珍,万玉刚,高静.我国产学研合作创新的模式研究.科技进步与对策. 2005, (3): 70~72
29 Bidault F. Technology pricing from principles to strategy. New York: St. Martin's Press, 1989:43~75
30 Santoro, Michael D, Gopalakrishnan, Shanthi. The institutionalization of knowledge transfer activities within industry–university collaborative ventures Journal of Engineering and Technology Management. 2000, (9): 299~319
31罗利,鲁若愚.产学研合作对策模型研究.管理工程学报. 2000, (2): 1~4
32张米尔,武春友.技术入股型产学研合作创新的道德风险分析.研究与发展管理. 2001, (2): 29~32
33刘志远.产学研合作过程中交易障碍的实证分析.科研管理. 2000, (3): 13~36
34唐燕儿.产学合作教育对培养应用型人才作用研究.清华大学. 2001, (5): 32~45
35李昆.关于产学研合作的运行模式及环境研究.河海大学. 2000, (6):35~62
36吴坚.产学合作的理论与实践的应用研究.浙江大学. 2002, (5):34~45
37刘元芳.产学研合作模式的研究及优化对策.大连理工大学. 2000, (3): 13~27
38吴树山,孔繁河,潘苏.我国产学研合作模式与机制及其创新.科技进步与管理. 2000,(7): 94~96
39傅家骥.我国技术创新理论研究.政策与管理. 2001, (12): 42
40连燕华,马晓光.我国产学研合作发展态势评价.我国软科学. 2001, (1): 54~59
41 Massay, Lorace L. Udoka, Silvanus J.; Ram, Bala .Industry-University Partnerships: A Model for Engineering Education in the 21st Century Computers and Industrial Engineering. 1995, (9): 77~81
42 Magnus Klofsten, Dylan Jones-Evans. Stimulation of Technology-based small firms—a case study of university-industry cooperation. Technovation. 1996, (4):187~193
43佟晶石.产学研合作创新体系与自主知识产权.我国软科学. 2003, (1): 113~116
44丁厚德.我国科技运行论.第一版.清华大学出版社. 2001, (11): 12~43
45李仲篪,刘立新.国防科技成果转化和先进的管理模式.我国国防科技信息. 1997, (4):32~33
46 John Adeoti, Adetola Adeoti. Biotechnology R&D partnership for industrial innovation in Nigeria. Technovation. 2005, (25): 349~365
47赵阳辉.我国国防科技创新系统研究.自然辩证法研究. 1999, (10):24
48黄忠.军转民在技术创新体系中的功能研究.经济体制改革. 2002,(4): 30~34
49石定寰.国家创新体系建设的政策意义.我国科技论坛. 1999, (3): 6-11
50黄鲁成.宏观区域创新体系的理论模式研究.我国软科学. 2002, (1): 95-98
51 Hirokazu, Nishitani. Tsuguo Kawamura, Go Suzuki. University-industry cooperative study on national defense plant operations. Computers and Chemical Engineering. 2000, (24): 557~567
52连海龙.国防科技工业战略模式分析与选择.国防技术基础. 2006, (2): 25~28
53 Daniel Vekstein. Defense conversion, technology policy and R&D networks in the innovation system of Israel. Technovation. 1999, (19): 615-629
54王佩伟,李帆.当代美国产学研合作的发展趋势及其启示.科技进步与对策. 2000, (7): 113~115
55 Takayuki Hayashi. Effect of R&D programs on the formation of university-industry-government networks: comparative analysis of Japanese R&D programs. Research Policy. 2003, (32): 1421~1442
56 Keld Laursen, Ammon Salter. Searching high and low: what types of firms use universities as a source of innovation. Research Policy. 2004, (33): 1201~1215
57王笑君,朱强.论产学研联合技术创新风险承担的合理性.软科学. 2001, (4): 56~58
58杜人淮.国防工业运行中的市场机制功能及其影响因素.军事经济学院学报. 2006, (1): 14~17
59顾海.我国产学研实践中制约因素分析及对策.我国科技产业. 2001, (4): 20~23
60杨栩.我国产学研发展及对策.哈尔滨工程大学. 2002, (1): 70~75
61王英俊,丁堃.“官产学研”型虚拟研发组织产生的动因分析.科技管理研究. 2005, (2): 155~158