改良措施对天然草原植被及土壤的影响
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
本研究以内蒙古锡林郭勒草原南部太仆寺旗退化天然草地为研究对象,于2007-2008年在中国农业科学院草原研究所太仆寺旗试验基地采用不同措施进行改良退化天然草地的研究。在土壤和植被基本一致的退化天然草地上,采用划破草皮(H)、划破草皮+灌溉(H+G)、施用尿素+灌溉(N1:25 kg/hm~2、N2:50 kg/hm~2、N3:75 kg/hm~2、N4:100 kg/hm~2)、施用尿素(S:75 kg/hm~2)等措施对退化天然草地进行处理,以未做任何处理的天然草地作为对照。从植物个体、种群、群落、土壤的理化性质等方面研究各改良措施对退化天然草地的影响效果,探讨不同改良措施之间的差异,并提出适宜该区域的最佳改良措施,为退化草地改良提供理论依据。结果表明:
     1.对照和各处理群落内部植物的生长均呈单峰型变化,株高、盖度、密度和地上生物量等指标均在8月中旬左右达到最大值,但由于2008年雨量丰沛,植物生长期延长,羊草(Leymus chinensis T. )、米氏冰草(Agropyron cristatum L.)等部分植物的生长在9月份达到最大值。
     2.划破草皮可以增加土壤通气透水性,增强土壤保水力;灌溉增加了土壤含水量;施肥有效补充了土壤养分的不足,所以,各处理措施均可有效促进退化天然草地植物的生长。植被高度、盖度、种群密度与对照相比均有显著提高;叶面积指数增大,群落地上、地下生物量均有增加。
     3.各处理措施均可以有效促进群落内各种植物的生长,其中以羊草、米氏冰草、星毛委陵菜(Pottentilla acaulis L. )和糙苏(Phlomis tuberosa L.)四个物种种群对各处理措施的响应最为敏感,在群落中的组分及重要值变化相对较大。但不同处理措施对各物种种群的影响效果也不同。羊草是原草地植被的建群种,星毛委陵菜是现草地植被的优势种,本文主要以这两个植物种群及群落和土壤养分的变化作为主要指标,米氏冰草和糙苏种群的变化作为辅助指标来评价各种改良措施的效果。
     4.各处理措施相比,两年均以N2处理对羊草种群增长的促进效果最为显著。与对照相比,羊草种群高度两年分别增加了64.42%和45.14%;种群密度与分盖度也均有提高,分盖度最高可达40%,与对照相比提高了一倍;种群地上生物量两年分别提高了538.98%和249.53%;在群落中产量百分比最高,可达41%左右;在群落中的重要值也由最初对照的0.21增加到了0.45。当施肥量大于50kg/hm2时个体数量特征变化不再明显。
     5.各处理措施相比,两年均以N4处理对星毛委陵菜的种群变化影响最为显著。与对照相比,种群高度分别提高了32.7%和26.9%,密度和盖度也都有显著增加;显著提高了种群地上生物量,与对照相比两年分别增加了123.28%和12.37%。种群在群落中的重要值也有相应变化,2007年重要值与对照相比提高了0.4;2008年所有处理星毛委陵菜种群的重要值均低于对照,但N4处理相对降低较少。综合比较两年的处理效果发现,除H+G和N2处理外其它处理星毛委陵菜种群在群落中的重要值均在当年或次年高于羊草在群落中的重要值。
     6.各处理措施均可有效促进群落内各种植物的生长,可以显著增加群落的高度、密度,盖度和群落的地上生物量。与其他处理措施相比,施肥可以显著增加群落的密度、盖度和地上生物量,其中以N2和N3处理效果最好,群落地上生物量在2007年8月与对照相比分别增加了163.68%(N2)和169.71%(N3),2008年9月与对照相比分别增加了53.04%(N2)和51.57%(N3)。群落的多样性指数、均匀度指数、叶面积指数和根冠比等由于受多种因素的共同影响,年际变化较大,所以未把其当做衡量改良措施的直接指标。
     7.各处理措施相比,以N2处理对米氏冰草种群高度、密度、分盖度和地上生物量以及在群落中的重要值的增加效果最为显著,以N3处理对糙苏种群各项指标的增加效果最为显著。
     8. N2处理下土壤的养分含量均有相应的提高。土壤的全氮含量0-10cm与对照相比提高了2.86%;全磷含量各土层与对照相比分别提高了2.85%、13.76%和12.75%;10-20cm和20-30cm土层的碱解氮含量均显著高于对照,与对照相比分别提高了7.03%和26.86%;土壤的速效磷含量和有机质含量各土层也都有提高,与对照相比速效磷含量分别提高了21.56%、2.94%和22.92%;有机质含量分别提高了3.78%、12.91%和21.72%。
     9.综合各处理措施对四个物种种群、群落及土壤养分的影响,以N2处理对羊草种群增长、群落地上生物量和土壤养分的的增加效果最为明显,而且羊草的重要值两年均高于星毛委陵菜,取代星毛委陵菜成为群落中的主要物种,在群落中占有主导地位;同时也增加了优良饲用牧草冰草在群落中的组分,所以兼顾改良效果和草地的利用价值,几种措施相比,施肥50kg/hm2+灌溉是该区域最佳的改良措施。
     10.比较H和H+G,S和N3处理的效果可以发现,同一措施实行早春灌溉可有效促进群落内植物种群的增长,比后期增加降雨更为有效。
     11.两年间群落内物种洽草、糙苏、唐松草和矮韭等植物的开花期出现明显的差异。
     12.各改良处理影响了群落地上、地下生物量的分配,根冠比值均低于对照。两年间地上、地下生物量和根冠比值与生长季降雨量的关系均不明显;部分处理的地上生物量与温度存在一定关系,但总体表明气候因素对各处理效果并未起到决定性作用。
The research was carried out at the country of Taipusi, south of Xilingol Grassland of Inner Mongolia, for two years from 2007 to 2008. The objective of the experiment is to research the effect of different improved measures on the degraded grassland. There were four measures adopted: turf scarifying(H), turf scarifying and irrigation(H+G), fertilizer(N1:25kg/hm~2, N2:50 kg/hm~2, N3:75 kg/hm~2, N4:100 kg/hm~2 urea per year) and irrigation, fertilizer(S:75 kg/hm~2 urea per year) and none as control to research the effect and mechanism of these measures from the characteristic of individual, populations, community and soil, and according to these to choose a more suitable measure of the region and provide theory foundation. The results indicated:
     1. The height、coverage、density、and biomass of all species in community got the maximum at the middle of August. Some species such as Leymus chinensis and Agropyron crastatum were got the maximum at the middle of September because of the abundant rainfall in 2008 year.
     2. The treatment of turf scarifying can improve the soil condition of air and water content. The treatment of irrigation can increase the water content of the soil and the treatment of fertilization can improve the deficiency of soil nutrient. So all the treatments could be effectively improved the recovery of the degraded grassland. The height, coverage, density and biomass of the community were significantly improved in contrast to the control and the leaf indexes were increased.
     3. The different measures could be effectively improved the growth of all plants. And the species of Leymus chinensis, Agropyron crastatum, Pottentilla acaulis and Phlomis tuberose were more sensitive to the measures. The percentage in community and the important value of those were changed relatively obviously by different measures. The species of Leymus chinensis and Pottentilla acaulis are seperately the constrative and the dominant species in the community and according to the changes of both species and community and the nutrient of siol as indexes to evaluate the effects of the treatments.
     4. The measures of 50kg/hm2 urea could be the best to the growth of Leymus chinensis in two years.The height increased 64.42% and 45.14% separately in 2007 and 2008 years to the control. And the coverage also increased 40%, double to the control. The biomass of community increased 538.98% and 249.53% separately in two years and the important values increased from 0.21 to 0.45.
     5. The measures of 100kg/hm2 urea could be the most significant to the growth of Pottentilla acaulis in two years. The height increased 32.7% and 26.9% to the control in two years. The density and coverage also increased. The biomass of community increased 123.28% and 12.37% separately in two years and the important value increased 0.4 to the control in 2007 year. The important values of Leymus chinensis were lower than Pottentilla acaulis except in H+G and N2 treatment of two years.
     6. All measures could improved the plant growth in the community, and the height、density、coverage and the above ground biomass of the community were significantly promoted. N2 and N3 treatments were the most effective in contrast to others. The aboveground biomass increased 163.68% and 169.71% in August of 2007 year separately and 53.04% and 51.57% in September in 2008 year. The richness (S and Margalef index)、diversity index (Simpon index and Shannon-Weaver index)、LAI index and the ratio root: shoot were changed a lot in two years relating to many factors, so they were not contained in the indexes of evaluate the effects of treatments.
     7. In contrast to all measures, N2 treatment was the most significant way to improve the height、density、coverage、aboveground biomass and the important value of the Agropyron crastatum species and the same of Phlomis tuberose species by N3 treatment.
     8. The soil nutrient of N2 treatment was all enhanced. The total nitrogen content of 0-10 cm soil depth was increased 2.86% to the control. The total phosphorus content were increased 2.85%、13.76% and 12.75% separately in 0-10cm, 10-20cm, 20-30cm soil depth. The available nitrogen content were higher in 10-20cm and 20-30 cm soil depth to the control, increased 7.03% and 26.86% separately. The available phosphorus content increased 21.56%, 2.94% and 22.92% and organic matters content were increased 3.78%, 12.91% and 21.72% in every soil depth separately.
     9. In contrast of the effects of changes of fours species, community and soil nutrient, N2 treatment was the most significant effective. And the important values of Leymus chinensis were higher than Pottentilla acaulis in two years and became the dominant species in the community. The percentage of Agropyron crastatum in community was also increased. So in considering of the treatments effects and the value in use of the grassland, 50kg/hm2 urea and irrigation was the most effective way in the region.
     9. The plant growth coule be better in the early spring than increasing rainfall later by the contrast of H and H+G, S and N3 treatments.
     10. The period of flowering of species such as Koeleria cristata, Phlomis tuberose, Thalictum petaloideum and Allium anisopodium were changed in two years.
     11. The distribution of aboveground biomass and belowground biomass were changed in different treatments and the ratio root: shoot were lower than the control. There were no obvious relationships of the aboveground biomass, belowground biomass and the ratio root: shoot to the rainfall in growing seasons, but had some correlation to the last month average temperature. And the climate factors did not have the determine function to the effects of treatment.
引文
1.阿德力·麦地等.天山南坡高寒退化草地人工治理技术的初步研究[J].中国草地,2003,25 (3):77-79.
    2.安渊,王育青,陈敏,孙启忠,闫志坚,扬志伟.沙地草场补播技术及其生态效益研究[J].草地学报,1997,5 (1):33-41.
    3.巴雷,王德利.松嫩草原羊草与其主要伴生种竞争与共存研究[J].草地学报,2006,14 (1)::95-96.
    4.宝音陶格涛,王静.退化羊草草原在浅耕翻处理后植物多样性动态研究[J].中国沙漠,2006,26 (2):232-237.
    5.宝音陶格涛,陈敏.退化草原封育改良过程中植物种的多样性变化的研究[J].内蒙古大学学报(自然科学版),1997,28 (1):87-91.
    6.宝音陶格涛,陈敏,柳景辉.退化羊草草原封育恢复群落演替动态的研究[J].内蒙古大学学报,1996,27 (1):105-107.
    7.曹晔,杨玉东.论中国草地资源的现状、原因与持续利用对策[J].草业科学,1999,16 (4):1-6.
    8.程积民,贾恒义,彭祥林.施肥草地群落生物量结构的研究[J].草业学报,1997,(6):22-27.
    9.慈龙骏,刘玉平.人口增长对荒漠化的驱动作用[J].干旱区资源与环境,2000,14 (1):28~33.
    10.陈自胜,赵明清.退化羊草草场松土与施肥的研究.见:中国草地科学研究与反战战略-中国草原学会第三届代表大会暨第五次全国学术会议论文选编.1990,227-229.
    11.陈佐忠.我国天然草地生态系统的退化及其调控.中国土地退化防治研究.北京,中国科技出版社.1990
    12.陈佐忠.略论草地生态研究面临的几个热点[J].草业科学,1994,11 (1):42-45.
    13.陈佐忠,汪诗平.中国典型草原生态系统.北京,科学出版社.2000.
    14.陈敏,宝音陶格涛.典型草原地区退化草原的改良及提高生产力的途径的研究[J].植物生态学与地植物学学报,1989,13 (4):379-387.
    15.陈敏,宝音陶格涛.半干旱草原区退化草地改良的试验研究[J].草业科学,1997,14 (6):27-29.
    16.陈裕祥,钟华平,杰布,拉巴.优质牧草引种试验研究初报[J].西藏科技,1999, (4):58-67.
    17.陈亚明.退化嵩草型高山草地补播豆科牧草的研究[J].草业学报,1999,8 (2):71-75.
    18.何婕平,康师安.主成分分析在研究草原土壤养分评价中的应用[J].内蒙古林学院学报,1994,16 (2):52-57.
    19.何锦林,谭红.酸性土壤施石灰对白三叶草养分影响的研究[J].中国草地,1995,(3):34-37.
    20.车敦仁.高寒禾草施氮效应浅析[J].青海畜牧兽医杂志,1994,24 (5):1-6.
    21.车敦仁,梅贤春.高寒地区施氮量对糙毛鹅观草产量和营养成分含量的影响[J].中国草地,1990,12 (4):6-9.
    22.段淳清.内蒙古草地资源现状及其可持续利用对策[J].内蒙古草业,2006,18 (3):21-25.
    23.傅林谦,祝廷成.沙地飞播植被演替规律初探[J].草业科学,1993,10 (5):12-16.
    24.葛滢,刘庚长,张宝田.松嫩平原重碱地改良方法的初步研究[C].见:中国草地科学研究与反战战略-中国草原学会第三届代表大会暨第五次全国学术会议论文选编.1990,223-226.
    25.关世英,常全宝,贾树海,李绍良,陈有君,王玉芬.草原暗栗钙土退化过程中土壤性状及其变化规律的研究[J].中国草地,1997a,(3):39-43.
    26.关世英,齐佩钦,康师安,常进宝.不同放牧强度对大针茅草原土壤营养含量的影响[C].见:草原生态系统研究,第5集.北京:科学出版社.1997b,17-22.
    27.顾新运,李淑秋.放牧强度对草原土壤超显微特征的影响[C].见:草原生态系统,第5集.北京:科学出版社.1997 :80-87.
    28.高盛香.柠条带间补播优良牧草是黄土高原丘陵山地及沙地自然植被恢复的有效途径[J].内蒙古教育学院学报, 1997,(2~3):193-196.
    29.高琼,李建东,郑慧莹.碱化草地景观动态及其对气候变化的响应与多样性和空间格局的关系[J].植物学报,1995,38 (1):18-30.
    30.胡中民,樊江文,钟华平.中国草地地下生物量研究进展[J].生态学杂志,2005,24 (9):1095-1101.
    31.胡民强,方热军,刑廷铣.施用鹅粪与化肥对牧草生物量和土壤肥力的影响[J].草业科学,1995,12 (3):10-13.
    32.侯丰.科尔沁西部天然草地有毒有害植物及其防治措施[J].草业科学,1995,12 (5):29-34.
    33.侯扶江,李广,常生华.放牧草地健康管理的生理指标[J].应用生态学报,2002a,13 (8):1049-1053.
    34.侯扶江,南志标,肖金玉,常生华.重牧退化草地的植被、土壤及其耦合特征[J].应用生态学报,2002b,13 (8):915-922.
    35.侯红乾,李世清,南维鸽.冬小麦播种密度和施肥方式对麦田杂草群落组成及生长的影响[J].西北植物学报,2007,27 (9):1849-1854.
    36.韩建国.草地学[M].北京:中国农业出版社.2007.
    37.黄文秀.西南牧业资源开发与基地建设[J].北京:科学出版社.1991,67-69.
    38.黄文娟,于海多,赵兰坡.松嫩羊草草原植被与土壤的耦合关系[J].草地学报,2006,14 (1):62-66.
    39.贾慎修,贾志海,史德宽.补播是退化改良草地的有效途径[J].草业科学,1989, 6 (6):8-10.
    40.贾树海,王春枝,孙振涛,李绍良,陈有君,靳存旺.放牧强度和时期对内蒙古草原土壤压实效应的研究[J].草地学报,1999,7 (3):217-222.
    41.贾树海,李绍良,陈有君,董海峰,郭宝峰.草场退化与恢复改良过程中土壤物理性质和水分状况初探.见:草原生态系统研究,第5集.北京:科学出版社.1997,111-117.
    42.姜恕.草地生态研究方法[M].北京:中国农业出版社.1988,15-21.
    43.寇明科,王安碌,徐占文,卓玛加,马玉明,张生璨,苗建勋,康秀芬.应用综合配套技术措施提高天然草地产草量的试验[J].草业科学,2003,20 (3):50-52.
    44.李月树,祝廷成.羊草种群地上部生物量形成规律的探讨[J].植物生态学与地植物学丛刊,1983,7 (4):289-298.
    45.李永宏.内蒙古锡林河流域羊草草原和大针茅草原在放牧影响下的分异和趋同[J].植物生态学与地植物学学报,1988,(3):189-196.
    46.李永宏.放牧影响下羊草草原与大针茅草原植物多样性的变化[J].植物学报,1993,35 (11):875-884.
    47.李永宏.内蒙古草原草场放牧退化模式研究及退化监测专家系统雏议[J].植物生态学报,1994,18 (1):68-79.
    48.李存焕,马志广,何为平.草甸草原生产力、承载力及改良技术研究[J].内蒙古畜牧科学,1996, (3):5-8.
    49.李昌平,杨政.不同补播方式改良草地的效果评价(初报)[J].草业科学,1989,6 (2):39-41.
    50.李松.豆科牧草对土壤酶活性及肥力的影响研究.草业科学,1993,10 (5):20-23.
    51.李金花,李镇清.放牧对星毛委陵菜(Potentillaacaulis)种群生殖对策的影响.草业学报,2002.11 (3):92-96.
    52.李建东,刘建新.羊草草原施用氮肥的研究初报[J].中国草地,1981,(3):58-59.
    53.李建东,刘建新.羊草草原施肥的初步研究[J].吉林农业科学,1983,(2):80-85.
    54.李政海,王炜.火烧对典型草原改良的效果[J].干旱区资源与环境,1994,8 (4):51-60.
    55.李博.中国的草原.北京:科学出版社.1990,234~235.
    56.李博.中国北方草地退化及其防治对策[J].中国农业科学,1997,30 (6):1-9.
    57.李博,雍世鹏,李忠厚.锡林河流域植被及其利用.见:草原生态系统研究第3集.北京:科学出版社.1988,84-183.
    58.李博,雍世鹏,李忠厚.锡林河流域植被及其利用.见:草原生态系统研究第3集.北京:科学出版社.1998,94-181.
    59.李绍良,贾树海,陈有君.内蒙古草原土壤的退化过程及自然保护区在退化土壤的恢复与重建中的作用[J].内蒙古环境保护,1997,(1):17-18.
    60.陆佩玲.中国木本植物物候对气候变化的响应研究[D].北京:北京林业大学.2006.
    61.芦满济,杜福成,杨志爱.冷温半干旱黄土丘陵区荒坡地沙打旺系统生态效能的调查研究[J].草业科学,1994. (2):50-51.
    62.刘正学.呼伦贝尔羊草草原施用微量元素试验报告[J].中国草地,1979,(1):34-41.
    63.刘法涛.适宜低湿草场补播的百麦根与乌拉尔甘草[J].草业科学,1995,(4):29-30.
    64.刘莉莉,胡克,介冬梅,刘玉英,,杨俊鹏.退化羊草草地生态恢复过程中大型土壤动物群落生态特征[J].生态环境,2005a,14 (6):908-912.
    65.刘伟,周华坤,周立.不同程度退化草地生物量的分布模式[J].中国草地,2005,27 (2):9-15.
    66.刘树强,史有财,李茂林.羊草草地松土复壮效果研究[J].草业科学,1989,6 (3):50-53.
    67.刘艳萍,荣浩,邢恩德.不同措施对退化草地土壤和植被的影响[J].水土保持研究,2007,14 (6):364-366.
    68.刘钟龄,王炜,郝敦元,梁存柱.内蒙古草原退化与恢复演替机理的探讨[J].干旱区资源与环境,2002,16 (1):84-91.
    69.龙章富,刘世贵.退化草地土壤农化性状与微生物区系研究[J].土壤学报,1996,33 (2):192-200.
    70.吕贻忠,赵玉萍,夏荣基.内蒙古锡林河流域栗钙土腐殖质特性的研究. I:围栏与自由放牧条件下土壤腐殖质特性的变化[C].见:草原生态系统研究,第4集..北京:科学出版社.1992,171-180.
    71.马克平,黄建辉,于顺利.北京东灵山地区植物群落多样性的研究[J].生态学报,1995,15 (3):268-277.
    72.马志广.松土改良草地的研究[J].中国草地,1982,(2):31-34.
    73.马志广,色音巴图,任志弼.浅耕翻改良草原的研究[J].中国农业科学,1979, (3):90-96.
    74.马志广,陈敏.草地改良理论、方法与趋势[J].中国草地,1994, (4):63-66.
    75.马志广,陈敏,聂素梅,王育青,闫志坚,安渊,杨志伟.蒙吉陕三省半干旱区退化草原改良配套技术研究[J].草地学报,1999,7 (2):95-105.
    76.马青山,王世俊,黄立铭.河南天然草地施肥灌溉试验报告[J].青海草业,2002,(4):7-9
    77.内蒙古自治区农调队.1~9月份内蒙古自治区农村牧区经济形势分析.2004,9.27.
    78.聂素梅,王育青,杨志伟.浅耕翻改良退化草场的技术[J].中国草地,1991,(4):31-34.
    79.潘庆民,白永飞,韩兴国,杨景成.氮素对内蒙古典型草原羊草种群的影响[J].植物生态学报,2005,29 (2)::311-317.
    80.祁德才,沈继宏,刘光俭.固原东部半干旱黄土丘陵区干旱草原草场改良方法初探[J].草业科学,1990,7 (5):62-65.
    81.邱波,罗燕江.不同施肥梯度对甘南退化高寒草甸生产力和物种多样性的影响[J].兰州大学学报(自然科学版),2004,40 (3):56-59.
    82.邱新法,曾燕,缪启龙.我国沙尘暴的时空分布规律及其源地和移动路径[J].地理学报.2001,56 (3):316~322.
    83.钱迎倩,马克平.生物多样性研究的原理与方法[M].北京:中国科学技术出版社.1994.
    84.萨赫都拉,霍曼.碎马草及其防治措施.草业科学,1992,9 (5):36-37.
    85.任继生.蒿属退化草场松土补播改良试验.见:中国北方天然草原改良技术交流会议资料汇编.1986,43-48.
    86.任继生,雷特生,冯克明,张学洲,阿依丁,李学森,穆合塔尔.旱作红豆草人工草地建植管理利用技术的研究[J].草原与草坪,1996,(2):16-19.
    87.戎郁萍,韩建国,王培.施氮与株丛切割对退化新麦草草地的改良效果[J].草地学报,1999,7 (2):157-164.
    88.山薇,杨晓东,刘雅玲. 1997.我国草地畜牧业的地位、问题及发展对策.中国草地,(1):64-66.
    89.沈景林,孟杨,胡文良,连大伟.高寒地区退化草地改良试验研究[J].草业学报, 1999,8 (1):
    90.沈景林,谭刚,乔海龙,张娟华,孟杨.草地改良对高寒退化草地植被影响的研究[J].中国草地,2000,(5):49-54.
    91.邵玉琴,敖晓兰,宋国宝,刘瑞凤,李华.皇甫川流域退化草地和恢复草地土壤微生物生物量的研究[J].生态学杂志,2005,24 (5):578-580.
    92.田淑芳,王小牛.卫星遥感技术在内蒙古多伦县土地沙化调查中的应用[J].现代地质.2000,14 (4):459-464.
    93.涂鹤龄,曹致中,柴惠.克芜踪净化红豆草播种地杂草试验[J].草业科学,1995,12 (3):40-43.
    94.王玉林,罗新义,柴凤久,袁有福,车启华.万亩草场丰产的综合技术措施[J].养殖技术顾问,1986,(1):55-58.
    95.王波,刘生元,刘文志.羊草草甸草原喷施石油助长剂的效果[J].中国草地学报,1988,(6):56.
    96.王殿武,刘树庆,文宏达,高如泰,谢建治.高寒半干旱区春小麦田施肥及水肥耦合效应研究[J].中国农业科学,1999,32 (5):62-68.
    97.王启基,王文颖,邓自发.青海海北地区高山嵩草草甸植物群落生物量动态及能量分配[J].植物生态学报,1998,22 (3):222-230.
    98.王炜,梁存柱,刘钟龄,郝敦元.羊草+大针茅草原群落退化演替机理的研究[J].植物生态学报,2000,24 (4):468-472.
    99.王炜,刘钟龄,郝敦元,梁存柱.内蒙古草原退化群落恢复演替的研究Ⅰ:退化草原的基本特征与恢复演替动力[J].植物生态学报,1996a,20 (5):449-459.
    100.王炜,刘钟龄,郝敦元,梁存柱. 1996b.内蒙古草原退化群落恢复演替的研究Ⅱ:恢复演替时间进程的分析.植物生态学报, 20 (5):460-471.
    101.王进欣,张一平,王今殊.植物群体受光结构与光截获研究综述[J].生态农业研究,2000,8 (3):13-16.
    102.汪仁,高玉春,苏盛发.辽西褐土地区沙打旺磷肥肥效研究[J].草业科学,1990,7 (1):61-63.
    103.汪诗平,李永宏.放牧绵羊行为生态学研究V.采食行为参数与草地状况的关系[J].草业学报,1997,6 (4):31-38.
    104.汪诗平,李永宏,王艳芬,韩苑鸿.不同放牧率下冷蒿小禾草草原放牧演替规律及数量分析[J].草地学报,1998,6 (4):299-305.
    105.乌恩旗,张国昌,刘春晓.羊草草原改良措施与效果[J].草地学报,2001,9 (4):290-295.
    106.武霞,杨晓松,沈景林,张成武,郭瑞萍,白雪,李海龙,唐鸿宇.不同改良措施对盐碱化草地改良效果研究[J].青海畜牧兽医杂志,2007,37 (1):9-11.
    107.卫智军.内蒙古草业研究论文集[M].呼和浩特市:内蒙古人民出版社.2004.
    108.吴光元.喷施三十烷醇对羊草增产的生理效应[J].中国草地,1984,(2):78-79.
    109.吴晓海,贾慎修.黑龙江省松嫩草场的退化原因及其治理[J].中国草地,1991,(9):66-69.
    110.肖力宏,宝音陶格涛,刘海林.草地退化的原因及退化草地改良的研究[J].科学管理研究,2004,22 (8):27-29.
    111.肖运峰,李世英.羊草草原放牧退化演替及其退化原因分析[J].中国草地,1980,(3):20-27.
    112.闫志坚,王育青,安渊.北方半干旱区弃耕地草场补播技术[J].中国草地,1999,(5):19-24.
    113.闫志坚,扬持.中国西北半干旱区弃耕地植被恢复技术的研究—Ⅰ.弃耕地补播技术研究[J].内蒙古大学学报(自然科学版), 2005,36 (4):467-474.
    114.闫敏华,邓伟,马学慧.大面积开荒扰动下的三江平原近45年气候变化[J].地理学报,2001,56 (2):159~170.
    115.姚支春.人工苜蓿草地浅耕翻改良效果的观察[J].草与畜杂志,1992,(1):13-15.
    116.姚爱兴,李平.不同放牧制度下奶牛对多年生黑麦草/白三叶草地土壤特性的影响[J].草地学报,1996,4 (2):95-102.
    117.袁有福.重耙松土改良退化羊草草场的研究[J].中国草地,1984,(4):18-22.
    118.袁有福,罗新义.半干旱低产草地改良配套技术的研究[J].黑龙江畜牧科技,1992,(1):17-24.
    119.叶笃正,丑纪范,刘纪远,张增祥,王一谋,周自江,鞠洪波,黄签.关于我国华北沙尘天气的成因与治理对策[J].地理学报,2000,55 (5):513-520.
    120.杨汝荣.我国西部草地退化原因及可持续发展分析[J].草业科学,2002,19 (1):23-27.
    121.杨利民,王仁忠,李建东.松嫩平原主要草原群落放牧干扰梯度对植物多样性的影响[J].草地学报,1999,7 (1)::8-16.
    122.杨利民,韩梅,李建东.中国东北样带草地群落放牧干扰植物多样性的变化[J].植物生态学报,2001,25 (1):110-114.
    123.杨持,叶波,邢铁鹏.草原区域气候变化对物种多样性的影响[J].植物生态学报,1996,20 (1):35-40.
    124.于洪军,徐贵军,张学丽.沙地低产退化草地改良试验报告[J].中国草地,1999,(2):26-29.
    125.尹力初,蔡祖聪.长期不同施肥对玉米田间杂草种群组成的影响[J].土壤,2005,37 (1):56-60.
    126.于强,谢贤群,孙菽芬.植物光合生产力与冠层蒸散模拟研究进展[J].生态学报,1999,19 (5):744-753.
    127.张大勇.植物生活史进化与繁殖生态学[M].北京:科学出版社.2004.
    128.张佳华.影响植被内部辐射状况的冠层结构特征研究[J].气象科学,2000,20 (1):15-22.
    129.张武舜,孙休荣,苏红.江苏沿海滩涂牧草混播的增产效果[J].草与畜杂志,1992,(2):17-19.
    130.张建华.不同耕翻深度对羊草根茎营养物的影响研究[J].草业学报,1993,10 (5):45-47.
    131.张娜,梁一民.黄土丘陵区天然草地地下/地上生物量的研究[J].草业学报,2002,11 (2):72~78.
    132.张伟华,关世英,李跃进.不同牧压强度对草原土壤水分、养分及其地上生物量的影响[J].干旱区资源与环境,2000a,14 (4):61-64.
    133.张伟华,关世英,李跃进,武永智.不同恢复措施对退化草地土壤水分和养分的影响[J].内蒙古农业大学学报,2000b,21 (4):31-35.
    134.张卫国.试论草地的补播改良[J].草业科学,1990,7 (2):57-59.
    135.张继义,赵哈林,张铜会,赵学勇.科尔沁沙地植被恢复系列上群落演替与物种多样性的恢复动态[J].植物生态学报,2004,28 (1):86-92.
    136.赵云英,谢永生,郝明德.黄土旱塬小麦长期施肥的产量效应及土壤肥力变化[J].西北农业学报, 2007,16 (5):75-79.
    137.赵彪.利用白花草木樨改田治盐[J].草与畜杂志,1993,(2):25.
    138.赵晓霞,孙静萍,张自学.典型草原放牧后植物种的多样性分析[J].中国草地,2000,(2):21-23.
    139.周怀平,杨治平,李红梅,关春林.施肥和降水年型对旱地玉米产量及水分利用的影响[J].干旱地区农业研究,2004,22 (3):27-31.
    140.周道玮,李月胜.草原火烧后土壤微生物的变化[J].东北师大学报:自然科学版.1999a,(1):118-124.
    141.周道玮,周维.草原火烧后土壤水分含量的变化[J].东北师大学报:自然科学版.1999b,(1):97-102.
    142.周道玮,胡勇军.草原植物高生长、体内水分和叶绿素含量对火烧的反应[J].东北师大学报:自然科学版, 1999c,(4):91-95.
    143.周道玮,祝玲.不同时间草地火烧后群落地上生物量结构的变化[J].应用生态学报,1996,7 (3):280-282.
    144.周道玮,刘仲龄.火烧对羊草草原植物群落组成的影响[J].应用生态学报,1994,5 (4):371-377.
    145.周道玮,孙刚.火烧后草原植物营养和热值的变化[J].东北师大学报:自然科学版,1999d,(4):100-104.
    146.周道玮,张宝田.松嫩草原不同时间火烧后植物个体特征变化分析[J].应用生态学报,1995,6 (3):271-276.
    147.周兴民,王启基,师生波.中国蒿草草甸.北京:科学出版社.2001.
    148.钟章成.植物种群的繁殖对策[J].生态学杂志,1995,14 (1):37-42.
    149.Abrahamson, W., Gadgil, M. Growth form and reproductive effort in goldenrods (Solidago, Compositae). American Naturalist, 1973, 107 (957):651-661.
    150.Andren, O., Paustian, K. Barley straw decomposition in the field: aeomparison of models[J]. Ecology, 1987. (43):l-20.
    151.Arnon, I. Physiolgical Principles of Dry and Crop Production. In Gupta,U.S.(ed) Physiogical Aspects of Dry and Land Farming. 1975.
    152.Azooz, H., Arshad, M. Soil Infiltration and hydraulic conductivity under long-term no-tillage and conventional tillage systems Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 1996, (76):143-152.
    153.Bassirirad, H. Kiuetics of nutrient uptake by roots: Responses to global change. New Phytol., 2000, (147):155-169.
    154.Binnie, R. C., Chestnutt, D. M. B. Effect of regrowth interval on the productivity of swards defoliated by cutting and grazing. Grass and Forage Science, 1991, 46 (4):343-350.
    155.Boix-Fayos, C., Calvo-Cases, A., Imeson, A. Influence of soil properties on the aggregation of some Mediterranean soils and the use of aggregate size and stability as land degradation indicators. Catena, 2001, (44):47-67.
    156.Briske, D. Plant response to defoliation: morphological consideration sand allocation priorities. InProceedings of the 2nd International Rangeland Congress,the Australia Academy of Science,Canberra, 1986, 425~427.
    157.Burke, I., Yonker, C., Parton, W. Texture, climate, and cultivation effects on soil organic matter content in U. S. grassland soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. J., 1989, (53):800-805.
    158.Campbell, G. S. Extinction coefficients for radiation in plant canopies calculated using an ellipsoidal inclination angle distribution[J]. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 1986, 36: 317-321.
    159.Chapin, F. The mineral nutrition of wild plants[J]. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 1980, (11):233-260.
    160.Christensen, N. L. Short term effects of mowing and burning on soil nutrient in Big Meadow, Shenandoah national park [J]. J Range Manage, 1976, 29 (6):508-509.
    161.Clark, F., Paul, E. The mierof1ora of rangeland [J]. Adv. Agron., l970, (22):375-435.
    162.Clarke, P. Composition of grazed and cleared temperate grassy woodlands in eastern Australia: patterns in space and inferences in time [J]. J Veg Sci, 2003, (14):5-14.
    163.Clements, F. Plant succession and indicators. Wilson, New York. 1928.
    164.Clements, F. Nature and structure of the climax[J]. J. Ecol, 1936, (24):252-284.
    165.Cocper, P. The effect of nitrogen supply on growth,water use and yields of barley(cv.beecher) at five locations in northen Syria. In Soil Water and Nutrient Research. 1979-1980.
    166.Coupland, R. Grassland ecosystems of the world: analysis of grasslands and their uses (part 2: natural temperate grasslands) Cambridge Cambridge University Press. 1979.
    167.Dale, M., Causton, D. The ecophysiology of Veronica chamaedrys, V. montana and V. officinalis. III : Effects of shading on the phenology of biomass allocations: a field experiment[J]. Journal of Ecology, 1992, 80 (3):505-515.
    168.Deans, W., Milton, S., Ryan, P., Moloney, C. The role of disturbance in the establishment of indigenous and alien plants at Inaccessible and Nightingale Islands in the South Atlantic Ocean[J]. Vegetatio. 1994, (113):13-23.
    169.Diaz, S., Cabido, M. Plant functional types and ecosystem function in relation to global change[J]. Journal of Vegetation Science. 1997, (8):463~474.
    170.Dickinson, R., Shaikh, M., Bryant, R., Graumlich, L. Interactive canopies for a climate model[J]. J. Climate, 1998, (11):2823-2836.
    171.Donald, C. The interaction of competition for light and nutrients Australian Journal of Agricultural[J] . Research. 1958, (9):421-435.
    172.Donald, C. Competition for light in crops and pasture. Mechanisms in biological competition[J]. Symposia of the Society for Experimental Biology, 1961, (15):282-313.
    173.Dong, M. Morphological responses to local light conditions in clonal herbs from contrasting habitats, and their modification due to physiological integration[J]. Oecologia, 1995, (101):282~288.
    174.Dong, M., During, H., Werger, M. Morphological responses to nutrient availability in four clonal herbs[J]. Plant Ecology. 1996, 123 (2):183-192.
    175.Dorrough, J., Ash, J., McIntyre, S. Plant responses to livestock grazing frequency in an Australiantemperate grassland [J]. Ecography, 2004, (27):798-810.
    176.Dougherty, C. T., Rhykerd, C. L. The role of nitrogen in forage animal production[C]. In M.E. Heath (Ed.), forage: The science of grassland agriculture, lowa State University Press, U.S.A. 1985, 318-325:
    177.Drake, M., Colhvw, G., Bredakis, E. Yield of orchard grass as influenced by rates of nitrogen and harvest management [J]. Agronomy Journal. 1963, 55:361-362.
    178.DTilman, Lehman, C. Human-caused environmental change: Impacts on plant diversity and evolution [J]. Proce Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2001, 98:5433-5440.
    179.Dudley, S., Schmitt, J. Testing the adaptive plasticity hypothesis: density-dependent selection on manipulated stem length in Impatiens capensis [J]. Am. .Nat., 1996, (147):445~495.
    180.Fedorenko, D. F., Fernández, O., Busso, C. Phenology ofMedicago minimaandErodium cicutariumin semi-arid Argentina [J]. Journal of Arid Environments. 1996, (33):409-416.
    181.Finzi, A., Breemen, N., Canham, C. Canopy tree-soil interactions within temperate forests: Species effects on soil carbon and nitrogen [J]. Ecological Applications. 1998, (8):440-446.
    182.Fleisher, Z., J.Hagin. Lowering ammonia volatilization losses from urea application by activation of nitrification process [J]. Fertilizer Research. 1981, (2):101-107.
    183.Follett, R. H., D G Westfall, Shanahan, J. F., Lybecker, D. W. Nitrogen fertilization of mountain meadows [J]. J. Prod. Agri, 1995, 8 (2):239-243.
    184.Frank, A., Tanaka, D., Hofmann, L. Soil carbon and nitrogen of Northern Great Plains grasslands as influenced by long-term grazing [J]. J. Range Manage. 1995, 48 (5):470-474.
    185.Fresquez, P. R., Francis, R. E., Dennis, G. L. Soil and vegetation responses to sewage sludge on a degraded semiarid broom snake weed/blue grama plant community [J]. Journal of Range Management. 1990, 43:325-331.
    186.Gedroc, J., McConnaughay, K., Coleman, J. Plasticity in root/shoot partitioning: optimal, ontogenetic, or both? [J]. Functional Ecology. 1996, 10 (1): 44-50.
    187.Gleason, H., Cronquist, A. Manual of Vascular Plants of Northeastern United States and Adjacent Canada. 2nd edn. New York:. The New York Botanical Garden. 1993.
    188.Grainger, A., Stafford, S. M. Desertification and climate change: The case for greater convergence [J]. Mitigat A dapt Strat Global Change. 2000, 5361~377.
    189.Grubb, P. The maintenance of species richness in plant communities: the importance of the regeneration niche[J]. Biol Rev, 1977, (52):107-145.
    190.H.利思. 1984.物候学与季节性模式的建立.北京:科学出版社.
    191.Hadar, L., Noy-Meir, I., Perevolotsky, A. The effect of shrub clearing and grazing on the composition of a Mediterranean plant community: functional groups versus species [J]. Journal of Vegetation Science. 1999, (10):673~682.
    192.Hartemink, N., Jongejans, E., Kroon, H. d. Flexible life history responses to flower and rosette bud removal in three perennial herbs[J]. Oikos, 2004, 105 (1):159-167.
    193.Heady, H. F., Child, R. D. Rangeland Ecology & Management West view Press, Bouder, Colorado.1994a.
    194.Heady, H. F., Child, R. D. Rangeland Ecology & Management West view Press, Bouder, Colorado. 1994b.
    195.Hillard, J. B. Effects of lime stone and phosphorus on nutrient availability and coastal Bermuda grass yield on ultisol communications in soil [J]. Science & Plant Analysis. 1992, 23 (1-2):175-188.
    196.Hobbie, S. Effects of plant species on nutrient cycling[J]. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 1992, (7):336-339.
    197.Hobbs, R., Huenneke, L. Disturbance, diversity, and invasion: implications for conservation [J]. Conserv Biol. 1992, (6):324-337.
    198.Hornetz, B., Shisanya, C., Gilonga, N. Cropwater relationships and thermal adaptation of kathika beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) and green grams (Vignaradiate L.) with special reference to temporal patterns of potential growth in the drylands of SE Kenya [J]. Journal of Arid Environments, 2001, (48):591-601.
    199.Hunt, R., Nicholls, R. Stress and coarse control of growth and root-shoot partiting in herbaceous plant [J]. Oikos. 1986, (47):149-158.
    200.Inouye, R., Huntly, N., Tilman, D., JR.Tester. Pocket gophers (Geomys bursarius),vegetation, and soil nitrogen along a successional sere in east central Minesota [J]. Oecologia(Berlin), 1987, (72):178-184.
    201.Jin, L., John, A., Duggin, William, A., Loneragan, Carl, D., Grant. Grassland responses to multiple disturbances on the New England Tablelands in NSW, Australia[J]. Plant Ecol. 2007, (193):39-57.
    202.Johnston, A., Dormaar, J. F., Smoliak, S. Long-term grazing effects on fescue grass land soil [J]. Journal of Range Management, 1971, 25: 246~250.
    203.Johnston, A., Peake, R. W. Effect of selective grazing by sheep on the control of leafy spurge (Euphorbia esula L.)[J]. Journal of Range Management, 1960, 13: 192~195.
    204.Kishi, H. Studies on competition between grasses and legumes in mixed swards 7 Comparisons of the capacity of pasture plants grown in isolation to spread by forming tillers or branches[J]. Proceedings of the Crop Science Society of Japan. 1975, (44):419-424.
    205.Krueger, W. C., Laycock, W. A., Price, D. A. Relationships of taste, smelt, sight, and touch to forage selection [J]. Journal of Range Management. 1974, 27:258~262.
    206.Krueger, W. C., Laycock, W. A., Price, D. A. Relationships of taste, smelt, sight, and touch to forage selection [J]. Journal of Range Management. 1974, 27:258~262.
    207.Landsberg, J., Lavorel, S., Stol, J. Grazing response groups among understorey plants in arid rangelands [J]. Journal of Vegetation Sciences, 1999, (10):683~696.
    208.Laska, G. The disturbance and vegetation dynamics:a review and an alternative framework[J]. Plant Ecol, 2001, (157):77-99.
    209.Lavorel, S., Garnier, E. Predicting changes in community composition and ecosystem functioning from plant traits: revisiting the Holy Grail [J]. Funct Ecol. 2002, (16):545-556.
    210.Lavorel, S., Lepart, J., Debussche, M., Lebreton, J., Beffy, J. Small scale disturbances and themaintenance of species diversity in Mediterranean old fields[J]. Oikos. 1994 a, (70):455-473.
    211.Lavorel, S., O'Neill, R., Gardner, R. Spatiotemporal dispersal strategies and annual plant species coexistence in a structured landscape[J]. Oikos. 1994b, (71):75-88.
    212.Li, J., Loneragan, W., Duggin, J., Grant, C. Issues affecting the measurement of disturbance response patterns in herbaceous vegetation-A test of the intermediate disturbance hypothesis[J]. Plant Ecol, 2004, (172):11-26.
    213.Magda, D., Jarry, M. Prediction of mowing effects on a population of Chaerophyllum aureum-a demographic approach [J]. Journal of Vegetation Science. 2000, (11):485-492.
    214.Matson, P. Plant-soil interactions in primary succession at Hawaii Volcanoes National Park[J]. Oecologia, 1990, (85):241-246.
    215.McInnis, M. L., Vavra, M., Krueger, W. C. A comparison of four methods used to determine the diets of large herbivores[J]. Journal of Range Management. 1983, 36:303~306.
    216.McIntyre, S., Lavorel, S., Landsberg, J. Disturbance response in vegetation-towards a global perspective on functional traits[J]. Journal of Vegetation Science. 1999, 10.
    217.McIntyre, S., Lavorel, S., Tremont, P. Plant lifehistory attributes: their relationship to disturbance response in herbaceous vegetation [J]. J Ecol. 1995, (83):31-44.
    218.McIntyre, S., Martin, T. Biophysical and human influences on plant species richness in grasslands: Comparing variegated landscapes in subtropical and temperate regions [J]. Austral Ecol. 2001, ( 26):233-245.
    219.McNaughton, S., Ruess, R., Seagle, S. Large mammals and process dynamics in African eco systems [J]. BioScience, 1988, (38):794-800.
    220.McNaughton, S. J., Tarrants, J. L., McNaughton, M. M., Davis, R. H. Silica as a defense against herbivory and a growth promotor in Africa grasses [J]. Ecology. 1985, (66):528-535.
    221.MeNaughton, S. Ecology of grazing ecosysrem: the Serengeti [J]. Eeol Monogr. 1985. (55):259-294.
    222.Miller-Goodman, M., Moser, L., Waller, S., Brummer, J. E., Reece, P. Canopy analysis as a technique to characterize defoliation intensity on Sandhills range [J]. J. Range Manage, 1999, 52 (4):357-362.
    223.Moloney, K., Levin, S. The effects of disturbance architecture on landscape-level population dynamics [J]. Ecology. 1996, (77):375-394.
    224.Noy-Meir, I., Oron, T. Effects of grazing on geophytes in Mediterranean vegetation[J]. J Veg Sci, 2001, (12):749-760.
    225.Olff, H., Andel, J. V., Bakker, J. Biomass and shoot/root allocation of five species from a grassland succession series at different combinations of light and nutrient supply [J]. Functional Ecology, 1990, 4 (2):193-200.
    226.Owensby, C. E., Ham, J. M., Knapp, A. K., Auen, L. M. Biomass production and species composition change in a tallgrass prairie ecosystem after long-term exposure to elevated atmospheric CO2. 1999, ( 5):497-506.
    227.Pastor, J., Aber, J., McClaugherty, C., Melillo, J. Aboveground production and N and P cycling alonga nitrogen mineralization gradient on Blandhawk Island, WL [J]. Ecology. 1984, (65):256-268.
    228.Pausas, J., Austin, M. Patterns of plant species richness in relation to different environments: An appraisal [J]. J Veg Sci, 2001, (12):153-166.
    229.Pickett, S., White, P., . The Ecology of Natural Disturbance and Patch Dynamics. Orlando Academic Press. 1985.
    230.Pigott, C., Taylor, K. The distribution of some woodland herbs in relation to the supply of N and P in the soil[J]. Journal of Ecology. 1964, (52):175-185.
    231.Pitman, A., Zhao, M., Desborough, C. Investigating the sensitivity of a land surface scheme`s simulation of soil wetness and evaporation to spatial and temporal leaf area index variability within the global soil wetness project[J]. J.Meteor. Soc., 1999, (77):281-290.
    232.Prieur-Richard, A., Lavorel, S., Linhart, Y., Dos, Santos, A. Plant diversity, herbivory and resistance of a plant community to invasion in Mediterranean annual communities [J]. Oecologia. 2002, (130):96-104.
    233.Prince, S., Goward, S., S, G., K., C. Interannual Atmosphere-Biosphere Variation: Implications for observation and modeling[J]. J.Geophys.Res., 2000, (105):20055-20063.
    234.Rafael, V., Erik, J. V., Pedro, J. Relative growth rate and biomass allocation in 20 Aegilops (Poaceae) species [J]. New Phytol.. 1998, (140):425-437.
    235.Ralphs, M. H., Whitson, T. D., Ueckert, D. N. Herbicide control of poisonous plants [J]. Rangelands. 1991, 13:73-77.
    236.Raupach, M. Studies in the variation of soil reaction. II. Seasonal variations at Baroga, N.S.W [J]. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research. 1951, (2):73-82.
    237.Rebotnov, T. A. The influence of fertilizers on the plant communities of mesophytic grassland. Handbook of Vegetation Science, Part XII. 1977, 461-497.
    238.Reynolds, J., D'Antonio, C. The ecological significance of plasticity in root weight ratio in response to nitrogen: opinion [J]. Plant and Soil. 1996, 185 (1):75-97.
    239.Robertson, G., Huston, M., Evans, F., Tiedje, J. Spatial variability in successional plant community: patterns of nitrogen availability [J]. Ecology. 1988, (69):1517-1524.
    240.Scott, R., Lowther, W. Competition between white clover I Shoot and root competition [J]. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research. 1980, (23):501-507.
    241.Scotter, G. W. Effect of forest fires on the winter range of barren-ground caribou in northern Saskatchewan[J]. Can Wild Manage Bull, 1964, 18 (1):3-5.
    242.Seastedt, T. Maximization of primary and secondary productivity by grazer[J]. The American Naturalist, 1985, (126):559-564.
    243.Sharrow, S. H., Wright, H. A. Proper burning interals for tobosagrass in west Texas based on nitrogen dynamics[J]. J Range Manage. 1977, 30 (5):343-346.
    244.Sims, P., Singh, J. The strueture and function on western Northern Amerioan grasslands.Ⅱ.Intra seasonal dynamies Primary produce reompartments[J]. J. Ecol., 1975, (66):547-572.
    245.Smart, R., Barko, J. Nitrogen nutrition and salinity tolerance of Distichlis spicata and Spartinaalterniflora [J]. Ecology. 1980, 61 (3):630-638.
    246.Sousa, W. The role of disturbance in natural communities[J]. Annu Rev Ecol Syst. 1984a. (15):353-391.
    247.Sousa, W. The role of disturbance in natural communities[J]. Annu Rev Ecol Syst. 1984b, (15):353-391.
    248.Sparks, T., EPJeffree, Jeffree, C. An examination of the relationship between flowering times and temperature at the national scale using long-term phonological records from the UK [J]. International Journal of Biometerology. 2000, (44):82-87.
    249.Steen, E. Root and rhizome dynamics in a perennial grass crop during an animal growth cycle [J]. Journal of Agricultural Research, 1985, 15: 25-30.
    250.Steyn, H., Rooyen, N. V., Rooyen, M. V. The phenology ofNamagualand ephemeralspecies: the effect of sowing date [J]. Journal of Arid Environments. 1996, (32):407-420.
    251.Sultan, S. Evolutionary implications of phenotypic plasticity in plants[J]. Evolutionary Biology, 1987, (21):127-176.
    252.Taylor, B., Parkinson, D., Parsons, W. Nitrogen and lignin content as predictors of litter decay rates: a microcosm test[J]. Ecology. 1989, (70):97-104.
    253.Totland, O. Effects of temperature on performance and phenotypic selection on plant traits in alpineRanunculus acris[J]. Oecologia, 1992, (120):242-251.
    254.Trangmar, B., Yost, R., Wade, M., Uehara, G., Sudjadi, M. Spatial variation of soil properties and rice yield on recently cleared land [J]. Soil Sci. Soc. of Amer. J., 1987, (51):668-674.
    255.Unlü, K., Ozenirler, G., Yurteri, C. Nitrogen fertilizer leaching from cropped and irrigated sandy soil in central Turkey [J]. European Journal of Science, 1999, 50: 609-620.
    256.Vallentine, J. F. Range development and improvements[M]. Brigham Young University Press, Provo. Utah. 1980.
    257.vander, E. M. Some remarks on disturbance and its relations to diversity and stability [J]. J Veg Sci, 1993, (4):733-736.
    258.Vladimirova, S., Mcconnell, D., Kane, M., Henley, R. Morphological plasticity of Dracaena sanderana‘ribbon’in response to four light intensities [J]. Hortscience. 1997, 32 (6):1049-1052.
    259.Vlamis, J. K., Gowans, D. Availability of nitrogen, phosphorus and sulfur after brush burning [J]. J Range Manage, 1961, 14 (1):38-40.
    260.Wang, R., Gao, Q., Chen, Q. Effects of climatic change on biomass and biomass allocation in Leymus chinensis along the North-east China Transect(NECT)[J]. J. Arid Environ.,2003, (54):653-665.
    261.Wang, R., Ripley, E., Zu, Y. Demography of reproductive and biomass allocation of grassland and dune Leymus chinensis on the Songnen Plain, north-eastern China[J]. J. Arid Environ., 2001, (49):289-299.
    262.Warren, S. D., Nevill, M. B., Blackburn, W. H., Garza, N. E. Soil response to trampling under intensive rotation grazing[J]. Soil Science. 1986, (50):1336-1341.
    263.Watkinson, A., Ormerod, S. Grasslands, grazingand biodiversity: editors' introduction[J]. J Appl Ecol, 2001, (38):233-237.
    264.Weiher, E., Werf, A. V. d., Thompson, K. Challenging Theophrastus: A common core list of plant traits for functional ecology [J]. Journal of Vegetation Science. 1999, (10):609~620.
    265.Weiner, J. Allocation, plasticity and allometry in plants [J]. Perspectives in plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics. 2004, 6 (4):207-215.
    266.Weiner, J., Berntson, G., Thomas, S. Competition and growth form in a woodland annual [J]. Journal of Ecology, 1990, (78):459-469.
    267.Welles, J. M., Cohen, S. Canopy structure measurement by gap graztion analysis using commercial instrumentation [J]. Journal of Experimental Botany, 1996, 47 (302):1335-1342.
    268.White, E. M. Heat effect on nutrient release from soils under ponderosa pine [J]. J Range Manage, 1973, 26 (1):22-24.
    269.White, P. Pattern, process and natural disturbance in vegetation [J]. Bot Rev, 1979, (45):229-299.
    270.Wielgolaski, F. Starting dates and basic temperatures in phonological observations of plants [J]. International Journal of Biometerology. 1999, (42):158~168.
    271.Williams, M. Desertification: General debates explored through local studies progress in environmental science [J]. Pro Environ Sci. 2000, 2:229~251.
    272.Williamson, S. C., Detling, J. K., Dodd, J. L. Experimental evaluation of the grazing optimization hypothesis [J]. Journal of Range Management, 1989, 42:149~152.
    273.Wilson, A. The effect of grazing on Australian ecosystems [J]. Proc Ecol Soc Aust, 1990, (16):235-244.
    274.Wilson, J. A review of the evidence on the control of shoot: root ratio in relation to models [J]. Annals of Botany, 1988a, 61 (4):433-449.
    275.Wilson, J. Shoot competition and root competition [J]. Journal of Applied Ecology, 1988b, (25):279-296.
    276.Yoana, C., Lynn, E., Carrol, G. Canopy characteristics of continuously stocked limpograss swards grazed to different heights [J]. Agronomy Journal, 2003, (95):1246-1250.