刈割条件下羊草(Leymus chinensis)组织转化研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
本实验运用组织转化理论和分析方法,研究人工草地上不同刈割起始时间、留茬高度及刈割频率对羊草叶片和植株的再生动态、植被特征、草地生产力及羊草不同器官中可溶性碳水化合物和氮素含量变化的影响,由此解释植物对环境干扰(人工利用)的适应机制,为草地合理利用,制定合理的刈割制度提供理论依据。实验结果表明:
    (1)不同刈割起始时间处理,刈割后第1周至第4周叶片伸长率和发生率差异均显著(P<0.05),但叶片萎蔫率和枯死率差异均不显著;不同刈割频率处理,除第1周叶片萎蔫率差异显著(P<0.05),第4周叶片萎蔫率差异极显著外(P<0.01),其它各参数差异均不显著;留茬高度处理,除6月刈割处理第1周、第2周叶片伸长率差异极显著(P<0.01),6月刈割处理第4周叶片伸长率、第1周叶片发生率及8月刈割处理第4周叶片伸长率差异显著(P<0.05)外,其它各参数差异均不显著。仅就叶片的组织转化速率考虑,6月初开始刈割,留茬高度8cm,叶片组织转化速率最快。
    (2)不同刈割起始时间处理,刈割后第1周至第4周植株的再生速度6月刈割处理极显著高于8月刈割处理(P<0.01);不同刈割频率处理的植株再生速度,除第3周差异显著外(P<0.05),其余几周各处理之间差异均不显著; 留茬高度处理,6月刈割处理第1周、第2周植株再生速度差异显著(P<0.05),其余两周各处理间差异不显著;8月刈割处理第1周、第2周各处理间的植株再生速度差异不显著,第3周、第4周差异显著(P<0.05)。
    (3)不同刈割起始时间的产草量差异不显著;不同留茬高度间的产草量差异显著(P<0.05);不同刈割起始时间与留茬高度间互作效应不显著。6月不同留茬高度刈割处理及CK,在6~8月期间的再生草量差异不显著。
    (4)刈割处理不改变羊草须根本身可溶性碳水化合物的积累规律,只是数量上发生变化。6月刈割处理,刈割后羊草茎基部和根茎中的可溶性碳水化合物含量持续降低;6月刈割处理叶片和8月刈割处理
    
    
    茎基部、叶片和根茎中可溶性碳水化合物含量刈割后先降低,然后升高;刈割后羊草茎基部和叶片中的可溶性碳水化合物含量,留茬12cm处理先降低,然后升高,其它各处理持续下降。因此,刈割时不能留茬过低,再次利用应间隔一定时间,以使牧草贮藏的可溶性碳水化合物含量恢复到较高水平。
    (5)羊草叶片和茎基部中的氮素含量6月均高于8月,须根和根茎中氮素含量差异不显著。再生初期,羊草各器官中的氮素含量刈割处理均低于CK,但经过一段时间后,各刈割处理氮素含量增加并超过CK。刈割后,地上器官中的氮素含量低茬刈割处理高于高茬刈割处理,地下器官恰好相反。因此,一定程度的刈割可以刺激根对土壤中氮素的吸收,促进氮素向地上的生长部位重新分配,提高牧草的营养价值。
     综上,适当刈割可以加快牧草的组织转化速率,提高牧草的营养价值。根据本实验结果,一次刈割以8月初刈割,留茬8cm为宜;就当年的生产效益,可考虑一年刈割两次,刈割时间以6月初和8月初为宜。
To explain the vegetable’s adaptive mechanism when suffered disturbance such as manpower utilization and provide the theoretical base for making the valid cutting system, one experiment was conducted to investigate dynamics of leaf and plant regrowth, characteristics of vegetation, productivity, changes of WSC (water-soluble carbohydrate) and nitrogen in Leymus chinensis at different cutting times, cutting frequency and stubble heights by applying the theory of tissue turnover. The results showed that:
    (1) The leaf enlongation rate and appearance rate differed significantly, not for the other parameters between the two treatments with different initial cutting time. The leaf senescence rates of the first week and fourth week differed significantly, while other parameters were not different between the two frequency treatments. The enlongation rates of the first, second and fourth week after cutting in June differed significantly. The leaf enlongation rates of the first week when cutting happened in August differed significantly, however, other parameters were not different among different stubble heights. The leaf tissue turnover rate was the fastest if the cutting time is set in June and the stubble height is 8cm according to regrowth dynamics.
    (2) The plant regrowth rate was significantly different between the two treatments with different initial cutting time. There was significantly different in the regrowth rate of the third week after cutting between the two frequency treatments, but not for other weeks. The plant regrowth rates of the first and second week after cutting in June, the third and fourth week after cutting in August differed significantly, not for other weeks among stubble height treatments.
    (3) The total dry matter yield did not differ significantly between the two treatments with different initial cutting time. Nevertheless, there were significantly different among stubble height treatments. The interaction between the different initial cutting time and stubble height treatments was
    
    
    not remarkably different. The grass yields of regrowth were not significantly different among stubble height treatments from June to August.
    (4) Cutting treatments did not impact the change of accumulation WSC of the fibrous root. WSC in stem and rhizome decreased after cutting in June,however, WSC in leaf after cutting in June and in stem, leaf and rhizome after cutting in August decreased at first, then increased. WSC in leaf and stem when the stubble height was 8cm decreased at first, and followed increasing. Other treatments kept decreasing after cutting.
    (5) The contents of nitrogen in leaf and stem in June were higher than that in August, and nitrogen content in fibrous root was as much as that in rhizome. The contents of nitrogen in different organs of Leymus chinensis were lower than CK at early days after cutting respectively, and then increased, even exceeded CK. The content of nitrogen at lower stubble height was higher than that at higher stubble with in the belowground organs, opposite to the underground. So appropriate cutting intensity will benefit the increase of nitrogen and improve the nutrition value of herbage.
    Appropriate cutting could increase the tissue turnover rate and quality of forages. Based on the results of this experiment, the cutting time should be set in August and the stubble height should be 8cm if cutting once. Cutting twice annual is also feasible if the benefit in the same year is just considered, and the cutting time should be set in early June and early August.
引文
Hodgson J. Grazing management. Longman Group (FE) Limited, 1990, 45~47
    Hodgson J, Illius A W. The Ecology and Management of Grazing System. CAB International, Wallingford, UK, 1996
    夏景新. 放牧生态学与放牧管理. 中国草地,1993,(4):64~70
    夏景新. 放牧生态系统中组织物质循环及其在牧场管理中的应用. 草地学报,1993,2(2):35~41
    Chapman D F, Lemaire G. Morphogenetic and structural determinants of plant regrowth after defoliation. Proceeding of the X Ⅶ International Grassland Congress, 1993, 95~104
    Hunt L A. Some implications of death and decay in pasture production. Journal of the British Grassland Society, 1965, 2: 27~31
    Alberda Th, Sibma L. Dry matter production and light interception of crop surfaces.Ⅲ. Actual herbage production in different years as compared with potential values. Journal of the British Grassland Society, 1968, 23: 206~215
    Xia J X. The effects of defoliation on tissue turnover and pasture production in perennial ryegrass and Smooth bromegrass pasture. Ph. D thesis, Massey University, New Zealand, 1991
    Davies A. Leaf tissue remaining after Cutting and regrowth in perennial ryegrass. Journal of the British Grassland Society, 1974, 82: 165~172
    Davies A, Calder D M. Patterns of spring growth in sward in different grass varieties. Journal of the British Grassland Society, 214~225
    夏景新,赵益春. 羊茅黑麦草和无芒雀麦叶片再生动态及其与草地管理的关系. 草业科学,1995,12(1):9~12
    常会宁,夏景新. 不同刈割强度对羊茅黑麦草叶片伸长和枯萎的影响. 草地学报,1995,3(4):333~335
    常会宁,夏景新,李志坚,左海涛,丁原春. 刈割对羊茅黑麦草叶片净生长和净牧草积累的影响. 草地学报,1996,4(1):1~5
    常会宁,夏景新,汤胜民,丁原春. 羊茅黑麦草和无芒雀麦叶片生长动态比较. 草业科学,1996,13(1):8~10
    常会宁. 刈割对羊茅黑麦草和无芒雀麦叶片和蘖生长动态及组织转化的影响. 中国农业大学硕士论文,1995,1~6
    刘颖,王德利,王旭等. 不同放牧强度下羊草草地三种禾草叶片再生动态研究. 草业学报,2001,10(4):40~46
    许志信,巴图朝鲁,卫智军,段淳清,赵刚,昭和斯图. 牧草再生与贮藏碳水化合物含量变化关系的研究. 草业学报,1993,2(4):13~18
    
    戎郁萍,韩建国,王培,毛培胜. 刈割强度对新麦草产草量和贮藏碳水化合物及含氮化合物影响的研究. 中国草地,2000,2:28~34
    Donaghy D J, Fulkerson W J. The importance of water–soluble carbohydrate reserves on regrowth and root growth of Lolium perenne. Grass and Forage Science, 1997, 53: 411~418
    Gonzale B, Boucaud J, Salette J. Changes in stubble carbohydrate content during regrowth of defoliated perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne) on two nitrogen levels. Grass and Forage Science, 1989, 45: 422~426
    Orodho A B, Trlica M J. Clipping and long–term grazing effects on biomass and carbohydrate reserves of Indian ricegrass. Journal of Range Management, 1990, 44(1): 53~58
    Bahrani J, Beaty E R, Tan K H. Relationship between carbohydrate, nitrogen contents, and regrowth of tall fescue tillers. Journal of Range Management, 1983, 37(2): 245~246
    Richards J H. Caldwell M M. Soluble carbohydrates, concurrent photosynthesis and efficiency in regrowth following defoliation: a field study with Agropyron species. Journal of Applied Ecology, 1985, 23: 907~921
    Bucher H P, Machler F, Nosberger J. Sink control of assimilate partitioning in meadow fescue (Festuca pratensis). Journal of Plant Physiology, 1987, 130: 480~187
    Bucher H P, Machler F, Nosberger J. Storage and remobilization of carbohydrates in meadow fescue (Festuca pratensis). Journal of Plant Physiology, 1987, 130: 101~109
    Richards J H. Physiology of plants from defoliation. In: Baker M J. Grassland for our Word. New Zealand: Sir Publishing, 47~55
    Christiansen S, Svejcar T. Grazing effects on shoot and root dynamics and above– ground and below–ground non–structural carbohydrate in Caucasian bluestem. Grass and Forage Science, 1988, 44: 97~104
    Welker J, MRykiel E Jr, Briske D. Carbon import among vegetative tillers within two bunchgrasses: Assessment with carbon–11 labelling. Oecologia, 1985, 68: 219~222
    Clement C R, Hopper M J, Jones L H P, Leafe E L. The uptake of nitrate by Lolium perenne from flowing nutrient solution, Ⅱ Effect of light, defoliation and relationship to CO2 flux. Journal of Experiment Botany, 1978, 30: 1184~1193
    Ourry A, Boucaud J, Salette J. Nitrogen mobilization from stubble and roots during regrowth of defoliation perennial ryegrass. Journal of Experiment Botany, 1988, 40: 803~809
    干友民,Schnyder H,Vianden H,Schaeufele R. 多年生黑麦草刈割后再生草碳水化合物及氮素的变化. 草业学报,1999,8(4):65~70
    
    Frank D A, Evans R D. Effects of native grazers on grassland N cycling in Yellowstone National Park. Ecology, 1997, 78(7): 234~2359
    Thornton B, Millard P. Nitrogen uptake by grasses:Changes induced by competing neighbor plants differing in frequency of defoliation. Grassland and Forage Science, 1996, 52: 253~260
    Mullahey J J, Waller S S, Moser L E. Defoliation effects on yield and bud and tiller numbers of two Sandhills grass. Journal of Range Management, 1991, 44(3): 241~245
    仲延凯,包清海,孙维. 内蒙古白音锡勒牧场地区天然草场合理割草制度的研究. 生态学报,1991,11(3):242~249
    Forwood J R, Magai M M. Clipping frequency and intensity effects on big bluestem yield, quality and persistence. Journal of Range Management. 1992, 45(6): 554~559
    杨发林. 连续刈割对紫花苜蓿营养成分的影响. 草与畜杂志,1994,4:37~37
    仲延凯,朴顺姬. 羊草草原割草演替试验结果的分析. 草原生态系统研究,1988,2:158 ~171
    仲延凯,贾志斌. 内蒙古白音锡勒牧场地区天然割草场资源的调查研究. 干旱区资源与环境,1987,1(3~4):95~108
    Jameson D A. Effects of single season and rotation harvesting on cool and warm grasses of a mountain grassland. Journal of Range Management, 1991, 44(4): 327~329
    Aiken G E, Sladden S E and Bransby D I. Cutting height and frequency effects on composition, yield and quality of a Burmuda grass Crabgrass mixture. Journal of Production Agriculture, 1995, 8 (1): 79~83
    Waller S S, Reece P E, Moser L E and Gates G A. 1985. Understanding Grass Growth: The Key to Profitable Livestock Production. Trabon Print Co, Kansas City, Missouri, 1~20
    Clary W P, Booth G D. Early season utilization of mountain meadow riparian pastures. Journal of Range Management, 1993, 46(4): 493~497
    Heady H F, Child R D. Rangeland Ecology and Management. Westview Press, Boulder, Colorado, 1994
    内蒙古农牧学院草原管理教研室. 草地经营. 呼和浩特:内蒙古大学出版社,1989
    Binnie R C, Chestnutt D M B. Effect of regrowth interval on the productivity of swards defoliated by cutting and grazing. Grass and Forage Science, 1991, 46(4): 343~350
    丁迪云,张庆智,黄锚养. 柱花草刈割次数与生产性能的关系. 草业科学,1993,10(1):63 ~64
    
    Grant S A, Barthram G T. The effects of contrasting cutting regimes on the components of clover and grass growth in micro swards. Grass and Forage Science, 1991, 46(1): 1~13
    杨允菲,张宝田. 松嫩平原羊草种群营养繁殖的季节动态及其生物量与密度关系的分析. 植物学报,1 992,34(6):443~449
    刘颖,王德利,王旭,巴雷,孙伟. 放牧后羊草和芦苇叶组织转化的比较. 应用生态学报,2002,13(5):573~576
    许志信,白永飞. 干草原贮藏碳水化合物含量变化规律的研究. 草地学报,1994,3(4):27~31
    于应文,蒋文兰,徐震,冉繁军. 刈割对多年生黑麦草分蘖与叶片生长动态及生产力的影响. 西北植物学报,2002,22(4):900~906
    刘颖,王德利,王旭等. 放牧强度对羊草草地植被特征的影响. 草业学报,2002,11(2):22~28
    霍成君,韩建国等. 刈割期和留茬高度对新麦草产草量及品质的影响. 草地学报,2000,8(4):319~327
    张自和,李向林,高崇岳. 优质饲料种植与草料加工技术. 北京:农业读物出版社,1995,73~74
    赵萌莉,许志信,马春梅,马麟,史智. 年内多次刈割对牧草贮藏养分的影响. 内蒙古农牧学院学报,1999,20(1):13~16
    莫本田,罗天琼,莫志萍,陈培燕. 不同刈割方式对苇状羊茅混播草地生产性能的影响. 四川草原,2001,1:24~27
    刘颖. 羊草草地山羊放牧对牧草再生影响的研究. 东北师大硕士论文,2002
    Davies A. The regrowth of grass sward. In: Jones M B and Lazenby. The Grass Crop. A Chapman and Hall Ltd, London, 85~117
    白可喻,赵萌莉,卫智军,韩国栋,许志信. 贮藏碳水化合物在植物不同部位分布的研究. 内蒙古草业,1995,3(4):53~55
    White L M. Carbohydrate reserves of grass: A review. Journal of Range Management, 1973, 26: 13~18
    许志信,白永飞,赵萌莉,段淳清. 干草原牧草贮藏碳水化合物积累与消耗规律的研究. 内蒙古草业,1995,1(2):49~54
    白永飞,段淳清,额尔敦达来,王明玖,许志信. 刈割对牧草贮藏碳水化合物含量变化的影响. 内蒙古农牧学院报,1994,15(4):48~53
    
    白可喻,赵葫莉,卫智军,韩国栋,许志信. 刈割对荒漠草原几种牧草贮藏碳水化合物的影响. 草地学报,1996,4(2):126~132
    汪诗平. 刈牧牧对草原植物的影响. 生态学杂志,2000,19(6):34~39
    朱志红,孙尚奇. 高寒草甸矮生嵩草非结构碳水化合物的变化. 植物学报,1996,38(11):895~901
    赵萌莉,许志信. 刈割高度对牧草再生性的影响. 内蒙古草业,1998,2(1):40~41
    刘颖,王德利,韩士杰等. 不同放牧率下小花碱茅可溶性碳水化合物和氮素含量的变化. 草业学报,2003,12(4):40~44
    刘颖,王德利,韩士杰等. 不同放牧率下羊草和芦苇可溶性碳水化合物和氮素含量的变化. 应用生态学报,2003,14(12):2167~2170
    李文庆,张民,束怀瑞. 氮素在果树上的生理作用. 山东农业大学学报(自然科学版),2002,33(1):96~100
    荆家海. 植物生理学. 西安:陕西科技出版社,1994
    Christiansen S O, Srejcor T. Grazing effect on shoot and root dynamics and above and below–ground non–structure carbohydrate in Caucasian bluestem. Grass and Forage Science, 1998, 43(2): 111~119
    Ourry B E, Kim T H and Boucaud J. Nitrogen reserve mobilization during regrowth of Medicago sativa L. Journal of Plant Physiology , 1994, 105: 831~837
    Cralle H T, Bovery R W. Total nonstructure carbohydrates and regrowth in honey mequite(Prosopsis glandulosa) following hand defoliation or clip treatment. Weed Science, 1996, 44: 566~569
    王德利,林海峻,金晓明. 吉林西部牧草资源的生物多样性的研究. 东北师范大学学报,1996,3:103~107
    王德利,吕新龙,罗卫东. 不同放牧密度对草原植被特征的影响分析. 草业学报,1996,5(3):28~33
    侯扶江. 放牧对牧草光合作用、呼吸作用和氮、碳吸收与转运的影响. 应用生态学报,2001,12(6):938~942
    Millard P R. Nitrogen supply affects the remobilization of nitrogen for the regrowth of defoliation Lolium perenne. Journal of Experiment Botany. 1990, 41: 941~947