公法哲学意义上的契约论
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
  • 英文题名:Contract Theory in Philosophy of Public Law
  • 作者:于立深
  • 论文级别:博士
  • 学科专业名称:法学理论
  • 学位年度:2005
  • 导师:崔卓兰
  • 学科代码:030101
  • 学位授予单位:吉林大学
  • 论文提交日期:2005-06-01
  • 答辩委员会主席:卓泽渊
摘要
公共领域的基本问题是如何解释个体与共同体的关系,如何在制度上安排和解决个体与共同体的利益冲突问题。这里面有三个基本概念:个体的主体性、共同体的合法性以及个体和共同体各自的效率性。个体与共同体的关系基本上存在三种状态:无政府主义、强制和契约化。实际上,中国的很多公共问题都游离于强制-无政府主义之间,前者如专政、帝制和通过行政命令和强制表现出来的计划国家,后者如军阀混战和公共组织的散沙化(“上有政策,下有对策”,是最好的描述)。
    人权、公权和契约是公法哲学的基本范畴。契约范畴是西方公共领域里最基本、最核心的社会关系范畴。契约首先是一种普遍社会生活现象,而不仅仅是经济现象。经济契约与社会契约并非次第出现的,经济契约对社会契约的影响是很微妙的,契约是整个文明的产物,而不仅仅是商业和工业的结果。霍布斯契约方法论的出现改变了人类公共生活的制度建构和思维模式,也奠定了近现代以来的公法哲学、公共哲学、政治哲学的主题。在全球化的今天,契约论的知识结构和方法论特色将深刻影响及至重新塑造中国公法哲学的理论结构和制度模式。
    当命令和强制不能解决人际交往关系的一片散沙状态时,为什么我们不给契约一个机会呢?只有理解契约这个范式和隐喻,才能理解人类社会及其交往关系,才可能在共同体的共存与个人人格的完整性之间、强制与自由之间、公平与效率之间,找到阿基米德式的支点。
    在社会变迁中,契约方法论担负着重要功能。从霍布斯到高夫,再到罗尔斯和埃拉查……,契约论者一直思考着人类的基本问题,基本问题不是宏大问题,甚至不是重要问题,但是根本问题。
This thesis chooses the basic knowledge and methods on contractual theory, and the basic theory and system on philosophy of public law as researching object. By coordinating contractual knowledge and clearing up many contractual viewpoints, the author tries to reconstruct the system on philosophy of public law and public institutions, and contract is as the core category and methodology.
    This thesis first illuminates the necessity and purpose on constructing the system on philosophy of public law, and simply describes its theory basis: political philosophy, public philosophy, social contract theory, and consent theory. Contract is the jumping-off point of constructing philosophy of public law. Human right, public power and contract are the central categories. They not only have enriched social relational meaning but also have logic orientation. Among the three categories, human right is a purposing and subjecting category, public power is a instrumental and objective category, contract is a medi-category. Philosophy of public law develops itself by the three categories. As a methodology and instrument, contract theory can solve the contradiction between coexistence and individual integrities, justice and efficacy, autonomy and heteronomy in social cooperation.
    This thesis has six chapters.
    Chapter One: Contract as a Pillar Category of Philosophy of Public.
    In ch.1.,the author uses the firsthand materials to analyze the linguistic “contract”, enumerate contractual vocabulary map. By examining the shift in terminology, this thesis describes the histories and mutual relations of the three major English languages: covenant, compact and contract. Contract usually be divided into legal contract and life
    contract, they are used in social communicational sense. In ch.1.,the author introduce Macneil, Selznick and Hugh Collin show to understand the meaning of contract in exchange sense. Political philosophers and scientists think political association as a contractual relation; political exchange theory actually is a contractual theory. Understanding the meaning of contract in exchanging sense, the obstacle among economics, politics, private law and public law will be solved. In ch.1.,the author also anatomized the Chinese legal culture on Meng and Yue. They have comparability with social contract and governmental contract. So we must pay great attention to local knowledge of philosophy of public law. The author also researched the condition from contract category to contractual methodology. Chapter Two: Contract Theory’s Historical Venation and Themes In ch.2.,the author analyzed and generalized the themes, knowledge structure and contractarian pedigrees of contract theory in different times. Hobbes’s contractarianism is a paradigm shift. Hobbes achieved the equivalent of a Copernican revolution in social and political thought. Contract theory is a revolution to Aristotelian “polis”. From ancient Greece to the contemporary era, contract theory go through four historical stages: (1)early contract theory of justice—orientation;(2)governmental contract theory on legitimacy of public power;(3)social contract theory on man-made state;(4)the new contract theory of rational choice —orientation. Anti-contractarians arguments form an integral part of any account of contractarian thinking. Anti-contractarianism includes patriarchalism, feminism, utilitarianism and communitarianism. Chapter Three: The Basis and Types of Contract Theory In ch.3.,the author firstly reviewed Chinese scholars how to understand the link between social contract and common contract. Social contract is the outcome of public law, it have less connect with civil contract and market-oriented economy. Chinese scholars maybe misread the evolutionary path of communitarianism . The social roots of contract theory appear diversity. This thesis anatomized contract stories in political anthropology, religious covenants and ordinary contracts in public life. They play an important role in social theory and practice. At last, the author introduced the new development of modern contract theory in 21 century. It has been more recently recognized that there are two distinct strains of social contract thought, which now typically go by the names “contractarianism”and “contractualism.”
    Chapter Four: Contract Methodology ant it’s Functions In ch.4.,contract theory firstly was divided into two parts: knowledge and methodology. The contract methodology from Hobbes to Rawls is a method of logic reasoning. They have internal connect with natural science methodology. The logic reasoning schema of contract methodology include hypothetical scenario, solutions of the problems and the designs of institutions. Contractual methodology is not a experimental reasoning but logic reasoning, it is Methodological Individualism and subjectivism. The subjects of values of contract methodology focus on subjectivity, equality, justice, reciprocity and efficiency. Contract also is a metaphor and device, it can analyze and explain social communicating phenomenon; it can construct collective life how to be justice and efficiency, and avoid anarchism and coercionism. Chapter Five: the Institutionalization to Contractual idea After Maine’s famous dictum that the progress of the law has been from status to contract, it is an important proposition and formula that human association is from contract to institution. What is the puzzle of contract disappearing? The progress of organization, intervention of public power translate contract into institution. Convention and constitution is a sort of contract. At a democratic angle, procedure and contract have a common sense. The contractual expressions in public law are contractual ideas and institutions, such as dialogue, negotiation, compromise and autonomy. They belong to the pedigree of contract concepts. Public choice theory is a branch of contract theory. It can solve the common understanding problem of opinion in pluralistic society. So contract theory have a special function under spanning the gorge of institution change. Chapter Six: Contractual Choice on the Chinese Public Institution in Future In ch.6.,the key theme is how to use contract methodology to analyze Chinese problem. In one hundred years, Chinese modernization has come up against many different prisoner's dilemmas or social dilemmas, such as how to achieve a justicial and inefficient cooperation, how to balance coexistence and individual integrities in social cooperation. They are important questions of social theory and institution. The author used the knowledge and methodology of contract theory and game theory to anatomize Chinese problems. This thesis constructed two models: “Revolutionary Dilemma”(Sun Zhongshan) and “Monks Shouldering Water”(Bai Yang). The author pointed out China must make a reasonable choice among anarchism, coercion and contractual governance.
引文
1、梁启超:《梁启超哲学思想论文选》,北京大学出版1984 年版。
    2、孙中山:《孙中山全集》第六卷,中华书局1985 年版。
    3、张文显:《法哲学范畴研究》(修订版),中国政法大学出版社2001 年版。
    4、张文显:《二十世纪西方法哲学思潮研究》,法律出版社1996 年版。
    5、彭漪涟主编:《概念论》,学林出版社1991 年版。
    6、冯友兰:《中国哲学史新编》(第一册),人民出版社1982 年版。
    7、何兆武:《苇草集》,三联书店1999 年版。
    8、何兆武:《历史理性批判论集》,清华大学出版社2001 年版。
    9、何怀宏:《契约伦理与社会正义》,中国人民大学出版社1993 年版。
    10、何怀宏:《公平的正义》,山东人民出版社2002 年版。
    11、姚大志:《现代之后——20 世纪晚期西方哲学》,东方出版社2000 年版。
    12、顾肃:《自由主义基本理念》,中央编译出版社2003 年版。
    13、石元康:《当代西方自由主义理论》,上海三联书店2000 年版。
    14、巴发中:《霍布斯及其哲学》,中共中央党校出版社1997 年版。
    15、蔡拓:《契约论研究》,南开大学出版社1987 年版。
    16、蒋先福:《契约文明:法治文明的源与流》,上海人民出版社1999 年版。
    17、王希:《原则与妥协:美国宪法的精神与实践》,北京大学出版社2000 版。
    18、徐国栋:《诚实信用原则研究》,中国人民大学出版社2002 年版。
    19、傅静坤:《二十世纪契约法》,法律出版社1997 年版。
    20、余凌云:《行政契约论》,中国人民大学出版社2000 年版。
    21、颜德如:《梁启超、严复与卢梭社会契约思想》,吉林人民出版社2003 年版。
    22、季卫东:《法律秩序的建构》,中国政法大学出版社1999 年版。
    23、张维迎:《企业的企业家——契约伦理》,上海三联书店1995 年版。
    24、渠敬东编:《现代政治与自然》,上海人民出版社2003 年版。
    25、朱瑞祥:《美国联邦最高法院判例史程》,台北黎明文化事业有限公司1984 版。
    26、《圣经》,中国基督教三自爱国运动委员会、中国基督教协会2002 年版。
    27、[古希腊]柏拉图:《理想国》,郭斌和、张竹明译,商务印书馆1986 年版。
    28、[古希腊]亚里士多德:《政治学》,吴寿彭译,商务印书馆1997 年版本。
    29、[古罗马]西塞罗:《论共和国》,王焕生译,中国政法大学出版社1997 年版。
    30、[美]萨拜因:《政治学说史》,刘山等译,商务印书馆1986 年版。
    31、北京大学哲学系外国哲学史教研室编译:《十六——十八世纪西欧各国哲学》,商务印书馆1975 年版。
    32、[英]霍布斯:《利维坦》,黎思复、黎廷弼译,商务印书馆1985 年版。
    33、[美]米斯纳:《霍布斯》,于涛译,中华书局2002 年版。
    34、[美]施特劳斯:《霍布斯的政治哲学》,申彤译,译林出版社2001 年版。
    35、[英]洛克:《政府论》,叶启芳、瞿菊农译,商务印书馆1997 年版。
    36、[荷]斯宾诺莎:《神学政治论》,温锡增译,商务印书馆1997 年版。
    37、[法]卢梭:《社会契约论》,何兆武译,商务印书馆1997 年版。
    38、[英]休谟:《休谟政治论文选》,张若衡译,商务印书馆1993 年版。
    39、[德]康德:《道德形而上学原理》,苗力田译,上海人民出版社1986 年版。
    40、[德]康德:《法的形而上学原理》,沈叔平译,商务印书馆2001 年版。
    41、[德]康德:《历史理性批判文集》,何兆武译,商务印书馆1990 年版。
    42、[德]黑格尔:《法哲学原理》,范扬、张企泰译,商务印书馆1961 年版。
    43、[英]梅因:《古代法》,沈景一译,商务印书馆1997 年版。
    44、[英]边沁:《政府片论》,沈叔平等译,商务印书馆1997 年版。
    45、[美]庞德:《普通法的精神》,唐前宏、廖湘文、高雪原译,法律出版社2001年版。
    46、[美]罗尔斯:《正义论》,何怀宏、何包钢、廖申白译,中国社会科学出版社1988年版。
    47、[美]罗尔斯:《政治自由主义》,万俊人译,译林出版社2000 年版。
    48、[美]库卡塔斯、佩迪特:《罗尔斯》,姚建宗、高申春译,黑龙江人民出版社1999年版。
    49、[日]川本隆史:《罗尔斯——正义原理》,詹献斌译,河北教育出版社2001 年版。
    50、[美]麦克尼尔:《新社会契约》,雷喜宁、潘勤译,中国政法大学出版社1994年版。
    51、[英]宾默尔:《博弈论与社会契约》第1 卷,王小卫、钱勇译,上海财经大学出版社2003 年版。
    52、[德]哈贝马斯:《在事实与规范之间——关于法律和民主法治国的商谈理论》,童世骏译,三联书店2003 年版。
    53、[德]赫费:《政治的正义性——法和国家的批判哲学之基础》,庞学铨、李张林译,上海译文出版社版1998 年版。
    54、[德] 拉非而:《政治哲学中的论题》,王玉钟、余明贤、胡鸿仁、黄年译,台湾幼师文化事业公司1978 年版。
    55、[德]卡西尔:《国家的神话》,范进、杨君游、柯锦华译,华夏出版社1999 年版。
    56、[德]卡西勒:《启蒙哲学》,顾伟铭、杨光仲、郑楚宣译,山东人民出版社1988年版。
    57、[美]布坎南、塔洛克:《同意的计算——立宪民主的逻辑基础》,中国社会科学出版社2000 年版。
    58、James M.Buchanan:《自由的界限——无政府与利维坦之间》,顾肃译,台北联经出版事业公司2002 年版。
    59、[澳]布伦南、[美]布坎南:《宪政经济学》,冯克利等译,中国社会科学出版社2004 年版。
    60、[美]诺齐克:《无政府、国家与乌托邦》,王建凯译,台北时报文化出版社企业股份有限公司1996 年版。
    61、[美]雅赛:《重申自由主义》,陈茅、徐力源、刘瑞春等译,中国社会科学出版社1997 年版。
    62、[美]桑德尔:《自由主义与正义的局限性》,万俊人等译,译林出版社2001 年版。
    63、[美]卡罗尔·帕特曼:《性契约》,李朝晖译,社会科学文献出版社2004 年。
    64、[美]唐森纳、邓菲:《有约束力的关系——对企业伦理学的一种社会契约论研究》,赵月瑟译,上海社会科学院出版社2001 年版。
    65、[美]乌金、库帕、考克斯:《组织和心理契约》,王新超译,北京大学出版社2000年版。
    66、[美]贝克尔:《18 世纪哲学家的天城》,何兆武译,三联书店2001 年版。
    67、[英]史蒂文 卢克斯:《个人主义》,阎克文译,江苏人民出版社2001 年版。
    68、[爱尔兰]凯利:《西方法律思想简史》,王笑红译,法律出版社2002 年版。
    69、[德]考夫曼:《后现代法哲学》,米健译,法律出版社2000 年版。
    70、[美]伯尔曼:《法律与革命》,贺卫方等译,中国大百科全书出版社1993 年版。
    71、[美]博登海默:《法理学:法哲学与法律方法》,邓正来译,中国政法大学出版社1999 年版。
    72、[英]阿狄亚:《合同法导论》,赵旭东、何帅领、邓晓霞译,法律出版社2002年版。
    73、[日]滋贺秀三等:《明清时期的民事审判与民间契约》,法律出版社1998 年版。
    74、高道蕴、高鸿钧、贺卫方编:《美国学者论中国法律传统》,中国政法大学出版社1994 年版。
    75、[美]科斯等:《契约经济学》,李风圣等译,经济科学出版社1999 年版。
    76、[美]V.奥斯特罗姆等:《制度分析与发展的反思——问题与抉择》,王诚等译,商务印书馆1992 年版。
    77、[德]柯武刚、史漫飞:《制度经济学》,韩朝武译,商务印书馆2002 年版。
    78、[美]奥尔森:《集体行动的逻辑》,陈郁、郭宇峰、李崇新译,上海三联书店1995年版。
    79、盛洪主编:《现代制度经济学》(上册),北京大学2003 年版。
    80、[美]萨瓦斯:《民营化与公私部门的伙伴关系》,周志忍等译,中国人民大学出版社2002 年版。
    81、[美]伊拉扎:《联邦主义探索》,彭利平译,上海三联书店2004 年版。
    82、[美]伦斯特罗姆编:《美国法律辞典》,贺卫方等译,中国政法大学出版社1998年版。
    83、[美]艾杰尔编:《美国赖以立国的文本》,赵一凡、郭国良主译,海南出版社2000年版。
    84、[美]埃尔曼:《比较法律文化》,贺卫方、高鸿钧译,三联书店1990 年版。
    85、[英]哈耶克:《通往奴役之路》,王明毅等译,中国社会科学出版社1997 年版。
    86.J. W. Gough, The Social Contract: A Critical Study of its Development(Second Edition), Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1957.
    87.J. W. Gough, Fundamental Law in English Constitutional History, Oxford University Press, 1954.
    88.David Boucher and Paul Kelly, The Social Contract from Hobbes to Rawls, Routledge, 1994.
    89.Daniel J.Elazar, Covenant & Polity in Biblical Israel, New Brunswick, 1995.
    90.Daniel J.Elazar, Covenant & Commonwealth, New Brunswick, 1996.
    91.Daniel J.Elazar, Covenant & Constitutionalism, New Brunswick, 1998.
    92.Daniel J.Elazar, Covenant and Civil Society, New Brunswick, 1998.
    93.Daniel J. Elazar, Kinship and Consent: the Jewish Political Tradition and Its Contemporary Uses. Transaction Publishers, 1997.
    94.Hugh Collins, Regulating Contracts, Oxford University Press Inc,1999.
    95.John Simmoms, Moral Principles and Political Obligation, Princeton University Press, 1979.
    96.Ron Replogle, Recovering the Social Contract, Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.1989.
    97.David Gauthier and Robert Sugden, Rationality, Justice and the Social Contract (Themes from Morals by Agreement), Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1993.
    98.David Gauthier, Morals By Agreement, Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1986.
    99.Anthony de Jasay, Social Contract, Free Ride: A study of the Public Goods Problem,Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1989.
    100.Jody S.Kraus, The Limits of Hobbesian Contractarianism, Cambridge University Press, 1993.
    101.Stephen Darwall, Contractarianism/ Contractualism, Blackwell Publishers Ltd,2003.
    102.Peter Vallentyne, Contractarianism and Rational Choice, Cambridge University Press,1991.
    103.Robert Staham,The Constitution of Public Philosophy: Toward a Synthesis of Freedom and Responsibility in Postmodern America, University Press of America, Inc, 1998.
    104.Werner Leinfellner, Game Theory, Experience,Rationality:Foudations of Social Sciences,Economics and Ethics(in honor of John C.Harsanyi),Kluwer Academic Publishers,1998.
    105、苏力:《从契约理论到社会契约理论——一种国家学说的知识考古学》,《中国社会科学》1996 年第3 期。
    106、马新福:《社会主义法治必须弘扬契约精神》,《中国法学》1995 年第1 期。
    107、崔卓兰、蔡立东:《从压制型行政模式到回应型行政模式》,《法学研究》2002年第4 期。
    108、霍存福等:《唐五代敦煌、吐鲁番买卖契约的法律与经济分析》,《法制与社会发展》1999 年第6 期。
    109、邱本:《契约总论》,《吉林大学社会科学学报》1995 年第4 期。
    110、俞江:《是“身份到契约”还是“身份契约”》,《读书》2002 年第5 期。
    111、俞江:《“契约”与“合同”之辨》,《中国社会科学》2003 年第6 期。
    112、江山:《广义综合契约论》,《民商法论丛》第6 卷,法律出版社1997 年版。