河西走廊荒漠化土地景观格局变化机理及荒漠化程度评价研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
根据1996年甘肃省河西走廊沙漠化普查资料、以及疏勒河流域中下游TM影像数据,运用景观生态学理论和方法,通过计算景观格局指数、各景观要素之间的转移矩阵、以及土地荒漠化综合值,对河西走廊荒漠化土地和疏勒河流域中下游的景观格局变化机理、以及河西走廊19个县(市、区)的荒漠化程度进行了初步分析和研究,结果如下:
     1.河西走廊荒漠化土地景观格局变化机理
     (1)景观多样性指数变化态势分析表明:整个河西走廊的景观多样性指数和均匀度指数均呈增加趋势,景观多样性指数从1949年的2.454增加到1995年的2.489,均匀度指数从0.685增加到0.694,说明该区的景观异质性在增大。不同流域五个时期的景观多样性指数与均匀度指数,以疏勒河流域最低,其最高值出现在1970年,分别为2.204和0.615;黑河流域最高,其最低值出现在1949年,分别为2.642和0.737,这说明黑河流域的景观异质性较疏勒河流域高。
     (2)景观分离度指数变化态势分析表明:从1949年到1995,特用地、耕地、林地等人工嵌块体的景观分离度在黑河流域和石羊河流域减小,在疏勒河流域增大。黑河流域分别减小了0.120、0.035和0.051,石羊河流域分别减小了157.800、0.350和0.270,疏勒河流域分别增加了0.005、0.260和0.029。流动沙地、半固定沙地、戈壁等半自然嵌块体的景观分离度在三个流域都呈减小趋势。分析表明:景观分离度与人类活动强度有较为密切而复杂的关系,主要表现在两个方面:1)与人类活动密切相关的景观类型,在人类活动较强的流域,景观分离度与人类活动强度成反相关。在人类活动较弱的流域,景观分离度与人类活动强度成正相关;2)对于那些受人类影响残留下的半自然景观类型,景观分离度和人类活动强度成反相关。
     (3)景观斑块破碎化指数变化态势分析表明:河西走廊、石羊河流域和黑河流域的景观斑块破碎化指数增加,1949年分别为0.0009、0.0037和0.0036,1995年分别为0.0024、0.0210和0.0065。景观斑块破碎化指数升高,说明上述三区的景观破碎化程度增加,这一结论与平均斑块面积分析结论相矛盾。在疏勒河流域,景观斑块破碎化指数减小,1949年为0.0023,1995年为0.0003,这表明景观破碎化程度减小。这一结论与平均斑块面积分析结论一致。因此,从
    
    该指数本身考虑,再结合其计算结果,可认为景观斑块破碎化指数所揭示的结
    果只能作为衡量一个区域景观破碎化程度的参考指标,而不能作为重要的或唯
    一的指标。
     2.疏勒河流域中下游景观格局变化机理
     1990、1994和 1999年,沙地、风蚀劣地和盐渍化土地面积之和占研究区
    总土地面积分别为57.lO、60.lO和63.6O。1990~1994年,低盖度直地向沙地
    转化的速率为 1300hln’h,灌木林地向高盖度草地和低盖度草地转化的速率分
    别为672ho’/。和908 ho’/。。1994-1999,高盖度草地和低盖度草地向耕地转化
    的速率分别为 1200hlnZ/a和 1558hln~a,向沙地转化的速率分别为 335 hxn勺a和
    113 hln书。分析表明:疏勒河流域中下游是以戈壁、荒漠、裸土和沙漠化土地
    构成的以荒漠为景观基质,以天然草甸与林灌植被、人工绿洲和水域等构成的
    绿洲为景观镶嵌体。其景观空间格局是干旱气候条件和人为活动叠加的产物,
    受气候波动和人为垦植灌耕等活动影响,景观动态变化范围大、格局各要素之
    间转化复杂。主要表现在:归)流域中上游人工绿洲的形成与发展常以流域下游
    天然绿洲大面积荒漠化为代价,如耕地面积的增加以草地转化为流动和半固定
    沙地为代价。()该流域的景观格局在向两个方向变化,而且这两个变化方向密
    切相关。一方面,在靠近水源和流域中上游地带,农耕发达,一般形成集约化、
    灌溉系统完善的农田景观;另一方面,在远离水源或流域下游地带,则随上游
    水资源利用程度的不断提高,天然生态体系破坏不断加剧,景观由高度破碎化
    的天然植被向荒漠化景观发展。
     3.土地荒漠化程度综合评价结果
     综合评价分析表明:在1995年,属于轻度荒漠化县(市、区)的有玉门市、
    山丹县、张掖市、肃南县、永昌县;属于中度荒漠化的有阿克塞县、肃北县、
    安西县、金昌市、酒泉市、金塔县、嘉峪关市,高台县、民乐县和临泽县;属
    于严重荒漠化的有敦煌市;属于极严重荒漠化的有武威市,民勤县和古浪县。
    从评价的结果可以看出,河西走廊除少数县(市、区)的荒漠化程度较轻外,
    大多数为中度、严重或极严重荒漠化区域,说明该区土地荒漠化形式十分严峻。
Based on the investigation material of sandy desertification land of Hexi corridor, Gansu province in 1996 and images of middle and lower reaches of Shule river basin, landscape pattern indices, transition matrix of patches and land desertification synthesis value were calculated. The variation mechanism of landscape pattern of desertification land in Hexi corridor and middle and lower reaches of Shule river basin and desertification degree of 19 counties, cities or regions in Hexi corridor were analyzed and discussed on the basis of landscape ecological theory and method. The results and conclusions are summarized up as follows:
    1. The variation mechanism of landscape pattern of desertification land in Hexi corridor
    (1) The variation trend of landscape diversity index shows that in Hexi corridor, landscape diversity index and evenness index increased in past 50 years. Landscape diversity index increased from 2.454 to 2.489 and evenness index increased from 0.685 to 0.694 from 1949 to 1995, which indicates that the landscape heterogeneity enhanced. Comparing landscape diversity index and evenness index of five periods in three basins, the minima were in Shule river basin whose maxims carne to 2.204 and 0.615 respectively in 1970, the maxims were in Hei river basin whose minima appeared 2.642 and 0.737 respectively in 1949, which indicates that the landscape heterogeneity in Hei river basin was higher than in Shule river basin.
    (2) The variation trend of landscape isolation index shows that the landscape isolation index of man-made landscape types such as special utilized land, farmland and forest land decreased in Hei river basin and Shiyang river basin from 1949 to 1995, which decreased 0.120, 0.035, 0.051 and 157.800, 0.350, 0.270 respectively. But in Shule river basin, which increased 0.005, 0.026 and 0.029 respectively. On the other hand, landscape isolation index of remained natural landscape types such as flowing sand dune, semi-flowing sand dune and gobi had a decreasing trend in three basins. Analysis results show that the relationship between landscape isolation index and human activity intensity is complex, which is reflected from two aspects:
    3
    
    
    
    (a) For those man-made landscape types, landscape isolation index shows an inverse relationship with human activity intensity in the basins effected intensively by human activity, shows a positive relationship in the basins impacted weakly by human activity, (b) For those remained natural types, the relationship between landscape isolation index and human activity is inverse.
    (3) The variation trend of landscape patch fragmentation index shows that in Shiyang river basin, Hei river basin and overall Hexi corridor, the landscape patch fragmentation index increased. In 1949, they were 0.0037, 0.0036 and 0.0009 respectively, and in 1995, the}' were 0.021, 0.0065 and 0.0024 respectively, which shows that the landscape patterns were fragmenting in those regions, this was contrary to the analysis results of mean patch area. But in Shule river basin, this index decreased, in 1949, it was 0.0023 and in 1995, it was 0.0003, which means that the landscape fragmentation degree descended, this coordinates with the results obtained from the mean patch area. Therefore, in order to measure landscape fragmentation degree, the landscape patch fragmentation index results should be taken as a reference index and not as a sole or major index.
    2. The variation mechanism of landscape pattern in middle and lower reaches of Shule river basin
    The area percentage of sandy land, wind eroded land and saline-alkali land to the total in 1990,1994 and 1999 were 57.1%, 60.1% and 63.6% respectively. The transition rate of grassland with low coverage to sandy desert was 1300hnr/a, shrub land to grassland with low and high coverage were 672hm2/a and 908hnr/a respectively in the period of 1990-1994. During the period of 1994-1999, the transition rates of grassland with low coverage and high coverage to farmland were 1200hnr/a and 1558hm2/a respectively, and to sandy land wer
引文
1.李哈滨.景观生态学——生态学领域的新概念构架.生态学进展.1988,5(1):23~33.
    2.肖笃宁.景观生态学的发展和应用.生态学杂志.1988,7(6):43~48.
    3.黄清麟.景观生态学与森林经理学.林业资源管理.1997,4:22~27.
    4.肖笃宁,布仁仓,李秀珍.生态空间理论与空间异质性.生态学报.1997,17(5):453~460.
    5.Kimberly A.With著.聂忆黄译.生物多样性保护的新课题:景观保护.见景观生态学论坛.湖南科学技术出版社.2000,82~85.
    6.陈利顶,傅伯杰.黄河三角洲地区人类活动对景观结构影响分析——以山东省东营市为例.生态学报.1996,16(4):337~343.
    7.曾辉,郭庆华,喻红.东莞市风岗镇景观人工改造活动的空间分析.生态学报.1999,19(3):587~593.
    8.岳德鹏,王冬梅,赵方莹等.北京市大兴县北藏乡景观格局及生态变化的研究.北京林业大学学报.1997,19(2):35~40.
    9. Vos W. Recent Landscape Transformation in the Tuscan Apennines Caused by Changing land Use. Landscape and Urban Planning. 1993.24(4): 63~68.
    10. Mladenoff D J. White M A, Pastor J. et al. Comparing Spatial Pattern in Unaltered Old Growth and Disturbed Forest Landscapes. Ecological Applications. 1993,3:294~306.
    11. Kotarba A. Landscape Ecology: Human Impact of the Polish Tarfa Mountains. Animal Biology . 1998,27(4): 354~357.
    12. Dooley J L. Bowers M A. Demographic Responses to Habitat Fragmentation: Experimental Tests at the Landscape and Patch Scale. Ecology. 1998,79:969~980.
    13. Pickett S T A. Cadenasso M L. Landscape Ecology Spatial Heterogeneity in Ecological Systems. Science. 1995, 269:331~334.
    14.Roy Haines-young著.马克明译.景观格局:背景与过程.见景观生态学论坛.湖南科学技术出版社.2000,37~41.
    15.肖寒,欧阳志云,赵景柱等.海南岛景观空间结构分析.生态学报.2001,21(1):20~26.
    16.宋凤兰.河西走廊绿洲生态系统及农业可持续发展.干旱区研究.1999,16(3):63~67.
    17.张志强.河西地区的生态建设与可持续农业发展战略对策.中国人口、资源与环境.2000,10(4):34~38.
    
    
    18.陈隆亨,曲耀光著.河西地区水土资源及其合理开发利用.北京:科学出版社.1992.
    19.裴相斌.从景观到景观生态.见肖笃宁主编.景观生态学:理论、方法及应用.北京:林业出版社.1991,92~98.
    20.邬建国.景观生态学——概念与理论.生态学杂志,2000,19(1):42~52.
    21.陈昌笃,崔海亭,于子成.景观生态学的由来和发展.见肖笃宁主编.景观生态学:理论、方法及应用.北京:林业出版社.1991,1~5.
    22.Richard.T.T.Forman.景观与区域生态学的一般原理.生态学杂志.1996,7(1):77~82.
    23.肖笃宁,李秀珍.当代景观生态学的进展与展望.地理科学.1997,17(4):356~363.
    24.肖笃宁.国际景观生态学研究的最新进展.生态学杂志.1999,18(6):75~76.
    25.王根绪,程国栋.荒漠绿洲生态系统的景观格局分析——景观空间方法与应用.干旱区研究.1999,16(3):6~11.
    26.景贵和.景观生态学.见马世骏主编.现代生态学透视.北京:科学出版社.1990,194~200.
    27.邱扬,张金屯,郑凤英.景观生态学的核心:生态系统的时空异质性.生态学杂志.2000,19(2):42~49.
    28.徐化成主编.《景观生态学》.北京:中国林业出版社.1996.
    29.景贵和.景观生态学的若干理论问题.见肖笃宁主编.景观生态学:理论、方法及应用.北京:林业出版社.1991,6~12.
    30.贾宝全,杨洁泉.景观生态学的起源与发展.干旱区研究.1999,16(3):12~17.
    31.贺红士.景观生态——一种综合整体思想的发展.应用生态学报.1990,1(3):264~269.
    32.陈昌笃.十年来我国的景观生态学和全球生态学.应用生态学报.1992,11(1):15~16.
    33.俞孔坚.论景观概念及其研究的发展.北京林业大学学报.1987,9(4):433~439.
    34. E.H.Helmer. The Landscape of Tropical Secondary Forest in Montane Costa Rica. Ecosystems. 2000,3:98~114.
    35. Jiquan Chen, Sari C.Saunders, Thomas R.Crow, Robert J.Naiman, Kimberley D. Brosofske, Glenn D.Mroz, Brian L.Brookshire, and Jerry F Franklin. Microclimate in Forest Ecosystem and Landscape Ecology. Bioscience. 1999,49(4):288~297.
    36. Dean Urban and Timo.thy Keitt. Landscape Connectivity: A Graph-Theoretic Perspective.Ecology.2001, 82(5): 1205~1218.
    
    
    37. Gustafson,E.J.,and R.H.Gardner. The Effect of Landscape Heterogeneity on the Probability of Patch Colonization.Ecology. 1996, 77:94~107.
    38. Shirish A. Ravan and P.S.Roy. Satellite Remote Sensing for Ecological Analysis of Forested Landscape. Plant Ecology. 1997,131: 129~141.
    39.黄锡畴.德意志联邦共和国生态环境的现状及其保护.地理科学.1981,2:98~104.
    40.刘安国.捷克斯洛伐克的景观生态研究.地理科学.1981,2:77~82.
    41.常学礼,邬建国.科尔沁沙地景观格局特征分析.生态学报.1998,18(3):225~232.
    42.贾宝全,慈龙骏,杨晓辉等.石子河莫索湾垦区绿洲景观格局变化分析.生态学报.2001,21(1):34~40.
    43.贾宝全,慈龙骏.绿洲景观生态规划研究.干旱区地理.1999,22(4):62~70.
    44.韩荡,王仰麟.区域持续农业的景观生态研究.干旱区地理.1999,22(3):1~7.
    45.王仰麟,赵一斌,韩荡.景观生态系统的空间结构:概念、指标与案例.地球科学进展.1999,14(3):235~241.
    46.布仁仓,王宪礼,肖笃宁.黄河三角洲景观组分判定与景观破碎化分析.应用生态学报.1999,10(3):321~324.
    47.王宪礼,肖笃宁,布仁仓等.辽河三角洲湿地的景观格局分析.生态学报.1997,17(3):317~323.
    48.王宪礼,布仁仓,胡远满等.辽河三角洲湿地景观破碎度分析.应用生态学报.1996,7(3):299~304.
    49.辛晓平,高琼,李宜根等.放牧和水淹干扰对松嫩平原碱化草地空间格局影响的分析.植物学报.1999,19(3):307~313.
    50.辛晓平,徐斌,单宝庆等.恢复演替中草地斑块动态及尺度转化分析.生态学报.2000,20(4):587~593.
    51.宗跃光.城市景观生态规划中的廊道效应研究.生态学报.1999,19(2):145~150.
    52.郭晋平,阳含熙,张云香等.关帝山林区景观要素空间分布及其动态研究.生态学报.1999,19(4):468~473.
    53.郭晋平,薛俊杰,李志强等.森林景观恢复过程中景观要素斑块规模的动态分析.生态学报.2000,20(2):218~223.
    
    
    54.郭晋平,张云香,薛俊杰.关帝山林区景观要素空间关联度与景观格局分析.林业科学.1999,35(4):28~33.
    55.郭晋平,阳含熙,王毅敏等.关帝山森林景观异质性及其动态.应用生态学报.1999,10(2):167~171.
    56.郭晋平,王俊田,李世光.关帝山林区景观要素沿环境梯度分布趋势的研究.植物生态学报.2000,24(2):135~140.
    57.甘肃年鉴.中国统计出版社.2000.
    58.西北地区水资源合理开发利用与生态环境保护研究的疏勒河流域水土资源合理开发利用与生态环境保护研究.甘肃省水利科学研究所.1999,11~14.
    59. Wang Genxu and Cheng Guodong. Water Resource Development and its Influence on the Environment in Arid Areas of China-the Case of the Hei River Basin. Journal of Arid Environments. 1999, 43:121~131.
    60.卢玲,李新,程国栋等.黑河流域景观结构分析.生态学报.2001,21(8):1217~1224.
    61.卢玲,程国栋,李新.黑河流域中游地区景观变化研究.应用生态学报.2001,12(1):68~74.
    62.甘肃省沙漠化普查与监测实施细则.甘肃省沙漠化普查与监测领导小组办公室.1994.
    63.甘肃省荒漠化监测技术操作细则.甘肃省荒漠化监测领导小组办公室.1998.
    64. D. Grant Hokit, Brandley M.Stith, and Lyn C.Branch. Effects of Landscape Structure in Florida Scrub: A Population Perspective. Ecological Applications. 1999,9(1): 124~134.
    65. John A, Ludwig, John A, Wiens, and David J.Tongway. A Scaling Rule for LandscapePatches and How It Applies to Conserving Soil Resources in Savannas. Ecosystems. 2000, 3: 84~97.
    66.王根绪,程国栋.干旱内陆河流域景观生态的空间格局分析.兰州大学学报.1987,9(4):433~439.
    67.吴波,慈龙骏.毛乌素沙地景观格局变化研究.生态学报.2001,21(1):20~26.
    68.傅伯杰.黄土区农业景观空间格局分析.生态学报.1995,15(2):113~120.
    69.孙中伟.试论景观的动态变化.生态学杂志.1995,14(4):58~62.
    70.胡春胜,林勇,王智平.渤海湾淤泥质海岸带典型地区景观空间格局分析.农村生态环境.2000,16(1):13~16.
    
    
    71.俞孔坚.生物保护的景观生态安全格局.生态学报.1999,19(1):8~15.
    72.傅伯杰,陈利顶.景观多样性的类型及其生态意义.地理学报.1996,51(5):454~462.
    73.李晓文,胡远满,肖笃宁.景观生态学与生物多样性保护.生态学报.1999,19(3):399~406.
    74. Margules, C.R.,G.A.Milkovitts, and G.T.Smith. Contrasting Effects of Habitat Fragmentation on the Scorpion Cercophonius Squama and an Amphipod. Ecology. 1994, 75:2033~2042.
    75. Diffendoffer. J.E., M.S.Gaines, and R.V.Holt. Habitat Fragmentation and Movement of Three Small Mammals (Sigmodon, Mocrotus, and Peromyscus). Ecology. 1995,76:827~839.
    76. Steven I. Higgins, David M. Richardson, Richard M. Cowling, and Terry H. Trinder-smith. Predicting the Landscape-Scale Distribution of Alien Plants and Their Threat to Plant Diversity. Conservation Biology. 1999,13(2):303~313.
    77. David Cameron Duffy, Keith Boggs, Randall H, Hagenstein, Robert Lipkin, and Julie A. Michaelson. Landscape Assessment of the Degree of Protection of Alaska's Terrestrial Biodiversity. Conservation Biology. 1999,13(6): 1332~1343.
    78. Enrique Reyes, Mary L.White, Jay F. Martin, G.Paul Kemp, John W. Day and Vibhas Aravamuthan. Landscape Modeling of Coastal Habitat Change in The Mississippi Delta. Ecology.2000,81 (8):2331~2349.
    79. David Hiebeler. Populations on Fragmented Landscapes with Spatially Structured Heterogeneities: Landscape Generation and Local Dispersal. Ecology.2000, 8(16):1629~1641.
    80.贾宝全,慈龙骏,杨晓晖等.人工绿洲潜在景观格局及其与现实格局的比较分析.应用生态学报.2000,11(6):912~916.
    81.刘灿然,陈灵芝.北京地区植被景观中斑块大小的分布特征.植物学报.1999,42(2):199~205.
    82.刘灿然,陈灵芝.北京地区植被景观斑块形状的分形分析.植物生态学报.2000,24(2):129~134.
    83.肖笃宁,赵羿,孙中伟等.沈阳西郊景观格局变化的研究.应用生态学报.1990,1(1):75~84.
    
    
    84.李锋,孙司衡.景观生态学在荒漠化监测与评价中应用的初步研究—以青海沙珠玉地区为例.生态学报.1996,16(4):337~343.
    85.李贞,王丽荣,管东生.广州城市绿地系统景观异质性分析.应用生态学报.2000,11(1):127~130.
    86.赵焕臣编.层次分析法——一种简易的新决策立法.北京:科学出版社.1986.
    87.陶玲,任珺,刘新民等.区域荒漠化综合评价体系的AHP模型设计与应用的研究.中国沙漠.1999,19(19):208~211.
    88.China Country Paper to Combat Desertification,China National Committee for the Implementation of the United Nations to Combat Desertification,China Forestry Publishing House,1997.
    89.张煜星.论荒漠与荒漠化程度评价.干旱区研究.1996,13(2):77~80.
    90.刘玉平.荒漠化评价的理论框架.干旱区资源与环境.1998,12(3):76~81.
    91.朱震达,陈广庭.中国土地沙质荒漠化.北京:科学出版社.1994.
    92.景贵和.我国东北地区某些荒芜土地的景观生态建设.地理学报.1991,46(1):8~15.
    93.肖笃宁,李晓文.试论景观规划的目标、任务和基本原则.生态学杂志.1998,17(3):46~52.
    94.程国栋,肖笃宁,王根绪.论干旱区景观生态特征与景观生态建设.地球科学进展.1999,14(1):11~15.