福建自选烤烟新品系综合性状评价
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
由于烤烟种植区域的地形地貌复杂,气象因子多变,使得烤烟品种的产量和品质在不同年份、不同地区间出现较大的波动性。研究不同烤烟品种的稳定性表现和烟草品种的综合评价,筛选不同地区适宜种植的优良品种,对于实现良种良法配套,充分发挥良种的增产增效潜力具有十分重要的意义,同时还有利于实现全省烤烟品种的区域化布局与合理搭配种植。
     本研究以福建省2007年烤烟品种区域试验为基础,对烤烟品种多环境试验进行了联合方差分析,研究了烤烟产量性状的稳定性,采用AMMI模型研究了烤烟内在品质性状的基因型与环境互作效应,采用灰色关联度分析法对各品系的表现对理想品种作关联度分析,并对各参试品种进行了综合评价。研究结果表明:
     (1)浦城点数据误差均方与其余五个试点差异大,多数经济性状的样本卡方值较大,样本方差不具同质性。其余五个试点产量、产值、上等烟比例、上中等烟比例、产指的方差具有同质性。
     (2)联合方差分析结果显示,各品种的产量、产值、上等烟比例、上中等烟比例和产指在地点间、品种间、品种×地点间均存在着显著或极显著的差异,采用Duncan's新复极差法分别对不同品种间、不同地点间的各效应差异进行了多重比较,明确了优良基因型经济性状的表现位次。F1-35、9804、FL86、C2各主要经济性状表现较好,其中F1-35产量及产值较高,9804上等烟比例、上中等烟比例较高,烟叶质量较好。F05各性状表现均较差。试点表现上看,三明点各主要经济性状均较好,其次为长汀点,龙岩点产量中等,其余经济性状表现较差。
     (3)对以上五个经济性状的稳定性进行了测定,明确了各品种的稳定性及其适应范围。品系F1-35经济性状丰产性好,稳定性中等;品系9804产量产值表现中等,上等烟比例和上中等烟比例最高,产值、上等烟比例稳定高;FL86的产值量较高,上等烟比例也较高,各经济性状稳定性较好;F05各主要经济性状丰产性表现较差,稳定性也较差。
     (4)基于AMMI模型分析了烟叶各化学成分及比例和烟叶评吸的基因型与环境互作效应,根据显著的交互作用主成分轴计算出Di,对各品种的稳定性大小进行了排序。化学成分上就还原糖而言,各基因型稳定性的排序是:C2<F1-35<F05<CB-1<B06-8<9804<FL86<B06-3;就总糖而言,各基因型稳定性的排序是:F1-35<C2<CB-1<FL86<F05<B06-8<B06-3<9804;就氮碱比而言,各基因型稳定性的排序是:FL86<F1-35<CB-1<9804<F05<B06-3<C2<B06-8;就总钾而言,各基因型稳定性的排序是:9804<CB-1<FL86<B06-8<C2<B06-3<F1-35<F05。评吸总分上基因与环境互作未有显著差异。
     (5)综合分析各品系表现结果:FL86、C2综合表现均较好;9804、F1-35表现中等;B06-8、F05、B06-3表现稍差。
     (6)应用灰色关联分析法分析了各参试材料与理想品种之间的关联度,所得分析结论与综合分析所得结论相近。
Due to the complexity of landforms and geographies of tobacco producing areas and also the diversity of climate factors there, the quality and the yield of flue-cured tobacco leaves produced in different areas and in different years with the same varieties could be fluctuated. So it is very important to research the performance for its stability of flue-cured tobacco varieties, screen the suitable and good varieties for different areas, in order to regionalize and optimize the flue-cured tobacco varieties in Yunnan and to actually achieve good quality and good yield the variety potentially could be.
     Based on regional trial of flue-cured tobacco varieties done in 2007, joint variance analysis on environment multi-factors affecting the performance of flue-cured tobacco variety has been done. The yield stability of a flue-cured tobacco variety was studied using Eberhart & Russell model, interaction of the genotype and the effect of environment affecting the internal quality of a flue-cured tobacco variety was studied using AMMI model, analysis the correlation between different strains and ideal Cultivar By correlation analysis of grey-system and comprehensively evaluated all the varieties involved in the trial. The results are as follows:
     (1)The mean square of error of data in PuCheng have Significant difference to other five locatins. Most economic traits showed bigger value of chi-square test and the variance of sample have no homogeneity of variance in PuCheng. There have homogeneity of variance of yield and value、ratio of high and mid-high grade leaves and output index in those five locations.
     (2) Joint variance analyzing results showed the yield and value、ratio of high and mid-high grade leaves and output index were in great significant differences with different location, it was also true between the varieties, and the variety x location, because the interaction between genotype and the environment is commonly existed, it is very important in flue-cured tobacco leaf production to study the stability of a variety. The Duncan's was used to multi-comparatively analyze the difference between the varieties and locations, and confirmed the order of performance in good genotype's economic traits.
     (3)The stability of 5 economic traits was tested by Eberhart and Russell regression model, and confirmed the stability and the adaptability scope of each variety. For Strain F1-35 The economic traits is high yield, and the stability is in middle degree; For Strain 9804 , the yield and value Per Mu is in middle degree, the ratio of high and mid-high grade leaves is highest, the stability of the yield and the ratio of high grade leaves is high; For Strain FL86, the yield and value is higher than others, the ratio of high grade leaves is also higher, it's economic traits is more stable; For Strain F05, the yield and stability of every economic traits is not so good.
     (4)Interaction between the reduced sugar, the Schmuck's value, the potassium, the chlorine and total score from smoking evaluation of the genotype and the environment was analyzed based on AMMI model; Di was calculated based on the main ingredient axle from significant interaction, the sequence was made according to the stability of the variety from the big to the small.
     (5)Comprehensive analysis of these Strains: The comprehensive performance of FL86 and C2 are best; the 9804 and F1-35 are second; The B06-8、F05 and B06-3 are last.
     (6)The result is nearly the same between the result of analysis and Comprehensive analysis, from analysis the correlation between different strains and ideal Cultivar By correlation analysis of grey-system .
     The study was based on the official variety tests of flue-cured tobacco done in the past several years in FuJian , the study results can be used for the evaluation of flue-cured tobacco variety test and the utilization of a variety reasonably, and provide the theory evidence for the distribution of the variety in tobacco producing areas. Compared with the studies done previously, this paper analyzed the economic indexes, the chemical components, and the smoking evaluation etc important traits, and the results obtained are more complete. The statistical analysis model or method for the variety regional test has been established gradually in this way, and it could be greatly helpful for the future tobacco variety official test, and to establish a statistical analyzing model system for this purpose, that will be very good to scientifically, objectively and comprehensively evaluate the testing material or variety, the evidence obtained will be very useful both by the breeder or by the tobacco variety evaluation commission.
引文
[1]Yates,F.Cochran W.G,The analysis of groups of experiments,J.of Agric.Sci.,1938,28:556-580
    [2]Finlay,K.W.,Wilkinson,G.N.,The analysis of adaptation in a plantbreeding programme,Aust.J.Agric.Res.,1963,14:742-754
    [3]Eberhart,S.A.,Russell,W.A.,Stability parameters for comparing varieties,Crop Sci.,1966,6:36-40
    [4]Perkins,J.M.Jinks,J.L.,Environmental and genotype-environmental components of variability,Heredity,1968,23:523-535
    [5]Freeman,G.H.,Perkins,J.M.,Environmental and genotype-environmental components of variability,Ⅷ.Relations between genotypes grown in different environments and measures of these environments,Heredity,1971,26:15-23
    [6]Freeman,G.H.,Statistical methods for the analysis of genotype-environment interactio ns,Heredity,1973,31:339-354
    [7]Tai,G.C.C.,Genotypic stability analysis and its application to potato regional trials,Crop Sci.,1971,11:184-180
    [8]张能义,薛庆中,用AMMI模型分析基因型与环境互作对水稻光敏核不育花培系育性的影响,生物数学学报,1998,13(6):1028-1034
    [9]张泽,鲁成,向仲怀,基于AMMI模型的家蚕品种稳定性分析,中国农业科学,1998,31(1):62-68
    [10]张泽,鲁成,向仲怀,基于AMMI模型的品种稳定性分析,作物学报,1998,24(3):304-309
    [11]杨铁钊,七个烤烟品种产质的稳定性分析,中国烟草,1988,(2):41-46
    [12]王元英,冯全福等,烤烟品种产量、质量稳定性分析,中国烟草,1990,(1):14-19
    [13]宋梅,陈学平,烤烟新品种产量、质量稳定性分析,中国烟草,1992,(1):12-17
    [14]李国民,肖汉乾,方红,田峰,烤烟品种主要经济性状的稳定性分析,中国烟草学报,2001,7(1):13-17
    [15]谢小丹;陈顺辉;巫升鑫,等.烤烟新引品种的模糊综合评判和灰色关联度分析,福建农林大学学报,2002,(6)
    [16]张谊寒,卢秀萍,白永富,等.灰色关联度分析和模糊综合评判在烤烟引种试验上的 应用研究初判[A].烟草农业科学,2007,(4)
    [17]孙焕,侯咏,段旺军等.灰色关联分析法在烤烟品种综合评估中的应用,河南农业科学,2007,(2):38-40
    [18]郭瑞林.作物灰色育种学[M].北京:中国农业出版社,1995:25-51.
    [19]刘录祥.灰色系统理论应用于作物新品种综合评估初探[J].中国农业科学,1989,22(3)22-27.
    [20]杨涛,杨超明.灰色关联度分析在小麦品种综合评估中的应用[J].新疆农业科学,2001,38(6):306-308.
    [21]林先明.模糊综合评判在审定小麦品种中的应用[J].湖北农业科学,1986,(1):13-17.
    [22]刘录祥,孙其信,王士芸.灰色系统理论应用于作物新品种综合评估初探[J].中国农业科学,1989,22(3):22-27.
    [23]安有国,李俊朋,王素华.模糊综合评判方法在品种审定中的应用[J].种子科技,2000,(3):166-167.
    [24]温兆麟.模糊数学在综合评价水稻栽培方式中的应用[J].广西农业大学学报,1998,17(4):360-364.
    [25]解艳华.模糊综合评判和灰色关联度分析对晒烟新品种评估效果[J].中国烟草科学,2000,(1):16-19.
    [26]戴培刚,蒋予恩,王志德,等.美国烤烟引种试验(第二批)简报[J].中国烟草科学,2001,(2):1-4.
    [26]胡建军,马明,李耀光等.烟叶主要化学指标与其感官质量的灰色关联分析[A].烟草科技,2001,(1):3-7
    [27]基于AMMI模型评价烤烟品种品质性状的稳定性[J].云南农业大学学报2003,18(1):81-85.
    [27]沈继红,施久玉.数学建模[M].哈尔滨:哈尔滨工程大学出版社,1998:215-226.
    [28]赵德齐.模糊数学[M].北京:中央民族大学出版社,1995:173-189.
    [29]罗登山,宗永立,王兵等.贵州、湖南、河南、山东1995年烤烟(40级)分析及质量评价[J].烟草科技,1997,(3):10-13.
    [30]闫克玉,李兴波,张中义等.烤烟(40级)各等级烟叶主要理化指标分析报告[J].烟草科技,1994,(4):2-5.
    [31]强爱玲,安永平.AMMI模型在水稻品种区域试验中的应用[A].吉林农业科学2007,32(1):5-711
    [32]王磊,杨仕华,谢芙贤等.AMMI模型及其在作物区试数据分析中的应用.应用基础与工程科学学报J,1997,(3):39-46.
    [33]许健,杨德,李忠任等.烟草品系试验稳定性研究.中国农学通报[J],2008(4):207-210
    [34]胡秉民,耿旭.作物稳定性分析法[M].北京:科学出版社,1993:23-24.
    [35]刘旭云,谢永俊,杨德,等.AMMI模型用于油菜区域试验的分析研究[J].西南农业学报,2001,14(2):27-30.
    [36]张艳,何中虎,王磊,等.利用主效可加互作可乘模型对我国冬播麦区小麦蛋白质含量基因型与环境互作的分析[J].华北农学报,2000,15(增刊):31-35.
    [37]阎俊,何中虎.基因型、环境及其互作对黄淮麦区小麦淀粉品质性状的影响[J].麦类作物学报,2001,21(2):14-19.
    [38]郭银燕,何廷.品种区域试验中基因型与环境互作效应分析[J].1995,10(4):56-60.
    [39]周金先.云南烟草品种区域试验研究[J].云南农业大学学报,2004,19(1):78-85.
    [40]王磊,杨仕华,沈希宏等.作物品种区试数据分析的主效可加互作可乘模型(AMMI)图形[J].南京农业大学学报,1998,21(2):18-23
    [41]王磊,杨仕华.利用双标图分析作物区试数据[J].生物数学学报,1997,12(5):557-562.
    [42]张泽,鲁成,向仲怀.基于AMMI模型的家蚕品种稳定性分析[J].中国农业科学,1998,31(1):62-68.
    [43]曾献英.AMMI模型在棉花区域试验中的应用[J].棉花学报,2004,16(4):233-235
    [44]张泽,鲁成,向仲怀,基于AMMI模型的品种稳定性分析[J],作物学报,1998,24(3):304-309
    [45]杨铁钊,七个烤烟品种产质的稳定性分析[J],中国烟草,1988,(2):41-46
    [46]王元英,冯全福等,烤烟品种产量、质量稳定性分析[J],中国烟草,1990,(1):14-19
    [47]宋梅,陈学平,烤烟新品种产量、质量稳定性分析[J],中国烟草,1992,(1):12-17
    [48]李国民,肖汉乾,方红,田峰,烤烟品种主要经济性状的稳定性分析[J],中国烟草学报,2001,7(1):13-17
    [49]朱军,赖鸣冈,许馥华,作物品种区域试验非平衡资料的分析方法:Ⅱ.综合性状的分析[J],浙江农业大学学报,1994,19(3):241-247
    [50]朱军,许馥华,赖鸣冈,作物品种区域试验非平衡资料的分析方法:Ⅰ.单一性状的分析[J],浙江农业大学学报,1993,(1):7-13