醋酸奥曲肽微球工艺优化及其验证
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
本研究针对目前缓控释制剂中存在的载药量低、突释现象严重的问题,将微球传统制备方法复乳-溶剂挥发法进行了优化,采用旋转蒸发法制备高浓度内水相。优化后的方法具有较高的载药量和较低的突释。在工艺优化过程中兼顾载药量、突释、收率、粒径等关键质量控制点,并对影响质量控制点的因素进行细致的分析和讨论。工艺过程及参数确定后,进行了系统的工艺验证及无菌验证,并将优化的制备工艺放大到生产规模,在GMP条件下进行生产。此后,对制备的微球进行表征,建立了多种适用于微球的检测方法,并参照2010年版《中国药典》对微球进行质量研究。质量研究内容包括:微球无菌检测和稳定性试验。在药物释放研究中,通过体内药代动力学研究,摸索出体外长期和加速释放方法,建立了体内外相关性,长期释放方法可以对体内释放进行模拟和预测;加速释放方法便于快速筛选制剂处方和成品检验。
     本研究创新点:1、将传统的复乳-溶剂挥发法进行了优化,采用旋转蒸发法制备高浓度内水相,内水相浓度达到2.5g/ml;2、首次获得高载药量(11.2%)、低突释(8.6%)的醋酸奥曲肽微球;3、设计了一套适用于缓释制剂的生产线,并进行了验证;4、建立了加速释放方法,能够预测长期体外释放,极大的缩短了微球的释放检测周期。
Octreotide (OT) is a kind of artificial growth hormone release inhibitinghormone with eight peptides. It can bring about biological effects by connecting withacceptors of central nervous system, hypophysis and abdominal salivary gland cell.Because of its short half-value period, retaining long-term plasma drug level requiresmany injection-times every day. Common preparations will easily occur wave-crestand wave-trough phenomenons. So sustained release dosage forms will make theadministration more convenience.
     Sustained release dosage forms’ preparations were researched several years. Thedouble emulsion solvent-evolution method is developed and deeply researched. Itneeds the loaded-drug with a high water-solubility and stability. These may match thecharactors of Octreotide acetate (OTA). So, in this paper, the double emulsionsolvent-evolution method was employed to prepare OTA loaded-microspheres and anoptimized method (W1/O/W2) was created. The obvious difference between the twomethods was the preparation of W1. Using a rotary evaporation method instead oftraditional dissolve method can lead to a series of adventages, such as: the degradationof OTA was decreased; the viscosity was increased and the homogeneity of drugbecame better, so the burst release was decreased and the safty of drug was increased.After the microspheres were obtained, the morphologic was studied by microscope.We found that the surface of the microspheres were smooth without pore anddispersed well. At the same time, the course of flat-sphere phenomenon wasdiscovered: during the freeze drying procession, the temperature increased too fastwill lead to the PLGA skeleton’s retracted delayed and shaped pores inside themicrospheres. Then falt spheres were formed under the vacuum condition. Furthermore, this study investigated the influence of double-emulsion procession parametersto the key quality points of microspheres, such as: the particle size, drug loadingcapacity, recovery rate and release amount. The results indicated that: the particle size decreased with the concentration of W2increased. And with the CH2Cl2disappearedand the solidity of the microspheres, the particle size of microspheres was alsodecreased.
     In order to ensure the process environment is sterile, after the preparation processwas determined, a series of process qualifications were carried out. Before the regularpreparetion of microspheres, an aseptic production was simulated by using mannitolinstead of the raw meterials and excipients. This paper, we used a conviction ofprocess control. The workshop was under the condition of GMP and the wholeprecess was under the close and sterile situation. The raw materials and excipientswere moist heat sterilized. OTA and PLGA were aseptic filtrated. The instrumentswere sterilized online and the intermediates and finished products were all detected.
     For sustained release dosage forms, the release amount is an important charactor.The drug release will concentrated on the first day of the release course and this burstrelease may raise the challenges of the drug’s safety. The mechanism is dispersing. Sothe research on burst release is very necessary. Through the release test, we foundedthat the burst release occurs during the first6h mainly. Meanwhile, we alsodiscovered that: the molecular weight of PLGA, the volatilize speed of CH2Cl2, thevolume of W1, the PVA concentration of W2, the particle size, washing-time of burstrelease and the pH value of the buffer will affect the burst release profiles of themicrospheres. Moreover, the in vivo release test was carried out using beagle dogsthrough one-dosing and multiple-dosing. The results indicated that: the bioavailabilityof microspheres made by the optimized method was98%and their action equaled toSandostatin. At the aspect of release determination, this paper founded an acceleratedmethod to evaluate the release profiles of microspheres. Firstly, according to thedurg-time curve of in vivo one-dosing, the in vivo release amount was calculated bythe Wagner-Nelson method. Secondly, a long-term release model was founded inorder to match the in vivo release profiles, so the correlation between in vivo and invitro relwas founded (r=0.9876). Finally, an accelerated release method was founded,and the release profiles correlated well with the long-term release obtained by thepaddle method (r=0.9540). Therefore, by the optimization of release conditions, an accelerated release method could be founded to evaluate release profiles from PLGAmicrospheres.
     At the aspect of microspheres’ quality controlling, according to CHP, thedetective items are: microspheres’ shape, sterile detection, endotoxin detection,degradation products, moisture, residual solvent and the molecure mass of PLGA. Inthis study, the sterile detection method and degradation products were researcheddeeply. Other items were defined in CHP, so the research were not carried out. In thisstudy, the sterile detection and degradation products were researched deeply. Forsterile detection, the microspheres were dissolved by the solvent and filtered bymembrane filter method. The microbe will remained at the surface of the filtermembrane. For the comparative study of degradation products, the sandostatin wasused as the reference drug. Deduced the structures of degradation products accordingto the meterials’ chemical charactors, then synthesised the impurity to carry out masschromatographic analysis. The results indicated that the degradation products ofmicrospheres made by the optimized method were less than that of sandostatin.
     In order to ensure that the detection methods could describe the production’squality truly and reliably, according to ICH and CHP, the analytical methodvalidations were carried out in specificity, degree of accuracy, reproducibility,precision, durability and linear. The results indicated that: the detection methods couldmeet the needs of controling the production’s quality. In order to determine thedeposit condition of the microspheres, the stability was studied. The targets were: theamount of OTA, degradation products and release amount. The conditions wereaccelerating experimentation and long-term experimentation under deposit condition.It contains influencing factors detection, such as: high temperature, high moist,illumination, oxidation. The stability study results indicated that: theOTA-microspheres could be stored for12months at2-8℃,the relative humidity of10±3%. The microspheres were sensitive to temperature and water, so should bestored at a low temperature and drying condition.
引文
[1] Brazeau P., Vale W., Burgus R., et al. Hypothalarnic polypeptide that inhibits thesecretio of immunoreactive growth hormone [J]. Science,1973,179:77-79.
    [2] Reubi J.C., Kvols L., Krenning E., et al. Distribution of somatostatin receptors innormal and tumor tissue. Metabolism,1990,39(Suppl2):78-81.
    [3] Lamberts SWJ, Lely A. V. Herder W.W., et al. Octreotide. N Engl J Med,1996,334:246-253.
    [4]周亚魁,洪淑芳.奥曲肽在普外科的临床应用及其进展[J].中华肝胆外科杂志,2000,6(4):306-309.
    [5] Paran H., Neufeld D., Kaplan O., et al. Octreotide for treatment of postoperativealimentary tract fistulas. World J Surg,1995,19:430-433.
    [6] Von de Ohe MR, Camilleri M., Thomforde G.M., et al. Differential regionaleffects of octreotide on human gastrointestinal motor function. Gut,1995,36:743-748.
    [7] Thompson C.S., O’Dorisio T.M., Woltering E.A., et al. Calcium reversesoctreotide inhibition of insulin and glucagon levels in patients with insulinomaand glucagonoma. Digestion,1996,57(Suppl1):62-68.
    [8] Lim S.T., Forbes B., Berry D.J., et al. In vivo evaluation of novelhyaluronan/chitosan microparticulate defivery systems for the nasal delivery ofgentamicin in rabbits [J]. Int J Pharm,2002,231:73-82.
    [9] Julia S., Uwe G., Roger T., et al. Controlled release of gentamicin from calciumphosphate-poly (1actic acid-co-glycolic acid) composite bone cement[J].Biomaterials,2006,27:4239-4249.
    [10]Assad M., Chernyshov A., Leroux M. A., et al. A new porous titanium-nickelalloy:part sensitization,irritation and acute systemic toxicity evaluation [J].Biomed Mater Eng,2002,12(4):339-346.
    [11]Garric X., Moles J.P., Garreau H., et al. Growth of various cell types in thepresence of lactic and glycolic acids: the adverse effect of glycolic acid releasedfrom PLAGA copolymer on keratinocyte proliferation [J]. J Biomater Sci PolymEd,2002,13(11):1189-1201.
    [12]Zhang S. J., Pei Q. G., Pan K. F., et al. Study on Bio-compatibility of PLGA/HAin vivo [J]. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery.2007,17(1):40-45
    [13]Unger E. C., Thomas P., William C., et al. Therapeutic applications oflipid c oated microbubbles [J]. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews,2004,56(9):1291.
    [14]Sinha V. R., Aman T.. Biodegradable microspheres for protein delivery [J]. JControlled Release,2003,90(3):261-280.
    [15]De Wolf H K, Luten J., Snel C. J., et al. In vivo tumor transfection mediated bypolyplexes based on biodegradable poly(DMAEA)-phosphazene [J]. J ControlledRelease,2005,109(1-3):275-287.
    [16]Tinsley-Bown A. M., Fretwell R., Dowsett A. B., et al. Formulation of poly(D,L-lactic-co-glycolic acid)microparticles for rapid plasmid DNAdelivery [J].J Controlled Release,2000,66(2-3):229-241.
    [17]Ciombor D. M., Jaklenec A., Liu A. Z., et al. Encapsulati on of BSA using amodified W/O/O emulsion solvent removal method [J]. J Microencapsul,2006,23(3):183-194.
    [18]Du L., Cheng J., Chi Q., et al. Biodegradable PLGA micro-spheres as a sustainedrelease system for a new luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH)antagon.ist [J]. Chem Pharm Bull,2006,54(9):1259-1265
    [19]Hua S., Xu X. Y., Zhou J. P.. Influence factors on preparation of protein drugsloaded PLGA microspheres by double emulsionmethod: A Review[J]. P rogress inPharmaceutical Sciences,2009,33(10):451-457.
    [20]Gao P., Ding P., Xu H., et al. In vitro and in vivo characterization of huperzine aloaded microspheres made from end-group uncapped poly (D,L-lactide acid) andpoly(D,L-lactide-co-glycolide acid)[J]. Chem Pharm Bull,2006,54(1):89-93.
    [21]Andrieu-Soler C, Aubert-Pouessel A, Doat M., et al. Intravitreous injection ofPLGA microspheres encapsulating gdnf promotes the survival of photoreceptorsin the rd1/rd1mouse[J]. Mol Vis,2005,11:1002-1011.
    [22]Genentech patient information letter, June2004. http://www. nutropin. com/patient/19nutropin depot. jsp.
    [23]Bai J., He Y.. Application of Spray Drying Technique to Preparation ofProtein-and Peptide-Ioaded Microspheres: a Review [J]. Progress inPharmaceutical Sciences,2007,31(7):298-302.
    [24]Gavini E., Chetoni P., Cossu M., et al. PLGA microspheres for the ocular deliveryof a peptide drug, vancomycin using emulsification/spray-drying as thepreparation method: in vitro/in vivostudies [J]. Eur J Pharm Biopharm,2004,57(2):207-212.
    [25]Laneo-Pryeto M. J., Campanero M.A., Be K., et a1. Importance of single orblended polymer types for controlled in vitro release and plasma levels of asomatostatin analogue entrapped in PLM-PLGA mierospheres [J].J ControlledRelease,2004,96(3):437-448.
    [26]Quaqlia F., Rosa G. D., Granata E., et al. Feeding liquid, non-ionic sufactant andcyclodextrin affect the properties of insulin-loaded poly (1actide-co-glycolide)microspheres prepared by spray-drying[J]. J Controlled Reease,2003,86(2-3):267-278.
    [27]De Rosa G., Larobina D., Immacolata La Rotonda M., et a1. How eyclodextrinincorporation affects the properties of protein-loaded PLGA-based mierospheres:the case of insulinhydroxypropyl-B-cyclodextrin system [J]. J Controlled Release,2005,102(1):71-83.
    [28]Gavini E., Chetoni P., Cossu M, et a1. PLGA microspheres for the ocular deliveryof a peptide drug, vancomycin using emulsification/spray-drying as thepreparation method: in vitro/in vivo studies. J Eur pharm and biopharm,2004,57(2):207-212.
    [29]Lane M. E., Brerman F. S., Corrigan O.I.. Influence of post emulsification dryingprocesses on the microencapsulation of human serum albumin [J]. J Pharm,2006,307(1):16-22.
    [30]Maa Y. F., Nguyen P. A., Sweeney T, et a1. Protein inhalation powders: sprayacing vs spray freeze acres [J]. Pharm Res,1999,16(2):249-254.
    [31]Costanfino H.R., Firouzabadian L., Hogeland K, et a1. Protein spray-freeze doing.Effect of atomization conditions on particle size and stahility[J]. Pharrn Res,2000,17(11):1374-1383.
    [32]Stantino H.R., Firouzabadian L., Wu C.C., et a1. Protein spray freeze drying.2.Effect of formulation variables on particle size and stability [J], Pharm Sci,2002,91(2):388-395.
    [33]Webb S. D., Colledge S. T., Cleland J. L., et a1. Surface adsorption ofrecombinant human interferon-7in lyophilized and spmy-lyophilizedformulations [J]. J Pharm,2002,91(6):1474-1487.
    [34]Hu J. H., Johnston K.P., Williams R. O.. Nanoparticle engineering processes forenhancing the dissolution rates of poorly water solubled [J]. Drug Dev Ind Pharm,2004,30(3):233-245.
    [35]Hu J. H., Rogers T. L., Brown J., et al. Improvement of dissolution rates of poorlywater soluble APIs using novel spray freezing into liquid technology [J]. PharmRes,2002,19(9):1278-1284.
    [36]Rogers T. L., Hu J. H., Yu Z. S., et al. A novel particle engineering technology:spray-feezing into liquid [J]. J Phann,2002,242(1-2):93-100.
    [37]Rogers T. L., Nelzen A.C., FIu J. H., et a1. A novel particle engineeringtechnology to enhance dissolution of poorly water soluble dill: spray-freezing intoliquid [J].2002,54(3):271-280.
    [38]Yu Z. S., Garcia A. S., Johnston K. P., et al. Spray into liquid nitrogen for highlystable protein nanostructurod microparticles [J]. Eur J Pharm,2004,58(3):529-537.
    [39]Yu Z.S., Resers T. L., Hu J. H., et a1. Preparation and characterization ofmicroparticles containing peptide produced by a novel process: spray into liquid[J].Eur J Pharm Biopharm,2002,54(2):221-228.
    [40]Leach W. T., Simpson D. T., Val T. N., et a1. Uniform encapsulation of stableprotein nanoparticles by spray freezing for the reduction of burst release [J]. JPharmSci,2005,94(1):56-69.
    [41]Tian R., Wang L. Y., Wu J., et al. Preparation of Uniform Size PLGAMicroparticles and Microcapsules by Premix Membrane Emulsification [J]. TheChinese Journal of Process Engineering,2009,9(4):754-762.
    [42]Kumar N., Ravikumar M.N., Domb A.J.. Biodegradable Block Copolymers [J].Adv. Drug De1. Rev.,2001,53(1):23-44.
    [43]Ma G.H., Chen A., Su Z.G.. Preparation of Uniform Hollow Polystyrene Particleswith Large Voids by a Glass Membrane Emulsificaiton Technique and aSubsequent Suspension Polymerizaiton [J]. J. Appl. Polymer. Sci.,2003,87(2):244-251.
    [44]Ma G.H., Sone H., Omi S., Preparation of Uniform-sized Polystyrene-Polyacrylamide Composite Microspheres from a W/O/W Emulsion by Membrane Emulsiifcaton Techniques and Subsequent Suspension Polymeirzation[J]. Macromolecules,2004,37(8):2954-2964.
    [45]Zhou Q. Z., Wang L., Ma G. H., et a1. Prpearaiton of Uniform-sized AgraoseBeads by Microporous Membrane Emulsificaiton Technique [J]. J. ColloidsInterface Sci.,2007,311(1):118-127.
    [46]Liu R., Ma G. H., Meng F.. Preperation of Uniform-sized PLA Microcapsules byCombining Shirasu Porous Glass (SPG) Membrane Emulsificaiton Technique andMultiple Emulsion-solvent Evaporation Method [J]. J. Controlled Release,2005,103(1):31-43.
    [47]Liu R., Ma G.H., Wen Y.H., et a1. Influence of Process Parameterson the SizeDistribuiton of PLA Microcapsulesr prepeared by Combining MembraneEmulsification Technique and Double Emulsion-solvent Evaporation Method [J]Colloids Surf. B: Biointerfaces,2005,45(3-4):144-153.
    [48]Wang L., Ma G.H., Su Z.G.. Preparation of Uniform Sized Chitosan Microspheresby Membrane Emulsificaiton Tecnhique and Application as a Carder of ProteinDrug. J. Conrtolled Relesae,2005,106(1-2):62-75.
    [49]Wu J., Wei W.L, et a1. Preparation of Uniform-sized pH-sensitive QuatemizedChitosan Microspheres by Combining Membrane Emulsification Technique andThemral gelation Method [J]. Colloids Surf. B,2008,63(2):164-175.
    [50]Uhrich K. E., Cannizzaro S. M., Langer R. S..Polmyeric Systems of ConrtolledDrug Release [J]. Chem. Rev.,1999,99(11):3181-3198.
    [51]Costantino H.R., Johnson O.L., Zale S.E.. Relationship between encapsulate drugparticle size and initial release of recombinant human growth hormone frombiodegradable microspheres, J. Pharm. Sci.2004,93(10):2624-2634.
    [52]Cohen S., Yoshioka T., Lucarelli M., et al. Controlled delivery systems forproteins based on poly (lactic/glycolic acid) microspheres, Pharm.Res,1991,8(6):713-720.
    [53]Johnson O.L., Tracy M.A., in: E. Mathiowitz (Ed.), Encyclopedia of ControlledDrug Delivery, Vol.2, John Wiley and Sons, New Jersey,1999, pp.816-832.
    [54]Leach W.T., Simpson D.T., Val T.N., et al. Uniform encapsulation of stableprotein nanoparticles produced by spray freezing for the reduction of burst release,J. Pharm. Sci2005,94(1):56–69.
    [55]Jain R.A.. The manufacturing techniques of various drug loaded biodegradablepoly (lactide-co-glycolide)(PLGA) devices, Biomaterials2000,21(23):2475-2490.
    [56]Liu R., Ma G.H., Wan Y.H., Su Z.G.. Influence of process parameters on the sizedistribution of PLA microcapsules prepared by combining membraneemulsification technique and double emulsion-solvent evaporation method,Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces2005,45(3-4):144-153.
    [57]Liu R., Huang S.S., Wan Y.H., Ma G.H., Su Z.G., Preparation of insulin-loadedPLA/PLGA microcapsules by a novel membrane emulsification method and itsrelease in vitro, Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces2006,51(1):30-38.
    [58]Ye M. L., Kim S., Park K.. Issues in long-term protein delivery usingbiodegradable microparticles. Journal of controlled release,2010,146:241-260.
    [59]Bouissou C., Rouse J.J., Price R.. The influence of surfactant on PLGAmicrosphere glass transition and water sorption: remodeling the surfacemorphology to attenuate the burst release, Pharm. Res2006,23(6):1295–1305.
    [60]Chung T.W., Tsai Y.L., Hsieh J.H.. Different ratios of lactide and glycolide inPLGA affect the surface property and protein delivery characteristics of thePLGA microspheres with hydrophobic additives, J. Microencapsul2006,23(1):15–27.
    [61]Wei G., Pettway G.J., McCauley L.K.. The release profiles and bioactivity ofparathyroid hormone from poly (lactic-co-glycolic acid) microspheres,Biomaterials2004,25(2):345–352.
    [62]Igartua M., Hernandez R.M., Esquisabel A.. Influence of formulation variables onthe in-vitro release of albumin from biodegradable microparticulate systems,J.Microencapsul1997,14(3):349–356.
    [63]Ye M.L., Kim S., Park K.. Issues in long-term protein delivery usingbiodegradable microparticles. Journal of Controlled Release,2010,146:241-260.
    [64]Herrmann J.B.. The effect of particle microstructure on the somatostatin releasefrom poly (lactide) microspheres prepared by a W/O/W solvent evaporationmethod, J. Controlled Release1995,36(1-2):63-71.
    [65]Brunner A., Mader K., Gopferich A.. pH and osmotic pressure insidebiodegradable microspheres during erosion. Pharm. Res1999,16(6):847-853.
    [66]Jaganathan K.S., Rao Y.U., Singh P., et al. Development of a single dose tetanustoxoid formulation based on polymeric microspheres: a comparative study ofpoly (D,L-lactic-co-glycolic acid) versus chitosan microspheres. Int. J. Pharm2005,294(1-2):23-32.
    [67]Chung T.W., Tsai Y.L., Hsieh J.H., et al. Different ratios of lactide and glycolidein PLGA affect the surface property and protein delivery characteristics of thePLGA microspheres with hydrophobic additives. J. Microencapsul.2006,23(1):15-27.
    [68]Cohen S., Yoshioka T., Lucarelli M., Hwang L.H., Langer R., Controlled deliverysystems for proteins based on poly (lactic/glycolic acid) microspheres, Pharm.Res,1991,8(6):713-720.
    [69]Johnson O.L., Tracy M.A., in: E. Mathiowitz (Ed.), Encyclopedia of ControlledDrug Delivery, Vol.2, John Wiley and Sons, New Jersey,1999, pp.816-832.
    [70]Leach W.T., Simpson D.T., Val T.N., Anuta E.C., Yu Z., Williams R.O., JohnstonK.P., Uniform encapsulation of stable protein nanoparticles produced by sprayfreezing for the reduction of burst release, J. Pharm. Sci2005,94(1):56–69.
    [71]Jain R.A., The manufacturing techniques of various drug loaded biodegradablepoly (lactide-co-glycolide)(PLGA) devices, Biomaterials2000,21(23):2475-2490.
    [72]Liu R., Ma G.H., Wan Y.H., Su Z.G., Influence of process parameters on the sizedistribution of PLA microcapsules prepared by combining membraneemulsification technique and double emulsion-solvent evaporation method,Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces2005,45(3-4):144-153.
    [73]Liu R., Huang S.S., Wan Y.H., et al. Preparation of insulin-loaded PLA/PLGAmicrocapsules by a novel membrane emulsification method and its release invitro, Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces2006,51(1):30-38.
    [74]Physicianp S. Desk Ref erence49th. Medical Economics,1997:2564-2638.
    [75]Castellanos L., Canasquilo K. G.. Encapsulation of bovine serum albumin inpoly (lactic-co-glycolic) microspheres by the solid-in oil-in-water technique[J]. JPharm Pharmacal,2001,53(2):167-179.
    [76]Morita T., Sakamum Y., Horikiri Y., et al. Protein encapsulation intobiodegradable microspheres by a novel S/O/W emulsion method using poly(ethylene glycol) as a protein micronization adjuvant [J]. J Controlled Release,2000,69(3):435-448.
    [77] Dean S.. AllisonAnalysis of initial burst in PLGA microparticles Expert Opin.Drug Deliv.2008,5(6):615-628.
    [78]Arifin D.Y., Lee L.Y., Wang C.H.. Mathematical modeling and simulation of drugrelease from microspheres: Implications to drug delivery systems. Adv Drug DelRev2006,58:1274-1279.
    [79]Halley B.A., Jacob T.A., Lu AYH. The environmental impact of the use ofivermectin: environmental effects and fate. Chemosphere1989,18:1543-1563.
    [80]Clark S.L., Crowley A.J., Schmidt P.G., et al. Long-term delivery of ivermectin byuse of poly (D,L-lactic-co-glycolic) acid microparticles in dogs. Am J Vet Res.2004,65:752-757.
    [81]Batycky R.P., Hanes J., Langer R., et al. A theoretical model of erosion andmacromolecular drug release from biodegrading microspheres. J Pharm Sci.1997,86:1464-1477.
    [82]Budd PM, McKeown NB, Fritsch D. Free volume and intrinsic microporosity inpolymers. J Mater Chem.2005,15:1977-1986.
    [83]Naught A.D., Wilkinson A, editors. Compendium of chemical terminology.2ndedition. Boston: Blackwell Science Ltd.1997.
    [84]Saowanee J., Sompol P., Bodmeier R.. Effect of poly(lactide-co-glycolide)molecular Expert Opin. Drug Deliv. Downloaded from informahealthcare.com byJilin University on10/09/12
    [85]Siepmann J, Faisant N, Akiki J, et al. Effect of the size of biodegradablemicroparticles on drug release: experiment and theory. J ControlledRelease.2004,96:123-34.
    [86]Rosca ID, Watari F, Uo M. Microparticle formation and its mechanism in singleand double emulsion solvent evaporation. J Control Release.2004,99:271-80.
    [87]Yang YY, Chia HH, Chung T-S. Effect of preparation temperature on thecharacteristics and release profi les of PLGA microspheres containing proteinfabricated by double-emulsion solvent extraction/evaporation method. J ControlRelease.2000,69:81-96.
    [88] Tewes F, Munnier E, Antoon B, et al.Comparative study of doxorubicin-loadedpoly(lactide-co-glycolide) nanoparticles prepared by single and double emulsionmethods. Eur J Pharm Biopharm.2007,66:488-92.
    [89] Zeng J, Yang L, Liang Q, et al. Infl uence of the drug compatibility with polymersolution on the release kinetics of electrospun fi ber formulation. J ControlRelease.2005,105:43-51.
    [90]Frank A, Rath SK, Venkatraman SS. Controlled release from bioerodiblepolymers: effect of drug type and polymer composition. J Control Release.2005,102:333-44.
    [91] Igartua M., Hernandez R.M., Esquisabel A., et al. Influence of formulationvariables on the in-vitro release of albumin fromBiodegradable microparticulate systems, J.Microencapsul.1997,14(3):349–356.
    [92] Wischke C., Borchert H.H.. Influence of the primary emulsification procedure onthe characteristics of small protein-loaded PLGA microparticles for antigendelivery. J. Microencapsul.2006,23(4):435-448.
    [93] Zhu K.J., Jiang H.L., Du X.Y.. Preparation and characterization of hCG-loadedpolylactide or poly (lactide-co-glycolide) microspheres using a modifiedwater-in-oil-in-water (w/o/w) emulsion solvent evaporation technique, J.Microencapsul.2001,18(2):247–260.
    [94] Jain R.A., Rhodes C.T., Railkar A.M., et al. Comparison of various injectableprotein-loaded biodegradable poly(lactide-co-glycolide)(PLGA) devices:insituformed implant versus insituformed microspheres versus isolatedmicrospheres, Pharm. Dev. Technol.2000,5(2):201-207.
    [95]Han Y.D., Tian H.Y., He P., et al. Insulin nanoparticle preparation andencapsulation into poly (lactic-co-glycolic acid) microspheres by using ananhydrous system. Int. J. Pharm.2009,378(1-2):159-166.
    [96] Wu J.H., Ding D.W., Ren G.Y., et al. Sustained delivery of endostatin improvesthe efficacy of therapy in Lewis lung cancer model. J. Control. Release.2009,134(2):91-97.
    [97] Allen T.M., Cullis P.R.. Drug delivery systems: entering the mainstream. Science.2004,303:1818-1822.
    [98]Agnihotri S.A., Mallikarjuna N.N., Aminabhavi T.M.. Recent advances onchitosan-based micro and nanoparticles in drug delivery. J. Control. Release.2004,100:25-28.
    [99]Aminabhavi T.M., Soppimath K.S., Kulkarni A.R., et al. Biodegradable polymericnanoparticles as drug delivery devices, J. Control. Release.2001,70:1–20.
    [100] Roney C., Kulkarni P., Arora V., et al. Targeted nanoparticles for drug deliverythrough the blood-brain barrier for Alzheimer's disease. J. Control.Release.2005,108:193-214.
    [101]Govender T., Stolnik S., Garnett M.C., et al. PLGA nanoparticles prepared bynanoprecipitation: drug loading and release studies of a water soluble drug, J.Control. Release.1999,57:171-185.
    [102] Jain R.A.. The manufacturing techniques of various drug loaded biodegradablepoly(lactide-co-glycolide)(PLGA) devices, Biomaterials.2000,21:2475-2490.
    [103]Augst A.D., Kong H.J., Mooney D.J.. Alginate hydrogels as biomaterials.Macromol Biosci.2006.6:623-633.
    [104]Awrey D.E., Tse M., Hortelano G., et al. Permeability of alginate microcapsulesto secretory recombinant gene products. Biotechnol Bioeng.1996,52:472-484.
    [105]Bar K.J., Saldanha G.J., Kennedy A.J., et al. GDNF and its receptor componentRet in injured human nerves and dorsal root ganglia. Neuroreport.1998,9:43-47.
    [106]Baron-Van E.A., Kleinman H.K., Seppa H.E., et al. Fibronectin promotes ratSchwann cell growth and motility. J Cell Biol.1982,93:211-216.
    [107]Bilang-Bleuel A, Revah F, Colin P, et al. Intrastriatal injection of an adenoviralvector expressing glial-cell-line-derived neurotrophic factor preventsdopaminergic neuron degeneration and behavioral impairment in a rat model ofParkinson disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA.1997,94:8818-8823.
    [108]Blesch A, Tuszynski MH.. GDNF gene delivery to injured adult CNS motorneurons promotes axonal growth, expression of the trophic neuropeptide CGRP,and cellular protection. J Comp Neurol.2001,436:399-410.
    [109]Bloch K, Vorobeychik M, Yavrians K, Azarov D, Bloch O, Vardi P. Improvedactivity of streptozotocin-selected insulinoma cells following microencapsulationand transplantation into diabetic mice. Cell Biol Int.2006,30:138-143.
    [110]Camu W, Henderson CE. Purification of embryonic rat motoneurons by panningon a monoclonal antibody to the low affinity NGF receptor. J NeurosciMeth.1992,44:59-70.
    [111]Chang P. Polymer implant materials with improved X-ray opacity andbiocompatibility. Biomaterials.1981,2:151-155.
    [112]Jeyanthi R, Thanoo BC, Metha RC,DeLuca PP. Effect of solvent removaltechnique on the matrix characteristicsof polylactide/glycolide microspheres forpeptide delivery. J Controlled Release.1996,38:235-244.
    [113]Kim TH, Park TG. Critical effect of freezing/freeze-drying on sustained releaseof FITC-dextran encapsulated within PLGA microspheres. Int J Pharm.2004,271:207-214.
    [114]Mao S, Xu J, Cai C, et al. Effect of WOW process parameters on morphologyand burst release of FITC-dextran loaded PLGA microspheres. Int J Pharm.2007,334:137-148.
    [115]Jiang Y, Wang J, Wang Y, et al. Determination of long-acting release octreotide,an octapeptide analogue of somatostation, in human plasma by liquidchromatography/tandem mass spectrometry. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom.2007,21(24):3982-3986.
    [116] Wei G., Pettway G.J.,. McCauley L.K, et al. The release profiles and bioactivityof parathyroid hormone from poly (lactic-co-glycolic acid) microspheres,Biomaterials.2004,25(2):345-352.
    [117]Yang, T.S. Chung, N.P. Morphology, drug distribution, and in vitro releaseprofiles of biodegradable polymeric microspheres containing protein fabricatedby double-emulsion solvent extraction/evaporation method, Biomaterials.2001,22(3):231-241.
    [118] Igartua M., Hernandez R.M., Esquisabel A., et al. Influence of formulationvariables on the in-vitro release of albumin from biodegradable microparticulatesystems. J.Microencapsul.1997,14(3):349-356.