闽台制造业竞合研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
闽台两地具有深厚的“五缘”文化联结,经济贸易往来由来已久。在全球化与区域经济一体化趋势不断深入发展、两岸关系不断缓和的大背景下,推动闽台制造产业发展新型竞合关系,对于促进两地产业升级,提升国际竞争力具有重要作用;同时,产业的竞合也必将会进一步加强闽台经济文化联系,加速两地经济一体化进程,对于促进两岸统一大业也有深远的意义。本研究的主要目的在于分析闽台两地制造产业的相对竞争优势;同时,在此基础上揭示两地制造业实现竞合发展的空间和前景,并对相关政策举措提出建设性意见。研究方法采用定量与定性、理论与实证结合的方式。通过对传统的双钻石模型进行修正,选取5个产业竞争力要素解构成14个构念并建立量表和问卷,实证分析闽台制造业的总体相对竞争优势;同时在此基础上进一步分析两地制造业的竞合的要素层面、可能发生的业务领域与模式。通过单钻石模型结合竞合价值网络和博弈理论分析的方式,定性分析和揭示闽台制造业在机械、石化、电子三大主导产业,研究其相对竞争优势、竞合的前景与途径。研究结果显示台湾制造业总体上明显强于福建,福建制造业的总体竞争优势在于生产成本、劳动力资源、市场需求和政府的政策支持;台湾的优势主要在管理、技术与服务。由于两地各自存在发展的瓶颈,并且具有优势互补的特点,因此具有发展竞合关系的动力和空间。就具体产业的竞争与合作而言,在福建重点对接台湾的三大产业上,机械产业、电子产业台湾比福建具有竞争优势;而石化行业两地出现两强互补的局面。机械产业中下游产品制造方面福建具有成本优势,但在上游产品的研发设计方面,台湾具备领先地位,因此在产业链上下游之间两地仍然存在合作空间;石化产业上,台湾具有在资金和管理服务方面的优势,同时掌握某些高水平工艺技术。福建具备庞大而成长迅速的市场、充沛的人力资源与坚实的科技基础,因此石化业上两地更可能实现竞合双赢局面;在电子业上,台湾拥有明显的技术优势,但也需要寻求生产制造的代工和研发的合作。两地政府应该在认真分析地区产业的特性与优劣势基础上,制定合适的政策进一步促进闽台制造业进一步发展更深层次的竞合关系,共同促进地区产业竞争力的提升。
There is a deep“WuYuan”cultural relationship between Fujian and Taiwan, and the economic trade between each other has a long history. Promoting the newly competitive and cooperative relationship between the manufacturing of Fujian and Taiwan plays an important part in promoting industrial upgrading and enhancing the international competitiveness of each other in the background of globalization, the integration of regional economy and the relationship between each other is moderated constantly. Simultaneously, the competitive and cooperative relationship between the manufacturing inevitably strengthens the cultural and economic connection and accelerates the process of economic integration between Fuajian and Taiwan, so as to promote the unity of Chinese mainland and Taiwan.
     The purpose of this paper is to analyze the comparative advantage of the manufacturing of Fujian and Taiwan, and reveal the prospects of competitive and cooperative development between each other and propose some policy suggestions based on the analysis. The methods used in this paper including qualitative and quantitative method, theoretical and empirical analysis. This paper selects five manufacturing competitive factors and fourteen component constructs to design the scale and questionnaire, empirically analyzes the relatively competitive advantage of the manufacturing between Fujian and Taiwan, and further analyzes the elements, possible business field and mode of the competitive and cooperative relationship between the manufacturing between each other by modifying the traditional double diamond model. This paper qualitatively analyzes and reveals the relatively competitive advantage, prospects and approaches in three leading industries including mechanical, petrochemical and electrom based on the combination of single diamond model with value network and cooperative game theory. The results indicate that the manufacturing of Taiwan is more competitive than Fujian. Specifically speaking, the competitive advantages of Fujian’s manufacturing mainly include costs, human resources, demand and the policy support from the local government, but the competitive advantages of Taiwan’s manufacturing mainly include management, technology and service. The competitive and cooperative relationship between Fujian and Taiwan is pomising because the complemenary between advantages and disadvntages of each other. As regard to the three leading industries mentionad above, Taiwan is more competitive in mechanical and electrom than Fujian, but both of two are complementary in petrochemical. Specifically speaking, in mechanical industry, Fujian has cost advantage in producing downstream products, but Taiwan is in leading position in the R&D of the upstream products, so there is roomage between the downstream and upstream products. In petrochemical industry, Taiwan has advantags in capital, management and service, as well as the high level of process the technology, but Fujian has advantages in huge, rapidly growing market, abundant human resources and solid technology base , so both of Fujian and Taiwan may benefit from the competitive and cooperative relationship petrochemical industry. In electrom industry, Taiwan has apparent advantages in technology but also needs to seek cooperation in processing and R&D.
     The government of Fujian and Taiwan should formulate appropriate policy to further echance the deep competitive and cooperative relationship in manufacturing and the competitiveness of the industry based on the seriously analyzing on the features, advantages and disadvantages of the industry of each other.
引文
[1]苏东水.东方管理学[M],上海:复旦大学出版社.2005.
    [2]苏东水.产业经济学[M],北京:高等教育出版社.2006.
    [3]苏东水.《应用经济学》[M],上海:东方出版中心.2005.
    [4]迈克尔.波特.竞争论[M],北京:中信出版社,2003.
    [5]潘卡基.格玛沃特.产业竞争博弈[M].北京:人民人民邮电出版社,2002.
    [6]彼得.林德特,查尔斯·金德尔伯格.国际经济学[M],上海:上海译文出版1985.
    [7]安国良,王国生,刘志彪.现代产业经济分析[M],南京:南京大学出版社,2001.
    [8]安娜.格兰多里.企业网络:组织和产业竞争力[M],北京:中国人民大学出版社2005.
    [9]张朋柱,叶红心.合作博弈理论与应用:非完全利益群体合作管理[M].上海:上海交通大学出版,2006.
    [10]阿尔弗雷德·韦伯.工业区位论[M],北京:商务印书馆,1997.
    [11]迈克尔·波特.竞争优势[M].北京:华夏出版社,1998.
    [12]保罗·克鲁格曼.地理和贸易[M],北京:中国人民大学出版社,2000.
    [13]保罗·克鲁格曼.发展、地理学与经济理论[M],北京:中国人民大学出版社2000.
    [14]邓肯·J·瓦茨.有序与无序之间的网络动力学[M],北京:人民大学出版社,2006.
    [15]陈秀山,张可云.区域经济理论[M],北京:商务印书馆出版社,2003.
    [16]李非著.海峡两岸经济合作问题研究[M],九洲出版社,2000.
    [17]严正.台湾产业结构升级研究[M],九洲出版社,2003..
    [18]严正,蔡秀玲主编.闽台经济合作研究[M],中国社会科学出版社,2000.
    [19]福建社科院编著.2003-200年福建经济社会发展预测蓝皮书[M],福建人民出版社2004年。
    [20]施振荣,联网组织.知识经济的经营之道[M],生活·读书·新知,三联书店(北京)2008年.
    [21]卢锋.产品内分工:一个框架[M],北京大学中国经济研究中心2004年讨论稿.
    [22]于宗先.台湾经济发展的困境与出路[M],五南图书出版有限公司(台北)1998年。
    [23]隅谷三喜男.台湾经济发展的成就与问题[M],新兴工业化群体的典例分析,厦门大学出版社l997年。
    [24]瞿宛文.全球化下的台湾经济[M],唐山出版社,2003年。
    [25]朱·弗登伯格,让·梯若尔所.博弈论[M].北京:人民大学出版社,2002.
    [26]朱·弗登伯格,戴维·K·莱文.博弈学习理论[M].北京:人民大学出版社,2002.
    [27]朱建华.福建化工,在改革开放中前进[J],中国化工,1994(6).
    [28]赵怡玟.台湾石化产业分析[J].科技与产业, 2010(1).
    [29]臧其梅.台湾电子信息产业发展综述[J].现代电子技术, 1997(6).
    [30]机械产业分析与投资机会.经济部投资业务处[R].民国97年2月.
    [31]林世渊.台湾电子资讯产业的现状与发展趋势[J].海峡科技与产业,2000 (1).
    [32]汪建国.台湾机械工业现状和发展方向[J].海峡科技与产业1996(6).
    [33]刘信宏.台湾机械产业如何面对世纪经济的发展[J].机械工业杂志2010(9).
    [34]许东宏.福建机械工业2002年发展简述[J].机电技术2003 (1).
    [35]刘衡,王龙伟,李垣.竞合理论研究前沿探析[J],外国经济与管理,2009(9).
    [36]蔡岚.区域政府合作中的难题及其求解[J].前沿,2006(10).
    [37]曹虹剑.模块化组织及其竞争优势[J].湖南师范大学社会科学学报,2006(9).
    [38]曹建海.试论有效竞争[J].北京师范大学学报社科版,1999(6).
    [39]常修泽,高明华.中国国民经济市场化的推进程度及发展思路[J].经济研1998(6).
    [40]陈贺强.关于改进和完善我国区域经济合作的思考[J].重庆职业技术学院学报,2006(3).
    [41]陈继祥,霍沛军,王忠民.超竞争下的企业战略协同[J].交通大学学报社科版,2000(4).
    [42]陈学光,徐金发.网络组织及其惯例的形成:基于演化论的视角[J].中国工业经济,2006(4).
    [43]陈莞.产业群内局部过度竞争的理论分析与对策[J].华东经济管理,2005(3).
    [44]程德华.有限理性下的企业合作竞争的进化博弈分析[J].计算机与数字工程,2005(5).
    [45]崔世春.中国市场化:成就与不足[J].华东理工大学学报社科版,1999(1).
    [46]邓晓辉.企业研究新视角:企业声誉理论[J].外国经济与管理,2004(6).
    [47]董广茂,李垣,周玉泉.承诺与学习能力在建立合作-竞争关系中的作用[J].管理科学学报,2006(2).
    [48]刘朝明.区域经济一体化与中国的发展战略选择[J].经济学动态,2002(4) .
    [49]黎元生.市场化进程中台湾农业国际竞争力的下降与竞争优势的重构[J].台湾研究,2003(2) .
    [50]单玉丽.加入WTO后海峡两岸合作之探析[J].台湾研究,200l(3) .
    [51]陈正男,谭大纯.两岸产业互动模式之粗探[J].台大管理论衡,民88(3)..
    [52]李非,曾刚.基于竞争优势的区域产业竞合博弈分析[J].改革与战略, 2007 (3).
    [53]唐梅光.福建三大主导产业发展的优劣势比较分析[J].发展研究,2006(2).
    [54]何立兴.亚太营运中心带来新商机[J].统领(台湾)1994年第6期..
    [55]何美因.创造台湾新一波竞争力[J].台湾经济论坛2003年第9期.
    [56]李世华.略论区域合作[J].理论视野,2006(3).
    [57]李勇,陈旭东.基于博弈论的合作竞争战略[J].中国软科学,2001(9).
    [58]林丽萍.基于进化博弈的企业合作竞争ESS分析[J].广西工学院学报,2006(9).
    [59]刘静波.网络视角下的产业博弈分析[J].财贸研究,2007(2).
    [60]刘慧宏,余洁雅,祁明德,糜仲春.合作竞争博弈及其求解[J].预测,2005(2).
    [61]于宗先.台湾经济发展对中国大陆的意义[J].海峡评论,台北:海峡评论杂志社,1997(82),77-89.
    [62]文现深.福建海峡西岸经济区──用经济脐带牵引台湾[J].天下杂志(台北), 2006 (6),121-123.
    [63]王凤生,郑育仁.从高科技产业动态发展模式解析两岸产业竞合策略[J].科技管理学刊,2003(1).
    [64]王斌,田志龙.多点竞争战略中的企业动态博弈模型分析[J].企业管理,2005(8).
    [65]王育春,李明水.区域政府经济合作之探析[J].集团经济研究,2006(11).
    [66]李非.海峡西岸经济区对台经贸关系[J].两岸关系(北京),2008 (4 ),13.
    [67]宋秉忠.ATEAM教电子业善待同行[J].今周刊(台北), 2008 (4),175.
    [68]赵耀莺.合作竞争:企业竞争的新理念[J].山西财经大学学报,2001(4).
    [69]周长辉.竞合时代:博弈与企业战略[J].北大商业评论,2005(7).
    [70]何琦瑜,游常山.汽车业大车厂转攻大卖场[J].天下杂志(台北), 1997(6).
    [71]邱永和等.电子业赴大陆投资之绩效评估[J].真理财经学报(台北), 2008(12).
    [72]洪家宁,辜树仁.大三通如何渗透你的食衣住行[J].天下杂志(台北),2008(12).
    [73]林震岩,林雅惠,赖惠君.福建省海峡西岸经济区之台商投资分析[J].明新学报(新竹:明新学报编辑委员会), 2009(2).
    [74]杨玛利,游常山.严凯泰挑战品牌梦[J].远见杂志(台北), 2009(10).
    [75]张健华等.闽台旅游合作的共生模式研究[J].福建论坛:人文社会科学,2008 (3).
    [76]陈良榕.中国汽车土洋大战[J].天下杂志(台北),2004 (7).
    [77]陈添枝.顾莹华.台日韩企业在中国大陆投资策略比较[J].开放导报,2003.
    [78]廖德琦.黑手红了新兆元产业来了[J].新台湾新闻周刊(台北), 2007(6).
    [79]黄健群.让海西区成为台湾的机会[J].产业杂志(台北:中华民国工业总会), 2009 (7).
    [80]卢明华,李国平.从产业链角度论中国电子信息产业发展[J].中国科技论坛(北京),2008(6).
    [81]赖文凤.两岸水果业的合作与发展的SOWT分析[J].台湾研究两岸经贸(北京),2007(3).
    [82]福建社会科学院课题组.推进海峡经济区发展的战略构想[J].海峡经济(福建: 131海峡经济编辑部), 2009(5).
    [83]傅丰诚.两岸生物科技产业竞合策略[J].国家政策季刊(台北),2004(9).
    [84]瞿宛文.自由化与全球化之后的台湾石化业[J].台湾社会研究季刊(台北), 2001(12).
    [85]刘进兴.反方辩论核心产业西进应该有效管理—以八吋晶圆产业为例[J].经济前瞻(台北),2002(5 ).
    [86]刘衡,王龙伟,李垣.竞合理论研究前沿探析[J].国外经济与管理,2009(9).
    [87]乔安水.阴阳哲学探源[J].烟台大学学报,2003(3).
    [88]左亚文.阴阳和合的普遍特性及其辩证意义[J].中南民族大学学报,2003 (1).
    [89]刘映仙.台湾科技产业发展现状与两岸科技交流及合作前景[J].台湾研究1999(3) .
    [90]金秋.台湾石化上业发展现状[J].海峡科技与产业1999 (4)..
    [91]林世渊.面向新世纪台湾调整石化产业[J].海峡科技与产业1999(1).
    [92]曾建萍.千余家台企根植福州[J].海峡科技2003(9)年第9期。
    [93]石正方.厦门海湾型城市建设中台资产业集群发展的意义及其对策[J].特区经济2003(11).
    [94]张沽.台湾企业经营的新方式--策略联盟[J].海峡科技与产业,1998(4).
    [95]福建省委政研审课题组.推进福建电子信息产业发展战略研究[J].200(3).
    [96]王辑花.高新技术产业开发区对区域发展影响的分析构架[J].中国工业经济,1998(2).
    [97]黄瑾等.福建工业竞争力的现状[J].福建社会主义学院学报,2004(2).
    [98]黄茂兴.黄聪英.关于闽台资源与产业互动的分析[J].区域经济,2006(9).
    [99]唐彦博.两岸高科技产业竞合关系之探讨策略[J].湖北大学学报, 2006(1).
    [100]钟俊娟,福建工业发展状况研究[J].湖南工业职业技术学院学报(湖南),2008(12).
    [101]严正.海峡西岸经济区建设研究—闽台产业对接与海峡西岸经济区建设[J].中共福建省委党校学报,2006(7).
    [102]叶玲玲.掌上型电脑业向笔记本型电脑厂抢人[N].工商时报(台北),1998(8).
    [103]福建省统计局,我省高新技术产业发展状况调查报告[R].2003年统计分析报告,2003(12)..
    [104]福建省政协港澳侨台和外事委员会.拓展闽台经济合繁荣海峡四岸经济区—闽台经济合作现状及对策调查[R].福建省政协办公厅调研报告汇编,2004(5).
    [105]王风生等.从高科技产业动态发展模式解析两岸产业竞合策略[C].台湾科技管理研讨会论文,2002。
    [106]吴能远.海峡两岸产业合作的宏观思考[C].台湾研究集刊,1995(2).
    [107]刘静波.产业竞合:合作博弈、网络平台与制度条件[D].上海社会科学院研究生毕业、学位论文,2007.
    [108]宋滟滟.区域经济一体化的经济效应及其对我国的影响[D].杭州:浙江工业大学,2002.
    [109]庄荣良.海峡两岸产业分工合作的动因、模式与经济效应研究[D].厦门大学博士学位论文,2009.
    [110] Abreu, D. On the Theory of Infinitely Repeated Games[J]. Econometrica, 1988, 56: 383-396.
    [111] Abreu,D.,Pearce,D and Stacchitti,E.Toward a Theory of Discounted Repeated Games with Imperfect Monitoring[J].Econometrica,1990,58:1041-1063.184
    [112] Alchain,AandDemsetz,H.Production,InformationCostsandEconomicOrganization[J].AmericanEconomic Review,1972,62:777-795.
    [113] Andersson,U.Some Notes on Subsidiary Network Embeddedness and its Effects on the MultinationalCorporation[R].Sweden,Uppsala University,Department of Business Studies,Working Paper,1999.
    [114] Aoki,Mand Takizawa, H.Modularity:Its Relevance to Industrial Architecture[R] The Saint-GlobainCentre for Economic Research 5th Conference“Organizational Innovation within Firms”, 2000.
    [115] Badaracco,J.L.Jr.The knowledge Link:How Firms Compete Through Strategic Alliances[M].Boston,MA:Harvard Business School Press,1991.
    [116] Bain,J.S.Barriers to New Competition[M].Cambridge,Mass:Harvard University Press,1956.
    [117] Bain,J.S.Industrial Organization[M].New York,John Wiley,1959.9.Bala,V and Goyal,S.A Noncooperative Model of Network Formation[J]. Economietrica, 2000,68: 1181-1229.
    [118] Baldwin,C.Y and Clark,K.B.Managing in an Age of Modularity[J].Harvard Business Review, 1997,75:84-93.
    [119] Baldwin,C.YandClark,K.B.DesignRules,Volume1:thePowerofModularity[M].Cambridge, MA:MIT Press,2000.
    [120] Baumol,W.J.Contestable Market:An Uprising in the Theory of Industry Structure[J].The AmericanEconomic Review,1982,72:1-15.
    [121] Bengtsson,M and Kock,S.Cooperation and Competition in Relationships between Competitors in
    [122] Benham,L.The Effects of Advertising on the Price of Eyeglasses[J].Journal of Law and Economics, 1972,15:337-352.
    [123] Bernhiem,D.,Peleg,B and Whinston, M. Coalition-Proof Nash Equilibrium[J]. Journal of EconomicTheory,1986,42:1-12.
    [124] Blois,K.J.VerticalQuasi-integration[J].JournalofIndustrialEconomics,1972,20:253-271.
    [125] Boddy,D, Macbeth, D and Wagner B. Implementing Collaboration Between organizations :AnEmpirical Study of Chain Partnering[J]. Journal of Management Studies, 2000 ,37: 1003-1017.
    [126] Brandenburger, A and Nalebuff ,B.Co-opetition[M].Cambridge,MA:Harvard Business Press,1996. 19Braun ,M.Differential Equation and Their Application[M]. New York, Springger-Verlag, 1983.
    [127] Butler,R and Carney,M.G.Managing Markets:Implications for the Make-Buy Decision[J].Journalof Management Studies,1983,20:213-31.
    [128] Butters,G.Equilibrium Distribution of Prices and Advertising[J].Review of Economic Studies, 1979, 44:465-492.
    [129] Caose,R.The Nature of the Firm[J].Economica,1937,4:386-405.
    [130] Demsetz,H.Barriers to Entry[J].The American Economic Review,1982,72:47-57.
    [131] Dennis, M. InnovationNetworks and Territorial Dynamics:A Tentative Typology, Patterns of Network Economy[M]. New York: Springer~Verlag, 1993.
    [132] Deutsch,M.Fifty Years of Conflict[M].New York,Oxford University Press,1980, 46-77.
    [133] Deutsch,M.The Resolution of Conflict[M].New Haven,Yale University Press, 1973, 5-20.
    [134] Diamond,P.Aggregate Demand Management in Search Equilibrium[J].Journal of Political Economic,1982,90:881-894..
    [135] Butters,G.Equilibrium Distribution of Prices and Advertising[J].Review of Economic Studies, 1979 ,44: 465-492.
    [136] Caose,R.The Nature of the Firm[J].Economica,1937,4:386-405.
    [137] Dasgupta,P and Stiglitz,J.Uncertainy,Industrial Structure and the Speed of R&D[J]. Bell Journal of Economics,1980,11:1-28.
    [138] Demsetz,H.Barriers to Entry[J].The American Economic Review,1982,72:47-57.
    [139] Dennis,M.Innovation Networks and Territorial Dynamics: A Tentative Typology ,Patterns ofNetwork Economy[M]. New York: Springer~Verlag, 1993.
    [140] Deutsch,M.Fifty Years of Conflict[M].New York,Oxford University Press, 1980, 46-77.
    [141] Deutsch,M.The Resolution of Conflict[M].New Haven,Yale UniversityPress,1973,5-20.
    [142] Diamond,P.Aggregate Demand Management in Search Equilibrium[J].Journal of Political Econo-mic,1982,90: 881-894.
    [143] Duhaime,Irene,M.,etal.Determinates of Competitive Advantage in the Network Form: a Pilot Study[R], 2002.
    [144] Dutta,B and Mutuswamy,S.Stable Networks[J].Journal of Economic Theory,1997, 76: 322-344.
    [145] Fombrun,C.J and Rindova,V.Who’s Tops and Who Decides?The Social Construction of Corporate.
    [146] Reputations[R].New York University,Stern School of Business,Working Paper,1996.
    [147] Fugenberg,D.Rational Expectations Business Cycles in Search Equilibrium[J]. Journal of PoliticalEconomic, 1989 ,97: 606-619.
    [148] Fudenberg, D and Harris C.Evolutionary Dynamics with Aggregate Stocks[J]. Journal of Economic Theory, 1992, 57: 420- 441.
    [149] Fudenberg,D.,Levin,D and Maskin,E.The Folk Theorem with Imperfect Public Information[J].Econometrica,1994,62:997-1039.
    [150] Fudenberg,D and Maskin,E.The Folk Theorem in Repeated Games with Discounting or with In-complete Information[J].Econometrica,1986,54:533-554.
    [151] Gosti,M and Wilson,A.M.Corporate Reputation:Seeking a Definition of Cooperate Communica-tions[J].An International Journal,2001,6:24-30.
    [152] Gomes-Casseres, B. Group versus Group:How alliance networks Compete[J]. Harvard Business Review,1994,72:62-74.
    [153] Hotelling,H.Stability in Competition[J].Economic Journal,1929,39:41-57.
    [154] Kogut,B.Designing Global Strategies:Comparative and Competitive Value-added Chains[J].Sloan Management Review,1985, 26:15-28.187
    [155] Repeated Prisoners’Dilemma[J]. Journal of Economic Theory,1 982, 27:254-252.
    [156] Loury,G,C.Market Structure and Innovation[J].Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1979,93:395-410.
    [157] Lundvall, B. A.Innovation as an Interactive Process:from User producer Interaction to the Nadional system of Innovation[J]. California Management Review, 1988, 38: 77-94.
    [158] Obstfeld,M.Models of Currency Crisis with Self-fulfilling Features[J].European Economic Review,1996,40:1037-1047.
    [159] Panzar,J,C and Willig,R.D.Economies of Scope[J].The American Economic Review, 1981,72
    [160] Inter Firm Strategic Alliances[J]. OMEGA International Journal of Management Science, 1993,21:531-539.
    [161] Porter, M, E. Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors[M]. New188