摘要
本研究分离并鉴定了一株猪繁殖与呼吸综合征病毒(PRRSV),即猪蓝耳病病毒,经病毒生物学特性测定、病毒基因鉴定、血清学试验,确定该分离毒株为美洲型PRRSV,将其命名为JL/07/SW株。根据美洲型猪繁殖与呼吸综合征病毒VR-2332株及变异毒株的核苷酸序列,针对N基因、Nsp2变异序列、以及GP5基因设计合成了的特异引物,扩增出正确的目的基因序列,测定序列经比对后,发现该毒株与美洲型毒株的同源性高于欧洲型,故判断该毒株属于美洲型变异毒株,本分离毒株其基因组在Nsp2上缺失了30个氨基酸,而GP5和M基因也存在变异,但是相对保守。
膜蛋白质组是指在特定条件和特定时间细胞中的全部膜蛋白。研究膜蛋白质组的目的在于:更加深入理解膜蛋白在基本生物学过程中的作用;揭示特定细胞类型或病原体细胞表面蛋白质的表达谱,为研究疫苗和生物医学治疗积累数据。
本研究应用2D-PAGE及MALDI-TOF MS/MS分析猪繁殖与呼吸综合征病毒体外感染MARC-145细胞及体内感染猪肺泡巨噬细胞(PAMs)差异细胞膜蛋白,揭示PRRSV感染引起的细胞膜蛋白表达变化,筛选并鉴定差异表达膜蛋白,并对部分蛋白进行初步的功能分析鉴定。首先用病毒体外感染MARC-145细胞,经间接免疫荧光试验确定膜蛋白提取时间为病毒感染细胞后48小时,收集约108个病毒感染及正常细胞,加入细胞膜蛋白裂解液,离心后收取上清液作为膜蛋白样品,用BCA法测定膜蛋白浓度后,进行二维凝胶电泳、染色、图像扫描与分析,然后对所选取的差异表达蛋白进行胶内酶解及质谱分析,最后进行Western Blotting分析验证二维凝胶电泳的分析结果,结果共鉴定了12个差异表达蛋白(7个上调蛋白,6个下调蛋白)。同时,本研究进行了体内试验,病毒感染仔猪,在病毒感染急性期时,采取猪臂动脉丛放血致死,获取猪肺泡巨噬细胞,进行二维凝胶电泳及质谱技术鉴定差异蛋白、Western Blotting验证,成功鉴定了17个差异表达蛋白(10个上调蛋白,7个下调蛋白)。其中波形蛋白(vimentin)、丝切蛋白( cofilin)、抗氧化应激蛋白过氧化物酶-6 (PRDX6)、抗氧化应激蛋白过氧化物酶-2 (PRDX2)、热休克蛋白(HSP)、ubiquitin(泛素)等蛋白在感染细胞中差异表达,这些蛋白可能参与了病毒感染、细胞凋亡及机体免疫等过程。
对病毒感染的差异膜蛋白vimentin、PRDX2,设计特异引物进行RT-PCR扩增目的片段,构建真核表达质粒,转染细胞,筛选阳性克隆细胞,构建过表达MARC-145细胞,对构建的过表达细胞接种病毒,同时设置正常细胞对照,通过观察细胞病变、测定病毒滴度及实时荧光定量PCR方法检测病毒复制情况。结果表明过表达波形蛋白的MARC-145细胞接种PRRSV后,病毒滴度提高,荧光信号强度增加,病毒GP5基因拷贝数增加,说明波形蛋白可能是病毒受体复合物的部分,在病毒的增殖过程中起到了重要作用。
Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome (PRRS) is one of the most economically significant viral diseases of swine, frustrating challenge to the global swine industry. It is characterized by severe reproductive failure in sows and respiratory distress in growing pigs and piglets. The causative agent of PRRS, porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV), is a member of the family Arteriviridae, which is composed of a group of positive sense, single stranded RNA viruses, including simian hemorrhagic fever virus (SHFV), equine arteritis virus (EAV), and lactate dehydrogenase-elevating virus (LDV). PRRSV has a highly restricted cell tropism both in vivo and in vitro. PRRSV infects the African green monkey kidney cell line, MA-104 and its derivatives, MARC-145, and CL-2621 in vitro. PRRSV preferentially infects the cells of the monocyte/macrophage lineage, especially porcine alveolar macrophages (PAMs), in the natural host. Both in PAMs and in the monkey kidney-derived cell lines, the virus enters through a mechanism of receptor-mediated endocytosis.
Little is known about the molecular mechanisms of PRRSV pathogenesis. The interactions between the virus and host cell are complex and mutual when a virus invades the host. However, most of the cellular functions altered after PRRSV infection are still unknown; hence, a comprehensive study of the interaction between PRRSV and its cells was needed.
The proteomic analysis of host cellular responses to virus infection may provide new insight into cellular mechanisms involved in viral pathogenesis.To date, proteomic approaches, coupling two-dimensional electrophoresis (2-DE) and mass spectrometry (MS), have been widely used to study the mechanisms of viral infection through the comparative analysis of cellular protein profiles. This procedure, by comparing protein expression patterns of normal and infected cells, can provide exclusive information about how host cells respond to viral infection. Proteomic changes in infected host cells have been studied for many pathogenic mammal viruses, including human immunodeficiency virus type-1 (HIV-1), severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS)-associated coronavirus, rabies virus, Nipah virus and African swine fever virus.
Viral infections usually result in alterations in the host cell proteome which determine the fate of the infected cells and the progress of pathogenesis. To uncover cellular protein responses in porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus-infected pulmonary alveolar macrophages (PAMs) and MARC-145 cells, a proteomic analysis was conducted using 2-DE followed by MALDITOF-MS/MS identification. Altered expression of 44 protein spots in infected cells were identified in 2D gels, with 29 of these being characterized by MALDI-TOF-MS/MS, including 17 up-regulated proteins and 12 down-regulated proteins. Western-blot analysis confirmed the up-regulation of heat shock 27 kDa protein (HSP27), vimemtin and down-regulation of galectin-1. Our study is the first attempt to analyze the cellular protein profile of PRRSV-infected MARC-145 cells by proteomics and provide valuable information for better understanding the function alterations of MARC-145 cells induced by PRRSV infection. The altered expression of these proteins provides a response profile of host cells (PAMs and MARC-145 cells) to PRRSV infection. Further study of these altered proteins may facilitate understanding the mechanisms of PRRSV infection and pathogenesis.
Of the altered cytoskeletal proteins, cofilin-1 and vimentin were up-regulated. Maybe the cytoskeleton proteins collapse and disperse in PRRSV-infected cells. Recent evidences demonstrate that various viruses manipulate and utilize the host cytoskeleton to promote viral infection. Although these proteins may not be specific to PRRSV, most of the cytoskeleton alterations detected in PRRSV-infected cells were caused by PRRSV infection. Vimentin is an important cellular cytoskeleton component. It is in radial arrangement in cytoplasm, forming a frame to support the actomyosin system and other organelles. It can prevent the cell from being injured by changing its tension, thus keeping the cellular shape. In some viral infections, vimentin has been reported to be reorganized probably lead to unstable cytoskeletal structure. Several studies have shown that human immunodeficiency virus type 1 protease cleaves intermediate filament (IF) vimentin and induces the collapse of vimentin in infected cells. Proteomic analysis of CEFs infected with IBDV also found many cytoskeleton proteins have been up- or down-regulated significantly, vimentin protein changes at equal pace with our date. Further more, the result is the same as Fatemel’s study, they found vimentin was up-regulated in CVS infected BHK-21 cells. Therefore, precise role of vimentin cleavage and specific rearrangement of cell architecture during PRRSV infection could be important for better understanding the PRRSV replication process.
Another group of up-regulated proteins of interest in our present study was ubiquitin-proteasome pathway (UPP), in the ubiquitin–proteasome pathway, a major intracellular protein degradation pathway, has recently been implicated in viral infections, including avoidance of host immune surveillance, viral maturation, viral progeny release, efficient viral replication, and reactivation of virus from latency. In this study, ubiquitin was identified as differentially expressed cellular proteins during PRRSV infection in MARC-145 cell. The best known function of ubiquitin in proteolysis is to serve as a signal for the target protein to be recognized and degraded in the proteasome. Host responses to viral infection may reflect a host defense mechanism. However, improper host protein regulation, for instance, aberrant host protein degradation, may further promote viral replication and cause tissue damage.
Two antioxidative stress proteins, peroxiredoxin-6 (Prx6) and peroxiredoxin-2 (Prx2), were up-regulated, which may indicate that PRRSV infection induces host cell oxidative stress. The peroxiredoxin (Prx) family has attracted recent attention in terms of the potential antioxidant and redox signaling functions of these enzymes. Six peroxiredoxins (Prxs 1 through 6) have been identified in mammals. The cytosolic Prx2 has two highly conserved cysteine residues that become oxidized by hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and hydroperoxides, resulting in the reversible formation of a homodimer. Human erythrocyte Prx2 reacts extremely rapidly with H2O2, with a rate constant similar to those of the catalases and glutathione peroxidases. Prx6 is a bifunctional 25 kDa protein with both GSH (glutathione) peroxidase and phospholipase A2 activities. Overexpression of Prx6 in cells can protect against oxidative stress, whereas antisense treatment results in oxidant stress and apoptosis .
In this study, heat shock protein has been found both in MARC-145 cells and PAMs infected with PRRSV. Up-regulated HSPB1 has been found in cells infected with African swine fever virus, enterovirus 71, or FHV. Heat shock protein 27 KDa (HSP27) is a stress-inducible ubiquitous cellular protein and is involved in thermotolerance, cellular proliferation and apoptosis, and molecular chaperoning. It has been found to be up-regulated during certain viral infections. In the present study, heat shock protein was up-regulation during PRRSV infection, and further investigation will be required to understand its role in this. The phosphorylated HSPB1 was shown to prevent F-actin depolymerization by regulating microfilament dynamics and stabilizing the actin cytoskeleton under stress condition and to prevent caspase-independent apoptosis.
We found increased intracellular levels of cystatin B in PRRSV-infected PAMs when compared with uninfected cells. A previous report has suggested that Cystatin B was even higher in both uninfected and HIV-infected MDM when compared to uninfected and HIV-infected placental macrophages where HIV replication is restricted compared to MDM.
Cystatins are natural tight-binding, reversible inhibitors of cysteine proteases. Because these cysteine proteases exist in all living organisms and because they are involved in various biological and pathological processes, including protein catabolism, antigen processing, inflammation, dystrophy and metastasis, control of their enzymatic function by cystatins is of cardinal importance. The precise roles of increased expression of this protein during PRRSV infection need further investigation.
Virus induced oxidative stress is associated with the activation of phagocytosis and the release of reactive oxygen species (ROS) that plays the positive modulatory role in immune activation, eradication of viral infection and immune-induced cellular injury. Superoxide dismutase 1 (SOD1) is localized both in the cytoplasm and in the intermembrane space of mitochondria. Because of its ability to scavenge superoxide, SOD1 is considered an essential defence against the downstream generation of ROS other than O2?, even more toxic than superoxide itself. In this function, SOD1 is more efficient than SOD2. SOD1 has been found to be up-regulated during PRRSV infection in PAMs. In the present study, however, SOD1 was more notable for its down-regulation during PRRSV infection, and further investigation will be required to understand its role in this.
In this experiment, Galectin-1 shows down-regulation in PRRSV infected PAMs and MARC-145 cells comparison with uninfected cells. One of such lectin families, galectins, has been recently suggested to play functional roles in various immune response processes through binding to host surface glycoproteins. All of them lack typical transmembrane segments, secretion signal peptides, and most acquire an acetylated amino terminus. Several lines of evidence imply that galectins participate in the immune response, both as immunomodulators and molecules that facilitate pathogen-host cell interactions. In addition, recent works suggest that galectins could facilitate pathogen internalization in phagocytic cells, such as macrophages. Galectin-1, a homodimer of 14 kDa subunits possessing two CRDs, recognizes the structural motif Galβ1-4GlcNAc. Because such sequences are present on cell surface glycoconjugates, galectin-1 mediates cellular adhesion processes. Furthermore, galectin-1 has been shown to have an immunoregulatory function. Administration of galectin-1 prevented experimental induced autoimmune encephalomyelitis in rats and was prophylactic and therapeutic in a rabbit model of autoimmune myasthenia gravis.
Galectin-1 expression has been reported in thymus and lymphoid parenchymal epithelial cells, endothelial cells, trophoblasts, activated T cells, macrophages, activated B cells, follicular dendritic cells and CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells. Galectin-1 can increase adsorption of X4-using isolates of HIV-1 onto CD4+ T lymphocytes, thus enhancing the overall infection process. It means that when PRRSV is infected by PAMs, it inhibits the expression of Galectin-1, and then adjusts the reproduction of the cells and resists the cell apoptosis, which is good for the persistent infection of the cells.
In summary, this study adopted a gel-based proteomics approach to probe the serially changed proteins in PRRSV infected PAMs and MARC-145 cells. It is noteworthy that the comparative proteomics approach allowed for the initial identification of 29 altered cellular proteins during PRRSV infection and showed that most of the altered cellular proteins appear to have roles in revealing the viral pathogenesis. It should be noted that this study has examined only the changed proteins in PRRSV infected PAMs and MARC-145 cells. The results do not imply mechanisms of PRRSV infection and pathogenesis and the function of these altered proteins during PRRSV infection. Clearly further large scale studies are necessary to understand the roles of the differentially expressed cellular proteins in PRRSV infection.
引文
[1] Collins, J. E., D. A. Benfield, W. T. Christianson, L. Harris, J. C. Hennings,D. P. Shaw, S. M. Goyal, S. McCullough, R. B. Morrison, H. S. Joo, D.Gorcyca, and D. Chladek. 1992. Isolation of swine infertility and respiratory syndrome virus (isolate ATCC VR-2332) in North America and experimental reproduction of the disease in gnotobiotic pigs. J. Vet. Diagn. Investig.4:117–126.
[2] Terpstra, C., G. Wensvoort, and J. M. A. Pol. 1991. Experimental reproduction of porcine epidemic abortion and respiratory syndrome (mystery swine disease) by infection with Lelystad virus: Koch’s postulates fulfilled. Vet. Q.13:131–136.
[3]陈博文,孙颖杰,罗长保.PRRS的血清学检测及病毒的分离与鉴定[J].中国兽医杂志,1996,22(5):6.
[4]郭宝清,陈章水.哈兽研所首次证实国内猪群存在PRRSV感染[J]畜牧兽医科技信息,1996,01:8.
[5] Duan, X., H. J. Nauwynck, and M. B. Pensaert. 1997. Effects of origin and state of differentiation and activation of monocytes/macrophages on their susceptibility to PRRSV. Arch. Virol. 142:2483–2497.
[6] Kreutz, L. C., and M. R. Ackerman. 1996. Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus enters cells through a low pH-dependent endocytic pathway. Virus Res. 42:137–147.
[7] Nauwynck, H. J., X. Duan, H. W. Favoreel, P. Van Oostveldt, and M. B.Pensaert. 1999. Entry of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus into porcine alveolar macrophages via receptor-mediated endocytosis.J. Gen. Virol. 80:297–305.
[8] Rossow, K.D., Benfield, D.A., Goyal, S.M., Nelson, E.A., Christopher-Hennings, J., and Collins, J.E., Chronological immunohistochemical detection and localization of porcine eproductive and respiratory syndrome virus in gnotobiotic pigs[J].Vet. Pathol.1996,33:551-556.
[9] Benfield, D. A., E. Nelson, J. E. Collins, L. Harris, S. M. Goyal, D. Robinson,W. T. Christianson, R. B. Morrison, D. Gorcyca, and D. Chladek. 1992. Characterisation of swine infertility and respiratory syndrome (SIRS) virus (isolate ATCC VR-2332). J. Vet. Diagn. Investig. 4:127–133.
[10] Delputte, P. L., S. Costers, and H. J. Nauwynck. 2005. Analysis of porcine reproductive andrespiratory syndrome virus attachment and internalization: distinctive roles for heparin sulfate and sialoadhesin. J. Gen. Virol. 86:1441-1445.
[11] Delputte, P. L., Vanderheijden, N., Nauwynck, H. J. & Pensaert, M. B.(2002). Involvement of the matrix protein in attachment of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus to a heparin like receptor on porcine alveolar macrophages. J Virol 76, 4312–4320.
[12] Duan, X. B., H. J. Nauwynck, H. W. Favoreel, and M. B. Pensaert. 1998. Identification of a putative receptor for porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus on porcine alveolar macrophages. J. Virol. 72:4520-4523.
[13] Nathalie Vanderheijden, Peter L. Delputte, Herman W. Favoreel, Jo?l Vandekerckhove, Jozef Van Damme, Peter A. van Woensel, and Hans J. Nauwynck Involvement of Sialoadhesin in Entry of Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Virus into Porcine Alveolar Macrophages J. Virol. 2003, 77: 8207-8215.
[14] Calvert J.G., Slade D.E., Shields S.L., Jolie R., Mannan R.M., Ankenbauer R.G., Welch S.K.W.CD163 Expression Confers Susceptibility to Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Viruses. J. Virol. 9 May 2007.
[15] Cancel-Tirado S.M., Evans R.B.,and respiratory syndrome virus Yoon K.J. Monoclonal antibody analysis of porcine reproductive epitopes associated with antibody-dependent enhancement and neutralization of virus infection. Vet Immunol Immunopathol. 2004, 102(3): 249-262.
[16] Canal J., Rodriguez M.J.,Sarraseca J,Garcia J., Piana-Duran J., Sanz A. Identification of a common antigenic site in the nucleocapsid protein of European and North American isolates of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus. Adv Exp Med Biol. 1998, 440: 469-477.
[17] Cavanagh D., Nidovirdae: a new order comprising Coronaviridae and Arteriviridae. Arch.Virol.1997, 142: 629-v633
[18]刘萍,陈苗苗,乔莉萍,王凡,刘学荣,牟克斌,黄银君.猪繁殖与呼吸综合征病毒致病机理的研究进展[J].中国畜牧兽医, 2010, (01) :158-161
[19] Calvert JG, Slade DE, Shields SL, Jolie R, Mannan RM, Ankenbauer RG, Welch SK. CD163 expression confers susceptibility to porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome viruses. J Virol. 2007 Jul;81(14):7371-9.
[20] Van Gorp H, Van Breedam W, Van Doorsselaere J, Delputte PL, Nauwynck HJ.Identification of the CD163 protein domains involved in infection of the porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus. J Virol. 2009 89(2943-2953).
[21] Ping an Xia, Zhan guo Dang, Huang Qiu, Xu Fan, Bin Zhou, Bao an Cui, and Pu yan Chen, Function of PRRSV GP5 envelope protein by using pseudotyped virus. Veterinary Microbiology 2009.138: 297-303
[22] Shanmukhappa K, Kim JK, Kapil S. Role of CD151, A tetraspanin, in porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus infection. Virol J. 2007 Jun 16; 4: 62.
[23]何家田,王红霞,张学敏,魏开.膜蛋白质组分析技术的研究进展.[J], 2005, 29(6):584-587
[24] Wallin E.Von Heijne G. Genome-wide analysis of integral membrane proteins from eubacterial, archaean, and eukaryotic organisms[J].Protein Sci, 1998, 7(4):1029-1038.
[25] Stevens TJ, Arkin IT. Do more complex organisms have a greater proportion of membrane proteins in their genomes[J]. Proteins, 2000,39(4):417-420.
[26] Hopkins AL.Groom CR. The druggable genome [J]. Nat Rev Drug Discov, 2002, 1(9):727-730.
[27]俞利荣,等.蛋白质组研究技术及其进展.生命的化学,1998,18(6):4
[28] Santoni V, Molloy M, Rabilloud T. Membrane proteins and proteomics: un amour impossible [J] Electrophoresis, 2000,21(6):1054-1070.
[29] Bunai K.Nozaki M.Hamano M Proteomic analysis of acrylamide gel separated proteins immobilized on polyvinylidene difluoride membranes following proteolytic digestion in the presence of 80% acetonitrile [J].Proteomics, 2003,3(9):1738-1749.
[30] Ferro M. Salvi D.Riviere-Rolland H Integral membrane proteins of the chloroplast envelope: identification and subcellular localization of new transporters [J].Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2002,99(17):11487-11492.
[31] Ferro M.Seigneurin-Berny D.Rolland N Organic solvent extraction as a versatile procedure to identify hydrophobic chloroplast membrane proteins [J].Electrophoresis, 2000,21(16):3517-3526.
[32] Carboni L.Piubelli C.Righetti PG Proteomic analysis of rat brain tissue: comparison of protocols for two-dimensional gel electrophoresis analysis based on different solubilizing agents[J].Electrophoresis, 2002,23(24):4132-4141.
[33] Henningsen R.Gale BL.Straub KM Application of zwitterionic detergents to the solubilization of integral membrane proteins for two-dimensional gel electrophoresis and massspectrometry [J].Proteomics, 2002,2(11):1479-1488
[34] Babu GJ.Wheeler D.Alzate O Solubilization of membrane proteins for two-dimensional gel electrophoresis: identification of sarcoplasmic reticulum membrane proteins[J].Anal Biochem, 2004,325(1):121-125.
[35] Galeva N.Altermann M Comparison of one-dimensional and two-dimensional gel electrophoresis as a separation tool for proteomic analysis of rat liver microsomes:cytochromes P450 and other membrane proteins[J].Proteomics, 2002, 2(6):713-722.
[36] Simpson RJ.Connolly LM.Eddes JS Proteomic analysis of the human colon carcinoma cell line (LIM1215): development of a membrane protein database[J].Electrophoresis, 2000,21(9):1707-1732.
[37] Schagger H.von Jagow G Tricine-sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis for the separation of proteins in the range from 1 to 100 kDa [J].Anal Biochem, 1987, 166(2):368-379.
[38] Schagger H.P feiffer K The ratio of oxidative phosphorylation complexesⅠ-Ⅴin bovine heart mitochondria and the composition of respiratory chain supercomplexes [J].J Biol Chem, 2001, 276(41):37861-37867
[39] Devreese B.Vanrobaeys F.Smet J Mass spectrometric identification of mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation subunits separated by two-dimensional blue-native polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis [J]. Electrophoresis, 2002,23(15):2525-2533
[40] Brookes PS.Pinner A.Ramachandran A High throughput two-dimensional blue-native electrophoresis: a tool for functional proteomics of mitochondria and signaling complexes [J].Proteomics, 2002,2(8):969-677
[41] Bunai K.Ariga M.Inoue T Profiling and comprehensive expression analysis of ABC transporter solute-binding proteins of Bacillus subtilis membrane based on a proteomic approach[J].Electrophoresis, 2004,25(1):457-463
[42] Van Montfort BA.Canas B.Duurkens R Improved in-gel approaches to generate peptide maps of integral membrane proteins with matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry [J]. J Mass Spectrom, 2002, 37(3):322-330
[43] Van Montfort BA.Doeven MK.Canas B Combined in-gel tryptic digestion and CNBr cleavage for the generation of peptide maps of an integral membrane protein withMALDI-TOF mass spectrometry [J]. Biochem Biophys Acta, 2002, 1555(1-3):111-115
[44] Bunai K.Nozaki M.Hamano M Proteomic analysis of acrylamide gel separated proteins immobilized on polyvinylidene difluoride membranes following proteolytic digestion in the presence of 80% acetonitrile [J].Proteomics, 2003,3(9):1738-1749
[45] Bunai K.Yamane K Effectiveness and limitation of two-dimensional gel electrophoresis in bacterial membrane protein proteomics and perspectives [J]. J Chromatogr B Analyt Thechnol Biomed Life Sci, 2005,815 (1-2):227-236
[46]钱小红.蛋白质组与生物质谱技术.质谱学报,1998,19(3):48
[47]王京兰,等.蛋白质组研究中肽质量指纹谱鉴定方法的建立及应用.生物化学与生物物理学报,2000,32(4):373
[48] Pandey A, et al. Proteomics to study genes and genomes. Nature, 2000, 405(6788):837
[49] Mann M.Quantitative proteomics.Nature Biotechnol, 1999, 17(10):954
[50] Yates J R. Mass spectrometry and the age of the proteome [J].J. Mass Spectrom,1998,33:1-19
[51] Washburn MP.Wolters D.Yates JR 3rd Large-scale analysis of the yeast proteome by multidimensional protein identification technology [J].Nat Biotechnol, 2001,19 (3):242-247
[52] Brand M, Ranish J A, Kummer N T, et al. Dynamic changes in transcription factor complexes during erythroid differentiation revealed by quantitative proteomics. Nat Struct Mol Biol, 2004, 11(1):73~80
[53] Han DK.Eng J.Zhou H Quantitative profiling of differentiation-induced microsomal proteins using isotope-coded affinity tags and mass spectrometry [J].Nat Biotechnol,2001,19 (10):946-951.
[54] Zhou H.Ranish JA.Watts JD Quantitative proteome analysis by solid-phase isotope tagging and mass spectrometry [J].Nat Biotechnol, 2002, 20 (5):512-515.
[55] Blonder J.Goshe MB.Moore RJ Enrichment of integral membrane proteins for proteomic analysis using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry[J].J Proteome Res, 2002, 1(4):351-360.
[56] Goshe MB.Blonder J.Smith RD Affinity labeling of highly hydrophobic integral membrane proteins for proteome-wide analysis [J].J Proteome Res, 2003, 2(2):153-161.
[57] Wu CC.MacCoss MJ.Howell KE A method for the comprehensive proteomic analysis of membrane proteins: identification, modifications, and topology [J]. Nat Biotechnol, 2003, 21(5): 532-538.
[58] Cavanagh, D. 1997. Nidovirales: a new order comprising Coronaviridae and Arteriviridae. Arch. Virol. 142:629–633.
[59] Collins, J. E., D. A. Benfield, W. T. Christianson, L. Harris, J. C. Hennings,D. P. Shaw, S. M. Goyal, S. McCullough, R. B. Morrison, H. S. Joo, D.Gorcyca, and D. Chladek. 1992. Isolation of swine infertility and respiratory syndrome virus (isolate ATCC VR-2332) in North America and experimental reproduction of the disease in gnotobiotic pigs. J. Vet. Diagn. Investig.4:117–126.
[60] Terpstra, C., G. Wensvoort, and J. M. A. Pol. 1991. Experimental reproduction of porcine epidemic abortion and respiratory syndrome (mystery swine disease) by infection with Lelystad virus: Koch’s postulates fulfilled. Vet. Q.13:131–136.
[61]陈博文,孙颖杰,罗长保.PRRS的血清学检测及病毒的分离与鉴定[J].中国兽医杂志,1996,22(5):6.
[62]郭宝清,陈章水.哈兽研所首次证实国内猪群存在PRRSV感染[J]畜牧兽医科技信息,1996,01:8.
[63] Kegong Tian, Xiuling Yu, Tiezhu Zhao, Youjun Feng, Zhen Cao, et al. (2007)Emergence of Fatal PRRSV Variants: Unparalleled Outbreaks of Atypical PRRS in China and Molecular Dissection of the Unique Hallmark[J]. PLoS ONE. June 2007, Issue 6, e526, 1-10.
[64] Jeong-Ki Kim, Al-Majhdi Fahad, Kumar Shanmukhappa, et al. (2006) Defining the Cellular Target(s) of Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Virus Blocking Monoclonal Antibody 7G10[J]. JOURNAL OF VIROLOGY, Jan. 2006, p. 689–696
[65]黄伟坚,蒋小红,陈樱,等.猪繁殖与呼吸综合征病毒GXA株分离及主要结构基因的克隆和序列分析[J].畜牧与兽医,2006,38(8):8-11.
[66] Chen J, Liu T, Zhu C G. Genetic Variation of Chinese PRRSV Strains Basedon ORF5 Sequence [J]. Biochemical Genetics, 2006,(44) : 425-435.
[67] Gao Z Q, Guo X, Yang H G. Genomic characterization of two Chinese isolates of porcine resp iratory and rep roductive syndrome virus[ J ]. Arch Virol, 2004, 149: 341-1351.
[68] Yan WU Shuang-hui YIN et al. Genetic Variation Analyses of nsp2 Gene of PRRSV in Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region of China.2009. Virologica Sinica 24(3):221-226
[69] Gorman O T,Bean W J,Kawaoka Y,et a1.Evolution of the nucleoprotein gene of influenza virus[J].J Virol,1990,64:1487—1497
[70] Ewey C, Charbonneau G, Carman S ,et al . Lelystad-like strain of porcine reproductive andrespiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) identified in Canadian swine [J]. Can Vet J ,2000 ,41 (6) : 4932494.
[71] Benfield, D. A., E. Nelson, J. E. Collins, L. Harris, S. M. Goyal, D. Robinson, W. T. Christianson, R. B. Morrison, D. Gorcyca, and D. Chladek. 1992. Characterisation of swine infertility and respiratory syndrome (SIRS) virus(isolate ATCC VR-2332). J. Vet. Diagn. Investig. 4:127–133.
[72] Kim, H. S., J. Kwang, I. J. Yoon, H. S. Joo, and M. L. Frey. 1993. Enhanced replication of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome (PRRS) virus in a homogeneous subpopulation of MA-104 cell line. Arch. Virol. 133:477– 483.
[73] Wensvoort, G., E. P. de Kluyver, J. M. A. Pol, R. J. M. Moorman, M. M. Hulst, R. Bloemraad, A. den Besten, T. Zetstra, and C. Terpstra. 1992. Lelystad virus, the cause of porcine epidemic abortion and respiratory syndrome: a review of mystery swine disease research at Lelystad. Vet. Microbiol. 33:185–193
[74] Wensvoort, G., C. Terpstra, J. M. A. Pol, E. A. ter Laak, M. Bloemraad, E. P. de Kluyver, C. Kragten, L. van Buiten, A. den Besten, F. Wagenaar, J. M. Broekhuijsen, P. L. J. M. Moonen, T. Zetstra, E. A. de Boer, H. J. Tibben, M. F. de Jong, P. van’t Veld, G. J. R. Groenland, J. A. van Gennep, M. T. Voets, J. H. M. Verheijden, and J. Braamskamp. 1991. Mystery swine disease in the Netherlands: the isolation of the Lelystad virus. Vet. Q. 13:121–130.
[75] Kreutz, L. C., and M. R. Ackermann. 1996. Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus enters cells through a low pH-dependent endocytic pathway. Virus Res. 42:137–147.
[76] Nath, D., A. Hartnell, L. Happerfield, D. W. Miles, J. Burchell, J. Taylor- Papadimitriou, and P. R. Crocker. 1999. Macrophage-tumour cell interactions: identification of MUC1 on breast cancer cells as a potential counterreceptor for the macrophage-restricted receptor, sialoadhesin. Immunology 98:213–219.
[77] Hanash S. Disease proteomics [J]. Nature, 2003; 422:226–32.
[78] Ong SE, Foster LJ, Mann M. Mass spectrometric-based approaches in quantitative proteomics [J]. Methods, 2003, 29:124–130.
[79] Gr?nborg M, Kristiansen TZ, Iwahori A, et al. Biomarker discovery from pancreatic cancer secretome using a differential proteomic approach[J]. Mol. Cell Proteomics, 2006, 5, 157-171.
[80] Cameron L A, Footer M J, van Ondenaarden A, et al. Motility of ActA protein-coatedmicrospheres driven by actin polymerization [J] . Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 1999, 96(9): 4908- 4913.
[81] Bains N P, Gorbatyuk V Y, Nosworthy N J, et al. Backbone and side chain 1H, 15N, and 13C assignments for chick cofilin [J]. J Biomol NMR, 2002, 22(2) : 193- 194.
[82]宋慧娟,苏玉虹. CFL2基因研究进展[J ].中国农学通报(Song Hui2Juan ,Su Yu2Hong. Advances in the research of CFL2 gene [J ] .Chin Agric Sci Bull) ,2006 ,22(2) :28-30
[83] Ghosh M, Song X, Mouneimne G, et al . Cofilin promotes actin polymerization and defines the direction of cell motility [J ]. Science , 2004 ,304 (5671) :743-746
[84] Yamaquchi H , Lorenz M, Kempiak S , et al . Molecular mechanisms of invadopodium formation: the role of the N2WASP2Arp2P3 complex pathway and cofilin [J ] . J Cell Biol , 2005 , 168(3) :441-452
[85] Yamaquchi H , Condeelis J . Regulation of the actin cytoskeleton in cancer cell migration and invasion [J ] .Biochim Biophys Acta , 2007 , 1773(5) :642-652
[86] Yap C T, Simpson T I , Pratt T, et al . The motility of glioblastoma tumour cells is modulated by intracellular cofilin expression in a concentration dependent manner [J]. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton,2005 ,60(3) :153-165
[87] Crowley-Weber CL, Payne CM, Gleason-Guzman M, et al. Development and molecular characterization of HCT-116 cell lines resistant to the tumor promoter and multiple stress-inducer, deoxycholate. Carcinogenesis, 2002,23: 2063-2080.
[88] Chang XZ, Li DQ, Hou YF, et al. Identification of the functional role of peroxiredoxin 6 in the progression of breast cancer[J]. Breast Cancer Res. 2007, 9 (6): R76.
[89] Lincoln DT, Ali Emadi EM, Tonissen KF, et al. The thioredoxin–thioredoxin reductase system: over-expression in human cancer [J]. Anticancer Res. 2003, 23, 2425–2433.
[90] Pickart CM, EddinsM J. Ubiquitin: structures, functions, mechanisms [J]. Biochem BiophysActa, 2004, 1695: 55-72.
[91] Ronald N Harty,Melissa E. Rhabdoviruses and the cellular ubiquitin - p roteasome system: a budding interaction [J].Journal of Virology, 2001, 75: 10623～10629.
[92] Tsan MF,Gao B.Cytokine function of heat shock proteins[J].Am J Physiol Cell Physiol,2004,286(4):C739-744.
[93]樊建勇,杨慧兰,关蕾,等.热休克蛋白70.Ⅱ型单纯疱疹病毒糖蛋白D DNA疫苗的构建及表达[J].医学研究生学报,2007,20(4):349_352.
[94]叶苓,杨守京,刘彦仿.汉坦病毒感染诱导热休克蛋白70表达[J].中国病毒学,2000,15(2):106.110.
[95] Latchman DS.Heat shock proteins and cardiac protection[J].Cardiovasc Res。2001。5 1(4):637-646.
[96] Mayer MP,Bukan B.Hsp70 chaperones:cellular functions and molecular mechanism[J].Cell Mol Life$ci,2005,62(6):670-684.
[97] Barral JM,Broadley SA,Schaffar G,et a1.Roles of molecular chaperones in protein misfolding diseases[J].Semin Cell Dev Biol,2004,15(1):17-29.
[98] Landry J,Lambert H。Zhou M.Human HSP27 is phosphorylated at serines 78 and 82 by heat shock and mitogen—activated kinases that recognize the$anle amino acid motif as s6 Kinase II[J].J Biol Chem,1992,267(2):794-803.
[99] Kumaraguru U,Gouffon CA Jr,Ivey RA.Antigenic peptides tomplexed to phylogenically diverse Hsp70s induce differential immune responses[J].Cell Stress Chaperones,2003,8(2):134-143.
[100] Rossow KD. Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome. 1998.Vet Pathol 35:1-2.
[101] T. W. Molitor, E. M. Bautista and C. S. Choi, Immunity to PRRSV: Double-edged sword .1997. Veterinary Microbiology. 55 265-276
[102] Andrijana Rajic, DVM MS,Catherine E. Dewey, DVM, Production of PRRSV- negative pigs commingled from multiple, vaccinated, serologically stable, PRRSV- positive breeding herds J Swine Health Prod. 2001;9(4):179-184..
[103] Chiou M-T .An overview of PRRS in Taiwan. In the PRRS Compendium. 2003. Des Moines, Iowa : National Pork Board, pp. 281-283.
[104] Mayte C, Emilio C, Tomás U, et al. Modifications in the human T cell proteome induced by intracellular HIV-1 Tat protein expression. Proteomics, 2006, 6: 63?73.
[105] OsbornM. Vimentin. In: Guidebook to the cytoskeletal and motorp roteins [M]. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 1993. 169 -171.
[106] Fuchs E, Weber K. Intermediate filaments: structure, dynamics,function, and disease [J]. Annu Rev Biochem, 1994, 63: 345 -382.
[107] Clarke EJ, Allan V. Intermediate filaments: vimentin moves in [J]. Curr Biol, 2002, 12 (17) : R596 - R598.
[108] YoonM, Moir RD, Prahlad V, et al. Motile p roperties of vimentin intermediate filamentnetworks in living cells [J]. J Cell Biol, 1998, 143 (1) : 147 - 157.
[109] Martys JL, Ho CL, Liem RK, et al. Intermediate filaments in motion: observations of intermediate filaments in cells using green fluorescent p rotein-vimentin [J]. Mol Biol Cell, 1999, 10 (5) :1289 - 1295.
[110] Kim JK, Fahad AM, Shanmukhappa K, Kapil S. 2005.) Defining the cellular target(s) of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus blocking monoclonal antibody 7G10. J Virol 80:689–696.
[111] Turk V, Bode W. The cystatins: protein inhibitors of cysteine proteinases. Febs Letters, 1991, 285(2): 213-219.
[112] Ritonja A, Machleidt W, Barrett A J. Amino acid sequence of the intracellular cysteine proteinase inhibitor cystatin B from human liver. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 1985, 131:1187-1192.
[113] Hirai K, Yokoyama M, Asano G, Tanaka S. Expression of cathepsin B and cystatin C in human colorectal cancer. Human Pathology, 1999, 30: 680-686.
[114] Bervar A, Zajc I, Sever N, Katunuma N, Sloane B F, Lah T T. Invasiveness of transformed human breast epithelial cell lines is related to cathepsin B and inhibited by cysteine proteinase inhibitors. Biological Chemistry, 2003, 384: 447-455.
[115] Singh S,Sarlaeharan S,Sn S,et al.Overexpression of vimentin role in the invasive phenotype in an androgen-independent model of prostate cancer [J].Cancer Res 2003, 63 (9):2306-2311.
[116]侯铸,罗勇,赵佳晖,姜永光,商剑峰,陈东. EMT标记蛋白在前列腺癌组织中的表达及其意义[J].中国男科学杂志, 2009, (12) :21-24
[117]林勇,叶建新,林旭.波形蛋白表达与上皮源性肿瘤的关系[J].医学综述, 2010, (01) :50-52
[118] Byun Y, Chen F,Chang R,et al.Caspase cleavage of vimentin disrupts intermediate filaments and promotes apoptosis [J].Cell Death Differ, 2001, 8( 5): 443-450
[119] Yang Xwen, Wang Jianhua, Liu Cunren,et al.Cleavage of p53-vimentin complex enhances tumor necrosis factor related apoptosis inclucing ligand-mediated apoptosis of rheumatoid arthritis synovial fibroblasts[J].Am J Pathol,2005,167:705-719
[120]谢丽涛,顾熊飞.保护蛋白--种新型的抗氧化蛋白及其生物学功能.[J]广州医学院学报.1999,27(3):80-83
[121] H.Z. Chae et al., Characterization of three isoforms of mammalian peroxiredoxin that reduce peroxides in the presence of thioredoxin, Diabetes Res. Clin. Pract. 45 (1999), pp. 101–112.
[122] Yue HY, Cao J, Cui JF, Dai Z, Su JJ, Duan XX, Yang C, Yue HF, Li Y, Liu YK. The expression of peroxiredoxin II in hepatocellular carcinoma and its significance. Zhonghua Gan Zang Bing Za Zhi. 2007.15(5):366-9.
[123] S.W. Kang et al., Mammalian peroxiredoxin isoforms can reduce hydrogen peroxide generated in response to growth factors and tumor necrosis factor-alpha, J. Biol. Chem. 273 (1998), pp. 6297–6302
[124]刘永哲,于雷,孙世龙,杨湘山,武宁,鞠桂芝.电离辐射诱发小鼠胸腺淋巴瘤基因表达谱改变[J].中国公共卫生, 2010, (02) :222-223
[125] H.J. Kim,H.-Z. Chae,Y.-J. Kim,Y.H. Kim,T.-S. Hwang,E.-M. Park,Y.-M. Park. Preferential elevation of Prx I and Trx expression in lung cancer cells following hypoxia and in human lung cancer tissues [J] Cell Biology and Toxicology, 2003,19, (5) .