任务型教学法在高中英语阅读教学中的应用
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
在我国中学外语教学中,任务型教学备受关注。任务型语言教学旨在把语言教学过程真实化,使学生在有目的的交际活动中来学习和应用语言。任务型学习强调在“做中学”,通过学生参与活动、师生共同完成语言教学任务,使学生自然地习得语言,促进外语学习。
     本论文的目的是为了验证任务型教学法在高中英语阅读课上是有效的,可以提高学生的阅读兴趣和能力,使学生的学习方式从被动学习向自主,合作,探究式学习转变。为了证实这个论点,笔者在自己所教的两个平行班级-兰州市第三中学高一年级的两个班开展了为期四个月的实验,一个班为实验班,另一个为对照班。在实验班采取任务型教学模式,在对照班采取的则是传统的教学模式,并在实验结束时对实验班的学生进行了问卷调查。
     实验结果表明,与对照班的学生相比,实验班的学生在经过任务型阅读培训后,阅读理解能力提高较快,且强于对照班的学生。问卷调查结果也表明,任务型阅读教学的实施,减少了学生在英语阅读过程中对教师的依赖,在阅读课堂中,学生阅读更加主动而且对英语阅读的兴趣也更加浓厚,从而说明任务型教学方式在高中英语阅读课上的有效性。
     本论文主要包括五章。
     第一章介绍,阐述了本研究的背景、目的及意义。
     第二章是文献综述,介绍以往阅读课所用的方法及其局限性,任务的定义,任务型教学方法的理论基础等。
     第三章是本研究的实验设计,主要有两个部分,一是给实验班和控制班的同学进行了两次测试,分别为前测和后测;二是进行问卷调查,进一步了解任务型教学法对学生英语阅读水平的影响。
     第四章为数据处理部分,利用SPSS数据分析软件对前后测试数据进行了平均分统计和配对样本检验,证明了实验班和对照班在实验后英语阅读水平有了差异,即实验班的阅读得分高于对照班。
     第五章提出结论,指出任务型教学的优点及其存在的问题,并对今后继续开展这方面的研究提出建议。
Task-based language teaching (TBLT) has attracted attention of experts and English teachers in China. It emphasizes the importance of organizing a course around communicative tasks that learners need to do outside the classroom, and facilities learners to do tasks required in language use. The essence of task-based learning is a process of "learning by doing", in which learners engage in naturalistic learning through experiencing and exploring language.
     The purpose of this thesis is to prove that task-based teaching method is effective in English reading class in senior high school, and it can enhance the students' reading interest and ability, and change SEFC students' learning styles from passive reception to self-access, cooperation and exploration. In order to confirm the point, the author carried out an experiment in two classes in Senior Grade One in No.3 High School of Lanzhou, Gansu Province. One class is the experimental class; the other is the control class. Task-based teaching method was employed in the experimental class, and traditional teaching method was employed in the control class. The experiment lasted for four months. A questionnaire was made at the end of the experiment.
     Based upon the analysis of the data, the students in the experimental class who take task-based reading training make more remarkable progress in English reading comprehension ability compared to the control class. The result of the questionnaire also proves that task-based language teaching in English reading class is feasible and effective, in which the students are less dependent on the teacher, in English reading class, the students are more active and gain more interest in English reading.
     The whole paper is made up of five chapters.
     The first chapter is an introduction, which states the background, purpose and significance of this study.
     The second chapter is about literature review, with the models of reading process and their limitations, definitions of task, its rationales and so on.
     The third chapter deals with the experimental design of this study. The experiment consists mainly of two parts. First, two tests were given to the subjects both from the EC and the CC. Second, a questionnaire survey was done to see whether the task-based approach was more effective or not than the traditional approach.
     The fourth chapter is assigned to data processing. The statistic SPSS was used. The result verified that the students in the experimental class had a better reading level than the control class. The results offered persuasive evidence to the hypothesis.
     The fifth chapter comes up with the conclusion about the advantages and limitations of TBLT, and also suggestions for further studies are given too.
引文
Bloor, M. and T. Bloor. 1986. Language for Specific Purposes: Practice and Theory. Dublin: Trinity' College.
    
    Breen, M. 1987. Learner contributions to task design. In Candlin C. N. and D. F. Murphy (eds.).
    Brown, G. and G Yule. 1983. Teaching the spoken Language. Cambridge: CUP
    Bygate, M, P Skehan. and M. Swain. 2001. Researching Pedagogic Tasks. Essex: Pearson Education Limited.
    Carrell, P. I. and J. C. Eisterhold. 1983. Schema theory and ESL reading pedagogy. TESOL Quarterly, 17/4, 553-573.
    Collins, A. 1986. Integrating group work with medics materials. In Harper, D.(ed.). ESP for the University. pp. 121-132. Oxford: the British Council and Pergamon.
    
    Cowan, J. R. et al. 1979. English teaching in China: A recent survey. TESOL Quarterly, 13, 465-482.
    Crookes, G. 1986. Task Classification: A Cross-Disciplinary Review. Technical Report, No.4. Hawaii: University of Hawaii at Monoa.
    Doughty, C. and T. Pica. 1986. Information gap tasks: Do they facilitate second language acquisition? TESOL Quarterly , 20, 304-405.
    
    Ellis, R. 2000. Task-based Research and Language Pedagogy. Language Teaching Research, 4/3 , 193-220.
    Ellis, R. 2002. Understanding Second Language Acquisition. Shanghai: Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press.
    Foster, P. and P. Skehan. 1996. The influence of planning on task-based performance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18, 299-324.
    Fowler, W. S. 1985. New Proficiency English: Book Two Reading Comprehension. Edinburgh: Thomas Nelson & Sons Ltd.
    Goodman, K. S. 1967. Reading: a psycholinguistic guessing game. Journal of the Reading Specialist , 6/1,126-135.
    Goodman, K. S. 1973. Psycholinguistics universals in the reading process. In Smith, F. (ed.) Psycholinguistics and Reading, pp.21-27
    Goodman, K. S. 1975. The reading process. In Frederick, W. G (ed.) Language and Literacy: The Selected Writings of Kenneth Goodman, pp. 5-16. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
    Hutchinson, T. and A. Waters. 1987. English for Specific Purposes. Cambridge: Camgbridge University Press.
    
    Kennedy, C. and R. Bolitho. 1984. English for Specific Purposes. London: Macmillan.
    Lewis, M. 1996. Implications of a Lexical View of Language. In Willis, D and Willis (eds) Challenge and Change in Language Teaching.
    
    Littlewood, W. 1981. Communicative Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Long, M. H. 1983. Native Speaker/Non-native Speaker Conversation and the Negotiation of Meaning. Applied Linguistics, Vo 1.4.
    Long, M. H. 1985. A role for instruction in second language acquisition. In K. Hyltenstam and M. Pienemann (eds). Modelling and Assessing Second Language Acquisition. Clevedon Avon.: Multilingual Matters.
    Long, M. H. 1989. Task, group, and task-group interactions. University of Hawaii Working Papers in ESL 8/2,1-26.
    Long, M. H. and G. Crookes. 1992. Three approaches to task-based syllabus design. TESOL Quarterly, 26/1, 27-56.
    
    McDonough, J. 1984. ESP in Perspective: A Practical Guide. London and Glasgow: Collins.
    Murphy, D. and C. Candlin. 1993. Language Learning Tasks. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
    Nunan, D. 1989. Designing Tasks for the Communicative Classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge Univerisity Press.
    
    Nunan, D. 1991. Communicative tasks and the language curriculum. TESOL Quarterly, 25/2, 279-295.
    Nutall, C. 1996. Teaching Reading Skills in a Foreign Language. Oxford: Heinemann.
    Phillips, M. K. 1981. Toward a theory of LSP methodology. In Mackay, R. and J. D. Palmer (eds) Languages for Specific Purposes: Program Design and Evaluation, pp.92-105. Rowley, Mass: Newbury House.
    
    Piaget, J. 1972. The Principles of Genetic Epistemology. New York: Basic Books.
    Prabhu, N. 1987. Second Language Pedagogy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Rumelhart, D. E. 1980. Schemata: The building blocks of cognition. In Spiro, R. J. et al. (eds.) Theoretical Issues in Reading Comprehension, pp. 33-58. Hillsdale, N. J.: Lawrence Erlbamn Associates.
    Skehan, P. 1996. A framework for the implementation of task-based instruction. Applied Linguistics, 17/1, 17-62.
    Smith, F. 1971.Understanding Reading. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
    Smith,F.1973.Decoding:The great fallacy.In Smith F.(ed.).Psycholinguistics and Reading.p.82.New York:Holt,Rinehart & Winston.
    Smith,F.1978.Reading.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
    Swaffeer,J.,K.Arens.and M.Morgan.1982.Teacher classroom practices:Redefining method as task hierarchy.Modern Language Journal,66,24-33.
    Swain,M.1985.Communicative Competence:Some Roles of Comprehensible Input and Comprehensible Output in its Development.New York:Newbury House.
    Swain,M.1995.Three Functions of Output in Second Language Learning:In Principle and Practice in Applied Linguistics.Oxford:Oxford University Press.
    Vygotsky,L.S.1978.Mind in Society:The Development of Higher Psychological Processes.Cambridge:Harvard University Press.
    Widdowson,H.G 1979.The process and purpose of reading.In Widdowson,H.G(ed).Exploration in Applied Linguistics.pp.173-181.Oxford:Oxford University Press.
    Wilkins,D.A.1981.Notional syllabus revisited.Applied Linguistics,2,87.
    Willis,J.1996.A Framework for Task-based Learning.Edinburgh,England:Longman.
    Wilson,J.1986.General principles.In Harper,D.(ed.).ESSP for the University.pp.7-26.London:Oxford University Press.
    蔡兰珍,2001,“任务教学法”在大学中的应用,《外语界》第四期,41-46。
    曹立芳,2003,任务型课堂教学活动初探,《中小学教材教学》第16期,31-33。
    陈瑛,2001,主体参与英语阅读教学过程的研究,《中小学外语教学》第2期,1-5。
    程可拉,刘津开,2003,《中学英语任务型教学理念与教学示例》,广州:华南理工大学出版社。
    付韶光,2004,高中英语阅读教学中的创新思维方式,《山东师范大学外国语学院学报》第一期,57-58。
    龚亚夫,罗少茜,2003,《任务型语言教学》,北京:人民教育出版社。
    胡春洞,1996,《英语学习论》,南宁:广西教育出版社。
    黄远振,2003,《新课程英语教与学》,福州:福建教育出版社。
    李春兰,1998,对高中学生所喜欢的教学方法的调查,《中小学外语教学》第6期,13-15。
    廖晓青,2001,任务型教学的理论基础和课堂实践,《中小学外语教学》第11期,10-120。
    卢莉,2002,初中英语任务型教学实验研究,《中小学外语教学》第3期,6-11。
    鲁子问,2002,任务型教学的课堂教学程序探讨,《中小学外语教学》第2期,12-13。
    鲁子问,2003,《中小学英语真实任务教学实践》,北京:外语教学与研究出版社。
    宋秋前,2001,课堂教学问题问诊与矫治,《教育研究》第四期,47-51。
    王才仁,1998,《英语教学交际论》,南宁:广两教育出版社。
    文秋芳,2001,《应用语言学研究方法与论文写作》,北京:外语教学与研究出版社。
    夏纪梅、孔宪辉,1998,“难题教学法”与“任务教学法”的理论依据及其模式比较,《外国语》第4期,34-40。
    阎婕,2002,高中英语任务型教学的课堂实践,《中小学外语教学》第8期,14-17。
    岳守国,2002,任务语言教学法:概要、理据及运用,《外语教学与研究》第5期,364-67。
    张海青,2002,关于“任务学习法”在外语教学中的几个问题,《课程·教材·教法》第一期,39-41。
    中华人民共和国教育部,2001,英语课程标准,北京:北京师范大学出版社。