对称型与非对称型胫骨假体对胫骨假端覆盖率的对照研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
目的:探索全膝关节置换术中对称型与非对称型胫骨假体对胫骨断面及胫骨端面前内象限覆盖率的差别。
     材料与方法:本实验选用胫骨平台标本30个,其中20个来自我科全膝关节置换术中切取的标本,10个尸体干标本。选用3种类型的胫骨假体进行比较,其中Genesis Ⅱ型胫骨假体为非对称型,I-BⅡ、PFC胫骨假体为对称型。
     胫骨截骨选用髓外定位系统。截骨厚度6-10mm。胫骨断面后倾6度。为每个胫骨断面从三种胫骨假体中分别选择一个能最大覆盖断面的假体。保持相同的放大率,摄取胫骨断面及与之相对应的胫骨假体的数码相片。将数码相片输入计算机,计算出胫骨假体占胫骨断面的百分比。用透明硬质塑料板将胫骨断面及与之相对应的胫骨假体制成模板,分别从胫骨断面模板和假体模板上用黑笔画出前内象限,再摄取数码相片,将相片输入计算机,计算出假体前内象限的百分比。用配对t检验的方法,检验非对称型假体和对称型假体对胫骨断面及断面前内侧覆盖率的差异性。
     结果:通过计算机分析Genesis Ⅱ假体对胫骨断面的覆盖率是88.41±1.94%;PFC假体对胫骨断面的覆盖率是83.21±3.28%;I-BⅡ假体对胫骨断面的覆盖率是79.81±3.86%。通过配对t检验,
    
     天津医科大学硕士论文
    Genesis 11假体对胫骨断面的覆盖率与PFC相比,p<0.001,Genesis
    11与I一Bll相比,p<0.05。
    GenesiSH假体对胫骨断面前内象限的覆盖率是82.09士n.42%;
    PFC假体对胫骨断面前内象限的覆盖率是50.81士8.23ry0;I一BH假
    体对胫骨断面前内象限的覆盖率是75.04士13.66%。通过配对t
    检验,GenesiS 11假体对胫骨断面前内象限的覆盖率与PFC相比,
    p<0.05,Genesis 11与I一B 11相比,p<0.001。
     结论:非对称型胫骨假体对胫骨近端截骨面的覆盖率明显高
    于对称型胫骨假体。非对称型胫骨假体对胫骨近端截骨面前内象
    限的覆盖率明显高于对称型胫骨假体。
Objective:To explore the difference of coverage rate at which the resected proximal tibia and anteomedial quadrant of it are covered by a symmetric prothesis and a asymmetric one in the course of total knee arthroplasty.
    Matherials and methods :We select 30 tibial plateau specimens in the trial,of them,20 specimens are the resected tibial plateau ones from total knee arthroplasties in our operating room, 10 specimens are dry cadaver tibial plateau ones.Three kinds of tibial prothesis are compared .Of them ,Genesis II tibial prothesis is asymmetric ,I-B II ,PFC tibial prothesis are symmetric.
    The tibial plateau is resected by extramedullary guide,all the resection specimens have a measured thickness of 6-10mm,the resection surface posteriorly slope by 6?.For each tibial specimen,we select one tibial prothesis respectively that can covered tibial plateau by the highest rate from three kinds of prothesis.The tibial specimen and the related prothesis are photographed digitally by the same gratifying rate.The digital photoes are sent to computer,the rate at which the tibial specimen is covered by the tibial prothesis is
    
    
    calculated.Exact templates of tibial section and tray basplates are produced with transparency plastic sheet. The anteomedial quadrants are landmarked with black pencil on the templates of resections and tray basplates, the digital photoes are taken .The digital photoes are sent to computer,the coverage rate at which the anteomedial quadrant of the tibial section is covered by the anteomedial quadrant of the tibial tray.With the paired-t test method, test the difference of coverage rate at which the resected proximal tibia and anteomedial quadrant of it are covered by a symmetric prothesis and a asymmetric one in the course of total knee arthroplasty.
    Resultrby the analysis of computer ,the average coverage rate of Genesis II tray to the resected specimens is 88.41 + 1.94%; that of PFC tray is 83.21+ 3.28%;that of I-B IItray is 79.81?.86% .By paired -t test ,the coverage rate of Genesis II tray to the resected specimens is compared to that of PFC tray(P<0.001).The coverage rate of Genesis II tray to that of I-B IItray(P<0.05).The coverage rate of Genesis II tray to the anteomedial quadrant of resected specimens is 82.09+11.42%, that of PFC tray to the anteomedial quadrant of resected specimens is 80.81 + 8.23%, that of I-B II tray to anteomedial quadrant of resected specimens is 75.04?3.66%. By
    
    paired -t test ,the coverage rate of Genesis II tray to the anteomedial quadrant resected specimens is compared to that of PFC tray(P<0.001).The coverage rate of Genesis II tray to that of I-B II tray(P<0.05).
    Conclusion: the coverage rate at which the resected proximal tibia and anteomedial quadrant of it are covered by a asymmetric prothesis is much higher than that of a symmetric prothesis.
引文
1.吕厚山主编 人工关节外科学 科学出版社
    2. Geoffrey H. Westrich, Marc A. Agulnick, Richard S. Laskin, Sreven B. Haas, Thomas P. Sculco. Current analysis of tibial coverage in total knee arthroplasty
    3. Geoffrey H. Westrich, MD; Resection specimen analysis of tibial coverage in total knee arthroplasty, Clin Orthop 309: 163-175 1994
    4. Stephen J. Incavo, MD, Tibial plateau coverage in total knee arthroplasty, Clin Orthop 299: 81-85 1994
    5. Ritter, Merrill A. MD: Montgomery, Thomas J. MD: The clinical significance of proximal tibial resection level in total knee arthroplasty, Knee 360: 174-181 1999
    6. Stulberg BN, Dombrowski RM, Computed tomography analysis of proximal tibial coverage. Clin Orthop. 311: 148-156 1995
    7. Mikulak, Stephen A. MD; Mahoney, Ormoned M. MD. Loosening and osteolysis with the press-fit condylar posterior-cruciate-substituting total knee replacement
    
    J Bone Joint Surg Am. 83: 398-403 2001
    8. Dalury, David F. MD Observation of the proximal tibia in total knee arthroplasty Clin Orthop 389: 150-155 2001
    9.范为民 王青等 人工关节松动病因的研究 中华骨科杂志1998.9pp518-521
    10. Wasielewski, Ray C. MS, MD The Causes of Insert Backside Wear in Total Knee Arthroplasty Clin Orthop 404: 232-246 2002
    11. RAO, ANAND R. BS; ENGH, GERARD A. MD; COLLIER, MATTHEW B. MS; LOUNICI, AMAIN MS Tibial interface wear in retried total knee components and correlations with modular insert motion J Bone Joint Surg Am. 84-A(10): 1849-1855 2002
    12. Callaghan, John J. MD; O' Rourke, Michael R. MD; Goetz, Devon D. MD; Schmalzried, Thomas P. MD; Campbell, Patricia A. PhD; Johnston, Richard C. MD. Tibial post impingement in posterior-stabilized total knee arthtoplasty Clin Orthop 404: 83-88 2002
    13. Edwards, S. A. Frcs; Pandit, H.G. Analysis of polyethylene thickness of tibial components in total knee replacement J Bone Joint Surg(Br) 84: 369-371 2002
    
    
    14.吕厚山 袁燕林等 1202个人工膝关节置换术的临床特点分析 中华骨科杂志 2001.12:710-713
    15. Bindeglass. DF. Cohen JL Dorr LD. Current principles of design of cemented knees Tech Orthop 1991; 6: 80-85
    16.李为,新加坡人工膝关节的现状 中华骨科杂志 1998.12:202
    17. Agliet P, Buzzi R. Posteriorly stabilized total condylar knee replacement J Bone Joint Surg(Br) 1998. 70: 211-216
    18. Charnley J. Low friction arthroplasty of the hip Theory and Practice Berlin:Springer, 1979. 3-15
    19. Gruen TA; Meneice GM, Amstutz HC. Models of failure of cemented stem type femoral components. Clin Orthop; 1979 141: 17-27
    20. Horikoshi M, Macaulay W Booth RE. et al. Comparation of interface membiances obtained from failed cemented and cementless hip and knee protheses. Clin Orthop 1994 309: 69-87
    21. Shanbhag AS, Jacols JJ, Glant TT, et al. Comparation and morphology of wear debris in failed uncemented total hip
    
    replacement J Bone Joint Surg(Br), 1994, 76: 60-67
    22. Chiba J, Rubash HE, Kim KJ, et al. The characterization of cytokines in the interface tissue obtained from failed cementless total hip arthtoplasty with and without femoral osteolysis Clin Orthop, 1994, 300: 304-312
    23. Stevenson JC. New techniques in metabolic bone disease. London: Wright 1990. 105-121
    24. Bertolin: DR, Nedwin GE, Bringman IS. Stimulation of bone resorption and inhibition of bone formation in Vitro by human turmour necrosis facties. Nature, 1986. 319: 516-518
    25. Dorr, Lawrence D. MD Contrary View: Wear is not an Issue Clin Orthop 404: 96-99 2002
    26. Engh GA, Dwyer KA, Habes CK: Polyethylene wear of metal-backed tibial components in total and unicompartmental knee prostheses. J Bone Surg 74B: 9-17, 1992
    27. Engh GA, Kirakewucz LM, Pereles TR: Clinical results of modular polyethylene insert exchange with retention of total knee arthroplasty compoents. J Bone Joint Surg 82A: 516-523, 2000.
    
    
    28. Engh GA, Parks NL, Ammeen DJ: Tibial osteolysis in cementless total knee arthroplasty: Arevies of 25 cases treated with and without tibial component revision. Clin orthop 309: 33-43, 1994