DHS、DCS与PFN内固定治疗老年性股骨粗隆间骨折的临床研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
目的:探讨动力髋部螺钉(Dinamic Hip Screw,DHS)和动力髁部螺钉(Dinamic Condyle Screw,DCS)以及股骨近端髓内钉(Proximal Femoral Nail,PFN)治疗股骨粗隆间部骨折的适应症及其临床疗效。资料与方法:1.一般资料:对我院2004.8~2006.3收治的老年性股骨粗隆间骨折患者,随机抽取38例,均为行走摔伤,有17例合并有内科杂病,合并有冠心病者5例,高血压者6例,糖尿病者4例,既有冠心病又有高血压者2例。其中,DHS内固定治疗者19例,男6例,女13例;年龄61—83岁,平均72岁。此组均为Evans分类第一类骨折(其中,Ⅱ型2例,ⅢA型9例,ⅢB型6例,Ⅳ型2例)。DCS内固定者12例,男4例,女8例,平均年龄75岁,此组均为Evans分类第二类骨折,即逆粗隆间骨折。PFN治疗7例,男2例,女5例,平均年龄74岁,均为粗隆间粉碎骨折。结果:1.所有病例均获6个月~2年的随访,平均随访1年半。三组病人中有37例于术后3~6个月拍片复查达骨性愈合,关节活动度好,无髋内翻畸形及股骨头缺血性坏死等并发症发生;其中1例,于术后2年因心脏病死亡,但于术后1年拍片示,骨折已骨性愈合。2.DHS内固定组平均手术时间90分钟,术中平均出血量435ml,术中平均输血量485ml,术后平均愈合时间12.6月;DCS内固定组平均手术时间85分钟,术中平均出血量440ml,术中平均输血量466ml,术后平均愈合时间13.1月;PFN内固定组平均手术时间55分钟,术中平均出血量65ml,术中均未输血,术后平均愈合时间11.9月。结论:1.DHS、DCS和PFN内固定治疗老年性股骨粗隆间骨折均可获得满意疗效,但应严格掌握手术适应症,术中根据其特点采取相应的处理,围手术期应积极预防以减少并发症的发生。2.DHS、DCS在手术时间,术中失血量,术中输血量,术后并发症的发生率以及术后骨折愈合时间上无明显差异;PFN与上述两组在术后并发症的发生率和术后骨折愈合时间上无明显差异,但在手术时间,术中失血量,术中输血量上存在明显差异。3.DHS、DCS和PFN三组在内固定术后1年左右均达骨性愈合,Harris髋关节功能评分均达优良,在统计学上无明显差异(P>0.05)。
Backgroud: Most intertrochanteric fracture occure in eldly inviduals. The incidence of intertrochanteric fracture is increasing, not unexpectedly, since the general life expectancy of the population has increased significantly during the last few decades. Operative treatment can decrease complication and motality rate and the paient can recover early. DHS、 DCS and PFN are ideal implants for treatment of intertrochanteric fracture at present. Objective: To study the effects and indications of dinamic hip screw (DHS) , dynamic condyle screw (DCS) and proximal femoral nail, (PFN) for treatment of senile femoral intertrochanteric fracture. Materials and Methods: Tirty eightcases with femoral intertrochanteric fracture. From 2004.9 to 2006.3 in our hospital were divided to three groups according to different indications. All patients were treated surgically, nineteen with DHS , twelve with DCS and seven with PFN. Result: All the patients were followed up from six months to two years, the healing time and the function of the hip joint after operation of DHS 、 DCS and PFN were no obvipus difference. Conclusion: 1.The senile patients with femoral intertrochanteric fracture need surgically treatment. DHS , DCS and PFN can be good methods to the intertrochanteric fractures in the eldly, but the operation indication should be chosen strictly 2.The operation time, blood transfusion,the bleed quantity in operation,complications and the healing time of fracture of DHS and DCS were no obvipus difference; PFN has no obvipus difference in complication and the healing time of fracture with DHS and DCS, but has obvious diference in operation time, blood transfusion,and the bleed quantity in operation.3.The Harris Hip Score(HHS) have no difference after a year of operation with DHS, DCS and PFN.
引文
[1] 胥少汀,葛宝丰,徐印坎.实用骨科学,第3版,北京:人民军医出版社,2005,708
    [2] 王亦璁主编.骨与关节损伤.第3版,北京:人民卫生出版社,2002.865
    [3] Simmermacher RK, Bosch AM, vander werkin C. The AO/ASIF-proximal femoral nail(PFN): a new device for the treatment of unstable proximal femoral fractures. Injury,1999: 30:327-332
    [4] 鲁英,罗先正.203例股骨粗隆间骨折治疗分析,骨与关节损伤杂志,1991,C7-8
    [5] 戴魁戎主译.现代骨科学.第1版,北京:科学技术文献出版社,2002,389.
    [6] 卢世壁,董天华等.髋关节外科学 第1版 郑州大学出版社,2005,259
    [7] 王满宜,贾国胜,安贵生等,股骨近端髓内针(PFN)治疗转子部骨折 中华创伤骨科杂志,2004(2)6
    [8] 危杰,股骨转子间骨折,中华创伤骨科杂志,2004;6(5)554-557.
    [9] Buchuner DM, Koepsell TD, Abrass IB. Chronic illness as a risk factor for hip factor for hip fracture: results of a case-control study and review of the literature. In: Apple DF Jr, Wilson C ed, Prevention of Falls and Hip Fracture in the Elderly. Rosemont IL, American. Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 1994. 8-9.
    [10] 毛宾尧.髋关节外科学,北京:人民卫生出版社,1998.216-219
    [11] 郭世绂,钟世镇等等,骨科临床解剖学,山东科学技术出版社.2002 713~714
    [12] Horwitz BG. Retrospective randomized comparison of the DHS and Gamma locking nail. J Bone Joint Surg. 1993;75:789.
    [13] 董书雄,殷圣银,陈仁春DHS治疗股骨粗隆间骨折56例赣南医学院学报2203(2)23
    [14] 毕荣修 DHS内固定治疗高龄股骨粗隆间骨折96例报告 中国中西医结合外科杂志 2003.8(9)
    [15] 朱通伯,戴魁戎.骨科手术学北京:人民卫生出版社,1999 321-322
    [16] ridle SH, Patel AD, Bircher M, et al. Fixation of intertrochaneric fracture of the femar:a randomised Prospectice comparison of the Gammanail and dynamic hip screw. J Bone Joint Surg(Br), 1991; 73:330
    [17] 刘安庆,张银光,等.股骨转子间骨折的治疗及生物力学研究,中国矫形外科杂志,2000.9(7)
    [18] 姜丹青,股骨粗隆间骨折的手术治疗 中国医师杂志 2003(2)5
    [19] 周雪峰,马华松,等.动力螺钉治疗股骨粗隆部骨折的并发症及其坊治[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2004,12(8):631-632
    [20] Larsson S Trochanteric fractures Clin Orthop, 1990 , 259 : 130~133.
    [21] 肖元洪,郑卫星等.PFN治疗股骨粗隆周围骨折的应用体会中国矫形外科杂志,2005.9(13)
    [22] Simmermacher RK. Bosch AM. van der Werken C. The AO/ASIF-proximal femoral nail(PFN): a new device for the treatment of unstable proximal femoral fractures. Injury, 1999, 30: 327~332.
    [23] 莫子丹,梁国保等.滑动加压鹅头钉治疗股骨粗隆间骨折[J].中国矫形外科杂志,1999,6(5):331.
    [24] 刘岩,祝运利.AO动力髁螺钉在股骨粗隆间骨折中的应用[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2002,9(2):114.
    [25] Koval K,J, Zuckerman JD. Intertrochanteric fractures. In: Bu-cholz RW. Heckman JD, eds. Rockwood and Green's fractures in adults. 5th ed Philadelphia Lippincou Williams&Wilkins. 2001. 1635~1663.
    [26] 卢世壁,董天华等.髋关节外科学,郑州大学出版社,2005,260
    [27] 王澍寰 临床骨科学 上海科学技术出版社,2005,01:616~618
    [1] 毛宾尧.髋关节外科学,北京:人民卫生出版社,1998.216-219
    [2] 王亦璁主编.骨与关节损伤.第3版,北京:人民卫生出版社,2002.865
    [3] 胥少汀,葛宝丰,徐印坎.实用骨科学一第2版,北京,人民军医出版社.1999.677-678
    [4] 危杰,股骨转子间骨折,中华创伤骨科杂志,2004;6(5)554-557.
    [5] Buchuner DM, Koepsell TD, Abrass IB. Chronic illness as a risk factor for hip factor for hip fracture: results of a case-control study and review of the literature. In: Apple DF Jr, Wilson C ed, Prevention of Falls and Hip Fracture in the Elderly. Rosemont IL, American. Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 1994. 8-9.
    [6] Mullerler ME, Nazarian S, Koch P. The Comprehensive Classification of Fractures of the Long Bones. New York, Springer-Yerlag, 1990.118.
    [7] Horwitz BG. Retrospective randomized comparison of the DHS and Gamma locking nail. J Bone Joint Surg. 1993;75:789.
    [8] 范为民等,四种股骨转子间骨折内固定物的力学对比及疗效评价,中华骨科杂志 1996 16(4)229—231
    [9] 荣国威译 骨科内固定(第三版),北京,人民卫生出版社 1995.367
    [10] 袁宏,等.95度髁钢板与Richard钉治疗老年转子间骨折.骨与关节损伤,2000,15(4):305—306
    [11] 吴阶平,裘法祖.黄家驷外科学,第四版,北京,人民卫生出版社 1986:1945
    [12] 周建伟,等.Gamma钉与滑动式鹅头钉的生物力学分析及临床疗效.中华骨科杂志,1996;16(4):225-227
    [13] 李斯明,等.加锁做内钉治疗股骨转子间骨折生物力学分析及临床疗效.中华骨科杂志,1996;16(4):225-227
    [14] 韩一生,等.Gamma钉治疗股骨粗隆间骨折20例初步报告.骨与关节损伤杂志,1994;9(3):161-162
    [15] ridle SH, Patel AD, Bircher M, et al. Fixation of intertrochaneric fracture of the femar:a randomised Prospectice comparison of the Cammx nail and dynamic hip screw. J Bone Joint Surg(Br), 1991; 73:330
    [16] Tardis TC. stress analysis of the femur, J Biomech, 1969; 1: 163
    [17] 梁伟国,等.改良Gamma钉手术治疗股骨转子周围部骨折.中华骨科杂志,1995:15(80;512-514
    [18] 冯华.Camma钉治疗不德定粗隆部骨折.创伤骨科杂志,1994:2(3):160-161
    [19] Overgaard S, Soballe k; Polyethylene wear, osteolysis and acetabular loosening with an HA-coated hip prosthesis. Bone and Joint Surg. 2000;82(2):305.
    [20] Hull RD, Raskob GE. Prophylaxis of venous thromboembolic disease following hip and knee surgery. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1986 68-A:146—150
    [21] 戴魁戎主译.现代骨科学.第1版,北京:科学技术文献出版社,2002,389.
    [22] 纪方,等.人工假体置换治疗高龄老年人不稳定股骨粗隆间骨折.骨与关节损伤杂志,2002,17(3):184-185.
    [23] 毛宾尧,陆勇等.人工股骨头置换治疗高龄股骨转子间骨折,中华创伤骨科杂志.2004 6(9):1053-1055
    [24] 合润基,等.股骨转子间骨折压缩外固定支架的生物力学研究与应用.中华骨科杂志,1994:14(10):586-588
    [25] 于仲嘉,等.单侧多功能外固定支架的临床应用(附2524例报告).中华骨科志,1996;16(4):211-214.
    [26] Davis TRC, Sher JL, HorsmanA, Simpson M, Porter BB, CheckeLLs RG. Intertrochannic femoral fractures. Mechanical failure after internal fixation. J Bone Joint Surge (Br) 1990, 72: 26-31.