基于确定性定位分析的车身三维偏差模型及求解方法研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
  • 英文题名:The Research of 3D Variation Modeling and Analysis Based on Deterministic Analysis in Auto-Body Assembly
  • 作者:曹俊
  • 论文级别:博士
  • 学科专业名称:车辆工程
  • 学位年度:2008
  • 导师:来新民 ; Wayne Cai
  • 学科代码:080204
  • 学位授予单位:上海交通大学
  • 论文提交日期:2008-06-01
摘要
轿车车身的尺寸偏差直接影响到整车外观、行驶风噪声、关门效果甚至整车平顺性,车身尺寸偏差大小不仅依赖车身制造过程控制,而且取决于车身设计阶段的工艺设计。因此,车身装配偏差分析与公差设计方法研究具有重要意义。然而,车身装配过程中零件间的多约束特征和多装配顺序影响,使得车身装配偏差累积规律十分复杂,传统尺寸链分析方法需要建立尺寸链方程,难以适应车身三维偏差分析;同时,传统的蒙特卡洛求解方法计算效率低下,难以应用于这种复杂车身产品的公差综合。为此,本文开展面向车身装配的三维偏差模型及求解方法研究,旨在提高车身公差设计水平。
     本文首先针对车身装配多约束特征及多装配顺序的特点,建立基于确定性定位分析的车身装配三维偏差模型;然后,研究偏差模型线性化求解方法和基于矩方法的二次化求解方法;最后,以三维偏差建模和求解方法作为核心算法,开发复杂车身装配三维公差分析系统,并应用于实例。主要研究工作及创新点如下:
     (1)基于确定性定位分析的车身三维偏差模型
     传统的尺寸链模型需要建立尺寸链,难以应用于车身产品这种多约束、多装配顺序的装配偏差分析过程。本文提出一种新的车身装配三维偏差模型建模方法。该模型首先将车身装配多约束条件转化为确定性约束定位条件,根据给定的装配顺序将装配过程分解为一系列单个零件的确定性定位;然后,以零件偏差、夹具偏差的耦合偏差为输入,建立考虑定位点二阶几何信息的零件确定性定位分析模型。最后采用一系列确定性定位分析建立车身装配偏差分析模型。
     (2)三维偏差模型的线性化求解方法
     传统的蒙特卡洛仿真计算效率低,难以应用于复杂车身装配公差设计这样需求大量迭代运算的场合,本文提出一种高效率的线性化求解方法。首先,对于非线性隐式模型,采用隐式求导和一阶泰勒级数展开得到确定性定位分析模型的输入输出间线性关系。然后,利用数理统计理论,建立输入输出统计参数的显式表达式,实现装配公差的线性化求解;最后,通过与蒙特卡洛方法的比较,验证了线性化方法的有效性和计算效率。该方法无需解大量非线性方程组,计算效率显著提高;
     (3)三维偏差模型的二次化求解方法
     线性方法只能应用于装配偏差模型非线性程度较低的场合,针对模型较强非线性或零件尺寸为非正态分布的场合,本文进一步提出基于矩方法的确定性定位分析模型的二次化求解方法。首先,对确定性定位分析模型进行二次泰勒级数展开,采用有限差分法与牛顿-拉尔森法得到一阶、二阶及二阶混合敏感度矩阵;然后,根据零件偏差的前四阶矩计算零件定位偏差的均值和标准差,并分析了二次化方法的计算精度和效率;最后,通过与线性方法及蒙特卡洛方法的对比验证方法的有效性。该方法可应用于非线性模型或非正态分布输入,可对非线性隐式模型进行敏感度分析。
     (4)三维偏差分析软件系统开发
     以三维偏差模型及求解方法为核心算法,采用Visual C++为开发工具,开发车身三维复杂装配偏差分析系统AVAS。系统采用基于功能的三层式结构,分别为算法层,数据层和用户层。采用车大灯安装和车门安装两个典型实例对系统及核心算法进行验证,将分析结果分别与三坐标实测数据及3DCS分析结果进行对比分析。系统具有如下特点:不依赖于其他CAD软件;可选择线性化方法或二次化求解方法进行公差分析,与采用蒙特卡洛相比效率更高;可在同一模型中计算多条装配顺序而无需重新建模。
The dimensional variation of auto-body has a direct effect on appearance, wind noise, shutdown of door and so on. The dimensional variation of auto-body not only depend on manufacturing process control, but also on the the process design. So it has great significance about the research of the variation analsysi of auto-body assembly. However, the characteristics that the multiple constraints and sequences in the auto-body assembly make the error stack-up very complex and it is difficult to search dimension-loop by utilizing the traditional dimension loop model in the 3-D variation analysis and synthesis in auto-body. Meanwhile, for the auto-body composed by great mounts of parts, the traditional Monte Carlo Simulation is time-consuming. So, the 3-D variation modeling and analysis is developed for auto-body assembly to raise the tolerance design of auto-body in this paper.
     According to the characteristic of multiple constraits and sequence, a 3-D assembly variation model based on deterministic locating is presented firstly; then the linearized and quadratic analysis method of the 3-D variation model is developed; finally based on the variation model and analysis method, a software prototype of 3-D variation analysis in auto-body is developed. The main research work and method are as follows:
     (1) The auto-body assembly has the characteristics of the multiple constraints and sequences, it is difficult to search dimension-loop by utilizing the traditional dimension loop model for the 3-D variation analysis。
     The deformation of auto-body assembly is very small and it can be consider as rigid body. A new 3-D variation model is presented in this paper, the hierarchical assembly process is decomposed to a series of deterministic locating of single part in this model. Firstly, the multiple constraints is transferred to deterministic locating; then the part variation and jig variation is taken as input to develop the model of deterministic locating by considering the quadratic geometry of constraints.
     (2) The linearized method of 3-D variation model
     Because the traditional Monte Carlo simulation is time-consuming, and can not be applied to tolerance synthesis, a linearized method is presented in this paper. At first, for nonlinear assembly function, the implicit differentiation and multi-variables Tayler Series Expansion are used to obtain the linear relationship between input and output. Then the stability and computational complexity are investigated to determint is application range. Finally this method is applied in case study to compare to Monte Carlo simulation. The presented method is efficient by avoiding resolving nonlinear equations, and in general applications, the relationship between input and output of assembly function is linear and closely linear, the linearized method can obtain enough accuracy.
     (3) The quadratic method of 3-D variation model
     In case that the assembly function is nonlinear, or the part dimension is not follow Gaussion distribution (for example, the position tolerance of hole can be consider as Rayley distribution), the application of Method of Moments in the nonlinear implicit assembly function is presented.
     Firstly the nonlinear implicit function is expanded by 2nd Taylor Series Expansion, and the finite differential method and Newton-Raphson method are utilized to obtain the 1st order, 2nd order and 2nd order mixed sensitivity matrix, then the mean, variance, skewness and kurtosis of part dimension are take as input to obtain the mean and variance of assembly diemension; and then the accuracy and computational complexity are investigated; finally it is compared to linearized method and Monte Carlo Simulation. The application of Method of Moments in the nolinear implicit function is a general method, and can be further extended to other fields, such as finite element analysis.
     (4) The development of 3D tolerance analysis software
     Based on the presented variation model and analysis method, by using C++, a 3D tolerance analysis software for auto-body assembly, AVAS, is developed and this software has applied for registration. The system adopts a functional 3-hierarchical structure: the data layer, algorithm layer and user layer. The Headlamp assembly and Auto-door assembly are utilized to validate the AVAS system and the core algorithm, the results is compared to the meament data and 3DCS software. It has the followed merits: independent with other exist CAD software; AVAS can choose linearized method in tolerance analysis to obtain higher efficiency as compared to the Monte Carlo Simulation; AVAS can deal with two or more assembly sequence in one model.
引文
[1] S. J. Hu, Stream-of-Variation Theory for Automotive Body Assembly, Annals of the CIRP, 1997, 46(1): 1~6.
    [2]林忠钦,连军,倪军,来新民,陈关龙,基于小样本的车身装配尺寸质量动态高精度评价方法,2001 Vol.37 No.11 P.62-65。
    [3]庄明惠,汽车制造2mm工程的实施方法,中国质量,2004,1:74-77。
    [4] Variation reduction for assembly: methodologies and case studies analysis, Technical Report of the“2 mm”Program, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, 1994.
    [5]林忠钦,汽车车身制造质量控制技术,机械工业出版社,2004。
    [6] Lin Zhongqin, Cai Wayne. Automotive Body Joining and Assembly: Introduction. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, MED, 2002,13:175.
    [7] Leaney, P.G. & R. Marshall, 1998. The Manufacturing Challenge for Automotive Designers. In: J. Happian-Smith, ed. Fundamentals of Modern Vehicle Design. London: Edward Arnold, TBP circa 2000.
    [8] Ceglarek D, SHI J. Design Evaluation of Sheet Metal Joints for Dimensional Integrity. Transactions of the ASME, Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, 1998,120(2):452~460.
    [9] Herbert B. Voelcker. The current state of affairs in dimensional tolerancing:1997. Integrated Manufacturing, 1998, 9(4):205-217.
    [10] Shaw C. Feng et al. A review of current geometric tolerancing theories and inspection data analysis algorithms. NISTIR 4509, National Institute of Standards and Technology, USA,1991.
    [11] A.A.G. Requicha. Toward a theory of geometric tolerancing. International Journal of Robotics Research, 1983, 2(4):45-60.
    [12] Srinivasan V., Geometric Tolerancing I: Virtural Boundary Requirement. IBM Journal of Research Development. 1989,33(2) :90-104.
    [13] Srinivasan V., Geometric Tolerancing II: Conditional Tolerance. IBM Journal of Research Development. 1989, 33(2) :105-122.
    [14]吴昭同,杨将新,蔡敏,基于数学定义的圆柱要素形状公差数学模型的研究,机械工程学报,2003年12期。
    [15]蔡敏,杨将新,吴昭同,平面要素公差数学定义理论及应用的研究,中国机械工程,2002年02期。
    [16]刘玉生,高曙明,吴昭同,杨将新,一种基于数学定义的三维公差语义表示方法,中国机械工程,2003年03期。
    [17]茅健,曹衍龙,杨将新,徐旭松,基于公差原则的圆柱特征位置度公差数学模型研究,计量学报,2006年z1期。
    [18] L.E. Farmer and C.A. Gladman. Tolerance technology—Computer-based analysis. Annals of the CIRP. 1986, 35(1):7-10.
    [19] Hoffmann, P. , 1982, "Analysis of tolerances and process inaccuracies in discrete part manufacturing," Comput. Aided Design, 2 (14), 83-88.
    [20] Turner, J., and M. Wozny (1987), "Tolerances in Computer-Aided Geometric Design," The Visual Computer, no. 3, pp.214-226.
    [21] ASME Standard 1994, "Dimensioning and Tolerancing," ASME Y14.5M-1994, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York.
    [22] Wirtz, A. (1988), "Vectorial Tolerancing," Tech. Paper CH 9470, New-Technikum Buchs, Gallen, Switzerland.
    [23] Marler, Jaren D., 1988,“Nonlinear Tolerance Analysis Using the Direct Linearization Method,”M.S. Thesis, Mechanical Engineering Department, Brigham Young University.
    [24] Chun, Ki S., 1988,“Development of Two-Dimensional Tolerance Modeling Methods for CAD Systems,”M.S. Thesis, Mechanical Engineering Department, Brigham Young University.
    [25] Larsen, G. C., 1991,“A Generalized Approach to Kinematic Modeling for Tolerance Analysis of Mechanical Assemblies,”M.S. Thesis, Mechanical Engineering Department, Brigham Young University.
    [26] Trego, A., 1993,“A Comprehensive System for Modeling Variation in Mechanical Assemblies,”M.S. Thesis, Mechanical Engineering Department, Brigham Young University.
    [27] Greenwood, W. H. and Chase, K. W. 1987,“A New Tolerance Analysis Method for Designers and Manufacturers,”ASME Journal of Engineering for Industry, 109, pp.112-116.
    [28] Greenwood, W.H. and K.W. Chase, 1988,“Worst Case Tolerance Analysis with Non-linear Problems,”ASME Journal of Engineering for Industry, Vol. 110, No. 3, pp. 232-235.
    [29] Chase, K. W., Gao, J., and Magleby, 1995, S. P.,“General 2-D Tolerance Analysis of Mechanical Assemblies with Small Kinematic Adjustments,”J. of Design and Manufacture, v 5, pp. 263-274.
    [30] Gao J. Chase K. Magleby S. Generalized 3-D Tolerance Analysis of Mechanical assemblies with Small Kinematic Adjustments. IIE Transactions 30:367~377.
    [31] Chase, K. W., and Trego, A., 1994,“AutoCATS--Computer-Aided Tolerancing System, 2-D Modeling User Guide,”ADCATS publication, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT.
    [32] Gao, J., Chase, K. W., and S. P. Magleby, "Comparison of Assembly Tolerance Analysis by the Direct Linearization and Modified Monte Carlo Simulation Methods," Proc. of the ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences, Boston, MA, 1995, pp. 353-360.
    [33] Chase, K. W., J. Gao, S. P. Magleby and C. D. Sorenson, 1996, "Including Geometric Feature Variations in Tolerance Analysis of Mechanical Assemblies", IIE Transactions, v28, pp. 795-807.
    [34] Chase Kenneth W, Magleby Spencer P. A Comprehensive System for Computer-Aided Tolerance Analysis of 2-D and 3-D Mechanical Assemblies[C]. Proceedings of the 5th International Seminar on Computer-Aided Tolerancing, Toronto,Canada,April 27-29, 1997.
    [35] Garrett, R. and A. Hall, Jr. (1969), "Effect of Tolerance and Clearance inLinkage Design," J. of Engineering for Industry, ASME, v 91, pp.198-202, Feb.
    [36] Dhande, S. and J. Chakraborty (1973), "Analysis and Synthesis of Mechanical Error in Linkages-A Stochastic Approach," J. of Engineering for Industry, ASME, v 105, pp. 672-676.
    [37] Agarwal, M. (1981), "Optimal Synthesis of Tolerance and Clearance in Function Generating Mechanisms-A Parametric Programming Problem," ASME Paper No. 81-DET-5.
    [38] Baumgarton, J. and K. Van der Werff (1985), "A Probabilistic Study Relating to Tolerancing and Path Generation Error," J. of Mechanism and Machine Theory, v 20 n 1, pp.71-76.
    [39] Schade, R. (1982), "A Probabilistic Model of Four-Bar Mechanisms," ASME Paper No. 82-DET-43.
    [40] Mallik, A. and S. Dhande (1987), "Analysis and Synthesis of Mechanical Error in Path-Generating Linkages Using a Stochastic Approach," J. of Mechanism and Machine Theory, v 22 n 2, pp.115-123.
    [41] Fu, J., W. Cleghorn and R. Fenton (1987), "Synthesis of Dimensional Tolerances of a Slider Crank Mechanism," 10th Applied Mechanisms Conference, Oklahoma State University.
    [42] Schade, R. (1980), "Probabilistic Models in Computer Automated Slider-Crank Function Generator Design," ASME Paper No. 80-DET-48.
    [43] Fenton, R., W. Cleghorn and J. Fu (1989), "Allocation of Dimensional Tolerances for Multiple Loop Assemblies," J. of Mechanisms, Transmissions, and Automation in Design, v 111, pp.465-470, Dec.
    [44] Dhande, S. and J. Chakraborty (1973), "Analysis and Synthesis of Mechanical Error in Linkages-A Stochastic Approach," J. of Engineering for Industry, ASME, v 105, pp. 672-676.
    [45] Beohar, S. and A. Rao (1980), "Optimum Stochastic Synthesis of Four Bar Spatial Function Generators," ASME Paper No. 80-DET-32.
    [46] Rao, S., and S. Gavane (1980), "Analysis and Synthesis of Mechanical Error in Cam-Follower Systems," ASME Paper No. 80-DET-22.
    [47] Faerber, P., J., 1999, Tolerance Analysis of Assemblies Using Kinematically Derived Sensitivities, MS thesis.
    [48] Lakshminarayana, K., 1978,“Mechanics of Form Closure,”American Society of Mechanical Engineers (Paper), no. 78-DET-32.
    [49] Asada H, Kitagawa M. Kinematic analysis and planning for form closure grasps by robotics hand [J]. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 1989, 5(3) :293-325.
    [50] Nguyen and Van-Duc, 1987,“Constructing Force-Closure Grasps in 3d,”IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Raleigh, NC, USA, pp. 240-245.
    [51] Nguyen and Van-Duc, CONSTRUCTING STABLE FORCE-CLOSURE GRASPS, 1986 Proceedings - Fall Joint Computer Conference., Dallas, TX, USA.
    [52] Asada, H. and By, A. B., 1985,“Kinematic Analysis of Workpiece Fixturing forFlexible Assembly with Automatically Reconfigurable Fixtures,”IEEE Journal of Robotics and Automation, RA-1(2), pp. 86-94.
    [53] Chou, Y-C., Chandru, V., and Barash, M. M., 1989,“A Mathematical Approach to Automatic Configuration of Machining Fixtures: Analysis and Synthesis,”ASME Journal of Engineering For Industry, 111, pp. 299-306.
    [54] DeMeter, E. C., 1994,“Restraint Analysis of Fixtures which Rely on Surface Contact,”ASME Journal of Engineering for Industry, 116(2), pp. 207-215.
    [55] Sayeed, Q.A., and DeMeter, E.C., 1994,“Machining Fixture Design and Analysis Software,”International Journal of Production Research, 32(7), pp. 1655-1674.
    [56] Weill, R., Darel, I., and Laloum, M., 1991,“The Influence of Fixture Positioning Errors on the Geometric Accuracy of Mechanical Parts,”Proceedings of CIRP Conference on PE & MS, pp. 215-225.
    [57] Cai, W., Hu, S. J., and Yuan, J. X., 1997,“A Variational Method of Robust Fixture Configuration Design for 3-D Workpieces,”ASME Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, 119(4), pp. 593-602.
    [58] Cai, W., 2005,“Robust Pin Layout Design For Sheet Metal Locating”, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, to appear.
    [59] Carlson, J. S., 2001,“Quadratic Sensitivity Analysis of Fixtures and Locating Schemes for Rigid Parts,”ASME Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, 123(3), pp. 462-472.
    [60] Wang, M. Y., Liu T., and Pelinescu D. M., 2003,“Fixture Kinematic Analysis Based on the Full Contact Model of Rigid Bodies,”ASME Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, 125(2), pp. 316-324.
    [61] Liu, T., and Wang, M. Y., 2003,“An Approximate Quadratic Analysis of Fixture Locating Schemes,”Proceedings of Automation, September 12-14, National Chung Cheng University, Chia-Yi, Taiwan.
    [62] Shawki, G. S. A., and Abdel-Aal, M.M., 1965,“Effect of Fixture Rigidity and Wear on Dimensional Accuracy,”International Journal of Machine Tool Design and Research, 5, pp. 183-202.
    [63] Menassa, R. J., and DeVries, W. R., 1988,“Optimization Methods Applied to Selecting Support Positions in Fixture Design,”Proceedings of the USA-Japan Symposium on Flexible Automation - Crossing Bridges: Advances in Flexible Automation and Robotics, pp. 475-482.
    [64] Cai, W., Hu, S. J., and Yuan, J. X., 1996,“Deformable Sheet Metal Fixturing: Principles, Algorithms and Simulations,”ASME Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, 118(3), pp. 318-324.
    [65] Camelio, J., Hu, S.J., Ceglarek, D., 2004,“Impact of Fixture Design on Sheet Metal Assembly Variation,”Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 23(3), pp. 182-193.
    [66] Liao, Y. J., S. J. Hu, 2001, An integrated model of a fixture-workpiece system for surface quality prediction, International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, v 17, n 11, p 810-818.
    [67] Greenwood, W. H. and K. W. Chase (1988), "Worst Case Tolerance Analysiswith Nonlinear Problems," J. of Engineering for Industry, ASME, v 110, pp.232-235, Aug.
    [68] Parkinson, D. B. (1982), "The Application of Reliability Methods to Tolerancing," J. of Mechanical Design, v 104, pp. 612-618, July.
    [69] Parkinson, D. B. (1985.), "Assessment and Optimization of Dimensional Tolerances," Computer-Aided Design, vol. 17, No. 4, pp. 191-199, May.
    [70] Lee, W. and T. C. Woo (1990), "Tolerances: Their Analysis and Synthesis," J. of Engineering for Industry, v 112, pp. 113-121, May.
    [71] Shapiro, S. S., Gross A. J., 1981, Statistical Modeling Techniques, Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York.
    [72] Cox, N. D., 1984,“Volume 11: How to Perform Statistical Tolerance Analysis,”American Society for Quality Control, Statistical Division.
    [73] Grossman, D. (1976), "Monte Carlo Simulation of Tolerancing in Discrete Parts Manufacture," Stanford Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Memo AIM-280, Computer Science Dept. Report No.STAN-CS-76-555, May.
    [74] DeDoncker, D. and A. Spencer (1987), "Assembly Tolerance Analysis with Simulation and Optimization Techniques," SAE Paper No. 870263.
    [75] Craig, M. (1989), "Managing Variation by Design Using Simulation Methods," Failure Prevention and Reliability - 1989, ASME Publ. No. DE-Vol 16, pp. 153-163.
    [76] Doepker, P. E. and D. Nies (1989), "Designing Brake Components Using Variation Simulation Modeling," Failure Prevention and Reliability - 1989, ASME Publ. No. DE-Vol 16, pp. 131-138.
    [77] Early, R. and J. Thompson (1989), "Variation Simulation Modeling-Variation Analysis Using Monte Carlo Simulation," Failure Prevention and Reliability - 1989, ASME Publ. No. DEVol16, pp. 139-144
    [78]郝利霞,王国伟,郭长虹,计算机辅助离散公差优化设计的实现,航空制造技术,2005年06期。
    [79]王太勇,熊越东,路世忠,郭晓军,蒙特卡洛仿真法在尺寸及公差设计中的应用,农业机械学报,2005年05期。
    [80] Chase, K. W., and Parkinson, A. R., 1991,“A Survey of Research in the Application of Tolerance Analysis to the Design of Mechanical Assemblies,”Research in Engineering Design, 3, pp. 23-37.
    [81] Glancy, C. G., 1994,“A Second-Order Method for Assembly Tolerance Analysis,”Master Thesis, Brigham Young University.
    [82] Haug, E. J., 1989, Intermediate Dynamics, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.
    [83] Marler J D. Nonlinear Tolerance Analysis Using the Direct Linearizating Method. M. S. Thesis, Mechanical Engineering Department, Brigham Young University. 1988
    [84] Evans D H. Statistical Tolerances: the State of the Art. Journal of Quality Technology. 1975, 7(1)
    [85] Hasofer A M and Lind N C. Exact and Invariant Second-Moment Code Format. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, ASCE. 1974, 100(1)
    [86]洪昌华、龚晓南。相关情况下Hasofer-Lind可靠度指标的求解。岩土力学。2000, 21(1)。
    [87] Taguchi G. System of Experimental Design. UNIPUB/KRAUS International Publications, New York
    [88] Taguchi, G.(1986), Introduction to Quality Engineering, Asian Productivity Organization.
    [89] Kackar, R., (1986),“The Power of Taguchi Methods,”Quality Progress, pp. 21-29, Dec.
    [90] Byrne, D. and S. Taguchi, (1987),“The Taguchi Approach to Parameter Design,”QualityProgress, pp. 19-26, Dec.
    [91] Taguchi, G., E. Elsayed and T. Hsiang, (1989),Quality Engineering in Production Systems,McGraw-Hill.
    [92]周恺,蔡颖,张振家,李湘媛,稳健设计理论在公差分析中的应用,北京理工大学学报,2003年23卷5期,557-560。
    [93]芮执元,梁建华,王鹏,基于尺寸容差的虚拟装配公差优化设计,机械制造与自动化,2006年04期。
    [94]于永利、朱小冬、张柳。离散事件系统模拟。北京航空航天大学出版社,北京,2003。
    [95] Bai zhang, Jun Ni, Adaptive Product, Process and Tooling Design Strategy for Optimal Dimensional Quality of Automotive Body Assemblies, Journal of manufacturing science and engineering, 2003, vol. 125, no4, pp. 835-843.
    [96] De Fazio T L,Whitney D E.Simplified generation of all mechanical assembly sequence.IEEE Trans.Robotics and Automn,1987,3(6):640~658.
    [97] Tolerance Analysis with EDS/VisVSA, Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering, 2003.
    [98] 3DCS Analyst, ? 1999 Dimensional Control Systems, Inc.
    [99] http://www.eds.com/products/plm/teamcenter/vis/VisVSA/
    [100] http://www.eds.com/products/plm/teamcenter/vis/VisVSA/tour.shtml
    [101] Cai, W., A New Tolerance Modeling and Analysis Methodology through A Two-Step Linearization with Applications in Automotive Body Assembly, accepted by Journal of Manufacturing Systems.
    [102] Burden, Richard L., Faires, J. Douglas, Numerical Analysis Fifth Edition, PWS Publishing Co., 1993.
    [103] LAPACK Users' Guide Third Edition UPDATED: 22 Aug 1999 ,http://www.netlib.org/lapack/lug/index.html.
    [104] Chase, K. W., and Parkinson, A. R., 1991,“A Survey of Research in the Application of Tolerance Analysis to the Design of Mechanical Assemblies,”Research in Engineering Design, 3, pp. 23-37.
    [105] Hines, W. W. and Montgomery, D. C., 1980, Probability and Statistics in Engineering and Management Science, 2nd Edition, John Wiley & Sons.
    [106]李庆扬,1999,非线性方程组的数值解法,科学出版社。
    [107]张荣瑞,尺寸链理论及其应用[M],北京:机械工业出版社,1986。
    [108] Matlab Help, ? 1994-2006 The MathWorks, Inc.
    [109] W Cai, Fixture optimization for sheet panel assembly considering weldinggun variations, Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science, DOI: 10.1243/09544062JMES457.