基于贝叶斯网络的轨道交通系统人因可靠性定量分析方法研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
轨道交通不仅为人们的生活提供了极大的便利,而且还是国民经济发展的大动脉。轨道交通在发挥着其巨大作用的同时,各种各样的交通事故却屡见不鲜。最大可能地保证系统的安全性成为摆在轨道交通系统相关人员面前一个巨大的挑战。调查发现,在已查明原因的轨道交通事故中,至少有一半以上的事故直接或间接地与人的活动有关。随着硬件水平的不断完善,人成为轨道交通系统安全最重要的贡献者,对人的可靠性的分析也成为系统安全评价中不可缺少的一部分。
     论文针对轨道交通系统自身的情况,研究了轨道交通系统中不同参与者相关的人的因素。鉴于现有常用人因可靠性分析方法的不足,以及贝叶斯网络在处理人的推理方面的优势,提出使用贝叶斯网络建立人的可靠性定量分析模型。由于人和机器是一个有机的整体,对人的可靠性的研究不能脱离系统独立进行,因此本文研究人的行为过程以人和测控系统的相互依赖为前提。另外,人与机器最大的不同就是人具有能动性,因而本文人的可靠性研究的重点就是对人的认知、决策过程的研究。最后使用本文提出的基于贝叶斯网络的人的可靠性分析模型,对轨道交通系统司机的人因可靠性进行了定量分析,并对比分析了设备、环境等因素对司机表现的影响。
     根据论文所建立的司机的可靠性定量分析模型,为轨道交通系统中的安全评价提供了便利;而且通过定量分析不同因素对人的可靠性的影响,为轨道交通系统人机界面的设计、人员配置管理等活动提供了依据,尤其提出了一直难以解决的驾驶室报警数量和先后顺序设置的解决方案。
Rail transit plays a huge important role not only in life, but also in national economy. However, accidents resulted from railway never disappear when people are enjoying convenience. There is so much to do for system safety assuring as far as possible. Survey found that among identified rail transit accidents, at least half part were related to human activities directly or indirectly. With hardware perfected constantly, human are becoming the most significant contributor to system safety, and HRA (human reliability assessment) have been an indispensable part of safety assessment.
     Based on self-situation of railway, human factors related to major participants are analyzed in this document. In condition of shortcomings of current HRA methods and advantage of Bayesian network in human interfere, HRA model based on Bayesian network is established. For human and machine are of an organic whole, interrelationship between human and measurement and control system are considered as precondition of HRA model based on Bayesian network, rather than analyzing operators alone. In addition, the principle difference between human and machine is human agency, thus, key of established model is modeling of human's situation assessment, especially human cognition processing. Take driver for example, quantitative HRA and analysis on effect factors are accomplished as well. In the last place, driver's HRA of rail transit system is analyzed based on Bayesian network mode established in this document, and influencing factors, such as devices and environment, impact on human performance is compared here as well.
     The built HRA model makes safety assessment of rail transit more correct and objective. Besides of human reliability assessment, the model can be applied for man-machine interface design, stuffing, training and so on, particularly for solution of warning arranging in cab.
引文
[1]张力等.复杂人机系统中的人因失误[J].中国安全科学学报,1996,6(6):35-37.
    [2]陈国华.风险工程学[M].国防工业出版社,2007.
    [3]王文斌.层次分析法在铁路安全管理中的应用.科技创新导报,2008,20:78-80.
    [4]于保国,王新泉等.安全人机工程学[M].北京:机械工业出版社,2007.
    [5]Martin Maguire.Method to Support Human-centred Design[J].Human-Computer Studies.2001,55,587-634.
    [6]何旭洪,黄祥瑞.工业系统中人的可靠性分析[M].清华大学出版社,2007.
    [7]Understanding human factors[R].RSSB,2008,6.
    [8]凌晓熙.人为因素对航空安全影响的研究[D].四川:西南交通大学硕士学位论文,2005.
    [9]刘燕子,张力,王以群.复杂系统中人误原因因素的层次分析法.安全与环境学报,2005,5(5):39-42.
    [10]Jens Rasmussen.Skills, Rules, and Knowledge; Signals, Signs, and Symbols, and Other Distinctions in Human Performance Models[C].IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics,1983.13(3).
    [11]张力.概率安全评价中人因可靠性分析技术研究[D].湖南:湖南大学博士学位论文,2004.
    [12]Kyung S. Park, Jae in lee. A new method for estimating human error probabilities: AHP-SLIM[J]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 93 (2008) 578-587.
    [13]Rail-specific HRA Tool for Driving Tasks[R]. RSSB,2005.
    [14]Melissa T. Baysari.Understanding the Human Factor Contribution to Railway Accident and Incident in Australia[J].Accident Analysis and Prevention.2008,40(17):50-57.
    [15]Nancy. Safeware.
    [16]Steve S horrock.The Two-fold Path to Human Error Analysis:TRACEr lite Retrospection and Prediction[J].Safety System,2002,11(3).
    [17]格拉斯A维格曼.斯科特A夏佩尔.马锐.飞行事故人的失误分析:人的因素分析与分类系统[M].中国民航出版社,2006.
    [18]周刚.人的安全行为模式分析与评价研究[D].青岛:山东科技大学硕士学位论文,2006.
    [19]张力等WANO人因事件统计及分析.核动力工程,2005,26(3),291-295.
    [20]John Wiley, Sons, Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics[M]北京:清华大学出版社,2006.
    [21]A.isaac, S.T,shorrowngck, R.kennedy, Barry kirwan, H.andersen, T.bove. technical review of human performance models and taxonomies of human error in ATM (HERA),2002,4.
    [22]黄曙东等.人因失误根本原因分析方法与应用[J].人类工效学,2003,9(1):31-34.
    [23]黄曙东等.核电厂人因事故预防的定量化决策[J].中国安全科学学报,2006,16(6):12-15.
    [24]戴立操等.复杂工业系统中人因失误根本原因分析[J].中国安全科学学报,2003,13(11):13-16.
    [25]J.Kingsyon-Howlett. Event and Causal Factors Analysis[J].Technical Research and Analysis Center,1995.
    [26]戴立操等.组织人因失误分析[J].中国安全科学学报,2004,14(9):20-23.
    [27]Steven T.Shorrck. Development and Application of a Human Error Identification Tool for Air Traffic Control[J]. Applied ergonomics 33(2002) 319-336.
    [28]Les.Chamber.A.Hazard Analysis of Human Factors in Safety Critical System[J].Engineering,2006,55:27-41.
    [29]张力等.人因可靠性分析方法[J].中国安全科学学报,2001,11(3):6-15.
    [30]刘正江.船舶避碰过程中的人的可靠性分析[D].大连:大连海事大学博士学位论文,2004.
    [31]胡笑旋.贝叶斯网建模技术及其在决策中的应用[D].安徽:合肥工业大学博士学位论文,2006.
    [32]李凯.贝叶斯法在医学诊断中的应用[J].北京大学学报,2010,42(3):360-362.
    [33]周君宝,周经伦,孙权.考虑人因的面向对象贝叶斯网络概率安全评估模型.核动力工程,2007,28(3):107-111.
    [34]尹晓伟,钱文学,谢里阳.基于贝叶斯网络的系统可靠性共因失效模型.中国机械工程,2009,20(1)
    [35]阎晨光等.基于贝叶斯网络的HRA研究在舰船PSA中的应用[J].江苏科技大学学报,2009,23(5):377-382.
    [36]刘莉等.基于贝叶斯网络的飞行安全人因可靠性评估模型[J].空军工程大学学报,2009,10(3):5-9.
    [37]N.Hatakeya and K.Furuta. Bayesian Network Modeling of Operator's Intent Inference[C]. IEEE 7th Human Factor Meeting, Scottsdale Arizona,2002.
    [38]周忠宝.基于贝叶斯网络的概率安全评估方法及应用研究[D].湖南:国防科技大学博士学位论文.2006.
    [39]周君宝,周经伦,金光,董豆豆.基于贝叶斯网络的概率安全评价研究.系统工程学报,2006,21(6):637-643.
    [40]Man Chelo Kim, A Computational Method of Probabilistic Safety Assessment of I&C and Human Operators in Nuclear Power Plants[J]. Reliability Engineering and Safety System 91 (2006)580-593.
    [41]Johan Ivansson. Situation Assessment in a Stochastic Environment using Bayesian Networks[D]. Department of Electrical Engineering Linkoping University,2002.
    [42]Adam X Miao.A Computational Situation Assessment Model for Nuclear Power Plant Operations[J]. System and Human 1997,27(6):728-742.
    [43]Man Chelo Kim,An Analytic Model for Situation Assessment of Nuclear Power Plant Operators Based on Bayesian Inference[J]. Reliability Engineering and Safety System 91 (2006)270-282.
    [44]Driver Error Data Collection Project:Final Report[R]. RSSB,2004.
    [45]Jussi K Vaurio. Human Factors and Risk in a Periodic Safety Review of a Nuclear Power Plant[C].Human Factors and Power Plant and HPRCT 13th Annual Meeting,2007 IEEE 8th:110-117.