胶焊接头在碰撞载荷下失效的模拟方法研究及其应用
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
部件的连接对整车的碰撞安全性和车身刚度有着至关重要的影响。胶焊技术作为一种新的连接方式,已经在汽车车身装配中得到越来越多的应用。但迄今为止,尚没有一种胶焊接头的有限元模型能够满足整车耐撞性分析的要求。本论文的目标是建立能够准确预报胶焊接头在碰撞载荷下变形和失效的模拟方法,并利用其分析胶焊接头中胶层与点焊的交互作用以及各设计参数对胶焊结构承载能力的影响,从而为胶焊车身结构的设计提供帮助。
     胶焊结构可以认为是胶粘和点焊的累加,论文分别开发了胶粘接头和点焊接头的有限元模型,再将两者结合用以模拟胶焊接头。为了能够在整车耐撞性分析中模拟胶层的变形和失效,论文首先基于不同应变率下的胶粘剂材料拉伸试验数据,提出了可以表征胶粘剂应变率相关性的弹塑性材料模型,并建立了胶粘接头的有限元模型。胶层的失效参数通过准静态和动态下的简单结构件试验来确定。论文分别针对点焊接头的脆性和韧性失效模式,建立了点焊接头有限元模型,采用有限元软件LS-DYNA中的MAT_SPOTWELD_DA材料模型来预报焊核的失效,采用Gurson材料模型来模拟母材的失效。论文将胶粘接头模型以及点焊接头模型相结合来模拟胶焊接头,并通过胶焊剥离试验、搭接试验以及胶焊连接的直管轴向压溃试验对该模拟方法进行了验证。结果表明,所建立的胶焊接头模型能够准确预报胶焊连接结构的变形和失效,其计算效率和模拟精度均满足整车耐撞性分析的要求。
     论文通过对胶焊简单结构件的模拟,研究了母材厚度、母材强度以及胶层厚度对胶层失效的影响,考察了点焊对于胶焊接头中胶层失效的止裂作用,并分析了胶层对点焊失效模式的影响。通过对胶焊连接的复杂结构件的模拟,讨论了引入胶层后,焊点数量对于结构承载能力的影响。论文以胶焊结构的轴向压溃、结构的三点弯曲以及T型构件的冲击为例,考察了各设计参数如胶层厚度、胶粘剂材料、母材厚度、母材材料等对结构承载能力的影响。在研究结果的基础上,对点焊连接的汽车前纵梁和胶焊连接的B柱进行了轻量化设计,达到了在保持结构承载能力的前提下减轻车身质量的目的。
Joining is crticial to vehicle crashworthiness and stiffness. As a new joining technology, weld-bonding is becoming increasingly common in the automotive industry. Toughed adhesives have become available and they significantly enhance bonding performance in vehicle bodies. However, due to the complexity of the combined use of toughed adhesive, spot weld and high strength steel, it is challenging to predict deformation and failure behavior of weld-bonded vehicle body structures under impact loading. The objective of this study is to develop an efficient modeling technique for crash analyses of weld-bonded vehicle body structures.
     In this thesis, the modeling of weld-bonding is based on the no-coupling effect between spot-weld response and adhesive-bond response, revealed in a previous study. Firstly, a simplified finite element model was established for modeling of the toughened adhesive-bonded joint. To better predict the impact response of the adhesive, a user defined material model was developed for adhesive, in which the strain rate effect of both the pre-failure material properties and the failure criterion is characterized. The input failure parameters were identified with simulations of adhesive-bonded coupon tests. Then simplified models of spot-welded joint were developed for the nugget failure mode and pull-out failure mode, respectively. In the former case, the spot weld was represented by a single solid element, and the material model of MAT_SPOTWELD_DA in LS-DYNA is used to characterize its behavior. In the latter case, the failure of base steel was predicted by the Gurson model. The Gurson parameters were optimized from modeling several different test types of the base steel. The combination of the finite element models of the adhesive-bond and the spot-weld were used to simulate the weld-bonding. The developed model was used in the simulations of weld-bonded coach-peel, lap-shear and tube axial impact tests, serving as validation of the characterization capability and computational efficiency of the modeling techniques.
     Based on the modeling of weld-bonded coupons, the influence of steel gage, metal grade and adhesive thickness on the failure of adhesive was studied, the crack-arresting effect of spot weld to the failure of adhesive was investigated, and the impact on the spot weld failure mode due to the involvement of adhesive was analyzed. Then the weld pitch effect was studied by modeling weld-boned structures. The simulations of weld-boned tubes under axial impact loading and impact bending, and weld-boned T-joints under impact loading were performed with different design variables, e.g., steel gage, steel type, adhesive thickness, adhesive type, to investigate the influence of the variables on the load-carrying capability of the structures. Finally a lightweight design scheme was put forwads for vehicle frontal rail and B-pillar. It is demonstrated that, by using weld-bonding, structural weight can be reduced without sacrificing the load-carrying capability.
引文
[1]常保华,史耀武,董仕节.胶焊技术及其应用.焊接技术, 1998, 1:9-12.
    [2] Chang B, Shi Y, Dong S. Studies on a computational model and the stress field characteristics of weld-bonded joints for a car body steel sheet. J Mater Process Tech, 2000, 100:171-178.
    [3] Heidi B, El-Sebakhy I, Malik D. Weldbonding of structural adhesives for body stiffening. Worldwide Passenger Car Conf, USA, 1992.
    [4] Masashi K. Fatigue strength of adhesive bonded box section beams with a longitudinal partition under torsion. Trans Japan Soc Mech Eng A, 1993, 569:87-93.
    [5] Wang PC, Banas G, Lawrence V L. The role of failure mode, resistance spot weld and adhesive on the fatigue behavior of weld-bonded aluminum. Weld J, 1995, 1:41-47.
    [6] Darwish S M, Azaym K, Sadek M M. Dynamic characteristics of industrial double containment joints. Proceedings of the International Conference on CAPE, Edinburgh, 1989.
    [7] Darwish S M, Azaym K, Sadek M M. Design philosophy of a bonded gear box. Int J Mach Tools Manufact, 1991, 31(1):625-31.
    [8] Darwish S M, Niazi A, Ghanya A, et al. Improving electrical conductivity of structural epoxy resin adhesives. Int J Adhesion Adhesives, 1990, 11:27-41.
    [9] Kilik S, Davies R, Darwish S M. Thermal conductivity of epoxy resin adhesives. Int J Adhesion Adhesives, 1990, 19:219-23.
    [10] Darwish S M, Niazi A, Ghanya A. Phase stability of duralumin machined with bonded and brazed metal cutting tools. Int J Mach Tools Manufact, 1992, 32:593-600.
    [11] Schwartz M M. Metals joining manual book. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1979.
    [12] Darwish S M, Davies R. Adhesive bonding of metal cutting tools. Int J Mach Tools Manufact, 1989, 29(1):141-52.
    [13] Darwish S M, Davies R. Investigation of heat flow through bonded and brazed metal cutting tools. Int J Mach Tools Manufact, 1989, 29(2):229-37.
    [14] Darwish S M, Ghanya A. Critical assessment of weld-bonded technologies. J Mater Process Tech, 2000, 105:221-229.
    [15] Darwish S M, Samhan A. Thermal stresses developed in weld-bonded joints. J Mater Process Tech, 2004, 153:971-977.
    [16] Santos I O, Zhang W, Gonc V M, et al. Weld bonding of stainless steel. Int J Mach Tools Manufact, 2004, 44:1431-1439.
    [17] Cavalli M N, Thouless M D, Yang Q D. Cohesive modeling of the deformation and fracture of weld bonded Joints. Welding J, 2004, 83:133-139.
    [18] Samhan A, Darwish S M. Finite element modeling of weld-bonded joints. J Mater Process Tech, 2003, 142:587-598.
    [19] Samhan A, Darwish S M. Strength prediction of weld-bonded joints. J Mater Process Tech, 2003, 23:23-28.
    [20] Darwish S M. Analysis of weld-bonded dissimilar materials. Int J Adhesion Adhesives, 2004, 24:347-354.
    [21] Darwish S M, Samhan A. Peel and shear strength of spot-welded and weld-bonded dissimilar thickness joints. J Mater Process Tech, 2004, 147:51-59.
    [22] Yin Y, Chen J, Tu. Creep stress redistribution of single-lap weldbonded joint. Mech Time-Depend Mater, 2005, 9:97-101.
    [23] Chang B, Shi Y, Dong S. Comparative studies on stresses in weld-bonded, spot-welded and adhesive-bonded joints. J Mater Process Tech, 1999, 87:230-236.
    [24] Chang B, Shi Y, Lu L. Studies on the stress distribution and fatigue behavior of weld-bonded lap shear joints. J Mater Process Tech, 2001, 108:307-313.
    [25]常保华,史耀武,董仕节.胶焊接头中焊点大小对应力分布的影响.航空制造技术, 1999, 1: 22-25.
    [26] Darwish S M. Characteristics of weld-bonded commercial aluminum sheets. Int J Adhesion Adhesives, 2003, 23:169-176.
    [27] Darwish S M, Samhan A. Design rationale of weld-bonded joints. Int J Adhesion Adhesives, 2004, 24:367-377.
    [28]常保华,史耀武,董仕节.胶粘剂厚度和弹性模量对胶焊接头应力分布的影响.材料工程, 1998, 5:19-23.
    [29]常保华,史耀武,董仕节.板厚对不同胶粘剂胶焊单搭接头中应力分布影响的数值分析.中国机械工程, 1999, 3:341-344.
    [30] Seong M S, Kim T H, Nguyen K H, et al. A parametric study on the failure of bonded single-lap joints of carbon composite and aluminum. Comp Struct, 2008, 86:135-145.
    [31]常保华,史耀武,董仕节.搭接长度对胶焊接头应力分布的影响.机械强度, 1999, 21:109-111.
    [32] Garmo E P D, Black J T and Kohser R A. Materials and processes in manufacturing. 8th ed. New York: Prentice-Hall, 1997.
    [33] Abdel W M M, Crocombe A D, Beevers A, et al. Coupled stress-diffusion analysis for durability study in adhesively bonded joints. Int J Adhesion Adhesives, 2002, 22:61-73.
    [34] Knox E M, Cowling M J. Durability aspects of adhesively bonded thick adherend lap shear joints. Int J Adhesion Adhesives, 2000, 20:323-331.
    [35] Ansarifar M A, Zhang J, Baker J, et al. Bonding properties of rubber to steel, aluminium and nylon 6,6. Int J Adhesion Adhesives, 2001, 21:369-380.
    [36] Heslehurst R B. Observations in the structural response of adhesive bondline defects. Int J Adhesion Adhesives,1999, 19:133-154.
    [37] Loh W K, Crocombe A D, Abdel M M, et al. Environmental degradation of the interfacial fracture energy in an adhesively bonded joint. Eng Fract Mech, 2002, 69:2113-2128.
    [38] Blackman B R K, Dear J P, Kinloch A J, et al. The failure of fibre composites and adhesively bonded fibre composites under high rates of test. J Mater Sci, 1995, 30:5885-5900.
    [39] Knox E M, Cowling M J. A rapid durability test method for adhesives.Int J Adhesion Adhesives, 2000, 20:201-208.
    [40] Wylde J W, Spelt J K. Measurement of adhesive joint fracture properties as a function of environmental degradation. Int J Adhesion Adhesives, 1998, 18:237-246.
    [41] Bistac S, Vallat M F, Schultz J. Durability of steel/polymer adhesion in an aqueous environment. Int J Adhesion Adhesives, 1998, 18:365-369.
    [42] Brewis D M, Critlow G W, Curtis C A. Cryoblasting as a pretreatment to enhance adhesion to aluminium alloys. Int J Adhesion Adhesives, 1999, 19:253-256.
    [43] Rider A N, Arnott D R. Boiling water and silane pre-treatment of aluminium alloys for durable adhesive bonding. Int J Adhesion Adhesives, 2000, 20:209-220.
    [44] Chai H. The effects of bond thickness, rate and temperature on the deformation and fracture of structural adhesives under shear loading. Int J Fract, 2004, 130:497-515.
    [45] Xu C, Ramani K, Kumar G. Thermoplastic adhesive bonding of galvanized steel to polypropylene composite and its durability. Int J Adhesion Adhesives, 2002, 22:187-195.
    [46] Kinloch A J. Durability of structural adhesives. 1st ed. Applied Science Publisher LTD, 1983.
    [47] Zhao H, Zhou L, Cai Z. Mechanical properties of weld-bonded joint of high strength steel. Proceedings of the 6th international Conference on frontiers of design and manufacturing, 2004.
    [48] Xia Y, Zhou Q, Wang PC, Johnson NL, Gayden XQ and Fickes JD. Development of high efficiency modeling technique for weld-bonded steel joints in vehicle structures, Part I: Static experiments and simulations. Int J Adhesion Adhesives, 2009, 29:414-426.
    [49] Xia Y, Zhou Q, Wang PC, Johnson NL, Gayden XQ and Fickes JD. Development of high efficiency modeling technique for weld-bonded steel joints in vehicle structures, Part II: Dynamic experiments and simulations. Int J Adhesion Adhesives, 2009, 29:427-433.
    [50] Ochsner A, Gegner J. Application of the finite element method in the tensile-shear test of adhesive technology. Int J Adhesion Adhesives, 2001, 21:349-353.
    [51] Feih S, Shercliff H R. Adhesive and composite failure prediction of single-L joint structures under tensile loading. Int J Adhesion Adhesives, 2005, 25:47-59.
    [52] Ferracin T, Landis C M, Delannay F, et al. On the determination of the cohesive zone properties of an adhesive layer from the analysis of the wedge-peel test. Int J Solids Struct, 2003, 40:2889-2904.
    [53] Davis M, Bond D. Principles and practices of adhesive bonded structural joints and repairs. Int J Adhesion Adhesives, 1999, 19:91-102.
    [54] Landrock A H. Adhesive technology handbook. 1st ed. New Jersey: Noyes Publication, 1985.
    [55] Office of Aviation Research Washington DC. Methods of analysis and failure predictions for adhesively bonded joints of uniform and variable bondline thickness. http://www.tc.faa.gov/its/worldpac/techrpt/ar05-12.pdf, 2005.
    [56] Zgoul M, Crocombe A D. Numerical modelling of lapjoints bonded with a rate-dependent adhesive. Int J Adhesion Adhesives, 2004, 24:355-366.
    [57] Xu C, Siegmund T, Ramani K. Rate-dependent crack growth in adhesives II. Experiments and analysis. Int J Adhesion Adhesives, 2003, 23:15-22.
    [58] Maheri M R, Adams R D. Determination of dynamic shear modulus of structural adhesives in thick adherend shear test specimens. Int J Adhesion Adhesives, 2002, 22:119-127.
    [59] Wooley G R, Carver D R. Stress concentration factors for bonded lap joints. J Aircraft, 1971, 8:817-825.
    [60] Yadigari S, Papireddy C, Sanjeeva R Y T. Viscoelastic analysis of adhesively bonded joints. Comput Struct, 1987, 27:445-454.
    [61] Carpenter W C, Barsoum R. Two finite elements for modelling the adhesive in bonded configurations. J Adhesion, 1989, 30:25-46.
    [62] Su C, Wei Y J, Anand L. An elastic-plastic interface constitutive model: application to adhesive joints. Int J Plast, 2004, 20:2063-2081.
    [63] ABAQUS Inc. ABAQUS/Analysis User’s Manual, Version 6.6, 2006.
    [64] Dugdale D S. Yielding of steel sheets containing slits. J Mech Phys Solids, 1960, 8:100-104.
    [65] Barenblatt.G. The mathematieal theory of equilibrium cracks in brittle fracture. Advances Appl Mech, 1962, 7:55-129.
    [66] Hillerborg A, Modeer.M, Petersson.P. Analysis of crack formation and crack growth in concrete by means of fracture mechanics and finite elements. Cement Concr Res, 1976, 6:773-782.
    [67] Needleman A. A continuum model for void nucleation by inclusion debonding. J Appl Mech, 1987, 54:525-531.
    [68] Sehwalbe K H, Comee A. Modeling crack growth using local process zones. Technical report, GKSS research center, Geesthacht, 1994.
    [69] Needleman A. Ananalysis of decohesion along an imperfect interface. Int J Fract, 1990, 42:21-40.
    [70] Rose J H, Smith J R, Ferrante J. Universal features of bonding in metals. Physical Review B, 1983, 28:1835-1845.
    [71] Tvergaard V, Hutehinson J W. The relation between crack growth resistanee and fracture process parameters in elastie-plastic solids. J Mech Phys Solids, 1993, 40:1877-1892.
    [72] Yang Q D, Thouless M D, Ward S M. Numerical simulations of adhesively-bonded beams failing with extensive plastic deformation. J Mech Phys Solids, 1999, 47:1337-1353.
    [73] Yang Q D, Thouless M D. Mixed-mode fracture analyses of plastically-deforming adhesive joints. Int J Fract, 2001, 110:175-187.
    [74] Yang Q D, Thouless M D, Ward S M. Elastic-plastic mode-II fracture of adhesive joint. Int J Solids Struct, 2001, 38:3251-3262.
    [75] Kafkalidis M S, Thouless M D, Yang Q D. Deformation and fracture of adhesive layers constrained by plastically-deforming adherends. J Adhesion Sci Tech, 2000, 14:1593-1607.
    [76] Diehl T. Modeling surface-bonded structures with ABAQUS cohesive elements: beam-type solution. ABAQUS users’conference, Stockholm, Sweden, 2005.
    [77] Liljedahl C D M, Crocombe A D, Wahab M A, et al. Damage modelling of adhesively bonded joints. Int J Fract, 2006, 141:147-161.
    [78] Kafkalidis M S, Thouless M D. The effects of geometry and material properties on the fracture of single lap-shear joints. Int J Solids Struct, 2002, 39:4367-4383.
    [79] Hesebeck O, Nossek M, Werner H, et al. Modeling of flexible adhesive joints in automotive crash simulations: calibration and application of cohesive elements. ABAQUS Users’Conference, Paris, France, 2007.
    [80] Feucht M, Haufe A, Pietsch G. Adhesive modeling in crash simulation. LS-DYNA Forum, Frankenthal, Germany, 2007.
    [81] Anvari M, Scheider I, Thaulow C. Simulation of dynamic ductile crack growth using strain-rate and triaxiality-dependent cohesive elements. Eng Fract Mech, 2006, 73:2210-2228.
    [82] Andruet R H, Dillard D A, Holzer S M. Two- and three-dimensional geometrical nonlinear finite elements for analysis of adhesive joints. Int J Adhesion Adhesives, 2000, 21:17-29.
    [83] Alexander. Crash stable adhesives in application and simulation. LS-DYNA user conference, 2006.
    [84] Wang R X, Sinclair A N, Spelt J K. Strength of adhesive joints with adherend yielding: II. Peel experiments and failure. J Adhesion, 2003, 79:49-66.
    [85] Dean G, Crocker L, Read B. Prediction of deformation and failure of rubber-toughened adhesive joints. Int J Adhesion Adhesives, 2004, 24:295-306.
    [86] Gurson A. Continuum theory of ductile rupture by void nucleation and growth: I. Yield criteria and flow rules for porous ductile media. J Eng Mater Tech, 1977, 99:2-15.
    [87] Tvergaard V, Needleman A. Analysis of the cup-cone fracture in a round tensile bar, Acta Mater, 1984, 32:157-169.
    [88] Tvergaard V. Material failure by void growth to coalescence. Advances in Appl Mech, 1990, 27:83-151.
    [89] Imanaka M, Nakamura Y, Nishimurab A. Fracture toughness of rubber-modified epoxy adhesives: effect of plastic deformability of the matrix phase. Comp Sci Tech, 2003, 63:41-51.
    [90] Chai H. Interfacial mixed-mode fracture of adhesive bonds undergoing large deformation. Int J Solids Struct, 2003, 40:6023-6042.
    [91] Chew H B, Guo T F, Cheng L. Pressure-sensitive ductile layers - I. Modeling the growth of extensive damage. Int J Solids Struct, 2007, 44:2553-2570.
    [92] Chew H B, Guo T F, Cheng L. Pressure-sensitive ductile layers - II. 3D models of extensive damage. Int J Solids Struct, 2007, 44:5349-5368.
    [93] Kim J, Zhang G, Gao X. Modeling of ductile fracture: Application of the mechanism-based concepts. Int J Solids Struct, 2007, 44:1844-1862.
    [94]王吉涛.胶焊车身结构在碰撞载荷下大变形的模拟技术[硕士学位论文].北京:清华大学汽车工程系, 2006.
    [95] Chao Y J. Ultimate strength and failure mechanism of resistance spot weld subjected to tensile, shear or combined tensile/shear loads. J Eng Mater Tech, 2003, 125:125-132.
    [96] Wung P, Walsh T, Ourchane A, et al. Failure of spot welds under in-plane static loading. Exp Mech, 2001, 41:100-106.
    [97] Wung P, Walsh T, Ourchane A, et al. The ignored failure mode: spot weld under in-plane rotation (Physical Test). SAE Paper No. 1999-01-3212, 1999.
    [98] Lin S H, Pan J, Wu S, et al. Failure loads of spot weld specimens under impact opening and shear loading conditions. Exp Mech, 2004, 44:147-157.
    [99] Lin S H, Pan J, Wu S, et al. Failure loads of spot weld under combined opening and shear static loading conditions. Int J Solids Struct, 2002, 39:19-39.
    [100] Wung P. A force-based failure criterion for spot weld design. Exp Mech, 2001, 41:107-113.
    [101] Cheng C S. The assessment of a combined methodology for spot weld failure modeling. SAE Paper No. 2004-01-0690, 2004.
    [102] Langrand B, Combescure A. Non-linear and failure behaviour of spotwelds: a global finite element and experiments in pure and mixed modes I/II. Int J Solids Struct, 2004, 41:6631-6646.
    [103] LSTC ed. LS-DYNA keyword user's manual, Version 971, 2007.
    [104] Chao Y J. Failure mode of spot welds: interfacial versus pullout. Sci Tech Weld Joining, 2003, 8:133-137.
    [105] Lin S H, Pan J, Tyan T, et al. A general failure criterion for spot welds under combined loading conditions. Int J Solids Struct, 2003, 40:5539-5564.
    [106] Combescurea A, Delcroix F, Caplain L, et al. A finite element to simulate the failure of weld points on impact. Int J Impact Eng, 2003, 28:783-802.
    [107] Moran P M, Shih C F. Crack growth and cleavage in mismatched welds: a micromechanics study using a cell model, Int J Fract, 1998, 92:153-174.
    [108] O'Dowd N P, Lei Y, Busso E P. Prediction of cleavage failure probabilities using the Weibull stress. Eng Fract Mech, 2000, 67:87-100.
    [109] Zhou B, Thouless M D, Ward S M. Predicting the failure of ultrasonic spot welds by pull-out from sheet metal. Int J Solids Struct, 2006, 43:7482-7500.
    [110] Wang J T, Xia Y, Zhou Q, et al. Simulation of spot weld pullout by modelling failure around nugget, SAE Paper No. 2006-01-0532, 2006.
    [111] Sun D Z, Sester M, Schmitt W. Development and application of micromechanical material models for ductile fracture and creep damage. Int J Fract, 1997, 86:75-90.
    [112] Negre P, Steglich D, Brocks W. Crack extension in aluminium welds: a numerical approach using the Gurson-Tvergaard-Needleman model. Eng Fract Mech, 2004, 71:2365-2383
    [113] Zhang Z L, Qdegard J, Myhr O R, et al. From microstructure to deformation and fracture behavior of aluminium welded joints-a holistic modeling approach. Computational Mater Sci, 2001, 21:429-435.
    [114] Lamouroux E H J, Coutellie D, Doelle N, et al. Detailed model of spot-welded joints to simulate the failure of car assemblies. Int J Interactive Design Manufact, 2007, 1:33-40.
    [115] Penuelas I, Betegon C, Rodr?guez C. A ductile failure model applied to the determination of the fracture toughness of welded joints. Eng Fract Mech, 2006, 73:2756-2773.
    [116] Rakin M, Gubeljak N, Dobrojevic M, et al. Modelling of ductile fracture initiation in strength mismatched welded joint. Eng Fract Mech, 2008, 75:3499-3510.
    [117] ASTM D638-03. Test method for tensile properties of plastics. December, 2003.
    [118] ASTM E8M-04. Standard test methods for tension testing of metallic materials. April, 2004.
    [119] Peters W H, Ranson W F. Digital image techniques in experimental stress analysis. Opt Eng, 1982, 21:427-431.
    [120] Castagnetti D, Dragoni E. Standard finite element techniques for efficient stress analysis of adhesive joints. Int J Adhesion Adhesives, 2009, 29:125-135.
    [121] Beevers A, Steidler S M, Durodola J. Analysis of stiffness of adhesive joints in car bodies. J Mater Process Tech, 2001, 118:96-101.
    [122] Tsai M Y, Morton J. The effect of a spew fillet on adhesive stress distributions in laminated composite single-lap joints. Comp Struct, 1995, 32:123-131.
    [123] Lang T P, Mallick P K. Effect of spew geometry on stresses in single lap adhesive joints. Int J Adhesion Adhesives, 1998, 18:167-77.
    [124] Reyes A, Hopperstad O S, Berstad T, et al. Implementation of a constitutive model for Aluminum foam including fracture and statistical variation of density. 8th International LS-DYNA User Conference, Dearborn, USA, 2004.
    [125] Bao Y, Wierzbicki T. On fracture locus in the equivalent strain and stress triaxiality space. Int J Mech Sci, 2004, 46:81-98.
    [126] Nahshon K, Hutchinson J W. Modification of the Gurson model for shear failure. European J Mech - A/Solids, 2008, 1:1-17.
    [127] Xue L. Constitutive modeling of void shearing effect in ductile fracture of porous materials. Eng Fract Mech, 2008, 11:3343-3366.
    [128] Che H Y, Zhu L, Sun D Z, et al. Characterization and modeling of aluminum extrusion damage under crash loading. Thin-Walled Struct, 2007, 45:383-392.
    [129] Hahn O, Kurzok J R, Oeter M. Prüfvorschrift für die LWF KS-2-Probe. Laboratorium für Werkstoff- und Fügetechnik, Universit?t Paderborn, Pohlweg 47-49, 33098 Paderborn, http://www.lwf.uni-paderborn.de
    [130] Seeger F, Michel G, Blanquet M. Investigation of spot weld behavior using detailed modeling technique, 7th LS-Dyna User Conference, Bamberg, 2008
    [131] Madasamy C, Tyan T, Faruque O, et al. Methodology for testing of spot-welded steel connections under static and impact loadings, SAE Paper No. 2003-01-0608, 2003
    [132] Donders S, Brughmans M, Hermans L, et al. The robustness of dynamic vehicle performance to spot weld failures. Finite Elements in Analysis and Design, 2006, 42:670-682.
    [133] Stander N, Craig K J. On the robustness of a simple domain reduction scheme for simulation-based optimization. Eng Comput, 2002, 19:431-450.
    [134] LSTC ed. LS-OPT user’s manual. Version 3.3, 2008.
    [135] Springmann M, Kuna M. Identification of material parameters of the Gurson-Tvergaard-Needleman model by combined experimental and numerical techniques, Comput Mater Sci, 2005, 32:544-552.
    [136] Worswick M J, Pick R J. Void growth and coalescence during high velocity impact. Mech Mater, 1995, 19:293-309.
    [137] Zhang Z L, Thaulow C, Qdegard J. A complete Gurson model approach for ductile fracture. Eng Fract Mech, 2000, 67:155-168.
    [138] Reusch F, Svendsen B, Klingbeil D. Local and non-local Gurson-based ductile damage and failure modelling at large deformation. European J Mech - A/Solids, 2003, 22:779-792.
    [139] Marya M, Gayden X Q. Development of requirements for resistance spot welding of dual-phase steels (DP600)– Part I: The causes of interfacial fractures. General Motors R&D Center Technical Report No. 9885, September, 2004.
    [140] General Motors Global Welding Standard No.GWS-1A. Global weld design standard Section A: resistance spot welding. February, 2007.
    [141] Fisher R A. Statistical methods for research workers. 13th edition. Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd, 1958.
    [142] Box G E P, Wilson K G. On the experimental attainment of optimum conditions. J Royal Statistical Society, 1951, 13:1-45.
    [143] Kiefer J. Optimum experimental designs. J Royal Statistical Society, 1959, 21:272-304.
    [144] Kiefer J. Optimum designs in regression problems. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 1961, 32:298-325.
    [145] Alexander J M. An approximate analysis of the collapse of thin cylindrical shells under axial load. Quart J Mech App Math, 1960, 13:10-15.
    [146] Wierzbicki T, Abramowicz W. On the crushing mechanics of thin-walled structures. ASME J Appl Mech, 1983, 50:727-734.
    [147] Abramowicz W, Jones N. Dynamic axial crushing of square tubes. Int J Impact Eng, 1984, 2:179-208.
    [148] Abramowicz W, Jones N. Dynamic progressive buckling of circular and square tubes. Int J Impact Eng, 1986, 4:243-270.
    [149] White M D, Jones N, Abramowicz W. A theoretical analysis for quasi-static axial crushing of top-hat and double-hat thin-wall sections. Int J Mech Sci, 1999, 41:209-233.