摘要
选择标记基因的安全性问题是制约转基因植物产业化的主要瓶颈之一。开发生物安全标记基因替代抗生素标记基因成为解决转基因植物安全性和促进转基因植物应用的重要策略。本研究利用体外定向分子进化技术对乳酸克鲁维酵母(Kluyveromyces lactis) Cu/Zn-SOD进行改造,并对以获得的高活力突变体基因为安全标记基因,百草枯(PQ)为选择剂建立新型安全筛选体系的可行性进行了较为系统的研究。
通过克隆乳酸克鲁维酵母Cu/Zn-SOD基因,并在PGK1启动子驱动下与GFP基因融合,构建YEplac195-PSGA,转化酿酒酵母W303菌株。通过菌落PCR和荧光显微观察及添加PQ进行发酵检测,结果表明乳酸克鲁维酵母Cu/Zn-SOD基因在酿酒酵母中成功表达。
通过一步基因置换法构建酿酒酵母sod1缺失菌株LN303。首次采用酿酒酵母sod1缺失菌株作为表达宿主,通过在CM-Ura培养基中添加1 mmol/L PQ制造高氧压力,建立了Cu/Zn-SOD的高效筛选模型。
通过优化易错PCR体系中Mn2+浓度,确定其最适浓度为0.5 mmol/L。经易错PCR建立突变文库进行筛选,得到三个酶活力提高的突变体S1、S2和S3(S99R/A92G,S135P,D126N),其酶活力分别是野生酶的2.6、1.5和1.2倍。运用计算机三维结构模拟,对氨基酸置换所导致的酶分子结构变化和活力提高分子机制进行了初步分析,结果表明局部静电环境、内部氢键相互作用及活性通道的大小和形状对酶活力提高产生了重要影响。
将乳酸克鲁维酵母来源的Cu/Zn-SOD和突变体S1(mSOD)基因与拟南芥谷胱甘肽还原酶叶绿体信号肽(Chl)融合,构建植物表达载体pBI121-Chl-SOD和pBI121-Chl-mSOD,并通过农杆菌介导法成功转化烟草,分别获得再生植株35和46个株系。通过PCR、RT-PCR、叶绿体SOD活性测定证明目的基因已经整合到烟草基因组中并正常定向进入叶绿体表达。转Chl-SOD和Chl-mSOD植株的SOD活性分别是野生型植株的1.8倍和5.3倍。在PQ和200 mmol/L NaCl处理下,考察其对转基因植株的表观伤害、质膜透性、叶绿素a荧光动力学、抗氧化酶活性的影响,结果表明转基因植株抗氧化能力和耐盐能力有不同程度的提高,且提高大小顺序为转Chl-mSOD植株>转Chl-SOD植株>野生型植株。因此在烟草叶绿体中过表达乳酸克鲁维酵母来源的Cu/Zn-SOD和突变体S1基因能够提高转基因植株的抗氧化能力和耐盐能力。建立了以乳酸克鲁维酵母来源的Cu/Zn-SOD突变体S1(mSOD)基因作为选择标记基因,PQ作为选择剂的新型安全筛选体系。将植物表达载体pBI121-Chl-mSOD中去除nptⅡ标记基因表达盒,得到pBI121'。确定烟草遗传转化体系中PQ作为选择剂的适宜浓度为6 ?mol/L。在农杆菌介导的叶盘法转化烟草过程中,以mSOD基因作为选择标记基因,以6 ?mol/L PQ为选择剂,筛选得到96株表型正常的T0代转基因植株。通过PCR、Southern blot和RT-PCR对转基因植株进行检测,结果表明mSOD基因已整合到烟草基因组中,并获得转录水平上的表达。转化频率最高为39.26%,与以nptⅡ为选择标记基因,100 mg/L Kan为选择剂的传统筛选体系进行比较,转pBI121-Chl-mSOD植株和转pBI121'植株的转化频率分别是其2.16倍和2.1倍。对其遗传稳定性分析结果表明大多数T0代转基因植株为单拷贝,且表现出3:1分离方式,符合孟德尔分离定律。
通过测定种子发芽率、株高、叶片数等指标,考察T0代和T1代转基因植株对PQ诱导的氧化胁迫和盐胁迫的耐受性。结果表明T0代和T1代转基因植株对PQ诱导的氧化胁迫和盐胁迫的耐受性明显高于野生型植株。
此新型安全筛选体系不仅避免了使用抗生素抗性标记基因和抗除草剂标记基因,对生态环境和人类相对安全,同时具有以下优势:转化效率大大提高;获得转基因植株的周期缩短;选择标记基因可以同时为目的基因,提高转基因植物对氧化胁迫、盐胁迫的耐受性。这将对加快转基因商品化和产业化进程具有重要意义。
Biosafety issues of selectable marker genes are the major choke points which restrict the process of genetically modified plants industrialization. The development of bio-security marker genes to substitute for antibiotics and herbicides resistance genes is viewed as an important and alternative strategy to solve the biosafety problem and promote the application of transgenic plants. In this study, Kluyveromyces lactis Cu/Zn-SOD was modified by in vitro directed molecular evolution to obtain high activity mutant gene which was used as a selectable marker gene with paraquat as selective agent. The feasibility of this new efficient screening syetem was systematically discussed.
We constructed YEplac195-PSGA plasmid by cloning Kluyveromyces lactis Cu/Zn-SOD gene fused to GFP gene under PGK1 promoter. The plasmid was transformed into yeast W303 strain. The expression of Kluyveromyces lactis Cu/Zn-SOD gene in yeast was confirmed by colony PCR, fluorescence microscopic observation and fermentation added with paraquat.
By the one-step gene replacement, sod1Δyeast mutant LN303 was constructed. Under high oxygen pressure produced by 1 mmol/L of paraquat added to CM-Ura medium, sod1Δyeast mutant was first used as an expression host. Hence, Cu/Zn-SOD efficient screening was established.
For optimization of error-prone PCR system, the Mn2+ concentration was set of 0.5 mmol/L. By error-prone PCR, mutant library was established and screened,obtaining three mutations S1, S2, S3 (S99R/A92G, S135P, D126N) with increased enzyme activity, which were 2.6-, 1.5- and 1.2-folds compared to wild type, respectively. We used computer simulation of three-dimensional structure to primarily analyse structural changes and the possible molecular mechanism of increased activity of the mutant enzymes caused by the amino acid substitution. The result showed that, local electrostatic environment, internal hydrogen bond interaction, and the size and shape of activity channel greatly impacted on the enzyme activity enhancement.
The plant expression vectors pBI121-Chl-SOD and pBI121-Chl-mSOD were constructed by fusion of Kluyveromyces lactis Cu/Zn-SOD gene, the mutant S1 (mSOD) gene to the chloroplast transit sequence from Arabidopsis thaliana glutathione reductase (Chl), respectively. Via Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of tobacco, 35 and 46 transgenic lines were successfully regenerated, respectively. PCR, RT-PCR, and chloroplast SOD activity assay demonstrated that the target gene was integrated into the tobacco genome, normally expressed and targeted into the chloroplast. The SOD activities of transgenic Chl-SOD plants and transgenic Chl-mSOD plants were respectively 1.8-and 5.3-folds of wild-type plants. Transgenic plants treated with paraquat and 200 mmol/L NaCl were investigated for apparent injury, membrane permeability, chlorophyll a fluorescence and antioxidant enzyme activities. Results showed that the transgenic lines showed different degrees of increased resistance to oxidative stress and salt stress, and the order of stress tolerance enhanced was: transgenic Chl-SOD plants>transgenic Chl-mSOD plants>wild-type plants. Therefore, over-expression of Kluyveromyces lactis Cu/Zn-SOD and mutant S1 (mSOD) gene in tobacco chloroplasts can enhance oxidative stress tolerance and salt stress tolerance of transgenic plants.
A new security screening system was established based on Kluyveromyces lactis Cu/Zn-SOD mutant S1 gene as a selectable marker gene and paraquat as the selective agent. The optimal concentration of paraquat concentration was determined to be 6 ?mol/L. 96 normal phenotype of T0 independent transgenic tobacco events were produced via Agrobacterium mediated procedure using mSOD gene as a selectable marker gene and 6 ?mol/L paraquat selection. PCR, Southern blot and RT-PCR detection in transgenic plants demonstrated that mSOD gene was integrated into the tobacco genome and expressed. The highest transformation frequency was 39.26%. Compared with traditional screening system using the standard selectable marker gene nptⅡand a selection regime of 100 mg/L kanamycin, the ratios of mSOD-positive transgenic plants were respectively 2.16-and 2.1-folds for the transformation of pBI121-Chl-mSOD and pBI121' plants. Genetic stability analysis of transgenic tobacco demonstrated most T0 transgenic plants contained single-copy insertion, with 3:1 segregation consistent with Mendel's law.
The germination rates of T1 seeds, height, and leaf number were recorded to inspect paraquat-induced oxidative stress and salt stress tolerance of T0 and T1 generation of transgenic plants. The result showed that both of them were higher than that of wild-type plant.
This new security screening system avoided the use of antibiotic or herbicide resistance genes therefor relatively safe to environment and human. It offered other benefits, for example transformation efficiency improved and the plants growing period shortened. Selectable marker gene can also be used as target gene, which confer oxidative stress tolerance and salt stress tolerance of transgenic plants.
引文
[1]金红,转基因农产品标识管理和检测技术研究进展,天津农业科学,2002, 8(4):48~53.
[2]杨海霞,转基因棉花的的商业化模式,中国投资,2008, 5:64~65.
[3] Bevan MW, Flavell RB, Chilton M-D. A chimaeric antibiotic resistance gene as a selectable marker for plant cell transformation. Nature, 1983, 304:184-187.
[4] Ortiz JPA, Reggiardo MI, Ravizzini RA, et al. Hygromycin resistance as an efficient selectable marker for wheat stable transformation. Plant Cell Reports, 1996, 15:877-881.
[5] Miki B & McHugh S. Selectable marker genes in transgenic plants:applications, alternatives and biosafety. J. Biotechnol., 2004, 107:193–232.
[6] Haldrup A, Petersen SG, Okkels FT. Positive selection: A plant selection principle based on xylose isomerase, an enzyme used in the food industry. Plant Cell Reports, 1998, 18:76-81.
[7] Schmitt F, Oakeley EJ, Jost JP. Antibiotics induce genome wide hypermethylation in cultured Nicotiana tabacum plants. J Biol Chem, 1997, 272:1534–1540.
[8] Bardini M, Labra M, Winfield M, et al. Antibiotic-induced DNA methylation changes in calluses of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell Tissue Org Cult, 2003, 72:157–162.
[9] Thompson CJ, Movva NR, Tizard R, et al. Characterization of the herbicide-resistance gene bar from Streptomyces hygroscopicus. EMBO J., 1987, 6:2519–2523.
[10] Wohlleben W, Arnold W, Broer I, et al. Nucleotide sequence of the phosphinothricin N-acetyltransferase gene from Streptomyces viridochromogenes Tü494 and its expression in Nicotiana tabacum. Gene, 1988, 70:25~37.
[11] Fromm ME, Morrish F, Armstrong C et al. Inheritance and expression of chimeric genes in the progeny of transgenic maize plants. Biotechnology, 1990, 8:833~839.
[12] Vasil V, Castillo AM, Fromm ME, et al. Herbicide resistant fertile transgenic wheat plants obtained by microprojectile bombardment of regenerable embryogenic callus. Biotechnology, 1992, 10:667~674.
[13] Rathore KS, Chowdhury VK, Hodges TK. Use of bar as a selectable marker gene and for the production of herbicide-resistant rice plants from protoplasts. Plant Mol. Biol., 1993, 21:871~884.
[14] Larkin PJ, Gibson JM, Mathesius U, et al. Transgenic white clover. Studies withthe auxin-responsive promoter, GH3, in root gravitropism and lateral root development. Transgenic Res., 1996, 5:325~335.
[15] Howe AR, Gasser CS, Brown SM, Padgette S R, et al. Glyphosate as a selective agent for the production of fertile transgenic maize (Zea mays L.) plants. Molecular Breeding, 2002, 10:153~164.
[16] Hansen G, Wright MS. Recent advances in the transformation of plants. Trends Plant Sci, 1999, 4:226~231.
[17] Flavell RB, Dart E, Fuchs RL, et al. Selectable marker genes: safe for plants? Biotechnology, 1992, 10:141–144.
[18] Dale PJ, Clarke B, Fontes EMG. Potential for the environmental impact of transgenic crops. Nat. Biotechnol., 2002, 20:567~574.
[19] Ramessar K, Peremarti A, Gómez-Galera S, et al. Biosafety and risk assessment framework for selectable marker genes in transgenic crop plants: a case of the science not supporting the politics. Transgenic Res., 2007, 16:261~280.
[20] Joersbo M, Okkels FT. A novel principle for selection of transgenic plant cells: Posotive selection. Plant Cell Reports, 1996, 16:219~221.
[21] Privalle LS. Phosphomannose isomerase, a novel plant selection system. Potential allergenicity assessment. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2002, 964:129~138.
[22] Joersbo M, Donaldson I, Kreiberg J, et al. Analysis of mannose selection used for transformation of sugar beet. Molecular Breeding, 1998, 4:111~117.
[23] Negrotto D, Jolley M, Beer S, et al. The use of phosphomannose-isomerase as a selectablemarker to recover transgenic maize plants (Zea mays L.) via Agrobacterium transformation. Plant Cell Reports, 2000, 19:798~803.
[24] Wang AS, Evans RA, Altendorf PR, et al. A mannose selection system for production of fertile transgenic maize plants from protoplasts. Plant Cell Reports, 2000, 19:654~660.
[25] Gadaleta A, Giancaspro A, Blechl A, et al. Phosphomannose isomerase, pmi, as a selectable marker gene for durum wheat transformation. Journal of Cereal Science, 2006, 43(1):31~37.
[26] Ding ZS, Zhao M, Jing YX, et al. Efficient Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of rice by phosphomannose isomerase/mannose selection. Plant Molecular Biology Reporter, 2006, 24:295~303.
[27] Jain M, Chengalrayan K, Abouzid A, et al. Prospecting the utility of a PMI/mannose selection system for the recovery of transgenic sugarcane (Saccharum spp. hybrid) plants. Plant Cell Reports, 2007, 26 (5):581~590.
[28] Wallbraun M, Sonntag K, Eisenhauer C, et al. Phosphomannose-isomerase (pmi) gene as a selectable marker for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of rapeseed. Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult, 99:345~351.
[29] Haldrup A, Petersen SG, Okkels FT. The xylose isomerase gene from Thermoanaerobacterium thermosulfurogenes allows effective selection of transgenic plant cells using D-xylose as the selection agent. Plant MolecularBiology, 1998, 37:287~296.
[30] Haldrup A, Petersen SG,·Okkels FT. Positive selection: a plant selection principle based on xylose isomerase, an enzyme used in the food industry. Plant Cell Reports, 1998, 18:76~81.
[31] LaFayette PR, Parrott WA. A non-antibiotic marker for amplification of plant transformation vectors in E. coli. Plant Cell Reports, 2001, 20(4):338~342.
[32] Stein R, Gross W, Schnarrenberger C. Characterization of a xylitol dehydrogenase and a d-arabitol dehydrogenase from the thermo- and acidophilic red alga Galdieria sulphuraria. Planta, 1997, 202:487~493.
[33] Heuel H, Shakeri-Garakani A, Turgut S. Genes for d-arabitol and ribitol catabolism from Klebsiella pneumoniae. Microbiology, 1998, 144:1631~1639.
[34] LaFayette PR, Kane PM, Phan BH, et al. Arabitol dehydrogenase as a selectable marker for rice. Plant Cell Reports, 2005, 24:596~602.
[35] Kunze I, Ebneth M, Heim U, et al. 2-Deoxyglucose resistance: A novel selection marker for plant transformation. Molecular Breeding, 2001, 7:221~227.
[36] Arruda P, Bright SWJ, Kueh JSH, et al. Regulation of aspartate kinase isoenzymes in barley mutants resistant to lysine plus threonine. Plant Physiology, 1984, 76:442~446.
[37] Perl A, Galili S, Shaul O, et al. Bacterial dihydrodipicolinate synthase and desensitized aspartate kinase: Two novel selectable markers for plant transformation. Nature Biotechnology, 1993, 11:715~718.
[38] Tozawa Y, Hasegawa Hu, Terakawa T, et al. Characterization of rice anthranilate synthaseα-subunit genes OASA1 and OASA2. tryptophan accumulation in transgenic rice expressing a feedback-insensitive mutant of OASA1. Plant Physiology, 2001, 126:1493~1506.
[39] Yamada T, Tozawa Y, Hasegawa H, et al. Use of a feedback-insensitiveαsubunit of anthranilate synthase as a selectable marker for transformation of rice and potato. Molecular Breeding, 2004, 14:363~373.
[40] Ebmeier A, Allison L, Cerutti H, et al. Evaluation of the Escherichia coli threonine deaminase gene as a selectable marker for plant transformation. Planta, 2004, 218:751~758.
[41] Erikson O, Hertzberg M, N?sholm T. The dsdA gene from Escherichia coli provides a novel selectable marker for plant transformation. Plant Molecular Biology, 2005, 57:425~433.
[42] Kawai K, Kaku K, Izawa N, et al. A novel mutant acetolactate synthase gene from rice cells, which confers resistance to ALS-inhibiting herbicides. J Pestic Sci, 2007, 32:89~98.
[43] Tougou M, Yamagishi N, Furutani N, et al. The application of the mutated acetolactate synthase gene from rice as the selectable marker gene in the production of transgenic soybeans. Plant Cell Reports, 2009, 28(5):769~776.
[44] Smigocki AC, Owens LD. Cytokinin gene fused with a strong promoterenhances shoot organogenesis and zeatin levels in transformed plant cells. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 1988, 85:5131~5135.
[45] Ebinuma H, Sugita K, Matsunaga E, et al. Selection of marker-free transgenic plants using the isopentenyl transferase gene. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 1997, 94:2117~2121.
[46] Endo S, Kasahara T, Sugita K, et al. The isopentenyl transferase gene is effective as a selectable marker gene for plant transformation in tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum cv. Petite Havana SRI). Plant Cell Reports, 2001, 20:60~66.
[47] Ebinuma H, Komamine A. MAT (Multi-Auto-Transformation) vector system. The oncogenes of Agrobacterium as positive markers for regeneration and selection of marker-free transgenic plants. In Vitro Cellular and Developmental Biology-Plant, 2001, 37(2):103~113.
[48] Thirukkumaran G, Khan RS, Chin DP, et al. Isopentenyl transferase gene expression offers the positive selection of marker-free transgenic plant of Kalanchoe blossfeldiana. Plant Cell Tissue and Organ Culture, 2009, 97(3):237~242.
[49] Sinha NR, Williams RE, Hake S. Overexpression of the maize homeobox gene, KNOTTED-1, causes a switch from determinate to indeterminate cell fates. Genes and Development, 1993, 7:787~795.
[50] Luo K, Zheng X, Chen Y, et al. The maize Knotted1 gene is an effective positive selectable marker gene for Agrobacterium-mediated tobacco transformation. Plant Cell Reports, 2006, 25 (5):403~409.
[51]沈宝成,李梅,石纪成等,绿色荧光蛋白及其在GMOS生态监测中的应用,植物学通报,24:134~140.
[52] Graham J, McNicol RJ, Kumar A. Use of the GUS gene as a selectable marker for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Rubus. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult, 1990, 20:35–39.
[53] Daniell H, Muthukumar B, Lee SB. Marker free transgenic plants: Engineering the chloroplast genome without the use of antibiotic selection. Current Genetics, 2001, 39 (2):109~116.
[54] Goddijn OJM, van der Duyn Schouten PM, Schilperoort RA, et al. A chimaeric tryptophan decarboxylase gene as a novel selectable marker in plant cells. Plant Molecular Biology, 1993, 22:907~912.
[55] Yang H Y, Nairn J, Ozias-Akins P. Transformation of peanut using a modified bacterial mercuric ion reductase gene driven by an actin promoter from Arabidopsis thaliana. Journal of Plant Physiology, 2003, 160(8):945~952.
[56] Dubouzet JG, Sakuma Y, Ito Y, et al. OsDREB genes in rice, Oryza sativa L., encode transcription activators that function in drought-, high-salt- and cold-responsive gene expression. The Plant Journal, 2003, 33(4):751~763.
[57] Shi H, Ishitani M, Kim C, Zhu J-K. The Arabidopsis thaliana salt tolerance geneSOS1 encodes a putative Na+/H+ antiporter. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2000, 97 (12):6896-6901.
[58] Zhu ZG, Wu R. Regeneration of transgenic rice plants using high salt for selection without the need for antibiotics or herbicides. Plant Science, 2008, 174:519~523.
[59]葛世超,刘艳宁,杨苏声.费氏中华根瘤菌与耐盐有关基因的克隆及其在大肠杆菌中的表达,遗传学报,2001, 28:575~582.
[60] Zhang WJ, Yang SS, Shen XY, et al. The salt-tolerance gene rstB can be used as a selectable marker in plant genetic transformation. Molecular Breeding, 2009, 23(2):269~277.
[61] Gough KC, Hawes WS, Kipatrick J, et al. Cyanobacterial GR6 glutamate-1-semialdehyde aminotransferase: A novel enzyme-based selectable marker for plant transformation. Plant Cell Reports, 2001, 20 (4):296~300.
[62] Rosellini D, Capomaccio S, Ferradini N, et al. Non-antibiotic, efficient selection for alfalfa genetic engineering. Plant Cell Reports, 2007, 26:1035~1044.
[63] Lee HJ, Duke MV, Duke SO. Cellular localization of protoporphyrinogen-oxidizing activities of etiolated barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) leaves (Relationship to mechanism of action of protoporphyrinogen oxidase-inhibiting herbicides). Plant Physiology, 1993, 102:881~889.
[64] Li X, Volrath SL, Nicholl DB, et al. Development of protoporphyrinogen oxidase as an efficient selection marker for Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation of maize. Plant Physiology, 2003, 133:736~747.
[65] Yemets A, Radchuk V, Bayer O, et al. Development of transformation vectors based upon a modified plantα-tubulin gene as the selectable marker. Cell Biology International, 2008, 32:566~570.
[66] B?ger P, Sandmann G. Carotenoid biosynthesis inhibitor herbicides-mode of action and resistance mechanisma Pesticide. Outlook,1998, 9:29~35.
[67] Chamovitz D, Pecker I, Hirschberg J. The molecular basis of resistance to the herbicide norflurazon. Plant Mol Biol,1991, 16, 967~974.
[68] Arias RS., Dayan FE., Michel A, et al. Characterization of a higher plant herbicide-resistant phytoene desaturase and its use as a selectable marker. Plant Biotechnology Journal, 2006, 4:263~273.
[69] Erikson O, Hertzberg M, N?sholm T. A conditional marker gene allowing both positive and negative selection in plants, Nat. Biotechnol, 2004, 22:455~458.
[70] Avonce N, Leyman B, Mascorro-Gallardo JO, et al. The Arabidopsis trehalose-6-P synthase AtTPS1 gene is a regulator of glucose, abscisic acid,and stress signaling. Plant Physiology, 2004, 136:3649~3659.
[71] Komari T, Hiei Y, Saito Y, et al. Vectors carrying two separate T-DNAs for cotransformation of higher plants mediated by Agrobacterium tumefaciens and segregation of transformants free from selection markers. The Plant Journal,1996, 10(1):165~174.
[72] Lu H J, Zhou X R, Gong Z X, et al. Generation of selectable marker-free transgenic rice using double right-border (DRB) binary vectors. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology, 2001, 28: 241~248.
[73] Cotsaftis O, Sallaud C, Breitler JC et al. Transposon-mediated generation of T-DNA- and marker-free rice plants expressing a Bt endotoxin gene. Molecular Breeding, 2002, 10:165~180.
[74] Hohn B, Levy AA, Puchta H. Elimination of selection markers from transgenic plants. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol., 2001, 12:139~143.
[75] Dale EC, Ow DW. Gene transfer with subsequent removal of the selection gene from the host genome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 1991, 88:10558~10562.
[76] Zuo J, Niu QW, Moller SG., et al. Chemical-regulated, site-specific DNA excision in transgenic plants. Nature Biotechnology, 2001, 19:157~161.
[77] Ma BG, Duan XY, Niu JX, et al. Expression of stilbene synthase gene in transgenic tomato using salicylic acid-inducible Cre/loxP recombination system with self-excision of selectable marker. Biotechnology Letters, 2009, 31 (1):163~169.
[78] Lloyd AM, Davis RW. Functional expression of the yeast FLP/FRT site-specific recombination system in Nicotiana tabacum. Mol Gen Genet, 1994, 242(6):653 ~657.
[79]单晓昳,李蓓,张举仁,利用FLP/frt重组系统产生无选择标记的转基因烟草植株,生物工程学报,2006, 22(5):744~750.
[80] Woo HJ, Cho HS, Lim SH, et al. Auto-excision of selectable marker genes from transgenic tobacco via a stress inducible FLP/FRT site-specific recombination system. Transgenic Res, 2009, 18:455~465.
[81] Matsunaga E, Sugita K, Ebinuma H. Asexual production of selectable marker-free transgenic woody plants, vegetatively propagated species. Molecular Breeding, 2002, 10:95~106.
[82] Sugita K, Kasahara T, Matsunaga E, et al. A transformation vector for the production of marker-free transgenic plants containing a single copy transgene at high frequency. The Plant Journal, 2000, 22:461~469.
[83] Zubko E, Scutt C, Meyer P. Intrachromosomal recombination between attP regions as a tool to remove selectable marker genes from tobacco transgenes. Nature Biotechnology, 2000, 18(4):442~445.
[84] De Vetten N, Wolters AM, Raemakers K, et al. A transformation method for obtaining marker-free plants of a cross-pollinating and vegetatively propagated crop. Nature Biotechnology, 2003, 21(4):439~442.
[85] Ahmad R, Kim YH, Kim MD, et al. Development of selection marker-free transgenic potato plants with enhanced tolerance to oxidative stress. Journal of Plant Biology, 2008, 51(6):401~407.
[86] Halliwell B. Reactive species and antioxidants. Redox biology is a fundamentaltheme of aerobic life. Plant Physiol, 2006, 141:312~322.
[87] Foote CS. Mechanisms of photosensitized oxidation. There are several different types of photosensitized oxidation which may be important in biological systems. Science, 1968, 162:963~970.
[88] Gechev TS, Van Breusegem F, Stone JM, et al. Reactive oxygen species as signals that modulate plant stress responses and programmed cell death. BioEssays, 2006, 28:1091~1101.
[89] Bienert GP, Schjoerring JK, Jahn TP. Membrane transport of hydrogen peroxide. Biochim Biophys Acta, 2006, 1758:994~1003.
[90] Kehrer JP. The Haber-Weiss reaction and mechanisms of toxicity.Toxicology, 2000, 149:43~50.
[91] Laloi C, Przybyla D, Apel K. A genetic approach towards elucidating the biological activity of different reactive oxygen species in Arabidopsis thaliana. J Exp Bot, 2006, 57:1719~1724.
[92] Asada K. Production and scavenging of reactive oxygen species in chloroplasts and their functions. Plant Physiol, 2006, 141:391~396.
[93] Gapper C, Dolan L. Control of plant development by reactive oxygen species. Plant Physiol, 2006, 141: 341~345.
[94] Sagi M, Fluhr R. Production of reactive oxygen species by plant NADPH oxidases. Plant Physiol, 2006, 141:336~340.
[95] Tanaka A, Christensen MJ, Takemoto D, et al. Reactive oxygen species play a role in regulating a fungus–perennial ryegrass mutualistic interaction. Plant Cell, 2006, 18:1052~1066.
[96] Ali BM, Hahn E-J., Paek K-Y. Effect of temperature on oxidative stress defence systems, lipid peroxidation and lipoxygenase activity in Phalaenopsis. Plant Physiol Biochem, 2005a, 43:213~223.
[97] Fazeli F, Ghorbanli M, Niknam V. Effect of drought on biomass, protein content, lipid peroxidation and antioxidant enzymes in two sesame cultivars.Biol Plant, 2007, 51:98~103.
[98] Romanowska E, Wróblewska B, Dro?ak A, et al. Effect of Pb ions on superoxide dismutase and catalase activities in leaves of pea plants griown in high and low irradiance.Biol Plant, 2008, 52:80~86.
[99] Lambreva M, Christov K, Tsonev T. Short-term effect of elevated CO2 concentration and high irradiance on the antioxidant enzymes in bean plants. Biol. Plant, 2006, 50:617~623.
[100] Niknam V, Razavi N, Ebrahimzadeh H, et al. Effect of NaCl on biomass, protein and proline contents,and antioxidant enzymes in seedlings and calli of two Trigonella species.Biol. Plant, 2006, 50:591~596.
[101] Shao HB, Chu LY, Lu ZH, et al. Primary antioxidant free radical scavenging and redox signaling pathways in higher plant cells.Int. J. biol. Sci., 2008, 4: 8~14.
[102] Zlatev ZS, Lidon FC, Ramalho JC, et al.Comparison of resistance to drought of three bean cultivars.Biol Plant, 2006, 50:389~394.
[103] Apel K, Hirt H. Reactive oxygen species: metabolism, oxidative stress, and signal transduction. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol., 2004, 55:373~399.
[104] Mittler R. Oxidative stress, antioxidants and stress tolerance. Trends in Plant Science, 2002, 7(9):405~410.
[105] Asada K. Production and scavenging of reactive oxygen species in chloroplasts and their functions. Plant Physiology, 2006, 141:391~396.
[106] Kanematsu S, Asada K. Characteristic amino acid sequences of chloroplast and cytosol isozymes of CuZn-superoxide dismutase in spinach, rice and horsetail. Plant and Cell Physiology, 1990, 31(1):99~112.
[107] Miller A-F. Superoxide dismutases: active sites that save, but a protein that kills. Current Opinion in Chemical Biology, 2004, 8:162~168.
[108] Tainer JA, Gertzoff ED, Richardson JS, et al. Structure and mechanism of copper, zinc superoxide dismutase. Nature, 1983, 306, 284~287.
[109] Smith MW, Doolittle RF. A comparison of evolutionary rates of the two major kinds of superoxide dismutase. Journal of molecular evolution, 1992,34(2):175~184.
[110] Hu AS, Study on the mechanism of high temperature damage of citrus and its prevention. South China Fruits, 1998, 27(2):13~14.
[111] Guo HJ, Dong ZQ, Lin YZ. Effect of infection of verticiflium wilt on SOD,POD activities and photosynthetic character in cotton leaves. Acta Phytophysiologica Sinica, 1995, 28(6):40~46.
[112] Sen Gupta A, Heinen JL,Holaday AS, et al. Increased resistance to oxidative stress in transgenic plants that overexpress chloroplastic Cu/Zn superoxide dismutase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 1993, 90:1629~1633.
[113] Badawi GH, Yamauchi Y, Shimada E, et al. Enhanced tolerance to salt stress and water deficit by overexpressing superoxide dismutase in tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) chloroplasts. Plant Science, 2004, 166:919~928.
[114] Prashanth SR, Sadhasivam V, Parida A. Over expression of cytosolic copper/zinc superoxide dismutase from a mangrove plant Avicennia marina in indica Rice var Pusa Basmati-1 confers abiotic stresstolerance Transgenic Res, 2008, 17:281~291.
[115] Wang FZ, WangQBin, Kwon S-Y, et al. Enhanced drought tolerance of transgenic rice plants expressing a pea manganese superoxide dismutase. Journal of Plant Physiology, 2005, 162:465~472.
[116] Tanaka Y, Hibino T, Hayashi Y, et al. Salt tolerance of transgenic rice overexpressing yeast mitochondrial Mn-SOD in chloroplasts. Plant Science, 1999,148:131~138.
[117] Wang YH, Ying Y, Chen J, et al. Transgenic Arabidopsis overexpressing Mn-SOD enhanced salt-tolerance. Plant Science, 2004, 167:671~677.
[118] Tepperman JM, Dunsmuir P. Transformed plants with elevated levels of chloroplastic SOD are not more resistant to superoxide toxicity. Plant Mol Biol, 1990, 14(4):501~511.
[119] Sen Gupta A, Webb RP, Holaday AS, et al. Overexpression of superoxide dismutase protects plants from oxidative stress. Plant Physiology, 1993b, 103:1067~1073.
[120] Farinas ET, BulterT, Arnold FH. Directed enzyme evolution. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol., 2001, 12:545~551.
[121] Reetz MT, Rentzsch M, Pletsch A, et al. Towards the directed evolution of hybrid catalysts. Chimia, 2002, 56:721~723.
[122] Taylor SV, Kast P, Hilvert D. Investigating and engineering enzymes by genetic selection. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl., 2001, 40:3310~3335.
[123] Waldo GS.Genetic screens and directed evolution for protein solubility. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol., 2003, 7:33~38.
[124] Chen K, Arnold FH. Enzyme engineering for nonaqueous solvent : random mutagenesis to enhance activity of sublisin E in polar organic media. Bio/ Technology, 1991, 9:1073~1077.
[125] Chen K, Arnold FH. Tuning the activity of an enzyme for unusual environments: sequential random mutagenesis of subtilisin E for catalysis in dimethylformamide. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A., 1993, 90(12): 5618~5622.
[126] Stephens DE, Rumbold K, Permaul K, et al. Directed evolution of the thermostable xylanase from Thermomyces lanuginosus. J Biotechnol, 2007, 127(3):348~354.
[127] Yu H, Li J, Zhang D, et al. Improving the thermostability of N-carbamyl-D-amino acid amidohydrolase by error-prone PCR. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol., 2009, 82(2):279~285.
[128] Kim M-S, Lei XG. Enhancing thermostability of Escherichia coli phytase AppA2 by error-prone PCR. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 79(1):69~75.
[129] Stemmer WPC. Rapid evolution of a protein in vitro by DNA shuffling. Nature, 1994, 370(4):389~391.
[130] Crameri A, Raillard S-Ai, Bermudez E, et al. DNA shuffling of a family of genes from diverse species accelerates directed evolution. Nature, 1998, 391:288~291.
[131] Iffland A, Tafelmeyer P, Saudan Christophe, et al. Directed Molecular Evolution of Cytochrome c Peroxidase. Biochemistry, 2000, 39 (35):10790~10798.
[132] Shao Z, Zhao H, Arnold FH. Random-priming in vitro recombination: an effective tool for directed evolution. Nucleic Acids Res, 1998 ,26 (2):681~683.
[133] Zhao H, Giver L, Shao Z, et al. Molecular evolution by staggered extension process (StEP) in vitro recombination. Nat Biotechnol, 1998, 16:258~261.
[134] Kolkman JA, Stemmer WPC. Directed evolution of proteins by exon shuffling.Nature Biotechnology, 2001, 19:423~428.
[135] Coco WM, Levinson WE, Crist MJ, et al. DNA shuffling method for generating highly recombined genes and evolved enzymes. Nat Biotechnol, 2001, 19:354~359.
[136] Ostermeier M, Shim JH, Benkovic SJ. A combinatorial approach to hybrid enzymes independent of DNA homology. Nat Biotechnol, 1999, 17:1205~1209.
[137] Sieber V, Martinez CA, Arnold FH. Libraries of hybrid proteins from distantly related sequence. Nat Biotechnol, 2001, 19:456~460.
[138]熊爱生,姚泉洪,彭日荷等,通过DNA改组技术获得高活性β-葡萄糖苷酸酶,中国生物化学与分子生物学报,2003, 19(2):162~167.
[139] Schmidt-Dannert C, Umeno D, Arnold FH. Molecular breeding of carotenoid biosynthetic pathways. Nature biotechnology, 18:750~753.
[140] Seffernick JL., Wackett LP. Rapid evolution of bacterial catabolic enzymes:a case study with atrazine chlorohydrolase. Biochemistry, 2001, 40(43):12747~12753.
[141] Macauley PS,Fazenda ML, McNeil B, et al. Heterologous protein production using the Pichia pastoris expression system. Yeast, 2005, 22:249~270.
[142] Leung DW, Chen E, Goeddel, et al. A method for random mutagenesis of a defined DNA segment using a modified polymerse chain reaction, Technique, 1989, 1:11~15.
[143]李洁,齐桂年,杨娟等,计算机测定茶树叶片受害面积及其受害面积百分率的方法研究,农业网络信息,2008, 6:31~34.