摘要
在市政公用行业的垄断越来越吸引人们目光的今天，打破行政垄断，建立规范的竞争市场的浪潮不可阻挡，这是供水企业实现自身发展的必由之路。本文通过对塘沽自来水业市场化改革的必然性、可行性、法律程序、运营管理、效益和风险、政府监管等问题进行系统研究，从而对加快城市供水行业市场化进程，并为整个市政行业的市场化改革提供了可借鉴的经验。
本文运用国有企业市场化改革的法律理念以及企业管理和公共管理的相关理论，客观的研究了塘沽自来水业市场化改革的程序以及改制后新的合作企业的运营管理，从组织结构设计，人力资源管理，企业文化建设以及国有企业中不容忽视的党组织的地位和作用几方面进行了分析并给出了建议。运用财务管理理论和定量分析方法对塘沽自来水业市场化改革后的效益和风险进行了分析，从而得出塘沽自来水业进行市场化运营对政府、公众以及企业职工来说都是“多赢”之举的结论。结合自来水业的市场化改革，本文从水价、水质、服务和安全几方面重点强调了政府的监管职能。
Nowadays, more and more attention has attracted to the monopoly of municipal administration communal profession. The wave can not be resisted to break the administrative monopoly and set up regulated competitive market, That are the necessary steps for water-supplying enterprises to develop themselves. By taking the marketization reformation of water-supplying industry in Tanggu for example, The author has researched the necessity, feasibility, legal procedure, operation & management, benefits & risks and administrative supervision, thereby put forward some referable experiences for accelerating the procedure of city’s water-supplying industry and even for the marketization reformation of public utility industries as a whole.
By applying the theory of the law related to the marketization reformation of state-owned enterprises and some relative theories of both business management and public administration, the author studied objectively the processes of marketization reformation of water-supplying industry in Tanggu and the operation of the new company of joint-venture. This study and experiential advices have covered the organizational structure design, human resources management, business culture building and the un-negligible status and functions that The party organizatoin in a new water-supplying company. With the theory of financial management theory and the approach of quantitative analysis, the author has analyzed the benefits and risks after the marketization, and drown a conclusion that marketization reformation of water-supplying industry in Tanggu will benefit all relative parties including government, society and employees. Besides, by illustrating the marketization reformation of water-supplying industry, the author emphasized that the supervise function of the government should be enhanced on the items of water price, water quality, service and security.
引文
[1]沈大军等，水价理论与实践，北京：科学出版社，2001，36—97
[2]汪光焘等，城市供水行业2000技术进步发展规划，北京：中国建筑工业出版社，1993，4-12
[3]蔡玉峰，政府与企业的博弈分析，北京：中国经济出版社，2000
[4]王莹，雒亚龙等,市政行业终结垄断，中国经济信息,2003,（9）：4—11
[5]张锦华，强文涛，我国城市供水产业的市场开放与特许经营制度，城镇供水，2002，（2）：25—27
[6]王璞，何平等，组织结构设计咨询与实务，北京：中信出版社，2003
[7]王璞，武凌等，企业文化咨询实务，北京：中信出版社，2003
[8]陈共等，财政学，北京：中国人民大学出版社，2000
[9]蔡吉祥，无形资产学导论，深圳：海天出版社，1997
[10]张军，供水企业如何选择改制形式，中国建设报/中国水业，2003，3
[11]张军，政府如何管制，中国建设报/中国水业，2002，8
[12]张军，供水企业经营风险初探，中国建设报，2003，3
[13]郑海良，论21世纪中国供水企业的市场化模式，给水排水，No.2,2000
[14]高中，中国公用事业民营化及水行业发展趋势，中国水网，2003，3
[15]金永祥，吴顺礼，英国水价管理模式，中国建设报/中国水业，2002，21
[16]李怀，自然垄断理论研究，大连：东北财经大学出版社，2003，11
[17]肖瑞，李利明，理性的激情，北京：中信出版社，2003，12
[18马建堂，刘海泉，中国国有企业改革的回顾和展望，北京：首都经济贸易大学出版社，2000，2
[19]昝淑珍，国有企业市场化与法律理念研究，北京：经济管理出版社，2003
[20]崔功豪，魏清泉等，区域分析与规划，北京：高等教育出版社，1999，6
[21]Cowen,Tyker, Three principles for sound water policy, USA: Economic Affairs, Jun98,Vol.18 Issue 2 ,p14, 3p
[22] Competition set to shake up UK market , USA:Water & Environment Internation, Feb2000,Vol.9 Issue 64,p6
[23] Chantal Liu, WEM NEWS, Water Engineering & Management,Sep2000,Vol.147 Issue 9, p16
[24]Soltis, Dan, Water alliance formed,services integrated, Water Engineering & Management, Nov98,Vol.145 Issue 11,p11