中医心系疾病PRO量表的研制
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
目的:
     本研究在总结前人经验的基础上,按照美国食品及药物管理局(FDA)规定的PRO量表制作原则与流程,从患者角度出发,编制出运用于中医心系疾病(心主血脉)临床疗效评价PRO量表,力求使该量表既简明扼要,具有较强的实用性及可操作性,又有一定的信度、效度和反应度,为中医心系疾病的临床疗效评价提供一个客观化、标准化的测量工具。
     内容与方法:
     遵循国际量表研制的程序规范,参照PRO的概念,结合中国文化特色并且根据中医对于心系疾病临床特点及内涵的理解,提出中医心系疾病PRO的目标人群是慢性心系疾病患者。根据中医的整体观,将阴平阳秘分为形神统一(包括生理性领域)、人与自然社会统一(社会领域及独立性领域)、七情(心理领域)三个方面,根据中医对于心主血脉的内涵的论述,构建中医心系疾病(心主血脉)的理论框架。通过查阅文献、访谈病人、临床心系疾病表现的总结形成条目池,再通过心系疾病专家修改针对不同的年龄、疾病分类,选取中学文化程度的患者10例进行文化适应性调查,经适应性调查后对部分条目的表达进行修改。之后,按照中医主要诊断、年龄、性别等进行分组,根据分组情况在广州中医药大学第一附属医院门诊、病房收集患者共346例,附近社区现场调查获得健康人样本46例,用中医心系疾病PRO量表进行调查,回收后的调查资料经离散趋势分析、相关系数法、判别分析法、因子分析、克朗巴赫系数法、专家重要性评分等统计分析筛选出53+1个指标组成正式量表。并且对量表进行科学性考核,主要包括信度考核、效度考核、区分度考核及项目反应理论。其中信度考核采用克朗巴赫系数及分半信度考核;效度考核包括内容效度及结构效度考核采用证实性因子分析、区分度考核采用健康人与中医心系疾病患者总分及各领域得分进行t检验,同时采用项目反应理论证实本量表的结构模型。
     结果:
     1.设计形成“中医心系疾病(心主血脉)PRO量表”。生理性领域胸闷痛、心悸、眩晕、气短四个主要维度,以及精神与疲倦、气色、睡眠、小便等其他维度合计8个方面;七情(心理领域)包括正面情感及负面情感;社会领域包括个人关系、社会支持程度、医疗、自然适应能力,并将独立性领域,包括日常生活能力、药物医疗的依赖、工作学习能力3个方面也归入社会领域范畴。量表总共包括53+1个条目。
     2.对346例有效数据进行信度分析,结果显示该量表总体及各领域、生理领域四个主要方面的克朗巴赫系数及分半信度均在0.8以上;对该量表的生理领域、心理领域、社会领域得分开展证实性因子分析,得到整个模型的卡方值为0,P=1.00;拟合优度指数(CFI)等于0.97,RMSEA等于0.000,说明整个模型的拟合效果优;健康人与中医心系疾病患者总分及各领域得分差异均具有统计学意义,反应度好;问卷应答时间适中、回收率高、易于理解;建立项目反应理论模型进行分析,得到PSI指数均接近1,表示模型的拟合度较好。
     结论:
     根据FDA量表研制的程序规范,研制出运用于中医心系疾病(心主血脉)临床疗效评价PRO量表,综合采用经典测量方法和项目反应理论对其进行评价。结果表明:该量表具有较好的信度、效度、反应度和临床可行性,可以作为中医心系疾病(心主血脉)临床疗效评价的工具,但仍需要在运用中不断改进。
Objective:
     On the basis of summarizing predecessors'experience, the study drew upon patient reported outcomes(PRO) used in the evaluation of the clinical effectiveness of Heart Diseases in Traditional Chinese Medicine(TCM), from the angle of patients, according to the regulation of U.S. food and drug administration (FDA) in working out the principle and procedure of PRO scale seek to make the standards not only practical and usable,but also valid, reliable and responsive. This PRO scale provided an objective and standardized measuring tool for clinical efficacy of Heart Diseases in TCM.
     Contents and Methods:
     Patients with Chronic Heart Disease are observed following the regulations of the international development program, referring to the PRO concept and combining with the characteristics of Chinese culture. In holistic conception of TCM, relative equilibrium of yin-yang is included in three aspects:unity of body and spirit (Physical field), unity of human and society(Society field and independent field), and the seven human emotions(psychological field). First, according to the discourse of theoretical Connotation of heart controlling blood circulation in TCM, the theoretical framework of Heart Diseases in TCM is formed. Second, the items pool, modified for different ages and classifications of diseases by experts in Heart diseases, can be summarized from consulting documents, inquiring patients and clinical feature of heart diseases. After surveying culture adaptability in10subjects with high school degree, this items pool is modified again. After confirming items pool,346subjects who came from the first affiliated hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese medicine are divided into different groups in terms of diagnoses of TCM, age and gender in the study.46healthy subjects are investigated by PRO scale of Heart Diseases in TCM to screen out53+1items and form the official PRO scale of Heart Diseases in TCM, through the discrete trend analysis, factor analysis, Cronbach's alpha, stepwise regression analysis, the internal consistency analysis, expert important grade and so on. Finally, the science of PRO questionaires of Heart Diseases in TCM is evaluate from three aspects:Reliability including Crowns Bach coefficient and split-half reliability; Validity covering content validity, construct validity employing confirmatory factor analysis and discriminated validity adopting T-test to distinguishing the patients from healthy people. responsibility proving the structural model of PRO questionaires.
     Result:
     1. The PRO scale of Heart Diseases in TCM (heart governing blood and vessels) was completed. Physical domain is separated into eight domains, four main domains which are chest tightness and chest pain, palpitation, vertigo, and shortness of breath, and four other domains such as sprites and fatigue, complexion, sleeping, urine and stool; the seven human emotions (psychological field) have the positive feelings and the negative feelings; Social field relate to personal relationships, social support level, medical treatment and the ability to adjust to the world. Independent field always refers to three aspects:ability of daily living, dependence on drug, and capacity of work and learning;There are altogether53+1items in this questionaire.
     2. After analyzing346valid data, the results show that Crowns Bach coefficient, split-half reliability are above0.8in four main aspects of the PRO questionaire; By confirmatory factor analysis analyzing score in Physical field, psychological field, Model for chi-square value of the structure of PRO questionaire is0, P=1; Goodness of Fit Index equal to0.97; RMSEA equal to0.000, which show imitative effect of the structure is excellent; The difference in total score and every field between health people and patients express that the degree of response is well; Questionnaire have a modest response time, a the high rate of recovery and been easily understandable:Analyzing item response theory model established, Parapsychology index is1,which is mean model factors have a high imitation degree.
     Conclusion:
     In accordance with FDA regulations,the PRO scale used in clinic efficacy on Heart Diseases in TCM is assessed by Classic measurement method and item response theory, the results demonstrate that the PRO scale can be a tool to evaluate clinical efficacy on Heart Diseases in TCM on account of good reliability,validity,reaction degree and clinical feasibility.
引文
[1]Donald L. Patrick. Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs):An Organizing Tool for Concepts, Measures and Applications[J]. QoL Newsletter,2003, (31):1-6
    [2]陈非凡,中医肝病PRO量表的研制与考核,硕十论文,广州中医药大学,12,2007
    [3]李立志,董国菊,王承龙,史大卓,訾明杰,何翻云,刘保延.“基于心血管疾病病人报告的临床疗效评价量表”的研制及统计学分析[J].中西医结合心脑血管病杂志.2008;6(7):757--759.
    [4]张连才,张启明,中医心与现代西医学组织器官的相关性研究[J],辽宁中医杂志2004,31(12):1000-1001
    [5]沈绍功,韩学杰,中医心病学正名与标准化研究[J],中国中医基础医学杂志,2007,13(7):485-487:
    [6]韩学杰,指导沈绍功,中医心病单元组合辨证分类法临证运用[J].中华中医药杂志.2007,22(11):777-779
    [7]韩学杰,指导沈绍功,中医心病痰瘀互结毒损心络的理论渊源与创新性研究[J].中国中医急症.2007,16(10):1169-1172
    [8]许朝霞,王忆勤,刘国萍,1160例心系患者中医问诊信息的特征分析[J].中国中医基础医学杂志.[J]2009.15(9):677-679
    [9]王忆勤、刘国萍等,心血管疾病中中医心系临床证侯的分布特征[J].中医研究.2010,12(6):888-891
    [10]宋观礼,郭伟星,张启明,中医心病证Logistic同归分析[J].中华中医药杂志2011.26(2):334-337
    [11]Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-itera short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection[J]. Med Care.1992 Jun;30(6):473-83.
    [12]Konerman M, Weeks KR, Shands JR, et al Short Form (SF-36) Health Survey measures are associated with decreased adherence among urban African Americans with severe, poorly controlled hypertension[J]. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich).2011 May;13(5):385-90.
    [13]Trevisol DJ, Moreira LB, Kerkhoff A, et al. Health-related quality of life and hypertension:a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies[J]. J Hypertens.2011 Feb;29(2):179-88. Review.
    [14]Kristen AV, Schuhmacher B, Strych K, et al. Acupuncture improves exercise tolerance of patients with heart failure:a placebo-controlled pilot study[J]. Heart.2010;96(17):1396-400.
    [15]Pedersen BD, Preisler P, Siersbaek-Hansen L, et al. COPE-IC Berg SK, Svendsen JH, Zwisler AD, D, a randomised clinical trial studying the effects and meaning of a comprehensive rehabilitation programme for ICD recipients-design, intervention and population[J]. BMC Cardiovasc Disord.2011;17(1):33.
    [16]Evans RA, Singh SJ, Williams JE, et al. The development of a self-reported version of the chronic heart questionnaire[J]. J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev.2011 Nov-De c;31(6):365-72.
    [17]Budzynski J, Pulkowski G, Suppan K, et al. Improvement in health-related quality of life after therapy with omeprazole in patients with coronary artery disease and recurrent angina-like chest pain. A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of the SF-36 survey[J]. Health Qual Life Outcomes.2011,22(9):77.
    [18]Cruz LN, Camey SA, Fleck MP,et al. World Health Organization quality of life instrument-brief and Short Form-36 in patients with coronary artery disease:do they measure similar quality of life concepts? [J]Polanczyk CA. Psychol Health Med.2009 Oct;14(5):619-28;
    [19]Groenveld HF, Crijns HJ, Van den Berg MP, et al. The effect of rate control on quality of life in patients with permanent atrial fibrillation:data from the RACE Ⅱ (Rate Control Efficacy in Permanent Atrial Fibrillation Ⅱ) study[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol.2011 Oct 18:58(17):1795-803.
    [20]Development of the World Health Organization WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment[J]. The WHOQOL Group. Psychol Med.1998 May;28(3):551-8.
    [21]Yilmaz E, Eser E, Giirgun C, et al. Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Chronic Heart Failure Questionnaire [J]Anadolu Kardiyol Derg.2010 Dec;10(6):526-38.
    [22]Chen Y, Wang SY, Chi GB, et al. Evaluation of quality of life of hypertensive patients. [J] Di Yi Jun Yi Da Xue Xue Bao.2005 Nov; 25(11):1387-9
    [23]Najafi M, Sheikhvatan M, Montazeri A. Quality of life-associated factors among patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery as measured using the WHOQOL-BREF. [J]Cardiovasc J Afr.2009 Sep-Oct;20 (5):284-9.
    [24]Hunt SM, McKenna SP, McEwen J et al.,A quantitative approach to perceived health status:a validation study [J]. J Epidemiol Community Health.1980 Dec; 34(4):281-6.
    [25]Hunt SM, McEwen J, McKenna SP. et al., Measuring health status:a new tool for clinicians and epidemiologists[J]. J R Coll Gen Pract.1985 Apr;35 (273):185-8.
    [26]O'Brien BJ, Buxton MJ, Ferguson BA. Measuring the effectiveness of heart transplant programmes:quality of life data and their relationship to survival analysis[J]. J Chronic Dis.1987;40 Suppl 1:137S-158S
    [27]Lukkarinen H, Hentinen M. Treatments of coronary artery disease improve quality of life in the long term[J]. Nurs Res.2006 Jan-Feb;55(1):26-33.
    [28]Cline CM, Willenheimer RB, Erhardt LRHealth-related quality of life in elderly patients with heart failure[J]. Scand Cardiovasc J.1999;33(5):278-85.
    [29]Dempster M, Donnelly M, Measuring the health related quality of life of people with ischaemic heart disease[J]. Heart.2000 Jun;83(6):641-4
    [30]Kao CW, Friedmann E, Thomas SA. Quality of life predicts one-year survival in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators[J].Qual Life Res.2010 Apr;19(3):307-15. Epub 2010 Feb 3.
    [31]Smith HJ, Taylor R, Mitchell A. A comparison of four quality of life instruments in cardiac patients:SF-36, QLI, QLMI, and SEIQoL[J]. Heart.2000 Oct;84(4):390-4.
    [32]Lewin RJ, Thompson DR, Martin CR, et al. Validation of the Cardio-vascular Limitations and Symptoms Profile (CLASP) in chronic stable angina[J].J Cardiopulm Rehabil.2002 May-Jun;22(3):184-91.
    [33]Lopez V, Chair SY, Thompson DR, et al. A psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the Cardiovascular Limitations and Symptoms Profile in patients with coronary heart disease[J]. J Clin Nurs.2008 Sep;17(17):2327-34.
    [34]Wahrborg P, Emanuelsson H. The cardiac health profile:content, reliability and validity of a new disease-specific quality of life questionnaire[J]. Coron Artery Dis. 1996 Nov;7(11):823-9.
    [35]Badia C, Roca-Cusachs A, Dalfo A, et al. Validation of the short form of the Spanish Hypertension Quality of Life Questionnaire (MINICHAL) [J]. Clin Ther. 2002:24(12):2137-54.
    [36]Melchiors AC, Correr CJ, Pontarolo R, Santos F0, Souza RA. Quality of life in hypertensive patients and concurrent validity of Minichal-Brazil[J]. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2010:94(3):337-44.
    [37]Carvalho MA, Silva IB, Ramos SB, et al, Quality of life of hypertensive patients and comparison of two instruments of HRQOL measure [J]. Arq Bras Cardiol.2012 Apr 5:0. [Epub ahead of print]
    [38]RectorT, Kubo S, Cohn J. Patients self-assessment of their congestive heart failure. Part 2:content, reliability and validity of a new measure, the Minnesota living with heart failure questionnaire [J]. Heart Failure,1987,3:198-209.
    [39]Rector T, Cohn J. Assessment of patient outcome with the Minnesota living with heart failure questionnaire:reliability and validity during a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trialof pimobendan [J]. Am Heart J,1992,124:1017-1025.
    [40]Pokushalov E, Romanov A, Corbucci G, et al. Cardiac resynchronization therapy and bone marrow cell transplantation in patients with ischemic heart failure and electromechanical dyssynchrony:a randomized pilot study [J]. Cardiovasc Transl Res.2011 Dec;4(6):767-78. Epub 2011 May 6.
    [41]Kato N, Kinugawa K, Seki S, et al. Quality of life as an independent predictor for cardiac events and death in patients with heart failure. Circ J.2011;75(7):1661-9.
    [42]Green CP, Porter CB, Bresnahan DR, Development and evaluation of the Kansas city cardiomyopathy questionnaire:a new health status measure for heart failure [J]. J Am Coll Cardiol,2000,35:1245-1255.
    [43]Reynolds MR, Magnuson EA, Lei Y, et al. Health-related quality of life after transcatheter aortic valve replacement in inoperable patients with severe aortic stenosis[J]. Circulation.2011 Nov 1;124(18):1964-72.
    [44]0'Connor CM, Whellan DJ, Wojdyla D, et al. Factors related to morbidity and mortality in patients with chronic heart failure with systolic dysfunction:the HF-ACTION predictive risk score model[J]. Circ Heart Fail.2012 Jan 1;5(1):63-71.
    [45]Spertus JA, Winders JA, Dewhurst TA, Monitoring the quality of life in patients with coronary artery disease [J].Am J cardiac,1994,7 (412):1240-1244.
    [46]Garratt AM, Hutchinson A, Russell I. The UK version of the Seattle angina questionnaire (SAQ-UK):reliability, validity and respon siveness [J]. J Clin Epidemiol, 2001,54 (9):907-915.
    [47]Spertus JA, Winder JA, Dewhurst TA, et al. Development and evaluation of the Seattle Angina Questionnaire:a new functional status-measure for coronary artery diseas [eJ] J Am Coll Cardiol,1995,25 (2):333-341.
    [48]Sun D, Narsinh K, Wang H, et al. Effect of autologous bone marrow mononuclear cells transplantation in diabetic patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction[J]. Int J Cardiol.2012 Feb 16. [Epub ahead of print]
    [49]Cohen DJ, Van Hout B, Serruys PW, et al. Quality of life after PCI with drug-eluting stents or coronary-artery bypass surgery[J]. N Engl J Med.2011 Mar 17;364(11):1016-26.
    [50]Spertus J, Dorian P, Bubien R, et al. Development and validation of the Atrial Fibrillation Effect on QualiTy-of-Life (AFEQT) Questionnaire in patients with atrial fibrillation[J].Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol.2011 Feb;4(1):15-25. Epub 2010 Dec 15.
    [51]Osbak PS, Mourier M, Kjaer A, et al.A randomized study of the effects of exercise training on patients with atrial fibrillation[J]. Am Heart J.2011 Dec;162(6):1080-7.
    [52]Rose M, Anatchkova M, Fletcher J, et al. Short and Precise Patient Self-Assessment of Heart Failure Symptoms Using a Computerized Adaptive Test (HF-CAT) [J]. Circ Heart Fail.2012 Apr 23. [Epub ahead of print]
    [53]朱燕波,折笠秀樹;郑洁;等.心功能不全QOL量表中文泽本信度效度的初步评价[J],中国行为医学科学,2004年03期,2004,13(3):337-339
    [54]刘淑红,西雅图心绞痛量表(SAQ)中文译本的信度、效度、反应度[J],天津医科大学,2003年硕十论文
    [55]曹松梅, 赵庆华, 张光慧,冠状动脉介入治疗后生存质量测定量表的信效度[J],进修护十杂志,2009,24(6):488-491
    [56]刘江生,马琛明,涂良珍,“中国心血管病人生活质量评定问卷常模”的测定[J],心血管康复医学杂志,2009,18(4):305-309
    [57]郭兰,冯建章,李河.等冠心病患者生存质量评定量表构建[J],岭南心血管病杂志2003,9(4):229-231
    [58]杨瑞雪;潘家华;万崇华,慢性病患者生命质量测定量表体系之冠心病量表的效度及反应度分析[J],中国全科医学,2007,10(21):1788-1791
    [59]马琛明,陈或,解基严,等.冠状动脉旁路移植术后生命质量评定量表的制定[J].心血管康复医学杂志,16(5):443-447
    [60]何庆勇,王阶,朱明军,等.基于冠心病心绞痛患者报告的临床结局评价量表的科学性考评[J],中华中医药杂志,2011,26(5):1138-1142
    [61]杜蕊,张哲,陈民等,冠心病稳定型心绞痛·痰瘀互结证自评量表条目筛选方法学研究[J].中华中医药学刊,2011,29(6):1265-1270
    [62]吕映华;何迎春;杨娟等,冠心病心绞痛(气虚血瘀证)症状疗效评分量表的研究[J],中国临床药理学与治疗学,2008:13(7):786-791
    [63]朱婷,毛静远,中医特色冠心病生存质量量表条目的设计思路[J],辽宁中医药大学学报,2008,10(7):11-13
    [64]朱婷;毛静远;,中医特色冠心病生存质量量表的制定及考评[J],辽宁中医杂志,35(6):854-855.
    [65]徐伟,王吉耀,PhillipsM,等.老年原发性高血压患者生活质量量表编制的商榷[J].实用老年医学,2000,14(5):242-245.
    [66]杨瑞雪,潘家华,万崇华,等.高血压患者生命质量量表制及评价[J].中国公共卫生,2008,24(3):266-269
    [67]戴霞,郭伟星,老年高血压病肾气亏虚证诊断量表的信度与效度测评[J].时珍国医国药,2010,21(9):2324-2326
    [68]郭全;陈泽奇;刘小珍;原发性高血压肝阳上亢证评定量表的初步编制及考评[J],中国临床康复,2006,10(43):20-23
    [69]林谦,农一兵,万洁,等.慢性心力衰竭中西医结合生存质量量表的临床研究[J],中国中西 医结合急救杂志,2008,15(1):131-134
    [70]逯金金,林谦,农一兵.慢性心力衰竭中西医结合生存质量量表与SF-36简明健康状况量表信度、反应度对比研究[J],中医杂志,2011,51(10):837-840
    [71]董雁逊,谭丽,王晓娟.中医食疗对高血.压患者生存质量的影响[J],中国老年学杂志,2011,31(22):4460-4461
    [72]韦延忠,中西医结合治疗高血.压病及其对生存质量的改善作用[J],中国中医急症2010,19(6):907-908
    [73]黄寰,张云,贺佩兰,厄贝沙坦联合比索洛尔对原发性高血压患者生命质量的影响[J],当代医学,2010,16(4):4-5
    [74]荆鲁;王阶;干停;西雅图量表评价血府逐瘀汤及其拆方治疗冠心病稳定性心绞痛的疗效观察[J],中国中西医结合杂志,2007,27(1):18-20
    [75]杨兴俊,四逆汤对冠心病心绞痛疗效及生活质量影响的临床研究[J],河南中医学院学报,2007,22(5):132-134
    [76]田利静,秦晔,冠心病患者非体外循环下冠状动脉旁路移植术的术后生活质量[J],中国老年学杂志2012,32(1):181-182
    [77]张叶祥指导胡业彬,温肾益心丹对老年慢性心力衰竭患者生活质量的影响[J],中国中医急症2011,20(6):866-868
    [78]汪艳丽,刘如秀,指导:刘志明,中西医结合对慢性心力衰竭患者生命质量的影响[J],中国中医药信息杂志,2011,18(3):11-13
    [79]龚开政,张振刚,张昕,明尼苏达州心力衰竭生活质量问卷与36条简明健康状况调查表对慢性心力衰竭患者生活质量的评估作用[J],中国临床康复,2005,9(28):29-31
    [80]王丽萍,永久性房颤患者治疗前后生存质量的初步研究,第一军医大学,硕十论文.36,2006年
    [81]Department of Health and Human, Services, Food and Drug Administration Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER).Center for Biologies Evaluation and Research (CBER), Center for Devices and adiological Health (CDRH). Guidance for industry patient reported outcome measures:Use in medical product development to support labeling [R].FDA,2006.
    [82]Marchesini G, Bianchi G, Amodio P, et al. Factors associated with poor health—related quality of life of patients with cirrhosis [J]. Gastroenterol,2001,120(1):170—178. [83]Bjorner JB, Kosinski M, Ware JE Jr, Using item response theory to calibrate the Headache Impact Test (HIT) to the metric of traditional headache scales. Qual Life Res[J]. 2003 Dec;12(8):981-1002.
    [84]Power M, Quinn K, Schmidt S. Development of the WHOQOL-Old Module [J]. Quality of Life Research,2005,14:2197-2214.
    [85]Martin M, Kosinski M, Bjorner JB, et al. Item response theory methods can improve the measurement of physical function by combining the modified health assessment questionnaire and the SF-36 physical function scale [J]. Quality of Life Research,2007, 16:647-660.
    [86]Pallant JF, Miller RL, Tennant A. Evaluation of the Edinburgh Post Natal Depression Scale using Rasch analysis [J]. BMC Psychiatry,2006,12:6-28.
    [87]Teresi JA, Kleinman M, Ocepek-Welikson K. Modern psychometric methods for detection of differential item functioning:Application to Cognitive Assessment Measures [J]. Statistics in Medicine,2000,19:1651-1683.