基于matK及rDNA-ITS对川西荞麦的分子系统关系研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
荞麦(buckwheat)属于蓼科(Polygonaceae),荞麦属(Fagopyrum Mill),是一种重要的杂粮兼药用植物。我国的养麦资源十分丰富,在全世界目前已报道并命名的荞麦有23个种,2个亚种和3个变种。细胞遗传学研究表明荞麦属植物存在四倍体和二倍体的染色体倍性变化。我国西南地区是荞麦的起源地之一,但荞麦研究工作起步晚,研究不够深入,对于荞麦的基础性研究如起源、演化和分类还在初始阶段,种间亲缘关系模糊不清,亟待我们进行全面系统的研究。本研究利用荞麦叶绿体matK基因及核基因组中的ITS序列对13种荞麦属植物进行了系统发育重建,并在此基础上结合形态分类系统及细胞学研究结果,获得以下结果:
     1.matK基因的研究结果表明:(1)不同的严格一致树都将栽培种和野生种清晰的划分为两大类别,五个主要分支,其自展支持率达到99%;(2)普格野生荞是野生荞麦的进化种;从整个荞麦属植物的进化关系来看,普格野生荞进化地位位于栽培荞麦和野生荞麦之间,很有可能是二者的中间类型;(3)白翅和红翅亲缘关系较远,他们各自具有独立的进化路线,白翅野生养可能是细柄野生荞的一个亚种,而红翅野生荞可能是独立于细柄野生荞而存在的一个隐存种。
     2.ITS序列研究结果表明:(1)同一物种的不同克隆并不总是聚在一起,反映了荞麦属植物的ITS序列存在较大的遗传分化,荞麦属植物的分布广、物种类群多,染色体的倍性变化可能导致其存在较大的遗传分化;(2)细胞学水平和分子水平的结果显示汶川野生荞与西昌金荞亲缘关系密切,推测汶川野生荞很可能是金荞的一个地理亚种。
     3.根据生命条码可将荞麦属分为两大类群:类群Ⅰ包括栽培种和金荞及其近缘种;类群Ⅱ主要包括野生种(羌彩野生养,普格野生荞,线叶野生荞,细柄野生荞,皱叶野生荞等)。
     4. matK与ITS序列分析结果都表明金荞与苦荞的亲缘关系更近。苦荞和野生荞麦之间可能存在一个中间类型,已搜集的材料研究表明普格野生荞可能是栽培种和野生种的过渡种。
     5.形态学、细胞学及分子水平的研究均显示白翅野生荞和红翅野生荞区别十分明显,判定二者应该是两个独立的种,可对其进行重命名。
The buckwheat,Fagopyrum of polygonaceae,is considered as one kind of coarse cereals and medicinal plants.China is rich in buckwheat resource,which was reported and named all over the world,including twenty three species,two subspecies and three variants. Cytogenetical study has proved that Fagopyrum existed with both diploid and tetraploid. China especially in southwest is one of the origin of buckwheat,but the research on buckwheat starts late and lacks of investment. The basis research,such as the evolution and the classification of buckwheat is significantly blank;phylogenetic relationship among the species in fagopyrum is undefined,so systematic research is extremely urgent.The classification and relationship of Fagopyrum have been existing controversy.In this study,phylogenetic investigation of thirteen representative buckwheat species which came from southwestern of China has been conducted based on matK gene and ITS sequence,compared with the typoiology classification and cytological analysis.The main results were as follows:
     1.The matK sequence analysis indicated that:(1)The bootstrap support of the five leading branches reached 99%.(2)The result of all data analysis showed that Fagopyrum pugense was the evolving species of wild buckwheat. Overviewing the evolutionary relationship of all of Fagopyrum, Fagopyrum pugense was situated in cultivated buckwheat and wild buckwheat,and it may be the intermediate form of the two.(3)With relatively far genetic relationship between F.gracilipes var.odontopterum W and F.gracilipes var.odontopterum R,which had their own independent revolution line,F.gracilipes var.odontopterum W may be one of the subspecies of F.gracilipes (Hemsl.) Dam.et Diels while F.gracilipes var.odontopterum R may be the cryptice that indepent from F.gracilipes (Hemsl.) Dam. et Diels.
     2.The ITS sequence analysis indicated that:(1)different clonings did not always cluster together within a species,which reflected that the ITS sequence of the fagopyrum had distinct genetic differentiation.The factor leading great differentiation may be the wide distribution of Fagopyrum,abandent species groups,or the ploidy change of chromosome.(2) The results of the molecular classification and cytological research showed the close relationship between F.wenchuanense and F.cymosum X,so we speculated that the F.wenchuanense may be a geographic subspecies of the F.cymosum.
     3.According to DNA barcode,the buckwheat could be divided into two groups:Cluster I contained cultivated species,F.cymosum and its related species; ClusterⅡcontained wild species,F.qiangcai,F.pugense,F.lineare,F.gracilipes and F.crispatifolium,etc.
     4.The results of matK and ITS sequence analysis suggested that F.cymosum had much closer genetic relationship with F.tartaricum.An transitional species,which might be Fpugense from this study,could exist between F.tartaricum and wild buckwheats.
     5.The results of morphology, cytology and molecular level studies had all shown that the distinct difference between F.gracilipes var.odontopterum W and F.gracilipes var.odontopterum R,therefore,they should be two separate sepecies and should be renamed.
引文
[1]林汝法.中国养麦[M].北京:中国农业出版社,1994:46-56
    [2]Ohnishi O.Search for the Wild Ancestor of Buckwheat I.Description of new Fagopyrum (polygonac-eae) species and their distribution in China and the Himalayan hills[J].Fagopyrum,1998,15:18-28
    [3]Ohnishi, O. and Y. Matsuoka. In preparation. Search for the wild ancestor of buckwheat. Ⅱ. Taxono-my of Fagopyrum species based on morphology,isozymes and cpDNA variability [J]. Genes & Genetic Systems,1996,71(6):383-390
    [4]Ohnishi, O. Search for the wild ancestor of buckwheat. Ⅲ. The wild ancestors of cultivated common buckwheat, Fagopyrum esculentum and of tatary buckwheat, F. tataricum[J]. Econ. Bot,1998,52(2):123-133
    [5]夏明忠,王安虎.中国四川荞麦属(蓼科)一新种—花叶野荞麦[J].西昌学院学报,2007,21(2)
    [6]刘建林,唐宇,夏明忠等.中国四川蓼科荞麦属一新种—皱叶野荞麦[J].植物分类学报,2008,46(6):929-932
    [7]Yu Tang,Mei-Liang Zhou,Da-Quan Bai,et al.Fagopyrum pugense(Polygonaceae),a New Species fr-om Sichuan, China[J]NOVON,2010,20:239-242
    [8]Shao JR, Zhou ML, Zhu XM,et al. Fagopyrum wenchuanense and Fagopyrum qiangcai, two new sp-ecies of Polygonaceae from Sichuan, China. Novon,2011,21:DOI.
    [9]杨小艳,陈惠.川西北荞麦种间亲缘关系初步研究[J]西北植物学报.2007,27(9):1752-1758
    [10]王莉花等.云南野生荞麦资源的地理分布的考察研究[J].西南农业学报,2004,17:156-159
    [11]赵佐成,周明德.中国苦荞麦原生境保存可行性的民族植物学调查[J]应用与环境生物学报,1998,4(4):320-326
    [12]王安虎,夏明忠,蔡光泽等.议栽培苦荞的地理起源中心[J]西昌学院学报(自然科学版),2008,3
    [13]陈庆富.五个中国荞麦(Fagopyrum)种的核型分析[J]广西植物,2001,21(2):107-110
    [14]Chen Q F.A study of resources of Fagopyrun (Polygonaceae) native to china[J].Botanical Journal of The Linnean Society.1999,130:53-64
    [15]Chen Q F.Wild hybridization among Fagopyrum(Polygonaceae)species native to china[J].Botanical Journal of The Linnean Society.1999,131:177-185
    [16]罗定泽,侯鑫,赵佐成.西南地区硬枝野荞麦居群的遗传多样性研究[J].武汉植物学研究,2001,19(2):107-112
    [17]王安虎,夏明忠,蔡光泽等.凉山地区金沙江河野生养麦种质资源的特征与分布规律研究[J]杂粮作物,2008,28(2):77-79
    [18]Koji Tsuji and Ohmi Ohnishi. Phylogenetic relationships among wild and cultivated Tartary buck-wheat (Fagopyrum tataricum Gaert) populations revealed by AFLP analyses[J].Genes & Genetic Syst-ems.2001.76,1:47-52
    [19]Ohnishi O.Isozyme variation in common buckwheat,F.esculentum Moench,and its related species [A].Proc.2nd. Intl. Symp.Buckwheat [C].1983,39-50
    [20]Koji Tsuji and Ohmi Ohnishi. Phylogenetic relationships among cultivated landraces anf natural Po-pulations of Tartary buckwheat (Fagopyrum tataricum Gaert.) revealed by RAPD analyses[C]proc.7th. Intl.Symp.buckwheat Vol. V,1998,pp.41-49
    [21]Koji Tsuji and Ohmi Ohnishi. Phylogenetic position of Tibetan naturalpopulations in Tartary buc- kwheat (Fagopyrum tataricum Gaert.) revealed by RAPD analyses[J]Resources Crop Evol,2000,47
    [22]NI Vavilov. Origin and geography of cultivated plants[M].1991
    [23]Kiyochika Hasikawa.Origin an spread of cultivated plants[M].1978
    [24]王安虎,夏明忠等.野生荞麦资源[M]西昌,2008
    [25]胡先骕.经济植物学[M]北京,1953
    [26]丁颖.中国水稻栽培学[M]北京:农业出版社,1961.
    [27]蒋俊芳,贾星.四川大凉山苦荞的起源地之一[J]荞麦动态,1990(1):15-20
    [28]叶能干,苟光前.中国荞麦属的分类、起源与演化[J]荞麦动态,1993(1):25-30
    [29]赵佐成,周明德,王中仁等.中国苦荞麦及其近缘种的遗传多样性研究[J]遗传学报,2002,29(8):723-734
    [30]李安仁等.中国植物志[M]科学出版社,1998
    [31]朱凤绥,林汝法,李永青等.荞麦不同类型的染色体研究初报[J].细胞生物学杂志,1984,6(3):130-131
    [32]杨玉霞.荞麦种质资源遗传多样性研究[博士论文]四川农业大学,2008年7月
    [33]柏大全.四川西部地区荞麦资源细胞学及遗传标记研究[硕士论文]四川农业大学,2009年7月
    [34]高洪君,侯旭光等.六种荞麦过氧化物酶同工酶研究初报[J]哲里木畜牧学院学报,1994,4(2):53-56
    [35]赵刚,唐宇.荞麦过氧化物同功酶研究[J]荞麦动态,1990,(2):10-15
    [36]Takanori OHSAKO,Shuichi FUKUOKA,Hari Prasad BIMBJ, et al.Phylogenetic analysis of the genus Fagopyrum (Polygonaceae), including the Nepali species F.megacarpum,based on nucleotide sequence of the rbcL-accD region in chloroplast DNA[J].Fagopyrum,2001,18:9-14
    [37]Vadim Goremykin,Vera Bobrova,Jens Pahnke, et al.Noncoding Sequences from the Slowly Evolving Chloroplast Inverted Repeat in Addition to rbcL Data Do Not Support Gnetalean Affinities of Angiosperms[J].Mol.Biol.Evol,1996,13(2):383-396
    [38]Yasuo Y,Ohmi O.Phylogenetic relationships among Fagopyrum species revealed by the nucleotide sequences of the ITS region of the nuclear rRNA gene[J].Genes Genet Syst,1998,73(4):201-210
    [39]Wei SUN,Zhong-Ze ZHOU,Ming-Zhen,et al.Reappraisal of the generic status of Pteroxygonum (Polygonaceae) on the basis of morphology, anatomy and nrDNA ITS sequence analysis[J].Journal of Systematics and Evolution,2008,46(1):73-79
    [40]Ohmi Ohnishi and Yasuo Yasui.Search for wild buckwheat species in high mountain regions of Yunnan and Sichuan provinces of China[J].Fagopyrum,1998,15:8-17
    [41]Maria D Logacheva, Tahir H Samigullin.Comparative chloroplast genomics and phylogenetics of Fagopyrum esculentum ssp. ancestrale-A wild ancestor of cultivated buckwheat[J].BMC Plant Biology,2008,8:59
    [42]Yasuo Yasui and Ohmi Ohnishi. Intraspecific cpDNA variations of diploid and tetraploid perennial buckwheat, Fagopyrum cymosum (Polygonaceae)[J].American Journal of Botany,2003,9(3):339-346
    [43]王莉花,殷富有等.利用RAPD分析云南野生荞麦资源的多样新和亲缘关系[J].荞麦动态,2004(2):7-15
    [44]Yasuo Yasui, Yingjie Wang.Amplified fragment length polymorphism linkage analysis of common buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum) and its wild self-pollinated relative Fagopyrum homotropicum[J]. Genome,2004,47:345-351
    [45]王安虎,夏明忠,蔡光泽等.栽培苦荞麦的起源及其近缘种亲缘分析[J].西南农业学报,2008,21(2)
    [46]汪小全,洪德元.植物分子系统学近五年的研究进展概况[J].植物分类学报,1997,35(5):465-480
    [47]郑小艳.基于多种DNA序列和cpSSR的梨属(Pyrus L.)植物分子系统关系研究[博士论文]浙江大学,2008年7月
    [48]薛华杰.基于ITS序列探讨东亚当归属的系统框架与法落海、紫花前胡等的系统地位[硕士论文]南京师范大学,2007年6月
    [49]M Kimura.Evolutionary rate at the molecula level.Nature,1968
    [50]Soltis, D.E.,Solits, P.S.Choosing an approach and an appropriate gene for phylogenetic analysis.In: Molecular Systematics of Plants Ⅱ:DNA Sequencing.Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston,1998,1-42.
    [51]Albach D. C. P. S. Soltis D. E. Soltis R. G.Olmstead 2001b Phylogenetic analysis of the Asteridae s.l. using sequences of four genes[J]. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 88:163-212
    [52]Chris Brinegar.Assessing evolution and biodiversity in plants at the molecular level[J].Kathmandy universityl journal of science,engineering and technology.2009,5(11):149-159
    [53]YCF Su,JB Mols,W Takeuchi.Reassessing the generic status of Petalolophus (Annonaceae):eviden-ce for the evolution of a distinct sapromyophilous lineage within Pseuduvaria[J].Systematic botany.2005,30(3):494-502
    [54]YCF Su, T Chaowasku.An extended phylogeny of Pseuduvaria (Annonaceae) with descriptions of three new species and a reassessment of the generic status of Oreomitra [J].Systematic Botany, 2010-BioOne
    [55]吴菲菲,张志宏,代红艳.浅谈叶绿体基因组分析技术在植物系统学中的应用[J].中国西部科技.2008,20(7):30-33
    [56]Chris Brinegar.Assessing evolution and biodiversity in plants at the molecular level[J].Kathmandy universityl journal of science,engineering and technology,2009,5(11):149-159
    [57]Ochieng JW, Henry RJ, Baverstock PR, et al.Nuclear ribosomal pseudogenes resolve a corroborated monophyly of the eucalypt genus Corymbia despite misleading hypotheses at functional ITS paralogs[J] Mol Phylogenet Evol,2007,44:752-764.
    [58]赵寿元.现代遗传学[M].高等教育出版社,2001
    [59]庞晓慧.植物DNA条形码序列筛选与鉴定研究--以裸子植物、蔷薇科/大戟科为例[博士论文]中国医学科学院,2010年5月
    [60]W.John Kress,Kenneth J.Wurdack.Use of DNA barcodes to identify flowering plants[J].PNAS, 2005,102(23):8369-8374
    [61]Shilin Chen,Hui Yao.Validation of the ITS2 Region as a Novel DNA Barcode for Identifying Medicinal Plant Species[J].Plos one,2010,5(1)
    [62]Neuhaus H,Link G.The chloroplast tRNA(Lys)(UUU)gene from mustard (Sinapisalba) contains a class II intron potentially encoding for a maturase-related polypeptide[J].Curr Genet,1987,11:251-257
    [63]Ems SC,Morden CW.Transcription,splicing and editing of plastid RNAs in the nonphotosynthetic plant Epifagus virginiana[J].Plant Mol Biol,1995,29:721-733
    [64]Aaron M. Duffy, Scot A. Kelchner, Paul G. Wolf.Conservation of selection on matK following an a-ncient loss of its flanking intron[J].Gene,2009,438:17-25
    [65]Stefan Wanke.M. Alejandra Jaramillo.Evolution of Piperales-matK gene and trnK intron sequence data reveal lineage specific resolution contrast[J].Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution,2007,42:477-497
    [66]Pang Qi-hua, Yan Ping.Identification of alpinia of ficinarum hance and its adulterant based on matK gene sequences[J]. Journal of shaanxi university of science & Technology,2008,26(4)
    [67]Vadim Goremykin,Vera Bobrova,Jens Pahnke, et al.Noncoding Sequences from the Slowly Evolving Chloroplast Inverted Repeat in Addition to rbcL Data Do Not Support Gnetalean Affinities of Angiosperms[J].Mol.Biol.Evol,1996,13(2):383-396
    [68]N.Techen,S.L.Crockettl,I.A.Khan,et al.Authentication of Medicinal Plants Using Molecular Biology Techniques to Compliment Conventional Methods[J].Current Medicinal Chemistry,2004,11: 1391-1401
    [69]李晓贤,周浙昆.单子叶植物高级分类阶元系统演化matK、rbcL和18SrDNA序列的证据[J].植物分类学报,2007,45(2):113-133
    [70]Soltis D E,Kuzoff R K,et al.matK and rbcL genen sequence data indicate that Saxifraga(Saxifragac-eae) is polyphyletic[J].Amer J Bot,1996,83:371-382
    [71]于文光,樊守金.基于叶绿体trnL-F序列以及matK序列探讨虎杖属与西伯利亚蓼的系统学位置[J].植物分类学报,2008,46(5):676-681
    [72]曹晖,蔡金娜,刘玉萍等.蛇床子地理分布与叶绿体matK基因序列的相关性分析[J].中国中药杂志,2001,26(2):90-96
    [73]滕艳芬,吴晓俊,徐红.石斛及其常见混淆品的matK基因序列比较[J].中国药科大学学报,2002,33(4):280-283
    [74]章群,聂湘平,施苏华.连香树科及其近缘植物matK序列分析和系统学意义[J].生态科学,2003,22(2):113-115
    [75]徐凤霞.木兰族和含笑族的系统学关系—基于叶绿体matK基因序列分析[J].西北植物学报2003,23(7):1169-1172
    [76]潘恒昶,施苏华,金虹等.拟单性木兰属近缘植物matK基因的序列分析[J].中山大学学报,1999,38(3):62-67
    [77]Jurado-Rivara JA,Vogler AP,et al.DNA barcoding insect-host plant associations[J].Proc Biol Sci,2009,276(1657):639-648
    [78]Valentini A,Pompanon F,Taberlet P.DNA barcoding for ecologists[J].Trends Ecol Evol,2009,24(2): 110-117
    [79]Koichiro Tamura.Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (MEGA)Software Version 4.0
    [80]Masotoshi Nei,Sudhir Kumar.Molecular Evolutionary and Phylogenetics.OXFORD university press.2000
    [81]Sudhir Kumar,Masatoshi Nei,Joel Dudley et al.A biologist-centric software for evolutionary analys-is of DNA and protein sequences.Briefings in bioinformatics,2008,(9)4:299-306
    [82]Wang Dezhou Shao Jirong.Karyotype analysis on six species of buckwheat[J]Advances in buckwh-eat research,2010.7