太湖生物区系特征及其与我国湖泊水质基准推导的关系
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
本文通过文献调研对太湖和北美五大湖的生物区系特征进行分析,并研究美国、加拿大、欧盟、荷兰以及澳大利亚和新西兰等国家水质基准推导的物种选择和数据要求,,结合太湖生物区系特征,从保护水生生物水质基准、保护人体健康水质基准、保护野生生物水质基准和沉积物质量基准等四方面提出我国湖泊水质基准推导所需要的物种选择和数据要求。本研究对全面了解太湖生物区系有较好参考价值,为我国淡水生物区系和水质基准研究提供重要的指导和借鉴意义。
     通过分析,太湖共有水生生物146科442种,各类生物种类数量相当,其中鱼类25科107种,以鲤科鱼类为主体;底栖动物21科66种,摇蚊科和颤蚓科等种类较多;浮游动物37科103种,臂尾轮虫科、溞科和剑水蚤科等种类较多;浮游植物29科81种,蓝藻门、绿藻门和硅藻门等种类较多;水生植物34科85种,蓼科和禾本科等种类较多。我国有淡水藻类9000多种;浮游动物2700多种;鱼类1000余种;底栖动物900多种;水生植物400多种。北美五大湖有鱼类134种,底栖动物165种,浮游动物132种以及浮游植物1456种,浮游植物种类远多于其他三类生物,鱼类以鲑科和鲤科种类最多。
     各国水质基准推导的物种选择和数据要求为:对于水生生物水质基准,美国规定至少选择来自3门8科的水生生物,加拿大规定至少选择3种鱼类、3种无脊椎动物以及一种水生植物或藻类,澳大利亚和新西兰要求至少选择4个类群的5个物种,荷兰要求选择至少4个类群的物种,欧盟要求选择至少8个类群的10个物种;对于野生生物水质基准,美国规定选择2种哺乳动物和3种鸟类,加拿大规定至少选择3种哺乳动物和2种鸟类;对于沉积物质量基准,加拿大规定至少选择2种无脊椎动物,荷兰和欧盟要求至少选择10个底栖动物。
     我国湖泊水质基准推导所需的物种选择和数据要求为:水生生物水质基准推导至少选择鲤鱼科、银鱼科、溞科、臂尾轮科、摇蚊科、蚬科、颤蚓科以及一种最敏感水生植物或藻类;人体健康水质基准推导需要考虑所有可食用鱼贝类;推导野生生物水质基准,至少选择四种鸟类和一种哺乳动物;推导沉积物质量基准至少选择6种底栖动物。
The aquatic biota characteristics of Taihu Lake in China and Great Lakes in North America were analyzed via literature review in this study. And the species selection and data requirements of water quality criteria derivation documents from America, Canada, Europe, Netherlands, Australia and New Zealand were studied. Considering the aquatic biota characteristics of Taihu Lake, the species selection and data requirements for the Chinese lakes water quality criteria including aquatic life criteria, human health criteria, wildlife criteria and sediment quality criteria were determined. This study would provide theory basis for species selection in the procedure of water quality criteria derivation and might be of great importance for the water quality criteria research in China.
     The results revealed that there are 442 species in 146 families in the Taihu Lake, and the species numbers of fish, zoobenthos, zooplankton, phytoplankton and hydrophyte were 107species in 25 families,66 species in 21 families,103 species in 37 families,81 species in 29 families and 85 species in 34 families respectively. For the whole Chinese fresh aquatic biota, the species numbers of fish, zoobenthos, zooplankton, phytoplankton and hydrophyte were 1023,927,2716,9000 and 437, respectively. Cyprinid fish being the dominant species was the main characteristic of both Taihu Lake and Chinese freshwater fish fauna. The North America Great lakes contained fish 134 species, zoobenthos 165 species, zooplankton 132 species and phytoplankton 1456 species, and the phytoplankton species number was much more larger than others. The dominant species in the Great Lakes fish fauna were cyprinid and Salmonidae.
     Species selection and data requirements for deriving water quality criteria in America, Europe, Canada, Netherlands, Australia and New Zealand were extensively studied. For the aquatic life criteria, aquatic organisms at least in eight different families from three phyla were needed in America; in Canada, at least three fish, three invertebrates, and one aquatic macrophytes (or algae) were needed; in Australian and New Zealand, at least five species from four different taxonomic groups were needed and at least four species in Netherlands; and in Europe at least ten species from eight different taxonomic groups were needed. For the human health criteria, the Species selection and data requirements were not clearly determined. For the wildlife criteria, two mammalian species and three avian species were needed in America, and in Canada at least three mammalian species and two avian species were needed. For the sediment quality criteria, at least two invertebrates were needed in Canada, and in Netherlands and Europe at least ten benthic invertebrates were needed.
     The species selection and data requirements needed in the water quality derivation procedure for Chinese lakes were determined as followed. For aquatic life criteria, the aquatic organisms at least from eight families needed were cyprinidae, salangidae, chironomidae, corbiculidae, tubificidae, branchionidae, daphnidae, and one sensitive hydrophyte or algae. For the human health criteria, all the esculent fish and shellfish needed to be considered. For the wildlife criteria, at least one mammalian species and three avian species were needed. For the sediment quality criteria, six families from benthic invertebrates including corbiculidae, lymnaeidae, palaemonidae, chironomidae, tubificidae, and glossiphoniinae needed to be selected.
引文
鲍建平,陈辉.太湖的浮游动物[J].淡水渔业,1983,6:33-38.
    鲍建平,缪为民,李劫夫,等.太湖水生维管束植物及其合理开发利用的调查研究[J].大连水产学院学报,1991,6(1):13-20.
    蔡永久,龚志军,秦伯强.太湖软体动物现存量及空间分布格局(2006-2007年)[J].湖泊科学,2009,21(5):713-719.
    蔡永久,龚志军,秦伯强.太湖大型底栖动物群落结构及多样性[J1.生物多样性,2010,18(1):50-59.
    曹萃禾.太湖水生维管束植物资源变动及其对鱼产力的影响[J].淡水渔业,1990,6:30-32.
    曹宇静,吴丰昌.淡水中重金属镉的水质基准制定[J].安徽农业科学,2010,38(3):1378-1380,1437.
    崔心红.水生植物概念、类型及特征[J].园林,2008,11:16-19.
    陈静生,王飞越.关于水体沉积物质量基准问题[J].环境化学,1992,11(3):60-70.
    陈立侨,刘影,杨再福,等.太湖生态系统的演变与可持续发展[J].华东师范大学学报(自然科学版),2003,4:99-106.
    陈云增,杨浩,张振克,等.淡水水体沉积物环境质量基准差异分析[J].湖泊科学,2005,17(3):193-201.
    陈云增,杨浩,张振克,等.水体沉积物环境质量基准建立方法研究进展[J].地球科学进展,2006,21(1):53-61.
    陈云增,杨浩,张振克,等.相平衡法在滇池沉积物环境质量评价中的应用研究[J].环境科学学报,2006,26(9):1545-1552.
    陈伟民,秦伯强.太湖梅梁湾冬末春初浮游动物时空变化及其环境意义[J].湖泊科学,1998,10(4):10-16.
    邓思明,藏增嘉,詹鸿禧,等.太湖敞水区鱼类群落结构特征和分析[J].水产学报,1997,21(2):134-142.
    堵南山,赖伟,邓雪怀.太湖枝角类季节变化的初步研究[J].海洋与湖泊,1964,6(2):193-204.
    范成新,黄漪平,鲍建平.太湖营养元素的变化与浮游生物的演变[J].中国科学院南京地理与湖泊研究所集刊,1992,9:37-47.
    范成新.太湖水体生态环境历史演变[J].湖泊科学,1996,8(4):297-304.
    国家环境保护总局.中国生物多样性国情研究报告[M].北京:中国环境科学出版社,1998.
    何志辉.淡水生物和淡水渔业讲座[J].淡水渔业,1982,2:36-39.
    黄钥,吴群河.水体沉积物质量基准问题的研究进展[J].环境评价和检测,2003(增):24-27.
    胡鸿钧,魏印心.中国淡水藻类—系统、分类及生态[M].北京:科学出版社,2006.
    金相灿.中国湖泊水库环境调查研究[M].中国环境科学出版社.1985.
    金小伟,雷炳莉,许宜平,等.水生态基准方法学概述及建立我国水生态基准的探讨[J].生态毒理学报,2009,4(5):609-616.
    金小伟,查金苗,许宜平,等.3种氯酚类化合物对河蚬的毒性和氧化应激[J].生态毒理学报,2009,4(6):816-822.
    孔繁翔.环境生物学[M].高等教育出版社.2000.
    雷炳莉,金小伟,黄圣彪,等.太湖流域3种氯酚类化合物水质基准的探讨[J].生态毒理学报,2009,4(1):40-49.
    雷泽湘,徐德兰,黄沛生,等.太湖沉水和浮叶植被及其水环境效应研究[J].生态环境,2006,15(2):239-243.
    李巧,陈又清,郭萧,等.节肢动物作为生物指示物对生态恢复的评价[J].中南林学院学报,2006,26(3):117-122.
    李任伟.沉积物和环境沉积学[J].地球科学进展,1998,13(4):388-402.
    李湘涛.中国的珍惜动物[M].湖南教育出版社,2005.
    刘恩生,吴林坤,曹萍,等.太湖鱼类渔获量和优势种年龄组成的变化规律及下行效应分析[J]湖泊科学,2005,32(4):471-477.
    刘建康.高级水生生物学[M].科学出版社.2002.
    刘文新,汤鸿霄.区域沉积物质量基准常用建立方法的改进与优化[J].中国环境科学,1997,17(3):220-224.
    马陶武,黄清辉,王海,等.太湖水质评价中底栖动物综合生物指数的筛选及生物基准的确立[J].生态学报,2008,28(3):1192-1200.
    梅洪,赵先富,郭斌,等.中国淡水藻类生物多样性研究进展[J].生态科学,2003,22(4):356-359.
    孟伟,张远,郑丙辉.水环境质量基准、标准与流域水污染物总量控制[J].环境科学研究,2006,19(3):1-6.
    孟伟,刘征涛,张楠,等.流域水质目标管理技术研究(Ⅱ)——水环境基准、标准与总量控制[J].环境科学研究,2008,21(1):1-8.
    盂伟,闫振广,刘征涛.美国水质基准技术分析与我国相关基准的构建[J].环境科学研究,2009,22(7):757-761.
    盂伟,吴丰昌.水质基准的理论与方法学导论[M].北京:科学出版社,2010.
    倪勇,朱德全.太湖鱼类志[M].上海:上海科学技术出版社,2005.
    钱奎梅,陈宇炜,宋晓兰.太湖浮游植物优势种长期演化与富营养化进程的关系[J].生态科学,2008,27(2):65-70.
    钱国桢,朱家贤.太湖野鸭的动物群落学[J].华东师范大学学报,1980,(3):40-57.
    盛和林,大泰司纪之,陆厚基.中国野生哺乳动物[M].北京:中国林业出版社,1999.
    沈韫芬.中国淡水原生动物多样性及其所受威胁[J].生物多样性,1998,6(2):81-86.
    王荐.太湖浮游植物与富营养化[J].无锡教育学院学报,2000,20(3):90-92.
    王骥,王建.浮游植物的采集、计数与定量方法[J].水库渔业,1982,4:58-63.
    吴丰昌,孟伟,宋永会,等.中国湖泊水环境基准的研究进展[J].环境科学学报,2008,28(12)2385-2393.
    吴丰昌,孟伟,张瑞卿,等.保护淡水水生生物硝基苯水质基准研究[J].环境科学研究院,2011a,24(1):1-10.
    吴丰昌,孟伟,曹宇静,等.镉的淡水水生生物水质基准研究[J].环境科学研究院,2011b,24(2):172-184.
    夏青,陈艳卿,刘宪兵.水质基准与水质标准[M].北京:中国标准出版社,2004.
    谢建军.太湖上游南溪水系水质生物评价研究[D].南京农业大学,2007.
    徐润林.太湖北部区域的浮游纤毛虫[J].中山大学学报,1996,35(suppl 2):101-104.
    杨桂军.太湖三个湖区浮游动物群落结构周年变化的比较研究[D].华中农业大学,2005.
    杨桂军,秦伯强,高光,等.太湖不同湖区轮虫群落结构季节变化的比较研究[J].环境科学,2008,29(10):2963-2970.
    闫振广,孟伟,刘征涛,等.我国淡水水生生物镉基准研究[J].环境科学学报,29(11):2393-2406.
    庾钰荣,盛建泉,胡宁霞,等.论东太湖水生野生植物资源的保护及可持续发展对策.[J]农业科技管理,2008,27(4):18-20.
    张爱菊,叶金云,尹文林,等.水华爆发前后南太湖底栖动物的比较研究[J].水生态学杂志,2010,3(1):56-59.
    张圣照.王国祥.濮培民.东太湖水生植被及其沼泽化趋势[J].植物资源与环境,1999,8(2):1-6.
    张彤,金洪钧.美国对水生态基准的研究[J].上海环境科学,1996,15(3):7-9.
    张彤,金洪钧.乙腈的水生态基准[J].水生生物学报,1997a,21(3):226-233.
    张彤,金洪钧.丙烯腈水生态基准研究[J].环境科学学报,1997b,17(1):75-81.
    张彤,金洪钧.硫氰酸钠的水生态基准研究[J].应用生态学报,1997c,8(1):99-103.
    张迎梅,阮禄章,董元华,等.无锡太湖地区夜鹭及白鹭繁殖生物学研究[J].动物学研究,2000,21(4):275-278.
    张瑞卿,吴丰昌,李会仙,等.中外水质基准发展趋势和存在的问题[J].生态学杂志,2010,29(10):2049-2056.
    赵光美.中国鸟类分类与分布名录[M].科学出版社,2005.
    赵肯堂,陆瑜德,浦林宝,等.苏州—无锡地区鸟类调查[J].铁道师院学报,1990,7(1):46-61.
    郑炳辉,田自强,张雷,等.太湖西岸湖滨带水生生物分布特征及水质营养状况[J].生态学报,2007,27(10):4214-422.
    中国科学院水生生物研究所.中国生物多样性信息系统内陆水体生物学分布[EB/OL].湖北:武汉,2011[2011-03-11]. http://brim.ihb.ac.cn/10/CN/10.asp.
    中国科学院南京地理研究所.太湖综合调查初步报告[M].北京:科学出版社,1965.
    周启星,王如松.乡镇城镇化水污染的生态风险及北京警戒值的研究[J].应该生态学报,1997,8(3):309-313.
    周启星,罗义,祝凌燕.环境基准值的科学研究与我国环境标准的修订[J].农业环境科学学报,2007,26(1):1-5.
    朱松泉.2002-2003年太湖鱼类学调查[J].湖泊科学,2004,16(2):120-123.
    朱松泉,刘正文,谷孝鸿.太湖鱼类区系变化和渔获物分析[J].湖泊科学,2007,19(6):664-669.
    朱松泉.中国淡水鱼类检索[M].南京:江苏科学技术出版社,1995.
    ANZECC&ARMCANZ. Australian and New Zealand guidelines for fresh and marine water quality[R]. Canberra, Australia: Australian and New Zealand Environment and Conservation Council and Agriculture and Resource Management Council of Australia and New Zealand. 2000.
    Bailey R M, Smith G R. Origin and geography of the fish fauna of the Laurentian Great Lakes Basin[J]. Fish. Res. Board Can,1981,38:1539-1561.
    Baranthouse L W. Qualifying population recovery rates for ecological risk assessment[J]. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry,2004,23(2):500-508.
    CCREM(Canadian Council of Resource and Environment Ministers). Canadian water quality guidelines[R]. Prepared By the Task Force on Water Quality Guidelines.1987.
    CCME. Protocols for the derivation water quality guidelines for the protection of agricultural water uses[R]. Canadian Environmental Quality Guidelines. Ottawa, Canada: Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment.1993.
    CCME. Protocol for the derivation of canadian sediment quality guidelines for the protection of aquatic life[R]. CCME-PEC-98E. Prepared by Environment Canada, Guidelines Division, Technical Secretarait of the CCME Task Group on Water Quality Guidelines, Ottawa,1995.
    CCME. Protocol for the derivation of Canadian tissue residue guidelines for the protection of wildlife that consume aquatic biota[R]. CCME, Winnipeg,1998.
    CCME. Canadian water quality guidelines for the protection of aquatic life:introduction[R]. Winnipeg, Manitoba:Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment.1999a.
    CCME. A protocol for the derivation of canadian sediment quality guidelines for the protection of aquatic life[R]. Canadian Environmental Quality Guidelines. Ottawa, Canada:Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment.1999b.
    CCME. Canadian sediment quality guidelines for the protection of aquatic life:introduction, updated in Canadian environmental quality guidelines 1999[R]. Winnipeg, Manitoba.2001.
    CCME. A protocol for the derivation of water quality guidelines for the protection of aquatic life 2007[R]. Canadian Environmental Quality Guidelines. Ottawa, Canada:Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment.2007.
    CCME. Canadian water quality guidelines[R]. Environment Canada/Ecosystem Conservation Directorate/Evaluation and Interpretation Branch/Guidelines Division/Ottawa, Ontario/ KlA0H3(819)953-1553.2008.
    Chapman P M. Current app roaches to develop ing sediment quality criteria [J]. Environm ental Toxicology and Chem istry,1989,8:589-599.
    CUDMORE-VOKEY B, CROSSMAN E J. Checklists of the fish fauna of the laurentian Great Lakes and their connecting channels [R]. Burlington, Canada:Great Lakes Laboratory for Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences Fisheries and Oceans Canada,2000.
    Yin D Q, Jin H J, Yu L W, et al. Deriving freshwater quality criteria for 2,4-dichlorophenol for protection of aquatic life in China[J]. Environmental Pollution,2003a,122:217-222.
    Yin D Q, Jin H J, Yu L W, et al. Deriving freshwater quality criteria for 2,4,6-trichlorophenol for protection of aquatic life in China[J]. Environmental Pollution,2003b,52:67-73.
    David J J, Janice P. Fish utilization of great lakes coastal wetlands[J]. Great lakes Res,1992,18(4): 651-672.
    Dobbs M G. Evaluation of resident-species procedure for deriving site-specific water quality criteria for copper in blaine creek, Kentucky[J]. Environ. Toxical. Chen,1994,13(6):963-971.
    ECB. Technical guidance document on risk assessment in support of commission directive 93/67/eec on risk assessment for new notified substances, commission regulation (ec) no.1488/94 on risk assessment for existing substances and directive 98/8/ec of the European parliament and of the council concerning the placing of biocidal products on the market. part ii. environmental risk assessment[R]. Ispra, Italy: European Chemicals Bureau, European Commission Joint Research Center, European Communities.2003.
    Goodyear C D, Edsall T A, Ormsby D, et al. Atlas of the spawning and nursery areas of Great Lakes fishes. Vol.2: Lake Superior[R]. Washington DC:U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service,1982a.
    Goodyear C D, Edsall T A, Ormsby D, et al. A tlas of the spawning and nursery areas of Great Lakes fishes. Vol.5:Lake Huron[R]. Washington DC:U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service,1982b.
    Goodyear C D, Edsall T A, Ormsby D, et al. Atlas of the spawning and nursery areas of Great Lakes fishes. Vol.9:Lake Erie[R]. Washington DC:U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service,1982c.
    Goodyear C D, Edsall T A, Ormsby D, et al. Atlas of the spawning and nursery areas of Great Lakes fishes. Vol.11:Lake Ontario[R]. Washington DC:U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.1982d.
    Goodyear C D, Edsall T A, Ormsby D, et al. Atlas of the spawning and nursery areas of Great Lakes fishes. Vol.4:Lake Michigan[R]. Washington DC:U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.1982e.
    Hubbs C L, Lagler K F. Fishes of the Great Lakes region. Bull. Cranbrook Inst.Sci,1947.
    Marsh M C. The effect of some industrial wastes on fishes[J[. Water Supply and Irrigation Paper No. 192. US Geological Survey,1907:337-348.
    NAS, NAE(National Academy of Science and National Academy of Engineering). Water quality criteria[M]. Washington DC:US Government Printing Office,1974.
    NATC(National Technical Advisory Committee to the Secretery of the Interior). Water Quality Criteria[R]. Washington DC:US Department of the Interior,1968.
    Powers E B. The goldfish(Carassius carassius) as a test animal in the study of toxicity[J]. Illinois Biological Monographs,1918,4(2):69-73.
    RIVM. Guidance document on deriving environmental risk limits in the netherlands[R]. Report No.601501012. Bilthoven, The Netherlands:National Institute of Public Health and the Environment.2001.
    RIVM. Guidance for the derivation of environmental risk limits within the frameworkof'International and national environmental quality standards for substances in the Netherlands'(INS)[R]. Report No.601782001. Bilthoven, The Netherlands:National Institute of Public Health and the Environment.2007.
    Shelford V E. An experimental study of the effects of gas wastes upon fishes, with especial reference to stream pollution[J]. Bulletin of the Illinois State Laboratory of Natural History,1917, 11:381-412.
    Underhill J C. The distribution of Minnesota fishes and late Pleistocene glaciations[J]. Minnesota Academy of Science,1989,55:32-37.
    US EPA. Quality criteria for water[R]. Washington DC:National Technical Information Service,1976.
    US EPA. Ambient water quality criteria(series) [R]. Washington DC:US EPA,1980.
    US EPA. Guidelines for deriving numerical national water quality criteria for the protection of aquatic organisms and their uses[R]. National Technical Information Service Accession Number PB85-227049. Washington, DC:U.S.Environmental Protection Agency.1985.
    US EPA. Quality criteria for water[R]. Washington DC:Office of Water Regulations and Standards, 1986a.
    US EPA. Ambient water quality for bacteria[R]. Washington DC20460:Office of Water, regulations and standards criteria and standards division. EPA440/5-84-002,1986b.
    US EPA. Technical basis for deriving sediment quality criteria for nonionic organic contaminants for the protection of benthic organisms by using Equilibrium Partitioning[R]. Office of Water(WH-553), EPA-822-R-93-011.1993a.
    US EPA. Sediment quality criteria for the protection of benthic organisms:Acenaphthene[R]. Office of Science and Technology, EPA-822-R-93-013.1993b.
    US EPA. Sediment quality criteria for the protection of benthic organisms:Dieldrin[R]. Office of Science and Technology, EPA-822-R-93-015.1993c.
    US EPA. Sediment quality criteria for the protection of benthic organisms:Endrin[R]. Office of Science and Technology, EPA-822-R-93-016.1993d.
    US EPA. Sediment quality criteria for the protection of benthic organisms:Fluoranthene[R]. Office of Science and Technology, EPA-822-R-93-012.1993e.
    US EPA. Sediment quality criteria for the protection of benthic organisms:Phenanthrene[R]. Office of Science and Technology, EPA-822-R-93-014.1993f.
    US EPA. Great Lakes water quality initiative technical support document for wildlife criteria[R]. Office of Water. Washington, DC. EPA-820-B-95-009.1995a.
    US EPA. Tittle 40:Protection of environment, Part 132-water qualtiy guidance for the Great Lakes system[R].60 FR15378.1995b.
    US EPA. Terms of Environment:Glossary, Abbreviations and Acronyms [EB/OL]. [2006-10-02]. http://www.epa.gov/OCEPAterms/.1997.
    US EPA. Great Lakes monitoring [EB/OL]. United States Environmental Protection Agency, 2010[2010-02-08]. http://epa.gov/greatlakes/glindicators/biology.html.
    US EPA. National strategy for the development of regional nutrient criteria[R]. Office of Water. EPA-822-R-98-002,1998.
    US EPA. Methodlogy for deriving ambient water quality criteria for the protection of human health [R]. Office of Water, Office of Science and Technology, EPA-822-B-00-004,2000a.
    US EPA. Nutrient criteria technical guidance mannual:lakes and reservoirs[R]. Washington DC20460: Office of Water, Office of Science and Technology. EPA-822-B00-001,2000b.
    US EPA. nutrient criteria technical guidance mannual:rivers and streams[R]. Washington DC20460: Office of Water, Office of Science and Technology. EPA-822-B00-002,2000c.
    US EPA. Nutrient criteria technical guidance mannual:wetlands[R]. Washington DC20460:Office of Water, Office of Science and Technology. EPA-822-B00-003,2000d.
    US EPA. Nutrient criteria technical guidance mannual:estuarine and coastal marine waters[R]. Washington DC20460:Office of Water, Office of Science and Technology. EPA-822-B00- 004, 2000e.
    US EPA. Methodlogy for deriving ambient water quality criteria for the protection of human health. technical support document volume 2:development of national bioaccumulation factors [R]. Office of Water. Washington, DC. EPA/822/R-03/030.2000f.
    US EPA. National recommended water quality criteria for the protection of human health. [EB/OL]. http://www.epa.gov/EPA-WATER/2003/December/Day-31/w32211.thm.2003.
    US EPA. An introduction to freshwater fishes as biological indicators[R]. Washington, DC 20460: Office of Information Analysis and Access, Office of Environmental Information. EPA-260-R-08-016,2008.
    WHO. Guidelines for drinking-water quality[R]:Incorporating 1st and 2nd Addenda,Vol.1, Recormmendations,3rd edition. Geneva: World Health Organization.2008.
    Williams J E, Johnson J E, Hendrickson D A, et al. Fishes of North America Endangered, Threatened, or of Special Concern. Fisheries,1989,14:2-20.
    Zhang T, Jin H J, Zhu H L. Qulify crieteria of acrylonitrile for the protection of aquatic life in China[J]. Chemosphere,1996,32(10):2083-2093.