城市住房价格波动差异及连锁反应研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
住房市场的价格波动不仅影响到人们的居住质量和生活水平,对家庭财富总量也有很大影响,并且关系到国民经济发展和社会和谐稳定。近十年来,随着住房分配制度改革的深化,我国住房市场得到快速发展,城市住房价格也同时大幅度上涨。从全国范围看来,一些沿海城市房价水平高,住房价格上涨尤为突出,其波动更容易引起全国人民的广泛关注。而内陆城市总体房价水平低,部分城市近年正呈追赶之势。那么,为何沿海城市房价上涨更快?一些内陆城市近年上涨幅度增大是否受其影响?房价波动的影响因素和原因是什么?住房市场价格波动是否受到心理预期的影响?目前已有学者对我国城市住房价格水平的影响因素,住房价格的投机波动特点等进行了实证研究,但较少关注城市间房价的波动差异。国外住房市场实证研究中对连锁反应的存在与否不同国家和地区有着不一致的结论,国内的新闻舆论中也有各地房价“联动”与“轮动”一说,但目前尚缺乏规范的经验研究。本文试图探讨城市间住房价格波动的差异,并考察我国住房市场是否存在价格的连锁反应。
     在梳理了国内外学者关于住房价格、住房价格波动相关研究的基础上,本文建立了通过自相关和空间相关两个维度考察城市住房价格波动的分析框架,解释住房价格波动的产生机制。通过收集1995年以来我国35个大中城市住房价格和城市经济数据资料,对我国城市住房价格波动的差异及联系进行了实证研究。在住房价格短期波动差异研究中,在城市房价水平影响因素分析的基础上,通过构建类似和标准误差修正模型,考察房价短期波动的决定因素,分析了房价波动自相关和均值回复表现差异的原因。在房价连锁反应实证研究中,构建了各城市和全国房价的协整和误差修正模型,通过不同城市对全国基本面因素变动的反应差异,各城市相对全国平均房价的偏离趋势,考察是否存在房价连锁现象。并通过几个热点城市的房价协整关系检验和Granger因果检验,考察这些城市间是否存在房价的空间交互作用。为了更好地解释宏观经济现象背后的原因,本文还对三个代表城市进行了住房市场心理及行为因素调研,于2007年10月在杭州、武汉和无锡三个城市各发放调研问卷400份,对有购房意愿者了解其价格预期,购房动机,对住房市场的看法,房价上涨的原因等,在此基础上分析了价格预期的形成过程。
     本文的主要研究结论如下:
     (1)我国35个大中城市的住房价格波动受基本面因素波动和短期波动调整过程共同影响。通过房价波动决定因素的多元回归模型和经过严格单根检验的标准误差修正模型两种方法,得到较为一致的结论。从长期看,我国城市住房价格水平由收入、人口、建设成本、人口密度等因素决定。房价的波动,除受这些基本面因素波动影响外,还有短期波动调整过程,包括房价变化的自相关和修正与基本面所决定的均衡房价偏离的均值回复。
     (2)不同城市的短期波动调整过程存在较大差异。沿海开放城市房价变化自相关现象显著,而内陆城市房价变化自相关不显著,有很强的均值回复倾向。本文通过构建反映基本面因素与短期波动调整交互作用的模型,分析了自相关和均值回复现象的可能原因。收入越高的城市,房价变化的自相关现象越明显;人口密度越大的城市房价变化自相关性越强。更高的收入增长,导致更大的均值回复;建设成本增加越多,房价变化的均值回复现象越小。
     (3)我国城市间房价存在弱的连锁反应。本文将35个大中城市按照地理位置划分为华东、华南、华北、东北、中部和西部六个区域。除华东地区外,其它各区域的城市房价与全国平均房价比值有较强的回复到长期均衡值的倾向,而在短期各地对于全国因素冲击确实有快慢不同的反应。全国收入水平提高时,华东地区房价产生最大的正反应;利率发生变化,也是华东地区房价产生更大的负效应;货币供应量变化时,华北地区房价有较大反应;建设成本变化时,中部、华南、东北和西部的反应都低于全国平均水平,西部的相对偏离最大。连锁反应呈多“震中”的弱型关联。
     (4)城市间房价确实存在空间交互作用。本文利用北京、上海、天津、广州、深圳、重庆等六个城市的中房住宅指数季度数据,构建向量误差修正模型,城市房价指数间的协整关系和Granger因果关系表明存在房价空间交互作用。但房价的空间扩散路径与是否邻接没有明显关联。从这六个城市来看,存在热点城市之间,以及从东部沿海城市到西部内陆城市的房价扩散。房价扩散的原因可能有资本流动、信息扩散、预期和地区结构差异,后两者是主要决定因素。
     (5)房价变化自相关性强的城市在空间上也处于领先波动地位。连锁反应中领先房价周期的华东、华北、华南地区正好都是房价变化自相关性强的沿海城市。这种一致性是因为两种现象的根本原因是相同的,好的经济基础和宜人性是这些地区领先增长的必备条件和长期增长预期的基础,而投资意识和后视预期是短期正自相关和领先增长的主要动力。对杭州、武汉、无锡三个代表城市住房市场微观心理和行为因素的调研表明,价格预期的形成过程反映了房价变化自相关现象的产生,也与连锁反应表现一致。
     (6)要充分认识城市间房价波动在时间和程度上的差异,讨论房价波动和制定调控政策不能忽视地区差异一概而论。沿海开放城市保持住房市场稳定发展关键就是要杜绝人为炒作,控制投机行为,注重正确的舆论导向,加大市场透明度。内陆城市住房市场要健康培育,既不能无端受牵连打击,也不能盲目看齐发达城市,忽视自身基本面。中央政策制定者应充分考虑其所处的周期发展阶段,处于市场起步阶段时不可与繁荣的沿海住房市场同等对待。地方政府则应该防止市场上升期的过度投机。资本流动和信息扩散在城市房价自相关和空间相关过程中都起重要作用,要防止价格出现激烈波动,应防止投机资金和热钱肆意流动,媒体报道注重风险预防。
     与已有研究相比,本文的主要学术创新价值有如下几点:
     (1)通过构建从房价变化自相关和空间相关两个维度考察住房价格波动的研究框架,对住房价格波动的产生机制进行了系统分析,对我国35个大中城市的住房价格波动差异和联系进行了实证研究。国内住房价格研究中有关注具体热点城市的房价波动特点,也有对住房价格影响因素的一般研究,但较少关注城市间波动差异,更缺乏同时关注住房价格波动差异和联系的系统研究。本文采用面板协整和误差修正模型,分析住房价格在自身基本面因素之外的短期调整波动,以及偏离全国房价变动的短期领先波动,发现两者之间确实存在关联性,领先波动的城市往往也是波动自相关性强的沿海城市。对房价波动的系统研究,有利于拓展住房价格异常波动以及住房价格泡沫研究的思路,丰富了我国现有住房价格波动研究,探索性的研究发现为后续相关研究提供了参考和借鉴。
     (2)采用宏观计量分析和微观心理调研相结合的研究方法。相对于一些研究直接将房价波动的自相关称为投机和泡沫因素,或对房价连锁反应做出一些主观解释,本文作了更细致的工作。首先在价格波动的误差修正模型中,考察了基本面因素与价格波动自相关和均值回复的交互作用,揭示了哪些城市因素影响了自相关和均值回复的强度。在房价连锁反应研究中,对我国住房市场可能的连锁原因进行了定性研究。然后通过对典型城市住房市场购房心理和行为调研,根据对三城市总共1132份有效问卷价格预期形成过程的分析,得出与宏观计量研究一致的结论,发现在我国现阶段预期是影响房价波动的重要原因。这种宏观计量分析基础上,辅以多城市的同期问卷调查对比研究,以及通过开放式问题了解购房者心态的调研方式在我国房地产研究中还鲜有先例。
     (3)通过结构系数异质和空间交互作用两个维度对我国住房市场的房价连锁反应进行了实证研究。我国近年由于很多城市房价轮番上涨,关于房价“联动”与“轮动”的说法很多,但缺乏规范的实证研究。本文通过构建反映城市房价与全国房价偏离的结构模型,考察基本面因素变动对于房价波动偏离的影响,由此判断是否存在“连锁”反应,另一方面,通过检验典型城市间房价的协整和Granger因果关系,考察房价空间上是否存在交互作用。两方面的证据表明我国住房市场存在弱的连锁反应,连锁的特点与国外的研究发现有所不同,呈多中心的连锁格局,价格的扩散与地理上的邻近没有直接关系,主要是热点城市之间,沿海城市到内陆城市之间的价格扩散。这种研究方法和得出的研究结论对我国学者进一步开展类似研究具有参考价值。
     受困于数据采集的限制,加上笔者时间和能力有限,本文尚存在一些不足之处,希望在今后的研究中能够得到完善和补充。可能的研究拓展是,随着房价数据序列的延长和面板数据方法的改进,采用更先进有效的检验方法研究面板数据的平稳性和协整关系。同时,房价变化自相关和空间相关之间的联系,以及它们背后的原因,还值得进一步的探索研究。
House price dynamics will influence not only the dwelling quality and living level, but also family wealth. It is related to national economy development and social harmonious. In recent ten years, with the reform of housing allotment system, Chinese housing market has gotten rapid development. At the same time, house price has run up sharply. Compared in the whole country, there are higher price levels and more rapid growth in some coastal cities to which people always pay more attention. The house price in inland cities is lower in the mass, but some have shown strong chasing tendency. Then, why the house price rise more rapidly in costal cities? What are the factors and reasons that cause the house dynamics? Weather or not the house dynamics is affected by psychological expectation? At present, some scholars have studied the factors of house price levels in Chinese cities and some have made empirical research about speculative characters of house price. But few focused on the difference of house price dynamics among cities. The empirical research in different countries and districts have inconsistent conclusion about ripple effect. Some reportage in China alleged that there were "linkage" and "by turns" among prices in different cities. But normative empirical research is absent. This paper tries to investigate the difference of house price dynamics among cities and examine the ripple effect in Chinese housing market.
     After studying abroad and home studies on housing price and price dynamics, this paper constructed an analytical frame to examine house price dynamics through autocorrelation and spatial correlation and explained the causing mechanism about it. Collecting data of house prices and city economy in Chinese 35 metropolitans since 1995, the paper made an empirical study about the difference and relevancy of house price dynamics in our country. In the research of dynamic difference, based on the factors analysis of house price level, constructing similar and normal error correction model, the paper studied the determinant of short-run dynamics, and analyzed the reason of difference in autocorrelation and mean reversion. In the research of ripple effect, the paper constructed national and local error correction model of house price. According to different reaction to national fundamentals, and the departure trend relative to national average house price, the paper investigated if there was ripple effect. With the cointegration and Granger test for several hotspot cities, the paper examined the interaction of house prices. In order to better explain the diversity of the macro- economic phenomenon, the author made a survey for psychology and behavior in three representative housing markets. In October2007, we put out 400 pieces of questionnaire respectively in Hangzhou, Wuhan and Wuxi, trying to know the price expectation, buying motivation, opinion about housing market and the reason of price appreciation, and to analyze the formation of price expectation.
     The paper research obtains main conclusions as follows:
     (1)The house price dynamics in Chinese 35 metropolitans is determined together by the dynamics of fundamentals and short-run adjustment dynamics. With the method of direct regress model and normal error correction model, the paper drew consistent conclusion. House price in Chinese cities is determined by income, population, construction cost and density in the long run. Besides the effect of fundamental dynamics, the house price dynamics is influenced by shot-run adjustment dynamics, including house price changes autocorrelation and the mean reversion to the fundamentals.
     (2)There is obvious intercity difference in shot-run adjustment dynamics. The autocorrelation of house price changes is notable in coastal cities but unapparent in inland cities. There is strong mean reversion tendency in inland. Considering the interaction of fundamentals and adjustment dynamics, the paper examined the possible reasons for autocorrelation and mean reversion. In cities with higher income and bigger density, the autocorrelation of house price dynamics is stronger. The more the income grows, the bigger is the mean reversion; the more the cost grows, the smaller is the mean reversion.
     (3)There is weak ripple effect in Chinese cities. The paper divided 35 metropolitans into six parts i.e. East, North, South, West, Northeast and the Center. The deviations of regional house price from the national average are stationary—the deviations show no long-run trends-- in five regions except the East. But the short-run coefficients surely exhibit distinct spatial patterns. House price are more responsive to income changes and rate changes in the East than the national average. The money supply has a more positive effect on house price in the North. House price in the Center, South, Northeast and west are less responsive to construction cost than average, and the least is in the West. The ripple effect shows weak linkage with centers more than one.
     (4)The spatial interactions exist among house price in different cities. The paper used seasonal residential index (China Real Estate Index System) for Beijing, Shanghai, Tianjin, Guangzhou, Shenzhen and Chongqing to construct vector error correction (VEC) model. The results of co integration and Granger test indicated the existence of spatial interaction. But the diffusion is not obviously related to contiguous. To judging with these six cities, the house price diffuses from the east coastal to the west inland and between hotspot cities. The possible reasons for diffusion include capital transfer, information transmits, expectation and differences in regional structure, and the last two are more important.
     (5)Cities with stronger autocorrelation in house price changes are also those with leading dynamics spatially. The regions with leading dynamics in ripple effect are East, North and South, most are coastal cities with strong autocorrelation in price changes. The consistency is because of their common ground. Good economic fundamentals and amenities are necessary condition for leading growth and bases for long-run expectation. And investment consciousness and backward expectation are main momentum for shot-run positive autocorrelation and leading dynamics. With the survey of micro psychology and behavior for three representative cities i.e. Hangzhou, Wuhan and Wuxi, the paper found that the formation for price expectation reflects the price changes autocorrelation and is consistent with ripple effect.
     (6)We should fully aware the intercity difference in house price dynamics about time and extent when enacting policies. The key for the coastal to development healthily is to prohibit speculation, to orient public opinion accurately, and to increase market transparence. For the inland, it is both important to not be embroiled in suppress and to not be hoped catching up with leading cities disregarding fund-mental. The policy maker in central government should consider the cyclical phases in different cities and can't treat underway inland market as same as boom coastal market. Local government should prevent overspectulation in the rising up. Both capital transfer and information transmission are important in autocorrelation and spatial correlation. To prevent drastic dynamics, we should prevent the smart money from flowing wantonly. The news should report the risk warning of housing market.
     Compared with previous research findings, the main innovation of this paper is manifested in the following aspects:
     (1) The paper comprehensively studied the causing mechanism of house price dynamics through constructing a research frame with two dimensions—autocorrelation and spatial correlation. Then, it made empirical research for the difference and linkage of house price dynamics in Chinese 35 metropolitans. Some house price research in China focused on dynamics in certain hotspot cities, and some research the general factors of house price. Few paid attention to intercity difference in price dynamics and even fewer studied difference and linkage of house price dynamics simultaneously. Using panel data cointegration and error correction model, this paper analyzed short-run adjustment dynamics beyond fundamentals and leading dynamics deviating from national average, and found that there were really nexus between the two. Leading dynamic cities are usually those coastal cities with strong autocorrelation. The comprehensive study for house price dynamics is useful to rich research of abnormal house price dynamics and house price bubbles, becoming an important complement to present research in our country. The tentative findings will provide reference and experience for future research.
     (2)This paper used a method of integrating macro econometric model and micro psychology survey in house price dynamics research. Comparing with some studies which directly called autocorrelation as speculation and bubble, and some made subjective explanation for ripple effect, the paper did more detailed. First, it added interaction items of fundamentals and autocorrelation in price dynamics error correction model, detecting the city factors which impact the strength of autocorrelation and mean reversion. In the study of ripple effect, the paper made qualitative analysis for possible reasons. Then, through the survey for house buying psychology and behavior in representative cities, the paper made an anatomy for the formation of price expectation with 1132 effective questionnaires, and drew consistent conclusions with macro econometric analysis. The paper found that expectation is important reason for house price dynamics at present in China. The method of macro econometric analysis accompanied with homochronous survey for several cities and the manner of open question for attitude are unwonted in housing research in China.
     (3)The paper made empirical research for ripple effect in Chinese housing market through coefficient heterogeneity and spatial interaction. Owing to the price rising in many cities in recent years, there are some sayings about "linkage"and "rise by turns" which haven't been approved by normal research. The paper examined price deviation from average for the shock of fundamentals through constructing structure model for city's and national house price and judge the existence of "ripple" with it. On the other hand, the paper did cointegration and Granger test for representative cities to examine spatial interaction. The two dimensions both indicate that there is weak ripple effect in Chinese housing market. The character is to some extent different from foreign countries. Ripple effect has more than one center and the diffusion exists mainly between hotspot cities and from the coastal to inland, not related to contiguity. The method and the conclusion have referenced value for future research.
     Restricted to time, ability and data collection, this paper has some shortcomings waiting for improvement in future. Possible development is to use more effective test method for stationarity and cointegration with the extension of time series and improvement of panel data methodology. In addition, the relationship of autocorrelation and spatial correlation and the reason behind them are worthy to be further explored.
引文
[1] Abraham, J. M. &Hendershott, P. H. Patterns and Determinants of Metro- politan House Prices, 1977-1991.[EB/OL]. NBER.Working paper http://www.nber.org, 1993.No.4196
    [2] Abraham, J. M. &Hendershott, P. H. Bubbles in Metropolitan Housing Markets, [J].Journal of Housing Research, 1996,7(2): 191-207
    [3] Alexander, C. &Barrow, M.Seasonality and Cointegration of Regional House Prices in the UK[J].Urban Studies, 1994,31(10):1667-1689.
    [4] Allen, F. &Gale, D.Bubbles and Crises[J]. The Economic Journal, 2000, 110(460): 236-255.
    [5] Andrew, M. &Meen, G. House Price Appreciation, Transactions and Structural Change in the British Housing Market: A Macroeconomic Perspective[J].Real Estate Economics, 2003a, 31(1): 99-116.
    [6] Andrew, M. &Meen, G. Housing Transactions and the Changing Decisions of Young Households in Britain: The Microeconomic Evidence[J]. Real Estate Economics, 2003b,31(1):l 17-138.
    [7] Arnott, R. J.&Lewis, F. D.The Transition of Land to Urban Use[J].The Journal of Political Economy, 1979,87(1): 161-169.
    [8] Arnott, R.A Simple Urban Growth Model with Durable Housing[J].Regional Science and Urban Economics,1980(10):53-76
    [9] Ashworth, J.&Parker, S. C.Modelling Regional House Prices in the UK[J]. Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 1997,44(3):225-246.
    [10] Aura, S. &Davidoff, T. Supply constraints and housing prices[J]. Economics Letters, 2008,99(2):275-277
    [11] Barras, R.Property and the economic cycle: Building cycles revisited[J].Journal of Property Research, 1994,11 (3): 183-197.
    [12]Berkovec, J. A. &Goodman Jr, J. L.Turnover as a Measure of Demand for Existing Homes[J]. Real Estate Economics, 1996,24(4):421-440.
    [13]Bjorklund, K. &Soderberg, B. Property Cycles, Speculative Bubbles and the Gross Income Multiplier[J]. Journal of Real Estate Research, 1999,18(1):151-174.
    [14]Blanchard, O. &Fischer, S. Lectures on Macroeconomics, MIT Press. 1989.
    [15]Blomquist, G. C., Berger, M. C. &Hoehn, J. P. New Estimates of Quality of Life in Urban Areas[J].The American Economic Review, 1988,78(1):89-107.
    [16]Bourassa, S. C. Further evidence on the existence of housing market bubbles[J]. Journal of Property Research,2001,18(1):1-19.
    [17]Bowen, A.Housing and the Macroeconomy in the United Kingdom[J].Housing Policy Debate, 1994(5):241-252.
    [18]Brown, G. T. Real Estate Cycles Alter the Valuation Perspective[J]. Appraisal Journal, 1984,52(4):539-49.
    [19] Cameron, G., Muellbauer, J. &Murphy, A. Was There A British House Price Bubble? Evidence from a Regional Panel[A]. Centre for Economic Policy Research London, Discussion Paper Series, 2006(5619)
    [20]Capozza, D. R., Hendershott, P. H., Mack, C, et al. (2002). Determinants of Real House Price Dynamics[EB/OL]. NBER. Working paper http://www.nber.org,2002
    [21] Capozza, D. R., Hendershott, P. H. &Mack, C. An Anatomy of Price Dynamics in Illiquid Markets: Analysis and Evidence from Local Housing Markets[J].Real Estate Economics, 2004,32(1): 1-32.
    
    [22] Capozza, D. R. &Seguin, P. J. Expectations, efficiency, and euphoria in the housing market[J].Regional Science and Urban Economics, 1996, 26(3-4): 369-386.
    [23] Capozza, D.R. &Helsley, R. W. The fundamentals of land prices and urban growth [J]. Journal of Urban Economics, 1989,26(3):295-306.
    [24] Case, B., Pollakowski, H. O.&Wachter, S. M. On Choosing Among House Price Index Methodologies[J]. Real Estate Economics, 1991,19(3):286-307.
    [25] Case, B.&Quigley, J. M. The Dynamics of Real Estate Prices[J]. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 1991,73(1):50-58.
    [26] Case, K. E.&Mayer, C. J.Housing Price Dynamics Within a Metropolitan Area[EB/OL]. NBER Working Paper, 1995,No.5182
    [27] Case, K. E., Quigley, J. M.&Shiller, R. J. Comparing wealth effects: the stock market versus the housing market, NBER. Working paper http://www.nber.org , 2001
    
    [28] Case, K. E. &Shiller, R. J. The Behavior of Home Buyers in Boom and Post-Boom Markets[EB/OL]. NBER Working Paper, 1989a,No.2748
    [29] Case, K. E. &Shiller, R. J. The Efficiency of the Market for Single-Family Homes, [J]. American Economic Review, 1989b,79(1):125-137.
    [30] Case, K. E. &Shiller, R. J. Forecasting Prices and Excess Returns in the Housing Market[J]. Real estate economics ,1990,18(3):253-273
    [31] Case, K. E. &Shiller, R. J. Is There a Bubble in the Housing Market? [J]. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 2003(2):299-363.
    [32]Cecchetti, S. G., Lam, P. S. &Mark, N. C. Mean Reversion in Equilibrium Asset Prices[J]. The American Economic Review, 1990,80(3):398-418.
    [33]Chambers, D. N.&Diamond Jr, D. B. Regulation and Land Prices[J]. American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association Midyear 1988
    [34] Chen, M. C. &Patel, K. House Price Dynamics and Granger Causality: An Analysis of Taipei New Dwelling Market[J]. International Real Estate Review, 1998,1(1):101-126.
    [35]Chinloy, Peter.Returns to holding housing[J].Journal of Housing Economics, 1992,2(4):310-323.
    [36]Clapp, J.M., Dolde, W. &Tirtiroglu, D. Imperfect Information and Investor Inferences from Housing Price Dynamics[J]. Real Estate Economics, 1995, 23(3): 239-269
    [37] Clayton, J. Rational Expectations, Market Fundamentals and Housing Price Volatility[J]. Real Estate Economics, 1996,24(4):441
    [38] Cook, S. The convergence of regional house prices in the UK[J]. Urban Studies, 2003,40(11):2285-2294.
    [39] Cook, S. Detecting long-run relationships in regional house prices in the UK[J]. International Review of Applied Economics, 2005a, 19(1): 107-118
    [40] Cook, S. Regional house price behaviour in the UK: application of a joint testing procedure[J]. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 2005b, 345(3-4):611-621.
    [41]Coulson, N. E. &Kim, M. S. Residential Investment, Non-residential Investment and GDP[J]. Real Estate Economics, 2000,28(2):233-247.
    [42]Croppert, M. L. The Value of Urban Amentities[J]. Journal of Urban Economics, 1981,21(3).
    [43]Cutler, D. M., Poterba, J. M.&Summers, L. H. Speculative Dynamics and the Role of Feedback Traders[J]. American Economic Review, 1990,80(2):63-68.
    [44] Cutler, D. M., Poterba, J. M.&Summers, L. H. Speculative Dynamics[J]. Review of Economic Studies, 1991,58(3):529-46.
    [45]Davidoff, T. Labor Income, Housing Prices and Homeownership[J].Journal of Urban Economics,2006,59(2): 209-235.
    [46]De Long, J. B., Shleifer, A., Summers, L. H.,et al. Positive Feedback Investment Strategies and Destabilizing Rational Speculation[J]. Journal of Finance, 1990, 45(2): 379-395.
    [47]Denise, D. P. &Wheaton William, C. Housing Market Dynamics and the Future of Housing Prices[J]. Journal of Urban Economics, 1994,35(1):1-27
    [48]DiPasquale, D. & Wheaton, W. C. The Markets for Real Estate Assets and Space: A Conceptual Framework[J]. Real Estate Economics, 1992,20(2): 181-198.
    [49]DiPasquale, D.&Wheaton, W. C. Urban economics and real estate markets, Prentice Hall Englewood Cliffs, NJ.,1996
    [50] Downs, A. The Advisory Commission on Regulatory Barriers to Affordable Housing: Its Behavior and Accomplishments[J]. Housing Policy Debate,1991, 2(4):1095-137.
    [51] Drake, L. Testing for Convergence between UK Regional House Prices[J]. Regional Studies: The Journal of the Regional Studies 1995, 29(4): 357-366.
    [52]Engelhardt, G. V. House Prices and the Decision to Save for Down Payments[J]. Journal of Urban Economics, 1994,36(2):209-237.
    
    [53]Engle, R. F. &Granger, C. W. J. Cointegration and Error Correction: Representation , Estimation and Testing[J]. Econometrica, 1987,55(2):251-276.
    [54]Englund, P. &Ioannides, Y. M. House Price Dynamics: An International Empirical Perspective[J]. Journal of Housing Economics, 1997,6(2):119-136.
    [55]Fama, E. F. Efficient Capital Markets-A Review of Theory and Empirical Work[J]. Journal of Finance,1970(2):383-423.
    [56]Fama, E. F. &French, K. R. Permanent and Temporary Components of Stock Prices[J]. The Journal of Political Economy, 1988,96(2):246-273.
    [57]Fischel, W. A. Do growth controls matter? Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, Cambridge, MA, 1990
    [58] Flood, R. P. &Garber, P. M. Market Fundamentals versus Price-Level Bubbles: The First Tests[J]. The Journal of Political Economy, 1980,88(4):745-770.
    [59] Flood, R. P. &Hodrick, R. J. On Testing for Speculative Bubbles[J]. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 1990,4(2):85-101.
    [60]Fortura, P. &Kushner, J. Canadian Inter-City House Price Differentials[J]. Real Estate Economics, 1986,14(4):525-536.
    [61]Fu, Y.&Ng, L. K. Market Efficiency and Return Statistics: Evidence from Real Estate and Stock Markets Using a Present-Value Approach[J]. Real Estate Economics, 2001,29(2):227-250.
    [62]Gallin, J. H. The Long-run Relationship Between House Prices and Income: Evidence from Local Housing Markets[J]. Real Estate Economics, 2003, 34(3):417-438
    [63]Garino, G. &Samo, L.Speculative Bubbles in UK House Prices: Some New Evidence[J]. Southern Economic Journal, 2004,70(4):777-796.
    [64]Giussani, B. &Hadjimatheou, GHouse prices: An econometric model for the UK[J]. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 1992,7(1):31-58.
    [65]Glaeser, E. L., Gyourko, J. &Saks, R. Why is Manhattan So Expensive? Regulation and the Rise in Housing Prices[J].Economics,2005(48):331-369.
    [66]Glaeser, E. L., Gyourko, J. &Saks, R. E.Urban growth and housing supply[J]. Journal of Economic Geography, 2006,6(1):71-89.
    [67]Glaeser, E. L. &Gyourko, J. E. Housing Dynamics[EB/OL] NBER Working Paper, http://www.nber.org, 2006,No. 12787
    [68] Goodman, A. C. An econometric model of housing price, permanent income, tenure choice, and housing demand[J]. Journal of Urban Economics, 1988,23(3): 327-353.
    [69] Granger, C. W. J. Developments in the Study of Cointegrated Economic Variables[J]. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 1986,48(3): 213-28.
    [70] Green, R. K. Follow the Leader: How Changes in Residential and Non-Residential Investment Predict Changes in GDP[J]. Real Estate Economics, 1997, 25(2): 253-270
    [71]Greulich, E., Quigley, J. M. &Raphael, S.The Anatomy of Rent Burdens[J]. Brookings Wharton papers on urban affairs, 2004:149-205.
    [72] Guntermann, K. L. &Norrbin, S. C. Empirical tests of real estate market efficiency [J]. The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 1991, 4(3):297-313.
    [73]Guntermann, K. L. &Smith, R. L.Efficiency of the Market for Residential Real Estate[J]. Land Economics, 1987,63(1):34-45.
    [74]Gyourko, J., Mayer, C. J. &Sinai, T. M. Superstar Cities[EB/OL] NBER Working Paper, http://www.nber.org, 2006,No. 12355
    [75] Hamilton, B. W.&Schwab, R. Expected Appreciation in Urban Housing Markets [J]. Journal of Urban Economics, 1985,18(1):103-18.
    [76] Hamilton, J. D. Time Series Analysis, Princeton University Press. 1994.
    [77]Hamilton, J. D.&CharlesH. W.TheObservableImplications of Self- Fulfilling Prophecies[J].Journal of Monetary Economics, 1985(16): 353-373.
    [78] Harris, J. C.The effect of real rates of interest on housing prices[J]. The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 1989,2(1):47-60.
    [79] Harris, R. D. F. &Tzavalis, E. Inference for unit roots in dynamic panels where the time dimension is fixed[J]. Journal of Econometrics, 1999,91(2):201-226.
    [80] Harrison, J. M. &Kreps, D. M.Speculative Investor Behavior in a Stock Market with Heterogeneous Expectations[J]. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1978, 92(2):323-336.
    [81]Hendershott, P. H. &Thibodeau, T. G.The Relationship between Median and Constant Quality House Prices: Implications for Setting FHA Loan Limits[J]. Real Estate Economics, 1990,18(3):323-334.
    [82] Ho, W. K. O. Modelling speculative activity in the Hongkong residential property market[J]. Review of Urban and Development Studies, 2000,12(2):
    [83]Hort, K. The Determinants of Urban House Price Fluctuations in Sweden 1968-1994[J]. Journal of Housing Economics, 1998,7(2):93-120.
    [84] Hsiao, C. Analysis of Panel Data[M]. Beijing, Peking University Press,2005
    [85]Hui, E. &Lui, T. Y. Rational expectations and market fundamentals[J]. Journal of Property Investment & Finance, 2002,20(1):
    [86]Hui, E.&Yue, S. Housing Price Bubbles in Hong Kong, Beijing and Shanghai: A Comparative Srudy[J]. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 2006,33(4):
    [87]Hwang, M. &Quigley, J. M. Economic Fundamentals in Local Housing Markets: Evidence From US Metropolitan Regions[J]. Journal of Regional Science,2006a, 46(3):425-453.
    [88]Hwang, M., Quigley, J. M. &Son, J. The Dividend Pricing Model: New Evidence from the Korean Housing Market[J]. The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 2006b,32(3):205-228.
    [89]Ito, T. The Land/Housing Problem in Japan: A Macroeconomic Approach[J]. Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, 1993,7(1):1-31.
    [90]Ito, T. &Hirono, K. N. Efficiency of the Tokyo Housing Market, [EB/OL] NBER Working Paper, http://www.nber.org, 1994
    [91]Ito, T. &Iwaisako, T. Explaining Asset Bubbles in Japan, [EB/OL] NBER Working Paper, http://www.nber.org, 1995.
    [92] Jud, G D. &Winkler, D. T. The Dynamics of Metropolitan Housing Prices [J]. Journal of Real Estate Research, 2002,23(1/2):29-46.
    [93]Kadar, A. What Explains Runaway Housing Prices?[EB/OL]. http://emlab. berkeley. edu/ econ/ugrad/theses/andrew_kadar2006
    [94] Kahn, M. E. City Quality-of-Life Dynamics: Measuring the Costs of Growth[J]. The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 2001,22(2): 339-352.
    [95] Kaiser, R. W. The Long Cycle in Real Estate[J]. Journal of Real Estate Research, 1997,14(3):233-257.
    [96] Krainer, J. House Price Bubbles[EB/OL]. Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco Economic Letters, http://www.frbsf.org/publications/economics/letter/ 2003/el 2003-06.html
    [97] Lamont, O. &Stein, J. C. Leverage and house-price dynamics in US cities[J]. RAND Journal of Economics, 1999,30(3):498-514.
    [98] Leung, C. Macroeconomics and housing: a review of the literature[J]. Journal of Housing Economics, 2004,13(4):249-267.
    [99] Levin, A., Lin, C. F. &James Chu, C. S. Unit root tests in panel data: asymptotic and finite-sample properties[J]. Journal of Econometrics, 2002,108(1): 1-24.
    [100]Levin, E. J. &Wright, R. E. Speculation in the Housing Market?[J].Urban Studies, 1997, 34(9): 1419-1438.
    [101]Linneman, P. An Empirical Test of the Efficiency of the Housing Market[J]. Journal of Urban Economics, 1986,20(2): 140-154.
    [102]Linneman, P. The State of Local Growth Management, Real Estate Center, Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania. working paper, 1990
    [103] Long, J. B. D., Shleifer, A., Summers, L. H.,et al. Noise Trader Risk in Financial Markets[J]. The Journal of Political Economy, 1990,98(4):703-738.
    [104] Luciano, G. On the Power of Panel Cointegration Tests: A Monte Carlo Comparison [J]. Economics Letters ,2003,80(1): 105-111.
    [105]Luo, Z. Q., Chunlu, L. I. U. &Picken, D.Housing Price Diffusion Pattern of Australia's State Capital Cities[J]. International Journal of Strategic Property Management, 2007(11):227-242.
    [106]MacDonald, R.&Taylor, M.Regional house prices in Britain: long-run relationships and short-run dynamics[J]. Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 1993,40(1):43-55.
    [107]Maddala, G. S. &Wu, S. A Comparative Study of Unit Root Tests with Panel Data and a New Simple Test: Evidence From Simulations and the Bootstrap[J]. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 1999,61(1):631-652.
    [108]Malpezzi, S. Housing Prices, Externalities, and Regulation in US Metropolitan Areas[J] Journal of Housing Research, 1996,7(2) :209-241
    [109]Malpezzi, S.A Simple Error Correction Model of House Prices[J]. Journal of Housing Economics, 1999,8(1):27-62.
    [110]Malpezzi, S., Chun, G. H.&Green, R. K.New Place-to-Place Housing Price Indexes for U. S. Metropolitan Areas, and Their Determinants[J]. Real Estate Economics, 1998,26(2):235-274.
    [111]Malpezzi, S. &Wachter, S. The Role of Speculation in Real Estate Cycles[J]. Journal of Real Estate Literature, 2005,13(2):143-166.
    [112]Mankiw, N. G. &Weil, D. N. The Baby Boom, The Baby Bust, and the Housing Market[J]. Regional science and urban economics, 1989,12(1):235-258
    [113]Manning, C. A.Explaining intercity home price differences[J]. The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 1989,2(2): 131-149.
    [114] Mayer, C. J.&Somerville, C.T. Residential Construction:Using theUrban Growth Model to Estimate Housing Supply[J]. Journal of Urban Economics, 2000, 48(1): 85-109.
    [115]Mayer, C. J. &Somerville, C. T.Land use regulation and new construction [J]. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 2000a,30(6):639-662.
    [116]Meen, G. Spatial aggregation, spatial dependence and predictability in the UK housing market[J]. Housing Studies,1996,11(3):345-372.
    [117]Meen, G. Regional House Prices and the Ripple Effect: A New Interpretation [J]. Housing Studies, 1999,14(6):733-753.
    
    [118]Meen, G. Housing Cycles and Efficiency[J]. Scottish journal of political economy, 2000,47(2): 114-140
    [119]Meen, G. P. Modelling Spatial Housing Markets: Theory, Analysis and Policy [M]. Kluwer Academic Pub.2002 a
    [120]Meen, G The Time-Series Behavior of House Prices: A Transatlantic Divide?[J]. Journal of Housing Economics, 2002b,11(1):1-23.
    [121]Meese, R. &Wallace, N. Testing the Present Value Relation for Housing Prices: Should I Leave My House in San Francisco?[J].Journal of Urban Economics, 1994,35(3):245-266.
    [122]Meese, R. &Wallace, N.House Price Dynamics and Market Fundamentals: The Parisian Housing Market [J]. Urban Studies,2003,40(5): 1027-1045.
    [123]Miller, N. &Peng, L.Exploring Metropolitan Housing Price Volatility[J].The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 2006,33(1):5-18.
    [124]Muellbauer, J. &Murphy, A. Explaining regional house prices in the UK.[EB/OL] http://www.jrf. org.uk/knowledge/findings/housing/H130.asp, 1994
    [125]Muellbauer, J. &Murphy, A. Booms and Busts in the UK Housing Market[J]. The Economic Journal, 1997,107(445): 1701-1727.
    [126]Munro, M. &Tu, Y. The Dynamics of UK National and Regional House Prices[J]. Review of Urban Regional Development Studies 1996,Vol. 8 (2): 186-201
    [127]Muth, R. F. The Demand for Non-farm Housing,[M]. Chicago:University of Chicago, 1958
    [128]Oikarinen, E. &Asposalo, E. Housing Portfolio Diversification Potentials in the Helsinki Metropolitan Area in the Short and Long Horizon[EB/OL] Turku School of Economics and Business Administration, 2004
    [129]Ortalo-Magne, F. &Rady, S. Boom in, bust out: Young households and the housing price cycle, Elsevier Science. European economic review , 1999,43(4): 755-766.
    [130]Ortalo-Magne, F. &Rady, S.Housing Market Dynamics: On the Contribution of Income Shocks and Credit Constraints[J]. Review of Economic Studies, 2006, 73(2):459-485.
    [131]Ozanne, L.&Thibodeau, T. Explaining Metropolitan Housing Price Differences [J]. Journal of Urban Economics, 1983,13(1):51-66.
    [132]Pedroni, P. Critical Values for Cointegration Tests in Heterogeneous Panels with Multiple Regressors[J]. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 1999,61(s1):653-670.
    [133]Pesaran, M. H.&Smith, R.Estimating long-run relationships from dynamic heterogeneous panels[J]. Journal of Econometrics, 1995,68(1):79-113.
    [134]Pollakowski, H. O. &Ray, T. S. Housing Price Diffusion Patterns at Different Aggregation Levels: An Examination of Housing Market Efficiency[J]. Journal of Housing Research, 1997,8(1): 107-124.
    [135]Pollakowski, H. O. &Wachter, S. M. The Effects of Land-Use Constraints on Housing Prices[J]. Land Economics, 1990,66(3):315-324.
    [136]Potepan, M. J. Explaining Intermetropolitan Variation in Housing Prices, Rents and Land Prices[J]. Real Estate Economics, 1996,24(2):
    [137]Poterba, J. M. Tax Subsidies to Owner-Occupied Housing: An Asset-Market Approach[J]. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1984,99(4):729-752.
    [138]Poterba, J. M., Weil, D. N. &Shiller, R. House Price Dynamics: The Role of Tax Policy and Demography [J]. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1991 (2): 143-203.
    [139]Poterba, J. &Summers, L.Mean Reversion in Stock Returns: Evidence and Implications[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 1988,22(1):27—59.
    [140]Pyhrr, S. A., Roulac, S. E.&Born, W. L. Real Estate Cycles and Their Strategic Implications for Investors and Portfolio Managers in the Global Economy[J]. Journal of Real Estate Research, 1999,18(1):7-68.
    [141]Quigley, J. M. Real estate prices and economic cycles[J]. International Real Estate Review, 1999,2(1): 1-20.
    [142]Quigley, J. M. &Raphael, S. Regulation and the High Cost of Housing in California[J]. American Economic Review, 2005(95):323-28.
    [143]Quigley, J. M. &Rosenthal, L. A. The Effects of Land-Use Regulation on the Price of Housing: What Do We Know? What Can We Learn?[J]. Cityscape,2005, 8(1): 69-138.
    [144]Quigley, J. &Raphael, S. Is Housing Unaffordable? Why Isn't It More Affordable[J]. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2004, 18(1): 191-214.
    [145]Reichert, A. K. The impact of interest rates, income, and employment upon regional housing prices, The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 1990 3(4): 373-391.
    
    [146]Reid. Housing and Income[M]. Chicago :University of Chicago Press,1962
    [147] Riddel, M. Fundamentals, Feedback Trading, and Housing Market Speculation: Evidence from California[J]. Journal of Housing Economics, 1999, 8(4):272-284.
    [148]Roback, J. Wages, Rents, and the Quality of Life[J]. The Journal of Political Economy, 1982,90(6):1257-1278.
    [149] Rose, L. A. Topographical Constraints and Urban Land Supply Indexes[J]. Journal of Urban Economics, 1989,26(3):335-347.
    [150] Rose, L. A. Urban Land Supply: Natural and Contrived Restrictions[J]. Journal of Urban Economics, 1989,25(3):325-45.
    [151]Rosenthal, S. S. Residential Buildings and the Cost of Construction: New Evidence on the Efficiency of the Housing Market[J]. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 1999,81(2):288-302.
    [152]Scheinkman, J. A. &Xiong, W. Overconfidence and Speculative Bubbles[J]. Journal of Political Economy, 2003,111 (6): 1183-1220.
    [153]Schill, M. H. Regulations and Housing Development: What We Know[J]. Cityscape: A Journal of Policy and Development Research, 2005(8)5-19.
    [154] Segal, D. &Srinivasan, P. The Impact of Suburban Growth Restrictions on US Housing Price Inflation, 1975-78[J]. Urban Geography, 1985,6(1):14-26.
    [155]Seko, M. Housing prices and economic cycles: Evidence from Japanese prefectures[A]. Nexus between the macro Economy and Housing Market[C] , HongKong, China, 2003.
    [156]Shiller, R. J. Do Stock Prices Move Too Much to be Justified by Subsequent Changes in Dividends?[J]. American Economic Review, 1981,71(3):421
    [157]Shiller, R. J. Bubbles, Human Judgment, and Expert Opinion[J]. Financial Analysts Journal, 2002,58(3): 18-26
    [158] Shilling, J. D., Sirmans, C. F. &Guidry, K. A. The Impact of State Land-Use Controls on Residential Land Values[J]. Journal of Regional Science,1991, 31 (1): 83-92.
    [159] Simpson, H. D. Real Estate Speculation and the Depression[J]. The American Economic Review, 1933,23(1):163-171.
    [160]Somerville, C. T. &Mayer, C. J. Government Regulation and Changes in the Affordable Housing Stock[J]. Fed. Reserve Bank New York Econ. Pol. Rev, 2003,9(2):45-62.
    [161]Stein,J.S.Prices and Trading Volume:A Model with Downpayment Constraints [J].Quarterly Journal of Economics,1995(110)379-406.
    [162]Stevenson,S.House price diffusion and inter-regional and cross-border house price dynamics[J].Journal of Property Research,2004,21(4):301-320.
    [163]Stiglitz,J.E.Symposium on Bubbles[J].The Journal of Economic Perspectives,1990,4(2):13-18.
    [164]Sutton,G.D.Explaining changes in house prices[J].BIS Quarterly Review,2002(9):46-55.
    [165]Tirtiroglu,D.&Clapp,J.M.Spatial barriers and information processing in Housing Markets:an empirical investigation of the Connecticut river on housing returns[J].Journal of Regional Science,1996,36(3):365-392.
    [166]Tsatsaronis,K.&Zhu,H.What Drives Housing Price Dynamics:Cross-Country Evidence[J].Quarterly review Tsatsaronis,2004(3):65-78.
    [167]Tu,Y.Segmentation of Australian housing markets:1989-98[J].Journal of Property Research,2000,17(4):311-327.
    [168]Wallace,N.E.&Meese,R.A.The Construction of Residential Housing Price Indices:A Comparison of Repeat-Sales,Hedonic-Regression and Hybrid Approaches [J].The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics,1997,14(1):51-73.
    [169]Wang,J.A model of intertemporal asset prices under asymmetric information[J].Review of Economic Studies,1993,60(2):249-282.
    [170]Wheaton,W.C.The Cyclical Behaviour ofthe National Office Market[J].American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association 1987,1(5):28.
    [171]Wheaton,W.C.Vacancy,Search,and Prices in a Housing Market Matching Model[J].The Journal of Political Economy,1990,98(6):1270-1292.
    [172]Wong,G.The Anatomy of a Housing Bubble[EB/OL].http://real.wharton.upenn.edu/Wongg/research/bubble_July.PDF,2005
    [173]Wong,K.Y.Housing Market Bubbles and the Currency Crisis:The Case of Thailand[J].The Japanese Economic Review,2001,52(4):382-404.
    [174]蔡洁.我国货币政策房地产价格传导机制分析[J].华北水利水电学院学报,2007,23(2):87-89
    [175]蔡穗声,王幼松.中国房地产市场地区差异分析--长江三角洲与珠江三角洲比较分析[J].中国房地产,2004(5)
    [176]陈海燕,张世英.我国经济增长与居民消费的面板协整检验[J].统计与决策,2006(9):67-70
    [177]崔光灿.房地产价格与泡沫[J].北方经济,2005(2):52-53
    [178]丹尼斯·迪帕斯奎尔,威廉·C·惠顿.城市经济与房地产市场[M].北京:经济科学出版社,2002:2-20
    [179]董玉华,宋元梁.东南部沿海向西部地区产业转移的经济分析[J].科技咨询 导报,2007(7):150-150
    [180]冯家臻.住房制度改革的必要性及其模式选择[J].经济改革,1991(5):49-50
    [181]冯俊.我国房地产业发展的现状与趋势[J].房地信息,1991(21):44-51
    [182]冯宗容.房改攻坚:住房保障制度的构建[J].四川大学学报,2001(3):47-52
    [183]傅汉强.调控风暴之后,武汉市的房价还会涨吗?[J].企业导报,2004(6):14-18
    [184]高铁梅.计量经济分析方法与建模[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2006:303-320
    [185]葛杨.经济宏观调控下房地产业的运行与走势[J].南京社会科学,2005(5):32-37
    [186]耿春普.我国房地产开发与经营中存在的问题[J].中国投资与建设,1996(1):24-24
    [187]古扎拉蒂·D·N.计量经济学基础[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2005
    [188]顾云昌.房地产市场的地区差异性分析[J].城市开发,2004(6)
    [189]关大宇.各地区农民收入差异与城镇化发展水平的相互关系--基于协整的Panel Data模型分析[J].统计与决策,2007(1):61-64
    [190]桂昭君,杨旭.房地产市场的“杭州现象”[J].中外房地产导报,2002(8):15-16
    [191]韩青,邢越.对海南省房地产业复苏的思考[J].海南金融,2003(12):24-27
    [192]何国钊,曹振良.中国房地产周期研究[J].经济研究,1996(12):51-56
    [193]何一峰,付海京.影响我国人口迁移因素的实证分析[J].浙江社会科学,2007(2),:47-51
    [194]贺晓东.中国房地产业区域现状分析与预测[J].经济学动态,1995(5):38-42
    [195]洪涛,高波和毛中根.外生冲击与房地产真实价格波动-对1998-2003年中国31省(市,区)的实证研究[J].财经研究,2005(11):88-97
    [196]洪涛,西宝和高波.房地产价格的区域间联动与泡沫的空间扩散--基于2000-2005年35个大中城市面板数据的实证检验[J].统计研究,2007,24(8):64-67
    [197]胡萍,卢姗.长三角地区人口迁移特征及其空间差异[J].西北人口,2007,28(3):101-104
    [198]华伟,张捷,诸慧.外资、汇率与房地产业发展的关系小议[J].上海改革,1998(2):35-36
    [199]华伟.中国房地产业的回顾与展望[J].探索与争鸣,2004(2):31-32
    [200]黄旭平,熊季霞.混业经营条件下银行集中与效率--基于面板单位根与面 板协整分析[J].当代经济与科学,2005,27(6):40-48
    [201]黄旭平.混业经营下金融发展与经济增长--基于亚洲地区的非稳定面板数据分析[J].金融与投资,2007,23(1):66-70
    [202]贾生华,聂冲.杭州房地产市场步入调整周期[J].浙江房地产,2006(2):42-43
    [203]姜春海.中国房地产市场投机泡沫实证分析[J].管理世界,2005(12):71-84
    [204]孔煜,魏峰和任宏.城市住宅价格的宏观经济影响因素[J].统计与决策,2006(19):84-85
    [205]李晖.武汉市房地产市场现状和发展态势分析[J].中外房地产导报,2003(10):36-37
    [206]李运章.我国房地产业的现状和若干发展战略[J].计划与发展,1991(4):47-50
    [207]梁云芳,高铁梅.中国房地产价格波动区域差异的实证分析[J].经济研究,2007(8):133-142
    [208]刘琳.房地产价格上涨特征及原因综述[J].城市开发,2005(5):64-67
    [209]刘玉峰,张亮和刘丹.我国房地产经济泡沫的形成机理与区域性特征[J].重庆建筑大学学报,2004,26(4):96-101
    [210]刘渝琳.外资企业对外贸易与经济增长关系的区域差异分析--基于我国东部和西部地区面板数据的检验[J].国际贸易问题,2007(3):59-66
    [211]刘志峰.保持房地产业健康发展推动住宅产业现代化[J].蜀中房地产,2004(8):6-8
    [212]罗伯特·J·希勒.非理性繁荣[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2001
    [213]吕福新.房改为房地产业奠基,支架和造势[J].中国物价,1994(4):11-14
    [214]吕福新.市场配置与社会保障相结合--住房制度改革目标的再认识[J].财贸经济,1993(9):48-51
    [215]马建堂.中国城镇住房制度改革的进程与重点[J].生产力研究,1995(4):22-27
    [216]孟晓苏,萧灼基.中国经济改革与房地产业的发展[J].市场与人口分析,1997(7):48-53
    [217]彭建文,张金鹗.总体经济对房地产景气影响之研究[J].国家科学委员会研究专刊:人文及社会科学,1999,10(3):330-343
    [218]彭建文,张金鹗.房地产景气与总体经济、金融市场之间的关系[A],中华民国住宅学会第七届年会论文集,1998:43-64
    [219]冉光和,李敬和熊德平等.中国金融发展与经济增长关系的区域差异--基于东部和西部面板数据的检验和分析[J].中国软科学,2006(2):102-110
    [220]沈悦,刘洪玉.住宅价格与经济基本面:1995-2002年中国14城市的实证 研究[J].经济研究2004(6):78-86
    [221]史永东,投机泡沫与投资者行为[M].北京商务印书馆,2005年
    [222]苏良军,何一封和金赛男.暂时收入影响消费吗?--来自中国农村居民面板数据的证据[J].管理世界,2005(7):26-30
    [223]苏良军,何一封和金赛男.中国城乡居民消费与收入关系的面板数据协整研究[J].世界经济,2006(5):65-72
    [224]孙冰,刘洪玉.不同收入家庭住房抵押贷款LTV选择研究[J].上海金融,2003(10):9-12
    [225]孙海刚.市场化进程中的中国地区[J].财经研究,2007,33(9):101-111
    [226]孙洪先,喻永心.房地产业发展趋势及建设银行的经营对策[J].投资研究,1997(5):23-28
    [227]孙柯.温州购房团大举西征[J].新西部,2004(4):26-26
    [228]谭刚.房地产周期冲击--传导模型及其主要因素分析[J].建筑经济,2002(7):16-20
    [229]汪利娜.房地产泡沫的生成机理与防范措施[J].财经科学,2003(1):92-97
    [230]汪涛,饶海斌.PanelData单位根和协整分析[J].统计研究,2002(5):53-57
    [231]王春艳,吴老二.人口迁移、城市圈与房地产价格--基于空间计量学的研究[J].人口与经济,2007(4):63-67
    [232]王贵鹏.基于非平稳面板数据的生产函数估计[J].生产力研究,2007(4):23-24
    [233]王桂新,董春.中国长三角地区人口迁移空间模式研究[J].人口与经济,2006(3):55-60
    [234]王桂新,黄颖钰.中国省际人口迁移与东部地带的经济发展:1995-2000[J].人口研究,2005,29(1):19-28
    [235]王桂新,毛新雅,张伊娜.中国东部地区三大都市圈人口迁移与经济增长极化研究[J].华东师范大学学报:哲学社会科学版,2006,38(5):1-9
    [236]王华玲,王涛.区域经济差距的因素分析[J].集团经济研究,2007(7):195-196
    [237]王克强,郑颖.房地产市场有效性研究综述[J].中国土地科学,2006,20(5):54-59
    [238]王来福,郭峰.货币政策对房地产价格的动态影响研究--基于VAR模型的实证[J].财经问题研究,2007(11):15-19
    [239]王瑞生.中国房地产业的现状和90年代的目标与任务[J].房地信息,1992(21):2-5
    [240]王少平.宏观计量的若干前沿理论与应用,天津:南开大学出版社:31-32
    [241]王维安,贺聪.房地产价格与货币供应:经验事实和理论假说[J].财经研究,2005,31(5):17-28
    [242]王小广.房地产业不能再非理性繁荣[J].瞭望新闻周刊,2004(5):60-60
    [243]王子明.泡沫与泡沫经济非均衡分析[M].北京大学出版社,2002:1-7
    [244]魏锋,曹中.我国服务业发展与经济增长的因果关系研究--基于东、中、西部面板数据的实证研究[J].统计研究,2007,24(2):44-46
    [245]温海珍,贾生华.理性评判杭州房地产市场[J].浙江经济,2004(13):11-13
    [246]吴鹤立.不堪回首忆狂潮[J].金融经济,2003(11):7-9
    [247]吴群,高慧琼.供求关系对大都市商品住宅价格作用机理的分析--以南京市为例[J].中国土地科学,2006,20(4):51-56
    [248]伍德里奇.计量经济学导论现代观点[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2003:427-439
    [249]武振.关于境外“热钱”投机北京房地产市场的思考[J].建筑经济,2007(4):57-59
    [250]谢东旭.“温州人”炒房在福建的影响[J].中国房地产金融,2004(4):48-48
    [251]谢经荣,朱勇和曲波等,地产泡沫和金融危机--国际经验及其借鉴[M].经济管理出版社,2002
    [252]杨继瑞,曹洪,卓武扬.2004年我国房地产业走势与对策分析,投资研究,2004(5):24-27
    [253]杨剑波.外国直接投资与我国技术创新研究[J].国际商务--对外经济贸易大学学报,2007(2):79-83
    [254]杨子晖.政府消费与私人消费的期内替代和跨期替代--来自亚洲国家的面板协整分析[J].统计研究,2006(8):27-32
    [255]尹中立.地产泡沫可能令中部崛起成泡影[J].财经,2005(23):20-20
    [256]尹中立.应该反思我国的住房制度改革[J].住宅与房地产:综合版,2005(11):30-31
    [257]余呈先.FDI与中国技术创新--基于面板协整和动态OLS模型的一个检验[J].武汉职业技术学院学报,2007,6(1):29-33
    [258]俞路,张善余.基于空间统计的人口迁移流分析-以我国三大都市圈为例[J].华东师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2005(5):25-31
    [259]虞晓芬,陈多长.论政府调控杭州房地产市场的理论依据与现实必要性[J].中国房地产,2004(7):14-17
    [260]袁本芳.2006年武汉楼市随新政平稳运行[J].中国房地信息,2006(12):12-17
    [261]袁志刚,范剑勇.城市竞争力和地产价格--上海市住宅建筑发展分析[J].学术月刊,2003(6):30-39
    [262]袁志刚,樊潇彦.房地产市场理性泡沫分析[J].经济研究,2003(3):34-43
    [263]曾艳云.俯瞰:武汉房地产市场[J].企业导报,2003年(10):4-7
    [264]张红,李文诞.北京商品住宅价格变动实证分析[J].中国房地产金融,2001(3):3-7
    [265]张红,翁少群.基于均衡价格形成机制的住宅价格变化特征研究[J].土木工程学报,2007(8):100-105
    [266]张泓铭.去除羁绊,积极引进--关于外资在上海房地产开发中的作用和问题[J].上海经济,2000(1):22-23
    [267]张晓峒.Eviews使用指南与案例[M].北京:机械工业出版社,2007
    [268]张晓军,吴明琴.巴拉萨--萨缪尔森假说的实证检验--来自亚洲的证据[J].南开经济研究,2005(5):72-79
    [269]张元端.中国房地产业的改革和发展[J].中外房地产导报,1992(5):4-6
    [270]张跃庆.在宏观经济调控中加速房地产市场经济体制的建设[J].北京经济瞭望,1995(1):12-18
    [271]赵路兴.详解温州购房团现象[J].城市开发,2004(5):16-21
    [272]赵培华.深圳利用外资的实证分析[J].特区经济,2004(11):22-23
    [273]郑思齐,刘洪玉.房地产市场有效性研究--以北京和上海为例[J].商业研究,2006(7):191-195
    [274]中国房地产发展报告课题组.2004-2005年房地产业形势分析与预测[J].冶金管理,2005(4):16-20
    [275]周京奎.房地产价格波动与投机行为-对中国14城市的实证研究[J].当代经济科学,2005(4):19-24