知识产权滥用的反垄断规制研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
在二十一世纪,智力成果已经成为影响一国综合国力的重要因素,作为智力成果保护的知识产权制度也日益为各国所关注。知识产权制度通过赋予所有者以独占性的权利,从而激励智力成果的开发与利用。但是,权利人往往为牟取利润而滥用知识产权,造成了对市场竞争秩序的破坏。本文研究的课题即在于探讨如何在维持知识产权权利人优势的前提下有效的维护市场竞争。本文运用经济分析、比较分析等方法,在对知识产权制度、知识产权滥用、知识产权法律限制体系及其与反垄断法律制度的关系等问题进行深入探讨的基础上,较为详细的考察了世界各国及国际知识产权反垄断立法、执法与司法的实践及其发展,最终提出了在我国应尽快建立知识产权反垄断法律规制体系的建议,并就该体系的构建提出了作者的初步设想。
     本文第一部分就知识产权保护与知识产权滥用问题进行了初步的探讨,运用成本收益分析的方法研究了知识产权保护与竞争的关系,指出了过度的知识产权保护对市场竞争秩序以及社会整体福利的损害,进而对知识产权滥用及其与知识产权正当行使的界限问题进行了探讨,最终得出了必须构建知识产权的法律限制体系这一结论。继而在对知识产权法律限制体系的研究中,笔者首先对知识产权法的传统法律限制体系进行了考察,指出了该体系在新的经济和科技发展形势下的破坏,提出了从私法到公法领域对于该体系的重建,并特别指出了反垄断法在该限制体系中的特殊地位和作用。
     本文第二部分探讨了知识产权法与反垄断法的关系,指出了二者在立法目的、价值目标上的一致以及在调整角度、目标重心以及具体制度上的冲突,并最终指出了知识产权法与反垄断法的关系最终以反垄断法在一定范围内的退让(适用除外制度),保证知识产权法适度的制度生存空间而终结。
     本文第三部分介绍了美国、欧盟、日本以及世界贸易组织在有关知识产权滥用反垄断规制方面的实践及其发展,并运用比较分析的方法对其在相关制度方面的共同点与差别进行了分析和评价,并指出了其对我国相关立法的借鉴意义。
     本文第四部分是全篇的重点和研究的目的所在,在这一部分文章首先指出了我国知识产权反垄断立法的必要性和紧迫性,并对我国现行相关法律规范进行了
    
    梳理,指出了我国相关规范现状背后所蕴涵的深层的历史和制度原因,随即从基
    本原则、运行机制、规范体系及其具体形式、反垄断控制方式、规制对象等诸多
    方面提出了关于构建我国知识产权滥用反垄断法律体系的初步设想。
Intellectual wealth has became the outstanding element which can affect comprehensive national power in the 21st century. As the protect of intellectual wealth, the whole world pay more and more attention on intellectual property. It endow the owners with exclusive rights to stimulate the exploitation and utilization. However the owners often abuse their rights to make profit, which destroyed the market competition. The topic of this thesis is how to protect competition effectively on basis of the maintenance of the owner's advantage. With the methods of economic analysis and comparison, we made a deep research on intellectual property, abuse of intellectual property, the restriction legal system of intellectual property, the relation between intellectual property and antimonopoly law. We introduced the practice of antimonopoly in the realm of intellectual property in many countries, advised to build the regulation system of antimonopoly in the realm of intellectual property in our country immediately, and p
    ut forward the preliminary design of that system.
    The first chapter discussed the protect and the abuse of intellectual property, use the method of cost and revenue analysis to research the relation between protect of intellectual property and competition. We indicated that the ultra protect of intellectual property will destroy the competition and result in a deadweight welfare loss. Then we discussed the traditional restriction system of intellectual property law, concluded that we must rebuild the restriction system by private law and public law, and indicated the special position and role of antimonopoly law in the restriction system of intellectual property.
    The second chapter discussed the relationship between intellectual property law and antimonopoly law. We have pointed out that their accordance on the aims and the spirit, and their conflict on angles, priority, regulations and detailed measures. In the end, we concluded that the relationship between them ended in the concession in some degree by antimonopoly law to ensure the moderate space for existence of intellectual property.
    The third chapter introduced the practice and progress of antimonopoly in the realm of intellectual property in USA, EC, Japan and WTO, and made an analysis and appraisal on the sameness and difference by comparison. In this part we also pointed the reference significance to our country.
    The forth chapter is the focus and the purpose in this thesis. We first remarked the necessity and urgency of antimonopoly in the realm of intellectual property in our country. Then expatiated the correlated standing regulations in our legal system, and indicated it's deep reasons of history and institution. In the end we try to propose the detailed regulation system in antimonopoly of intellectual property from the respects of basic principle, running mechanism, regulation system and it's detailed form, antimonopoly control mode, etc.
引文
1.吴汉东、胡开忠等著:《走向知识经济时代的知识产权法》,法律出版社2002年版
    2.郑成思著:《知识产权法》,法律出版社2003年版
    3.[美]罗伯特·考特、托马斯·尤伦:《法和经济学》,张军等译,上海三联书店、上海人民出版社1994年版
    4.张文显主编:《法理学》,高等教育出版社、北京大学出版社,1999年版
    5.李扬主编:《知识产权的合理性、危机及其未来模式》,法律出版社,2003年版
    6.李明德著:《美国知识产权法》,法律出版社,2003年版
    7.[日]富田彻男著:《市场竞争中的知识产权》,商务印书馆,2000年版
    8.林诚二著:《民法理论与问题研究》,中国政法大学出版社,2000年版
    9.[美]Jay Dratler,Jr.著:《知识产权许可》,王春燕等译,清华大学出版社2003年版
    10.王先林著:《知识产权于反垄断:知识产权滥用的反垄断法问题研究》,法律出版社2001年版
    11.陈昌柏著:《知识产权经济学》,北京大学出版社2003年版
    12.程宝山著:《经济法基本理论研究》,郑州大学出版社2003年版
    13.理查德·A·波斯纳著:《正义/司法的经济学》,苏力译,中国政法大学出版社2002年版
    14.庄子银、杜娟:《发展中国家加强知识产权保护的成本—收益分析》,《华东经济管理》2003年2月
    15.王源扩:《试论与知识产权有关的反竞争性为及其法律控制》,中国民商法律网www.civillaw.com.cn
    16.杨明:《知识产权与反不正当竞争中的利益衡量》,中国民商法律网www.civillaw.com.cn
    17.冯晓青:《论知识产权的若干限制》,《中国人民大学学报》2004年第1期
    18.胡文明:《入世后知识产权领域的反垄断问题研究》,《深圳大学学报(人文社会科学版)》2003年7月
    19.黄龙:《知识产权垄断及其法律规制》,北大法律信息网www.chinalawinfo.com
    20.林立新、历永:《知识产权法与竞争法的冲突与协调——来自欧盟的经验及启示》,《政治与法律》2000年第2期
    
    
    21.王先林:《日本关于知识产权滥用的反垄断控制及其借鉴意义》,《知识产权》2002年第2期
    22.尹新天:《TRIPS协议与制止知识产权的滥用》,《科技与法律季刊》2000年第2期
    23.段永朝:《微软判决对中国的影响》,《光明日报》2000年5月17日
    24.王先林:《对思科、华为知识产权之争中的“私有协议”垄断问题的思考》,《中南大学学报(社会科学版)》2003年第4期
    25.杨华权:《滥用技术标准的对策——从思科诉华为侵犯知识产权案说起》,《企业标准化》2003年第3期
    26.王先林:《合理与适度:知识产权保护的另一面》,中国民商法律网www.civillaw.com
    1. Ernest Geiihorn, William E.Kovacic: 《Antitrust Law and Economics》, West Publishing Co., 1994
    2. Commission on Intellectual Property Rights: 《Integrating Intellectual Property Rights and Development Policy》 , www.ipcommission.org/graphic/documents/final report.htm
    3. U.S. Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission: 《Antitrust Guidelines for the Licensing of Intellectual Property》, www.usdoj.gov/atr/public/guidelines/ipguide.htm
    4. Toshiaki takigawa: 《Antitrust Intervention in Intellectual Property Licensing and Unilateral Refusal to License: a comparative analysis of Japanese and U.S. policies》, Antitrust Biueetin, New York, Winter 2003, Vol. 48, Iss. 4; pg. 885, 37 pgs
    5. Alden F Abbott: 《Intellectual Property Licensing and Antitrust Policy: a Comparative Perspective》 , Law and Policy in international business, Washington, Summer 2003, Vol. 34, Iss. 4; pg. 801, 27 pgs
    6. Hanns Ulrich: 《IP-antitrust in context: approaches to international rules on restrictive uses of intellectual property fights 》 , Antitrust Blueetin, New York, Winter 2003, Vol. 48, Iss. 4; pg. 885, 37 pgs
    7. Koki Arai: 《Recent development of Japanese antitrust policy regarding intellectual property fights》 , Antitrust Blueetin, New York, Fall 2001, Vol. 46, Iss. 3; pg. 591, 19 pgs
    8. Dale A Rice, Thomas P Brown: 《Antitrust and intellectual property licenses》 ,Computer and Internet Lawyer, Frederick: Dec 2001. Vol. 18, Iss. 12; pg. 18, 7 pgs