一项关于教师期望对初中生二语学习成就动机影响的实证研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
成就动机通常被认为是决定二语学习成败与否的重要因素之一。国内外学者们纷纷著书立作对其定义和理论背景进行研究,但是关于如何在课堂内激发学习者成就动机的实证研究却为数不多,而从教师期望效应的角度去探讨如何增强学习者成就动机的研究则尚不多见。
     本研究以教师期望效应和成就动机理论为基础,旨在探讨教师期望在二语学习中对学生成就动机的影响以及如何通过改善教师的言语和非言语行为以增强学生的成就动机。本研究主要探讨了以下三个问题:1.教师是如何通过其言语和非言语行为来传递对不同学生的期望;2.教师期望与学生成就动机之间的关系;3.教师言语和非言语行为的改善是否有助于增强学生的成就动机。
     某中学初二年级两个班级的104名学生参与了本次调查,其中一个班级(53名学生)为实验组,另一个班级(51名学生)则为控制组。实验组英语教师接受了关于改善教师期望的培训。在三个月的研究期间,作者采用问卷调查与课堂观察的方式进行数据收集。实验组和控制组学生分别接受了问卷调查的前测与后测,以评测他们所感知到的教师支持以及他们在英语科目上的成就动机。
     通过对研究结果的分析,我们发现实验组教师参与教师期望培训后,其言语和非言语行为都得到了较大的改善。同时,实验组学生所感知到的教师支持显著多于控制组学生,其在英语科目上的成就动机也显著高于控制组学生。数据分析进一步表明,教师期望与学生成就动机显著相关:感知到更多积极的教师期望的学生,其成就动机也更强,而感知到更多消极的教师期望的学生,其成就动机则更弱。
     本研究表明积极的教师期望是增强学生二语学习成就动机的一种有效的方法。因此,本研究对英语教师该如何利用积极的教师期望以增强学生的成就动机以及促进学生的学业发展具有一定的启示。
Achievement motivation is generally considered to be one of the primary causes of success and failure in second language learning. There have been numerous studies on this factor, which mainly concentrate on the description of its definitions and analyses of its theoretical bases. However, only a few empirical studies have been conducted on how to enhance students' achievement motivation in classroom settings, and the empirical studies done from the perspective of teacher expectation effects are even fewer owing to various reasons.
     Based on teacher expectation effects and achievement motivation theory, this study aims to examine the role of teacher expectations in affecting students' achievement motivation in L2 learning and explore how to enhance students' achievement motivation through the improvement of teachers' verbal and nonverbal behaviors. The study has been conducted mainly to address the following questions: 1. How teachers convey their expectations to students through verbal and nonverbal behaviors? 2. What is the relationship between teacher expectations and students' achievement motivation? 3. Whether the improvement of the teacher's verbal and nonverbal behaviors helps to enhance students' achievement motivation?
     This study has involved 104 second-year middle school students from two classes which were divided into two groups, with one class (53 students) as the experimental group, while the other (51 students) as the control group. The English teacher of the experimental group received teacher training based on TESA (Teacher Expectations and Student Achievement) training program. The study lasted three months with data collected regarding the students' perception of supporting behaviors from their homeroom English teacher and their achievement motivation on the subject of English by means of questionnaires and classroom observations. Both questionnaires were administered to the two groups before and after the teacher training.
     The results of the study reveal that the English teacher who received teacher training got a significant improvement on both verbal and nonverbal behaviors. Accordingly, the students in the experimental group received more supporting from their English teacher and has stronger achievement motivation than the control group did. Data analyses further suggest that there exists a significant correlation between teacher expectations and students' achievement motivation, i.e., the students who perceived more positive teacher expectations tend to have stronger achievement motivation, while those who perceived less positive or more negative teacher expectations tend to have weaker achievement motivation.
     The findings from the study indicate that teacher expectations offer an effective way for enhancing students' achievement motivation in L2 learning. Thus, they have wider implications for English teachers on how to make use of positive teacher expectations to enhance students' achievement motivation and facilitate students' learning.
引文
Ashton,R & R.Webb.1986.Making a Difference:Teachers'Sense of Efficacy and Student Achievement.New York,NY:Longman.
    Alison,J.1993.Not Bothered? Motivating Reluctant Language Learners in Key Stage 4.London:CILT.
    Atkinson,J.1964.An Introduction to Motivation.Princeton,NJ:Van Nostrand.
    Atkinson,J.& N.Feather.1966.A Theory of Achievement Motivation.New York:Wiley and Sons.
    Atkinson,J.& D.Birch.1974.The dynamics of achievement-oriented activity.In Atkinson,J.& J.Raynor(eds.)Motivation and Achievement,271-325.Washington,DC:Winston & Sons.
    Babad,E.,J.Inbar.& R.Rosenthal.1982.Pygmalion,Galatea,and the Golem:Investigations of biased and unbiased teachers.Journal of Educational Psychology 74,459-474.
    Babad,E.1990.Measuring and changing teachers' differential behavior as perceived by students and teachers.Journal of Social Psychology 82:683-690.
    Babad,E.1993.Teachers' differential behavior.Educational Psychology Review 5:347-376.
    Bandura, A. 1997. Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. In Keogh, B.K. (ed.) Risk, Families and Schools: Focus on Exceptional Children, 1-12. New York: W.H. Freeman.
    Braun, C. 1973. Johnny reads the cues: Teacher expectation. The Reading Teacher 26: 704-712.
    Braun, C. 1976. Teacher expectation: Socio-psychological dynamics. Review of Educational Research 40: 185-213.
    Brookover, W. & Lezotte, L. 1979. Changes in School Characteristics Coincident with Changes in Student Achievement. East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University, College of Urban Development.
    Brophy, J. & T. Good. 1970. Teachers' communication of differential expectations for children's classroom performance: Some behavioral data. Journal of Educational Psychology 61: 365-374.
    Brophy, J. & T. Good. 1974. Teacher-Student Relationship: Causes and Consequences. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
    Brophy, J. & T. Good. 1986. Teacher behavior and student achievement In Wittrock, M. (Ed.) Handbook of Research on Teaching, 328-341. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.
    
    Brophy, J. 1998. Moivating Students to Learn. Boston, MA:McGraw-Hill.
    Brown, H. 1994. Teaching by Principles. New York : Prentice Hall.
    Chambers, G. 1999. Motivating Language Learners. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
    Cooper,H.1979.Pygmalion grows up:A model for teacher expectation communication and performance influence.Review of Eucational Research 49,389-410.
    Cooper,H.1982.Scientific guidelines for conducting integrative research reviews.Review of Educational Research 52,291-302.
    Cooper,H.& T.Good.1983.Pygmalion Grows up:Studies in the Expectation Communication Process.New York:Longman.
    Csikszentmihalyi,M.1997.Instrinsic motivation and effective teaching:A flow analysis.In Bess,J.(ed.)Teaching Well and Liking It:Motivating Faculty to Teach Effectively,72-89.Baltimore:Johns Hopkins University Press.
    Darley,J.& R.Fazio.1980.Expectancy confirmation processes arising in the social interaction sequence.American Psychologist 35.867-881.
    Dornyei,Z.1994a.Motivation and motivating in the foreign language classroom.Modern Language Journal 78:273-284.
    Dornyei,Z.& I.Otto.1998.Motivation in action:A process model of L2motivation.Working Papers in Applied Linguistics(Thames Valley University,London)4:43-69.
    Flanders,N.1970.Analyzing Teaching Behavior.Reading,MA:Addison Wesley.
    Gardner,R.1985.Social Psychology and Second Language Learning: The Role of Attitudes and Motivation. London: Edward Arnold.
    Gjesme, T. & R. Nygard. 1970. Achievement-Related Motives: Theoretical Considerations and Constructions of a Measuring Instrument. Unpublished meanuscript, University of Oslo.
    Good, T. 1987. Two decades of research on teacher expectations: Findings and future directions. Journal of Teacher Education 38(4): 32-47.
    Harris, M. 1985. Models of teacher expectation communication. In Dusek, J. (Ed.) Teacher Expectancies, 135-158. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    Keogh, B. 2000. Risk, families and schools. Focus on Exceptional Children 33(4): 1-12.
    Lennon, P. 1993. The advanced learner: affective, social and motivational factors. Language Learning Journal 8: 39-43.
    Lezotte, L. 1990. Lessons learned. In Taylor, B. (Ed.) Case Studies in Effective Schools Research, 195-199. Madison, WI: National Center for Effective Schools Research and Development.
    Lumsden, L. 1997. Expectations for students. ERIC document. ED 409 609.
    Merton, R. 1948. The self—fulfilling prophecy. Antioch Review 8: 193-210.
    Muller, C, S. Katz. & J. Dance. 1999. Investing in teaching and learning. Urban Education 34:292-337.
    Numan,D.1991.Language Teaching Methodology—A Textbook for Teachers.Hemel Hempstead:Prentice Hall.
    Ory,J.& J.Poggio.1994.The Empirical Development of A Measure of Achievement Motivation,Vol.64,No.3:363-423.
    Oxford,R.& J.Shearin.1994.Language learning motivation:Expanding the theoretical framework.Modern Language Journal 78:12-28.
    Oxford,R.(ed.)1996.Language Learning Motivation:Pathways to the New Century.Honolulu:University of Hawaii Press.
    Ramirez,A.1995.Creating Contexts for Second Language Acquisition:Theory and Methods.White Plains,N.Y.:Longman Publishers.
    Reynolds,D.& C.Teddlie.2000.The processes of school effectiveness.In Teddlie.C.& D.Reynolds(Eds.)The International Handbook of School Effectiveness Research,134-159.London:Falmer Press.
    Rosenshine,B.1971.Teaching Behaviors and Student Axhievement.London:National Foundation for Education Research.
    Rosenthal,R.& L.Jacobson.1968a.Pygmalion in the Classroom:Teacher Expectations and Pupils'Intellectual Development.New York:Holt,Rinehart & Winston.
    Rosenthal,R.1974.On the Social Psychology of the Self-fuelling Prophecy:Further Evidence for Pygmalion Effects and Their Mediating Mechanisms.New York:MSS Modular Publications.
    Rothenberg, C. & D. Fisher. 2007. Teaching English Language Learners: A Differential Approach. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson, Merrill Prentice Hall
    Ryan, R. & J. Stiller. 1991. The social contexts of internalization: Parent and teacher influences on autonomy, motivation, and learning. In Pintrich, P. & M. Maehr (eds.) Advances in Motivation and Achievement, vol. 7: 115-149. Greenwich, CT: JAP Press.
    Schmidt, R., D. Boraie. & 0. Kassabgy. 1996. Foreign language motivation: Internal structure and external connections. In Oxford, R. (ed.) Language Learning Motivation: Pathways to the New Century, 9-70. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii Press.
    Schumann, J. 1998. The Neurobiology of Affect in Language. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
    Smey-Richman, B. 1989. Teacher expectations and low—achieving students. Philadelphia: Research for Better Schools, (ERIC Accession No. ED 328 627).
    Smith, E. & D. Mackie. 1995. Social Psychology. New York: Worth.
    Solomon. D. & J. Yaeger. 1969. Determinants of boys' perceptions of verbal reinforcers. Developmental Psychology 1: 637-645.
    Stayrook, N., L. Corno. & P. Winne. 1978. Path analyses relating student perceptions of teacher behavior to student achievement. Journal of Teacher Education 29: 51-56
    Stipek, D. & J. Weisz. 1981. Perceived personal control and academic achievement. Review of Educational Research 51: 101-137
    Tauber, R. 1997. Self-fulfilling Prophecy: A Practical Guide to Its Use in Education. Westport, CT: Praeger.
    Teacher Expectations and Student Achievement (TESA) coordinator manual. 1993. Downey, CA: Los Angeles County Office of Education.
    Tschannen-Moran, M. & A. Hoy. 2001. Teacher efficacy: Capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education 17(7): 783-805
    Weiner, B. 1979. A theory of motivation for some classroom experiences. Journal of Educational Psychology 71: 3-25.
    Weiner, B. 1994. Integrating social and personal theories of achievement motivation. Review of Educational Research 64: 57-73.
    Weinstein, R. & S. Middlestadt 1979. Learning about the achievement hierarchy of the classroom: Through children's eyes. Paper presented at meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
    Weinstein, R., M. Mehorn. & K. Simontacchi. 1991. Expectations and high school change: Teacher-researcher collaboration to prevent school failure. American Journal of Community Psychology 19: 1-8.
    Weinstein, R. 2002. Reaching Higher: The Power of Expectations in Schooling.Cambridge,MA:Harvard University Press.
    Wigfield,A.& J.Eccles.2000.Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation.Contemporary Educational Psychology 25:68-81.
    Williams,M.& R.Burden.1997.Psychology for Language Teachers.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
    丁蕙,屠国元,2004,教师期望效应的理论解析及其应用,《郑州大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》,第37卷,第1期,155-157页。
    丁蕙,屠国元,2004,强化期望效应教育智慧,《教育理论与实践》,第24卷,第1期,54-56页。
    丁蕙,屠国元,2006,教师期望效应理论研究及对教育的启示,《教育评论》,第1期,24-27页。
    李萌,张春妹,2002,大学生、研究生的成就动机水平的测量与分析,《内蒙古师范大学学报》,第3期,70-72页。
    刘丽红,陈澎,1997,教师期望效应传递机制的研究,《教育探索》,第2期,20-22页。
    秦晓晴,2002,大学生外语学习归因倾向及其对归因现象的理解,《现代外语》第1期,71-78页。
    文秋芳,2001,英语学习者动机、观念、策略的变化规律与特点,《外语教学与研究》第3期,105-160页。
    张兴贵,2000,成就动机研究的回顾与展望,《湛江师范学院学报》,第1期,101-105页。
    张兴贵,2002,初中生成就动机与学业成绩相关性研究,《宁波大学学报》,第1期,31-33页。
    周星,周韵,2002,大学英语课堂教师话语的调查与分析,《外语教学与研究》,第34期(1),59-68页。
    郑海燕,2005,教师期望的改变对初中生自我价值感及动机信念影响的实验研究,《心理发展与教育》,第1期,43-47页。