摘要
目的
客观评价针灸从心肾论治颈椎病颈痛的临床疗效,为中医脏腑论治颈椎病颈痛提供新的理论。
方法
1、病源主要来自于广东省中医院针灸科,将符合颈椎病颈痛诊断标准的患者70例,采用简单随机对照试验方法,运用PEMS3.1软件包按1：1的比例随机分为心肾论治组(心肾组)和常规针灸治疗组(常规组)两组,每组各35例,心肾组接受从心肾论治针灸治疗,常规组接受常规针灸治疗。
2、治疗方法：
(1)心肾组：取穴：百劳(双)、神门(单)、腕骨(单)交替,刺入穴位深度约10-30mm,得气后留针30分钟,每隔10分钟运针一次；直接灸：大椎、心俞(双)及肾俞(双),每穴各五壮；穴位埋皮内针：百劳(双)、心俞(单)及肾俞(单)；
(2)常规组：取穴：百劳(双)、中渚(双),刺入穴位深度约10-30mm,得气后留针30分钟,每隔10分钟运针一次；直接灸：大椎、百劳(双)及肩中俞(双),每穴各五壮；穴位埋皮内针：百劳(双)及肩中俞(双)；
(3)以上两组均每周进行2-3次治疗,10次治疗为1疗程,完成8次治疗可纳入研究,1疗程结束后观察疗效。
3、根据《中医病证诊断疗效标准》评价近期及远期疗效,运用卡方检验比较两组间总体疗效及愈显率,并分别记录两组治疗前、第五次治疗结束、疗程结束及疗程结束一月、三月后NPQ、MCGLII疼痛量表评分,采用SNK-q检验及t检验比较两组治疗前后及两组间的差异。
结果
1、两组疗程结束时总体疗效比较,经Ridit分析,P>0.05,两组近期总体疗效无显著性差异；经X2检验,两组疗程结束时治愈率、显效率、好转率比较,均P>0.05,两组近期愈显率无显著性差异。两组随访3月总体疗效比较,经Ridit分析,P<0.05,心肾组远期总体疗效优于常规组；随访3月时心肾组愈显率65.63%,常规组愈显率39.4%,经X2检验,P<0.05,差异有显著性意义,心肾组随访3月愈显率明显高于常规组。
2、两组NPQ颈痛评分比较,在第五次治疗结束、随访1月、随访3月时常规组NPQ颈痛评分明显高于心肾组,在第五次治疗结束、随访1月时,经t检验,P＜0.05,随访三月时,经t检验,P<0.01,均有显著性差异。两组在治疗第五次结束时、疗程结束时、随访1月及随访3月时NPQ颈痛评分与治疗前比较,经SNK-q检验,P<0.01,有显著性差异,NPQ颈痛评分较治疗前均有明显下降。
3、两组MCGILL疼痛评分比较,在疗程结束、随访1月、随访3月时常规组McGILL疼痛评分明显高于心肾组,疗程结束时,经t检验,P<0.05,随访1月、随访3月时,经t检验,P<0.01,均有显著性差异。两组在第五次治疗结束、疗程结束、随访1月及随访3月时McGILL疼痛评分与治疗前比较,经SNK-q检验,P<0.01,有显著性差异,McGILL疼痛评分较治疗前均有明显下降。
结论
本研究通过心肾论治组与常规针灸治疗组在改善颈椎病颈痛方面进行对比,结果显示两组对颈椎病颈痛均有改善作用,近期疗效无明显差异,远期疗效心肾组优于常规组。
Objective
To assess the clinical efficacy of acupuncture and moxibustion for the Neck Pain of Cervical Spondylosis from Treatment of heart and kidney, to shed new light on Traditional Chinese Medicine Treatment of organs for Cervical Spondylosis Neck Pain.
Methods
Seventy patients with cervical spondylosis neck pain were randomly divided into two groups with PEM3.1 Software:Treatment of heart and kidney group (Heart and Kidney Group) and general acupuncture treatment group (General Group) with thirty five cases each. Heart and Kidney Group received treatment of heart and kidney while General Group received general acupuncture treatment.
Heart and Kidney Group:Choose Bailao (ExHN 15) double, Shenme(HT7) single and Wangu(SI4) single, then penetrate into these points with a depth about 10-30mm, each point retaining the needle for 30 minutes long after getting the Qior the feeling of acupuncture, then manipulating the needle once every 10 min, meanwhile proceed direct moxibustion to Dazhui(DU14), Xinshu(BL15) double, Shenshu (BL23) double five times each, At the end, place intradermal needles at the following ponits:Bailao(ExHN15) double, Xinshu(BL15) single, Shenshu(BL23) single.
General Group:Choose Bailao(ExHN15)double and Zhongzhu (SJ3) double, then give direct moxibustion to Dazhui (DU14), Bailao(EXHN15) double, Jianzhongshu (SI15) double, finally inset intradermal needles at Bailao(ExHN 15) double, Jianzhongshu(SI15) double, as all the operations described in the Heart and Kidney Group. Each group received two or three periods of treatment once a week, ten times for a course, then observe therapeutic effect after one course of the treatment.
Evaluate Short-term and long-term efficiency based on the Clinical standards for TCM Syndrome Clinic. Use chi-square test to compare the differences of overall efficiency and markedly effective rate between two groups. Patients were examined by NPQ and McGill before treatment, at the end of the fifth treatment, immediately after the course, one month and three months later. Inter-group comparison was made by Variance Analysis. SNK-q test and t-test were used to compare the difference before and after treatment, as well as the difference between the two groups.
Results
The short-term (immediately after treatment) difference was not significant between the two groups, according to the result of Ridit Analysis(P>0.05). Neither the cured rate nor the markedly effective rate in both groups has significant difference according to X2Analysis(P>0.05). As to the overall efficiency of long-term (three months after treatment) both groups, Heart and Kidney Group overall efficiency is superior to General Group, according to Ridit Analysis(P<0.05), with the rates of 65.63% and 39.4%, separately. Nevertheless, the cured and markedly effective rates of Heart and Kidney Group were much higher than General Group when comparing results of immediately three months after treatment, according to X2 Analysis (P<0.05).
The NPQ scores of General Group were higher than Heart and Kidney Group at the end of the fifth treatment, one month and three months after treatment. And there were significant differences between the two groups, at the end of the fifth treatment and one month (P<0.05)and three months (P<0.01) after treatment according to t-test Analysis. The NPQ scores of the fifth treatment, immediately after treatment, one month after treatment and three months after treatment of the two groups were less than they were before the treatment, according to SNK-q Analysis(P<0.01).
The McGill scores of General Group were greater than Heart and Kidney Group at the time immediately after treatment, one month after treatment and three months after treatment. And there was significant difference between the two groups, after treatment (P<0.05), one month after treatment and three months after treatment (P<0.01) according to t-test Analysis. The McGill score the fifth end of treatment, immediately after treatment, one month after treatment and three months after treatment of two groups was less than before treatment respectively. There was significant difference between two groups(P< 0.01).
Conclusions
On the release of cervical spondylosis neck pain, both groups have certain therapeutic effect. No significant difference in curative effect, But the long-term effect of Heart and Kidney Group is superior to General Group.
引文
[1]陈丽贤,陈淑曼,黄敏仪,等.颈脊柱推拿对减轻慢性颈痛患者肘屈肌抑制机制研究[J].中国临床康复,2003,7(2)：198-199.
[2]顾伟民,陆耀刚,王明辉,等.经皮电刺激在周围神经嵌压治疗中的应用[J].中国临床康复,2003,7(2)：298-299.
[3]施杞,王和鸣.中医骨伤科学[M].北京：中国中医药出版社,1999.30-36.
[4]周立武.颈椎病诊断与针灸推拿治疗规范化临床研究[J].光明中医,2007,22(7)：2-4.
[5]孙肖雷.颈椎病研究进展.中国医药导报,2008,5(24)：26-28.
[6]Jackson R. The cervical syndrome and spring filed[J]. Charles Th omas, 1985,4:26.
[7]王以进,王介麟.骨科生物力学[M].北京：人民军医出版社,1989.232.
[8]Seidel H. Long-term efects of whold-boby vibration, a cervical surrey [J] Int Arch Occup Health,1986,58:1.
[9]Jackson R. The cervical syndrome[M]. USA:Th omas Publisher,1978.56.
[10]朱晓平,文幸,李勇.苍龟探穴针法治疗颈型颈椎病36例[J].中国临床康复,2006,10(15)：162-163.
[11]赵英,何浪.颈椎病的发病机制及相关因素[J].中国社区医师,2008,24(11)：12.
[12]罗建平,欧阳松,李先棵.颈椎病常见的病因病理分析[J].内蒙古中医,2008,25(7)：35-37.
[13]潘之清.实用脊柱病学[M].济南：山东科学技术出版社,1997.72.
[14]王拥军,施杞.关于颈椎病的理论与临床探讨[J].中国中医骨伤科杂志,1997,5(3)：60.
[15]Mendel T, Aralk. Th ehistology of lumbar intervertebral discs [J]. soine, 1992,17:32.
[16]陈剑明,彭丽辉,张伟.针刺列缺穴为主治疗颈椎病40例疗效观察[J].贵阳中医学院学报,2007,29(6)：40-42.
[17]梁兆晖,朱晓平,伍洲梁,等.针刺治疗慢性颈椎病颈痛疗效评价[J].新中医,2008,40(10)：70-72.
[18]李建平.电针治疗颈椎病的临床研究[J].辽宁中医药大学学报,2008,10(10)：124-125.
[19]王爱玲.电针治疗神经根型颈椎病56例[J].中医外治杂志,2009,4：45.
[20]符文彬,郭元琦,陈丽仪,等.腹针治疗颈型颈椎病63例观察[J].中医药学刊, 2005,23(3)：539-540.
[21]宣丽华,甘海球.腹针治疗神经根型颈椎病的临床研究[J].中华中医药学刊,2008,26(10)：2126-2127.
[22]李丽霞,林国华,庄礼兴,等.压灸百会穴为主治疗椎动脉型颈椎病30例疗效观察[J].新中医,2005,37(9)：54-55.
[23]李志宏,李冬梅.温针治疗顽固性神经根型颈椎病47例[J].云南中医中药杂志,2009,30(6)：46.
[24]彭良.温针灸夹脊穴治疗颈椎病60例[J].山西中医,2005,21(2)：37.
[25]梁来德.脊柱推拿治疗神经根型颈椎病的临床观察[J].中国医药指南,2009,18：53-54.
[26]沈丽.穴位注射综合治疗颈椎病疗效观察[J].上海针灸杂志,2008,27(4).19-20
[27]刘国萍.小针刀治疗颈椎病30例[J].齐齐哈尔医学院学报,2008,29(7)：833.
[28]李涛,孙治东.穴位埋线治疗颈型颈椎病56例[J].上海针灸杂志,2003,22(12)：34.
[29]葛锡鹏.耳穴压丸法治疗颈性眩晕200例[J].中医外治杂志,2000,9(6)：43.
[30]宋吉岩,郑军.火针疗法治疗颈型颈椎病临证举隅[J].吉林中医药,2008,28(8)：597.
[31]梁建新.铍针治疗颈型颈椎病60例临床观察[J].北京中医药,2008,27(7)：544-545.
[32]耿引,循于娟,胡姗姗,等.砭石疗法治疗颈型颈椎病30例[J].河北中医,2007,29(12)：1109-1110.
[33]贺振刚,刘少鸿.针灸推拿治疗颈椎病50例临床体会[J].临床医药实践,2009,18(9)：283284.
[34]栾晓梅,刘仍军.针灸配合牵引、手法治疗神经根型颈椎病[J].长春中医药大学学报,2009,25(2)：207.
[35]姜京明,廖恒,陈秘密,等.针刺加穴位注射治疗神经根型颈椎病的临床疗效观察[J].针灸临床杂志,2009,25(5)：6-7.
[36]李畅居,卢祖仪.从肝肾辨治颈椎病53例[J].新中医,2000,32(12)：42.
[37]王元元.中药补肾养肝治疗颈椎病体会[J].山西预防医学,2002,11(2)：219.
[38]曹维娜.颈椎病的中医辨治与临床分析[J].中国现代药物应用,2009,9：111.
[39]于竹力.从肾虚血淤论治椎动脉型颈椎病[J].黑龙江医药,1999,12(3).
[40]徐宁.补肾活血法在痹证中的应用[J].山西中医,1993,9(5)：10-111.
[41]叶秀兰,谢兴文,李宁,等.从肝、脾、肾论治颈椎病一施杞教授治疗颈椎病学术思想之一[J].中国中医骨伤科杂志,2005,13(4)：46-47.
[42]马旭,李继良.中医药治疗颈椎病心得[J].中国医药指南,2009,7(13)：118-119.