在位企业如何开拓新技术市场:基于中标软件案例
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:How Incumbent Enterprises Develop New Technology Market: A Case Study of CS2C
  • 作者:王钧 ; 胡京波
  • 英文作者:WANG Jun;HU Jing-bo;School of Economics and Management, Beihang University;School of Business Administration, Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics;
  • 关键词:技术创新 ; 人力资本 ; 广义虚拟经济 ; 新技术商业化 ; 双元能力
  • 英文关键词:technology innovation;;human capital;;generalized virtual economy;;new technology commercialization;;ambidexterity capability
  • 中文刊名:广义虚拟经济研究
  • 英文刊名:Research on the Generalized Virtual Economy
  • 机构:北京航空航天大学经济管理学院;江西财经大学工商管理学院;
  • 出版日期:2019-03-15
  • 出版单位:广义虚拟经济研究
  • 年:2019
  • 期:01
  • 基金:国家自然科学基金资助项目(71472012;71529001;71632003);; 教育部人文社会科学研究规划青年基金项目(17YJC630040);; 江西省社会科学规划青年博士基金项目(17BJ37)
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:63-70
  • 页数:8
  • CN:11-5905/F
  • ISSN:1674-9448
  • 分类号:F273.1
摘要
广义虚拟经济背景下,不断进行技术创新并提供客户需要的新产品是企业可持续发展的重要手段,人力资本对于企业技术创新至关重要。本文采用案例研究方法,以中标软件为研究对象,研究了企业成功进行技术创新的内在机理。研究发现,企业技术创新过程中面临利用性创新和探索性创新的悖论,双元能力能够化解悖论,高层管理者通过激励政策、信息分享渠道、组织学习的整合机制可以促进员工与新技术的"链接",从而成功推动了技术创新。
        In the age of generalized virtual economy, technology innovation and new product base on new technology commercialization has become an important means to gain competitive advantage. Human capital is very important for technology innovation. This paper takes CS2 C as a case to explain how enterprises success-fully promote technology innovation and commercialization. The findings show that: there are strategic paradoxes between exploitative and exploratory businesses in process of incumbent enterprises technology innovation, and ambidexterity capabilities is the key to resolving strategic paradox, three types integration mechanism, such as incentive measures, information sharing channels, and organizational learning can facilitate the ‘linkages' between employee and the nee the technology and then this can promote technology innovation commercialization successfully.
引文
[1]林左鸣.广义虚拟经济与微观层面的企业经营实践[J].广义虚拟经济研究,2010,1(1):5-28.
    [2]Bergek A,Berggren C,Magnusson T,et al.Technological Discontinuities and the Challenge for Incumbent Firms:Destruction,Disruption or Creative Accumulation?[J].IEEE Engineering Management Review,2013, 42(6-7):1210-1224.
    [3]周宁.浅谈广义虚拟经济视角下的企业技术创新[J].广义虚拟经济研究,2014,5(2):91-96.
    [4]林左鸣.广义虚拟经济论要[J].上海大学学报(社会科学版),2011,18(5):1-15.
    [5]Christensen C M.The Ongoing Process of Building a Theory of Disruption[J].Journal of Product Innovation Management,2006,23(1):39-55.
    [6]Freeman C.The Economics of Industrial Innovation[J].Social Science Electronic Publishing,1989,7(2):215-219.
    [7]Tushman M L,O’Reilly C A.Ambidextrous Organizations:Managing Evolutionary and Revolutionary Change[J].California Management Review,1996,38(4):8-30.
    [8]Chandy K,Rajesh K,Gerard J.The Incumbent′s Curse?Incumbency,Size and Radical Product Innovation[J]. Journal of mar-keting,2000,64(3):1-17.
    [9]Zahra S A,George G.Absorptive Capacity:A Review,Reconceptualization,and Extension[J].The Academy of Management Review,2002,27(2):185-203.
    [10]蒋国平,葛明慧.企业突破性技术创新的管理方法[J].经济与管理,2007(10):16-17.
    [11]陈立新.现有企业的突破性技术创新决策过程研究[J].企业活力,2008,(6):24-25.
    [12]Leifer R.Radical Innovation:How Mature Companies Can Outsmart Upstarts[M].Harvard Business School Press,2000.
    [13]邵云飞,詹坤.突破性技术创新:理论综述与研究展望[J].技术经济,2017,36(4):30-37.
    [14]Iii C A O,Tushman M L.Organizational Ambidexterity:Past,Present,and Future[J].Social Science Electronic Publishing.2013,27(4):324-338.
    [15]Güttel,W H,Konlechner S W,Trede J K.Standardized Individuality Versus Individualized Standardization:the Role of the Context in Structurally Ambidextrous Organizations[J].Review of Managerial Science,2015,9,261-284.
    [16]Subramaniam M,Youndt M A.The Influence of Intellectual Capital on the Types of Innovative Capabilities[J]. Academy of Management Journal,2005,48(3):450-463.
    [17]Winne S D,Sels L.Interrelationships Between Human Capital,HRM and Innovation in Belgian Start- ups Aiming at an Innova-tion Strategy[J].International Journal of Human Resource Management,2010, 21(11):1863-1883.
    Martin G,Pear J.Behavior Modification:What It Is and How to Do It[M].New York:Prentice Hall,2003.
    [19]欧阳桃花.试论工商管理学科的案例研究方法[J].南开管理评论,2004,7(2):100-105.
    [20]Eisenhardt K M,Graebner M E.Theory Building from Cases:Opportunities and Challenges[J].Academy of Management Jour-nal,2007,50(1):25-32.
    [21]Klein H K,Myers M D.A Set of Principles for Conducting and Evaluating Interpretive Field Studies in Information Systems[J].MIS Quarterly,1999,23(1):67-93.
    [22]Andriopoulos C,Lewis MW.Exploitation Exploration Tensions and Organizational Ambidexterity:Managing Paradoxes of Innovation[J].Organization Science,2009,20(4),696-717.