摘要
以西安市有代表性的5种建筑垃圾资源化利用模式为研究对象,将经典的层次分析法和模糊层次分析法相结合应用到直觉模糊决策环境中,提出一种基于直觉模糊层次分析法的建筑垃圾资源化利用评估模型,从系统决策视角进行考虑,建立评价层次结构图并对5种模式进行排序。结果表明:进行现场破碎后再集中外运,并结合再生砌块和回填路基模式效果最优。
Taking 5 typical construction waste resource utilization models in Xi'an as the research object,this paper extends the classic analytic hierarchy process( AHP) and fuzzy analytic hierarchy process( FAHP) to intuitionistic fuzzy decision environment,and proposes an evaluation model of construction waste resource utilization. A hierarchical structure of evaluation and a sort of 5 models are set up from the perspective of system decision-making. The results show that the effect is best which the construction waste is broken in site and then transported outwards,combining recycled block and backfill subgrade.
引文
[1]刘红勇,袁梦婷,吴之路,等. PPP模式下建筑垃圾资源化处理项目风险分担模型研究[J].科技进步与对策,2017,34(9):92-96.
[2]孙金颖,陈家珑,周文娟.建筑垃圾资源化利用城市管理政策研究[M].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2016.
[3]周理乾.论系统科学与传统科学的不连续性及其哲学思考[J].系统科学学报,2017,25(2):1-6.
[4]李浩,翟宝辉.中国建筑垃圾资源化产业发展研究[J].城市发展研究,2015,22(3):1119-124.
[5]胡鸣明,张纯博,张倩,等.废弃混凝土回收利用公私合作机制设计[J].环境工程,2017,35(5):125-130.
[6]赵程伟,董雄报,洪青.基于混合VIKOR模型的建筑企业多项目优选分析[J].系统科学学报,2017,25(1):99-103.
[7]张尚,王涛,顾雪平.基于直觉模糊层次分析法的电网运行状态综合评估[J].电力系统自动化,2016,40(4):41-49.
[8]M. Yeheyis,K. Hewage,M. S. Alam,et al. An Overview of Construction and Demolition Waste Management in Canda:A Lifecycle Analysis Approach to Sustainability[J]. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy,2013,15(1):81-91.
[9]高青松,谢龙.建筑垃圾资源化产业链关键节点及产业发展驱动力研究[J].生态经济,2013(6):137-142.
[10]杨祎,赵平,陈梅丽.建筑垃圾资源化利用模式评价研究[J].工业安全与环保,2017,43(7):102-106.
[11]邹勇.基于DEA-ANP的两阶段物流供应商选择模型[J].系统科学学报,2017,25(3):74-78.
[12]H. S. Cha,J. Kim,J. Y. Han. Identifying and Assessing Influence Factors on Improving Waste Management Performance for Building Construction Projects[J]. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management,2009,135(7):647-656.
[13]K. T. Atanassov. Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets[J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems,1986,20:87-96.
[14]T. L. Saaty. Axiomatic Foundation of the Analytic Hierarchy Process[J]. Management Science,1986,32(7):841-855.
[15]T. L. Saaty. A Scaling Method for Priorities in a Hierarchical Structure[J]. Journal of Mathematical Psychology,2000,15(3):234-281.
[16]Z. S. Xu. Intuitionistic Preference Relations and Their Application in Group Decision Making[J]. Information Sciences,2007,177(11):2363-2379.
[17]Z. Xu,H. Liao. Intuitionistic Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process[J]. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems,2014,22(4):749-761.
[18]M. Xia,Z. Xu. On Consensus in Group Decision Making Based on Fuzzy Preference Relations[J]. Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing,2011,267:263-287.