对我国产业政策与企业研发投资制度背景的评论
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Comments on Institutional Background of Industrial Policies and R&D Investment in China
  • 作者:冯飞鹏 ; 韦琼华
  • 英文作者:FENG Fei-peng;WEI Qiong-hua;School of International Business, Guilin Tourism University;Library, Guilin Tourism University;
  • 关键词:产业政策 ; 研发投资 ; 制度背景
  • 英文关键词:industrial policies;;R&D investment;;institutional background
  • 中文刊名:唐山学院学报
  • 英文刊名:Journal of Tangshan University
  • 机构:桂林旅游学院国际商学院;桂林旅游学院图书馆;
  • 出版日期:2019-05-20
  • 出版单位:唐山学院学报
  • 年:2019
  • 期:03
  • 基金:国家自然科学基金项目(71272196);; 广西一流学科建设项目(CZ6101002);; 桂林旅游学院高层次人才科研启动基金项目(KJ0613004);桂林旅游学院重大课题(2018MP01)
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:77-85
  • 页数:9
  • CN:13-1336/G4
  • ISSN:1672-349X
  • 分类号:F120;F273.1
摘要
对我国产业政策和企业研发相关的制度背景作了梳理,并提出产业政策在促进企业创新行为方面应关注的细节:必须把私人部门的主动性纳入到公共政策框架中,发挥政府政策的战略引导和协调作用;对产业政策的分析,应把注意力集中在如何使政策过程变得更为合理,即如何设计一个能使私人部门与政府部门一起合作来解决生产领域问题的政策;政府部门与私人部门必须保持适当距离,力求使腐败和寻租最小化;针对那些限制"自主发现"活动的信息外部性,最优的政策是对新的、非传统产业的投资进行补贴,且将事前补贴与事后监督相结合;获得补贴的活动,必须明显具有提供外溢和示范效应的潜力。
        This paper reviews the institutional background of industrial policies and R & D in China,and proposes the details for the industrial policies to care in promoting innovative behavior of enterprises:The private sector initiative must be incorporated into the public policy framework so that the strategic direction and coordinated role of the governmental policies could be realized; The analysis of industrial policies should focus on how to make the policy process more reasonable,which means how to design a system that enables the private sectors and government departments to work together to solve the production problem; government departments and the private sectors must keep proper distance in order to minimize corruption and power rent-seeking;The optimal policy for the information externality limiting "self-discovery" activities is to subsidize the new and non-traditional industries, and subsidization before the case and supervision after it should be combined;The subsidies must have clear potential to provide spillover and demonstration effects.
引文
[1] 黄群慧,黄速建,王钦,等.中国产业发展和产业政策报告(2013)[M].北京:经济管理出版社,2015:67-72.
    [2] JNELLES T V.Constructing an entrepreneurial architecture:an emergent framework for studying the Contemporary University beyond the entrepreneurial turn[J].Innovative Higher Education,2010,35(3):161-176.
    [3] BROMLEY D W.Economic interests in institutions:the conceptual foundation of public policy[M].New York and Oxford:Basil Blackwell,1989:253-263.
    [4] 江小涓.中国推行产业政策中的公共选择问题[J].经济研究,1993(6):3-18.
    [5] 郭克莎,吕铁,周维富.20世纪以来产业经济学在中国的发展[J].上海行政学院学报,2001(1):67-77.
    [6] LINDBLOM C E.Politics and markets:the world’s political-economics systems[M].New York:Basic Books,1977.
    [7] SIMON H A.Administrative behavior[M].New York:The Free Press,1957.
    [8] WEBER M.Die drei reinen Typen der legitimen Herrschaft[M]//MOHR J C B.Gesammelte aufs?tze zur wissenschaftslehre.Tübingen:Mohr Siebeck,1988:475-488.
    [9] 周振华.产业政策分析的基本框架[J].当代经济科学,1990(6):26-32.
    [10] 王曦,陆荣.危机下四万亿投资计划的短期作用与长期影响[J].中山大学学报(社会科学版),2009(4):180-188.
    [11] 陈正洪.当代中国中长期科技规划历史与理念研究[M].北京:气象出版社,2015:36-40.
    [12] PENEDER M.The problem of private under-investment in innovation:a policy mind map[J].Technovation,2008,28(8):518-530.
    [13] MUKHERJEE A,SINGH M,ALDOKAS A.Do corporate taxes hinder innovation?[J].Journal of Financial Economics,2017,124(1):195-221.