陕北黄土高原丘陵沟壑区生态综合绩效评价
|
摘要
为了推进主体功能区建设,构建陕北黄土高原丘陵沟壑区生态综合绩效评价体系,包含3个一级指标和11个二级指标,利用PSR模型与熵值法相结合的方式测算该重点生态功能区2009—2016年生态综合绩效。研究表明:该地区生态综合绩效水平呈波动上升趋势,2016年生态综合指数为0.997 6,达到测算年份中生态环境的最佳状态。其中,人均GDP、农、林、牧、渔业总产值、人工造林面积3项指标对生态绩效的影响程度最大。因此,该地区应重视三次产业协同发展、提高资源利用效率、落实乡村振兴战略、立足资源优势、打造区域品牌,以推进主体功能区建设为基础,全面协调经济、社会、生态和谐发展。
To promote the construction of main functional areas in the hilly and gully region of the Loess Plateau in northern Shaanxi, an ecological comprehensive performance evaluation system was constructed including 3 primary indicators and 11 secondary indicators. The PSR model and entropy method were used to measure the ecological comprehensive performance of the key ecological area in 2009-2016.The result showed that the ecological performance of the key ecological function area appeared a fluctuating upward trend. The ecological comprehensive index was 0.9976 in 2016, reaching the best state of ecological environment for the years caculated. GDP per capita, total output value of agriculture, forestry, animal husbandry and fishery, and artificial afforestation area had the greatest impact on ecological performance. To coordinate the harmonious development of economy, society and ecology, it is suggested to attach importance to the coordinated development of the three industries, improvement of the utilization efficiency of resources, implement of the strategy of rural revitalization, and the building of regional brands based on resource advantages.
To promote the construction of main functional areas in the hilly and gully region of the Loess Plateau in northern Shaanxi, an ecological comprehensive performance evaluation system was constructed including 3 primary indicators and 11 secondary indicators. The PSR model and entropy method were used to measure the ecological comprehensive performance of the key ecological area in 2009-2016.The result showed that the ecological performance of the key ecological function area appeared a fluctuating upward trend. The ecological comprehensive index was 0.9976 in 2016, reaching the best state of ecological environment for the years caculated. GDP per capita, total output value of agriculture, forestry, animal husbandry and fishery, and artificial afforestation area had the greatest impact on ecological performance. To coordinate the harmonious development of economy, society and ecology, it is suggested to attach importance to the coordinated development of the three industries, improvement of the utilization efficiency of resources, implement of the strategy of rural revitalization, and the building of regional brands based on resource advantages.
引文
[1]国家发展和改革委员会.全国及各地区主体功能区规划(下)[M].北京:人民出版社,2015.
[2]丁四保.主体功能区划与区域生态补偿问题研究[M].北京:科学出版社,2012
[3]于长青.以“绩效文化”替代“政绩文化”[J].当代社科视野,2012(9):49.
[4]舒宁.沈阳市铁西老工业区城市更新的社会绩效评价[D].北京:中国城市规划设计研究院,2010.
[5]颜文涛,萧敬豪,胡海,等.城市空间结构的环境绩效:进展与思考[J].城市规划学刊,2012,5:50-59.
[6]安超.城乡空间利用生态绩效的内涵、表现及内在机理探析[J].城市发展研究,2013,20(6):16-24.
[7]曾琼,孟全省.自然资源净资产视角下的生态绩效评价--以陕南生态功能区为例[J].农村经济,2017(8):85-90.
[8]韩德军,朱道林,迟超月,等.连片地区不同类型主体功能区绩效评价创新方法研究--以贵州省毕节市3个连片县域为例[J].科技管理研究,2015,35(6):45-49.
[9]朱海彬,任晓冬,黎飞,等.我国主体功能区经济发展差异评价及协调发展对策研究--以黔中经济区为例[J].科技管理研究,2014,34(20):70-73,78.
[10]王晓玲,仝耀华.基于统计综合评价的主体功能区协调发展探析[J].山西大同大学学报(自然科学版),2014,30(3):6-8,11.
[11]刘欣英,安树伟.基于主体功能区的西部城市化地区评价及发展研究[J].经济问题,2014(3):121-124.
[12]王健.完善发展成果考核评价体系,构建主体功能区政绩指标[J].行政管理改革,2014,3(3):22-29.
[13]李伟,安晓梅.基于熵值法对南疆地区生态绩效评估的研究[J].塔里木大学学报,2017,29(1):76-84.
[14]张涛,成金华.湖北省重点生态功能区生态补偿绩效评价[J].中国国土资源经济,2017,30(5):37-41.
[15]李旭辉,朱启贵.生态主体功能区经济社会发展绩效动态综合评价[J].中央财经大学学报,2017(7):96-105.
[16]王倩.主体功能区绩效评价研究[J].经济纵横,2007(7):21-23.
[2]丁四保.主体功能区划与区域生态补偿问题研究[M].北京:科学出版社,2012
[3]于长青.以“绩效文化”替代“政绩文化”[J].当代社科视野,2012(9):49.
[4]舒宁.沈阳市铁西老工业区城市更新的社会绩效评价[D].北京:中国城市规划设计研究院,2010.
[5]颜文涛,萧敬豪,胡海,等.城市空间结构的环境绩效:进展与思考[J].城市规划学刊,2012,5:50-59.
[6]安超.城乡空间利用生态绩效的内涵、表现及内在机理探析[J].城市发展研究,2013,20(6):16-24.
[7]曾琼,孟全省.自然资源净资产视角下的生态绩效评价--以陕南生态功能区为例[J].农村经济,2017(8):85-90.
[8]韩德军,朱道林,迟超月,等.连片地区不同类型主体功能区绩效评价创新方法研究--以贵州省毕节市3个连片县域为例[J].科技管理研究,2015,35(6):45-49.
[9]朱海彬,任晓冬,黎飞,等.我国主体功能区经济发展差异评价及协调发展对策研究--以黔中经济区为例[J].科技管理研究,2014,34(20):70-73,78.
[10]王晓玲,仝耀华.基于统计综合评价的主体功能区协调发展探析[J].山西大同大学学报(自然科学版),2014,30(3):6-8,11.
[11]刘欣英,安树伟.基于主体功能区的西部城市化地区评价及发展研究[J].经济问题,2014(3):121-124.
[12]王健.完善发展成果考核评价体系,构建主体功能区政绩指标[J].行政管理改革,2014,3(3):22-29.
[13]李伟,安晓梅.基于熵值法对南疆地区生态绩效评估的研究[J].塔里木大学学报,2017,29(1):76-84.
[14]张涛,成金华.湖北省重点生态功能区生态补偿绩效评价[J].中国国土资源经济,2017,30(5):37-41.
[15]李旭辉,朱启贵.生态主体功能区经济社会发展绩效动态综合评价[J].中央财经大学学报,2017(7):96-105.
[16]王倩.主体功能区绩效评价研究[J].经济纵横,2007(7):21-23.