沉管节段接头剪力键三维数值力学特性研究
详细信息 本馆镜像全文    |  推荐本文 | | 获取馆网全文
摘要
基于ANSYS有限元软件,构建沉管节段三维数值模型,在节段接头处定义接触单元,采用只受压的杆单元模拟橡胶支座,并定义其为双折线材料。调节沉管下部土层的弹性模量与泊松比,模拟沉管隧道在不均匀荷载及沉降条件下的纵向弯曲与扭转工况。通过分析节段接头剪力键的应力及剪力分布特征,研究沉管接头剪力键在上述工况下的受力特性。并将数值结果与大比例尺节段接头剪力键模型试验结果相对比。主要结论:两类工况中,竖向剪力键承担了几乎全部的竖向剪力,但对水平方向的抗剪基本不起作用,而水平剪力键在两类工况中都产生了水平剪力;扭转工况中,地层较软一侧竖向剪力键剪力较大;在剪力键端头角点及与节段衔接处局部应力较大。
Based on the finite element software ANSYS,adopting contact elements at segment joints,utilizing double line elastic link elements,which can be only compressed,to simulate rubber pads,the three dimensional and numerical model of segmental immersed tunnel was constructed. The longitudinal bending and twisting working conditions of immersed tunnel under uneven load and settlement conditions could be simulated,by means of adjusting the elastic modulus and Poisson ratios of soil layers under the immersed tunnel. In addition,through analyzing characteristics of stresses and shearing forces on segment joint shear keys,the mechanical capacity of these keys was studied.Finally,the numerical results were compared with the results of large scale model test. The main conclusions are that,vertical shear keys which undertake most vertical shearing force have barely contribution to horizontal shearing resistance. However,the horizontal shear keys have horizontal shearing force in all these conditions. The shearing force of vertical shear keys on the side of soft layer is bigger than that on the side of hard layer. Furthermore,partial stresses on tips and connection areas of shear keys are significant.
引文
[1]Kiyomiya O.Earthquake resistant design features of immersed tunnels in Japan[J].Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology,1995,10(4):463-475.
    [2]严松宏,高峰,李德武,等.沉管隧道地震响应分析若干问题的研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2004,23(5):846-850.(Yan Songhong,Gao Feng,Li Dewu,et al.Studies on some issues of seismic response analysis for submersed tunnel[J].Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering,2004,23(5):846-850.(in Chinese))
    [3]陈贵红.沉管隧道地震响应的影响因素分析[J].中国铁道科学,2005,26(6):94-97.(Chen Guihong.Analysis of the affecting factors for seismic response of immersed tunnel[J].China Railway Science,2005,26(6):94-97.(in Chinese))
    [4]Anastasopoulos I,Gerolymos N,Drosos V,et al.Nonlinear response of deep immersed tunnel to strong seismic shaking[J].Journal of Geotechnical&Geo-environmental Engineering,2007,133(9):1 067-1 090.
    [5]刘建飞,贺维国,曾进群.静力作用下沉管隧道三维数值模拟[J].现代隧道技术,2007,44(1):5-9.(Liu Jianfei,He Weiguo,Zeng Jinqun.Three-dimensional simulation for the static behavior of immersed tube tunnels[J].Modern Tunneling Technology,2007,44(1):5-9.(in Chinese))
    [6]陈清军,朱合华,李彤,等.沉管隧道结构的空间受力性态分析[J].力学季刊,2000,21(2):237-242.(Chen Qingjun,Zhu Hehua,Li Tong,et al.The 3D internal force analysis of immersed tunnel[J].Chinese Quarterly of Mechanics,2000,21(2):237-242.(in Chinese))
    [7]Ding J,Jin X,Guo Y,et al.Numerical simulation for large-scale seismic response analysis of immersed tunnel[J].Engineering Structures,2006,28:1 367-1 377.
    [8]刘正根,黄宏伟,张冬梅.沉管隧道接头三维非线性数值模拟[J].地下空间与工程学报,2011,7(4):691-694.(Liu Zhenggen,Huang Hongwei,Zhang Dongmei.3D nonlinear numerical simulation on immersed tunnel joint[J].Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering,2011,7(4):691-694.(in Chinese))
    [9]Taylor P,Ibrahim H,Yang D.Seismic retrofit of George Massey Tunnel[J].Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics,2005,34:519-542.
    [10]Wu C,Fok E,Fotinos G,et al.Seismic assessment and retrofit concepts of the BART trans bay tube[J].American Society of Civil Engineers,2003,(25):203-212.

版权所有:© 2023 中国地质图书馆 中国地质调查局地学文献中心