松辽盆地北部双城地区扶余油层层序地层格架与沉积体系展布
详细信息 本馆镜像全文    |  推荐本文 | | 获取馆网全文
摘要
通过多口岩心精细观察,结合135口探井资料分析,识别出各种沉积微相标志,确定了松辽盆地北部双城地区扶余油层主要为曲流河-浅水三角洲沉积体系,进一步划分为5种亚相、11种微相。以高分辨率层序地层学理论为指导,通过岩-电结合、井-震结合等技术手段,识别层序界面,将其详细划分为2个长期基准面半旋回、7个中期基准面旋回,建立等时层序地层格架。以中期基准面旋回为编图单元,结合地震属性综合分析,编制了不同时期岩相古地理图,分析其演化规律,建立沉积模式,研究表明:研究区扶余油层主要经历了2个大的演化阶段:Q3-sq1—Q4-sq1时期,由浅水三角洲平原沉积逐渐向曲流河沉积转换;Q4-sq2—Q4-sq3时期,由曲流河沉积向浅水三角洲平原、前缘沉积转换,反映水体先变浅又逐渐变深的一次湖退-湖侵沉积过程,为近期油气勘探提供重要的指导意义。
Based on core observation,combined with 135 exploration wells data,various sedimentary microfacies signs were identified. All these showed that Fuyu reservoir mainly developed meandering river-shallow water delta depositional system in Shuangcheng area,Northern Songliao Basin,furtherly divided into 5 subfacies and11 microfacies. With the guidance of high resolution sequence stratigraphy,using the technologies of rock-electric combination,well-seismic combination and so on,several sequence boundaries were identified. Fuyu reservoir can be divided into 2 long-term base level hemicycles and 7 middle-term base level cycles,and in this way,isochronous sequence stratigraphy framework has been established. Taking middle-term base level cycle as compilation unit,combined with the analysis of seismic attribute,lithofacies paleographic maps in different period were compiled and depositional model was established. Research show that Fuyu reservoir in study area mainly experienced two evolutionary stages: during the period of Q3-sq1—Q4-sq1,shallow delta plain gradually converted to meandering river; while during the period of Q4-sq2—Q4-sq3,meandering river depositional systemconverted to delta plain subfaceis and delta front subfacies. All these reflected a lake retreat-lake transgression depositional process during which the sedimentary water is firstly shallowing then gradually deepening. The results of above studies provide an important guidance for recent oil and gas exploration.
引文
[1]魏兆胜,苗洪波,王艳清,等.松辽盆地长春岭背斜带成藏过程[J].石油勘探与开发,2006,33(3):351-355.
    [2]高瑞祺,蔡希源.松辽盆地油气田形成条件与分布规律[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1997:1-319.
    [3]黄薇,吴海波,施立志,等.松辽盆地北部朝长地区扶余油层油气来源及成藏特征[J].中南大学学报:自然科学版,2012,43(1):238-247.
    [4]李延平,陈树民,宋永忠,等.大庆长垣及以东泉三、四段扶杨油层浅水湖泊-三角洲体系沉积特征[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2005,24(5):13-16.
    [5]陈方文,卢双舫,刘绍军.王府凹陷扶余油层的高分辨率层序地层及沉积特征研究[J].地层学杂志,2011,35(4):367-373.
    [6]赵小庆,鲍志东,刘宗飞,等.河控三角洲水下分流河道砂体储集层构型精细分析:以扶余油田探51区块为例[J].石油勘探与开发,2013,40(2):181-187.
    [7]李志鹏,林承焰,董波,等.河控三角洲水下分流河道砂体内部建筑结构模式[J].石油学报,2012,33(1):101-105.
    [8]陈方文,卢双舫,石美娟,等.松辽盆地王府凹陷断层特征及对油气的控制[J].中南大学学报:自然科学版,2012,43(1):249-256.
    [9]陈少平,熊才华,林水清,等.双城凹陷断裂特征及其对油气运聚的控制[J].石油天然气学报,2006,28(5):16-20.
    [10]陈昭年,王小敏,陈珊,等.松辽盆地朝长地区扶余油层的构造演化[J].现代地质,2008,22(4):512-519.
    [11]周永炳,王秀娟,沈旭友,等.大庆油田朝长地区扶余油层断层封闭性及其演化[J].现代地质,2009,23(5):880-886.
    [12]李璐璐.朝45区块扶杨油层层序特征与油气成藏研究[D].大庆:大庆石油学院,2009:18-23.
    [13]胡明毅,肖欢,马艳荣,等.缓坡坳陷型盆地层序界面识别标志——以松辽盆地下白垩统扶杨油层为例[J].石油天然气学报,2010,32(2):26-30.
    [14]胡明毅,刘仙晴.测井相在松辽盆地北部泉三、四段沉积微相分析中的应用[J].岩性油气藏,2009,21(1):102-106.
    [15]Cross T A.High-resolutions stratigraphic correlation from the perspective of base-level cycles and sediment accommodations[J].Proceedings of Northwestern European Sequence Stratigraphy Congress,1994:105-123.
    [16]邓宏文,王红亮,祝永军,等.高分辨率层序地层学:原理及应用[M].北京:地质出版社,2002:1-200.
    [17]于兴河,李胜利,李顺利.三角洲沉积的结构-成因分类与编图方法[J].沉积学报,2013,31(5):782-794.
    [18]张世广,卢双舫,张雁,等.高分辨率层序地层学在储层宏观非均质性研究中的应用——以松辽盆地朝阳沟油田朝1-朝气3区块扶余油层为例[J].沉积学报,2009,27(3):458-467.
    [19]柳东.高分辨率层序控制下的砂体分布规律研究——以松辽盆地扶余油田为例[J].资源环境与工程,2010,24(1):55-59.
    [20]封从军,鲍志东,张吉辉,等.扶余油田中区泉四段基准面旋回划分及对单砂体的控制[J].吉林大学学报:地球科学版,2012,42(2):62-69.

版权所有:© 2023 中国地质图书馆 中国地质调查局地学文献中心