Anomalous zones of high electrical conductivity and pronounced electrical anisotropy have been detect- ed by geophysical electromagnetic deep surveys in some regions of the uppermost mantle; nevertheless, their ori- gin remains a long-standing controversial issue. Several conduction mechanisms have been proposed, such as the presence of partial melts, H-bearing olivine, graphite and sulfides in grain boundaries, Fe-rich garnet and hy- drous minerals like micas. The differences between these models have significantly different impacts on the com- position, structure and physical-chemical properties of the uppermost mantle, and even on the triggering of earthquakes and the styles of mantle convection and other dynamical processes. Based on recent studies of petro- logy, geochemistry, geophysics, numerical modeling and laboratory high-pressure and high-temperature experi- ments, this paper deals with various problems involved with the available models. The authors hold that electri- cal anomalies in some regions of the uppermost mantle may be related to its macro-scale heterogeneities, includ- ing the local enrichment of Fe3 +- and H20-rich augites (and other pyroxenite analogues) in the form of dykes/ veins and/or the local presence of remnants from recycled crustal materials (e. g., conductive subduction-associ- ated oceanic and continental crust and/or delaminated continental deep crust stretched into high aspect ratio bands/lenses due to mantle flow). Electrical anomalies in different regions of the uppermost mantle may have different origins, and thus eeking for a single unique explanation seems unnecessary.