Protective effects of ischemic postconditioning on intestinal mucosa barrier function in rabbits with crush injury of hind limb: an experimental study

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Jun-tao DING^a ; Lian-yang ZHANG ; ^a ; ^{dpzhangly@163.com}
• 关键词：Ischemic postconditioning ; Crush syndrome ; Intestinal mucosa
• 刊名：Chinese Journal of Traumatology (English Edition)
• 出版年：2011
• 出版时间：April 2011
• 年：2011
• 卷：14
• 期：2
• 页码：92-95
• 全文大小：647 K

文摘

Objective

To explore the protective effects of two types of ischemic postconditioning (IP) on intestinal mucosa barrier in rabbits with crush injury of the hind limb.

Methods

This study was conducted between August and December 2008 in the Department of Trauma Surgery, Daping Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China. The model of crush injury to the hind limb of rabbits was firstly developed by a 25 kg object with the right hind limbs fixed by wooden splints, and then two types of IP were established, including occluding/opening the common iliac artery and vein alternatively (traditional IP, IP A) and binding/loosening the proximum of the injured hind limb alternatively (modified IP, IP B). Thirty-six male New Zealand white rabbits were randomly divided into three groups: IP A group, IP B group and control group, with 12 rabbits in each group. The serum levels of diamine oxidase (DAO) and intestinal fatty acid-binding protein (I-FABP) were detected at 2, 6, 12 and 24 hours after injury. Pathological changes of ileum were examined at 24 hours after injury.

Results

The serum levels of I-FABP at 2, 6, 12 and 24 hours after injury in both IP A and IP B groups had a significant decrease, compared with control group. DAO levels also showed the same change trend at 2 and 6 hours after injury, but showed no significant difference between two IP groups. No difference in pathological changes of ileum was found among the three groups.

Conclusions

IP can protect intestinal mucosa barrier function on the model of hind limb crush injury in rabbits. Meanwhile the modified IP B shows the same protection as the traditional IP A, and is worth applying in clinic.